請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/62772完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王衍智(Yanzhi Wang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wei-Hsiang Hung | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 洪煒翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T16:09:58Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-07-17 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-07-17 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-06-02 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] Anandarajan, A., Chiang, S., & Lee, P. (2010). R&D Tax Credit and Operating Performance: Implication for Managers. Manager Decision, 48, 1198-1211.
[2] Athey, S., & Imbens, W. G. (2006). Identification and Inference in Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences Models. Econometrica, 74, 431-497. [3] Berger, G. P. (1993). Explicit and Implicit Tax Effects of the R&D Tax Credit. Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 131-171. [4] Bloom, N., Griffith, R., & Reenen, J.V. (2002). Do R&D Tax Credits Work? Evidence from a Panel of Countries 1979-1997. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 1-31. [5] Card, D., & Krueger, B. A. (1994). Minimum Wages and Employment: a Case Study of the Fast-food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The American Economic Review, 8, 772-793. [6] Eisner, R., Albert, H. S., & Sullivan, A. (1984). The New Incremental Tax Credit for R&D: Incentive or Disincentive?. National Tax Journal, 37, 171-183. [7] Erdogen, M., Yamaltdinova, A. (2019). A Panel Study of the Impact of R&D on Financial Performance Evidence from an Emerging Market. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 541-545. [8] Essama-Nssah, B. (2006). Propensity Score Matching and Policy Impact Analysis - A Demonstration in EViews (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper; No. WPS 3877). Washington, DC: The World Bank. [9] Li, H., Graham, J. D., & Majumdar, A. (2012). The Effects of Congestion Charging on Road Traffic Casualties: A Causal Analysis Using Difference-in-Differences Estimation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 49, 366-377. [10] Mansfield, E. (1986). The R&D Tax Credit and Other Technology Policy Issues. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 190-194. [11] Stuart, A. E., Huskamp, A. H., Duckworth, K., Simmons, J., Song, Z., Chernew, E. M., & Barry, L. C. (2014). Using Propensity Scores in Difference-in-Differences Models to Estimate the Effects of a Policy Change. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 14, 166-182. [12] Yang, C. H., Huang, C. H., & Hou, C. T. (2012). Tax Incentives and R&D Activity: Firm-level Evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, 41(9), 1578-1588. [13] 王健全、陳厚銘(1995)。研究發展投資抵減獎勵效果評析。中山管理評論,3,24-40。 [14] 王國平(2000)。投資抵減對企業價值提升效果之研究。國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。 [15] 李涵茵(2004)。「促進產業升級條例」對總體經濟之成效分析。台灣綜合研究院,未出版。 [16] 葉淑滿(2009)。投資抵減優惠對企業研究發展支出與經營績效關連性影響之研究。東吳大學會計學研究所碩士論文,未出版。 [17] 鄭惠方(2005)。投資抵減與企業經營績效間之關聯性研究。國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文,未出版。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/62772 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討於2010年5月12日廢止的『促進產業升級條例』,對於公司營運績效(ROA)之影響。本研究的樣本來自台灣經濟新報資料庫中,2003年至2017年的所有(曾)上市櫃公司財務資料,並採用傾向分數匹配的方法將受惠公司及未受惠公司進行配對,最後產生18,403筆有效樣本點。接著,本研究採用差異中之差異法,來探討條例廢止後對於受惠公司後續營運績效之影響。在ROA方面,條例廢止後,公司之營運表現在三年內明顯變差,甚至將時間拉長至5年或7年表現仍無改善;在調整完研發費用後的ROA方面,與ROA的結果一致。綜合以上,以公司經營績效的角度來看,本研究認為促進產業升級條例的廢止可使企業學習培養獨立自主的能力。原因在於條例僅讓公司短期間享有投資費用的抵減,而使條例期間擁有較佳之營運表現;然而,在條例廢止後,公司並無法建立或提升自身的研發能力,進一步將研究成果轉化為績效表現。甚至習慣於享有抵減優惠,而使之後的營運效率變差。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper studies the impact on the firm's operation performance (ROA) after the termination of“Statute for Upgrading Industry” on May 12, 2010. The sample of this research came from Taiwan Economic Journal database and included all active and inactive firms’ financial data from 2003 to 2017. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was adopted to match the treated firms with the untreated firms, and finally 18,403 sample was generated. Next, this paper used Difference-in-Differences (DID) regression to examine the impact of the terminated statute on treated firms’ operating performance. In terms of ROA, after the statute was repealed, firms’ operating performance significantly deteriorated within three years. And even after 7 years, the performance had not improved. Moreover, the result of R&D expense-adjusted ROA consists with the result of ROA. Based on above, from the perspective of firm's operating performance, the termination of“Statute for Upgrading Industry” could make firms cultivate the ability to operate independently. The reason is that the statute only benefited firms to enjoy investment tax credits for a short period, which resulted in better operating performance only during the statute carried out. However, after the statute was ended, treated firms could not equip its own R&D capability and further turned R&D result into long-term performance. In addition, treated firms might get used to previous tax credits and made their future operations worse. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T16:09:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-R07723064-1.pdf: 1394269 bytes, checksum: 51ac0224c851776177324017f9385ddb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 #
致謝 i 中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iii CONTENTS iv LIST OF TABLES vi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review 4 2.1 Statute for Upgrading Industry 4 2.1.1 Lesgislative History 4 2.1.2 Statute Overview. 5 2.2 Related Research 5 Chapter 3 Data and Methodology 9 3.1 Data 9 3.1.1 Overview 9 3.1.2 Variable Definition 9 3.1.3 Sample Selection for Treated Group and Untreated Group 11 3.2 Propensity Score Matching 12 3.3 Methodology – Difference-in-Differences 16 Chapter 4 Empirical Results 18 4.1 Regression Analysis of Difference-in-Differences 18 4.1.1 Main DID model 18 4.1.2 Other DID models 20 4.2 Parallel Trend 22 4.3 Other Assumptions 23 Chapter 5 Conclusion 24 ENGLISH REFERENCE 26 CHINESE REFERENCE 28 APPENDIX 29 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 公司營運績效 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 傾向分數配對 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 促進產業升級條例 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 投資抵減 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資產報酬率 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 差異中之差異法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Statute for Upgarding Industry | en |
| dc.subject | Operating Performance | en |
| dc.subject | ROA | en |
| dc.subject | Difference-in-Differences | en |
| dc.subject | Propensity Score Matching | en |
| dc.subject | Tax Credits | en |
| dc.title | 廢止促進產業升級條例對公司營運績效之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of the Termination of 'Statute for Upgrading Industry' on Operating Performance | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何耕宇,張景宏 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 促進產業升級條例,投資抵減,傾向分數配對,差異中之差異法,資產報酬率,公司營運績效, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Statute for Upgarding Industry,Tax Credits,Propensity Score Matching,Difference-in-Differences,ROA,Operating Performance, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 38 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202000927 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-06-03 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-109-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.36 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
