請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6219
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳思賢 | |
dc.contributor.author | Shuan-Yi Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林軒毅 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-16T16:23:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-15 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-16T16:23:24Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-07-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文書目
專書 卞之琳 1999 《新譯本 莎士比亞四大悲劇(上)》,台北:貓頭鷹。 1999 《新譯本 莎士比亞四大悲劇(下)》,台北:貓頭鷹。 王溢嘉 編著 1992 《精神分析與文學》,台北:野鵝。 朱立民 1993 《愛情、仇恨、政治—漢姆雷特專論即其他》,台北:三民。 呂健忠 2011 《情慾幽林(修訂版)—西洋上古情慾文學選集》,台北:秀威資訊。 吳光遠、徐萬里 2006 《佛洛伊德:慾望決定命運》,北京:新世界。 李豔梅 2009 《莎士比亞歷史劇研究》,北京:中國社會科學。 孟憲強 1994 《中國莎學簡史》,長春:東北師範大學。 周偉馳 2005 《基督教的政治思想》,北京:中國社會科學。 紀蔚然 2008 《誤解莎士比亞》,台北:印刻出版社。 彭鏡禧 2004 《細說莎士比亞論文集》,台北:國立台灣大學出版中心。 陳思賢 2006 《西洋政治思想史—現代英國篇》,台北:五南出版社。 1999 《西洋政治思想史-古典世界篇》,台北:五南出版社。 張永義 2010 《生死欲念—「西方文學永恆的主題」》,北京:文化藝術出版社。 劉小楓、陳少明 2006 《馬基雅維利的喜劇》,北京:華夏出版社。 2007a 《莎士比亞筆下的王者》,北京:華夏出版社。 2007b 《政治哲學中的莎士比亞》,北京:華夏出版社。 黃兆傑 1990 《莎劇精選一百段》,台北:商務印書館。 鄔昆如 1971 《西洋哲學史》,台北:正中書局。 蘇昌美 1983 《愛的哲學》,台北:東大。 顏元叔 1995 《莎士比亞通論 歷史劇》,台北:書林。 1997 《莎士比亞通論 悲劇》,台北:書林。 2001 《莎士比亞通論 喜劇》,台北:書林。 2002 《莎士比亞通論 傳奇劇、商籟、詩篇》,台北:書林。 謝鵬雄 2004 《莎士比亞的政治語言》,台北:三民出版。 關永中 1997 《愛、恨與死亡:一個現代哲學的探索》,台北:台灣商務。 期刊 王淑華 1994 〈政治與戲劇:中國莎學初探〉,《中外文學》,23(2):138-153。 陳妙芬 2003 〈人性化的活動-人文價值的意義與規範性〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,7:1-40。 陳思賢 2000 〈《神曲》與經世:詩人但丁與公民但丁〉,《政治科學論叢》,12:1-32 2007 〈英國風的《君王論》莎士比亞《亨利四世》(上、下)為君之道的探討〉,《政治科學論叢》,32期:31-70。 陳華文 2011 〈對馬基雅維利的重釋:基于《曼陀羅的文本分析》〉,《中國人民大學學報》,1:94-101。 許國賢 2000 〈恐懼感與政治〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,12(1):79-101。 劉瓊云 2001 〈卡力本(Caliban)的失落與尋回—《暴風雨》(The Tempest)及《魔法師寶典》(Prospero’s Books)〉,《中外文學》,29(10):183-203。 戴雅雯 1998 〈慾望城國:馬克白的三張臉〉,《中外文學》,26(9):35-54。 二、西文書目 Books Arendt Hannah 1996 “Love and Saint Augustine”, Chicago: University Press. Alvis, John E., and Thomas G. West, eds. 2000 “Shakespeare as Political Thinker”, Wilmington, DE : Intercollegiate and Studies Institute Books. Ansell-Pearson,Keith 1991 “Nietzsche contra Rousseau”, New York : Cambridge University Press Blits, Jan H. 1993 “The End of the Ancient Republic: Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar”, Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield. 1996 “The insufficiency of virtue : Macbeth and the natural order”, Md. : Rowman & Littlefield. Bloom, Allan, and Harry V. Jaffa. 1964 “Shakespeare’s Politics”, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Bloom, Allan. 1968 “The Republic of Plato”, New York: Basic Books. 1986 “Shakespeare’s politics”, Chicago : University of Chicago Press. 2000 “Shakespeare on love and friendship”, Chicago : University of Chicago Press. 2007 《巨人與侏儒》(增訂版),張輝等譯,北京:華夏出版社。 2009 《莎士比亞的政治》,潘望譯,江蘇:鳳凰出版傳媒集團。 Bloom, Harold 1998 《西方正典(上)》,高志仁譯,台北:立緒出版社。 1998 “Shakespeare: the invention of the human”, London : Fourth Estate. 2010 “Harold Bloom's Shakespeare through the ages”, New York : Facts On File Inc. Brown, Peter Robert Lamont 2000 “Augustine of Hippo: a biography”, Berkeley: University of California Press. Campbell ,Joseph 1973 “Myths to live by”, New York : Bantam Books. Cantor, Paul 1976 “Shakespeare’s Rome: Republic and Empire”, Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Camus, Albert 2006 《薛西弗斯的神話》,張漢良譯台北:志文出版社。 Campbell, Joseph 1991 “The Power of Myth”, New York : Anchor Books. Cooper, Laurence D 2008 “Eros in Plato, Rousseau, and Nietzsche : the politics of infinity”, University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press. E. M. W. Tillyard 1980 “Shakespeare's history plays”, London : Chatto & Windus Freud, Sigmund 1962 “Three essays on the theory of sexuality”, New York : Basic Books 1987 《精神分析引論、新論》,高覺敷譯,北京:商務圖書。 2008 《論佛洛伊德的「群體心理學與自我的分析」》,楊大和譯,台北:五南。 1998 《佛洛伊德文集》,車文博編,長春市:長春。 Gouinlock, James S 2004 “Eros and the good : wisdom according to nature”, Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Grady, Hugh 2002 “Shakespeare Machiavelli and Montaigne”, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Guido Ruggiero 2007 “Machiavelli in love : sex, self, and society in the Italian Renaissance”, Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press. Haig Patapan 2006 “Machiavelli in love : the modern politics of love and fear”, Lanham, MD : Lexington Books. Harald Koisser, Eugen Maria Schulak 2007 《愛、欲望、出軌的哲學》,張純華譯,台北:商周出版。 Herbert, A. Deane. 1963 “The Political and Social Idear of St.Augustine”, New York:Columbia University Press. Homer 1985 “The Iliad” ,trans. by A. T. Murray, New York : G.P. Putnam's. Hesiod 2006 “Theogony ; and, Works and days”, trans. translated and with introductions by Catherine M. Schlegel and Henry Weinfield, Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press Joseph, A. & V. Sullivan 1996 “Shakespeare’s Political Pageant: Essay in Literature and Politics”, Lanham , MD:Rowman & Littlefield. Leggatt, Alexander 1988 “Shakespeare’s Political Drama: The History Play and the Rome Plays”, New York: Routledge. Lowenthal, David 1997 “Shakespeare and The Good Life: Ethics and Political in Dramatics Form”, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Ludwig, Paul W 2002 “Eros and polis : desire and community in Greek political theory”, New York : Cambridge University Press. Lupton, Julia Reinhard 2005 “Citizen-saints : Shakespeare and political theology”, University of Chicago Press. 2011 “Thinking with Shakespeare: essays on political and life”, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago. Jean Laplanche, J.-B. Pontalis 2000 《精神分析詞彙》,沈志忠、王文基譯,台北:行人出版社。 Jean-Jacques, Rousseau 1986 《論人類不平等的起源和基礎》,李常山譯,台北:唐山出版。 1993 《新愛洛伊絲》,何三雅譯,南京:譯林出版。 1994 《愛彌兒》,李平漚譯,台北:五南出版。 Kaufmann, Walter Arnold 1974 “Nietzsche, philosopher, psychologist, antichrist”, N.J. : Princeton University Press. Martha ,C. Nussbaum 1994 “The therapy of desire : theory and practice in Hellenistic ethics”, Princeton University Press. May, Rollo 1969 “Love and Will”, New York : Norton. 2003 《權力與無知》,朱侃如譯,台北:立緒出版社。 Newell, Waller R 2000 “Ruling passion : the erotics of statecraft in Platonic political philosophy”, Lanham, Md. : Rowman & Littlefield. Niccolo, Machiavelli 2003 《曼陀羅:五幕喜劇》,徐衛翔譯,上海:上海人民。 1998 《君王論》,閻克文譯,台北:商務。 Nietzsche, Friedrich 1983 《查拉圖斯特拉如是說》,余鴻榮譯,台北:志文出版社。 1971 《悲劇的誕生》,劉崎譯,台北:志文出版社。 2006 “Thus spoke Zarathustra”, New York : Cambrige University Press. 2007 《朝霞》,田立年譯,上海:華東師範大學。 Nordlund, Marcus 2007 “Shakespeare and the nature of love : literature, culture, evolution”, Evanston, Ill. : Northwestern University Press. Norwich, John Julius 1999 “Shakespeare’s Kings: the Great Plays and the History of England in the Middle Ages, 1337-1485”, New York: Scribner. Nygren, Anders 1953 “Agape and Eros”, Lodon:S.P.C.K. Oakeshott, Michael 1962 “Rationalism in Politics: and other essays”, Oxford University Press. 1990 “On human conduct”, New York : Oxford University Press. Osborne, Catherine. 1994 “Eros unveiled : Plato and the God of love”, New York : Oxford University Press. Palmer ,John 1962 “Political and comic characters of Shakespeare”, New York : St Martin's Press. Penman, Bruce (eds) 1978 “Five Italian Renaissance comedies”, New York : Penguin. Plato 2003 《柏拉圖全集(卷二)》,王曉朝譯,台北:左岸文化。 2007 《會飲篇》,王曉朝譯,台北:左岸文化。 2007 《國家篇》,王曉朝譯,台北:左岸文化。 2002 《斐多》,楊絳譯,台北:時報文化。 Price, A.W 1989 “Love and friendship in Plato and Aristotle”, New York : Oxford University Press. Rosen, Stanley 1995 “The mask of enlightenment : Nietzsche's Zarathustra”, New York : Cambridge University Press. Rovine,Harvey 1987 “Silence in Shakespeare : drama, power, and gender”, Ann Arbor, Mich. : UMI Research Press. Ruokanen, Miikka 2008 《奧古斯丁《上帝之城》中的社會生活哲學》,張曉梅譯,北京:中國社會科學。 Russell, Bertrand 1991 “History of western philosophy and its connection with political and social circumstances from the earliest times to the present day”, London : Routledge. Saccio, Peter 1977 “Shakespeare’s English Kings: History, Chronicles and Drama”, Oxford : Oxford University Press. Santas , Gerasimos 1988 “Plato and Freud : two theories of love”, Oxford: B. Blackwell. Shakespeare, William 1967 《莎士比亞全集》,梁實秋譯,台北:遠東圖書公司。 1995 《中譯定莎士比亞全集》,朱生豪譯,台北:國家出版社。 2007 “The Complete Works”, Ed. Jonathan Bate and Eric Rasmussen. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Sheffield, Frisbee C.C 2006 “Plato's Symposium : the ethics of desire”, New York : Oxford University Press. Singer, Irving 1984a “The nature of love V1”, Chicago : University of Chicago Press. 1984b “The nature of love V2”, Chicago : University of Chicago Press. St. Augustine 1961 “The Confessions”, trans.with an Introduction by R.R. Pine-Coffin. New York and London:Penguin. 1985 《懺悔錄》,徐玉芹譯,台北:志文出版。 2003 《上帝之城(上冊)》,王曉朝譯,香港:道風書社。 2003 《上帝之城(中冊)》,王曉朝譯,香港:道風書社。 2003 《上帝之城(下冊)》,王曉朝譯,香港:道風書社。 Strauss, Leo 2001 “Leo Strauss on Plato's Symposium.”, Ed. Seth Benardete. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. Stewart, Stanley 2010 “Shakespeare and philosophy”, New York : Routledge. Strong, Tracy.B 1988 “Friedrich Nietzsche and the politics of transfiguration”, Berkeley : University of California Press. Soble, Alan 1989 “Eros, agape, and philia : readings in the philosophy of Love”, New York, N.Y. : Paragon House. Tillich, Paul 2000 《基督教思想史》,伊大貽譯,香港:漢語基督教文化研究所。 Weber, Max 2005 《學術與政治:韋伯選集(1)》,錢永祥等譯,台北:遠流。 Articles Bertelli Sergio 1971 “When Did Machiavelli Write Mandragola?”Renaissance Quarterly, Vol.24, NO.3, pp.317-326. Behuniak-Long Susan 1989 “The Significance of Lucrezia in Machiavelli’s‘La Mandragola’”, The Review of Politics. Vol.51, No.2, pp.264-280. Carnes Lord 1979 “On Machiavelli’s Mandragola”, The Journal of Politics, Vol.41, No3, pp.806-827. Chiu Chin-jung 2012 “Freud on Shakespeare: An Approach to Psychopathetic Charaters”, Humanities and Social Science, 5-1, 33-56. Frisch Morton J. 1993 “Shakespeare’s Richard III and the soul of the Tyrant”, Interpretation, Vol.20,No3,pp275-284. Mindle Grant. B 1993 “Shakespeare’s Demonic prince”, Interpretation, Vol.20, No3, pp259-274. Whit Howard. B 1971 “Macbeth and the tyrannical man”, Interpretation, Vol.2, pp143-149. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6219 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 愛慾(eros)激發人類追求權力與愛情,本文認為權力與愛情是為互見關係。從經典理論看待權力與愛情有三種相似樣態,皆由崇高、本能與貶抑的方向出發。柏拉圖、盧梭視二者為對理想、美善的追求;尼采、佛洛伊德則主張二者皆是人類的本能,無所謂優劣評價之分;聖•奧古斯丁則以政治神學的觀點批判二者為人類的墮落、粗鄙行徑。
然而,經典理論對權力與愛情所陳述的三分法無法精確掌握真實人生裡變動的情狀,故本文嘗試以文學劇本來探討愛慾的搏動,馬基維利、莎士比亞即是融合政治思想於文學作品的先行者,且內容同樣描繪王侯將相競逐權力與愛情的實境。因此,其後章節從莎士比亞的多部劇本中分析政治菁英追求權力與愛情的「過程」、「結果」與「意義」。 於「過程」中,權力與愛情彼此為縮影。在持續變動的競逐中,人在權力中的行為猶如在愛情裡一般,用盡一切社會所學,且具體而微地運用在追求愛情。因此,兩個人的愛慾是愛情,若放大至集體社會中,便是多人政治慾望的相互角力。追逐二者的「結果」必然是賭徒豪賭後的勝敗結局,拋擲一切追求所欲物。孤注一擲的投入導致追逐行動迫近危險境地,賭徒面臨諸多關鍵的抉擇「to be or not to be?」。而愛慾催化激情,使得追逐行動往往把一己推向死亡的結局。此追逐戰的「意義」是愛慾催逼出「自我揭露」(Self-disclosure),把內在不為人知、己知的人格面貌掏出,證成自我;再經由一連串與外界的互動,與揭露後的人格進行對話、修正與調整,形塑出獨有的「自我樹立」(Self-enactment)。政治菁英畢生戮力追求所欲之權力與愛情,饜足一己的慾望勝過生之慾,愛慾壓抑了人類與生俱來的生存慾望,愛慾的興亡是己任,個人的生死早已棄之度外。 「情場」如「政壇」,在愛情裡看見權力的運作;在政壇裡望見有如愛情的苦苦相逼、生死相許。回到初始的驅力,愛慾終其一生與生之慾纏鬥,孰輕孰重,唯有親履之人方可知曉。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this thesis is about political elites who pursue the power and love under the drive of “eros”. It is likely that pursuing power is similar to pursuing love. That is to say, power and love elucidate each other.
First of all, power and love are categorized into three similar images in the canons, they mutually interpret. However, canons can hardly describe the complication and dynamic situation of life. As a result, the thesis tries to propose a “situated theories” found in literatures to enhance the lack of canons. Machiavelli and Shakespeare’s dramas could be the bridge between the “canonic theories” and “situated theories” of power and love. Their dramas indicate the meaning of politics. In the last three chapters, I found political elites’ process, results and meanings of pursuing love and power from the description in dramas. In the process, eros includes in many characters. Pursuing power and love are like micro-cosmos, love and power are epitomes of each other. Just as competing in political field, we make the best of social skills for pursuing love. I conclude that eros between two lovers is love, and eros among people is politics. Political elites pursue eros without hesitation and disregard the consequence often lead to danger. Political elites face a tremendous question: “to be or not to be”? So pursuing power and love is like gambling. That means political elites encounter unmasking moment when pursuing power and love. Through this action, they experience from self-disclosure to self-enactment and fulfill themselves consequently. Pursuing eros usually represses the instinct of self-preserving, so in the end such pursuing actions are usually causing the deaths of political elites. In conclusion, eros has great impact on political elites, however, situated description are not words, only men who experience of approaching eros and death simultaneously can understand the myth of eros. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:23:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R98322025-1.pdf: 2630250 bytes, checksum: f3bd5867bd630832b7d7d2a0ca7bbd2f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 緒論 權力與愛情的互見性格:一個描繪式的敘述 1
第一章 經典中權力的三種形象 7 第一節 權力的崇高性 7 第二節 權力的存有性 12 第三節 權力的宰制性 20 第二章 經典中愛情的三種形象 27 第一節 頌揚之愛 28 第二節 本能之愛 36 第三節 貪婪之愛 42 第三章 從經典理論到實境描繪: 馬基維利與莎士比亞的文學浮世繪 47 第一節 愛慾(eros)的生成 47 第二節 權力與愛情的「實境描繪」(situated theory of power and love) 55 第三節 近代實境描繪之始—馬基維利 59 第四節 莎士比亞作為政治思想家—莎劇中的權力與愛情 64 權力與愛情的追逐(一):過程 第四章 芥子納須彌(micro-cosmos): 人際關係的精密計算與人際技巧的濃縮體現 71 第一節 愛情即政治—愛慾、鬥智與匹敵交鋒 72 第二節 政治、愛情與「圍城」—愛慾與嫉妒 85 第三節 兩人間的愛慾是愛情;眾人的愛慾競逐是政治 90 權力與愛情的追逐(二):結果 第五章 人生中的豪賭(To be or not to be):權力與愛情的高度危險性 99 第一節 亡命之徒,為賭而生 100 第二節 “To be or not to be”—行動的激化 107 權力與愛情的追逐(三):意義 第六章 揭紗時刻(unmasking moment): 我贏故我在,我愛故我在 117 第一節 我贏故我在,我愛故我在—“Self-disclosure”與“Self-enactment” 118 第二節 以「愛慾」饜足為己任,置個人生死於度外 134 結語 以愛情刻劃政治;以政治隱喻愛情 145 參考書目 151 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 個人的即政治的:
從經典理論到實境描繪下的權力與愛情 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Personal is the Political:
From Canonic Theories to Situated Theories of Power and Love | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許國賢,陳妙芬 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 愛慾,實境理論,自我揭露,自我樹立, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | eros,situated theories,self-disclosure,self-enactment, | en |
dc.relation.page | 162 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-07-09 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf | 2.57 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。