請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/62171
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 沈聖峰(Sheng-Feng Shen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Te-pei Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳德沛 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T13:31:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-07-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-06-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Abram , G. Boivin, J. Moiroux, and J. Brodeur, 2017. Behavioural effects of temperature on ectothermic animals: unifying thermal physiology and behavioural
plasticity. Biological Reviews 92: 1859-1876. 2. Angilletta, Jr., T. D. Steury, M. W. Sears, 2004. Temperature, Growth Rate, and Body Size in Ectotherms: Fitting Pieces of a Life-History Puzzle. Integrative and Comparative Biology 44: 498-509. 3. Angilletta Jr., T. Hill, M. A. Robson, 2002a. Is physiological performance optimized by thermoregulatory behavior?: a case of the eastern fence lizard, Sceloporus undulates. Journal of Thermal Biology 27: 199-204. 4. Angilletta Jr., P. H. Niewiarowski, and C. A. Navas, 2002b. The evolution of thermal physiology in ectotherms. Journal of Thermal Biology 27: 249-268 5. Bennet, 1980. The thermal dependence of behavioral performance in small lizards. Animal. Behaviour 28: 752-762. 6. Bennett, 1990. The dependence of locomotor capacity. American Journal of Physiological Society 28: 253-258. 7. Blouin-Demers, P. J. Weatherhead, and H. A. McCracken, 2003. A test of the thermal coadaptation hypothesis with black rat snakes (Elaphe obsoleta) and northern water snakes (Nerodia sipedon). Journal of Thermal Biology 28: 331-340 8. Breeuwer, M. M. P. D. Heijmans, B. J. M. Robroek, and F. Berendse, 2008. The effect of temperature on growth and competition between Sphagnum species. Oecologia 156:155–167. 9. Clusella-Trullas, J. H. van Wyk, and J.R. Spotila, 2007. Thermal melanism in ectotherms. Journal of Thermal Biology 32: 235-245. 10. Castaneda, M. A. Ladies, and F. Bozinovic, 2004. Adaptive latitudinal shifts in the thermal physiology of a terrestrial isopod. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6: 579-593. 11. Du, S.J. Yan, X. Ji, 1999. Selected body temperature, thermal tolerance and thermal dependence of food assimilation and locomotor performance in adult blue-tailed skinks, Eumeces elegans. Journal of Thermal Biology 25: 197-202. 12. Dubey, and R. Shine, 2011. Predicting the effects of climate change on reproductive fitness of an endangered montane lizard, Eulamprus leuraensis (Scincidae). Climatic Change 107: 531-547. 13. Farmer, and D. R. Carrier, 2000. Ventilation and gas exchange during treadmill locomotion in the American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). The Journal of Experimental Biology 203: 1671-1678. 14. Farmer, and J. W. Hicks. Circulatory impairment induced by exercise in the lizard Iguana iguana. The Journal of Experimental Biology 203: 2691-2697. 15. Frick, D. S. Reynolds, and T. H. Kunz, 2010. Influence of climate and reproductive timing on demography of little brown myotis Myotis lucifugus. Journal of Animal Ecology 79: 128-136. 16. García-Robledo, E. K. Kuprewicz, C. L. Staines, T. L. Erwin, and W. J. Kress, 2016. Limited tolerance by insects to high temperatures across tropical elevational gradients and the implications of global warming for extinction. PNAS 113: 680-685. 17. Gilbert , and D. B. Miles, 2016. Food, temperature and endurance: effects of food deprivation on the thermal sensitivity of physiological performance. Functional Ecology 30: 1790–1799. 18. Gunderson, and M. Leal, 2015. Patterns of Thermal Constraint on Ectotherm Activity. The American Naturalist 185: 653-664. 19. Gunderson, and M. Leal, 2016. A conceptual framework for understanding thermal constraints on ectotherm activity with implications for predicting response to global change. Ecology Letters 19: 111-120. 20. Huey, and J. G. Kingsolver, 1989. Evolution of Thermal Sensitivity of Ectotherm Performance. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4: 131-135. 21. Huey, P. H. Niewiarowski, J. Kaufmann, and J. C. Herron, 1989. Thermal Biology of Nocturnal Ectotherms: Is Sprint Performance of Geckos Maximal at Low Body Temperatures?. Physiological Zoology 62: 488-504. 22. Hwang, and S.F. Shiao, 2010. Dormancy and the influence of photoperiod and temperature on sexual maturity in Nicrophorus nepalensis (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Insect Science 18: 225-233. 23. Ji, W. Zhou, G. He, and H. Gu, 1993. Food intake, assimilation efficiency, and growth of Junvenile lizards Takadromus septenrionalis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 105A: 283-285. 24. Kaufmann, and A. F. Bennett, 1989. The Effect of Temperature Acclimation on Locomotor Performance in Xantusia vigilis, the Desert Night Lizard. Physiological Zoology 62: 1047-1058. 25. Kearney and M. Predavec, 2000. Do Nocturnal Ectotherms Thermoregulate? A Study of The Temperate Gecko Christinus marmoratus. Ecology 81: 2984-2996. 26. Klein, I. Steffan‐Dewenter, and T. Tscharntke, 2006. Bee pollination and fruit set of Coffea arabica and C. canephora (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany 90: 153-157. 27. KUDO, Y. NISHIKAWA, T. KASAGI, and S. KOSUGE, 2004. Does seed production of spring ephemerals decrease when spring comes early?. Ecological Research 19: 255-259. 28. Kujal, B. Heinrich, J. G. Duman, 1988. Behavioural Thermoregulation in the Freeze – tolerance Arctic caterpillar, Gynaephora groenlandica. Journal of Experimental Biology 138: 181-193. 29. Lachenicht, S. Clusella-Trullas, L. Boardman, C. Le Roux, and J.S. Terblanche, 2010. Effects of acclimation temperature on thermal tolerance, locomotion performance and respiratory metabolism in Acheta domesticus L. (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 56: 822-830. 30. Lagerspetz, 2006. What is thermal acclimation?. Journal of Thermal Biology 31: 332-336. 31. Lang, B. C. Rall, and U. Brose, 2012. Warming effects on consumption and intraspecific interference competition depend on predator metabolism. Journal of Animal Ecology 81: 516–523. 32. Lemoine, and D. E. Burkepile, 2012. Temperature‐induced mismatches between consumption and metabolism reduce consumer fitness. Ecology 93: 2483-2489. 33. López, E. Civantos, and J. Martín, 2002. Body temperature regulation in the amphisbaenian Trogonophis wiegmanni. Canadian Journal of Zoology 80: 42-47. 34. Loyn, RG Runnalls, GY Forward, and J Tyers, 1983. Territorial bell miners and other birds affecting populations of insect prey. Science 221: 1411-1413. 35. Menéndez, 2007. How are insects responding to global warming?. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 150: 355-365. 36. Memmott, P. G. Craze, N. M. Waser, and M. V. Price, 2007. Global warming and the disruption of plant–pollinator interactions. Ecology Letters 10: 710–717 37. Mills, 2005. Changes in the timing of spring and autumn migration in North American migrant passerines during a period of global warming. Ibis 147: 259- 269. 38. Morgan, T. E. Shelly, and L. S. Kimsey, 1985. Body temperature regulation, energy metabolism, and foraging in light-seeking and shade-seeking robber flies. Journal of Comparative Physiology B 155: 561-570. 39. Morgan, 1985. Body temperature Regulation and terrestrial Activity in the Ectothermic Beetle Cicindela tranquebarica. Physiological Zoology 58: 29-37. 40. Musolin, 2007. Insects in a warmer world: ecological, physiological and lifehistory responses of true bugs (Heteroptera) to climate change. Global Change Biology 13: 1565-1585. 41. Ohlberger, 2013. Climate warming and ectotherm body size – from individual physiology to community ecology. Functional Ecology 27: 991-1001. 42. Peng and Srygley, 1990. Predation and the Flight, Morphology, and Temperature of Neotropical Rain-Forest Butterflies. The American Naturalist 135: 748-765. 43. Peterson, Charles C., and Husak, Jerry F., 2006. Locomotor Performance and Sexual Selection: Individual Variation in Sprint Speed of Collared Lizards (Crotaphytus Collaris). Copeia 2 : 216-224. 44. Pinheiro, 1996. Palatablility and escaping ability in Neotropical butterflies: tests with wild kingbirds (Tyrannus rnelancholicus, Tyrannidae). Biological journal of the Linnean Society 59: 351-365. 45. Rezende, L. E. Castaneda, and M. Santos, 2014. Tolerance landscapes in thermal ecology. Functional Ecology 28: 799-809. 46. Root, J.T. Price, K. R. Hall, S.H. Schneider, C. Rosenzweig, and J.A. Pounds, 2003. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421: 57-60. 47. Scaven, and N. E. Rafferty, 2013. Physiological effects of climate warming on flowering plants and insect pollinators and potential consequences for their interactions. Current Zoology 59: 418–426. 48. Schmitz, A. Beckerman, A. O’Brien, 1997. Behaviorally Mediated Trophic Cascades: Effects of Predation Risk on Food Web Interactions. Ecology 78: 1388– 1399. 49. Shaver, J. Canadell, F. S. Chapin, J. Gurevitch, J. Harte, G. Henry, P. Ineson, S. Jonasson, J. Melillo, L. Pitelka, and L. Rustad, 2000. Global Warming and Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis: Ecosystem responses to global warming will be complex and varied. Ecosystem warming experiments hold great potential for providing insights on ways terrestrial ecosystems will respond to upcoming decades of climate change. Documentation of initial conditions provides the context for understanding and predicting ecosystem responses. BioScience 50: 871–882. 50. Sokolov, 2005. Effect of Global Warming on the Timing of Migration and Breeding of Passerine Birds in the 20th Century. Entomological Review 86: 59-81. 51. Stevenson, 1985. The Relative Importance of Behavioral and Physiological Adjustments Controlling Body Temperature in Terrestrial Ectotherms. The American Naturalist 126: 362-386. 52. Traill, M. L. M. Lim, N. S. Sodhi, and C. J. A. Bradshaw, 2010. Mechanisms driving change: altered species interactions and ecosystem function through global warming. Journal of Animal Ecology 79: 937-947. 53. Tsai H-Y, DR Rubenstein, Y-M Fan, T-N Yuan, B-F Chen, Y Tang, I-C Chen, SF Shen, 2020. Locally-adapted Reproductive Photoperiodism Determines Population Vulnerability to Climate Change in Burying Beetles. Nature Communications. In press. 54. Van Berkum, R. B. Huey, and B. A. Adams, 1986. Physiological Consequences of Thermoregulation in a Tropical Lizard (Ameiva festiva). Physiological Zoology 59: 464-472. 55. Van Damme, D. Bauwens, and R. F. Verheyen, 1991. The Thermal Dependence of Feeding behavior, Food consumption and Gut-Passage Time in the Lizard Lacerta vivipara Jacquin. Functional Ecology 5: 507-517. 56. Zeuss, R. Brandl, M. Brändle, C. Rahbek, and S. Brunzel, 2014. Global warming favours light-coloured insects in Europe. Nature Communications 5: 3874. 57. Zhang, 2013. Phylum Arthropoda. Zootaxa 3703: 017-026. 58. 黃文伯. 2007. 環境變遷監測-氣溫對狹溫性甲蟲活動之影響. 林業研究專刊 14:7-10. 59. 黃文伯, and 葛兆年. 環境與生態學報. 2011. 哈盆自然保留區屍食性甲蟲物 種生物多樣性監測與氣候變遷之關係. 4:17-34. 60. 范郁盟. 2019. 尼泊爾埋葬蟲族群在兩島嶼上的溫度適應. 台灣大學生態與演 化生物學研究所學位論文. 61. 蔡祥瑜. 2017. 尼泊爾埋葬蟲繁殖策略的地區適應演化. 台灣大學生態與演化 生物學研究所學位論文. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/62171 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 摘要
全球暖化對生態系與生物帶來了巨大的衝擊。在全球暖化日益嚴重的情況 下,生物的生理表現如何適應環境溫度,是預測全球暖化對生物帶來的傷害的重要問題。過去關於生物生理的溫度適應較多以存活數量最為指標,對於不同溫度下的活動狀態較少被討論,但若要探討生物在環境的適存度,不能僅從存活與否的層面討論,生物的活動狀態亦是生物續存的必要關鍵之一。擁有良好的活動力,才可獲得生存資源與繁殖的機會,或是躲避天敵。過去關於環境溫度對生物表現的影響有兩種假說:生物具有多個最佳表現溫度的多種最佳溫度假說(multiple optima hypothesis)以及最適當體溫即為所有生物表現最佳表現體溫的溫度共同適應假說(thermal coadaptation hypothesis)。我們以狹溫性昆蟲尼泊爾 埋葬蟲為研究對象測試這兩個假說,比較進行不同活動時的最佳表現溫度的異同,我們發現—埋葬蟲進行不同活動的最佳表現溫度符合多種最佳溫度假說。埋葬蟲在慢速奔跑時,若沒起飛,在16℃可以持續走動的時間最久;而埋葬蟲快速奔跑時,在20℃最容易起飛。結果顯示,埋葬蟲在進行日常活動時的最佳表現溫度和繁殖最佳表現溫度一樣為16℃;而面對緊急狀況的最佳表現溫度為20℃,充分顯示出埋葬蟲活動時的最佳表現溫度符合多種最佳溫度假說,由此說明,想要了解氣候變遷對生物的影響,不能只從某一個生理特徵去探討,必須充分收集資訊才能預測全球暖化對生物的傷害,以利之後朝正確的方向去制定環境保護政策。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract
Global warming has made a strong impact on the organism and ecosystems.Understanding the thermal adaptation of species’ physiology can help us predict the species’ vulnerability under the climate change. Most of the previous studies about thermal adaptation focused on survival rate as in index of fitness. However, locomotor performance is one of the fitness-related traits of organisms. The individuals with better performance on locomotor activity will get more resource for survive and have higher opportunity for reproduction, also escape from predators more easily. Based on the past research, there were two hypotheses about thermal adaptation, which were “multiple optima” and “thermal coadaptation”. The multiple optima hypothesis refers to that there are many optimal temperature of organisms’ physiological performance, whereas the thermal coadaptation hypothesis refers to that the preferred body temperature of organisms is the optimal temperature to all physiological performance. To test these two hypothesis, we investigated the locomotor performance of two different speed (slow speed: 1.5m/min; extreme speed: 2.0m/min) of burying beetle (Nicrophorus nepalensis Hope, 1831) to test these two hypotheses about physiological adaptation. We found that under the slow speed, burying beetles was the lowest advantage at 12℃ and it performed the best at 16℃. However, under the extreme speed, we found that the burying beetles performed the best at 20℃. Our results indicated that the optimal temperature of daily activity is 16℃, which is similar to the optimal temperature of breeding, and the optimal temperature of running is 20℃. Based on our result, we should not focus on only one of the physiological traits of the organisms if we want to understand more about how global warming influence organisms. We must collect more information about thermal adaptation of organism so that we can make the policy of protecting environment more accurately. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T13:31:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-109-R06b44019-1.pdf: 1415433 bytes, checksum: 9f9a7ababec08b80c3da868c2e889a69 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………………… 1
誌謝…………………………………………………………………………….…. 2 中文摘要………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Abstract...……………………………………………………………………….…. 5 目錄………………………………………………………………………………... 7 圖目錄……………………………………………………………………………... 9 第一章 前言…………………………………………………………………….. 10 第二章 材料與方法…………………………………………………………….. 12 2-1 研究物種..………………………………………………………………....... 12 2-2 室內族群建立…………………………………………………..………...… 12 2-3 跑步機實驗..…………………………………………………………...…… 13 2-4 影片分析..………………………………………………………...………… 14 2-4.1 埋葬蟲慢跑時體溫隨時間的變化…………………….…………..… 14 2-4.2 埋葬蟲運動後體溫的變化以及運動後的狀態..…………...……...... 14 2-5 統計分析..…………………………………………………………………... 14 第三章 結果..…………………………………………….…………………....... 15 3-1 慢速奔跑的運動表現..…………………………………………….…......… 15 3-1.1 三個環境溫度下有起飛埋葬蟲起飛時的相對體溫..………….…… 15 3-1.2 三個環境溫度下沒起飛埋葬蟲達到上限時的相對體溫..…………. 15 3-1.3 三個環境溫度下埋葬蟲的起飛比例..………………………….…… 15 3-1.4 三個環境溫度下有起飛的埋葬蟲跑動至起飛的時間….….…..…... 16 3-1.5 三個環境溫度下沒起飛的埋葬蟲持續跑動時間..……………….… 16 8 3-2 快速奔跑的運動表現..…………………………………………….……..… 16 3-2.1 埋葬蟲起飛時的相對體溫..………………………………………..... 16 3-2.2 三個溫度下埋葬蟲的起飛比例..…………………………………..... 16 3-2.3 三個溫度下自開始跑動至起飛所需的時間..……………………..... 17 第四章 討論..…………………………………………………………...……..... 18 參考文獻…………………………………………………………...………….….. 22 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 尼泊爾埋葬蟲不同溫度下的運動表現 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Locomotor performance of burying beetles (Nicrophorus
nelpalensis Hope 1831) in different environmental temperatures | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳一菁,王慧瑜 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 溫度適應,適存度,活動狀態,相對體溫,最佳表現溫度, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | thermal adaptation,fitness,locomotor performance,relative body temperature,optimal temperature, | en |
dc.relation.page | 40 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202001030 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-06-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-109-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.38 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。