Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 工業工程學研究所
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61940
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor周雍強
dc.contributor.authorChia-An Linen
dc.contributor.author林家安zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T13:19:41Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-31
dc.date.copyright2013-07-31
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2013-07-26
dc.identifier.citation英文部分
[1] Arreola-Risa, A., and DeCroix, G. A., 1998, “Inventory management under random supply disruptions and partial backorders,” Naval Research Logistics, Vol. 45, No. 7, pp. 687-703.
[2] Azimi, P., Ghanbari, M. R., and Mohammadi H., 2012, “Simulation modeling for analysis of a (Q, r) inventory system under supply disruption and customer differentiation with partial backordering,” Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, Vol. 2012, No. 11, pp. 1-10.
[3] Bagchi, U., and Gutierrez, G., 1992, “Effect of increasing component commonality on service level and holding cost,” Naval Research Logistics, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 815-832.
[4] Baker, K. R., Magazine, M. J., and Nuttle, H. L. W., 1986, “The effect of commonality on safety stock in a simple inventory model,” Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 982-988.
[5] Bernstein, F., Kok, A. G., and Xie, L., 2011, “The role of component commonality in product assortment decisions,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, Vol. 13,No. 2, pp.261-270.
[6] Bish, E. K., and wang, Q., 2004, “Optimal investment strategies for flexible resources, considering pricing and correlated demands,” Operations Research, Vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 954-964.
[7] Chod, J., and Rudi, N., 2005, “Resource flexibility with responsive pricing,” Operations Research, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 532-548.
[8] Chopra, S., and Sodhi, M. M. S., 2004, “Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown,” MIT Sloan management review, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 53-61.
[9] Collier, D.A., 1982, “Aggregate safety stock levels and component part commonality,” Management Science, Vol. 28, No. 11, pp. 1296-1303.
[10] Desai, P., Kekre, S., Radhakrishnan, S., and Srinivasan, K., 2001, “Product differentiation and commonality in design: Balancing revenues and cost drivers,” Management Science, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 37-51.
[11] Deshpande, V., Cohen, M. A., and Donohue, K., 2003, “A threshold inventory rationing policy for service-differentiated demand classes,” Management Science, Vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 683-703.
[12] Fixson, S. K., 2006, “A roadmap for product architecture costing,” In Simpson, T. W., Siddique, Z., and Jiao, R. J. (eds), Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications, New York: Springer, pp. 305-333.
[13] Fixson, S. K., 2007, “Modularity and commonality research: Past developments and future opportunities,” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 85-111.
[14] Goyal, M., and Netessine, S., 2011, “Volume flexibility, product flexibility, or both: The role of demand correlation and product substitution,” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 180-193.
[15] Gullu, R., Onol, E., and Erkip, N., 1999, “Analysis of an inventory system under supply uncertainty,” Production Economics, Vol. 59, No. 1-3, pp. 377-385.
[16] Kim, K., and Chhajed, D., 2000, “Commonality in product design: Cost saving, valuation change and cannibalization,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 125, No. 3, pp. 602-621.
[17] Paul, J., 2008, “Supply chain disruption: Risk and management,” SCMS Journal of Indian Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 109-112.
[18] Salvador, F., Forza, C., and Rungtusanatham, M., 2002, “Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: theorizing beyond generic prescriptions,” Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 549-575.
[19] Van Mieghem, J. A., 1998, “Investment strategies for flexible resources,” Management Science, Vol. 44, No. 8, pp. 1071-1078.
[20] Van Mieghem, J. A., 2004, “Commonality strategies: Value drivers and equivalence with flexible capacity and inventory substitution,” Management Science, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 419-424.
[21] Van Mieghem, J. A., 2007, “Risk mitigation in newsvendor networks: Resource diversification, flexibility, sharing, and hedging,” Management Science, Vol. 53, No. 8, pp. 1269-1288.
[22] Weiss, H. J., and Rosenthal, E. C., 1992, “Optimal ordering policies when anticipating a disruption in supply or demand,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 370-382.
中文部分
[1] 薛飛,2010,“從危機中勝出:MIT的供應鏈風險管理學”,台北:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
[2] 張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鶯釧、吳聰敏,2004,“經濟學-理論與實務”,五版上冊,台北:翰蘆圖書出版有限公司總經銷,240-270。
網路
[1] 賴筱凡,2011,“泰國水災沖垮全球硬碟供應鏈-PC廠屋漏偏逢連夜雨”,十一月九日,今週刊七七七期。
http://magazine.sina.com/bg/businesstoday/777/20111113/1737114959.html
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61940-
dc.description.abstract這十年間天災、意外、蓄意攻擊接連出現在世界各地,現在的企業無法避免地要面對各種災變。尤其在這環環相扣的全球供應鏈中,任何一個環節出錯,都能牽一髮而動全身,此時企業如何快速回應發生機率低,但帶來高度衝擊的事故就變得極為重要了。
  過去,供應鏈管理的議題大都是探討如何有效降低庫存、減少前置時間、促進績效表現,著重於「減少成本、提高效率」。現今,隨著企業的全球化發展,相關的廠商數量變多,每一個環節都充滿變數,供應鏈越來越脆弱,導致「彈性、應變能力」成為新的重要議題。
  本文研究一間獨占廠商,生產兩種產品到高低階市場,兩產品有部分零件相同,因此可以享有經濟規模的效果,但是零件共通比例越高,產品品質的差異相對越小,使得市場變窄,廠商無法透過差別定價,以賺取更高的利潤。本研究將探討如何在經濟規模和差別定價中權衡,做出最適的零件共通程度,並運用共通零件的彈性配置,建造出有應變能力的供應鏈,以在變化莫測的全球市場上勝出,使供應中斷的危機轉為商機。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractOver the past decade, there were a lot of natural hazards, accidents, and terrorism around the word. The business environment is always changing and these changes create risk. Especially in the global supply chains, how to react to the low-probability high-damage disruption is important.
In the past, many researches of supply chain management discussed how to reduce inventory costs, shorten lead time, and improve performance, and they focused on reducing expenses and efficiently utilizing assets. Nowadays, the industries is moving toward to longer supply chains and facing increasingly uncertain supply. Therefore, the issue of resilience and risk handling of supply chain becomes an important topic.
This article we studied a monopoly industry in which the monopolist produces two products and sells the products to the market, which consists of a high segment and a low segment. A product designed with commonality can lower manufacturing cost due to the economies of scale. However, commonality makes the products more indistinguishable from one another. As a result, product designed with commonality may hinder the ability to extract price premiums through product differentiation. This research considers the trade-off between marketing and manufacturing and provides the optimal commonality so as to maximize the profit of monopolist. Otherwise, we discovered common part can mitigate risk through reallocation while disruption occurs. Using the strategies of commonality, supply chain will become more resilient and the crisis will be the business opportunity.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T13:19:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-102-R00546008-1.pdf: 1815121 bytes, checksum: dce313e185b05c355046d9c5232d1412 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013
en
dc.description.tableofcontents致謝 i
摘要 ii
ABSTRACT iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 問題背景 1
1.2 問題描述 2
1.3 研究目的 2
1.4 論文架構 3
第二章 文獻回顧 4
2.1 供應鏈中斷 4
2.1.1 供應鏈風險和風險起因 4
2.1.2 缺貨模型 6
2.2 供應鏈的彈性 11
2.2.1 彈性資源 13
2.2.2 模組化策略 17
2.3 共通零件 18
2.4 零件共通性和產品差異化的權衡 21
第三章 調配共通零件的避險策略 29
3.1 供應中斷下的零件配置模型 29
3.2 供應正常情況的分析 35
3.3 供應中斷情況的分析 39
3.3.1 產品差異大時的避險範圍(case 1) 43
3.3.2 產品差異小時的避險範圍(case 2) 44
3.4 供應中斷對利潤的影響 47
第四章 避險策略分析 55
4.1 單期決策 55
4.2 多期決策 58
第五章 結論與建議 61
5.1 研究結果 61
5.2 未來研究方向 62
參考文獻 63
附錄 66
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject共通零件zh_TW
dc.subject產品差異化zh_TW
dc.subject市場推廣zh_TW
dc.subject供應鏈中斷zh_TW
dc.subject供應鏈彈性zh_TW
dc.subject風險消弭zh_TW
dc.subjectmarketingen
dc.subjectresilienceen
dc.subjectproduct differentiationen
dc.subjectsupply chain disruptionen
dc.subjectcommon parten
dc.subjectrisk mitigationen
dc.title消弭供應中斷風險的共通零件策略分析zh_TW
dc.titleAn Analysis of the Common Part Strategy for Mitigating Supply Chain Disruptionsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear101-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee許錫美,蔣明晃,黃奎隆
dc.subject.keyword供應鏈中斷,風險消弭,供應鏈彈性,共通零件,市場推廣,產品差異化,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordsupply chain disruption,risk mitigation,resilience,common part,marketing,product differentiation,en
dc.relation.page68
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2013-07-26
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept工業工程學研究所zh_TW
Appears in Collections:工業工程學研究所

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ntu-102-1.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.77 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved