請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61718
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳珮瑛 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi Lin Ng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃一琳 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T13:10:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-06 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-06 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-07-31 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 內政部國土資訊系統社會經濟資料庫共通平台,2011。『100年9月全國十齡組分齡人口統計-鄉鎮市區』。台北:內政部統計處。
內政部營建署,2013。『專題報導:全球氣候變遷與濕地保育』。(http://www.cpami.gov.tw/)(2013/6/30)。 全國法規資料庫,2010。『國家公園法』。台北:全國法規資料庫。 行政院主計處中華民國統計資訊,2013。『1999年國民所得統計-平均每人所得』。台北:行政院主計處。 吳珮瑛,2009。『環境與自然資源值多少?-效益與價值衡量之概念、理論、方法與應用』。台中:財團法人新新台灣文化教育基金會。 吳珮瑛、鄧福麒,2003。「黑面琵鷺保護區生態旅遊規劃方案下居民參與和願付價值關係之檢視」,『戶外遊憩研究』。 16卷,4期,41-70。 吳珮瑛、蘇明達,2000a。「國家公園資源經濟效益評估: 以墾丁國家公園為例」。內政部營建署國家公園組補助研究計畫。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系。 吳珮瑛、蘇明達,2000b。「經驗累積之完整決策條件評估模型之設立-以墾丁國家公園資源經濟效益評估為例」,發表於2000年環境資源經濟、管理暨系統分析學術研討會。台北:中央研究院經濟研究所。12月20日。 吳珮瑛、蘇明達,2001a。「墾丁國家公園資源經濟效益評估:兼論資源保育之哲學觀與資源價值之內涵」,『國家公園學報』。11卷,1期,1-29。 吳珮瑛、蘇明達,2001b。『六十億元的由來:墾丁國家公園資源經濟價值評估』。台北市:前衛出版社。 吳珮瑛、蘇明達、鄧福麒、鄭琬方,2002。「條件評估法中近似理想誘導支付模式之建構:生物多樣性資源價值之探討與評估」。行政院國家科學委員會補助研究計畫。NSC91-2415-H-002-015-SSS。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系。 侯佩君、杜素豪、廖培珊、洪永泰、章英華,2008。「台灣鄉鎮市區類型之研究:「台灣社會變遷基本調查」第五期計畫之抽樣分層效果分析」,『調查研究-方法與應用』。23期,7-32。 洪志銘、蕭代基、林桓億、吳珮瑛、錢玉蘭、劉哲良、黃德秀、林妏怡、王詩君、劉昱新,2012。「環境影響評估與開發計畫的社會效益成本評估之應用及檢討分析專案工作計畫」。行政院環境保護署補助研究計畫。中華經濟研究院、中央研究院經濟研究所、國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所、國立臺北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所。 曹武賀,2005。『彰化縣平原自然步道導覽手冊』。彰化市:大葉大學。 莊玉珍、王惠芳,2001。『台灣的濕地』。台北:遠足文化事業有限公司。 張怡文、江穎慧、張金鶚,2009。「分量迴歸在大量估價模型之應用—非典型住宅估價之改進」『都市與計畫』。36卷,3期,281-304。 陳建良,2007。「1980年至2000年台灣擁屋家戶儲蓄行為之變遷—分量迴歸分析的新發現」,『住宅學報』。16卷,1期,57-78。 陳建良、管中閔,2006。「台灣工資函數與工資性別歧視的分量迴歸分析」,『經濟論文』。34卷,4期,435-468。 農委會林務局自然資源與生態資料庫。(http://erarc.epa.gov.tw/136/201011150105/archive/econgis_/index1.htm) (2012/10/3)。 臺灣國家公園,2009。內政部營建署。(http://np.cpami.gov.tw/)(2013/1/28)。 臺灣濕地學會,2009。社團法人臺灣濕地學會(http://www.wet.org.tw/)(2013/6/30)。 蘇明達,2003。「近似理想誘導支付條件評估模式之理論建構與實證檢驗:以黑面琵鷺保護區多樣性資源價值之探討為例」。博士論文,國立台灣大學農業經濟學研究所。 蘇一志,2008。「地方發展過程中的衝突與折衝:以恆春半島觀光空間之轉化為例」,『建築與城鄉研究學報』。14期,1-14。 Abrevaya, Jason, 2001. “The Effects of Demographics and Maternal Behavior on the Distribution of Birth Outcomes,” Empirical Economics. 26(1): 247-257. Arrow, Kenneth Joseph, Robert Solow, Paul R. Portney, Edward E. Leamer, Roy Radner and Howard Schuman, 1993. “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation,” Federal Register. 58(10): 4600-4614. Balmford, Andrew, Brendan Fisher, Rhys E. Green, Robin Naidoo, Bernardo Strassburg, R. Kerry Turner and Ana S. L. Rodrigues, 2011. “Bringing Ecosystem Services into the Real World: An Operational Framework for Assessing the Economic Consequences of Losing Wild Nature,” Environmental and Resource Economics. 48(2): 161-175. Bateman, Ian J. and Ian H. Langford, 1997. “Non-users’ Willingness to Pay for a National Park: An Application and Critique of the Contingent Valuation Method,” Regional Studies. 31(6): 571-582. Bateman, Ian J., Andrew P. Jones, Andrew A. Lovett, Iain R. Lake and Brett H. Day, 2002. “Applying Geographical Information Systems(GIS) to Environmental and Resource Economics,” Environmental and Resource Economics. 22(1): 219-269. Bateman, Ian J., Brett H. Day, Stavros Georgiou and Lain Lake, 2006. “The Aggregation of Environmental Benefit Values: Welfare Measures, Distance Decay and Total WTP,” Ecological Economics. 60(2): 450-460. Bateman, Ian J., Ian H. Langford, Andrew P. Jones and Geoffrey N. Kerr, 2001. “Bound and Path Effects in Double and Triple Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation,” Resource and Energy Economics. 23(3): 191-213. Bateman, Ian J., Ian H. Langford, Naohito Nishikawa and Iain Lake, 2000. “The Axford Debate Revisited: A Case Study Illustrating Different Approaches to the Aggregation of Benefits Data,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 43(2): 291-302. Bateman, Ian J., Philip Cooper, Stavros Gorgiou, Stale Navrud, Gregory L. Poe, Richard C. Ready, Pere Riera, Mandy Ryan and Christian A. Vossler, 2005. “Economic Valuation of Policies for Managing Acidity in Remote Mountain Lakes: Examining Validity through Scope Sensitivity Testing,” Aquatic Sciences. 67(3): 274-291. Bateman, Ian, Ken Willis and Guy Garrod, 1994. “Consistency between Contingent Valuation Estimates: A Comparison of Two Studies of UK National Parks,” Regional Studies. 28(5): 457-474. Bishop, Richard C. and Thomas A. Heberlein, 1979. “Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 61(5): 926-930. Bobbink, Roland, Dennis F. Whigham, Boudewijn Beltman and Jos T. A. Verhoeven, 2006. “Wetland Functioning in Relation to Biodiversity Conservation and Restoration,” Ecological Studies. 191: 1-12. Carson, Richard T., Michael W. Hanemann, Robert C. Mitchell, 1986. “Determining the Demand for Public Goods by Simulating Referendums at Different Tax Prices,” Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego. Cited by Trudy A. Cameron and J. Quiggin, 1994. “Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a “Dichotomous Choice with Follow-Up” Questionnaire,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 27: 218-234. Chamberlain, Gary, 1994. “Quantile Regression, Censoring and the Structure of Wages,” in Advance in Econometrics Sixth World Congress Volume 1, pp171-210. Edited by Christopher A. Sims. New York: Cambridge University Press. Chape, Stuart, Simon Blyth, Lucy Fish, Phillip Fox and Mark Spalding, 2003. 2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas. Cambridge, United Kingdom: IUCN Publications Services Unit. Chernozhukov, Victor and Han Hong, 2002. “Three-step Censored Quantile Regression and Extramarital Affairs,” Journal of the American Statistical Association. 97: 872-882. Clawson, M., 1959. Methods of Measuring the Demand for and Value of Outdoor Recreation. Washington, DC. Resources for the Future, 36P. Cochran, William G., 1963. Sampling Techniques, 2nd Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Costanza, Robert, Ralph D’Arge, Rudolf de Groot, Stephen Farber, Monica Grasso, Bruce Hannon, Karin Limburg, Shahid Naeem, Robert V. O’Neill, Jose Paruelo, Robert G. Raskin, Paul Sutton and Marjan van den Belt, 1997. “The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital,” Nature. 387: 253-260. Craig, John, 1985. 1981 Socio-economic Classification of Local and Health Authorities of Great Britain: Studies on Medical and Population Subjects No 48. London: Great Britain Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Crooker, John R. and Joseph A. Herriges, 2004. “Parametric and Semi-parametric Estimation of Willingness to Pay in the Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Framework,” Environmental and Resources Economics. 27(4): 451-480. De Groot, Rudolf S., Matthew A. Wilson and Roelof M.J. Boumans, 2002. “A Typology for the Classification, Description and Valuation of Ecosystem Functions, Goods and Services,” Ecological Economics. 41(3): 393-408. De la Rica, Sara, Juan J. Dolado and Venesa Llorens, 2008. “Ceilings or Floors? Gender Wage Gaps by Education in Spain,” Journal of Population Economics. 21(3): 751-776. Dobson, Andrew P., 1996. Conservation and Biodiversity. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. Drake, Lars, 1992. “The Non-market Value of the Swedish Agricultural Landscape,” European Review of Agricultural Economics. 19(3): 351-364. Dudley, Nigel, 2008. Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Publications Services. Dunn, William N., 1994. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction 2nd Edition. California: Person Education. Farber, Stephen, Robert Costanza, Daniel L. Childers, Jon Erickson, Katherine Gross, Morgan Grove, Charles S. Hopkinson, James Kahn, Stephanie Pincetl, Austin Troy, Paige Warren and Matthew Wilson, 2006. “Linking Ecology and Economics for Ecosystem Management,” BioScience. 56(2): 121-133. Garcia, Jaume, Pedro J. Hernandez and Angel Lopez-Nicolas, 2001. “How Wide is the Gap? An Investigation of Gender Wage Differences using Quantile Regression,” Empirical Economics. 26(1), 149-167. Georgiou, Stavros, Ian Bateman, Matthew Cole and David Hadley, 2000. “Contingent Ranking and Valuation of River Water Quality Improvements: Testing for Scope Sensitivity, Ordering and Distance Decay Effects,” Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), Norwich (United Kingdom). CSERGE-WP-GEC--2000-18. Hammack, Judd and Gardner Mallard Brown Jr., 1974. Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bio-Economic Analysis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Hanemann, Michael, John Loomis and Barbara Kanninen, 1991. “Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 73(4): 1255-1263. Hanley, Nick, Felix Schlapfer and James Spurgeon, 2003. “Aggregating the Benefits of Environmental Improvements: Distance-decay Functions for Use and Non-use Values,” Journal of Environmental Management. 68(3): 297-304. Hao, Lingxin and Daniel Q. Naiman, 2007. Quantile Regression: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No 149. United States: SAGE Publications, Inc. Helliwell, D. R., 1969. “Valuation of Wildlife Resources,” Regional Studies. 3(1): 41-47. Hoehn, John P. and Alan Randall, 1987. “A Satisfactory Benefit Cost Indicator from Contingent Valuation,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 14(3): 226-247. Hotelling, H., 1949. Letter to the National Park Service. An Econometric Study of the Monetary Evaluation of Recreation in the National Parks. United States Department of Interior. National Park Service and Recreational Planning Division. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) and World Commission on Protected Areas (WCMC), 1994. Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Publications Services. Israel, Glenn D., 1992. “Determining Sample Size,” Program Evaluation and Organizational Development, Fact Sheet PEOD-6, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Jakobsson, Kristin M. and Andrew K. Dragun, 1996. Contingent Valuation and Endangered Species: Methodological Issues and Applications. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Jorgensen, Sisse Liv, Soren Boye Olsen, Jacob Ladenburg, Louise Martinsen, Stig Roar Svenningsen and Berit Hasler, 2013. “Spatially Induced Disparities in Users' and Non-users' WTP for Water Quality Improvements—Testing the Effect of Multiple Substitutes and Distance Decay,” Ecological Economics. 92:58-66. Kanninen, Barbara J., 1995. “Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 28:114-125. Kniivila, Matleena, 2006. “Users and Non-users of Conservation Areas: Are there Differences in WTP, Motives and the Validity of Responses in CVM Surveys?” Ecological Economics. 59(4): 530-539. Koenker, Roger and Gilbert Jr. Bassett, 1978. “Regression Quantiles,” Econometrica. 46(1): 33-50. Koenker, Roger and Gilbert Jr. Bassett, 1982. “Robust Tests for Heteroscedasticity Based on Regression Quantiles,” Econometrica. 50(1): 43-61. Koenker, Roger and Kevin F. Hallock, 2001. “Quantile Regression,” Journal of Economic Perspectives. 15(4): 143-156. Koenker, Roger, 2005. Quantile Regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Krutilla, John V., 1967. “Conservation Reconsidered,” The American Economic Review. 57(4): 777-786. Kwak, Seung-Jun, Junsoo Lee and Clifford S. Russell, 1997. “Dealing with Censored Data from Contingent Valuation Surveys: Symmetrically-Trimmed Least Squares Estimation,” Southern Economic Journal. 63(3): 743-750. Langford, Ian H., Ian J. Bateman and Hugh D. Langford, 1996. “A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Triple-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation,” Environmental and Resource Economics. 7(3): 197-211. Last, Anne-Kathrin, 2007. “The Monetary Value of Cultural Goods: A Contingent Valuation Study of the Municipal Supply of Cultural Goods in Lueneburg, Germany,” University of Lueneburg Working Paper Series in Economics No 63. ISSN-1960-5508. University of Lueneburg. Lewis, E. B., 1982. “Control of Body Segment Differentiation in Drosophila by the Bithorax Gene Complex,” Progress in Clinical and Biological Research. 85: 269-288. Long, J. Scott, 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. California: Sage Publications, Inc. Loomis, John B., 2000. “Vertically Summing Public Good Demand Curves: An Empirical Comparison of Economic Versus Political Jurisdictions,” Land Economics. 76(2): 312-321. Maynard, Simone, David James and Andrew Davidson, 2010. “The Development of an Ecosystem Services Framework for South East Queensland,” Environmental Management. 45(5): 881-895. McConnell, E. Kenneth, 1983. “Existence and Bequest Value,” in Managing Air Quality and Scenic Resources at National Park and Wilderness Areas. Edited by Robert, D. R. and G. C. Lakuraine. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis Report. Washington D.C, Island Press. Mitchell, Robert C. and Richard T. Carson, 1981. “An Experiment in Determining Willingness to Pay for National Water Quality Improvement,” paper presented at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D. C.. Mitchell, Robert C. and Richard T. Carson, 1984. “A Contingent Valuation Estimate of National Freshwater Benefits,” paper presented at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D. C.. Mitchell, Robert C. and Richard T. Carson, 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future. Mitsch, William J. and James G. Gosselink, 2000. Wetlands. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Moore, Peter D., 2006. Wetlands: Biomes of the Earth. New York: Chelsea House. Moore, Rebecca, Bill Provencher and Richard C. Bishop, 2011. “Valuing a Spatially Variable Environmental Resource: Reducing Non-Point-Source Pollution in Green Bay, Wisconsin,” Land Economics. 87(1): 45-59. National Park Service, 2013. United States Department of the Interior (http://www.nps.gov/index.htm) (2013/1/28). National Park Village Tongariro World Heritage Area, 2013. National Park Business Association Inc. (http://www.nationalpark.co.nz/) (2013/1/28). NSW National Park and Wildlife Service, 2013. Office of Environment and Heritage, NSW Government. (http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/nationalparks/) (2013/1/28). O’Garra, Tanya and Susana Mourato, 2007. “Public Preferences for Hydrogen Buses: Comparing Interval Data, OLS and Quantile Regression Approaches,” Environmental and Resource Economics. 36(4): 389-411. Parks Canada, 2013. Government of Canada (http://www.pc.gc.ca/) (2013/1/28). Pate, Jennifer and John Loomis, 1997. “The Effect of Distance on Willingness to pay Values: A Case Study of Wetlands and Salmon in California,” Ecological Economics. 20(3): 199-207. Pearce, David and Dominic Moran, 1994. The Economic Value of Biodiversity. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd. Perlman, Dan L. and Glenn Adelson, 1997. Biodiversity: Exploring Values and Priorities in Conservation. Massachusetts: Blackwell Science. Phillips, Adrian, 2004. “The History of the International System of Protected Area Management Categories,” Parks. 14(3): 4-13. Powell, James L., 1986. “Censored Quantile Regression,” Journal of Econometrics. 32(1): 143-155. Pruckner, Gerald J., 1995. “Agricultural Landscape Cultivation in Austria: An Application of the CVM,” European Review of Agricultural Economics. 22(2): 173-190. Randall, Alan, Berry Ives and Clyde Eastman, 1974. “Bidding Games for Valuation of Aesthetic Environmental Improvements,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 1(2): 132-149. Randall, A., 1986. “Human Preference, Economics, and Preservation of Species,” In the Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity. Edited by B. G. Norton. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press. Scarpa, Riccardo and Ian Bateman, 2000. “Efficiency Gains Afforded by Improved Bid Design versus Follow-Up Valuation Questions in Discrete-Choice CV Studies,” Land Economics. 76(2): 299-311. South African National Parks, 2013. (http://www.sanparks.org/) (2013/1/28). Sutherland, Ronald J., and Richard G. Walsh, 1985. “Effect of Distance on the Preservation Value of Water Quality,” Land Economics. 61(3): 281-291. Swinton, Scott M., 2002. “Capturing Household-level Spatial Influence in Agricultural Management Using Random Effects Regression,” Agricultural Economics. 27: 371-381. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), 2010. “The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: The Ecological and Economic Foundations,” In Report of the tenth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP-10). Nagoya, Japan. October 2010. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, 2013.(http://www.ramsar.org/)(2013/6/30) Tisdell, Clem and Clevo Wilson, 2001. “Wildlife-based Tourism and Increased Support for Nature Conservation Financially and Otherwise: Evidence from Sea Turtle Ecotourism at Mon Repos,” Tourism Economics. 7(3): 233-249. Tobin, James, 1958. “Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables,” Econometrica. 26(1): 24-36. Turner, R. Kerry, Jeroen C. J. M. Van Den Bergh, Tore Soderqvist, Aat Barendregt, Jan Van Der Straaten, Edward Maltby and Ekko C. Van Ierland, 2000. “Ecological-economic Analysis of Wetlands: Scientific Integration for management and Policy,” Ecological Economics. 35(1): 7-23. Verropoulou, Georgia and Cleon Tsimbos, 2013, “Modelling the Effects of Maternal Socio-demographic Characteristics on the Preterm and Term Birth Weight Distribution in Greece using Quantile Regression,” Journal of Biosocial Science. 45(3):375-390. Wu, Pei-Ing, Je-Liang Liou and Ming-Ta Su, 2011. “The Willingness to Pay Differences among Stakeholders: Compensation Benchmark for Conservation of a Biodiversity Site,” The Empirical Economics Letters. 10(9): 908-915. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61718 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 過去文獻隱含距離與願付價值之間呈現唯一的負向關係,也就是距離衰退現象。而本文從保護區之劃設而受犧牲的利害關係人角度觀察,重新檢視距離與願付價值之間的關係。應用受限分量迴歸模型,不同分位數的迴歸估計式以更精確的觀察距離在各分量願付價值下的影響,並以墾丁國家公園、彰化海岸濕地與黑面琵鷺保護區分別為研究地區。其中,墾丁國家公園由於樣本多為使用者所組成故代表使用者樣本,而彰化海岸濕地與黑面琵鷺保護區樣本多由非使用者所組成故代表非使用者樣本。
根據分析結果顯示,使用者與非使用者樣本所代表的不同自然資源財貨之距離確實對願付價值有顯著的影響,距離隨著願付價值的增加而上升。其中,離自然資源保護區越近的當地居民越有可能因為保護區的設立受到法規限制進而被迫改變原本的生活型態或禁止開發活動。反之,離自然資源保護區較遠的一般民眾在無法規限制的情況下,反而會因為保護區自然資源受到良好的維護進而產生非使用價值與存在價值。又從距離彈性值可以發現在不同自然資源財貨下,距離對當地居民的彈性大於一般民眾,亦即距離變動對當地居民願付價值有最大的影響效果。至於墾丁國家公園、彰化海岸濕地與黑面琵鷺保護區的自然資源總價值分別為94億元、82億元與51億元,故使用者在距離影響下的資源總價值高於非使用者。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Most studies in the literature implied relationship between distance and willingness to pay is negative, so-called distance decay phenomenon. The purposes of this paper will view an issue from stakeholder perspective and revisit the relationship between distance and willingness to pay. Therefore, conduct a censored quantile regression model for three suitable sets of data to portray the relationship between distance and willingness to pay. One set of data is mainly concerning the users of natural resources as Kenting National Park. As such this set of data can be a representation of user samples. And the other two sets of data are composed majorly by the nonusers of natural resources, i.e. Black -faced Spoonbill Protected Area and Changhua Coast Wetland. These data can thus be a representation of nonuser samples.
The estimate results show that distance and willingness to pay for either user or nonuser samples does have significant effects. While according to the limitation of natural resources for those who reside close to the resource sites, distance and willingness to pay reveals one dimensional positive relation. The closer to the resource site will lead to lower willingness to pay. Residents who live in the local area are more likely to undergo the biggest potential damage of conserving such a site for not allowing their development. Conversely, the farther away from the natural resources site accompanies with the higher willingness to pay. The general public doesn’t undergo the regulatory restrictions of protected area as such their willingness to pay will tend not to decrease, due to their concern for the nonuse or existence value of the site while the natural resources are well protected. Furthermore, distance elasticity of respondents closer to the site is higher than those farther away from the site. This means, the respondents’ willingness to pay living around the resource site will be more sensitive to the change of distance. As for total values of Kenting National Park, Changhua Coastal Wetland and Black-faced Spoonbill Protected Area are 9.4 billion, 8.2 billion and 5.1 billion respectively. Thus, total values of users are higher than nonusers under the influence of distance. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T13:10:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00627033-1.pdf: 3514557 bytes, checksum: acd6098e67e45d2fe6c96f25b6ab8a4c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 頁次
摘要 ..................................................... i Abstract ............................................... ii 目錄 ................................................... iii 表目錄 .................................................. vi 圖目錄 .................................................. ix 第一章 緒論 ............................................. 1 第一節 研究動機 .......................................... 1 第二節 研究目的 ......................................... 4 第二章 距離與願付價值關係之概念架構 ......................... 5 第一節 生態保護區資源經濟價值之內涵 ......................... 5 第二節 二元選擇與開放式結合之誘導支付方式 .................... 10 第三節 距離與願付價值關係探討 .............................. 13 一、距離與願付價值之關係 ............................... 13 二、距離對使用者與非使用者願付價值的影響 .................. 16 三、資料型態及估計模型之選用 ............................ 17 第四節 分量迴歸模型 ...................................... 17 第三章 實證資料來源與問卷設計 .............................. 20 第一節 彰化海岸濕地自然資源之價值評估 ....................... 20 一、彰化海岸濕地之位置、資源特色與保育價值 ................ 20 二、彰化海岸濕地之問卷設計 ............................. 21 三、彰化海岸濕地之抽樣設計 ............................. 28 第二節 墾丁國家公園資源經濟價值評估與黑面琵鷺保護區多元價值評估 .. 33 一、墾丁國家公園資源經濟價值評估問卷之簡述 ................ 33 二、黑面琵鷺保護區多元價值評估問卷之簡述 .................. 35 第三節 距離變數之計算 .................................... 35 第四章 變數選擇與實證模型設定 ............................. 38 第一節 樣本來源與特性檢視 ................................. 38 一、樣本來源 ......................................... 38 二、樣本特性之檢視 .................................... 40 第二節 變數選擇與處理 .................................... 48 一、彰化海岸濕地變數選擇 ............................... 50 二、墾丁國家公園變數選擇 ............................... 50 三、黑面琵鷺保護區變數選擇 ............................. 52 第三節 實證資料檢視 ...................................... 53 一、彰化海岸濕地樣本特性之檢視 .......................... 53 二、墾丁國家公園樣本特性之檢視 .......................... 59 三、黑面琵鷺保護區樣本特性之檢視 ......................... 63 第四節 距離與願付價值的關係 ............................... 67 第五節 願付價值實證估計模型之設定與估計方法 .................. 69 一、受訪者願付價值在受限分量迴歸模型下之設定 .............. 69 二、受訪者願付價格在Tobit模型下之設定 ................... 73 第五章 實證模型估計結果與分析 ............................. 76 第一節 願付價值之估計結果與分析 ............................ 76 一、彰化海岸溼地係數估計結果 ............................ 76 二、墾丁國家公園係數估計結果 ............................ 81 三、黑面琵鷺保護區係數估計結果 .......................... 83 第二節 願付價格模型係數估計結果之檢定 ....................... 86 一、跨分量迴歸的估計係數檢定結果與分析 .................... 86 二、願付價值模型預測效果準確度之檢定 ..................... 92 第三節 距離與WTP關係之分析 ................................ 96 一、距離在各分量願付價值下之影響 ......................... 97 二、不同分量之願付價值距離彈性之估算 .................... 107 第四節 每戶每年願付價值平均值與總價值之估算與分析 ............ 110 一、平均每戶每年願意支付之資源維護費 .................... 110 二、全國每年願意支付之資源維護費總和 .................... 111 第六章 結論與建議 ...................................... 117 參考文獻 ............................................... 119 附錄一 彰化海岸溼地介紹說明圖 ........................... 128 附錄二 彰化海岸濕地試訪問卷所使用的濕地服務功能說明卡 ........ 130 附錄三 臺灣重要濕地整體分布情況 .......................... 132 附錄四 彰化海岸濕地正式問卷調查表 ......................... 134 附錄五 彰化海岸濕地正式訪問所使用的濕地服務功能說明卡 ......... 144 附錄六 墾丁國家公園正式問卷調查表 ......................... 146 附錄七 黑面琵鷺保護區正式問卷調查表 ........................ 156 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 距離與願付價值關係再檢視--受限分量迴歸模型之應用 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Relationship between Distance and Willingness to Pay Revisited: Application of Censored Quantile Regression Model | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許聖章,闕雅文,劉哲良 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 條件評估法,距離彈性,距離衰退,總價值,七股黑面琵鷺保護區,墾丁國家公園,彰化海岸濕地, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Contingent Valuation Method,Distance Elasticity,Distance Decay,Total Value,Black-faced Spoonbill Protected Area,Kenting National Park,Changhua Coastal Wetland, | en |
dc.relation.page | 166 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-07-31 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.43 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。