請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61540完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳達仁(Da-Zen Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuang-Cheng Fan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 范光城 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T13:05:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-08-27 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-27 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部份
碩博士論文 [1] 吳宗蓉 (2000)。臺灣股價指數與景氣動向關聯性之探討，台北大學經濟學系碩士論文。 [2] 陳順煜 (1990)。企業社會責任與財務績效關係之實證研究，大同工學院事業經營研究所 [3] 陳瑞璋 (2006)。專利集中度對公司資產報酬之關連性研究-以美國電腦通訊設備產業為例，雲林科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。 [4] 鄭國強 (2004)。廠商的專利行為與市場價值關聯-以全球半導體產業為例，世新大學財務金融學系碩士論文。 [5] 潘予青 (2010)。市場導向、關係資本對企業經營績效關係之研究-以個案研究公司為例，淡江大學會計學系碩士論文。 中文書 [6] 陳達仁、黃慕萱 (2009)。專利資訊、檢索、分析與策略，華泰文化事業股份有限公司。 期刊 [7] 阮明淑、梁峻齊 (2009)。專利指標發展研究。圖書館學與資訊科學，35（2），88-106頁。 [8] 林惠玲、李顯峰 (民 85)。台灣專利權數與 R&D 支出關係之研究-非負整數計量模型之應用，經濟論文，24 冊，273-301 頁。 [9] 夏文龍 (1998)。專利對產業界的價值，智慧財產權管理季刊，Vol. 16，20-21頁。 [10] 鄭秀玲、張淑卿 (2005)，專利引證和國際知識外溢：以電子業為例」，經濟論文，33，103-140頁。 [11] 謝宛瑜 (2001)。CHI專利指標—利用專利評估公司價值。專利情報月刊，12期。 [12] 闕河士、菅瑞昌、黃旭輝，研究發展密集度與專利對股票績效影響－以台灣上市公司為例，產業管理學報，1卷0期 (其它)，2000，257~268頁。 ENGLISH PARTS JOURNALS [13] Arora, A., Ceccagnoli, M. and W. M. Cohen. (2003). “R&D and the patent premium”, NBER Working Paper, w9431 [14] Alford, D., Sackett, P., & Nelder, G. (2000). “Mass customization - An automotive perspective”, International journal of production economics, 65, 99-110. [15] Bosworth, D. and M. Rogers. (2001). Market value, “R&D and intellectual property: An empirical analysis of large Australian firms”, The Economic Record 77 (239), 323-337. [16] Bronwyn H. Hall, Adam Jaffe and Manuel Trajtenberg. (2000). “Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look', Economics Working Papers E00-277, University of California at Berkeley. [17] Chang, Chen and Huang (2012). “The relationships between the patent performance and corporation performance”, Journal of informetrics, 6, pp131-139. [18] Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1979). “Distribution of Estimators for Time Series Regressions with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol.74, pp.427-431. [19] Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1981). “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Times-Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrics, Vol.49, pp.1057-1072. [20] Doi, N. (1996). “Performance of Japanese Firms in Patented Innovations; analysis of Patents Granted in the U.S.”, Review of Industrial Organization, Vol.11, pp.49-68. [21] Doukas, J. and Switzer L. (1992). 'The Stock Market’s Valuation of R&D Spending and Market Concentration', Journal of Economics and Business, (44), pp. 95-114. [22] Ernst, H. (2003). “Patent information for strategic technology management”, World Patent Information, 25, 233-242. [23] Ernst, H., (2001). “Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level”, Research Policy, Vol. 30, pp. 143-157. [24] Griliches, Z. (1990),“Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.28, December, pp.1661-1707. [25] Griliches, Z., (1980). “Returns to research and development expenditures in the private sector,' in J.Kendrick and B. Vaccara (eds.), New Developments in Productivity Measurement and Analysis, University of Chicago Press,419-461. [26] Griliches, Z., (1981). “ Market Value, R&D, and Patents', Economics Letters, 7 (2), 183-187. [27] Griliches, Z.; Hall, B. H. and Pakes, A. (1988). “R&D, Patents and Markets Value Revisited: Is There a second (Technological Opportunity) Factor”, NBER Working Paper NO.2624 [28] Griliches, Z. (1981). “Markets Value, R&D and Patents”, Econ. Letters, 7, pp.183-87. [29] Griliches, Z. (1989). “Patents: Recent Trends and Puzzles”, Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. Microeconomics, pp3291-330. [30] Guan, J. C. and Gao, X. (2009). “Exploring the h-index at patent level.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (1), 35–40. [31] Hall, B. H., A. B. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg, (2001). “Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look”, Berkeley, Dept. of Economics Working Paper, University of California [32] Hall, L.A. and S. Bagchi-Sen. (2002).”A Study of R&D Intensity, Innovation and Business Performance in the Canadian Biotechnology Industry”, 22 (2), Technovation, pp.231-244. [33] Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., and M. Trajtenberg (2000). ”Market Value and Patent Citation: A First Look”, NBER Working Paper, No.7741. [34] Harhoff, D., F. Narin, Scherer, F.M., and K. Vopel. (1999). ”Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions”, The Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (3), 511-515. [35] Hirsch, J.E. (2005). “An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 16569–16572 [36] Hou, K. and, Robinson D. T. (2006), 'Industry Concentration and Average Stock Returns', Journal of Finance, (61), pp. 1927-1956. [37] Feng. (2009), “Research on the Application of h-index in the Assessment of Patent”, Journal of Information, Vol.28, No.12, pp. 16-20. [38] Hsiao, Cheng. (1986). Analysis of Panel Data, New York: Cambridge University Press. [39] Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M. (1996). “Flows of knowledge from universities and federal laboratories: Modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries', NBER working paper, No. 5712. [40] Levin, A. , Lin, C. F. ,Chu, C. S.(2002). “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties.” Journal of Econometric,108,1-24. [41] Lieberman, M. B. (1987). “Patents Learning by Doing, and Market Structure in the Chemical Processing Industries.”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol.5, pp.257-276. [42] Lukas, B. A., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). “The effect of market orientation on product innovation”, Journal of the academy of marketing science, 28(2), 239-247. [43] Mariani, D., (2004). “What determinates technologies hits? Geography versus firm competencies,” Research Policy 33, 1565-1582. [44] Montalvo, Jose G. (1997). “GMM Estimating of Count-Panel-Data Models with Fixed Effects and Predetermined Instruments.”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Vol.18, pp.82-89. [45] Narin, F.; Noma, E.; Perry, R., (1987). 'Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength', Research Policy, 16, pp. 143-155. [46] Narin, F.(1994). “Patent bibliometrics.” Scientometrics, 30(1), 147-155. [47] Pakes, A. (1985). “On Patents, R&D and the Stock Market Rate of Return.”, J. Polit. Econ., 93 (2), pp.390-409. [48] Quan, J. (1992), “ Two-Step Testing Procedure for Price Discovery Role of Futures”, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 12, pp.130-145. [49] Scherer, F. M. (1983). “The Propensity to Patent.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1 (1): 107-128. [50] Schoenecker, Timothy S. and Laura J. Swanson. (2002) “Indicators of Firm Technological”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, February 2002, 36-44 [51] Schutzer, A. (1994) “When Big R&D Spending Signals a Winning Stock”, Medical Economics, Vol. 71, pp. 71-78. [52] Stolpe, M., (2002). “Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data : the case of liquid crystal display technology. “, Research Policy, 31, pp.1181-1198. [53] Trajtenberg, M. (1990). “A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations.”, Rand J. Econ, 21 (1). [54] Ziedonis, R. H., and B. H. Hall. (2001). “The Effects of Strengthening Patent Rights on Firms Engaged in Cumulative Innovation：Insights from the Semiconductor Industry”, NBER Working Paper, Vol. Iss:13, pp.133-187 BOOKS [55] Hall, B., Jaffe, A., and Trachtenberg, M. (2002). The NBER Patents Citations Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools. In: Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M. (Eds.), Patents, Citations and Innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. The MIT Press, pp. 403-59. [56] Joseph Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61540 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究使用具時間序列與橫斷面縱橫資料的廻歸分析方法，探討2003~2012年，在美國專利資料庫中，以美國國家經濟研究院NBER歸類之電腦通訊領域的樣本公司，利用其核准專利數資料，統計年HHI專利集中度指標，及電腦通訊領域分類號下核准專利的h指標 (h index)，對分析樣本公司的公司市值報酬進行關聯研究。
研究結果顯示，年HHI專利集中度指標與h指標兩項自變數，分別對樣本公司年股價累積報酬率與年股東報酬率兩應變數無建立明顯關聯。當h指標轉變為具累積分率概念的年累積變化率指標時，與年股價累積報酬率產生明顯正關聯。表示公司專利被引用成長率與公司股價報酬具正向連動關係。使用HHI專利集中度指標與h指標年累積變化率為自變數，樣本公司年股價累積報酬率為應變數，使用縱橫資料的廻歸模型結果，各樣本公司具個別差異，以固定效果模型解釋為佳，且HHI專利集中度指標對股價年累積報酬變化率的影響程度大於h指標年累積變化率。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In this study, an associated research using the regression analysis method of time series and cross section was to gather statistics of HHI index and h index analyzed by granted patents from the value of the empirical firm returning and patent index in 2003 to 2012. The empirical companies were samples from the NBER classified computer and communications industry and then analyzed their firm market value returns.
The results indicated that h index and HHI index were independent variables which had no significant correlation with annual rate of cumulative stock returns and returns on equity. However, when h index switched into the concept of cumulative fraction of the rate indicator, it showed a significant positive correlation. This study framework with panel data models verified that the optimization of the fixed effect model was better than the others. The empirical results indicated that annual rate of cumulative h index had positive influences upon firm annual rate of cumulative stock returns. Furthermore, this study developed a classification for the computer and communications industry companies to divide evenly into four types, and provided some proposal as suggestions. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T13:05:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-P00546011-1.pdf: 4129395 bytes, checksum: 558d9136cf49542745cd0c459f1954d9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 目錄 v LIST OF FIGURES viii LIST OF TABLES ix LIST OF APPENDIX xi Chapter 1 緒論 1 1.1 問題陳述 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 論文架構 3 1.4 研究範圍及限制 5 Chapter 2 文獻回顧 7 2.1 創新活動與公司價值關係 7 2.2 專利質化指標 9 2.3 具市場導向的企業價值與專利指標關係 12 Chapter 3 研究方法與步驟 15 3.1 研究設計與流程 15 3.2 研究指標 17 3.2.1 股價報酬指標 18 3.2.2 專利技術評價指標 20 3.3 樣品選取與處理 23 3.3.1 公司樣本 23 3.3.2 變數 26 3.4 關聯性模型建立與分析 27 3.4.1 關聯性分析 28 3.4.2 Panel Data單根檢定 29 3.4.3 橫斷面時間序模型 33 3.4.4 模型檢定 39 Chapter 4 研究結果分析 43 4.1 樣品處理與來源 43 4.2 關聯性結果 45 4.2.1 不同變數指標 45 4.2.2 不同象限關聯性分析 50 4.3 單根檢定 55 4.4 關聯性模型建立與分析 56 4.4.1 橫斷面時間序廻歸模型分析 56 4.4.2 適用模型檢定 59 Chapter 5 結論與建議 65 5.1 研究結論 65 5.1.1 專利質的指標與公司市值關聯 65 5.1.2 適用模型及技術公司類型 66 5.2 研究建議 67 參考資料 69 Appendix 75 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 公司市值表現與市場導向技術之關聯性研究-以電腦通訊產業為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on the Relationship between Market Performance and Market-Oriented Technology - A Case of the Computers and Communications Industry | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃慕蓉,林正平 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 專利集中度,h指標,公司市值,報酬率,縱橫資料, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | HHI index,h index,firm market value,stock return,panel data, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 124 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-05 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 工業工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 工業工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.03 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。