請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6134
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張祖亮 | |
dc.contributor.author | Hsi-Chin Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳錫欽 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-16T16:21:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-11-05 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-16T16:21:38Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-11-05 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-10-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1.王立敏. 2012. 結合專家意見之台灣技職商學院績效評估‒模糊層級與資料包絡分析法之應用. 臺灣大學健康政策與管理研究所博士論文. 台北.
2.內政部. 2013a. 內政統計年報‒戶政‒人口年齡分配. 台北. 31 May 2013. <http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm>. 3.內政部. 2013b. 內政統計年報‒社會‒老人安養養護機構. 台北. 31 May 2013. <http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/list.htm>. 4.江志利、張興、馮俊濤. 2002. 植物精油研究及其在植物保護中的利用. 陝西農業科學1:32-36. 5.李彥頤. 2004. 辦公空間室內空氣品質管制策略之研究. 成功大學建築研究所博士論文. 台南. 6.李濤、侯月霞、蔡國友、沈子威、席葆樹、陶祖菜. 2001. 流式細胞術分析強聲波對植物細胞周期的影響. 生物物理學報17(1) :195-198. 7.呂錘寬. 1996. 臺灣傳統音樂. 東華. 台北. 8.卓芷聿. 2009. 芳香療法全書. 商周出版. 台北. 9.姜仕仁、黃俊、陳劼. 2010. 音樂聲頻對3種露地作物的應用試驗研究. 浙江科技學院學報22(4) :253-257. 10.段國峰、肖千文、周蘭英. 2005. 生長素結合蛋白質研究進展. 四川林業科技26(2):43-45. 11.祝俊儒、姜仕仁、沈蓮清. 2011. 音樂聲頻對植物生長素的影響. 安徽農業科學39(33) :20303-20305,20309. 12.財團法人資訊工業策進會. 2011. 物聯網與遠距醫療照護導入實務班. 16 Sep. 2011. <http://www.iiiedu.org.tw/ites/HEAL.htm>. 13.陳正立. 2012. 最差績效前緣資料包絡分析法之研究與應用. 交通大學工業工程與管理學系博士論文. 新竹. 14.陳錫欽. 2008. 應用六標準差概念提昇臺灣香草園之服務品質. 臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 台北. 15.曾珮琳. 2005. 國小學生音樂風格偏好之研究‒以彰化市小中高級年級學生為例. 國立台北師範學院音樂研究所碩士論文. 台北. 16.曾慈慧. 2002. 景觀環境與福祉及復癒關係之研究. 臺灣大學園藝學研究所博士論文. 台北. 17.曾瀚霈. 1997. 音樂認知與欣賞. 幼獅文化事業股份有限公司. 台北. 18.黃宜純. 2008. 實用芳療按摩. 知音出版社. 台北. 19.葉德銘. 2010. 淨化室內空氣之植物‒應用及管理手冊. 行政院環境保護署. 台北. 20.趙虎成、王伯初、曹文靈、段傳人、劉怡堯. 2001. 擬南芥信號傳遞途徑. 重慶大學學報(自然科學版)24(1):148-150. 21.鄭心怡. 2007. 台南地區老年人音樂偏好與聆聽音樂之生理反應. 國立臺南大學音樂教育學系碩士論文. 台南. 22.簡上仁. 2001. 福爾摩沙之美:臺灣的傳統音樂. 行政院文化建設委員會. 台北. 23.韓可宗. 2002. 療癒型環境理論評介. 中華心理衛生學刊15(1):47-41. 24.韓可宗. 2006. 環境復癒量表的精簡改良與進一步測試. 華人心理學報7(2) :207-236. 25.魏進民、李標、王伯初、唐坤、梁亦龍、舒坤賢. 2008. 聲波刺激對鐡皮石斛過氧化物酶同工酶基因表達的影響. 應用聲學27(6) :462-467. 26.Von Braunschweig, R. and溫佑君. 2003. 精油圖鑑. 商周出版. 台北. 27.Abbriti, M.C. and G. Muzi 1995. Indoor air quality and health effects in office buildings. Intl. Conf. Healthy Buildings in a Mild Climate. p. 185-195. 28.Anedrsen, P. and N.C. Petersen. 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Mgt. Sci. 39:1261-1264. 29.Atienza, A.A., R. Collins, and C.A. King. 2001. The mediating effects of situational control on social support and mood following a stressor: A prospective study of dementia caregivers in their natural environments. J. Gerontol. 56B:129-140. 30.Banker, R.D., A. charnes, and W.W. Cooper. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Manag. Sci. 30(9) :1078-1092. 31.Berto, R. 2005. Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. J. Environ. Psychol. 25:249-259. 32.Bringslimark, T., T. Hartig, and G.G. Patil. 2007. Psychological benefits of indoor plants in workplaces: Putting experimental results into context. HortScience 42:581-587 . 33.Bringslimark, T., T. Hartig, and G.G. Patil. 2009. The psychological benefits of indoor plants: A critical review of the experimental literature. J. Environ. Psychol. 29:422-433. 34.Brunges, M. and G. Avigne. 2003. Music therapy for reducing surgical anxiety. Aorn. J. 78 :816-818. 35.Caplan, R. D., S. Cobb, J. R. J. Frensh, R. Van Harrison, and S. R. Pinnean. 1975. Job demands and worker health: Main effective and occupational difference. Washington, D. C. Government Printing Office. U. S. A. 36.Chang, C.Y. and P.K. Chen. 2005. Human response to window views and indoor plants in the workplace. HortScience 40(5) :1345-1359. 37.Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2:429–444. 38.Chen, H.C., K.S. Chen, T.L. Chang, and C.H. Hsu. 2010a. An application of six sigma methodology to enhance leisure service quality. Qual. Quant. 44:1151-1164. 39.Chen, H.C., S.Y. Hsu, T.L. Chang, and S.L. Yang. 2010b. Applying DEA and taguchi methods in plant selection and optimal layout to increase commerce management environment quality. Afr. J. Bus. Manage. 4:4079-4085. 40.Chen, H.C., T.C. Chang, Y.T. Lin, H.Y. Cheng, and T.L. Chang. 2013a. Application of DMAIC process to enhance health effects in caring institution. Qual. Quant. 47:2065-2080. 41.Chen, H.C., C.H. Wang, K.S. Chen, and T.L. Chang. 2013b. Analysis and construction of stress relief model for healthy indoor environments. Qual. Quant. QUQU-D-13-00027(unpublished). 42.Chen, K.S., S.C. Chen, and R.K. Li. 2002. Process quality analysis of products. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 19 :623-628. 43.Chen, K.S., C.H. Wang, and H.T. Chen 2006. A MAIC approach to TFT-LCD panel quality improvement. Microelectron. Reliab. 46:1189-1198. 44.Chung, S.H., H.I. Lee, and W.L. Pearn. 2005. Analytical network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 96 :15-36. 45.Cohen, S., T. Kamarck, and R. Mermelstein. 1983. A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 24:385-396. 46.Cooper, W.W., L. M. Seiford, and K. Tone. 2000. Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models. Applications, References and DEA-solver Software. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 47.Davison, G.C. and J.M. Neale. 1990. Abnormal psychology. 5th ed. Wiley, N. Y. 48.Dijkstra, K., M.E. Pieterse, and A. Pruyn. 2008. Stress-reducing effects of indoor plants in the built healthcare environment: The mediating role of perceived attractiveness. Prev. Med. 47 :279-283. 49.Farrell, M. J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. A Sta. 3:253–290. 50.Gauthier, P.A. and C. Dallaire 1993. Music therapy. Can. Nurse. 89:46-48. 51.Gencer, C. and D. Gurpinar. 2007. Analyticnetwork process in supplier selection: A casestudy in an electronic firm. Appl. Math. Model. 31:2475-2486. 52.Geogel, M.L. 2001. Lean six sigma. McGraw-Hill. N.Y. 53.Ghou, M.H. and M.F. Lin. 2006. Exploring the listening experiences during guided imagery and music therapy of outpatients with depression. J. Nurs. Res. 14:93-101. 54.Gregoriou, G. N., K. Sedzro, and J. Zhu. 2005. Hedge fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 164(2) :555-571. 55.Ham, C.H. and Y.H. Lee. 2002. Intelligent integrated plant operation system for six sigma. Annu. Rev. Control. 26:27-43. 56.Hartig, T., A. Book, J. Garvill, T. Olsson, and T. Garling. 1996 Environmental influences on psychological restoration. Scand. J. Psychol. 37:378-393. 57.Hirokawa, E. 2004. Effects of music listening and relaxation instructions or arousal changes and the working memory task in older adults. J. Music Ther. 41:107-127. 58.Honeyman M.K. 1992. Vegetation and stress: A comparison study of varying amounts of vegetation in countryside and urban scenes. In:Relf, D. (ed.) The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-Being and Social Development: A National Symposium, Portland: Timber Press. p. 143-145. 59.Hsia, T.C., S.C. Chen, and K.S. Chen. 2009. Enhancement of service quality in internet marketing through application of the six sigma process. J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 26:11-21. 60.Huang, C.T., K.S. Chen, and T.C. Chang 2010. An application of DMADV methodology for increasing the yield rate of surveillance cameras. Microelectron. Reliab. 50:266-272. 61.Hung, Y.H., M.L. Huang, and K.S. Chen. 2003. Service quality evaluation by service quality performance matrix. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 14:79-89. 62.Johnson, R.A. 1999. Miller and freund’s probability and statistics for engineers. Prentice Hall. 63.Joseph, S. 2000. An analysis of the operational efficiency of major airports in the United States. J. Oper. Manag. 18:335-351. 64.Jung, U. and D.W. Seo. 2010. An papproach for R&D project evaluation based oninterdependencies between research objectivesand evaluation criteria. Decis. Support. Syst. 49:335–342 . 65.Kaplan, R. and S. Kaplan 1989. The experience of nature: a psychological perpective. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. p. 177-201. 66.Kenny D. T. and G. Faunce. 2004. The impact of group singing on mood, coping, and perceived pain in chronic pain patients attending a multidisciplinary pain clinic. J. music ther. 41:241-258. 67.Lambert, D.M. and A. Sharma. 1990. A customer-based competitive analysis for logistics decisions. Int. J. Phys. Distr. Log. Manag. 20:23. 68.Laumann, K., T. Garling, and K.M. Stormark 2001. Rating scale measures of restorative components of environment. J. Environ. Psych. 21:31-44. 69.Linderman, K. R.G. Schroeder. S. Zaheer, and A.S. Choo 2003. Six sigma: A goal-theoretic perspective. J. Oper. Manag. 21:193-203. 70.McKinney, C.H., F.C. Tims, and A.M. Kumar. 1997. The effect of selected classical music and spontaneous imagery on plasma beta-endorphin. J. Behav. Med. 20: 85-99. 71.Molhave, L., B. Bach, and O. F. Pedersen. 1986. Human reactions to low concentrations of volatile organic compounds. Environ. Intl. 12:167-175. 72.Nayar, P., Y.A. Ozcan, F. Yu, and A.T. Nguyen. 2012. Bench marking urban acute care hospitals: Efficiency and quality perspectives. Health Care Manage Rev. Mar. 29. 73.Parasuraman, A., V.A. Zeithaml, and L.L. Berry. 1985. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Mark. 49:41-50. 74.Parasuraman, A., V.A. Zeithaml, and L.L. Berry. 1988. Servqual: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J. Retailing. 64:12-37. 75.Parasuraman, A., V.A. Zeithaml, and L.L. Berry. 1991. Understanding customer expectation of service. Sloan Manag. Rev. 32:39-48. 76.Parente, F. and J. Anderson-Parente. 1987. Delphi inquiry systems. In wright, G. and P. Ayton. (Eds.). Judgmental Forecasting. PP.129-156, N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons. 77.Purcell, T., E. Peron, and R. Berto. 2001. Why do preferences differ between scene types?. Environ. Behav. 33:93-106. 78.Ross, P. J. 1988. Taguchi techniques for quality engineering. McGraw-Hill. N.Y. 79.Saaty, T.L. 1971. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 40: 9-10. 80.Saaty, T.L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill. N.Y. 81.Saaty, T.L. 1990. How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48(1): 9-26. 82.Saaty, T.L. 1996. Decision makings with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. RWS Publications. Pittsburgh. 83.Saaty, T.L. and L.G. Vargas. 2000. Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Boston. 84.Seiford, L. and J. Zhu. 1999. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U. S. commercial banks. Mgt. Sci. 45:1270-1288. 85.Speilberg, C. D. 1999. Measuring anxiety and anger with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory(STAI) and the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory(STAXI). In Marnish, M. E. (Eds), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment. 93-1021. 86.Taguchi, G. 1987. System of experimental design: Engineering methods to optimize quality and minimize cost. UNIPUB. White Plains. N.Y. 87.Taguchi, G. and D. Clausing. 1990. Robust quality. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68:65-75. 88.Taguchi, G. 1991. Introduction to quality engineering. Asian Productivity Organization. UNIPUB. White Plains. N.Y. 89.Talbott, J.A., D. Stern, J. Ross, and C. Gillen. 1976. Flowering plants as a therapeutic/environmental agent in a psychiatric hospital. HortScience 11:365-366. 90.Taslicali, A.K. and S. Ercan. 2006. Theanalytic hierarchy and the analytic networkprocess in multicriteria decision making: acomparative study. J. Aeronaut. Technol. 2:55-65. 91.Tseng, M.L. 2011. Importance–performance analysis of municipal solid waste management in uncertainty. Environ. Monit. Assess. 172:171-187. 92.Thrall, R.M. 1996. Duality, classification and slacks in DEA. Ann. Oper. Res. 66:109-138. 93.Ulrich R.S. 1983. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman and J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.). Human Behavior and Environments: Advances in theory and research(6). N.Y: Plenum Press. p. 85-125. 94.Ulrich, R.S. 1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Sci. 224:420-421. 95.U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1991. Indoor Air Facts No. 4 (revised) sick building syndrome. Research and Development. 10 Mar. 2013. <http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pdfs/sick_building_factsheet.pdf>. 96.Van de Braak, S.A.A.J. and G.C.J.J. Leijten. 1999. Essential oils and oleoresins: A survey in the Netherlands and other major markets in the European union. CBI, Centre for the Promotion of Imports from Developing Countries. Rotterdam. 97.Voulgaridou, D., K. Kirytopoulos, and V. Leopoulos. 2009. An analytic networkprocess approach for sales forecasting. Oper. Res. Int. J. 9:35-53. 98.Wang, B.C., X. Chen, and Z. Wang. 2003. Biological effect of sound field stimulation on paddy rice seeds. Colloid. Surface. B. 32(1):29-34. 99.Watkins, G.R. 1997. Music therapy: Proposed physiological mechanisms and clinical implications. Clin. Nurse Spec. 11:43-50 . 100.WHO. 1948. Constitution of the world health organization: 1. 10 Mar. 2013. <http://www.searo.who.int/LinkFiles/About_SEARO_const.pdf>. 101.Wolverton, B.C. 1997. How to grow fresh air - 50 houseplants that purify your home or office. Penguin Book. N.Y. 102.Williams, D.A. and I. Powers. 1991. Anxiety. Advancing Clinical care:5-8. 103.Zuckerman, M. 1977. The development of a situation-specific trait-state test for the prediction and measurement of affective responses. J. Consul. Clin. Psychol. 45(4):513-523. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6134 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著生活型態的轉變,每人每天平均約有80%或更多的時間處於室內環境之中。室內環境產生的空氣污染,可能會引起不同層面的危害問題。例如,降低生產力、損失工時及增加成本,更直接的影響就是工作品質、效率和身體的健康。許多研究指出,植栽可以濾淨空氣、紓解壓力和提高工作效率,精油能讓人心情愉悅與移除負面的想法,而音樂具有令人心靈寧靜、放鬆肌肉和紓壓的效果,顯然植栽、精油和音樂三者都與健康紓壓具有正相關的關係。因此,本研究為了改善室內空氣品質,創造清新、紓壓的環境,並建立評估模式,首先,在第一章中,回顧了室內環境品質良窳的重要性,並指出植栽、精油和音樂三者交互作用,可以改善室內健康環境品質,降低「病態建築症候群」。第二章中,回顧了DEA、6σ之DMAIC流程、ANP及TM等4種主要的研究方法,並說明將該方法分別應用於本研究。第三章,以學校的教室為例,應用DEA與TM選取植栽和最佳配置,以提升室內健康環境之品質。第四章,以安養照護機構的閱覽室為例,導入6σ之DMAIC流程,選取植栽、精油及音樂的最佳組合,以提升室內環境之健康紓壓的品質。第五章,以幼稚園的會議室為例,採用ANP篩選植栽、精油及音樂,透過TM,評估室內健康環境品質,並以統計檢定驗證試驗結果。最後,在第六章中,說明本研究證實,植栽、精油及音樂的最佳組合,確實可以有效淨化室內空氣、紓緩壓力和提升環境品質,且其效果非常的顯著,並強調一套室內健康環境的評估模式,已應然而生。同時相信,透過本研究所提供的評估模式,可以有效改善室內的空氣品質,創造一個舒適、清新與健康的環境,亦可提供醫療照護、養老院及辦公場所等機構,作為改善環境的參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Currently, most people spend 80% to 90% of their time working in an airtight indoor environment. Indoor air pollution may cause different levels of hazard problem, e.g., would cause uncomfortable symptoms or relevant diseases, and therefore result in productivity reducing, time losing and cost increasing, which can degrade work quality, work efficiency, and long-term health. Many researchers have demonstrated that plants can be used to purify the air and relive stress, essential oils can promote positive emotions and eliminate negative thoughts, and music can relieve stress by calming nerves and relaxing muscles. All of these are positively related to the release of stress and the promotion of health. To improve IAQ, create a refreshing, stress-relieving environment and build an assessment model, this study first reviewed the importance of IAQ, highlighting the function of plants, essential oils and music in improving IAQ and reducing SBS. The second chapter reviews four key research methods, being DEA, DMAIC of 6σ, ANP and TM, and explains how each of these methods are respectively applied to this research. In the third chapter, using a school classroom as an example, we employed DEA and TM to select plants and determine their optimum configuration, in order to enhance the quality of the indoor environment. In the fourth chapter, using the reading room of an aged care facility as an example, we applied the DMAIC procedure of 6σto select the optimum combination of plants, essential oils and music, in order to maximize the health-promoting and stress-relieving features of the indoor environment. In the fifth chapter, using the conference room of a kindergarten as an example, we employed ANP to select plants, essential oils and music, and used TM to evaluate the health-related quality of the indoor environment. This study also used statistical testing to verify the experimental results. Lastly, the sixth chapter discusses how our findings demonstrate that the optimal combination of plants, essential oils and music can effectively purify indoor air, relieve stress and enhance environmental quality. We also emphasize the importance of developing a model to evaluate the quality of an indoor environment in promoting health and relieving stress. We believe that the proposed system provides an effective means to enhance air quality in the promotion of a comfortable, clean, and healthy environment. Our findings provide a valuable reference for the implementation of environment improvements in medical facilities, retirement homes, and office spaces. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:21:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-D97628003-1.pdf: 3581989 bytes, checksum: 4c17bf91b946e0432f349ec3ab78e11e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書...........................................i
中文摘要..................................................ii 英文摘要.................................................iii 第一章 緒論...............................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機.....................................1 第二節 研究目的...........................................3 第三節 研究架構...........................................4 第四節 名詞解釋...........................................6 第二章 研究方法...........................................9 第一節 資料包絡分析法.....................................9 第二節 六標準差..........................................12 第三節 網路層級分析法....................................15 第四節 田口方法..........................................18 第五節 小結..............................................25 第三章 應用資料包絡分析法與田口方法提升室內健康環境品質..27 第一節 前言..............................................27 第二節 應用資料包絡分析法投入導向模式分析選取優良植栽....28 第三節 實證分析..........................................33 第四節 田口方法..........................................36 第五節 小結..............................................40 第四章 導入六標準差概念提升室內健康環境品質..............41 第一節 前言..............................................41 第二節 定義..............................................43 第三節 衡量..............................................48 第四節 分析..............................................52 第五節 改善與控制........................................56 第六節 小結..............................................62 第五章 採用網路層級分析法和田口方法評估室內健康環境品質..63 第一節 前言..............................................63 第二節 網路層級分析法篩選室內健康環境影響因子............64 第三節 田口方法..........................................74 第四節 試驗驗證..........................................79 第五節 小結..............................................81 第六章 結論與建議........................................83 參考文獻..................................................87 附錄......................................................95 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 室內健康環境評估模式之分析與建立 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Analysis and Construction of Indoor Healthy
Environments Assessment Model | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 徐世輝,張育森,謝俊宏,張俊彥,黃美玲 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 健康環境,植栽,精油,音樂,資料包絡分析法,網路層級分析法,六標準差,田口方法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | healthy environments,plants,essential oils,music,DEA,ANP,6σ,TM, | en |
dc.relation.page | 141 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-10-09 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf | 3.5 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。