請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6128完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭佳昆(Chia-Kuen Cheng) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shu-Farn Chou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 周紓帆 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-16T16:21:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-07-31 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-16T16:21:32Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-07-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-07-29 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文參考文獻
1. 吳佩竹，(2011)，性格特質對地方連結之影響，碩士論文，國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所，臺北。 2. 李敦仁，(2011)，父母參與對青少年學習成長軌跡的影響之貫時追蹤研究：以TEPS資料分析為例，博士論文，國立政治大學教育研究所，臺北。 3. 林文浹、黃俊豪、陳昱良，(2005)，土溝聚落藝術改造行動—以竹仔腳為例，藝術與公共領域 藝術進入社區，台北市：文建會。 4. 林鈺蓉，(2009)，台中市居民鄰里公園場所依戀與遊憩涉入空間群聚效果對公園景觀改變之影響，碩士論文，逢甲大學景觀與遊憩研究所，台中。 5. 曹勝雄、孫君儀，(2009)，建構地方依戀因果關係模式，地理學報，55，43-63。 6. 梁英文、曹勝雄，(2007)，認真性休閒與場所依戀之關係：遊憩專門化扮演的角色，戶外遊憩研究，20(3)，1-24。 7. 郭蕙瑜，(2012)，景觀元素對延續地方連結之影響，碩士論文，國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學研究所，臺北。 8. 陳東宏，(2006)，應用公共藝術共同參與及學校認同之研究—以台東縣豐里國小畢業班為例，碩士論文，國立台東大學教育研究所，台東。 9. 陳盈秀，(2011)，民眾參與景觀設計對其地方依戀之影響，碩士論文，國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所，臺北。 10. 曾旭正，(2005)，重思台灣的社區參與—社區建築中「參與」的概念與作法，藝術與公共領域 藝術進入社區，台北市：文建會。 11. 黃毓華，(2010)，工作特性、工作倦怠與身心健康之關係－固定樣本追蹤研究，博士論文，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所，高雄。 12. 劉俊志，(2004)，居民與遊客對於鯉魚潭風景特定區之地方依戀差異探討，碩士論文，東華大學自然資源管理研究所，花蓮。 13. 劉憲錫，(2008)，釣客遊憩專業化與地方依戀感之研究，碩士論文，國立東華大學觀光暨遊憩管理研究所，花蓮。 14. 歐陽慧真，(2002)，賞鳥者專門化程度與場所依戀關係之研究－以七股濕地為例，碩士論文，東海大學景觀學研究所，台中。 二、英文參考文獻 1. Agyeman, J., Devine-Wright, P., & Prange, J. (2009). Close to the edge, down by the river? Joining up managed retreat and place attachment in a climate changed world. Environment and Planning A, 41(3), 509-513. 2. Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41(1), 49-67. 3. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 4. Altman, I., & Low, S. M. (1992). Place attachment: Plenum Press. 5. Archer, J., Ireland, J., Amos, S., Broad, H., & Currid, L. (1998). Derivation of a homesickness scale. British Journal of Psychology, 89(2), 205-221. 6. Beckley, T. M. (2003). The relative importance of sociocultural and ecological factors in attachment to place. Understanding community-forest relations. L. E. Kruger. Washington DC, United State Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 105- 126. 7. Boğac, C. (2009). Place attachment in a foreign settlement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 267-278. 8. Bonaiuto, M., Breakwell, G. M., & Cano, I. (1996). Identity processes and environmental threat: the effects of nationalism and local identity upon perception of beach pollution. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 6(3), 157-175. 9. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation, anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books. 10. Brandenburg, A. M., & Carroll, M. S. (1995). Your place or mine?: The effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Society & Natural Resources, 8(5), 381-398. 11. Brook, I. (2003). Making here like there: Place attachment, displacement and the urge to garden. Ethics, Place and Environment, 6(3), 227 – 234. 12. Brown, B., Perkins, D. D. (1992). Disruptionsto place attachment. In I. Altman and S. Low(Eds.) Place Attachment(pp. 279-304). New York: Plenum. 13. Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns : The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3-31. 14. Cassidy, J. (1999). The nature of the child's ties. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications (pp. 3-20). New York: Guilford. 15. Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical applications. New York: Guilford Press. 16. Chow, K., & Healey, M. (2008). Place attachment and place identity: First-year undergraduates making the transition from home to university. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 362-372. 17. Devine-Wright, P. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(6), 426-441. 18. Devine-Wright, P., & Howes, Y. (2010). Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 271-280. 19. Dillman, D. A. (2006). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method ( 2007 Update with New Internet, Visual, and Mixed-Mode Guide).New York: John Wiley. 20. Duncan, G. J., & Kalton, G. (1987). Issues of design and analysis of surveys across time. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique, 55(1), 97-117. 21. Elliot, A. J., & Reis, H. T. (2003). Attachment and exploration in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 317-331. 22. Chamlee-Wright, E. & Storr, V. H. (2009). 'There’s no place like new orleans ': Sense of place and community recovery in the ninth ward after hurricane Katrina. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(5), 615-634. 23. Farnum, J., Hall, T., Kruger, L. E. (2005). Sense of place in natural resource recreation and tourism: an evaluation and assessment of research findings. Portland, OR: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 24. Feldman, R. M. (1990). Settlement-identity: psychological bonds with home places in a mobile society. Environment and Behavior, 22(2), 183-229. 25. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 26. Fisher, S. (1989). Homesickness, Cognition And Health. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum. 27. Fisher, S., Frazer, N., & Murray, K.. (1986). Homesickness and health in boarding school children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(1), 35-47. 28. Fisher, S., & Hood, B. (1987). The stress of the transition to university: A longitudinal study of psychological disturbance, absent-mindedness and vulnerability to homesickness. British Journal of Psychology, 78(4), 425-441. 29. Fried, M. (1966). Grieving for a Lost Home. In J.Wilson (Ed.), Urban renewal: The record and the controversy (pp. 359–379).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 30. Fried, M. (2000). Continuities and discontinutties of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(3), 193-205. 31. Fullilove, M. T. (1996). Psychiatric Implications of Displacement: Contributions from the Psychology of Place. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153(12), 1516-1523. 32. Giuliani, M. V. (1991). Towards an analysis of mental representations of attachment to the home. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 8(2), 133-146. 33. Giuliani, M. V. (2003). Theory of attachment and place attachment. In M. Bonnes, T. Lee & M. Bonaiuto (Eds.), Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues (pp. 137-170). Burlington, VT: Ashgate. 34. Giuliani, M. V., & Feldman, R. (1993). Place attachment in a developmental and cultural context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(3), 267-274. 35. Green, R. J. (2010). Coastal Towns in Transition: Local Perceptions of Landscape Change. New York: Springer. 36. Gregory, W. L., Burroughs, W. J., & Ainslie, F. M. (1985). Self-relevant scenarios as an indirect means of attitude change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(4), 435-444. 37. Hammitt, W. E., Backlund, E. A., & Bixler, R. D. (2006). Place Bonding for Recreation Places: Conceptual and Empirical Development. Leisure Studies, 25(1), 17-41. 38. Hammitt, W. E., Kyle, G. T., & Oh, C. O. (2009). Comparison of place bonding models in recreation resource management. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(1), 57-72. 39. Hammitt, W. E., & Stewart, W. P. (1996). Sense of place:A call for construct clarity and management. Paper presented at the Sixth International Symposium on Society & Resource Management, State College, PA. 40. Harris, P. B., Brown, B. B., & Werner, C. M. (1996). Privacy regulation and place attachment: Predicting attachments to a student family housing facility. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(4), 287-301. 41. Hay, R. (1998). Sense of place in developmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(1), 5-29. 42. Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 273-281. 43. Hiruy, K. (2009). Finding home far away from home: place attachment, place-identity, belonging and resettlement among African-Australians in Hobart. Master of Environmental Management thesis, School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania. 44. Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 233-248. 45. Kaltenborn, B. P. (1998). Effects of sense of place on responses to environmental impacts: A study among residents in Svalbard in the Norwegian high Arctic. Applied Geography, 18(2), 169-189. 46. Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39(3), 328-339. 47. Kerstetter, D., & Bricker, K. (2009). Exploring Fijian's sense of place after exposure to tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(6), 691 - 708. 48. Korpela, K. M. (1989). Place-identity as a product of environmental self-regulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9(3), 241-256. 49. Korpela, K. M., Ylen, M., Tyrvainen, L., & Silvennoinen, H. (2009). Stability of self-reported favourite places and place attachment over a 10-month period. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 95-100. 50. Kyle, G. T., & Chick, G. (2007). The Social Construction of a Sense of Place. Leisure Sciences, 29(3), 209-225. 51. Kyle, G. T., Graefe, A. R., & Manning, R. E. (2005). Testing the Dimensionality of Place Attachment in Recreational Settings. Environment and Behavior, 37(2), 153-177. 52. Kyle, G. T., Graefe, A. R., Manning, R. E., & Bacon, J. (2003). An examination of the relationship between leisure activity involvement and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian Trail. Journal of Leisure Research, 35(3), 249–273. 53. Kyle, G. T., Graefe, A. R., Manning, R. E., & Bacon, J. (2004). Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 213-225. 54. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207-230. 55. Low, S. M. (1992). Symbolic ties that bind: place attachment in the Plaza. In I. Low & Setha (Eds.) , Place attachment (pp. 165-185). New York: Plenum Press. 56. Manzo, L. C. (2003). Beyond house and haven: toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 47-61. 57. Manzo, L. C. (2005). For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 67-86. 58. Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. D. (2006). Finding common ground: the importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(4), 335-350. 59. Mazumdar, S., & Mazumdar, S. (1993). Sacred space and place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(3), 231-242. 60. McAndrew, F. T. (1998). The measurement of `Rootedness' and the prediction of attachment to home-towns in college students. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(4), 409-417. 61. Mesch, G. S., & Manor, O. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception, and local attachment. Environment and Behavior, 30(4), 504-519. 62. Michelson, W. M. (1976). Man and his urban environment: a sociological approach, with revisions. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 63. Milligan, M. J. (1998). Interactional past and potential: the social construction of place attachment. Symbolic Interaction, 21(1), 1-33. 64. Milligan, M. J. (2003). Displacement and identity discontinuity: the role of nostalgia in establishing new identity categories. Symbolic Interaction, 26(3), 381-403. 65. Moore, J. (2000). Placing home in context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(3), 207-217. 66. Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. (1994). Attachments to recreation settings: the case of rail‐trail users. Leisure Sciences, 16(1), 17-31. 67. Morgan, P. (2010). Towards a developmental theory of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 11-22. 68. Morrice, S. (2013). Heartache and Hurricane Katrina: Recognising the influence of emotion in post-disaster return decisions. Area, 45(1), 33-39. 69. Ng, C. F. (1998). Canada as a new place: The immigrant’s experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(1), 55-67. 70. Norris-Baker, C., & Scheidt, R. J. (1990). Place attachment among older residents of a 'ghost town' : A transactional approach. In R. I. Selby, K. H. Anthony. J. Choi, & B. Orland (Eds.), Coming of age (pp. 333-342). Oklahoma City, Oklahoma: Environmental Design Research Association. 71. Paivio, A. (1978). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 72. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford. England: Oxford University Press. 73. Pezdek, K., Finger, K., & Hodge, D. (1997). Planting false childhood memories: the role of event plausibility. Psychological Science, 8(6), 437-441. 74. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57-83. 75. Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 10(2), 147-169. 76. Relph, E. C. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion. 77. Riger, S., & Lavrakas, P. J. (1981). Community ties: Patterns of attachment and social interaction in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(1), 55-66. 78. Riley, R. B. (1992). Attachment to the Ordinary Landscape. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place Attachment (Vol. 12, pp. 13-35). New York: Plenum. 79. Ringel, N. B., & Finkelstein, J. C. (1991). Differentiating neighborhood satisfaction and neighborhood attachment among urban residents. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(2), 177-193. 80. Rishbeth, C., & Powell, M. (2012). Place Attachment and Memory: Landscapes of Belonging as Experienced Post-migration. Landscape Research, 38(2), 1-19. 81. Roberts, E. (1996). Place and spirit in public land management. In B. Driver, D. Dustin, T. Baltic, G. Elsner and G. Peterson (Eds.), Nature and the Human Spirit: Toward an Expanded Land Management Ethic (pp. 61-80 ). State College, PA: Venture Publishing. 82. Rowe, J. S. (2002). Home place: essays on ecology. Edmonton: NeWest Press. 83. Ryan, R. L. (2005). Exploring the effects of environmental experience on attachment to urban natural areas. Environment and Behavior, 37(1), 3-42. 84. Scannell, L, & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1-10. 85. Scopelliti, M., & Tiberio, L. (2010). Homesickness in university students: the role of multiple place attachment. Environment and Behavior, 42(3), 335-350. 86. Schroeder, H. W. (2000). What makes a place special? Interpretation of written survey responses in natural resource planning. In D. Bengston (Ed.), Applications of computer-aided text analysis in natural resources (pp. 7-11). USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-211. 87. Shumaker, S. A., & Taylor, R. B. (1983). Toward a clarification of people-place relationships: A model of attachment to place. Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives, 219-251. 88. Smith, J. W., Siderelis, C., & Moore, R. L. (2010). The effects of place attachment, hypothetical site modifications and use levels on recreation behavior. Journal of Leisure Research, 42(4), 621-640. 89. Soini, K., Vaarala, H., & Pouta, E. (2012). Residents’ sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural–urban interface. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(1), 124-134. 90. Stedman, R. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), 561-581. 91. Stedman, R. C. (2003). Sense of place and forest science: toward a program of quantitative research. Forest Science, 49(6), 822-829. 92. Stedman, R. C. (2006). Understanding place attachment among second home owners. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(2), 187-205. 93. Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places: a transactional view of settings. Journal of Cognition, Social Behavior, And The Environment, 5(22), 441-480. 94. Thomas, A. K., Hannula, D. E., & Loftus, E. F. (2007). How self-relevant imagination affects memory for behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 69-86. 95. Tuan, Y. F. (1974). Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 96. Tuan, Y. F. (1980). Rootedness versus sense of place.Landscape, 24(1),3-8. 97. Tuan, Y. F. (2001). Space and place: the perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 98. Tumarkin, M. (2005). Traumascapes: The Power and Fate of Places Transformed by Tragedies. Carlton: Melbourne University Press. 99. Twigger-Ross, C. L., & Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Place and identity processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 205-220. 100. Vandemark, L. M. (2007). Promoting the sense of self, place, and belonging in displaced persons: the example of homelessness. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 21(5), 241-248. 101. Venables, D., Pidgeon, N. F., Parkhill, K. A., Henwood, K. L., & Simmons, P. (2012). Living with nuclear power: Sense of place, proximity, and risk perceptions in local host communities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 371-383. 102. Watt, S. E., & Badger, A. J. (2009). Effects of social belonging on homesickness: an application of the belongingness hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(4), 516-530. 103. Williams, D. R. , & Vaske, J. J. . (2003). The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49(6), 830-840. 104. Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(1), 29-46. 105. Williams, D. R., & Stewart, S. I. (1998). Sense of place: an elusive concept that is finding a home in ecosystem management. Journal of Forestry, 96(5), 18-23. 106. Wynveen, C. J., Kyle, G. T., & Sutton, S. G. (2012). Natural area visitors' place meaning and place attachment ascribed to a marine setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 287-296. 107. Zentella, Y. (2009). Developing a multi-dimensional model of hispano attachment to and loss of land. Culture and Psychology, 15(2), 181-200. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6128 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 地方連結是指人與地之間的特殊情感連結。許多相關研究探討關於家園、社區或國家以及休閒場所等各種不同場所的地方連結，並延伸出多種相似的概念。Beckley(2003)在討論人與地方之關係時，曾指出許多社會學家多專注在地點變化發展時會如何影響社會經濟因素，卻很少討論地點改變時造成的人與地點之連結的變化。本研究回顧過去心理學中孩童對母親的依戀理論，和各種關於被迫搬遷、失去家園、地點中斷(Disruption)、鄉愁(Homesickness)的研究文獻，認為地方的消失或改變可能引發人對地方之連結情感和行為的改變。本研究之討論將限定於休閒場所，討論休閒場所的更新改建等地點變化對於使用者的情感、行為上的可能影響。
本研究的實驗分成三個部分，第一部分以2010年的台北花卉博覽會中的公園為研究地點，針對公園附近居民進行不記名問卷的發放，調查時間分為四個時期調查，以確認施工前期、籌建期、試營運期以及正式營運期的居民連結是否有差異。第二部分則以九個進行更新改建的鄰里公園為研究地點，調查現地使用者在改建前、施工中、改建完畢後的地方連結變化情況，以及受測者返回使用狀況、對改建後之評價與地方連結之間的關係。第三部分則以情境模擬方法讓使用者想像臺大醉月湖改建的狀況，同樣使受測者評估改建前後的地方連結程度，以及受測者對改建後之評價與地方連結之間的關係。更進一步將情境模擬方法與實際案例所得之結果進行比較，討論情境模擬方法用於測試地方連結是否可行。 第一部分的實驗結果顯示地方連結在各時期會有不同的變化，並且留在公園使用的受測者，其對公園的連結較沒有繼續使用的受測者高。此部分可推測出地方連結很可能會因為地點的改變而有變動，進一步於第二、第三部分的實驗中進行探討。第二部分的實驗結果顯示在改建前、施工中、改建完畢的各階段下，地方連結會有所變化，並且連結強者會在公園改變後下降，而連結低者則會上升。對改建的評價則會支撐地方連結。第三部分的情境模擬之結果與第二部分相似，因此本研究認為在人力、成本不足以及需求研究時機特殊的狀況下，或許可利用此種研究方法來探討地方連結的變化狀況。 近年來，由於遊憩需求提升，休閒場所常常要面臨更新改造等問題，此種變化對其使用者或客源帶來的衝擊常常是遊憩區在管理上特別注重的部分，而本研究的內容可供遊憩管理者在管理和規劃上做為參考，並期望此結果可補充現有休閒遊憩地方理論的不足之處。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | People-place relationship has been one of the important issues in recent decades. After reviewing 400 papers that relates to this topic, Lewicka (2011) argued the mechanisms of the place bonding are still undetermined. Therefore, it is meaningful to understand how place bondings are developed and disappeared. The process of place bonding has been mentioned in many discussions of displacement or disruption by researchers. Some of the researchers agree that bonding to a place might always be taken for granting, and this can only be noticed after the place becomes unavailable. However, the effect of place disruption on bonding is rarely discussed in recreational studies. The purpose of the study is to understand how a place bonding toward a park changes after the park become unavailable.
The influence of place changes on place bonding was investigated in three experiments. The first experiment used unlinked anonymous samples to find out how place bonding changes during the event, Taipei International Flora Exposition is on. In the second experiment, an on-site survey was conducted, and all of the respondents were followed with a mail survey after the park closed and reopened with the same bonding measurements. In the third experiment, a comparison of place bonding to the place wsas collected before and after simulating of scenario of place reconstruction. In first experiment, the results showed that place bonding had been declined significantly after the park has closed, but it rose again when the park was reopened for the exposition. This implies that the accessibility of the park is very important for maintaining the place bonding. In the second experiment, we found that the people who have stronger bonding toward the park, their bonding would decline significantly after the status of the park changed, but those who have weaker bonding would rise after the change. Besides this, we found people who are satisfied with the park after the reconstructions, the declined of their place bonding would be smaller after the park is changed. Finally in the third experiment, it shows that place bonding would change after scenario simulation, and the result is similar to the second experiment. This means that the scenario test may be used to investigate the place bonding when there is a time constraint or insufficient human resources. The results of the current study provide a new way to understand the mechanisms of place disruption. , and it will contribute to the planning and management of recreational places. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:21:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00628305-1.pdf: 3212751 bytes, checksum: 5c98cd52e8801e60f21ac30c9d232f1f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
國立臺灣大學（碩）博士學位論文口試委員會審定書 i 誌謝 iii 中文摘要 v 英文摘要 vii 目錄 ix 表目錄 xi 圖目錄 xiv 第一章、緒論 1 第一節、研究背景 1 第二節、研究問題 4 第二章、文獻回顧與概念架構 6 第一節、地方連結(Place Bonding) 6 第二節、地方連結五面向 9 第三節、依戀理論(Attachment Theory) 14 第四節、地點改變與地方連結 16 第五節、研究架構 25 第三章、台北花卉博覽會之地方連結變化 27 第一節、研究方法 27 第二節、實驗結果 30 第三節、結論 37 第四章、鄰里公園改建之地方連結變化 41 第一節、研究方法 41 第二節、實驗結果 44 第三節、結論 67 第五章、臺大醉月湖改建之地方連結變化 73 第一節、研究方法 73 第二節、實驗結果 76 第三節、結論 86 第六章、討論與建議 88 第一節、結果討論 88 第二節、實驗方法與限制 95 第三節、未來應用與建議 97 參考文獻 100 附錄一 110 附錄二 112 附錄三 114 附錄四 117 附錄五 120 附錄六 123 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 地方改變對地方連結變化之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Influence of Place Changes on Place Bonding | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林晏州(Yann-Jou Jin),歐聖榮(Sheng-Jung Ou),張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang),黃章展(Chang-chan Huang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 中斷,地方連結,地方依戀,情境模擬,固定樣本追蹤, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Place Bonding,Place attachment,Disruption,Scenario,Panel, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 125 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-07-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf | 3.14 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。