請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61077完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 郭瑞祥(Ruey-Shan Guo) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wen-Hsien Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李文賢 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T10:45:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-08-17 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-17 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
王世仁、王世堯(2003)。智慧財產權剖析-論生物科技專利策略與實務。台北:全華科技圖書股份有限公司。 王俊雄(2012)。後iPhone時代智慧型手機產業環境因素對宏達電競爭策略影響之研究。政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文,未出版,台北。 企業專利戰略實務指南編寫組(2011)。企業專利戰略實務指南。北京:知識產權出版社。 林慧宜(2009)。論企業之專利管理及運用。清華大學科技法律研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。 金禾山(2009)。專利佈局模式與申請策略-以任天堂Wii為例。台灣科技大學管理學院MBA碩士論文,未出版,台北。 徐曉華(2012)。由專利合作條約與美國延續案之優先權規定探究我國專利布局之策略。東吳大學法律學系碩士在職專班科技法律組碩士論文,未出版,台北。 高鼎懿(2008)。美國專利延續案與布局策略之分析。交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班科技法律組,未出版,新竹。 陳志遠(2012)。利用專利分析研究北美地區智慧型手機企業間各種智慧財產權關係。台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。 陳策允(2012)。商業生態體系價值分配之探討:iPhone全球供應鏈之利潤池分析。台灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。 曾維茂(2005)。高科技產業專利策略之探討。台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。 湯明哲(2011)。策略精論:基礎篇。台北:旗標出版股份有限公司。 馮震宇(2004)。智慧財產權發展趨勢與重要問題研究。台北:元照出版社。 楊雅嵐(2012)。從蘋果電腦專利解析智慧行動終端產品發展趨勢。台北:經濟部技術處。 楊鐵軍(2012)。產業專利分析報告(第5冊)。北京:知識產權出版社。 楊鐵軍(2013)。企業專利工作實務手冊。北京:知識產權出版社。 劉尚志、陳佳麟(2001)。電子商務與電腦軟體之專利保護:發展、分析、創新與策略。台北:翰蘆圖書出版股份有限公司。 二、英文部分 Chetan Sharma Consulting(2013). Mobile Patents Landscape. Retrieved April 30, 2013, from http://www.chetansharma.com/Mobile_Patents_Landscape_2013_Chetan_Sharma_Consulting.pdf Cronin, Brian(1996). Planning an International Patent Filing Strategy: Cost, Cash-flow and Capacity to Succeed. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://www.cronin-ip.com/pdf/PatentStrategy&Costs.pdf Cyber Creative Institute(2012). Evaluation of LTE essential patents declared to ETSI. Retrieved April 30, 2013, from http://cybersoken.com/research/pdf/lte01EN.pdf Gartner(2013), Gartner Says Asia/Pacific Led Worldwide Mobile Phone Sales to Growth in First Quarter of 2013, Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2482816 Graham, Stuart J. H. & Sichelman, Ted M.( 2008). “Why Do Start-Ups Patent?”. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 23. Heller, Michael A.(1998). “The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets”. Harward Law Review, Vol. 111. i-Runway(2011). Increase the ROI of Your Patent Portfolio. Retrieved April 30, 2013, from http://www.i-runway.com/images/pdf/Increase%20ROI%20of%20Your%20Patent%20Portfolio.pdf James & Wells(2011). Overseas Patent Filing Strategy- Choosing Countries. Retrieved March 8, 2013, from http://www.jaws.co.nz/media/32187/overseas%20patent%20filing%20strategy%20-%20choosing%20countries.pdf JPO(2012). Progress in PPH. Retrieved April 30, 2013, from http://www.trilateral.net/events/meetings/nov2012/jpo-pph.pdf Knight, H. Jackson(2001). Patent Strategy: For Researchers and Research Managers. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Korkeamaki, Timo & Takalo, Thomas(2010). Valuation of Innovation: The Case of iPhone. Retrieved March 8, 2013, from http://ssrn.com/ abstract=1731987 Kraemer, Kenneth L., Linden, Greg & Dedrick, Jason(2011). Capturing Value in Global Networks: Apple’s iPad and IPhone. Retrieved April 30, 2013, from http://pcic.merage.uci.edu/papers/2011/Value_iPad_iPhone.pdf Lloyd, Mike, Spielthenner, Doris & Mokdsi, George(2011). The Smartphone Patent Wars. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://www.ambercite.com/downloads/The%20Smartphone%20Patent%20Wars%20whitepaper_March%202011.pdf Miele, Anthony L.(2000). Patent Strategy: The Manager’s Guide to Profiting from Patent Portfolios. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. O’Connor, Daniel(2012). One in Six Active U.S. Patents Pertain to the Smartphone. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://www.project-disco.org/intellectual-property/one-in-six-active-u-s-patents-pertain-to-the-smartphone/ Ove, Granstrand(1999). The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. Samsung(2012). Samsung Electronics Sustainability Report 2012. Retrieved March 8, 2013, from http://www.samsung.com/us/aboutsamsung/sustainability/sustainabilityreports/download/2012/2012_sustainability_rpt.pdf Shumaker, Steven J.(2002). Building a Patent Portfolio that Supports Your Business Objectives. Retrieved March 8, 2013, from http://www.ssiplaw.com/files/strategy.pdf Somaya, Deepak(2002). Theoretical Perspectives on Patent Strategy. Retrieved April 30, 2013, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.195.354&rep=rep1&type=pdf Techdirt(2010). Meet the Patent Thicket: Who's Suing Who for Smartphone Patents. Retrieved April 30, 2013, from http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20101007/22591311328/meet-the-patent-thicket-who-s-suing-who-for-smartphone-patents.shtml Thomas, Patrick & Breitzman, Anthony(2011). Apple Has the Most Powerful Patent Portfolio in Consumer Electronics. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/innovation/apple-has-the-most-powerful-patent-portfolio-in-consumer-electronics Thomson Reuters(2012). Inside the iPhone Patent Portfolio. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/iphone-report.pdf Wagner, R. Polk & Parchomovsky, Gideon(2005). “Patent Portfolios”. Public Law Working Paper 56. U of Penn. Law School. WIPO(2013a). 2013 PCT Yearly Review. Retrieved April 30, 2013, from http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/freepublications/en/patents/901/wipo_pub_901_2013.pdf WIPO(2013b). 2012 World Intellectual Property Indicators. Retrieved April 30, 2013, from http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/freepublications/en/intproperty/941/wipo_pub_941_2012.pdf WIPS(2013). The Comparison between Apple and Samsung’s Patent Portfolios. Retrieved March 8, 2013, from http://customer.wips.co.kr/mail/newsletter/2013/0117/Apple%20and%20Samsung_Final_Report_JP.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/61077 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討國際專利申請策略,並以智慧型手機為個案研究。專利策略包含:取得專利、授權專利、行使專利。國際專利申請是企業取得專利以提升競爭力的重要方法。企業必須決定是否申請、申請種類、申請國家、第一申請局、申請時機。國際專利申請可運用優先權、專利合作條約(PCT)申請、區域組織申請、美國暫時申請及延續申請、專利審查高速公路(PPH)、加速審查等策略,並可統合運用以符合企業目的及預算要求。智慧型手機專利具有專利叢林、訴訟及交易活動頻繁、與產業標準密切相關等特性。本研究討論蘋果公司、三星電子、宏達電、華為科技、中興通訊等智慧型手機大廠之國際申請策略。所討論公司均廣泛運用優先權,大部分亦都廣泛運用PCT申請及區域組織申請,但宏達電極少運用PCT申請。蘋果公司及三星電子在美國均擅長運用暫時申請以先佔優先權日並以延續申請不斷擴展專利權範圍。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study analyzes the international patent filing strategy, and smartphone patents as a case study. Patent strategy includes: patenting, licensing, and enforcement. International patent filing is an important way for corporations to acquire patents to enhance their competitiveness. Corporations need to decide whether to file, filing type, filing countries, first office to file, and filing time. International patent filing strategy utilizes claiming priorities, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications, regional organization applications, and provisional applications and continuing applications in the United States, the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH), accelerated examination, and the use of integration to meet corporation goals and budget requirements. Smartphone patents have the characteristics of patent thickets, frequent litigations and transactions, close relationships with industry standards. This study discusses the international filing strategy of the smartphone manufacturers including Apple Inc., Samsung Electronics, HTC, Huawei Technologies, and ZTE. Discussed manufactures widely use international priority, most of them also use PCT applications and regional organization applications extensively, but HTC rarely uses PCT application. Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics are good at using provisonal applications to anticipate priority dates and continuing applications to expand the patent scope in the United States. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T10:45:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-P00748002-1.pdf: 1966448 bytes, checksum: 3da1444dd3a202ec6dd0929fb7810ede (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書…………………………………………………………1
誌謝………………………………………………………………Ⅰ 中文摘要………………………………………………………………Ⅲ 英文摘要………………………………………………………………Ⅳ 目錄…………………………………………………………………Ⅴ 圖目錄…………………………………………………………………Ⅶ 表目錄………………………………………………………………Ⅸ 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景與動機…………………………………………1 第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………4 第三節 研究方法…………………………………………………5 第四節 論文架構…………………………………………………6 第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………9 第一節 專利策略…………………………………………………9 第二節 國際專利申請…………………………………………15 第三節 智慧型手機產業競爭及專利分析……………………16 第三章 國際專利申請策略……………………………………………19 第一節 國際專利申請概論……………………………………19 第二節 運用優先權之專利申請策略…………………………29 第三節 運用專利合作條約(PCT)之專利申請策略…………35 第四節 運用專利區域組織之專利申請策略…………………38 第五節 運用美國暫時申請及延續申請之專利申請策略……42 第六節 運用專利審查高速公路(PPH)之專利申請策略……46 第七節 運用加速審查之專利申請策略………………………50 第八節 統合運用之專利申請策略…………………………50 第四章 智慧型手機之國際專利申請策略分析………………………57 第一節 智慧型手機專利概論……………………………………57 第二節 智慧型手機大廠的國際專利申請分析…………………60 第三節 蘋果公司…………………………………………………62 第四節 三星電子…………………………………………………71 第五節 其他公司…………………………………………………76 第六節 綜合比較…………………………………………………80 第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………………83 第一節 研究結論…………………………………………………83 第二節 研究建議…………………………………………………83 第三節 研究限制…………………………………………………85 參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………87 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 智慧型手機專利 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國際專利申請 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 專利申請策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | international patent filing | en |
| dc.subject | patent filing strategy | en |
| dc.subject | smartphone patents | en |
| dc.title | 國際專利申請策略分析:以智慧型手機為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Analysis of International Patent Filing Strategy: A Case Study of Smartphone Patents | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳忠仁(Chung-Jen Chen),林嬋娟(Chan-Jane Lin),余峻瑜(Jiun-Yu Yu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 國際專利申請,專利申請策略,智慧型手機專利, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | international patent filing,patent filing strategy,smartphone patents, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 90 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-13 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學組 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 商學組 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.92 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
