請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60628
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃芳玫(Fung-Mey Huang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Pu-Yun Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林莆芸 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T10:23:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-17 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-07-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-07-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 行政院主計總處,2015。《97年受僱員工動向調查報告統計表》。臺北:行政 院主計總處。(https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=25582 ctNode=3107 mp=1)(2020/5/8) 行政院主計總處,2018。《107年事業人力僱用狀況調查統計結果》。臺北:行政院主計總處。 行政院主計總處,2018。《107年薪資與生產力統計年報》。臺北:行政院主計總處。(https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=44264 ctNode=526)(2020/5/8) 勞動部統計處,2020。《勞動統計查詢網》。臺北:勞動部統計處。(https://statfy.mol.gov.tw/index02.aspx)(2020/5/8) 張紹勳,2017。《Stata在結構方程模型及試題反應理論的應用》。臺北:五南。 行政院主計處,2010。97年人力運用調查(AA020031)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫https://srda.sinica.edu.tw。DOI:10.6141/TW-SRDA-AA020031-1。 行政院主計處,2010。98年人力運用調查(AA020032)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫https://srda.sinica.edu.tw。DOI:10.6141/TW-SRDA-AA020032-1。 行政院主計處,2011。99年人力運用調查(AA020033)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫https://srda.sinica.edu.tw。DOI:10.6141/TW-SRDA-AA020033-1。 行政院主計總處,2012。100年人力運用調查(AA020034)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。DOI:10.6141/TW-SRDA-AA020034-1。 行政院主計總處,2017。100年人力運用調查(AA020035)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。DOI:10.6141/TW-SRDA-AA020035-1。 行政院勞工委員會統計處,2011。97年勞工生活及就業狀況調查(AH010008)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學 術調查研究資料庫。DOI:10.6141/TW-SRDA-AH010008-1。 行政院勞工委員會統計處,2014。98年勞工生活及就業狀況調查(AH010009)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。DOI:10.6141/TW-SRDA-AH010009-1。 行政院勞工委員會統計處,2014。99年勞工生活及就業狀況調查(AH010010)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。DOI:10.6141/TW-SRDA-AH010010-1。 行政院勞工委員會統計處,2014。100年勞工生活及就業狀況調查(AH010011)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。DOI:10.6141/TW-SRDA-AH010011-1。 行政院勞工委員會統計處,2015。101年勞工生活及就業狀況調查(AH010012)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。DOI:10.6141/TW-SRDA-AH010012-1。 李佳逸、高煌彥、余坤東、林宜真與諸承明,2014。「新進員工社會化與工作鑲嵌、離職意願之關聯探討以臺灣海運業為例」,《航運季刊》,23卷,3期,25-45。 陳勁甫與鍾武侖,2007。「工作滿足、組織承諾、工作尋找與離職傾向關係之研究-以某國際航空公司空服員為例」,《運輸學刊》,19卷,2期,191-213。 蔡淑鳳、陳文意、林育秀與梁亞文,2013。「台灣地區長期照護機構女性照顧服務員工作壓力源與工作適應、離職意願之研究」,《台灣公共衛生雜誌》,32卷,5期,476-490。 Ajzen, Icek. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683. Allen, David G., Kelly P. Weeks, and Karen R. Moffitt, (2005). Turnover intentions and voluntary turnover: The moderating roles of self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality, and risk aversion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 980-990. Arnold, Hugh J. and Daniel C. Feldman, (1982). A multivariate analysis of the determinants of job turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 350-360. Ashforth, Blake and Fred Mael, (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39. Becker, Howard S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32-40. Bem, Daryl J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological review, 74(3), 183-200. Bluedorn, Allen C. (1982). A unified model of turnover from organizations. Human Relations, 35(2), 135-153. Bonin, Holger, Thomas Dohmen, Armin Falk, David Huffman, and Uwe Sunde, (2007). Cross-sectional earnings risk and occupational sorting: The role of risk attitudes. Labour Economics, 14, 926-937. Card, David, Alexandre Mas, Enrico Moretti, and Emmanuel Saez, (2012). Inequality at work: the effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. American Economic Review, 102(6), 2981-3003. Chen, Zhen Xiong and Anne Marie Francesco, (2000). Employee demography, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions in China: Do cultural differences matter? Human Relations, 53(6), 869-887. Cole, Michael S. and Heike Bruch, (2006). Organizational identity strength, identification, and commitment and their relationships to turnover intention: Does organizational hierarchy matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 585-605. Dougherty, Thomas W., Allen C. Bluedorn, and Thomas L. Keon, (1985). Precursors of employee turnover: A multiple-sample causal analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 6(4), 259-271. Fishbein, Martin. (1967). Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: Wiley. Fornell, Claes and David Larcker, (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. Griffeth, Rodger W., Peter W. Hom, and Stefan Gaertner, (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463-488. Hom, Peter W. and Rodger W. Griffeth, (1991). Structural equations modeling test of a turnover theory: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 350-366. Hom, Peter W., Rodger W. Griffeth, and C. Louise Sellaro, (1984). The validity of mobley's (1977) model of employee turnover. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(2), 141-174. Johnston, Mark W., P. Rajan Varadarajan, Charles M. Futrell, and Jeffrey Sager, (1987). The relationship between organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among new salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling Sales Management, 7(3), 29-38. Kapteyn, Arie and Federica Teppa, (2011). Subjective measures of risk aversion, fixed costs, and portfolio choice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(4), 564-580. Katsikea, Evangelia, Marios Theodosiou, Robert E. Morgan, (2015). Why people quit: Explaining employee turnover intentions among export sales managers. International Business Review, 24(3), 367-379. Lee, Thomas W., Brooks C. Holtom, Linda S. McDaniel, John W. Hill, (1999). The unfolding model of voluntary turnover: A replication and extension. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 450-462. Lee, Thomas W. and Richard T. Mowday, (1987). Voluntarily leaving an organization: An empirical investigation of steers and mowday's model of turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 30(4), 721-743. Lo, Wen-Yen, Li-Yin Chien, Fang-Ming Hwang, Nicole Huang, and Shu-Ti Chiou, (2018). From job stress to intention to leave among hospital nurses: A structural equation modelling approach. Journal of advanced nursing, 74(3), 677-688. Mael, Fred A. and Blake E. Ashforth, (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123. Marsh, Robert M. and Hiroshi Mannari, (1977). Organizational commitment and turnover: A prediction study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 57-75. Meyer, John P. and Natalie J. Allen, (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. Michaels, Charles E. and Paul E. Spector, (1982). Causes of employee turnover: A test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, and Meglino model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(1), 53-59. Miller, Howard E., Ralph Katerberg, and Charles L. Hulin, (1979). Evaluation of the Mobley, Horner, and Hollingsworth model of employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(5), 509-517. Mobley, William H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 237. Mobley, William H., Rodger W. Griffeth, Herbert H. Hand, and Bruce M. Meglino, (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 493-522. Mobley, William H., Stanley Horner, and A. Thomas Hollingsworth, (1978). An Evaluation of Precursors or Hospital Employee Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 408-414. Mowday, Richard T., Lyman W. Porter, and Richard M. Steers, (1982). Employee-organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. New York: Academic Press. Ng, Thomas W. H. and Daniel C. Feldman, (2009). Re-examining the relationship between age and voluntary turnover. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 283-294. Nunnally, Jum C. and Ira H. Bernstein, (1994). The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory. (3), 248-292. O'Reilly, Charles A., III and David F. Caldwell. (1981). The Commitment and Job Tenure of New Employees: Some Evidence of Postdecisional Justification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 597-616. Peltokorpi, Vesa, David G. Allen, and Fabian J. Froese, (2015). Organizational embeddedness, turnover intentions, and voluntary turnover: The moderating effects of employee demographic characteristics and value orientations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2), 292-312. Porter, Lyman W., Richard M. Steers, Richard T. Mowday, and Paul V. Boulian, (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609. Pratt, Michael G. (1998). To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification, In Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations, edited by David A. Whetten and Paul C. Godfrey, 171-207. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Price, James L. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press. Price, James L. and Charles W. Mueller, 1986. Absenteeism and turnover of hospital employees. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press. Riketta, Michael (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358-384. Russ, Frederick A. and Kevin M. McNeilly, (1995). Links among satisfaction, commitment, and turnover intentions: The moderating effect of experience, gender, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 34(1), 57-65. Sager, Jeffrey K., P. Rajan Varadarajan, and Charles M. Futrell, (1988). Understanding salesperson turnover: A partial evaluation of Mobley's turnover process model. Journal of Personal Selling Sales Management, 8(1), 21-36. Gerald R. Salancik and Jeffrey Pfeffer, (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253. Shaw, Jason D., John E. Delery, G. Douglas Jr. Jenkins, and Nina Gupta, (1998). An organization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 511-525. Steel, Robert P. and Nestor K. Ovalle, (1984). A Review and Meta-Analysis of Research on the Relationship Between Behavioral Intentions and Employee Turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(4), 673-686. Steers, Richard M., Richard T. Mowday, and Lyman W. Porter, (1979). Employee Turnover and Post Decision Accommodation Processes. Technical report, 22 Szilagyi, Andrew D. (1979). Keeping employee turnover under control. Personnel: the Management of People at Work, 56(6), 42-52. Tett, Robert P. and John P. Meyer, (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytical findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259. Van Dick, Rolf. (2004). My job is my castle: identification in organizational contexts. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 19, 171-203. Van Dick, Rolf, Oliver Christ, Jost Stellmacher, Ulrich Wagner, Oliver Ahlswede, Cornelia Grubba, Martin Hauptmeier, Corinna Höhfeldt, Kai Moltzen, Patrick A. Tissington, (2004). Should I stay or should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction. British Journal of Management, 15(4), 351-360. Van Huizen, Thomas and Rob Alessie. (2019). Risk aversion and job mobility. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization, 164, 91-106. Vandenberg, Robert J. and Jodi Barnes Nelson, (1999). Disaggregating the motives underlying tarnover intentions: When do Intentions predict thrnover behavior? Human Relations, 52(10), 1313-1336. Wiener, Yoash (1982). Commitment in Organizations: A Normative View. The Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 418-428. Williams, Larry J. and John T. Hazer, (1986). Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable Structural Equation Methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 219-231. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60628 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 過去學者多以工作滿足感、組織認同、風險態度來探討勞工轉職意願之因素,且少有研究經濟事件對勞工轉職意願因素影響。由於臺灣受到國內外經濟事件波及,導致臺灣實質薪資自2000年開始停滯,於2009年達到最低,故本研究轉職意願因素除工作滿足感、風險接受程度外,亦加入相對和絕對薪資來衡量薪資滿足感,觀察在2008年全球金融海嘯時,此三項變數對於臺灣勞工轉職意願之影響。若本研究能了解此金融海嘯影響臺灣前中後之勞工轉職意願因素,預期可提供勞動部參考建議,以利未來有負面經濟事件時做因應決策。 本研究使用主要資料2008至2011年「勞工生活及就業狀況調查」衡量薪資滿足感、工作滿足感和風險接受程度,合併「人力運用調查」模擬母體之薪資中位數後用以衡量相對薪資,並運用GSEM模型探討臺灣受金融海嘯衝擊前中後勞工轉職意願因素。實證結果指出,於2008至2011年間勞工薪資滿足感、工作滿足感和風險接受程度皆對於其轉職意願有顯著影響,但影響程度依勞工年齡層和金融海嘯影響臺灣期間而有所不同。未滿35歲年輕勞工影響轉職意願比重由大到小為薪資滿足感、工作滿足感、風險接受程度,受金融海嘯影響時勞工薪資滿足感在意程度上升,工作滿足感下降;而35歲以上年長勞工之轉職意願因素則更明顯變化,2008年影響轉職意願比重由大到小為工作滿足感、薪資滿足感、風險接受程度,然於2009年受此事件波及時,年長勞工反而最在意薪資滿足感,其次為工作滿足感,最後為風險接受程度。因此發現當金融海嘯衝擊臺灣時,年長勞工之兩種滿足感對於其轉職意願影響變化彈性較大。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Turnover intention has been studied since early 1970. However, most of these essays take job satisfaction, organizational identification, and risk attitude as factors of turnover intention, but less of them consider extrinsic ones. Because Taiwan was affected by several economic events, not only did Taiwan start to have sticky wage since 2000, but also it fell to a new low in 2009. As a result, the study adds job satisfaction, wage satisfaction, and risk acceptance into the model, and then analyses whether these variables significantly influence workers’ turnover intention from 2008 to 2011. The Ministry of Labor can enact some proper policies to relieve the impacts of economic crises in the future provided that there is complete understanding of what caused turnover intention from the Taiwanese workforce. The research applied Survey on the Living Employment Situation of Labor between 2008 and 2011 to measure laborers’ wage satisfaction, job satisfaction, and risk acceptance. Besides, Manpower Utilization Survey was used to create median wage for measuring peer salaries. After the surveys were concluded, a GSEM model was run for analyzing Taiwanese employees' turnover intention before and after the financial crisis of 2008. The result indicated that these variables had prominent effects on worker's turnover intention but at different levels. The turnover intention of Young Workers under 35 was significantly impacted by wage satisfaction the most from 2008 to 2011. As for Old Workers over 35, they cared about job satisfaction the most in 2008. Interestingly, in 2009, wage satisfaction was more affected than job satisfaction. This demonstrated that Old Workers Over 35 were more likely to shift their satisfaction during the period. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T10:23:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0307202017571300.pdf: 2256259 bytes, checksum: 9240f7a55a7dafa28a470d51b04122a0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書摘要 i 謝辭 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機與目的 2 第三節 研究流程與架構 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 轉職意願與轉職行為 6 第二節 心理、社會和人口統計變數 7 第三節 模型使用發展及轉變 9 第四節 相關文獻比較 11 第三章 資料介紹 12 第一節 資料來源與特性 12 第二節 資料處理 13 第三節 基本敘述分析 17 第四章 模型與方法 30 第一節 模型假設 30 第二節 模型介紹:廣義結構方程模型 31 第三節 驗證性因素分析(CFA) 33 第五章 實證結果 40 第一節 轉職意願因素探討 40 第二節 不同年齡族群勞工轉職意願影響 52 第六章 結論與建議 55 第一節 研究結論 55 第二節 研究限制與建議 57 參考文獻 59 附錄 66 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 2008年金融海嘯與臺灣勞工轉職意願之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Financial Crisis in 2008 and Taiwanese Workers’ Turnover Intention | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳勁甫(Ching-Fu Chen),邱敬仁(Ching-Ren Chiu) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 金融海嘯,薪資滿足感,工作滿足感,風險接受程度,轉職意願, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Financial Crisis,Wage Satisfaction,Job Satisfaction,Risk Acceptance,Turnover Intention, | en |
dc.relation.page | 76 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202001301 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-07-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-0307202017571300.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.2 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。