請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60513
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃尹男 | |
dc.contributor.author | Jiu-Yang Chan | en |
dc.contributor.author | 詹鉅洋 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T10:20:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-23 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-23 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | ATC, A. (1996). '40, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings.' Applied Technology Council.
Applied Technology Council.(ATC). (2011). 'Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings.'ATC-58-1 75% Draft, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City,California American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE) (2006).”Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.”ASCE/SEI 7-05,ASCE,Reston VA, USA Baker, J. W., and Allin Cornell, C. (2005). 'A vector‐valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon.' Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34(10), 1193-1217. Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006a). 'Correlation of response spectral values for multicomponent ground motions.' Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(1), 215-227. Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006b). 'Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection.' Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35(9), 1077-1095. Baker, J. W. (2011). 'Conditional Mean Spectrum: Tool for Ground-Motion Selection.' Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(3), 322-331. Campbell, K. (2008). 'Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA horizontal ground motion model for PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra.' Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 139-171. Chiou, B., Darragh, R., Gregor, N., and Silva, W. (2008). 'NGA project strong-motion database.' Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 23-44. FEMA, P. (2000). 'commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA356).' Federal Emergency Management Agency. Huang, Y.-N. (2008). Performance assessment of conventional and base-isolated nuclear power plants for earthquake and blast loadings, ProQuest. Huang, Y., Whittaker, A., Luco, N., and Hamburger, R. (2011). 'Scaling Earthquake Ground Motions for Performance-Based Assessment of Buildings.' Journal of Structural Engineering, 137(3), 311-321. Haselton, C., Whittaker, A., Hortacsu, A., Baker, J., Bray, J., and Grant, D. (2012). 'Selecting and Scaling Earthquake Ground Motions for Performing Response-History Analyses.' Proc., Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. IBC, I. (2006). 'International building code.' International Code Council, Inc.(formerly BOCA, ICBO and SBCCI), 4051, 60478-65795. Jayaram, N., and Baker, J. (2010). 'Ground-Motion Selection for PEER Transportation Research Program.' Proc., Proceedings, 7th International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering (7CUEE) & 5th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering (5ICEE). Jayaram, N., Lin, T., and Baker, J. W. (2011). 'A Computationally efficient ground-motion selection algorithm for matching a target response spectrum mean and variance.' Earthquake Spectra, 27(3), 797-815. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), 2008. 2008 Interactive Deaggregations (Beta). https://geohazards.usgs.gov/deaggint/2008/ (last verified 03/29/2010) 黃尹男 (2011). '美國新一代房屋結構耐震性能評估法'結構工程第二十六卷第四期中華民國結構工程學會第59-74頁 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60513 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 美國ATC-58計畫於2012年提出房屋結構新一代耐震性能評估方法,將地震強度、材料性質、結構反應及損壞情況等參數,以機率式的概念引入評估方法,並以修繕金額、修繕時間及傷亡人數等業主較為關心瞭解之參數作為性能指標,以便工程師與業主能有效的溝通,協助業主做出適當決策。
上述新一代耐震性能評估方法共分基於地震強度、基於地震境況與基於地震危害度三種不同形式之評估,皆涉及縮放地表加速度歷時進行非線性動力分析,以求得結構反應分佈,進而決定房屋內各結構與非結構元件的損害情況以計算性能指標。其中B型基於地震境況之耐震性能評估,目的在推估特定地震境況(即某一地震規模與斷層距工址距離之組合)下房屋之性能指標,所使用之地表加速度歷時須能合理地反映此特定地震境況之加速度反應譜值之分佈(包括譜值大小、離散程度與適當譜形),否則將獲得與實際情況差異甚大的評估結果,將導致業主及工程師決策錯誤。本文旨在建議一適用於此型之耐震性能評估的地震歷時縮放方法。 本研究各選取50筆地震紀錄模擬三種選定之地震境況,以一棟十五層樓與一棟五層樓特殊抗彎矩鋼構架為例,討論三種地表加速度歷時之縮放方法,包含Conditional Spectrum Method、Unconditional Spectrum Method、Distribution Scaling Method,透過非線性動力分析求得兩範例構架最大層間位移、最大加速度、平均樓層加速度反應譜等結構反應,推估其結構反應在真實值正(負)20%內之信心水準,以探討各縮放方法對結構反應分佈之影響,進而建議適用於B型耐震性能評估之縮放方法。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The ATC-58 project in the United States developed and published next-generation tools and procedures for seismic performance assessment of buildings in 2012. In the ATC-58 procedures, damage is measured in terms of direct economic loss, indirect economic loss and casualties rather than by building component deformations and accelerations. Uncertainty and randomness will be captured in every step of the performance assessment process, including characterization of earthquake hazard, simulation of building response, damage assessment, and loss computation.
The ATC-58 procedures offer three different types of assessments, namely, intensity-, scenario- and time-based assessments. All three involve the use of response-history analysis. The objective of this study is to develop recommendations for the selection and scaling of ground motions for scenario-based assessment. The scenario-based assessment aims at predicting the loss for a specific scenario (representing by a combination of earthquake magnitude and distance). The ground motions scaled for the assessment should reflect the distribution of spectral acceleration for the specific scenario. In this study, a series of nonlinear response-history analyses were performed for a 15-story and a 5-story sample moment resisting frames subjected to ground motions scaled for three sample earthquake scenarios determined based on the aggregation data for the site of the sample buildings.Sets of ground motions were developed for each building and each earthquake scenario using three scaling methods, namely, Conditional Spectrum Method, Unconditional Spectrum Method and Distribution Scaling Method. The impact of 1) scaling procedures, 2) number of ground motions, and 3) ground-motion database on structure responses, including peak inter-story drift, peak floor acceleration, and floor spectral acceleration, was studied. Recommendations for ground-motion scaling procedures for ATC-58 scenario-based assessment were developed.Selections of 30 ground motions from scenario database for ground-motion scaling procedures(Unconditional Spectrum Method and Distribution Scaling Method) is recommended in this study. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T10:20:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00521234-1.pdf: 4696761 bytes, checksum: f81cb8904c0ca80a50cbe078e11a26b5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 論文口試委員審定書 i
誌謝 iii 摘要 v Abstract vii 目錄 ix 圖目錄 xii 表目錄 xiv 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 本文內容 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 前言 5 2.2 美國ATC-58房屋結構耐震性能評估法 5 2.3 縮放地表加速度歷時震幅之方法 11 2.3.1. 方法一:條件反應譜方法(Conditional Spectrum) 13 2.3.2. 方法二:不給定條件反應譜方法(Unconditional Spectrum Method) 16 2.3.3. 方法三:基於分佈縮放方法(Distribution Scaling Method) 16 第三章 地震歷時縮放挑選法之使用 23 3.1 地震境況(Earthquake Scenario) 23 3.2 地震歷時縮放挑選方法 24 3.2.1. 基準挑選方法 24 3.2.2. 條件反應譜方法(Conditional Spectrum Method) 24 3.2.3. 不給定條件反應譜方法(Unconditional Spectrum Method) 25 3.2.4. 基於分佈縮放方法(Distribution Scaling Method) 25 3.3 縮放方法所使用紀錄筆數及地震資料庫之選擇 27 3.4 示範模型介紹 28 第四章 縮放地震歷時對十五層樓結構之案例分析49 4.1 案例一之動力分析結果 49 4.1.1. 條件反應譜方法之分析 50 4.1.2. 不給定條件反應譜方法之分析 51 4.1.3. 基於分佈縮放方法之分析 52 4.1.4. 案例一之動力分析現象 52 4.2 案例二之動力分析結果 53 4.2.1. 條件反應譜方法之分析 53 4.2.2. 不給定條件反應譜方法之分析 54 4.2.3. 基於分佈縮放方法之分析 55 4.2.4. 案例二之動力分析現象 56 4.3 縮放方法之信心水準 56 4.3.1. 計算信心水準 56 4.3.2. ATC-58修正離散程度之公式 57 4.3.3. 討論縮放方法之信心水準 58 4.3.4. 選取較窄區間之信心水準 60 4.4 小結 62 第五章 縮放地震歷時對十五層樓結構之案例分析 101 5.1 案例三之動力分析結果 101 5.1.1. 條件反應譜方法之分析 102 5.1.2. 不給定條件反應譜方法之分析 103 5.1.3. 基於分佈縮放方法之分析 104 5.1.4. 案例三之動力分析現象 104 5.2 案例四之動力分析結果 105 5.2.1. 條件反應譜方法之分析 105 5.2.2. 不給定條件反應譜方法之分析 106 5.2.3. 基於分佈縮放方法之分析 107 5.2.4. 案例四之動力分析 108 5.3 縮放方法之信心水準 108 5.3.1. 計算信心水準 108 5.3.2. ATC-58修正離散程度之公式 109 5.3.3. 討論縮放方法之信心水準 110 5.3.4. 選取較窄區間之信心水準 111 5.4 小結 112 第六章 結論與建議 147 6.1 結論 147 6.2 建議 148 參考文獻 149 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 基於地震境況之地表加速度歷時縮放方法研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Establishing Ground-Motion Scaling Procedures for Scenario-Based Performance Assessment of Buildings | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 羅俊雄,柴駿甫,簡文郁 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 耐震性能評估,地震境況,縮放地表加速度歷時,歷時分析,條件反應譜, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Seismic performance assessment,scenario,ground-motion scaling,response-history analysis,conditional spectrum, | en |
dc.relation.page | 150 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.59 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。