Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60501Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張長義(Chang-Yi Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pei-Shan Sonia Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林貝珊 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T10:19:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-08-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中央地質調查所 http://www.moeacgs.gov.tw/main.jsp [2009/3/31]
中央氣象局颱風資料庫http://rdc28.cwb.gov.tw/index.php [2010/12/3] 中國地理學會 (2003) 原住民族傳統領域土地調查地圖集，台北：行政院原住民族委員會。 王鴻濬 (2008) 秀林鄉銅門村慕谷慕魚自然人文生態景觀區劃定說明書，花蓮縣秀林鄉公所委託規劃研究96A16號。 王洪文 (1991) 地理思想，台北：明文書局。 毛利之俊原著 (1933) 東台灣展望，臺東市 : 東臺灣曉聲會，陳阿昭主編，葉冰婷翻譯 (2003) 東台灣展望，台北市 : 原民文化。 台灣原住民族歷史語言文化大辭典網路版 http://citing.hohayan.net.tw/default.asp 旮日羿．吉宏 (2011) 太魯閣族部落史與祭儀舞樂傳記，初版，台北市：山海文化雜誌，原住民文發會，4-125。 旮日羿．吉宏、陳溫蕙美 (2007) 慕谷慕魚生態廊道景觀體驗導覽專書，花蓮：花蓮縣秀林鄉慕谷慕魚護溪產業發展協會。 李季順 (2003) 還我族名—太魯閣族：運動的緣起及發展，黃長興總編輯，還我族名—「太魯閣族」：爭取台灣原住民族第十二族 (太魯閣族) 緣起論述及分區部落座談成果報告書，花蓮縣：花蓮縣秀林鄉公所，7-20。 花蓮縣政府 (2005) 花蓮溪遊記第二部：山青綠映－銅門、清水溪、翡翠谷發現之旅，花蓮縣：花蓮縣政府農業局。 杜奉賢、行政院原住民族委員會文化園區管理局 (2009) 台灣原住民族數位典藏計畫-線上影音 http://vcenter.iis.sinica.edu.tw/index.php [2012/07/19查詢] 林鴻桂 (2005) 自然人文生態景觀區之規劃管理研究：花蓮慕古慕魚生態廊道之個案研究，國立台灣海洋大學環境生物與漁業科學學系，碩士論文。 林冠慧 (2011) 流域集水區人類與環境系統脆弱性分析架構之建立：台灣新竹縣尖石鄉大漢溪上游石門水庫集水區泰雅族部落為例，國立台灣大地理環境資源研究所，博士論文。 林素珍 (2003) 日治後期的理蕃：傀儡與愚民的教化政策 (1930-1945)，國立成功大學歷史學研究所，博士論文。 全國法規資料庫http://law.moj.gov.tw/index.aspx [2011/3/24] 法源法律網http://www.lawbank.com.tw/ [2011/3/24] 施添福 (1980) 地理學中的人地傳統及其主要的研究主題，國立台灣師範大學地理學研究報告，6: 203-42. 胡幼慧 (1996) 多元方法：三角交叉檢視法，胡幼慧主編，質性研究－理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，台北：巨流圖書公司，61-78。 李惠斌、楊雪冬主編 (2000) 社会资本与社会发展，北京：社会科学文献出版社。 陳向明 (2004) 教師如何做質的研究，初版二刷，台北市：紅葉文化。 孫大川主編 (2006) 秀林鄉志，初版，花蓮縣：花蓮縣秀林鄉公所。 夏禹九、林佩蓉 (2011) 原住民與自然資源經營：共同經營的理論框架，台灣原住民族研究季刊，4 (1): 39-66。 張長義 (1977) 地景等級之分析：旅遊資源價值之研究，國立臺灣大學理學院地理學系研究報告，9: 23-38。 梁炳琨、張長義 (2005) 原住民族部落觀光的文化經濟與社會資本：以山美社區為例，地理學報，39: 31-51。 倪進誠 (2013) 機會與命運：苗栗南庄泰雅地區觀光發展辯證，地理學報，68：43-68。 紀駿傑 (2001) 原住民、自然資源與共同經營，把人找回來：在地參與自然資源管理，花蓮：太魯閣國家公園管理處。 范若望 (2011) 原住民族文化保存之研究：以太魯閣族慕谷慕魚家族及慕谷烏歪家族族譜溯源為例，國立東華大學公共行政研究所，碩士論文 。 徐志明 (2009) 統計方法與資料分析：EXCEL在問卷分析之應用，初版，台北市：藍海文化。 黃炫星 (1991) 台灣的古道，台中市 : 臺灣省政府新聞處。 經濟部水利署第九河川局 http://www.wra09.gov.tw/ [2010/10/22] 葉美智 (2007) 社區林業之社會網絡分析：以南投縣國姓鄉猴洞坑為例，國立中興大學森林學系，博士論文。 蔡毓智 (2008) 社會網絡：社會學研究的新取向，思與言，46(1): 1-34。 蔡豐念總編輯 (2011) 歐菲莉災後20年 : 重返銅門，花蓮縣秀林鄉 : 花蓮縣秀林鄉公所。 潘淑滿 (2003) 質性研究：理論與應用，台北：心理出版社。 簡春安、鄒平儀 (1998) 社會工作研究法，台北：巨流出版。 廖守臣 (1977) 泰雅族東賽德克群的部落遷徙與分佈(上)，中央研究院民族研究所集刊，44: 61-206。 廖守臣 (1978) 泰雅族東賽德克群的部落遷徙與分佈(下)，中央研究院民族研究所集刊，45: 81-212。 廖守臣 (1984) 泰雅族的文化：部落遷徙與拓展，臺北市 : 世界新聞專科學校觀光宣導科。 廖守臣 (1998) 泰雅族的社會組織，花蓮市 : 慈濟醫學曁人文社會學院。 盧道杰 (2001) 分權、參與及保護區經營管理－以宜蘭無尾港與高雄三民楠梓仙溪野生動物保護區為例，地理學報，30: 101-24。 盧道杰 (2004) 台灣社區保育的發展：近年來台灣三個個案的分析，地理學報，37: 1-25。 盧道杰、陳律伶、台邦．撒沙勒、闕河嘉、裴家騏、蔡博文、王進發 (2010) 自然保護區發展共管機制的挑戰與機會，台灣原住民族研究季刊，3(2): 91-130。 盧道杰、闕河嘉、黃書娟、林鴻忠、汪中仁 (2011) 社區培力與資源保育：我國社區林業政策評析，台灣政治學刊，15(1): 137-204。 戴興盛 (2007) 反思經濟誘因、自然保育與集體行動，環境教育研究，5 (1): 1-39。 顏愛靜、官大偉 (2004) 傳統制度與制度選擇：新竹縣尖石鄉兩個泰雅部落共用資源自主治理案例分析，地理學報，37: 27-49。 顏愛靜、孫稚堤 (2008) 原住民地區共用資源自主治理之研究：以馬里克灣河域的護漁行動為例，地理學報，52: 53-91。 楊世瑩 (2009) SPSS統計分析實務，第二版，台北市：旗標出版。 楊南郡譯註 (2011) 臺灣原住民族系統所屬之研究，臺北市 : 行政院原民會，譯自臺北帝囯大学土俗.人種學研究室原著 (1935) 臺灣高砂族系統所属の研究，臺北帝囯大学土俗.人種學研究室。 臺灣總督府警務局 (1938) 理蕃誌稿 (全四卷)，台北市：臺灣總督府。 劉軍 (2009) 整體網分析講義：UCINET軟件實用指南，上海：格致出版社、上海人民出版社。 Agrawal, A. and Gibson, C. C. (2001) The role of community in natural resource conservation, In: Agrawal, A. and Gibson, C. C. (eds.) Communities and the environment: Ethnicity, gender, and the state in community-based conservation, London: Rutgers University Press, pp.1-31. Arnstein, S. R. (1969) Ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4): 216-224. Bailey, K. and Grossardt, T. (2006) Addressing the Arnstein gap: Improving public confidence in transportation infrastructure planning and design through structured public involvement. In: Schrenk, M. (ed.) CORP2006: Proceedings of the 11th International GeoMultimedia Symposium, 11: 337-343, Vienna, Austria. Barber, C. V. (2004) Parks and people in a world of change: Governance, participation and equity, In: Barber, C. V., Miller, K. R. and Boness, M. (eds.) Securing protected areas in the face of global change: Issues and strategies, Gland, UK: IUCN, pp. 97-135. Barrows, H. H. (1923) Geography as human ecology, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 13(1): 1-14. Berkes, F. and Folke, C. (1998) Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability, In: Berkes, F. and Folke, C. (eds.) Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-25. Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C. (2003) Introduction, In: Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C. (eds.) Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-29. Berkes, F. (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation, Conservation Biology, 18(3): 621-630. Bodin, Ö., Crona, B. and Ernstson, H. (2006) Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology and Society, 11(2). Bodin, Ö. and Crona, B. (2008) Management of natural resources at the community level: Exploring the role of social capital and leadership in rural fishing community, World Development, 36(12): 2763-2779. Bodin, Ö. and Crona, B. I. (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19: 366-374. Bodin, Ö. and Prell, C. eds. (2011) Social networks and natural resource management: Uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance, London: Cambridge. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J. and Labianca, G. (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences, Science, 323: 892-895. Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (2012) Bio-cultural diversity conserved by indigenous peoples and local communities: Examples and analysis, Switzerland: IUCN. Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1997) Participation in conservation: why, what, when, how? In: Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (ed.) Beyond fences: seeking social sustainability in conservation V2- A resource book, Switzerland: IUCN, 26-31. Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Pimbert, M., Farvar, M. T., Kothari, A. and Renard, Y. (2007) Sharing power: Learning-by-doing in co-management of natural resources throughout the world, UK: Earthscan. Brondizio, E. S., Ostrom, E. and Young, O. R. (2009) Connectivity and the governance of multilevel social-ecological systems: The role of social capital, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34: 253-278. Brosius, J. P., Tsing, A. L., and Zerner, C. (1998) Representing communities: Histories and politics of community-based natural resource management, Society and Natural Resource, 11(2): 157-168. Castree, N. (2003) Place: connections and boundaries in an interdependent world, In: Holloway, S. L., Rice, S. P. and Valentine, G. (eds.) Key concepts in Geography, pp.165-183, London: Sage. Chang, C. Y., Allen, J. C., Dawson, S. E. and Madsen, G. E. (2012) Network analysis as a method for understanding the dynamics of natural resource management in rural communities, Society and natural resources, 25(2): 203-208. Crona, B. and Bodin, Ö. (2006) What you know is who you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management, Ecology and Society, 11(2): 7. Crona, B., Ernstson, H., Prell, C., Reed, M. and Hubacek, K. (2011) Combining social network approaches with social theories to improve understanding of natural resource governance, In: Bodin, O. and Prell, C. (eds.) Social networks and natural resource management: Uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance, London: Cambridge, p. 49. Cumming, G. S., Bodin, Ö., Ernstson, H. and Elmqvist, T. (2010) Network analysis in conservation biogeography: Challenges and opportunities, Diversity and Distribution, 16: 414-425. Davidson, D. J. (2010) The applicability of the concept of resilience to social systems: Some sources of optimism and nagging doubts, Society and Natural Resources, 23: 1135-1149. Davidson-Hunt, I. J. and Berkes, F. (2003) Nature and society through the lens of resilience: Toward a human-in-ecosystem perspective, In: Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C. (eds.) Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53-82. Floress, K., Prokopy, L. S. and Allred, S. B. (2011) It’s who you know: Social capital, social networks, and watershed groups, Society and natural resources, 24(9): 871-886. Folke, C., Berkes, F. and Colding, J. (1998) Ecological practices and social mechanisms for building resilience and sustainability, In: Berkes, F. and Folke, C. (eds.) Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 414-436. Friemel, T. N. (2006) Applications of social network analysis (Introduction), In: Friemel, T. N. (ed.) Applications of social network analysis: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on applications of social network analysis, 2006, Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 13-17. Gay, L. R. (1992) Educational research competencies for analysis and application, New York: Macmillan. Gilchrist, A. (2009) The well-connected community: A networking approach to community development, Bristol, UK: The Policy Press. Gooch, M. and Rigano, D. (2010) Enhancing community-scale social resilience: what is the connection between healthy communities and healthy waterways? Australian Geographers, 41(4): 507-20. Grix, J. (2004) The foundations of research, 林育珊譯 (2008) TOP 研究的必修課：學術基礎研究理論，台北：寂天文化。 Gunderson, L. H. and Allen, C. R. (2010) Introduction: Why resilience? Why now? In: Gunderson, L. H., Allen, C. R. and Holling, C. S. (eds.) Foundations of ecological resilience, Washington: Island Press, pp. xiii-xxv. Hahn, T., Schultz, L., Folke, C. and Olsson, P. (2008) Social networks as sources of resilience in social-ecological systems, In: Norberg, J. and Cumming, G. S. (eds.) Complexity theory for a sustainable future, New York: Columbia University Press, pp.119-148. Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Folke, C. and Johansson, K. (2006) Trust-building, knowledge generation for adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden, Human Ecology, 34(4): 573-579. Hall, D., Hirsch, P. and Li, T. M. (2011) Power of exclusion: Land dilemmas in Southeast Asia, Singapore and Manoa: NUS Press and University of Hawaii Press. Hardin, G. (1968) The tragedy of the commons, Science, 162: 1243-1248. Holmes, K. J. and Wolman, M. G. (2001) Early development of systems analysis in natural resources management from men and nature to the Miami conservancy district, Environmental Management, 27(2): 177-193. Holt-Jensen, A. (1999) Geography, history and concepts: A student's guide, 3rd ed., London: Sage Publications. Janssen, M. A., Bodin, Ö., Anderies, J. M., Elmqvist, T., Ernstson, H., McAllister, R. R. J., Olsson, P. and Ryan, P. (2006) Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems, Ecology and Society, 11(1): 15. Johnston, R. J. and Sidaway, J. D. (2004) Geography & geographers: Anglo-American human geography since 1945, 6th ed., London: Oxford University Press. Knight, C. G. (1992) Geography’s Worlds, In: Abler, R. F., Marcus, M. G. and Olson, J. M. (eds.) Geography’s Inner Worlds, New Jersey: Rutgers University press, pp.9-26. Knoke, D. and Yang, S. (2008) Social network analysis, 2nd ed., Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Kofinas, G. P. and Chapin III, F. S. (2009) Sustaining livelihoods and human well-being during social-ecological change, In: Folke, C., Kofinas, G. P., Chapin, III, F. S. (eds.) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world, NY: Springer, p. 73. Lauber, T. B., Decker, D. J. and Knuth, B. A. (2008) Social networks and community-based natural resource management, Environmental Management, 42: 677-687. Lin, N (2002) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, 林祐聖,葉欣怡合譯 (2005) 社會資本，臺北市 : 弘智文化發行。 Lin, P. S. and Chang, C. Y. (2011) Towards sustainable community-based natural resources management in the indigenous Meqmegi community in Taiwan: Rethinking impacts of local participation, Natural Resource Forum: A United Nations Sustainable Development Journal, 35(2): 134-144. Lopez-Gunn, E. (2012) Groundwater governance and social capital, Geoforum, 43: 1140-1151. McDowell, L. ed. (1997) Undoing Place? London: Arnold. Meek, C. L. (2013) Forms of collaboration and social fit in wildlife management: A comparison of policy networks in Alaska, Global Environmental Change, 23(1): 217-228. Mehta, J. N. and Kellert, S. R. (1998) Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: A case study in the Makalu-Barun Conservation Area, Environmental Conservation, 25(4): 320-333. Mitchell, B. (1989) Geography and resource analysis, 2nd ed., UK: Longman. Newman, L. and Dale, A. (2005) Network structure, diversity, and proactive resilience building: A response to Tompkins and Adger, Ecology and Society, 10(1). Nkhata, A. B., Breen, C. M. and Freimund, W. A. (2008) Resilient social relationships and collaboration in the management of social-ecological systems, Ecology and Society, 13(1):2. Norris, F. H., Stevens, S., Pfefferbaum, B. Wyche, K. and Pfefferbaum, R. (2008) Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness, American Journal of Community Psychology, 41: 127-150. Oba, G., Sjaastad, E., & Roba, H. G. (2008) Framework for participatory assessments and implementation of global environmental conventions at the community level, Land degradation & Development, 19 (1): 65-76. Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action, New York: Cambridge University Press. Pattison, W. D. (1964) The four traditions of Geography, Journal of Geography, 63: 211-216. Patton, M. Q. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, London: Sage Publications. Peña, D. G. (2001) 自然資源共管的根, In: 裴家騏、楊南聰主編，把人找回來：在地參與自然資源管理，花蓮：內政部營建署太魯閣國家公園管理處，9-14。 Prell, C., Hubacek, K. and Reed, M. (2009) Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management, Society and Natural Resources, 22: 501-518. Prell, C., Reed, M., Racin, L. and Hubacek, K. (2010) Competing structure, competing views: The role of formal and informal social structures in shaping stakeholder perceptions, Ecology and Society, 15(4): 34. Putnam, R. D. (1993) The prosperous community: Social capital and public life, American Prospect, 13: 35-42. Rathwell, K. J., and Peterson, G. D. (2012) Connecting social networks with ecosystem services for watershed governance: A social-ecological network perspective highlights the critical role of bridging organizations, Ecology and Society, 17(2): 24. Rissman, A. R. and Sayre, N. F. (2012) Conservation outcomes and social relations: A Comparative study of private ranchland conservation easements, Society and Natural Resources, 25(6) 523-538. Sandström, A. and Rova, C. (2010) Adaptive co-management networks: A comparative analysis of two fishery conservation areas in Sweden, Ecology and Society, 15(3). Scott, J. (2000) Social network analysis: A handbook, 2nd ed., London; Thousands Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. Sikor, T., Barlösius, E. and Scheumann, W. (2008) Introduction: Public –private relations and key policy issues in natural resource governance, In: Sikor, T., (ed.) Public and private in natural resource governance: A false dichotomy? UK: Earthscan, pp. 1-18. Slocum, R. Wichhart, L., Rocheleau, D. and Thomas-Slayter, B. eds. (1995) Power, process and participation- tools for change, London: Intermediate Technology Publications. Stokowski, P. A. (1994) Leisure in society: A network structural perspective, New York: Mansell Publication. Tai, H. S. (2007) Development through conservation: An institutional analysis of indigenous community-based conservation in Taiwan, World Development, 35 (7): 1186-1203. Taylor, G. (1995) The community approach: Does it really work? Tourism Management, 16(7): 487-489. The Stockholm Resilience Centre (2010) Research for governance of social-ecological systems, http://www.stockholmresilience.org/ [22 December 2010] Valentine, G. (1997) Tell me about…: Using interviews as a research methodology. In: Flowerdew, R., Martin, D. (eds.) Methods in human geography: A guide for students doing a research project. Harlow: Longman, 116-123. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994) Social network analysis: Methods and applications, New York: Cambridge University Press. Zimmerer, K. S. and Bassett, T. J. (2003) Approaching political ecology: Society, nature, and scale in human-environment studies, In: Zimmerer, K. S. and Bassett, T. J. (eds.) Political ecology: An Integrative approach to geography and environment-development studies, New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 1-25. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60501 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究從自然資源治理的人類社會系統切入小尺度社區保育與資源治理之過程，在人類社會與環境生態系統為一個共同演育的整體過程，透過關係網絡的觀點分析社會關係運作以及權力結構與自然資源治理過程及結果的交互關係，並關注社會關係網絡與權力關係對自然資源治理過程與成效之關聯。研究目的包括在特定時間與空間尺度識別自然資源治理過程中的行動者與權益關係人及其之間的社會關係網絡與權力結構，並將人類社會系統與環境生態系統做為整體來理解自然資源治理過程中，社會關係網絡運作與資源治理方向的連結，從中掌握社會關係與地方回復力的實踐，並歸納詮釋小/跨尺度以地方為基礎的自然資源治理社會關係網絡運作對地方資源治理的成效與對社會運作之潛能。本研究自2007年以參與式取徑進入研究個案社會情境，主要以訪談與觀察等方式蒐集資料，輔以2011年問卷調查族人對環境與自然資源的識覺及對治理狀況的想法，試圖從質性觀點深入刻畫社會關係網絡脈絡，並輔以量化指標相互交叉討論。研究結果顯示社會關係網絡根植於地方的歷史文化脈絡以及當代的社會權力層次中，其在資源治理的過程中同時為催化與窒礙的雙面刃，且關係網絡在社會系統中作為資源治理資訊與權力流動的彰顯與自然資源賦權社會系統的共生演化將交互作用於資源治理而互為因果。本研究建議地方在自然資源治理前與過程中皆應關注社會關係網絡的樣貌與變化，理解其與資源治理及環境狀態的交互影響，以增長社區保育與小尺度自然資源治理的社會彈性，使資源治理過程與在地執行的保育計畫不僅在環境保育與生態資源能永續，亦能有助於人類活動的生計與社會福祉。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This research examines the social relational networks embedded in the environment during the process of local small-scale natural resource governance. To discuss the impacts and effects of social relations on environmental conservation, this study uses a network perspective derived from social-ecological systems studies. Using an indigenous village, Tongmen village, as a case study, this research aims to reveal social issues embedded within natural resources governance through a network perspective, and to analyze the relationships between patterns of social networks, efficacy of resource management, and local resilience building through an integrated social-ecological viewpoint. For a deeper narrative in the context of social relations and power structure, this study uses qualitative interviews and on-site observation as the main methods to collect data. In addition, questionnaires were used to collect quantitative data, including interviewees’ attributes, environmental perception and thoughts, and social network. The findings indicate that social networks act both as a facilitator and as an obstruction, and will further impact on the natural resources. Understanding the social relational network context of the community will help governors to fix the social problems of the local natural resources management project. This study suggests that more consideration should be given to the social relations before and during the process of local resources governance project, and before making policy decisions to make sure that the social conditions is health and will lead to a truly sustainable future, both environmentally and socially. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T10:19:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-F97228001-1.pdf: 5328718 bytes, checksum: 2c4c1cbc8d0be60eed64ded13587ae74 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
口試委員會審定書i 謝辭ii 中文摘要iii 英文摘要iv 第一章、緒論1 第一節、研究背景2 第二節、研究動機與目的5 一、研究動機5 二、發問與研究目的7 第三節、研究流程9 第二章、文獻回顧11 第一節、地理學人與環境研究的學術典範12 一、人地關係研究之學科傳統12 二、社會生態系統的研究觀點14 三、小結：二元到整合觀點的人與環境研究流變19 第二節、自然資源管理與社區保育20 一、自然資源管理的發展脈絡20 二、以社區為基礎的保育21 三、參與與賦權在社區保育與自然資源管理的意涵23 四、小結：從自然資源管理邁向人與社會關注的自然資源治理25 第三節、社會網絡在自然資源治理中的角色27 一、社會網絡27 二、自然資源治理中的社會網絡29 三、實證研究個案舉例33 第四節、小結：從社會關係網絡刻劃自然資源管理的人地互動40 第三章、研究方法41 第一節、社會網絡研究觀點42 第二節、研究架構43 第三節、研究方法45 一、研究設計：整合質性與量化的多元測定法45 二、資料蒐集47 三、資料分析54 四、研究限制56 第四章、研究區：花蓮縣秀林鄉銅門村57 第一節、研究個案選擇與範圍界定58 一、個案選擇58 二、範圍界定58 第二節、自然生態環境60 一、地理位置60 二、地質地形61 三、水文與水利設施62 四、氣候63 五、生態資源63 六、環境災害64 第三節、人文社會環境67 一、 人口與聚落67 二、族群與文化69 三、社區組織70 四、產業發展71 五、宗教信仰72 六、土地與資源權屬72 第四節、自然資源保育與管理發展歷程73 一、社區培力與共識溝通階段73 二、正式進入保育行動與規劃的基礎建設階段74 三、經營管理行銷及環境發展監測階段75 四、觀光蓬勃及法源依據醞釀的發展階段75 五、部落環境與產業永續治理的再溝通與轉捩階段76 第五節、社會關係網絡的輪廓：社區現況與相關行動者80 一、社區現況與發展80 二、相關行動者與權益關係人81 第六節、小結：銅門村自然資源管理的社會樣貌84 第五章、歷史文化脈絡鑲嵌的自然資源管理與社會關係網絡85 第一節、尋根溯源：舊部落時期的遷徙與日治時期的理蕃政策86 一、太魯閣族的源流與分布86 二、舊部落時期的遷徙與建社87 三、日治時期的理蕃政策：空間與社會的重組91 第二節、村、社區、部落與家：國民政府時期的銅門村98 一、鄉村設置與劃分：多元家族的銅門村98 二、村與社區、部落與家：當代銅門村的歷史意義與文化脈絡104 第三節、木瓜溪的兩岸三地：自然資源治理的歷史文化脈絡106 一、銅門、榕樹、七鄰：早期的家族關係在當代的投射106 二、從銅門村到慕谷慕魚：資源治理的起點與社會關係的轉變108 三、公部門在當代自然資源治理的角色與運作112 第四節、小結：歷史鑲嵌的資源治理政治生態115 第六章、當代自然資源治理的社會關係根源117 第一節、慕谷慕魚自然人文生態景觀區的倡議與爭議118 一、自然資源剝削的社會凝聚反作用力118 二、自然人文生態景觀區的推動理想與窒礙難行124 第二節、自然資源治理的居民屬性與社會紋理130 一、性別與年齡130 二、居住社區與部落的空間分布131 三、家族與其意義的當代詮釋132 四、部落人口外流以及回流134 五、職業組成與資源治理之影響136 六、宗教信仰與教會在部落中的社會力138 七、地方組織的成立與運作功能140 第三節、自然資源的在地認知與資源治理的地方詮釋142 一、從連結社會規範與資源利用的傳統 gaya 理解當代資源治理142 二、資源治理的在地詮釋：資源保育、文化依附與經濟誘因的施為147 第四節、小結：社會脈絡與自然環境共同演育的資源治理實踐154 第七章、從土石流災害到自然人文生態景觀區：社會關係與自然資源的共同演育157 第一節、社會關係與權力結構在資源治理中的動能158 一、社會關係網絡的樣貌與現況158 二、太魯閣族gaya與民族特性和當代資源治理的相成與互斥161 三、政治關係與權力運作作為資源治理實踐的途徑164 四、地方組織間的關係與資訊傳播的角色：協會、教會、部落會議176 第二節、自然環境擾動驅策的社會重組184 一、自然資源做為社會系統的賦權184 二、資源治理決策與利益分配在社會系統的雙面刃：自救會與委員會187 第三節、小結：再思考人地關係—資源治理過程與地景變化的關係網絡189 第八章、結論與建議191 第一節、結論與建議192 第二節、後續研究方向197 參考文獻199 附錄209 一、太魯閣族語名詞翻譯與釋義210 二、相關法令211 1、發展觀光條例 211 2、自然人文生態景觀區劃定作業要點212 3、自然人文生態景觀區專業導覽人員管理辦法213 4、花蓮縣自然人文生態景觀區劃定審議委員會設置作業要點214 三、銅門村自然資源管理的社會網絡問卷216 四、基本屬性次數分配表218 五、資源利用方式次數分配表220 六、不同家族受訪者參加資源保育原因之差異分析摘要表221 七、不同家族受訪者沒有參加資源保育原因之差異分析摘要表225 八、不同家族受訪者知道自然人文生態景觀區已經通過及其可能影響之差異分析摘表228 九、不同地方組織受訪者參加資源保育原因之差異分析摘要表232 十、不同地方組織受訪者沒有參加資源保育原因之差異分析摘要表234 十一、不同地方組織受訪者知道自然人文生態景觀區已經通過及其可能影響之差異分析摘要表236 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 社會-生態系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會網絡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自然資源治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 原住民族 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自然人文生態景觀區 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 人地關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政治生態學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Tongmen village | en |
| dc.subject | indigenous people | en |
| dc.subject | political ecology | en |
| dc.subject | social-ecological system | en |
| dc.subject | natural resource conservation and governance | en |
| dc.subject | Taiwan | en |
| dc.subject | social relational network | en |
| dc.title | 原住民族部落自然資源治理的社會網絡與人地關係：台灣花蓮縣銅門村溪流保育與推動慕谷慕魚自然人文生態景觀區為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Re-explore Human-environment Relations from a Social Network Perspective on Natural Resource Governance in Indigenous Areas: A Case Study of Local River Conservation Project and the Promotion of Meqmegi Natural and Cultural Eco-landscape Area in Tongmen Village, Hualien County, Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡博文(Bor-Wen Tsai),盧道杰(Dau-Jye Lu),倪進誠(Chin-Cheng Ni),闕河嘉(Ho-Chia Chueh) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 自然資源治理,社會網絡,社會-生態系統,政治生態學,人地關係,原住民族,自然人文生態景觀區, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | social relational network,natural resource conservation and governance,social-ecological system,political ecology,indigenous people,Tongmen village,Taiwan, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 238 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 地理環境資源學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf Restricted Access | 5.2 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.