Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 森林環境暨資源學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6041
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor盧道杰
dc.contributor.authorChih-Hai Linen
dc.contributor.author林智海zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-16T16:19:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-14
dc.date.available2021-05-16T16:19:56Z-
dc.date.copyright2013-08-14
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2013-08-07
dc.identifier.citation方國運 (2006) 溪流生態保育政策及推動現況,台灣地區封溪護漁論壇論文集,中華民國溪流環境協會。台北市。
王鑫、盧道杰 (1998) 社群參與及野生動物保護區的經營管理。國家公園學會。行政院農委會研究計畫報告。
台邦.撒沙勒 (2012) 尋找失落的箭矢:原住民狩獵文化的思辨。原住民族文獻 2(1):32-35。
任凱、王佳煌譯,Lofland, J. & Lofland, H. 原著 (2005) 質性研究法─社會情境的觀察與分析。台北:學富文化事業有限公司。
李永展 (2006) 環境正義與生物多樣性的共生策略—達娜伊谷案例分析。建築與規劃學報7(1):19-45。
余光弘 (1994) 雅美人食物的分類及其社會文化意義。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊76:21-42。
林曜松 (1997) 台灣野生動物的保育。環境教育季刊34:16-39。
紀駿傑與王俊秀 (1996) 環境正義:原住民與國家公園衝突的分析。臺灣社會學研究的回顧與前瞻論文集。台中:東海大學。
梁炳琨 (2005) 原住民族地區觀光文化經濟與地方建構之研究-鄒族山美社區之個案。國立臺灣大學地理環境資源研究所博士論文。
陳永禹 (2000.02.16) 打山豬 人類的原始衝動 用文化做幌子。聯合報,讀者投書。
陳舜伶 (2002) 原住民族運動中「權力法制化」進路的困局----兼論建構中的台灣原住民自治。國立臺灣大學法律研究所碩士論文。
陶子婕 (2011) 原住民部落發展與社區機制─以宜蘭縣大同鄉崙埤部落為例。國立臺灣大學森林所碩士論文。
崙埤社區發展協會 (2011) 崙埤社區營造簡介。宜蘭縣:崙埤社區發展協會。
黃明和 (2006) 封溪護漁適用法律規範之探討。台灣地區封溪護漁論壇論文集,中華民國溪流環境協會。台北市。
劉克襄 (1997) 台灣自然生態運動的發展與演變。環境教育季刊34:108-115。
溫英傑 (1997) 達娜伊谷生態保育與山美社區營造。河川與社區研討會。經濟部水資源局、台灣省水利局、中國時報系與時報文教基金會。
鄭凱方 (2006) 從宜蘭縣大同鄉崙埤部落的社區營造歷程探討原住民社造政策的落實。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
廖學誠、陳宛君 (2008) 民眾參與溪流環境保育-以宜蘭縣大同鄉及南澳鄉為例。2008年生態工程與溪流環境保育研討會。中華民國溪流環境協會。台北市。
盧道杰 (2001) 保護區管理的新趨勢-西方現代保護區學說之演進與發展回顧。保護區管理的國際新趨勢研討會。內政部營建署、中華民國國家公園學會。台北市。
盧道杰 (2004)台灣社區保育的發展,近年來國內三個個案的分析。地理學報37:1-25。
盧道杰、陳律伶、江慈恩 (2008) 封溪護魚(漁)資料庫建立及政策法規的回顧與檢討。行政院農業委員會林務局保育研究計畫。
盧道杰、陳律伶、台邦.撒沙勒、闕河嘉、裴家騏、蔡博文、王進發 (2010 ) 自然保護區發展共管機制的機會與挑戰。台灣原住民族研究季刊3(2):91-130。
謝本源主編 (2007) 宜蘭縣大同鄉紅土生命史。宜蘭縣:崙埤社區發展協會。
Abu, B. H. 1991. Development of the Native Chief Institution of Sabah. Boneo Review 2(2): 178-188.
Alix, F. 2002. Community mapping handbook – A guide to making your own maps of communities & traditional lands. USA: Lone Pine.
Berkes, F. 2009. Community conserved areas: policy issues in historic and contemporary context. Conservation Letters 2: 19-24.
Borrini-Feyerabend, G., A. Kothari, and G. Oviedo, 2004. Indigenous and Local Communities and Protected Areas: Toward Equity and Enhanced Conservation. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.
Borrini-Feyerabend, G., et al. 2010. Bio-cultural diversity conserved by indigenous peoples and local communities— examples and analysis. Teheran: ICCA Consortium and Cenesta for GEF SGP, GTZ, IIED and IUCN/CEESP.
Brown, J. and A. Kothari, 2011. Traditional agricultural landscapes and community conserved areas: an overview. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 22(2): 139-153.
Cooke, F. M. and J. Vaz, 2011. The Sabah ICCA Review: A review of Indigenous Peoples’ and Community Conserves Areas in Sabah. Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia: Global Diversity Foundation.
Dudley N. 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
Ghimire, K. B., and M. P. Pimbert, 1997. “Social Change and Conservation: An Overview of Issues and Concepts.” In Social Change and Conservation: Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas,ed. K. B. Ghimire, and M. P. Pimbert, 1-45. London, U.K.: Earthscan.
Graham, J., B. Amos, and T. Plumptre, 2003. “Governance principles for protected areas in the 21st century”. A discussion paper, phase 2, in collaboration with Parks Canada and Canadian International Development Agency, Canada.
Hales, D. 1989. Changing concepts of national parks. In Conservation for the Twenty-first Century, ed. D. Western, and M. Pearl, 139-144. UK: Oxford University Press.
Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.
Holdgate, M. and A. Phillips, 1999. Protected areas in context. In Integrated protected area management, ed. M. Walkey, I. R. Swingland, and S. Russell, 1-24. UK: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
IUCN, 1993. Parks and progress. IUCN, Switzerland.
Lasimbang, J. 2007. Malaysia: The The Changing Status of Indigenous and Statutory Systems on Natural Resource Management. Tailand: Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact.
Luping, H. J. 2009. Indigenous Ethnic Communities of Sabah: The Kadazandusun. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Ministry of Information, Communications and Culture.
Masaru, M. 2008. Indigenous Law and Native Court in Sabah: A Case Study of the Penampang Kadazan. In Legal Culture in South-East Asia and East Africa, ed. M. Masaru, and J. J. Baptist, 21-67. Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia: Department of Sabah Museum.
International Labour Organization (ILO) 1989. Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, C169.
Kothari, A. 2004. Protected areas and people: participatory conservation. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Biodiversity Issues for Consideration in the Planning, Establishment and Management of Protected Area Sites and Networks. CBD Technical Series 15: 94-99.
McNeely, J. A. 1994. Protected areas for the 21st century: working to provide benefits to society. Biodiversity and Conservation 3(5): 390-405.
Molnar, A., S. Scherr and A. Khare. 2004. Who conserves the world’s forests: community driven strategies to protect forests and respect rights. Washington D.C., USA: Forest Trends and Ecoagriculture Partners
North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and Economic performance. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Notoruss Tagal Committee. 2007. Profile of Kg. Noroturss Tagal Committee River Protection. Notoruss, Malaysia: Notoruss Tagal Committee.
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons - the evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Partners of Community Organisation in Sabah (PACOS) Trust 2008. Securing indigenous peoples' rights in conservation: Reviewing and promoting progress. Sabah, Malaysia: Association Okani and Forest Peoples Programme.
Pathak, N. eds. 2009. Community Conserved Areas in India – A Directory. Delhi, India: Kalpavriksh.
Russell, D., C. Harshbarger, 2003. Groundwork for community-based conservation: strategies for social research. NewYork, USA: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, 1992. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Principle 22.
Wong, J. Z. 2003. Current Information on Inland Capture Fishery in Sabah, Malaysia. Paper presented at the First Regional Technical Consultation of Information for Inland Capture Fisheries in the ASEAN Countries, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Wong, J. Z. 2004. The Success of the Tagal System: a sustainable community-base driverine fisheries resource management in Sabah. In Conservation & Management of Peat Swamp Forests & Other Wetlands in Sabah: Issues & Challenges, Proceedings of the Ninth Sabah Inter-Agency Tropical Ecosystem (SITE) Research Seminar, ed. F. Kugan, and V. K. Chey. Sabah, Malaysia: Sabah Forestry Department.
Wong, J. Z., S. Etoh and A. B. Sujang, 2009. Towards Sustainable Community-based Fishery Resources Management: The Tagal System of Sabah, Malaysia. Fish for the People 7(2): 18-23.
Wong, J. Z., 2011. Sabah Tagal Extending its Frontier- New experiments in sea and estuary conservation. Rod & Line 2011 Nov: 30-34.
網路資料
Malaysia Department of statistics http://www.statistics.gov.my/portal/index.php?lang=en Last visited 2012/2/29.
法規
Fishery Act 1985.
Sabah Fisheries Aquaculture Enactment 2003.
Native Customary Laws 1995.
漁業法
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/6041-
dc.description.abstract「原住民與社區保育區」(Indigenous & Community Conserved Area, 簡稱ICCA)是近年國際保育社會力推的社區治理棲地保育的政策工具,已有許多國家地區認可與支持,其是指由原住民或在地社區透過有效的慣習法或其他方法,志願性保育自然資源。台灣也有許多社區保育的個案,封溪護漁是其中最普遍的一種,其恰與沙巴的內陸漁業型的ICCA類同。本研究旨在比較分析沙巴推行內陸漁業型ICCA的兩個個案與台灣崙埤部落封溪護漁的經驗,探究台灣推行ICCA的潛力與挑戰。研究發現:1) 在社區內部的治理上:在地菁英與頭人所形成的強烈社區領導力、村民共同的價值與目標的凝聚、傳統與現代體制的嵌合、有效的規範與處罰、公開參與的決策機制、利益公平分配及社區能力等,是影響社區治理溪流及其漁業資源的重要因子。2) 國家法規與政策上:對比沙巴以原住民法庭與內陸漁業法支持其原住民社區的溪漁資源治理,台灣未能在法規政策的層面,給予封溪護漁足夠的肯認與支持,對社區的賦權也不足夠。3) 在其他外部支持因子上,馬來西亞沙巴的Partners of Community Organisations in Sabah (PACOS),顯現了保育與發展非營利組織在推行內陸漁業型ICCAs的重要協助角色;臺灣則有豐沛的政府社區計畫經費。總的來說,以台灣社區的能動量,是有相當推行ICCA的潛力,但須加強認可與支持等外部的體制配套,以賦予社區治理自然資源的正當性,並透過培力增加社區能力。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIndigenous & Community Conserved Area (ICCA) is a policy tool promoted by the international conservation community for community governance on habitat conservation in recent years, which have been recognized and supported by many State governments and authorities. A ICCA means the natural and/or modified ecosystems containing biodiversity values, ecological services, and cultural values, voluntarily conserved by indigenous and/or other communities through customary laws or other effective ways. We also have a few cases of community-based conservation in Taiwan in which the type of stream conservation is the most popular one that similar with the inland fishery ICCA in Sabah, Malaysia. Aiming to explore the potential and challenges of Taiwan to implement ICCAs, this study compared and analyzed 2 cases of inland fishery ICCAs in Sabah and the case of Lunpi tribe in Taiwan. The results show: 1. There are several influential factors to support community governance on streams and their fresh-water fishery resources, which include, the strong leadership led by local elites and head persons, common values and objectives of villagers, integration of traditional social norm and modern institutions, effective regulations and punishment, equity, public participation, and community capacity. 2. Regarding legislation and policies,while there are the native court and Sabah Inland Fisheries Aquaculture Enactment 2003 to support the indigenous community governance on inland fishery in Sabah, we couldn’t have sufficient recognition and supports by the government on the stream conservation, neither the empowerment of community. 3. About external supports: As it plays a key role on assisting and promoting inland fishery ICCAs for the conservation and development non-profit organizations in Sabah, for example, the Partners of Community Organisations in Sabah (PACOS), we have abundant fund sponsored by the community programs of the government in Taiwan. Generally, there is potential to implement ICCAs in Taiwan considering the power and capacity of local communities. Nevertheless, it needs improve the institutional arrangement of recognition and external supports to send the jurisdictions for the communities to govern natural resources, and to empower local communities for capacity building.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:19:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-102-R99625015-1.pdf: 7057500 bytes, checksum: d445dec4197c18ad654e0c5f2aec85c7 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013
en
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
目錄 III
圖目錄 V
表目錄 V
第一章、 前言 1
第二章、 原住民與社區保育區及其發展脈絡 4
第一節、 保護區經營管理典範轉移與參與式保育 4
第二節、 原住民與社區治理-人權的興起跟原住民與在地社區的角色 8
第三節、 原住民與社區保育區 (ICCA) 12
第三章、 研究方法 16
第一節、 田野資料收集方法 18
一、 參與觀察 18
二、 深度訪談 19
三、 社區作圖 (community mapping) 22
四、 個案的文獻資料蒐集與整理 22
第二節、 資料分析-體制分析 (INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS) 23
第四章、 馬來西亞,沙巴發展溪漁保育的回顧與個案 24
第一節、 沙巴,馬來西亞背景描述 24
第二節、 KADAZAN-DUSUN的傳統文化與TAGAL 25
第三節、 沙巴溪漁保育推展現況-漁業部內陸漁業的TAGAL SYSTEM 29
第四節、 個案 33
一、 Kg. Notoruss 34
二、 Kg. Babagon 41
三、 小結 45
第五節、 影響TAGAL SYSTEM推行的相關法令 46
一、 內陸漁業法 46
第六節、 非政府組織的協助-沙巴原住民運動團體 PARTNERS OF COMMUNITY (PACOS) 48
第七節、 小結 50
第五章、 台灣發展封溪護漁的回顧與個案 51
第一節、 台灣封溪護漁發展回顧 51
第二節、 個案 54
一、 泰雅族崙埤九寮溪 54
第三節、 小結 67
第六章、 比較分析與討論 68
第一節、 社區內部的治理 68
第二節、 國家法規政策比較 73
第三節、 社區外部的支持 77
第七章、 結論 78
引用文獻 80
附錄一、 臺灣各直轄市及縣 (市) 封溪護魚公告一覽表 (漁業署101.09.07統計) 84
附錄二、 九寮溪自然生態教育園區收費標準 95
附錄三、 九寮溪自然生態教育園區遊客注意事項 97
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title從沙巴經驗看台灣推行原住民與社區保育區的潛力與挑戰-以封溪護漁為例zh_TW
dc.titleFrom the Experiences of Sabah to Figure out the Potentials and Challenges to Implement ICCAs in Taiwan – The Case Studies of Stream Conservation.en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear101-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee趙芝良,湯京平,劉子銘,王進發
dc.subject.keyword社區治理,社會組織,傳統知識,賦權,封溪護漁,Tagal System,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCommunity governance,Social organization,Traditional knowledge,Empowerment,Stream conservation, Tagal System,en
dc.relation.page97
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2013-08-07
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept森林環境暨資源學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:森林環境暨資源學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-102-1.pdf6.89 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved