請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60279完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭佳昆(Chia-kuen Cheng) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yang Hong | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 洪樣 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T10:14:43Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-09-07 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2013-09-07 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.王珺譯，Barbara Fredrickson著，(2010)，積極情绪的力量，北京:人民大學出版社。
2.中華民國交通部觀光局網站，（2012），http://www.tbroc.gov.tw/。 3.王圓圓、陳雲浩、李京、蔣金豹，(2007)，利用偏最小二乘回歸反演冬小麥條銹病嚴重度，國土資源遙感，1, 57-60。 4.胡文青，（2007），台灣的公園，台北：遠足文化。 5.曾柏瑋、林晏州、黃文卿，（2004），太魯閣國家公園遊客之步道選擇行為，國家公園學報，14(2)，1-21。 6.黃昱瑄，(2011)，都市環境中認知自然度之影響因子探討，碩士論文，臺灣大學園藝學研究所，台北。 7.Antrop, M., & Van Eetvelde, V. (2000). Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes: visual image interpretation and landscape metrics. Landscape and urban planning, 50(1), 43-58. 8.Arriaza, M., Canas-Ortega, J. F., Canas-Madueno, J. A., & Ruiz-Aviles, P. (2004). Assessing The Visual Quality of Rural Landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 115–125. 9.Ayad, Y. M. (2005) Remote sensing and GIS in modelling visual landscape change: a case study of the north-western arid coast of Egypt, Landscape and Urban Planning, 73, pp. 307 – 325. 10.Benfield, J. A., Bell, P. A., Troup, L. J., & Soderstrom, N. C. (2010). Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 103–111. 11.Bell, S. (1999). Tranquility mapping as an aid to forest planning. UK Forestry Commission, Information Note. 12.Bernaldez, F. G., Abello, R. P., & Gallardo, D. (1989). Environmental challenge and environmental preference: Age and sex effects. Journal of environmental management, 28(1), 53-70. 13.Brabyn, L. (2005). Solutions for characterising natural landscapes in New Zealand using geographical information systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 76(1), 23-34. 14.Born, R. J. G. V. D., Lenders, R. H. J., Groot, W. T. D., & Huijsman, E. (2001). The New Biophilia: An Exploration of Visions of Nature in Western Country. Environmental Conservation, 28(1), 65-75. 15.Coeterier, J. (1996). Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape, Landscape and Urban Planning, 34, 27-44. 16.Ellsworth, P. C., & Smith, C. A. (1988). Shades of joy: Patterns of appraisal differentiating pleasant emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 2(4), 301–331. 17.Eliovson, S. (1971). Gardening the Japanese Way. London: George C. Harrop. 18.Hagerhall, C. M., Purcell, T., & Taylor, R. (2004). Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 247-255. 19.Herzog, T. R., & Bosley, P. J. (1992). Tranquility and preference as affective qualities of natural environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(2), 115–127. 20.Herzog, T. R., & Barnes, G. J. (1999). Tranquility and preference revisited. Journal of environmental psychology, 19(2), 171-181. 21.Herzog, T. R., & Chernick, K. K. (2000). Tranquility and danger in urban and natural settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(1), 29–39. 22.Herzog, T. R. (1989). A Cognitive Analysis of Preference for Urban Nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 27-43. 23.Herzog, T. R., Gray, L. E., Dunville, A. M., Hicks, A. M., & Gilson, E. A. (in print). Preference and Tranquility for Houses of Worship. Environment and Behavior. DOI: 10.1177/0013916511410422 24.Hull, R. B., Robertson, D. P., & Kendra, A.(2001). Public Understandings of Nature: A Case Study of Local Knowledge About “Natural” Forest Conditions. Society & Natural Resources, 14(4), 325–340. 25.Jackson, S., Fuller, D., Dunsford, H., Mowbray, R., Hext, S., MacFarlane R. and Haggett, C.(2008). Tranquillity Mapping: developing a robust methodology for planning support, Report to the Campaign to Protect Rural England, Centre for Environmental & Spatial Analysis, Northumbria University, Bluespace environments and the University of Newcastle upon on Tyne. 26.James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 307. 27.Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. CUP Archive. 28.Lamb, R. J., & Purcell, A. T. (1990). Perception of Naturalness in Landscape and Its Relationship to Vegetation Structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 19, 333-352. 29.Lee, L.Y.L. (2013). Powerful Labels? Impacts of different place labels on perceived naturalness. International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, Estes Park. 30.Mace, B. L., Bell, P. A., & Loomis, R. J. (1999). Aesthetic, affective, and cognitive effects of noise on natural landscape assessment. Society & Natural Resources, 12(3), 225-242. 31.Machado, A. (2004). An Index of Naturalness. Journal for Nature Conservation, 12, 95-110. 32.Mansvelt, J. V., & Kuiper, J. (1999). Criteria for the humanity realm: psychology and physiognomy and cultural heritage. In: van Mansvelt, D., van der Lubbe, M.J. (Eds.), Checklist for Sustainable Landscape Management (pp. 116-134). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science . 33.McCombe, C. Imaging Space Through Sound. In the proceedings of the 2001 UK and Ireland Soundscape Community conference. 34.Ode, A., Tveit, M. S., & Fry, G. (2008). Capturing Landscape Visual Character Using Indicators: Touching Base with Landscape Aesthetic Theory. Landscape Research, 33(1), 89–117. 35.Ode, A., Fry, G., Tveit, M. S., Messager, P., & Miller, D. (2009). Indicators of Perceived Naturalness as Drivers of Landscape Preference. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 375-383. 36.Palmer, J. F. (2004). Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts. Landscape and urban Planning, 69(2), 201-218. 37.Peron, E., Purcell, A. T., Staats, H., Falchero, S., & Lamb, R. J. (1998). Models of preference for outdoor scenes some experimental evidence. Environment and Behavior, 30(3), 282-305. 38.Pheasant, R., Horoshenkov, K., Watts, G., & Barrett, B. (2008). The acoustic and visual factors influencing the construction of tranquil space in urban and rural environments tranquil spaces-quiet places?. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 1446-1457. 39.Pheasant, R. J., Watts, G. R., & Horoshenkov, K. V. (2009). Validation of a tranquillity rating prediction tool. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 95(6), 1024-1031. 40.Pheasant, R. J., Fisher, M. N., Watts, G. R., Whitaker, D. J., & Horoshenkov, K. V. (2010). The importance of auditory-visual interaction in the construction of ‘tranquil space’. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(4), 501-509. 41.Raimbault, M., & Dubois, D. (2005). Urban soundscapes: Experiences and knowledge. Cities, 22(5), 339-350. 42.Reif, A., & Walentowski, H. (2008). The Assessment of Naturalness and Its Role for Nature Conservation and Forestry in Europe. Waldokologie, Landschaftsforschung und Naturschutz, 6, 63-76. 43.Rendel, S. (1996). A Tranquil Countryside?: The concept of 'Tranquil Maps'. Countryside Recreation Network News, 4, 9-11. 44.Roth, M. (2006). Validating the use of Internet survey techniques in visual landscape assessment - An empirical study from Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(3),179-192. 45.Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. 46.Schupbach, B. (2002) Methods for indicators to assess landscape aesthetic, in: W. Dramstad & C. Sogge(Eds) Agricultural impacts on landscapes: developing indicators for policy analysis. Oslo: NIJOS rapport. 47.Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2002). Visual illusion induced by sound. Cognitive Brain Research, 14(1), 147-152. 48.Scottish Natural Heritage. (2005). SNH’s Landscape Policy Framework, Scottish Natural Heritage Policy Statement 05/01. Inverness: Author. 49.Taylor, P. D. (2002). Fragmentation and cultural landscapes: tightening the relationship between human beings and the environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58(2), 93-99. 50.Teo, S. T., Yeung, M., & Chang, E. (2012). Administrative stressors and nursing job outcomes in Australian public and non‐profit health care organisations. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(9‐10), 1443-1452. 51.The Countryside Agency (2005) Understanding tranquillity: The role of participatory appraisal consultation in defining and assessing a valuable resource. CRN 92, March, The Countryside Agency. 52.Ulrich, R. S. (1986). Human Responses to Vegetation and Landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29-44. 53.Watts, G., Pheasant, R., & Horoshenkov, K. (2010). Tranquil spaces in a metropolitan area. In Proceedings of International Congress on Acoustics (ICA) 2010. 54.Watts, G. R., Pheasant, R. J., & Horoshenkov, K. V. (2011). Predicting perceived tranquillity in urban parks and open spaces. Environment and Planning-Part B, 38(4), 585-594. 55.Wohlwill, J. F. (1983). The Concept of Nature: A Psychologist's View. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the Natural Environment (pp. 5-38). New York: Plenum Press. 56.Zhang, J., Pantula, S. G., & Boos, D. D. (1991). Robust methods for testing the pattern of a single covariance matrix. Biometrika, 78, 787-795. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60279 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 現代人生活壓力大容易變得浮躁不安，而自然常常可以幫助人們獲得寧靜感。寧靜感主要會受到視覺刺激與聽覺刺激的影響。在視覺層面上，感知自然度和人為元素量體都會顯著影響寧靜感。在聽覺層面上，聲音可能也會具有感知自然度而且可能會讓人聯想到各種不同的景觀元素量體，這兩者是否會影響寧靜感則有待研究。
本研究請受測者對圖片、聲音及它們組合起來的影片就感知自然度和寧靜感進行評分。研究結果表明，在視覺刺激下，感知自然度與人為元素量體都會影響寧靜感，但是感知自然度的影響會來得更大。人為元素量體會通過感知自然度的中介效應影響寧靜感。 在聽覺刺激下，聲音會讓人聯想各種不同的景觀元素量體且會具有感知自然度。聽覺感知自然度與聽覺景觀元素量體都會影響寧靜感，但是聽覺的感知自然度的影響會來得更大。聽覺的景觀元素量體會部分通過感知自然度的中介效應影響寧靜感。 在視覺與聽覺雙重刺激下，視覺刺激與聽覺刺激都會顯著影響感知自然度，視覺的影響更大；視覺刺激與聽覺刺激都會顯著影響寧靜感，聽覺的影響更大； 感知自然度會顯著影響寧靜感，並且可以分為視覺與聽覺兩個層面。聽覺刺激的感知自然度會部分通過整體的感知自然度的中介效應影響寧靜感，視覺刺激感知自然度完全通過整體的感知自然度的中介效應影響寧靜感。 總之，無論從視覺還是聽覺角度而言，感知自然度對寧靜感的影響會比景觀元素量體來得大。感知自然度會受到視覺與聽覺的共同影響。景觀設計師可以從視覺與聽覺兩方面提高感知自然度來營造寧靜空間。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Pressure of modern life tends to make people stressful, but nature can often help people get a sense of tranquility. Both perceived naturalness and natural elements ratio have influence on tranquility. But whose influence is greater? Whether the influence of natural elements ratio on tranquility is through the intermediary effect of perceived naturalness? Tranquility is affected by auditory stimuli as well. Does auditory stimuli have perceived naturalness and provoke the imagination of landscape elements ratio? Auditory stimulation and visual stimulation produce a sense of serenity. But whose influence is greater? And what is the role of perceived naturalness in influence of auditory stimulation and visual stimulation on tranquility?
In this study, subjects were requested to score perceived naturalness and tranquility of pictures, sounds and videos combined by them. The results show that perceived naturalness and human elements ratio can affect tranquility, but influence of perceived naturalness is greater. The influence of human elements ratio on tranquility is through an intermediary effect of perceived naturalness. Perceived naturalness is found in auditory stimuli, and auditory stimuli can provokes the imagination of landscape elements ratio. Both perceived naturalness and landscape elements ratio have significant influence on tranquility, but the impact of perceived naturalness is greater. The influence of imagined natural elements ratio on tranquility is through an intermediary effect of perceived naturalness partly. Tranquility can be influenced by auditory and visual stimuli, but the effect of auditory stimuli is greater. Both the perceived naturalness of auditory stimuli and visual stimuli significantly affect perceived naturalness of the environment as a whole. The overall perceived naturalness significantly affect tranquility. However, influence of perceived naturalness of visual stimuli on tranquility is through an intermediary effect of the overall perceived naturalness while the influence of perceived naturalness of auditory stimuli on tranquility is through an intermediary effect of the overall perceived naturalness partly. In short, either from a visual or auditory perspective, influence of perceived naturalness on tranquility is far greater influence of landscape elements ratio. landscape architect can create a tranquil space by improving the naturalness through visual and auditory approach. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T10:14:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00628317-1.pdf: 7309206 bytes, checksum: ba6f7618e764ed844b596122f9cc7cab (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目錄 vi 表目錄 viii 圖目錄 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 感知自然度 4 第二節 寧靜感 8 第三節 自然對寧靜感之影響 14 第四節 小結 15 第三章 視覺刺激下感知自然度對寧靜感之影響 17 第一節 研究方法 17 第二節 實驗結果 22 第三節 小結與討論 32 第四章 聽覺刺激下感知自然度對寧靜感之影響 33 第一節 研究方法 33 第二節 實驗結果 37 第三節 小結與討論 44 第五章 視覺聽覺雙重刺激下感知自然度對寧靜感之影響 45 第一節 研究方法 45 第二節 實驗結果 49 第三節 小結與討論 54 第六章 結論與建議 55 第一節 結論與討論 55 第二節 應用與建議 57 參考文獻 58 附錄一 實驗一之網絡問卷 63 附錄二 實驗二之問卷 67 附錄三 實驗三之問卷 70 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 聽覺刺激 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 感知自然度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 寧靜感 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 視覺刺激 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Visual stimuli | en |
| dc.subject | Tranquility | en |
| dc.subject | Perceived naturalness | en |
| dc.subject | Auditory stimuli | en |
| dc.title | 視覺聽覺雙重刺激下感知自然度對寧靜感之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring the Influences of Perceived Naturalness on Tranquility under Visual and Auditory Stimulation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 歐聖榮(Sheng-Jung Ou),黃章展(Chang-Chan Huang),林晏州(Yann-Jou Lin),張俊彥(Chun-Yen Chang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 感知自然度,寧靜感,視覺刺激,聽覺刺激, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Tranquility,Perceived naturalness,Visual stimuli,Auditory stimuli, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 72 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 7.14 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。