請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60217
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 戚樹誠(Shu-Cheng Steve Chi) | |
dc.contributor.author | I-Wen Ma | en |
dc.contributor.author | 馬一文 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T10:13:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-08 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-07-17 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-07-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分 1. 呂漢琳 (2012),女性貼身商品銷售人員人格特質對其工作績效之影響-以適應性銷售行為為中介變數,國立中山大學碩士論文。 2. 李元墩、莊立民、藍俊偉 (1999),企業主管領導風格、員工溝通滿足水準及員工生產力關係之研究-台灣電子業之實證,陸軍軍官學校七十五週年校慶綜合學術研討會。 3. 吳嘉齡(2006),銷售人員之馬基維利傾向與銷售績效的關係:探討印象管理與勤奮工作的干擾效果,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文 4. 房冠寶 (2000),人格特質與工作績效的關聯性研究﹕以證券業後勤行政人員為例,國立臺灣科技大學碩士論文。 5. 周瑋軒 (2012),工作要求-資源模式、專業承諾與工作敬業心關係之研究-以南科及高科之高科技產業人員為例,國立高雄應用科技大學碩士論文。 6. 戚樹誠 (2016),組織行為,台灣經驗與全球視野。 7. 陳佳伶(2009),銷售人員特質、販售/顧客導向銷售、銷售績效之關聯-情境觀點與實證,崑山科技大學企業管理研究所學位論文。 8. 陳姿秀 (2003),國軍軍官的馬基維利主義傾向與同事評價關係之研究,第十屆國防管理學術暨實務研討會。 9. 陳俊宇(2002),馬基維利與霍布斯政治哲學中的人性論與政治實踐,東吳大學政治學系碩士論文。 10. 陳鋆坪 (2016),快速消費品商業模式之探討以食品產業為例,國立台北科技大學碩士論文。 11. 張正林 (2002),組織政治行為量表:一個本土化的經驗建構,國立中山大學碩士論文。 12. 張媛婷 (2016),工作敬業:知識傳播軌跡與近年聚焦議題,國立台灣科技大學碩士論文。 13. 郭永勝 (2018),貨運承攬業務人員馬基維利傾向與銷售績效的關係-以關係品質為中介變數,國立海洋大學碩士論文。 14. 彭怡芳 (2002),緊張、負面情緒與青少年偏差行為之研究 - 以台南地區為例,國立成功大學碩士論文。 15. 楊逸茹 (2018),台灣民生快消品(FMCG)產業經營績效與品種通路之關聯性研究-以身體護膚護手品類為例,國立政治大學碩士論文。 16. 劉仲矩(1995),馬基維利傾向與工作成效及工作滿足關係之研究-以壽險業人員為例,淡江大學國際企業學系碩士倫文。 17. 劉愛夌譯,超強君主論領導學,寶鼎。(原著最強のリーダー育成書,作者鈴木博毅Suzuki Hiroki出版於2017。) 18. 閻克文譯(1998),君主論,臺灣商務印書館。(原著IL PRINCIPE,作者Niccolò Bernardo Machiavelli 出版於1532。) 19. 盧毓文 (2002),情緒對類別學習之影響,國立政治大學碩士論文。 20. 羅慧雯 (2012),學生人格特質對學習成效的影響—學習動機與考試焦慮的調節作用,育達商業科技大學碩士論文。 英文部分: 1. Agnew, R.(1992). Foundation for a general theory of crime. Criminology, 30,47-87. 2. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart Winston. 3. Ashby,F.G.,Alfonso-Reese, L.A.,Turken, A.U., Waldron, E.M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning, Psychological Review,105,442–481. 4. Bennett, M., Bell, A. (2004). Leadership Talent in Asia: How the Best Employers Deliver Extraordinary Performance. Hewitt Associates, Singapore: John Wiley Sons (Asia). 5. Bless, H., Bohner, G., Schwarz, N. (1990). Mood and Persuasion:A cognitive response analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 331-345. 6. Chonko, J.A.(1982). Machiavellianism: Sex differences in the profession of purchasing management, Psychological Reports,51, 645-646. 7. Christie, R., Geis, F. L. (1970), Studies in Machiavellianism. New York:Academic Press. 8. Cox R.(1965).Distribution in a High Level Economy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. 9. Crosby. L. A., Evans, K. R., Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in service selling: An interpersonal influence approach. Journal of Marketing,54, 68-81. 10. Day, D. V. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42, 25-36. 11. Isen, A. M., Means,B.(1983).Theinfluence ofpositiveaffectondecision-making strategy. Social Cognition,2,18-31. 12. Kahn,W.A.(1990).Psychological conditionsofpersonalengagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724. 13. Locke, E.A.(1978). The ubiquity of the technique of goal setting in theories of and approaches to employee motivation. Academy of Management Review, 3, 594-601. 14. Macey, W. H., Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice, I, 3-30. 15. Maslach, C., Leiter, M. P. (1997).The Truth about Burnout: How Organization Cause Personal Stress and What to Do about it.SanFancisco: Jossey-Bass. 16. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422. 17. Person,C. A.(1984), Selling: Principle andMethods, Homewood, I11.:Irwin. 18. Phares, E. J., Chaplin, W. F. (1997), Introduction to Personality (4th ed.), NewYork: Longman. 19. Ramanaiah,N.V.,Byravan,A., Detwiler,F.R.J.(1994) RevisedNeoPersonalityInventoryProfilesofMachiavellianandnon-Machiavellian people,Psychological Reports,75, 937-938. 20. Rothbard, N.P.(2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagementin work and family roles.Administrative Science Quarterly,46, 655-684. 21. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., (2004). Job demands, job resources, and theirrelationship with burnout and engagement a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315. 22. Schaufeli,W.B.,Salanova, M.,González-Romá, V., Bakker,A.B.(2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92. 23. Schwarz, N., Bless, H. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning. InJ. P. Forgas (ed.), Emotion and Social Judgments. Pergamon Oxford, pp55-71. 24. Spiro, R. L., Weitz,B. A.(1990).Adaptive selling: Conceptualization, measurement,and nomologicalvalidity,Journal of Marketing Research,27, 61-69 25. Vleeming, R.G.(1979), Machiavellianism: a preliminary review, Psychological Reports, 44, 295-310. 26. Watson, D., Clark, L., Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. 27. Wiener,J.L., Mowen,J.C.(1985).Source Credibility: On theIndependent Effects of Trust and Expertise When Attractiveness is Held Constant,Working Paper,Oklahoma State University. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60217 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討業務銷售人員的馬基維利傾向對工作敬業以及業績表現的影響,並且以台灣快速民生消費產業之銷售人員為樣本進行研究,從中探究管理意涵。研究方法以問卷調查進行抽樣,並且針對有效樣本做量化統計與分析,希望研究結果能協助管理者檢視銷售人員之性格特質對其銷售行為之影響。主要研究目的如下: 一、 探討馬基維利傾向與業務銷售職業的關聯性。 二、 探討馬基維利傾向與工作敬業度間的關聯性。 三、 探討馬基維利傾向與工作績效的關聯性。 四、 探討馬基維利傾向與工作績效的關聯性是否受到工作任務分配的調節作用。 馬基維利傾向作為性格特質常被一言蔽之詮釋為:「為達目的不擇手段」。這樣的概念和「積極進取,爭取勝利」程度上皆是教人要達成目標,但為何馬基維利傾向卻成為了負面性格特質?差異在於「不擇手段」。當個人願意為了自私的目的不擇手段,可能造成管理上的風險或團隊的不和諧。在人力資源管理的招募與任用中,管理者多半經由主觀判斷來做人力資源管理決策,未經實證研究的管理決策,也有可能抹煞了部分組織中具備潛力的負向性格傾向者,或是本質上誤會了馬基維利傾向對於工作績效的關聯性。 雖說「性格可以影響命運」,但是本研究更想透過科學方法驗證,「性格可以改變績效」,只要透過「對症下藥」的組織制度與管理手段,組織內部充斥的各種性格傾向的個人,不論正向或負向性格,只要能夠依照個人行為及性格特質放入組織架構內對的位置,也能發揮效益與個人價值。 高馬基維利傾向者具備了「不擇手段」的特質,在性格上與「使命必達」的特質有本質上的差異,但對於組織管理者而言,若能夠洞悉組織成員的特質,並且取其長、避其輕,並且投入制度設計予以調節,才能夠促進就業平等,排除任用歧見。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study explores the impact of sales personnel's Machiavelli's tendency on work dedication and performance and uses sales personnel from Taiwan's FMCG industry as a sample to explore management implications. The research method is sampling by questionnaire survey and quantitative statistics and analysis are conducted on effective samples. It is hoped that the research results can help managers to examine the influence of salesperson's personality traits on their sales behavior. The main research objectives are as follows: 1. Explore the relevance of Machiavelli's tendency to business sales occupations. 2. To explore the correlation between Machiavelli's tendency and work engagement. 3. Discuss the relevance of Machiavelli's tendency and job performance. 4. Discuss whether the relevance of Machiavelli's tendency and job performance is regulated by job assignment. Machiavelli's tendency as a personality trait is often interpreted in one sentence: 'Any way to achieve a goal.' This concept and the degree of 'active aggressiveness to win' are teaching people to achieve their goals, but why did Machiavelli tend to become a negative personality trait? The difference lies in 'unscrupulous means.' When individuals are willing to do whatever they want for selfish purposes, it may cause management risks or team disharmony. In the recruitment and appointment of human resource management, most managers make human resource management decisions through subjective judgment. Management decisions without empirical research may also wipe out the negative personality tendency or the essence of potential in some organizations. I misunderstood the relevance of Machiavelli's tendency to job performance. Although 'character can affect fate', this study wants to verify through scientific methods that 'character can change performance' as long as the organization system and management methods of 'appropriate medicine' are used to fill individuals with various personality trends in the organization, regardless of positive or a negative personality as long as it can be placed in the right position within the organizational structure according to personal behavior and personality traits, it can also exert benefits and personal value. Those with a high Machiavelli tendency have the traits of 'unscrupulous means' which are essentially different from the traits of 'mission must achieve', but for organizational management, if they can gain insight into the traits of the members of the organization and take their strengths avoiding its lightness, and investing in the design of the system to adjust, can promote equality in employment and eliminate differences in appointments. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T10:13:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0807202001394100.pdf: 1060617 bytes, checksum: f5bb14353b9e6fe1e80746e8f37d1a70 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄 口試委員會審定書……………………………………………………………… i 誌謝………………………………………………………………………………. ii 中文摘要………………………………………………………………………… iii 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………. iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究步驟 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 馬基維利傾向 6 第二節 工作敬業 13 第三節 銷售工作與人員激勵 19 第四節 假說推導 23 第三章 研究方法 26 第一節 研究架構 26 第二節 研究假說 27 第三節 研究對象與抽樣設計 28 第四節 研究工具 30 第五節 資料處理與分析 32 第四章 研究結果 33 第一節 研究對象與樣本敘述 33 第二節 信度分析 34 第三節 迴歸分析 37 第五章 研究結論與建議 42 第一節 研究討論 42 第二節 理論貢獻與管理意涵 44 第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 47 參考文獻 48 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 探討銷售人員之馬基維利傾向對工作敬業與業績表現的影響 - 以民生快速消費品產業(FMCG)員工為樣本 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Discuss the influence of sales staff's Machiavelli tendency on work engagement and performance-A sample of FMCG employees | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉念棋(Nien-Chi Liu),黃家齊(Jia-Chi Huang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 馬基維利,工作敬業,人力資源管理,績效,組織行為,民生快速消費品產業, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Machiavelli,work dedication,human resource management,performance,organizational behavior, | en |
dc.relation.page | 60 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202001375 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-07-08 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 進修推廣學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 事業經營碩士在職學位學程 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 事業經營碩士在職學位學程 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-0807202001394100.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.04 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。