請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60148
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 郭柏齡(Po-Ling Kuo) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chiu Kao | en |
dc.contributor.author | 高于媝 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:59:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-08 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-02-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-11-30 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Junttila, M.R. and F.J.d. Sauvage, Influence of tumour micro-environment heterogeneity on therapeutic response. Nature, 2013. 501: p. 346–354.
2. Lo, C.-M., et al., Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophysical journal, 2000. 79(1): p. 144-152. 3. Friedl, P. and K. Wolf, Plasticity of cell migration: a multiscale tuning model. The Journal of Cell Biology, 2009. 1: p. 11-19. 4. Geho, D.H., et al., Physiological Mechanisms of Tumor-Cell Invasion and Migration. Physiology, 2005. 20: p. 194-200. 5. Yamaguchi, H. and J. Condeelis, Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell migration and invasion. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2007. 1773: p. 642-652. 6. Ridley, A.J., et al., Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back. Science, 2003. 302(5651): p. 6. 7. Vicente-Manzanares, M., D.J. Webb, and A.R. Horwitz, Cell migration at a glance. Journal of Cell Science, 2005. 118: p. 4917-4919. 8. Lamalice, L., F.L. Boeuf, and J. Huot, Endothelial Cell Migration During Angiogenesis. Circulation Research 2007. 100: p. 782-794. 9. Mattila, P.K. and P. Lappalainen, Filopodia: molecular architecture and cellular functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2008. 6: p. 446-454. 10. Roussos, E.T., J.S. Condeelis, and A. Patsialou, Chemotaxis in cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer, 2011. 11: p. 573-587. 11. Saadi, W., et al., A parallel-gradient microfluidic chamber for quantitative analysis of breast cancer cell chemotaxis. Biomed Microdevices, 2006. 2: p. 109-118. 12. Li, S., et al., The role of the dynamics of focal adhesion kinase in the mechanotaxis of endothelial cells. PNAS, 2002. 99: p. 3546–3551. 13. Lo, C.-M., et al., Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophysical Journal, 2000. 79: p. 144-152. 14. Yan, X., et al., Lung cancer A549 cells migrate directionally in DC electric fields with polarized and activated EGFRs. Bioelectromagnetics, 2009. 30(1): p. 29-35. 15. Huang, Y.-J., et al., The Influence of Electric Field and Confinement on Cell Motility. PLoS One, 2013. 8. 16. Song, S., et al., Collaborative effects of electric field and fluid shear stress on fibroblast migration. Lab on a Chip, 2013. 13(8): p. 1602-1611. 17. Dan, P., et al., The role of mechanical stimuli in the vascular differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of Cell Science, 2015. 18. Bevan, H.S., et al., Acute laminar shear stress reversibly increases human glomerular endothelial cell permeability via activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. American Journal of Physiology, 2011. 301: p. F733-F742. 19. Li, S., et al., The role of the dynamics of focal adhesion kinase in the mechanotaxis of endothelial cells. PNAS, 2002. 99(6): p. 3546-3551. 20. Hsu, S., et al., Effects of shear stress on endothelial cell haptotaxis on micropatterned surfaces. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2005. 337(1): p. 401-409. 21. Pavalko, F.M., et al., Fluid shear-induced mechanical signaling in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts requires cytoskeleton-integrin interactions. Physiology 1998. 275(6): p. C1591-C1601. 22. Bershadsky, A.D., N.Q. Balaban, and B. Geiger, Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 2003. 19: p. 677-695. 23. Cukierman, E., et al., Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 2001. 294(5547): p. 1708-1712. 24. Deng, J., et al., Mesenchymal Stem Cells Spontaneously Express Neural Proteins in Culture and Are Neurogenic after Transplantation. Stem Cells, 2006. 4: p. 1054-1064. 25. Sunyer, R., et al., Fabrication of hydrogels with steep stiffness gradients for studying cell mechanical response. PLoS One, 2012. 7(10): p. e46107. 26. Engler, A.J., et al., Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification. Cell, 2006. 126: p. 677-679. 27. Plotnikov, S.V., et al., Force Fluctuations within Focal Adhesions Mediate ECM-Rigidity Sensing to Guide Directed Cell Migration. Cell, 2012. 151(7): p. 1513–1527. 28. Wang, N., J.P. Butler, and D.E. Ingber, Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science, 1993. 260(5111): p. 1124-1127. 29. Choquet, D., D.P. Felsenfeld, and M.P. Sheetz, Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin–cytoskeleton linkages. Cell, 1997. 88(1): p. 39-48. 30. Sheetze, M.P., D.P. Felsenfeld, and C.G. Galbraith, Cell migration: regulation of force on extracellular-matrix-integrin complexes. Trends in cell biology, 1998. 8(2): p. 51-54. 31. Harland, B., S. Walcott, and S.X. Sun, Adhesion Dynamics and Durotaxis in Migrating Cells. Physical Biology, 2011. 8. 32. Liou, Y.-R., et al., Substrate Stiffness Regulates Filopodial Activities in Lung Cancer Cells. PLOS ONE, 2013. 9(2). 33. Heldin, C.-H., et al., High interstitial fluid pressure — an obstacle in cancer therapy. Nature Reviews Cancer, 2004. 4: p. 806-813. 34. Yu, T., et al., High interstitial fluid pressure promotes tumor cell proliferation and invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma. International journal of molecular medicine, 2013. 32(5): p. 1093-1100. 35. Su, C., et al., High extracellular pressure promotes gastric cancer cell adhesion, invasion, migration and suppresses gastric cancer cell differentiation. Oncology Reports, 2016. 36(2): p. 1048-1054. 36. Zhao, M., Electrical fields in wound healing-An overriding signal that directs cell migration. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 2009. 20(6): p. 674–682. 37. Djamgoz, M.B.A., et al., Directional movement of rat prostate cancer cells in direct-current electric field: involvement of voltagegated Na+ channel activity. JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE 2001. 114(14): p. 2697-270. 38. AMBROSE, E.J., A.M. JAMES, and J.H.B. LOWICK, Differences between the electrical charge carried by normal and homologous tumour cells. 1956. 39. Pullar, C.E., et al., ß‐adrenergic receptor agonists delay while antagonists accelerate epithelial wound healing: Evidence of an endogenous adrenergic network within the corneal epithelium. Journal of cellular physiology, 2007. 211(1): p. 261-272. 40. Faupel, M., et al., Electropotential evaluation as a new technique for diagnosing breast lesions. European journal of radiology, 1997. 24(1): p. 33-38. 41. Szatkowski, M., et al., Electrophysiological recordings from the rat prostate gland in vitro: identified single‐cell and transepithelial (lumen) potentials. BJU international, 2000. 86(9): p. 1068-1075. 42. McCaig, C.D., B. Song, and A.M. Rajnicek, Electrical dimensions in cell science. Journal of Cell Science, 2009. 122(23): p. 4267-4276. 43. Wang, C.-C., et al., Asymmetric cancer-cell filopodium growth induced by electric-fields in a microfluidic culture chip. Lab on a Chip 2011. 11. 44. Chen, Y.-C., et al., Single-cell Migration Chip for Chemotaxis-based Microfluidic Selection of Heterogeneous Cell Populations. Nature, 2015. 45. Rodriguez, L.G., X. Wu, and J.-L. Guan, Wound-healing assay. Methods Mol. Biol., 2005. 294: p. 23-29. 46. HC, C., Boyden chamber assay. Methods Mol Biol., 2005. 294: p. 15-22. 47. Young, E.W.K. and D.J. Beebe, Fundamentals of microfluidic cell culture in controlled microenvironments. Chem Soc Rev., 2010. 39: p. 1036-1048. 48. Halldorssona, S., et al., Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices. Science Direct, 2015. 63: p. 218-231. 49. Zang, R., et al., Cell-Based Assays in High-Throughput Screening for Drug Discovery. International Journal of Biotechnology for Wellness Industries, 2012. 1: p. 31-51. 50. Shamloo, A., et al., Endothelial cell polarization and chemotaxis in a microfluidic device. Lab on a Chip, 2008(8). 51. Lin, F. and E.C. Butcher, T cell chemotaxis in a simple microfluidic device. Lab on a Chip, 2006. 6(11): p. 1462-1469. 52. Cheng, J.-Y., et al., A transparent cell culture microchamber with variablly controlled concentration gradient generator and flow field rectifier. Biomicrofluidics, 2008. 2. 53. Saadi, W., et al., Generation of stable concentration gradients in 2D and 3D environments using a microfluidic ladder chamber. Biomed Microdevices, 2007. 5: p. 627-635. 54. Hsu, T.-H., et al., Label-free quantification of asymmetric cancer-cell filopodium activities in a multi-gradient chip. Lab on a Chip, 2009. 7(9): p. 884-890. 55. Huang, Y., et al., Microfluidics-based devices: New tools for studying cancer and cancer stem cell migration. Biomicrofluidics, 2011. 1(5): p. 013412. 56. Mycielska, M.E. and M.B.A. Djamgoz, Cellular mechanisms of direct-current electric field effects: galvanotaxis and metastatic disease. Journal of Cell Science 2004. 117: p. 1631-1639. 57. McCaig, C.D., B. Song, and A.M. Rajnicek, Electrical dimensions in cell science. Journal of Cell Science, 2009. 122: p. 4267-4276. 58. Song, B., et al., Application of direct current electric fields to cells and tissues in vitro and modulation of wound electric field in vivo. Nature Protocols, 2007. 2: p. 1479-1489. 59. Huang, C.-W., et al., Electrotaxis of lung cancer cells in a multiple-electric-field chip. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2009. 24(12): p. 3510-3516. 60. Li, J., et al., Activated T lymphocytes migrate toward the cathode of DC electric fields in microfluidic devices. Lab on a chip, 2011. 11: p. 1298. 61. Li, J., et al., Microfluidic device for studying cell migration in single or co-existing chemical gradients and electric fields. Biomicrofluidics, 2012. 6(2). 62. Lin, F., et al., Lymphocyte Electrotaxis In Vitro and In Vivo. NIH Public Access, 2008. 181: p. 2465-2471. 63. Guyton, A.C. and T.G. Coleman, REGULATION OF INTERSTITIAL FLUID VOLUME AND PRESSURE. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1968. 150(3): p. 537-547. 64. ; Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lymph. 65. Nathanson, S.D. and L. Nelson, Interstitial fluid pressure in breast cancer, benign breast conditions, and breast parenchyma. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 1994. 1(4): p. 333-338. 66. Thorne, R.G., S. Hrabětová, and C. Nicholson, Diffusion of Epidermal Growth Factor in Rat Brain Extracellular Space Measured by Integrative Optical Imaging. Journal of Neurophysiology Published, 2004. 92(6): p. 3471-3481. 67. Fang KS, I.E., Oster G, Nuccitelli R, Isseroff RR., Epidermal growth factor receptor relocalization and kinase activity are necessary for directional migration of keratinocytes in DC electric fields. Journal of Cell Science, 1999. 112: p. 1967-1978. 68. Pu, J., et al., EGF receptor signalling is essential for electric-field-directed migration of breast cancer cells. Journal of Cell Science, 2007. 120: p. 3359-3403. 69. Iglesia, D.D.S. and J.W.V. Jr, Endogenous lateral electric fields around bovine corneal lesions are necessary for and can enhance normal rates of wound healing. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 1998. 6(6): p. 531-542. 70. Allen, G.M., A. Mogilner, and J.A. Theriot, Electrophoresis of cellular membrane components creates the directional cue guiding keratocyte galvanotaxis. Current Biology, 2013. 23(7): p. 560-568. 71. Tsai, H.-F., et al., Evaluation of EGFR and RTK Signaling in the Electrotaxis of Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells under Direct-Current Electric Field Stimulation. PLoS One, 2013. 8. 72. Wang, C.-C., K.-L. Lee, and C.-H. Lee, Wide-field optical nanoprofilometry using structured illumination. Optics letters, 2009. 34(22): p. 3538-3540. 73. Sinha, B., et al., Cells respond to mechanical stress by rapid disassembly of caveolae. Cell, 2011. 144(3): p. 402-13. 74. Parton, R.G. and M.A. del Pozo, Caveolae as plasma membrane sensors, protectors and organizers. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2013. 14(2): p. 98-112. 75. Dubroca, C., et al., RhoA activation and interaction with caveolin-1 are critical for pressure-induced myogenic tone in rat mesenteric resistance arteries. Cardiovasc. Res., 2007. 73(1): p. 190-7. 76. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caveolin_1. 77. Zhang, B.F., et al., Caveolin-1 phosphorylation is required for stretch-induced EGFR and Akt activation in mesangial cells. Cellular Signalling, 2007. 19(8): p. 1690-1700. 78. Luo, D.X., et al., Static pressure drives proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells via caveolin-1/ERK1/2 pathway. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2010. 391(4): p. 1693-1697. 79. Gortazar, A.R., et al., Crosstalk between caveolin-1/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and beta-catenin survival pathways in osteocyte mechanotransduction. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2013. 288(12): p. 8168-8175. 80. Umenishi, F. and R.W. Schrier, Hypertonicity-induced aquaporin-1 (AQP1) expression is mediated by the activation of MAPK pathways and hypertonicity-responsive element in the AQP1 gene. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2003. 278(18): p. 15765-15770. 81. Saadoun, S., et al., Impairment of angiogenesis and cell migration by targeted aquaporin-1 gene disruption. Nature, 2005. 434: p. 786-792. 82. Papadopoulos, M.C., S. Saadoun, and A.S. Verkman, Aquaporins and cell migration. Pflugers Archiv: European Journal of Physiology, 2008. 456(4): p. 693-700. 83. Loitto, V.M., et al., Neutrophil leukocyte motility requires directed water influx. J. Leukoc. Biol., 2002. 71(2): p. 212-22. 84. Stroka, K.M., et al., Water permeation drives tumor cell migration in confined microenvironments. Cell, 2014. 157(3): p. 611-23. 85. Hu, J. and A.S. Verkman, Increased migration and metastatic potential of tumor cells expressing aquaporin water channels. FASEB J., 2006. 20: p. 1228-1236. 86. Ribatti, D., et al., Aquaporins in cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2014. 1840(5): p. 1550-3. 87. Hoque, M.O., et al., Aquaporin 1 is overexpressed in lung cancer and stimulates NIH-3T3 cell proliferation and anchorage-independent growth. American Journal of Pathology, 2006. 168(4): p. 1345-1353. 88. Liu, B., et al., Protein kinase C-delta (PKCδ) regulates migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells through the mitogen activated protein kinase ERK1/2. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2007. 45(1). 89. McCoy, E. and H. Sontheimer, MAPK Induces AQP1 Expression in Astrocytes Following Injury. Glia, 2010. 58(2): p. 209–217. 90. Arciszewski, M.B., et al., Aquaporin 1 water channel is expressed on submucosal but not myenteric neurons from the ovine duodenum. Ann. Anat.-Anat. Anz., 2011. 193. 91. Nicchia, G.P., et al., Inhibition of aquaporin-1 dependent angiogenesis impairs tumour growth in a mouse model of melanoma. Journal of Molecular Medicine, 2013. 91(5): p. 613–623. 92. Kovbasnjuk, O., et al., The glycosphingolipid globotriaosylceramide in the metastatic transformation of colon cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2005. 102(52): p. 19087-92. 93. Machesky, L.M., Lamellipodia and filopodia in metastasis and invasion. FEBS Lett., 2008. 582: p. 2102-2111. 94. Pan, S.H., et al., The ability of LCRMP-1 to promote cancer invasion by enhancing filopodia formation is antagonized by CRMP-1. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2011. 121(8): p. 3189-3205. 95. Liao, W.-Y., et al., Heparin cofactor II enhances cell motility and promotes metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Pathol., 2015. 235(1): p. 50-64. 96. Ikenouchi, J., et al., Regulation of tight junctions during the epithelium-mesenchyme transition: direct repression of the gene expression of claudins/occludin by Snail. Journal of Cell Science, 2003. 116: p. 1959-1967. 97. Barrallo-Gimeno, A. and M.A. Nieto, The Snail genes as inducers of cell movement and survival: implications in development and cancer. Development, 2005. 132: p. 3151-3161. 98. Merikallio, H., et al., Snail promotes an invasive phenotype in lung carcinoma. Respiratory Research, 2012. 13: p. 104. 99. Ji, L., J. Lim, and G. Danuser, Fluctuations of intracellular forces during cell protrusion. Nature Cell Biology, 2008. 10(12): p. 1393-1400. 100. Rubashkin, M.G., et al., Force engages vinculin and promotes tumor progression by enhancing PI3K activation of phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-triphosphate. Cancer Research, 2014. 74(17): p. 4597-4611. 101. Stroka, K.M., et al., Water Permeation Drives Tumor Cell Migration in Confined Microenvironments. cell, 2014. 157(3): p. 611–623. 102. Kelley, L.C., et al., Cortactin phosphorylated by ERK1/2 localizes to sites of dynamic actin regulation and is required for carcinoma lamellipodia persistence. PLoS One, 2010. 5(11): p. e13847. 103. MacGrath, S.M. and A.J. Koleske, Cortactin in cell migration and cancer at a glance. Journal of Cell Science, 2012. 125: p. 1621-1626. 104. Leong, H.S., et al., Invadopodia are required for cancer cell extravasation and are a therapeutic target for metastasis. Cell Reports, 2014. 8(5): p. 1558-1570. 105. Wirtz, D., K. Konstantopoulos, and P.C. Searson, The physics of cancer: the role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nature Reviews Cancer, 2011. 11(7): p. 512-522. 106. Rizzo, V., et al., Recruitment of endothelial caveolae into mechanotransduction pathways by flow conditioning in vitro. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 2003. 285(4): p. H1720-H1729. 107. Radel, C. and V. Rizzo, Integrin mechanotransduction stimulates caveolin-1 phosphorylation and recruitment of Csk to mediate actin reorganization. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 2005. 288(2): p. H936-H945. 108. Joshi, B., et al., Phosphorylated Caveolin-1 Regulates Rho/ROCK-Dependent Focal Adhesion Dynamics and Tumor Cell Migration and Invasion. Cancer Research, 2008. 68(20): p. 8210-8220. 109. Stahlhut, M. and B. van Deurs, Identification of filamin as a novel ligand for caveolin-1: evidence for the organization of caveolin-1-associated membrane domains by the actin cytoskeleton. Mol Biol Cell, 2000. 11(1): p. 325-37. 110. Muriel, O., et al., Phosphorylated filamin A regulates actin-linked caveolae dynamics. J Cell Sci, 2011. 124(Pt 16): p. 2763-76. 111. Kanzaki, M. and J.E. Pessin, Caveolin-associated filamentous actin (Cav-actin) defines a novel F-actin structure in adipocytes. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2002. 277(29): p. 25867-25869. 112. Richter, T., et al., High‐resolution 3D quantitative analysis of caveolar ultrastructure and caveola–cytoskeleton interactions. Traffic, 2008. 9(6): p. 893-909. 113. Mundy, D.I., et al., Dual control of caveolar membrane traffic by microtubules and the actin cytoskeleton. Journal of Cell Science, 2002. 115(22): p. 4327-4339. 114. Stahlhut, M. and B.v. Deurs, Identification of filamin as a novel ligand for caveolin-1: evidence for the organization of caveolin-1–associated membrane domains by the actin cytoskeleton. Molecular biology of the cell, 2000. 11(1): p. 325-337. 115. Bennett, J.P., K.S. Zaner, and T.P. Stossel, Isolation and some properties of macrophage. alpha.-actinin: evidence that it is not an actin gelling protein. Biochemistry, 1984. 23(21): p. 5081-5086. 116. Ravid, D., et al., Filamin A is a novel caveolin-1-dependent target in IGF-I-stimulated cancer cell migration. Experimental cell research, 2008. 314(15): p. 2762-2773. 117. Muriel, O., et al., Phosphorylated filamin A regulates actin-linked caveolae dynamics. J Cell Sci, 2011. 124(16): p. 2763-2776. 118. Deschenes-Simard, X., et al., ERKs in cancer: Friends or foes? Cancer Research, 2014. 74(2): p. 412-419. 119. Adjei, A.A., et al., Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral, small-molecule mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886) in patients with advanced cancers. J Clin Oncol, 2008. 26(13): p. 2139-46. 120. Bekaii-Saab, T., et al., Multi-institutional phase II study of selumetinib in patients with metastatic biliary cancers. J Clin Oncol, 2011. 29(17): p. 2357-63. 121. Verkman, A.S., M.O. Anderson, and M.C. Papadopoulos, Aquaporins: important but elusive drug targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 2014. 13(4): p. 259-277. 122. Gomes, L.R., A.T. Vessoni, and C.F.M. Menck, Three-dimensional microenvironment confers enhanced sensitivity to doxorubicin by reducing p53-dependent induction of autophagy. Oncogene, 2015. 34: p. 5329-5340. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/60148 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 腫瘤微環境中表現的各種機械特性對癌細胞的轉移有很大的影響,轉移更是導致惡性腫瘤造成死亡的主要原因。例如、在腫瘤周圍的組織中,會存在各種細胞趨化因子的濃度梯度以及組織內直流電場(dcEF),這兩種不同的刺激可能同時出現在相同或相反的方向;因此,癌細胞會受到不同化學濃度梯度以及不同電場方向多種組合的影響。為了研究在相同和相反方向上排列的化學濃度梯度和dcEF如何影響人類肺癌細胞CL1-5的運動特性,我們建構了允許癌細胞暴露於dcEF和上皮生長因子(EGF)濃度梯度的微流道細胞培養晶片。我們發現CL1-5細胞受到直流電場的影響傾往正極方向移動。CL1-5細胞也受化學濃度梯度的影響向EGF濃度高的方向遷移。當CL1-5細胞受到直流電場和相反方向的EGF濃度梯度(0.5μM/ mm)的影響時,隨著電場增加至360mV / mm,CL1-5細胞的移動沒有固定的方向。當電場增加到大於540mV / mm時,電場的影響大於EGF濃度梯度的影響使得CL1-5傾向朝向直流電場正極的方向遷移。在這個微流道細胞培養晶片中我們也證明了兩種趨電性相反的肺癌細胞(CL1-5、A549)皆可以利用直流電場調控細胞的趨化性。
另一方面,組織間質液壓力(interstitial fluid pressure),不管在生理或是病理的過程中,都是很重要的生物指標。較高的組織間質液壓力是大部分腫瘤共同的特徵,但較高的壓力對癌細胞表現型造成的影響仍不清楚。在本篇論文中,我們發展出一套細胞培養系統,能對活體細胞模擬靜水壓力 0 到 20 毫米汞柱,去觀測細胞的行為表現,我們發現升高的靜水壓會導致肺癌細胞CL1-5和A549的移動速度、侵襲能力、細胞體積、絲狀偽足數目增加;從分子生物學的觀點來探討,升高的靜水壓導致細胞水通道蛋白(aquaporin-1)、 蝸牛蛋白(snail)、 黏著斑蛋白(vinculin)、 磷酸化的小窩蛋白(caveolin-1)、 磷酸化的细胞外調節蛋白激酶(p-Erk1/2)表現量增加。由先前的研究得知細胞的移動速度以及體積的增加與aquaporin表現量有關,所以當我們使用小干擾RNA(siRNA)轉染來抑制aquaporin-1時,原本受到靜水壓誘導使得移動速度增加的情況被抑制了;接著使用MEK蛋白激酶抑製劑(PD98059)抑制ERK1/2磷酸化,結果也抑制了水壓誘導aquaporin-1表現量上升以及移動速度上升的情形。最後透過siRNA轉染來抑制caveolin-1,因靜水壓誘導p-ERK1/2使得aquaporin-1表現量上升和移動速度增加的情形也都被抑制了。最後的結論為較高的組織間質液壓力主要是透過 caveolin-1的磷酸化誘導蛋白激酶B(Akt1/2k)的磷酸化進而活化Erk1/2,促使改變面積、絲狀偽足的數目和單隻細胞體積大小,因此可大幅增強肺癌細胞的侵襲力和移動能力。相比之下,正常支氣管上皮細胞在較高組織間質液壓力的環境下對上述的各種影響沒有明顯差異。我們的研究結果發現了一種新的分子路徑,證明了高組織間質液壓力與癌細胞的侵襲能力相關,有助於癌症治療的進步和發展。藉由細胞在體外微環境下運動行為以及表現型的研究,可獲知體內各種微環境條件調控癌細胞轉移的機制,對於癌症的治療,提供新的檢測平台以及臨床參考的知識。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The mechanical characteristics presented in cancer microenvironment have a pivot role in the cancer cell’s metastasis, which accounts for the leading cause of death from malignant tumors. For example, cancer cell migration is known to be driven by the concentration gradients of various cytokines and direct-current electric fields (dcEFs) coexisted in the cell’s microenvironment. To investigate how chemical gradients and the dcEFs that are aligned in the same and opposite directions affect the motility of the human lung cancer cells CL1-5, we built a microfluidic device that allowed the cancer cells to be exposed to both dcEFs and the concentration gradients of epithelial growth factor (EGF). We found that the CL1-5 cells tend to move to the anode when the dcEFs were applied, prefer to migrate against the concentration gradient of the EGF. When both the dcEFs and the EGF gradients were applied to the cells, the chemotactic movement of the CL1-5 cells driven by a EGF concentration gradient of 0.5M/mm was hindered by a contrary-aligned dcEF of 360mV/mm, and was overcame when the electric field was increased to more than 540mV/mm. We also demonstrated electrically modulated chemotaxis of the lung cancer cells A549 using electrotaxis in this device.
Besides, most solid tumors are characterized by high interstitial fluid pressure but whether the high pressure affects cancer cell motility remains unclear. In this regard, we found that the elevated hydrostatic pressures(HPs) increased the migration speeds, invasiveness, cell volume, filopodial number and aquaporin-1 (AQP1), Snail and vinculin expression levels, as well as phosphorylation of caveolin-1 and extracellular signal–regulated kinase1/2 (ERK1/2), in the lung cancer cells CL1-5 and A549. The increases of migration velocity and cell volume were associated with the increased AQP1 expression. When we used small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection to knockdown AQP1, the elevated HP-induced migration acceleration was hindered. Inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation using the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor PD98059 abrogated the elevated HP-induced AQP1 upregulation and migration acceleration in the cancer cells. Caveolin-1 knockdown by siRNA transfection attenuated the HP-induced, ERK1/2-depedent AQP1 upregulation and migration acceleration. Further biochemical studies revealed that the caveolin-1 activation-driven ERK1/2 signaling is mediated by Akt1/2 phosphorylation. By contrast, the elevated HPs had negligible effects on the migration speed and volume of normal bronchial epithelial cells. Our results disclose a novel pathway relating high IFP to the invasiveness of cancer cells and highlight potential targets to hinder cancer cells spreading. Collectively, these novel findings of the motility and phenotype of the lung cancer cells subject to in vitro microenvironments recapitulating the complex conditions in vivo should shed light in the understanding of cancer cell metastasis and provide a new testing platform and knowledge useful for clinical applications. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:59:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-D00945010-1.pdf: 6705559 bytes, checksum: d132033401a0e90f06e2cf56efc7328a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 Ⅰ
誌謝 Ⅱ ABSTRACT Ⅳ 中文摘要 Ⅵ TABLE OF CONTENTS Ⅷ LIST OF FIGURES ⅩⅠⅠ LIST OF CHART ⅩⅤⅠⅠⅠ Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1-1 Cancer Metastasis 2 1-2 Cell migration 3 1-3 Chemotaxis 5 1-4 Mechanotaxis 7 1-4.1 Shear stress 8 1-4.2 Substrate stiffness gradient (durotaxis) 11 1-4.3 Pressure 15 1-4.4 Electric field (Electrotaxis) 17 1-5 Microfluidic cell culture devices 20 1-6 Aims 22 1-7 Modulating chemotaxis of cancer cells by using direct-current electric fields in a microfluidic chip 23 1-8 Elevated hydrostatic pressure enhances the motility and enlarges the size of the lung cancer cells through aquaporin upregulation mediated by caveolin-1 and ERK1/2 signaling 26 Chapter 2. Modulating chemotaxis of cancer cells by using Direct-current electric fields in a microfluidic chip 28 2-1 Materials and Methods 28 2-1.1 Cell preparation 28 2-1.2 Microfluidic device preparation 29 2-1.3 Simulation 32 2-1.4 Measurement 35 2-1.5 Data analysis 37 2-2 Results and Discussion 38 2-2.1 Chemotaxis of CL1-5 cell under EGF Concentration Gradients 38 2-2.2 Electrotaxis of CL1-5 cell under dcEF 40 2-2.3 Co-existing under chemical gradient and dcEF 43 2-2.4 Modulating chemotaxis of cancer cell(CL1-5&A549) by using dcEF 46 2-3 Conclusion 49 Chapter 3. Elevated hydrostatic pressure enhances the motility and enlarges the size of lung cancer cells through aquaporin up-regulation mediated by caveolin-1 and ERK1/2 signaling 50 3-1 Introduction 50 3-1.1 Caveolin-1… 51 3-1.2 Aquaporins 52 3-1.3 ERK1/2 53 3-2 Materials and Method 53 3-2.1 Cell-culturing devices 53 3-2.2 Cell culture 55 3-2.3 Cell migration tracking 56 3-2.4 Quantitative immunocytochemistry 56 3-2.5 Cell volume measurement 57 3-2.6 Cell invasion assay 59 3-2.7 Western blotting analysis 60 3-2.8 MAPK kinase inhibitor and Akt1/2 inhibitor 62 3-2.9 siRNA for Caveolin-1 and AQP1 knockdown 62 3-2.10 Statistical analysis 62 3-3 Result 62 3-3.1 HP increases the migration speed, volume and invasiveness of the lung cancer cells 63 3-3.2 HP increases AQP1-dependent migration in the lung cancer cells 72 3-3.3 Hydrostatic pressure increases caveolin-1 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation 75 3-3.4 Inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation suppresses the elevated HP-induced changes in cell motility and volume 79 3-3.5 Inhibition of Akt1/2 phosphorylation represses the elevated HP-induced ERK1/2 signaling 81 3-3.6 Caveolin-1 knockdown abolished the elevated HP-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation and migration acceleration 83 3-4 Conclusion 85 Chapter 4 Dicussion 86 4-1 Modulating chemotaxis of cancer cells by using Direct-current electric fields in a microfluidic chip 86 4-2 Elevated hydrostatic pressure enhances the motility and enlarges the size of lung cancer cells through aquaporin up-regulation mediated by caveolin-1 and ERK1/2 signaling 87 Reference 92 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 電場及壓力等物理性刺激對肺癌細胞表現型的影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effects of Electrical and Pressure Stimulations on the
Phenotype of The Lung Cancer Cells | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 李超煌(Chau-Hwang Lee) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 趙本秀(Pen-hsiu Grace Chao),黃念祖(Nien-Tsu Huang),陳淑靜(Shu-Ching Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 趨化性,趨電性,微流道細胞培養裝置,靜水壓,小窩蛋白,水通道蛋白,?胞外調節蛋白激?, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Chemotaxis,Electrotaxis,Microfluidic cell culture device,Hydrostatic pressure,Caveolin,Aquaporins,ERK1/2, | en |
dc.relation.page | 100 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201603770 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-11-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 電機資訊學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生醫電子與資訊學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生醫電子與資訊學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.55 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。