請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59868完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李雅玲(Ya-Ling Lee) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Su-Hui Tsai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡素蕙 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:42:13Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-03-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-03-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-02-06 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王紹穎（2007）•自我感、復原力與創傷後症狀之關聯性研究：以燒傷病人為例•未發表碩士論文•台北：臺灣大學心理學研究所。
林秋菊（2014）•量表的建構與測試•高雄護理雜誌，31（2），12-21。 李雅玲、高碧霞、曾紀瑩、駱麗華（2000）•癌症兒童主要照顧者所關注的居家健康照護需求•護理研究，8（6），673-684。 吳淑芳（2006）•國外量表之兩階段翻譯及信效度測試•護理雜誌，53（1），65-71。 邱皓政（2012）•量化研究法•臺北市：雙葉書廊。 姚開屏（2005）•台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊•台北世界衛生組織生活品質問卷台灣版發展小組，台大心理系。 徐獻洲、黃美智（2011）•文化適切性照護-協助一位新移民母親之癌症學童返回校園•護理雜誌，58(3)，85-89。 許雅茹（2012）•急性淋巴性白血病兒童主要照顧者復原能力之相關性研究•未發表碩士論文•台中：中國醫藥大學護理學系研究所。 黃美智（2003）•正常化-慢性疾病兒童之家庭處理型態•護理雜誌，50（2），61-65。 衛生福利部國民健康署（2016）•民國96-101年癌症發生率(年齡別)．取自https://cris.hpa.gov.tw/pagepub/Home.aspx?itemNo=cr.s.10 劉影梅、黃璉華（2001）•既有量表的評價及運用•護理雜誌，48（3），95-101。 盧美秀、林秋芬（2006）•護理研究倫理的考量•源遠護理，1（1），30-36。 Aagaard, H., & Hall, E. O. (2008). Mothers’ experiences of having a preterm infant in the neonatal care unit: A meta-synthesis. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 23(3), 26-36. Anderson, J. M. (1986). Ethnicity and illness experience: Ideological structures and the health care delivery system. Social Science and Medicine, 22, 1277-1283. Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing and Consumer Research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161. Bentler, P. M. (1982). Confirmatory factor analysis via noniterative estimation: A fast, inexpensive method. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 417-424. Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17(3), 303–316. Bona, K., Dussel, V., Orellana, L., Kang, T., Geyer, R., Feudtner, C., & Wolfe, J. (2014). Economic impact of advanced pediatric cancer on families. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 47(3), 594-603. Byrne B. M. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, 2nd Edn Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. Chenard, C. (2007). The impact of stigma on the self-care behaviors of HIV-positive gay men striving for normalcy. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 18(3), 23-32. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 233-255. Cohen, J.(1988)The Analysis of variance, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Creswell, P. D., Wisk, L. E., Litzelman, K., Allchin, A., & Witt, W. P. (2014). Parental depressive symptoms and childhood cancer: The importance of financial difficulties. Supportive Care in Cancer, 22(2), 503-511. Darcy, L., Knutsson, S., Huus, K., & Enskär, K. (2014). The everyday life of the young child shortly after receiving a cancer diagnosis, from both children’s and parents perspectives. Cancer Nursing, 37(6), 445-456. Davis, F. (1961). Deviance disavowal: The management of strained interaction by the visibly handicapped. Social Problems, 9, 120-132. Darcy, L., Björk, M., Enskär, K., & Knutsson, S. (2014). The process of striving for an ordinary, everyday life, in young children living with cancer, at six months and one year post diagnosis. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 18(6), 605-612. Deatrick, J. A., Knafl, K. A., & Murphy-Moore, C. (1999). Clarifying the concept of normalization. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 31, 209-214. DeVellis, R. F., & Dancer, L. S. (1991). Scale development: Theory and Applications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(1), 79-82. Devon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy S. M., & Kostas‐Polston, E. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 155-164. Doll, W.J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 18(4), 357–369. Earle, E. A., Clarke, S. A., Eiser, C., & Sheppard, L. (2007). ‘Building a new normality’: Mothers’ experiences of caring for a child with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33(2), 155-160. Emiliani, F., Bertocchi, S., Potì, S., & Palareti, L. (2011). Process of normalization in families with children affected by hemophilia. Qualitative Health Research, 21(12), 1667-1678. Engelen, V., van Zwieten, M., Koopman, H., Detmar, S., Caron, H., Brons, P., Egeler, M., Kaspers, G. J., & Grootenhuis, M. (2012). The influence of patient reported outcomes on the discussion of psychosocial issues in children with cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 59(1), 161-166. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 39-50. Friborg, O., Hjemdal, O., Rosenvinge, J. H., Martinussen, M., Aslaksen, P. M., & Flaten, M. A. (2006). Resilience as a moderator of pain and stress. Journal of psychosomatic research, 61(2), 213-219. Gallagher, P., Desmond, D., & MacLachlan, M. (2008). Psychoprosthetics. London, England: Springer. Gantt, L. (2002). As normal a life as possible: Mothers and their daughters with congenital heart disease. Health Care for Women International, 23(5), 481-491. Gallacher, K., May, C. R., Montori, V. M., & Mair, F. S. (2011). Understanding patients’ experiences of treatment burden in chronic heart failure using normalization process theory. The Annals of Family Medicine, 9(3), 235-243. Hetherington, E. M., & Blechman, E. A. (2014). Stress, coping, and resiliency in children and families. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Hoberman, A., Shaikh, N., Bhatnagar, S., Haralam, M. A., Kearney, D. H., Colborn, D. K., Kienholz, M. L., Wang, L., Bunker, C. H., Keren, R., Carpenter, M. A., Greenfield, S. P., Pohl, H. G., Mathews, R., Moxy-Mims, M., & Chesney, R. W. (2013). Factors that influence parental decisions to participate in clinical research: Consenters vs nonconsenters. The Journal of the American Medical Association pediatrics, 167(6), 561-566. Hoehn, J., Foxen-Craft, E., Pinder, W., & Dahlquist, L. M. (2016). The role of parents in promoting children’s adjustment to chronic illness. In C. DeMichelis & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Child and Adolescent Resilience Within Medical Contexts (pp. 105-119). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. Holaday, B., Wang, R. H., Ma, F. C., Ma, T. L., & Bossert, E. (1990). Chronic illness and the family: A review of sources of stress. Journal of Medical Sciences, 11(3), 175-184. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). “Structural Equation Modeling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit”. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: A multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. Hung, G. Y., Horng, J. L., Lee, Y. S., Yen, H. J., Chen, C. C., & Lee, C. Y. (2014). Cancer incidence patterns among children and adolescents in Taiwan from 1995 to 2009: A population‐based study. Cancer, 120(22), 3545-3553. Jones, B. L. (2012). The challenge of quality care for family caregivers in pediatric cancer care. Seminars in oncology nursing , 28(4), 213-220. Jones, P. S., Lee, J. W., Phillips, L. R., Zhang, X. E., & Jaceldo, K. B. (2001). An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research. Nursing Research, 50(5), 300-304. Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2012). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues(8th ed). Boston: Cengage Learning. Kawamura, J. S. (2016). Indirect Effects of Parental Coping on Children’s Psychosocial Adjustment in the Context of Pediatric Cancer (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington). Kearney, J. A., Salley, C. G., & Muriel, A. C. (2015). Standards of psychosocial care for parents of children with cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 62(5), 632-683. Kline, P. (2013). Handbook of psychological testing. London, England: Routledge. Knafl, K. A., & Deatrick, J. A. (1986). How families manage chronic conditions: An analysis of the concept of normalization. Research in Nursing and Health, 9, 215-222. Knafl, K. A., Deatrick, J. A., & Havill, N. L. (2012). Continued development of the family management style framework. Journal of Family Nursing, 18(1), 11-34. Knafl, K. A., Deatrick, J. A., Knafl, G. J., Gallo, A. M., Grey, M., & Dixon, J. (2013). Patterns of family management of childhood chronic conditions and their relationship to child and family functioning. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 28(6), 523-535. Koch, L., Jansen, L., Brenner, H., & Arndt, V. (2013). Fear of recurrence and disease progression in long‐term (≥ 5 years) cancer survivors—a systematic review of quantitative studies. Psycho‐Oncology, 22(1), 1-11. Lambert, V., & Keogh, D. (2015). Striving to live a normal life: A review of children and young people’s experience of feeling different when living with a long term condition. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 30(1), 63-77. Lau, S., Lu, X., Balsamo, L., Devidas, M., Winick, N., Hunger, S. P., Carroll, W., Stork, L., & Kadan‐Lottick, N. (2014). Family life events in the first year of acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy: A children’s oncology group report. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 61(12), 2277-2284. Liu, Y. L., Lo, W. C., Chiang, C. J., Yang, Y. W., Lu, M. Y., Hsu, W. M., Ho, W. L., Li, M. J., Miser, J. S., Lin, D. T., & Lai, M. S. (2015). Incidence of cancer in children aged 0–14 years in Taiwan, 1996–2010. Cancer Epidemiology, 39(1), 21-28. Long, K. A., & Marsland, A. L. (2011). Family adjustment to childhood cancer: A systematic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 14(1), 57-88. Mallinson, R. K., Relf, M. V., Dekker, D., Dolan, K., Darcy, A., & Ford, A. (2005). Maintaining normalcy: A grounded theory of engaging in HIV‐oriented primary medical care. Advances in Nursing Science, 28(3), 265-277. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological methods, 7(1), 64-82. McGahee, T. W., & Ball, J. (2009). How to read and really use an item analysis. Nurse Educator, 34(4), 166-171. Mulaik, S.A., James, L.R., Van Alstine, J., Bennet, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C.D. (1989). Evaluation of Goodness-of-Fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105 (3), 430-445. O’Neal, C. A. S. (2007). The development of the normalization assessment measure (Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University). Peek, G., & Melnyk, B. M. (2010). Coping interventions for parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer: An evidence review with implications for clinical practice and future research. Pediatric Nursing, 36(6), 306-313. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), 489-497. Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 30(4), 459-467. Protudjer, J. L., Kozyrskyj, A. L., Becker, A. B., & Marchessault, G. (2009). Normalization strategies of children with asthma. Qualitative Health Research, 19(1), 94-104. Rempel, G. R., Harrison, M. J., & Williamson, D. L. (2009). Is “Treat your child normally” helpful advice for parents of survivors of treatment of hypoplastic left heart syndrome? Cardiology in the Young, 19(2), 135-144. Robinson, K. E., Gerhardt, C. A., Vannatta, K., & Noll, R. B. (2007). Parent and family factors associated with child adjustment to pediatric cancer. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32(4), 400-410. Salvador, A., Crespo, C., Martins, A. R., Santos, S., & Canavarro, M. C. (2015). Parents’ perceptions about their child’s illness in pediatric cancer: Links with caregiving burden and quality of life. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(4), 1129-114. Schwartz, C. (1957). Perspectives on deviance-wives’ definitions of their husbands’ mental illness. Psychiatry, 20, 275-291. Semple, C. J., & McCance, T. (2010). Parents’ experience of cancer who have young children: A literature review. Cancer Nursing, 33(2), 110-118. Sultan, S., Leclair, T., Rondeau, E., Burns, W., & Abate, C. (2015). A systematic review on factors and consequences of parental distress as related to childhood cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care, 25, 616-637. Squires, A., Aiken, L. H., van den Heede, K., Sermeus, W., Bruyneel, L., Lindqvist, R., Schoonoven, L., Stromseng, I., Busse, R., & Ensio, A. (2013). A systematic survey instrument translation process for multi-country, comparative health workforce studies. International journal of nursing studies, 50(2), 264-273. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon. Toly, V. B., Musil, C. M., & Carl, J. C. (2012). Families with children who are technology dependent normalization and family functioning. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 34(1), 52-71. Warner, E. L., Kirchhoff, A. C., Nam, G. E., & Fluchel, M. (2014). Financial burden of pediatric cancer for patients and their families. Journal of Oncology Practice, 11(1), 12-18. West, C. H., Bell, J. M., Woodgate, R. L., & Moules, N. J. (2015). Waiting to return to normal: An exploration of family systems intervention in childhood cancer. Journal of Family Nursing, 21(2), 261-294. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological methodology, 8(1), 84-136. Winkler, M. F., & Smith, C. E. (2015). The impact of long-term home parenteral nutrition on the patient and the family. Journal of Infusion Nursing, 38(4), 290-300. Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79-94. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59868 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 研究背景：
隨著醫療環境及品質的提升，疾病的存活率及平均餘命增加，導致慢性疾病病患人數逐年遞增。這些長期需要與疾病共處的慢性疾病患者，為了降低疾病或治療所帶來的不良效應，或渴望回歸正常的生活型態，即為「正常化」。國內尚未有以正常化觀點探討慢性疾病病患在因應疾病的過程，因此希望藉由中文版正常化量表的發展，未來可用於檢視台灣慢性疾病病患罹病後的正常化情形。 研究目的： 本研究目的係將O’Neal於2007年發展的正常化量表，經修訂及翻譯成中文之後測試在台灣的適用性並檢測其信效度。具體目標有三：1.發展中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表， 2.建立中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表的心理計量，及3.瞭解台灣癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化的情形。 研究方法： 本研究中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表是經過雙向翻譯及專家內容效度檢定後，以結構式問卷施測於癌症兒童的主要照顧者。研究者於北部某醫學中心兒童癌症病房及門診間採立意取樣的方式進行收案，共收得241位受訪者。經內在一致性信度、專家內容效度、建構效度、效標關聯效度，檢定此量表的心理計量。 研究結果： 本研究量表的內在一致性信度Cronbach’s α值為0.91。效度方面，建構效度經探索式因素分析法，萃取出單一因素。經驗證式因素分析法驗證本量表的假設模型，經模組修飾後其適配指標GFI、AGFI、CFI、IFI、PGFI、PNFI、RMSEA、RMR、χ2/df均可達到閾值，可見本量表模組於統計上具有足夠的解釋力，平均變異萃取量為0.537。中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表和「台灣簡明版生活品質量表」、「中文版成人復原力量表」進行相關性分析，其相關係數分別為0.475、0.372，可見本量表具有良好的效標關聯效度。經三位專家進行兩次的專家內容效度檢測，CVI值分別為0.88、0.99。由此可知本研究量表具有良好的信效度。 研究結果發現「治療年距」、「癌童疾病治療階段」、「家庭開銷是否需要他人補助」為影響癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化的主要變項。另外本量表和「台灣簡明版生活品質量表」各範疇均呈中度正相關，相關係數介於0.375-0.436 (p<.01)。和中文版成人復原力量表各範疇呈低至中度正相關，相關係數介於0.253-0.352 (p<.01)。 結論與應用： 本研究所發展的中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表具有良好的信效度。建議將此概念運用於臨床護理實務、教育及研究上，從測量的量化結果協助促進慢性疾病病患或其照顧者及早建立正常的生活型態，拓展此概念的發展和應用。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: The quality of medical treatment is improving, the survival rate of diseases and average of ages are extended, and many people will coexist with their diseases. The definition of normalization is that these people with chronic disease will want to return to their normal life in order to reduce the distress of life. But in our country, it hasn’t explored the patient who cope with chronic disease used the concept of normalization. This research is conducted to develop the Chinese version of normalization assessment measure to examine the phenomenon of these patient coping chronic diseases in normalization.
Objective: The aims of this research have threefold. First, is to translate and revise the “Normalization Assessment Measure” developed by Dr. O’Neal in 2007 into Chinese version. Second, is to establish its reliability and validity. And third, is to understand the phenomenon of normalization of caregivers of cancer children. Methods: The Chinese version of Normalization Measure Assessment in caregiver of cancer children (NAM-CCC) had been double-translated. We survey a sample of 241 the caregivers of cancer children who treated at the medical center in North of Taiwan. Results: The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the NAM-CCC is 0.91. The construct validity is analyzed by exploratory factor analysis, and one factor is extracted. And these items are analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis, all adaptation indexes included GFI、AGFI、CFI、IFI、PGFI、PNFI、RMSEA、RMR、χ2/df, show that the structural model of NAM-CCC has explanatory power on statics. And the Average Variance Extracted of NAM-CCC is 0.537. The Pearson’s correlation with “Taiwan version of WHOQOL-BREF” and ”Chinese version of Resilience Scale for Adult” are 0.475、 0.372(p<0.01). The results show that the NAM-CCC consisted of good criterion-related validity. This research had invited three experts to review NAM-CCC twice. The result of the first content validity is 0.88, and the second is 0.99. The results show that “The years of treatment”、“The stage of treatment for the cancer children” and “Do family need financial support?” are the main variables influenced the normalization on the caregivers of cancer children. NAM-CCC is moderately positive associated with these domains of “Taiwan version of WHOQOL-BREF” (r=.375-.436, p<.01). NAM-CCC is mildly to moderately positive associated with these domains of “Chinese version of Resilience Scale for Adult” (r=.253-.352, p<.01) Discussion and Conclusion: The results indicate that the NAM-CCC consists of good reliability and validity. The instrument can be used for measure normalization in caregivers of cancer children. And it will help us to understand what these people need to enhance them build the normal life. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:42:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R02426024-1.pdf: 2526032 bytes, checksum: 427b01385f5acc5475e60e3b19d9d8b7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄 頁碼
中文摘要........................................I 英文摘要......................................III 目錄...........................................V 圖目次.......................................VIII 表目次.........................................IX 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景與動機.............................1 第二節 研究目的..................................3 第三節 研究問題..................................5 第四節 研究假設..................................6 第五節 名詞定義..................................7 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 正常化概念發展............................8 第二節 正常化相關研究現況. ......................10 第三節 正常化量表發展及信效度....................14 第四節 譯版量表發展及其心理計量建構...............16 第五節 癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化...................20 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究設計.................................22 第二節 研究對象.................................25 第三節 研究工具.................................26 第四節 資料收集步驟.............................28 第五節 研究倫理考量.............................29 第六節 資料處理方法.............................30 第四章 研究結果 第一節 研究對象之基本人口學特質與癌童疾病特性...32 第二節 量表題項相關矩陣和項目分析..............37 第三節 效度分析.............................40 第四節 信度分析.............................49 第五節 癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化之影響因素與預測因子分析..50 第六節 癌症兒童主要照顧者生活品質及復原力和其正常化的相關...53 第五章 討論 第一節 中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表之翻譯過程......57 第二節 中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表之信效度........60 第三節 中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表與原量表比較....63 第四節 影響癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化之顯著變項......65 第六章 結論與建議 第一節 結論.......................................67 第二節 研究限制與建議...............................69 第三節 應用與建議....................................70 第七章 參考文獻..........................................71 附錄 附件一 Normalization Assessment Measure原始版本.........80 附件二 Normalization Assessment Measure癌童主要照顧者版本...81 附件三 專家內容效度諮詢專家名單...................82 附件四 專家內容效度評量表.................................83 附件五 專家內容效度鑑定結果及修改建議.....................87 附件六 研究結構式量表................................90 附件七 臨床研究同意書.................................95 附件八 正常化量表使用同意函.........................99 附件九 中文版成人復原力量表使用同意函......................100 圖目次 圖一 探討影響癌童主要照顧者正常化的相關因素之研究架構圖.......4 圖二 量表發展與測試流程................................24 圖三 研究對象招募流程.....................................33 圖四 中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表之陡坡檢定............41 圖五 中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表之驗證性因素分析模組..47 表目次 表一 正常化相關研究文獻...................................10 表二 研究對象人口學屬性...................................34 表三 研究對象其癌症孩童基本人口學及疾病特性資料..............36 表四 中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表題項之相關矩陣........38 表五 中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表之項目分析............39 表六 中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表之因子負荷量表........42 表七 中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表之驗證性因素分析結果....46 表八 人口學特質、癌童疾病特性與主要照顧者正常化之t檢定與變異數分析......................................................52 表九 人口學特質、癌童疾病特性與主要照顧者正常化之逐步迴歸分析..45 表十 台灣簡明版生活品質問卷(WHOQOL-BREF)各範疇得分情形......55 表十一 中文版成人復原力量表(RSA)各範疇得分情形..............55 表十二 NAM-CCC和WHOQOL-BREF各範疇之相關.................56 表十三 NAM-CCC和RSA各範疇之相關............................56 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 效度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 正常化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 癌症兒童 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 主要照顧者 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 量表 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 信度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Caregiver | en |
| dc.subject | Normalization | en |
| dc.subject | Validity | en |
| dc.subject | Reliability | en |
| dc.subject | Cancer children | en |
| dc.subject | Instrument | en |
| dc.title | 中文版癌症兒童主要照顧者正常化量表之信效度研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Normalization Assessment Measure in Caregivers of Cancer Children | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭夙芬(Su-Fen Cheng),張念慈(Nien-Tzu Chang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 正常化,癌症兒童,主要照顧者,量表,信度,效度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Normalization,Cancer children,Caregiver,Instrument,Reliability,Validity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 100 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201700342 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-02-06 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 護理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 護理學系所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-106-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.47 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。