請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59819
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 武敬和 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Lin Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張加霖 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:39:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-16 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-02-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-02-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] Ghoussayni S, Stevens C, Durham S, et al: Assessment and validation of a simple automated method for the detection of gait events and intervals. Gait & Posture 2004;20:266-272.
[2] Whittle MW: Gait analysis: an introduction: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2014. [3] Pope MH, Bevins T, Wilder DG, et al: The Relationship between Anthropometric, Postural, Muscular, and Mobility Characteristics of Males Ages 18-55. Spine 1985;10:644-648. [4] Steultjens MP, Dekker J, van Baar ME, et al: Range of joint motion and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000;39:955-961. [5] Kimmeskamp S, Hennig EM: Heel to toe motion characteristics in Parkinson patients during free walking. Clinical Biomechanics 2001;16:806-812. [6] Moore ST, MacDougall HG, Ondo WG: Ambulatory monitoring of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2008;167:340-348. [7] Turcot K, Aissaoui R, Boivin K, et al: New accelerometric method to discriminate between asymptomatic subjects and patients with medial knee osteoarthritis during 3-D gait. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2008;55:1415-1422. [8] Linley HS, Sled EA, Culham EG, et al: A biomechanical analysis of trunk and pelvis motion during gait in subjects with knee osteoarthritis compared to control subjects. Clinical Biomechanics 2010;25:1003-1010. [9] Watanabe K, Hokari M: Kinematical analysis and measurement of sports form. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part a-Systems and Humans 2006;36:549- 557. [10] Kwon DY, Gross M: Combining body sensors and visual sensors for motion training, Proceedings, Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology, Valencia, Spain, 2005 (available from ACM). [11] Boulgouris NV, Hatzinakos D, Plataniotis KN: Gait recognition: A challenging signal processing technology for biometric identification. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2005;22:78-90. [12] Wahab Y, Bakar NA: Gait analysis measurement for sport application based on ultrasonic system, Proceedings, 2011 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Consumer Electronics, 14-17 June 2011, 2011 (available from IEEE). [13] Windolf M, Gotzen N, Morlock M: Systematic accuracy and precision analysis of video motion capturing systems--exemplified on the Vicon-460 system. Journal of Biomechanics 2008;41:2776-2780. [14] Cappozzo A, Catani F, Leardini A, et al: Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. Clinical Biomechanics 1996;11:90-100. [15] Tsai TY, Lu TW, Kuo MY, et al: Quantification of Three-Dimensional Movement of Skin Markers Relative to the Underlying Bones during Functional Activities. Biomedical Engineering-Applications Basis Communications 2009;21:223-232. [16] Bismuth C, Gerin C, Viguier E, et al: The biomechanical properties of canine skin measured in situ by uniaxial extension. Journal of Biomechanics 2014;47:1067-1073. [17] Nussbaum MC: The Text of Aristotle's De Motu Animalium. Harvard studies in classical philology 1976;80:111-159. [18] Baker R: The history of gait analysis before the advent of modern computers. Gait Posture 2007;26:331-342. [19] Borelli GA, Bernoulli J, Elinger N, et al: De motu animalium: Apud Petrum Gosse; 1743. [20] Muybridge E: Animal Locomotion: An Electrophotographic Investigation of Consecutive Phases of Animal Movements: University of Pennsylvania; 1887. [21] Andriacchi TP, Alexander EJ: Studies of human locomotion: past, present and future. Journal of Biomechanics 2000;33:1217-1224. [22] Fischer O, Braune CW: Der gang des menschen: BG Teubner; 1899. [23] University of California BPDRP: Subcontractor's Report on Fundamental Studies of Human Locomotion and Other Information Relating to Design of Artificial Limbs: Covering the Period from September 1945 Through June 1947: Berkeley, Cal; 1947. [24] Inman VT, Ralston HJ, Todd F: Human walking: Williams & Wilkins; 1981. [25] Peters A, Galna B, Sangeux M, et al: Quantification of soft tissue artifact in lower limb human motion analysis: a systematic review. Gait Posture 2010;31:1-8. [26] Lu TW, Chang CF: Biomechanics of human movement and its clinical applications. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2012;28:S13-25. [27] Muro-de-la-Herran A, Garcia-Zapirain B, Mendez-Zorrilla A: Gait analysis methods: an overview of wearable and non-wearable systems, highlighting clinical applications. Sensors 2014;14:3362-3394. [28] Roetenberg D: Inertial and magnetic sensing of human motion. University of Twente; 2006. [29] Richards J: Biomechanics in Clinic and Research: An Interactive Teaching and Learning Course: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2008. [30] Hansson GA, Asterland P, Kellerman M: Modular data logger system for physical workload measurements. Ergonomics 2003;46:407-415. [31] Begg R, Palaniswami M: Computational Intelligence for Movement Sciences: Neural Networks and Other Emerging Techniques: Idea Group Pub.; 2006. [32] Carnaz L, Oliveira AB, Sato TO, et al: Effects of sensor, trials and knee joint variables on electrogoniometric gait recordings. Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia 2008;12:460-467. [33] Kaajakari V: Practical MEMS: Design of microsystems, accelerometers, gyroscopes, RF MEMS, optical MEMS, and microfluidic systems. Las Vegas, NV: Small Gear Publishing 2009. [34] Aszkler C: CHAPTER 5 - Acceleration, Shock and Vibration Sensors, in Sensor Technology Handbook. Burlington: Newnes; 2005:137-159. [35] Luinge HJ: Inertial sensing of human movement: Twente University Press; 2002. [36] Medved V: Measurement of human locomotion: CRC press; 2000. [37] Zhang Z, Panousopoulou A, Yang G-Z: Wearable Sensor Integration and Bio-motion Capture: A Practical Perspective, in Yang G-Z (ed): Body Sensor Networks. London: Springer London; 2014:495-526. [38] Jungwon Y, Novandy B, Chul-Ho Y, et al: A 6-DOF Gait Rehabilitation Robot With Upper and Lower Limb Connections That Allows Walking Velocity Updates on Various Terrains. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 2010;15:201-215. [39] Schabowsky CN, Godfrey SB, Holley RJ, et al: Development and pilot testing of HEXORR: Hand EXOskeleton Rehabilitation Robot. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 2010;7. [40] Morris R, Lawson S: A review and evaluation of available gait analysis technologies, and their potential for the measurement of impact transmission. Newcastle University 2010. [41] Goffredo M, Seely RD, Carter JN, et al: Markerless view independent gait analysis with self-camera calibration, Proceedings, Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition, 2008. FG'08. 8th IEEE International Conference on, 2008 (available from IEEE). [42] Lee L, Grimson WEL: Gait analysis for recognition and classification, Proceedings, Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2002. Proceedings. Fifth IEEE International Conference on, 2002 (available from IEEE). [43] Rosenhahn B, Klette R, Metaxas D: Human Motion: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2007. [44] Benoit DL, Ramsey DK, Lamontagne M, et al: Effect of skin movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and cutting motions measured in vivo. Gait & Posture 2006;24:152-164. [45] Abdel-Aziz YI, Karara HM: Direct Linear Transformation from Comparator Coordinates into Object Space Coordinates in Close-Range Photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 2015;81:103-107. [46] Park SW, Park HS, Kim JH, et al: 3D displacement measurement model for health monitoring of structures using a motion capture system. Measurement 2015;59:352-362. [47] Chen P-Y: Measurement of Soft Tissue Artifacts in Human Motion Analysis. Master: National Taiwan University; 2008. [48] Chiari L, Della Croce U, Leardini A, et al: Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 2: instrumental errors. Gait & Posture 2005;21:197-211. [49] Della Croce U, Leardini A, Chiari L, et al: Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics. Gait & Posture 2005;21:226-237. [50] Tsai T-Y: Development of a 3D Fluoroscopy Method and its Integration with Stereophotogrammetry to Study the Effects of Soft Tissue Artifacts on the Calculated Mechanical Variables of the Knee During Functional Activities. Ph.D: National Taiwan University; 2010. [51] Lin CC, Lu TW, Lu HL, et al: Effects of soft tissue artifacts on differentiating kinematic differences between natural and replaced knee joints during functional activity. Gait & Posture 2016;46:154-160. [52] Leardini A, Chiari L, Della Croce U, et al: Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry - Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. Gait & Posture 2005;21:212-225. [53] Tsai TY, Lu TW, Kuo MY, et al: Effects of soft tissue artifacts on the calculated kinematics and kinetics of the knee during stair-ascent. Journal of Biomechanics 2011;44:1182-1188. [54] Barre A, Thiran JP, Jolles BM, et al: Soft tissue artifact assessment during treadmill walking in subjects with total knee arthroplasty. IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine 2013;60:3131-3140. [55] Fuller J, Liu LJ, Murphy MC, et al: A comparison of lower-extremity skeletal kinematics measured using skin- and pin-mounted markers. Human Movement Science 1997;16:219- 242. [56] Reinschmidt C, van den Bogert AJ, Nigg BM, et al: Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. Journal of Biomechanics 1997;30:729-732. [57] Andriacchi TP, Alexander EJ, Toney MK, et al: A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: applied to a study of knee kinematics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1998;120:743-749. [58] Andersen MS, Benoit DL, Damsgaard M, et al: Do kinematic models reduce the effects of soft tissue artefacts in skin marker-based motion analysis? An in vivo study of knee kinematics. Journal of Biomechanics 2010;43:268-273. [59] Holden JP, Orsini JA, Siegel KL, et al: Surface movement errors in shank kinematics and knee kinetics during gait. Gait & Posture 1997;5:217-227. [60] Manal K, McClay I, Richards J, et al: Knee moment profiles during walking: errors due to soft tissue movement of the shank and the influence of the reference coordinate system. Gait & Posture 2002;15:10-17. [61] Manal K, Davis IM, Galinat B, et al: The accuracy of estimating proximal tibial translation during natural cadence walking: bone vs. skin mounted targets. Clinical Biomechanics 2003;18:126-131. [62] Alexander EJ, Andriacchi TP: Correcting for deformation in skin-based marker systems. Journal of Biomechanics 2001;34:355-361. [63] Tashman S, Anderst W: Skin motion artifacts at the knee during impact movements. Gait Posture 2002;16:11-12. [64] Dennis DA, Mahfouz MR, Komistek RD, et al: In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics. Journal of Biomechanics 2005;38:241-253. [65] Sangeux M, Marin F, Charleux F, et al: Quantification of the 3D relative movement of external marker sets vs. bones based on magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical Biomechanics 2006;21:984-991. [66] Akbarshahi M, Schache AG, Fernandez JW, et al: Non-invasive assessment of soft-tissue artifact and its effect on knee joint kinematics during functional activity. Journal of Biomechanics 2010;43:1292-1301. [67] Cappello A, Stagni R, Fantozzi S, et al: Soft tissue artifact compensation in knee kinematics by double anatomical landmark calibration: performance of a novel method during selected motor tasks. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2005;52:992- 998. [68] Stagni R, Fantozzi S, Cappello A, et al: Quantification of soft tissue artefact in motion analysis by combining 3D fluoroscopy and stereophotogrammetry: a study on two subjects. Clinical Biomechanics 2005;20:320-329. [69] Garling EH, Kaptein BL, Mertens B, et al: Soft-tissue artefact assessment during step-up using fluoroscopy and skin-mounted markers. Journal of Biomechanics 2007;40 Suppl 1:S18-24. [70] Kuo MY, Tsai TY, Lin CC, et al: Influence of soft tissue artifacts on the calculated kinematics and kinetics of total knee replacements during sit-to-stand. Gait & Posture 2011;33:379-384. [71] Houck J, Yack HJ, Cuddeford T: Validity and comparisons of tibiofemoral orientations and displacement using a femoral tracking device during early to mid stance of walking. Gait & Posture 2004;19:76-84. [72] Karrholm J: Roentgen stereophotogrammetry: Review of orthopedic applications. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1989;60:491-503. [73] Tranberg R, Karlsson D: The relative skin movement of the foot: a 2-D roentgen photogrammetry study. Clinical Biomechanics 1998;13:71-76. [74] Maslen BA, Ackland TR: Radiographic study of skin displacement errors in the foot and ankle during standing. Clinical Biomechanics 1994;9:291-296. [75] Sudhoff I, Van Driessche S, Laporte S, et al: Comparing three attachment systems used to determine knee kinematics during gait. Gait & Posture 2007;25:533-543. [76] Sati M, de Guise JA, Larouche S, et al: Quantitative assessment of skin-bone movement at the knee. The Knee 1996;3:121-138. [77] Penney GP, Batchelor PG, Hill DL, et al: Validation of a two- to three-dimensional registration algorithm for aligning preoperative CT images and intraoperative fluoroscopy images. Medical Physics 2001;28:1024-1032. [78] Weese J, Penney GP, Desmedt P, et al: Voxel-based 2-D/3-D registration of fluoroscopy images and CT scans for image-guided surgery. IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine 1997;1:284-293. [79] Banks SA, Hodge WA: Accurate measurement of three-dimensional knee replacement kinematics using single-plane fluoroscopy. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1996;43:638-649. [80] Hoff WA, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, et al: Three-dimensional determination of femoral- tibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy. Clinical Biomechanics 1998;13:455-472. [81] Tsai TY, Lu TW, Chen CM, et al: A volumetric model-based 2D to 3D registration method for measuring kinematics of natural knees with single-plane fluoroscopy. Medical Physics 2010;37:1273-1284. [82] Moro-oka TA, Hamai S, Miura H, et al: Can magnetic resonance imaging-derived bone models be used for accurate motion measurement with single-plane three-dimensional shape registration? Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2007;25:867-872. [83] Baker R: Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2006;3:4. [84] Gillette RL, Angle TC: Recent developments in canine locomotor analysis: a review. The Veterinary Journal 2008;178:165-176. [85] Marsolais G, McLean S, Derrick T, et al: Kinematic analysis of the hind limb during swimming and walking in healthy dogs and dogs with surgically corrected cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2003;222:739-743. [86] Eward C, Gillette R, Eward W: Effects of unilaterally restricted carpal range of motion on kinematic gait analysis of the dog. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2003;16:158. [87] Clements DN, Owen MR, Carmichael S, et al: Kinematic analysis of the gait of 10 labrador retrievers during treadmill locomotion. Veterinary Record 2005;156:478-481. [88] Torres BT, Punke JP, Fu YC, et al: Comparison of Canine Stifle Kinematic Data Collected with Three Different Targeting Models. Veterinary Surgery 2010;39:504-512. [89] Torres BT, Moens NM, Al-Nadaf S, et al: Comparison of overground and treadmill-based gaits of dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2013;74:535-541. [90] Feeney LC, Lin C-F, Marcellin-Little DJ, et al: Validation of two-dimensional kinematic analysis of walk and sit-to-stand motions in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2007;68:277-282. [91] Klinhom S, Chaichit T, Nganvongpanit K: A Comparative Study of Range of Motion of Forelimb and Hind Limb in Walk Pattern and Trot Pattern of Chihuahua Dogs Affected and Non-Affected with Patellar Luxation. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 2015;10:247-259. [92] Johnson JA, da Costa RC, Bhattacharya S, et al: Kinematic motion patterns of the cranial and caudal canine cervical spine. Veterinary Surgery 2011;40:720-727. [93] Igna C, Schuszler L, Menyhardt K: Kinematic variables to describe differences between normal dogs and dogs with osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral head. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Veterinary Medicine 2008;65:160-165. [94] Marsh AP, Eggebeen JD, Kornegay JN, et al: Kinematics of gait in Golden Retriever Muscular Dystrophy. Neuromuscular Disorders 2010;20:16-20. [95] Miqueleto N, Rahal SC, Agostinho F, et al: Kinematic analysis in healthy and hip- dysplastic German Shepherd dogs. The Veterinary Journal 2013;195:210-215. [96] Poy N, DeCamp C, Bennett R, et al: Additional kinematic variables to describe differences in the trot between clinically normal dogs and dogs with hip dysplasia. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2000;61:974-978. [97] Wachs K, Fischer M, Schilling N: Three-dimensional movements of the pelvis and the lumbar intervertebral joints in walking and trotting dogs. The Veterinary Journal 2016;210:46-55. [98] Gordon-Evans WJ, Evans RB, Knap KE, et al: Characterization of spatiotemporal gait characteristics in clinically normal dogs and dogs with spinal cord disease. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2009;70:1444-1449. [99] Bockstahler BA, Henninger W, Muller M, et al: Influence of borderline hip dysplasia on joint kinematics of clinically sound Belgian Shepherd dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2007;68:271-276. [100] Sutton JS, Garcia TC, Stover SM, et al: Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis in the pelvic limbs of normal and post-hemilaminectomy Dachshunds. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2016;29:202-208. [101] Jarvis S: Kinematic and kinetic analysis of canine thoracic limb amputees at a trot. Master: Colorado State University; 2011. [102] Boddeker J, Druen S, Meyer-Lindenberg A, et al: Computer-assisted gait analysis of the dog: Comparison of two surgical techniques for the ruptured cranial cruciate ligament. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2012;25:11-21. [103] Hogy SM, Worley DR, Jarvis SL, et al: Kinematic and kinetic analysis of dogs during trotting after amputation of a pelvic limb. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2013;74:1164-1171. [104] Caron A, Caley A, Farrell M, et al: Kinematic gait analysis of the canine thoracic limb using a six degrees of freedom marker set. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2014;27:461-469. [105] Gillette RL, Zebas CJ: A two-dimensional analysis of limb symmetry in the trot of Labrador retrievers. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 1999;35:515- 520. [106] Schaefer SL, DeCamp CE, Hauptman JG, et al: Kinematic gait analysis of hind limb symmetry in dogs at the trot. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1998;59:680-685. [107] Schwencke M, Smolders LA, Bergknut N, et al: Soft tissue artifact in canine kinematic gait analysis. Veterinary Surgery 2012;41:829-837. [108] Colborne GR, Innes Jf Fau - Comerford EJ, Comerford Ej Fau - Owen MR, et al: Distribution of power across the hind limb joints in Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2005;66:1563-1571. [109] Bertram JEA, Lee DV, Case HN, et al: Comparison of the trotting gaits of Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2000;61:832-838. [110] Filipe VM, Pereira JE, Costa LM, et al: Effect of skin movement on the analysis of hindlimb kinematics during treadmill locomotion in rats. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2006;153:55-61. [111] Vanweeren PR, Vandenbogert AJ, Barneveld A: Correction Models for Skin Displacement in Equine Kinematic Gait Analysis. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 1992;12:178-192. [112] Sha DH, Mullineaux DR, Clayton HM: Three-dimensional analysis of patterns of skin displacement over the equine radius. Equine Veterinary Journal 2004;36:665-670. [113] Taylor WR, Ehrig RM, Duda GN, et al: On the influence of soft tissue coverage in the determination of bone kinematics using skin markers. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2005;23:726-734. [114] Sanchez-Bustinduy M, de Medeiros MA, Radke H, et al: Comparison of kinematic variables in defining lameness caused by naturally occurring rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. Veterinary Surgery 2010;39:523-530. [115] Kim SY, Kim JY, Hayashi K, et al: Skin movement during the kinematic analysis of the canine pelvic limb. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2011;24:326-332. [116] Kawamata S, Ozawa J, Hashimoto M, et al: Structure of the rat subcutaneous connective tissue in relation to its sliding mechanism. Archives of Histology and Cytology 2003;66:273-279. [117] McDonald TA, Zepeda ML, Tomlinson MJ, et al: Subcutaneous administration of biotherapeutics: Current experience in animal models. Current Opinion in Molecular Therapeutics 2010;12:461-470. [118] Frost GI: Recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20): an enabling platform for subcutaneous drug and fluid administration. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 2007;4:427-440. [119] Bennett RL, DeCamp CE, Flo GL, et al: Kinematic gait analysis in dogs with hip dysplasia. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1996;57:966-971. [120] Hottinger HA, DeCamp CE, Olivier NB, et al: Noninvasive kinematic analysis of the walk in healthy large-breed dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1996;57:381- 388. [121] Kim J, Rietdyk S, Breur GJ: Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional systems for kinematic analysis of the sagittal motion of canine hind limbs during walking. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2008;69:1116-1122. [122] DeCamp CE, Soutas-Little RW, Hauptman J, et al: Kinematic gait analysis of the trot in healthy greyhounds. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1993;54:627-634. [123] Collins TD, Ghoussayni SN, Ewins DJ, et al: A six degrees-of-freedom marker set for gait analysis: Repeatability and comparison with a modified Helen Hayes set. Gait & Posture 2009;30:173-180. [124] Camomilla V, Bonci T, Dumas R, et al: A model of the soft tissue artefact rigid component. Journal of Biomechanics 2015;48:1752-1759. [125] Gao B, Zheng NN: Investigation of soft tissue movement during level walking: translations and rotations of skin markers. Journal of Biomechanics 2008;41:3189-3195. [126] Shultz R, Kedgley AE, Jenkyn TR: Quantifying skin motion artifact error of the hindfoot and forefoot marker clusters with the optical tracking of a multi-segment foot model using single-plane fluoroscopy. Gait & Posture 2011;34:44-48. [127] Fukui T, Otake Y, Kondo T: In which direction does skin move during joint movement? Skin Research and Technology 2016;22:181-188. [128] Lorensen WE, Cline HE: Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. SIGGRAPH Comput Graph 1987;21:163-169. [129] Canny J: A Computational Approach to Edge Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1986;PAMI-8:679-698. [130] Fu YC, Torres BT, Budsberg SC: Evaluation of a three-dimensional kinematic model for canine gait analysis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2010;71:1118-1122. [131] Miranda DL, Rainbow MJ, Crisco JJ, et al: Kinematic differences between optical motion capture and biplanar videoradiography during a jump-cut maneuver. J Biomech 2013;46:567-573. [132] Vilar JM, Rubio M, Carrillo JM, et al: Biomechanic characteristics of gait of four breeds of dogs with different conformations at walk on a treadmill. Journal of Applied Animal Research 2015;44:252-257. [133] Agostinho F, Rahal SC, Miqueleto N, et al: Kinematic analysis of Labrador Retrievers and Rottweilers trotting on a treadmill. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2011;24:185. [134] Ragetly C, Griffon D, Hsu M, et al: Kinetic and kinematic analysis of the right hind limb during trotting on a treadmill in Labrador Retrievers presumed predisposed or not predisposed to cranial cruciate ligament disease. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2012;73:1171-1177. [135] Stagni R, Fantozzi S, Cappello A: Propagation of anatomical landmark misplacement to knee kinematics: performance of single and double calibration. Gait & Posture 2006;24:137-141. [136] Evans HE, De Lahunta A: Miller's Anatomy of the Dog: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2013. [137] Kim SE, Jones SC, Lewis DD, et al: In-vivo three-dimensional knee kinematics during daily activities in dogs. J Orthop Res 2015;33:1603-1610. [138] Barre A, Jolles BM, Theumann N, et al: Soft tissue artifact distribution on lower limbs during treadmill gait: Influence of skin markers' location on cluster design. J Biomech 2015;48:1965-1971. [139] Cheze L, Fregly BJ, Dimnet J: A Solidification Procedure to Facilitate Kinematic Analyses Based on Video System Data. Journal of Biomechanics 1995;28:879-884. [140] Cappello A, Cappozzo A, LaPalombara PF, et al: Multiple anatomical landmark calibration for optimal bone pose estimation. Human Movement Science 1997;16:259- 274. [141] Ball KA, Pierrynowski MR: Modeling of the pliant surfaces of the thigh and leg during gait, Proceedings, BiOS'98 International Biomedical Optics Symposium, 1998 (available from International Society for Optics and Photonics). [142] Lucchetti L, Cappozzo A, Cappello A, et al: Skin movement artefact assessment and compensation in the estimation of knee-joint kinematics. Journal of Biomechanics 1998;31:977-984. [143] Andriacchi TP, Alexander EJ, Toney MK, et al: A Point Cluster Method for In Vivo Motion Analysis: Applied to a Study of Knee Kinematics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the ASME 1998;120:743-749. [144] Lu TW, O'Connor JJ: Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints. Journal of Biomechanics 1999;32:129-134. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59819 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 以皮膚表面標記為基礎的動作捕捉技術,目前已被應用於小動物臨床醫學領 域,如評估骨關節或神經性疾病導致的步態異常,或是用於評估手術介入後的治療 成效。然而此方法於應用上會受到皮膚以及軟組織與其下方骨骼於動物運動過程 中發生相對位移而產生誤差,此即為軟組織移動誤差。目前已有許多文獻深入探討 人類步態分析中動作捕捉技術的軟組織移動誤差,然而犬隻於這方面的研究仍十 分稀少。過去僅有兩篇文獻直接針對犬隻步態分析的軟組織移動誤差進行分析研 究,研究結果皆顯示軟組織移動誤差的存在,但研究方法受限於單平面研究與缺乏 精確的量化分析,而犬隻軟組織移動誤差的量化研究應藉由精準量測皮膚表面標 記點於三維空間中與其下骨骼之相對位移。本研究旨在整合電腦斷層骨模型與 X 光透視攝影影像,對比傳統皮膚表面標記光學式動作捕捉系統所得到之結果,量化 犬隻於膝關節獨立屈曲/伸展時軟組織移動在三維空間中導致皮膚表面標記的位 置誤差與其趨勢。研究中使用以模型為基礎的影像追蹤與定位技術,透過電腦斷層 骨表面模型結合膝關節透視攝影影像,獲得股骨與脛腓骨於三維空間中之精確位 置,同時以光學式動作捕捉系統捕捉被動運動時皮膚表面標記之移動軌跡,最後藉 由校正裝置所獲得之轉移矩陣,即可進行系統空間座標轉換,進行兩系統之皮膚表 面標記位置差距比較。研究最終共納入 6 隻健康混種中大型成犬,結果顯示在犬 隻膝關節被動運動過程中,皮膚表面標記相對於其下骨骼將出現明顯的位移,且與 膝關節屈曲角度並非呈現良好之線性關係。大腿肢段所得之平均軟組織移動誤差 為6.04 ± 0.61mm,顯著高於小腿的4.13±0.82mm(P=0.009)。大腿外側標記點 隨膝關節屈曲,往前側位移之誤差將趨於明顯。股骨外側上髁與內側上髁之標記點則隨膝關節屈曲,往後側位移之誤差更加明顯。大腿前側標記點為該肢段上誤差最 大的區域,且隨膝關節屈曲,往遠端位移之誤差更加顯著。小腿部分,以外側近端 標記點之軟組織移動誤差最大,且隨膝關節屈曲,往前側位移之誤差會更加顯著。 小腿前側及遠端標記點誤差之平均方均根值均小於 4 mm。本研究與過去人類下肢 軟組織移動誤差之相關文獻得到類似的結果,以整體肢段而言,軟組織移動所造成 的誤差在大腿肢段上比小腿更明顯,推測可能與大腿豐富的軟組織覆蓋有關。而軟 組織移動誤差較大之區域位於大腿前側與小腿外側近端,約可達 8 mm。
總結來說,本研究顯示在犬隻膝關節被動屈曲/伸展下,個別皮膚表面標記點 因軟組織移動導致的誤差在程度與方向上皆有所差異。基於此量化結果將可應用 於改善未來進行犬隻運動學量測時最佳皮膚表面標記組的選擇並提供標記點黏貼 的建議位置資訊,同時有助於犬隻軟組織移動誤差補償模型的發展,以期改善因軟 組織移動造成的關節與肢段運動學量測誤差,最終提高以皮膚表面標記為基礎的 動作捕捉技術在犬隻臨床步態分析應用的精確性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The skin marker-based motion capture had been used in small animals for the evaluation of orthopedic abnormalities and the associated treatment outcomes. However, a major source of errors of the approach is the associated soft tissue artifacts (STA) characterized as the movement of the soft tissue and skin relative to the underlying bones. Although the STA associated to the human kinematic analysis had been extensively investigated, to the authors’ knowledge, there were only two studies on the STA in dogs, which concluded that the STA does exist and has to be accounted for during canine kinematic analysis. However, the previous STA studies were limited by the planar analysis. For comprehensively characterizing the STA in dogs, measurement of three-dimensional (3- D) skin marker movement with respect to the underlying bones is warranted. The objective of this study is to assess in vivo the STA of selected markers on the thigh and shank of the canine hind limb at different stifle flexion angles. To address the issue, the motion capture system was incorporated with a C-arm fluoroscopy system for simultaneously measuring the coordinates of the skin markers and the fluoroscopic images of the stifle joint. A model-based tracking technique was applied to integrate the CT and fluoroscopic images of the stifle joint for determining the accurate 3-D poses of the femur and tibia, from which the displacement of the skin markers with respect to the corresponding bones could be derived. Total six healthy mixed, medium-to-large breed dogs were recruited. The results showed considerable movements of the skin markers relative to the underlying bones in a non-linear pattern during passive stifle flexion. During stifle flexion, the lateral thigh markers were displaced anteriorly and the anterior thigh markers were displaced proximally from the reference positions. The lateral shank markers were displaced anteriorly. The results of the current study were in agreement with the previous studies on lower limb STA in human. Generally, the amplitude of STA were greater around the stifle joint and the overall STA of the thigh markers were greater than those of shank markers, which might be explained by the abundant soft tissues coverage on the thigh. In conclusion, the findings demonstrated that the STA pattern of each marker were different in directions and magnitude. The better understanding of these errors was considered helpful for further developing STA-compensation algorithms in canine motion analysis. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:39:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R03643005-1.pdf: 7407061 bytes, checksum: c2d6f2525a5afbbb1bdfa4f9d8867b23 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 ........................................................................................................... i 誌謝 .................................................................................................................................. ii 中文摘要 ......................................................................................................................... iii ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... v 目錄 ................................................................................................................................ vii 圖目錄 .............................................................................................................................. x 表目錄 ........................................................................................................................... xiv 第一章 序言....................................................................................................................1
第二章 文獻探討與研究目標........................................................................................3 第一節 步態分析之歷史............................................................................................3 第二節 人類現代步態分析之方法............................................................................5 第一項 電子量角器................................................................................................5 第二項 加速規........................................................................................................7 第三項 陀螺儀........................................................................................................9 第四項 測力板......................................................................................................12 第五項 機械式動作追蹤儀..................................................................................14 第六項 光學式動作捕捉系統..............................................................................15 第七項 各種步態分析方法之比較與總結..........................................................17 第三節 立體攝影術應用於動作捕捉與其可能之誤差..........................................18 第一項 儀器誤差與環境干擾..............................................................................19 第二項 人為操作誤差..........................................................................................20 第三項 軟組織移動誤差......................................................................................21 第四節 人類下肢軟組織移動誤差之相關研究......................................................22 第一項 人類軟組織移動誤差侵入式測量方法..................................................22 一、 皮質骨釘..................................................................................................22 二、 骨外固定支架..........................................................................................24 三、 經皮骨骼追蹤器......................................................................................25 四、 放射線立體攝影術..................................................................................26 第二項 人類軟組織移動誤差非侵入式測量方法..............................................27 一、 數位 X 光 ................................................................................................. 27 二、 透視攝影..................................................................................................29 三、 透視攝影與三維模型影像契合..............................................................30 第三項 人類軟組織移動誤差研究小結..............................................................36 第五節 光學式動作捕捉應用於犬隻步態分析......................................................37 第六節 犬隻軟組織移動誤差之相關研究..............................................................39 第七節 研究目標......................................................................................................47 第八節 預期研究成果..............................................................................................48 第三章 材料與方法......................................................................................................49 第一節 整體實驗架構與流程..................................................................................49 第二節 受試犬..........................................................................................................50 第三節 實驗儀器與設備..........................................................................................50 第一項 電腦斷層掃描儀......................................................................................50 第二項 C-型臂 X 光透視攝影儀 ......................................................................... 52 第三項 光學式動作捕捉系統..............................................................................53 第四項 特製鋁製台車與客製化吊床..................................................................54 第四節 實驗流程......................................................................................................56 第一項 儀器設備配置與校正..............................................................................56 第二項 系統座標轉換..........................................................................................58 第三項 受試犬姿勢與皮膚表面標記黏貼..........................................................59 第四項 資料收集..................................................................................................64 一、 受試犬校正..............................................................................................64 二、 靜態資料..................................................................................................65 三、 動態資料..................................................................................................66 第五節 資料處理與數據分析..................................................................................66 第一項 資料處理..................................................................................................66 一、 斷層掃描影像處理..................................................................................66 二、 Vicon 系統................................................................................................ 68 三、 透視攝影影像..........................................................................................68 四、 以模型為基礎的影像追蹤與定位技術..................................................69 五、 局部座標系統之定義..............................................................................70 六、 軟組織移動誤差量化..............................................................................71 第二項 數據分析與統計分析..............................................................................73 一、 肢段長度變化..........................................................................................73 二、 外側上髁標記點矢狀平面位移..............................................................74 三、 靜態標記點資料......................................................................................74 四、 動態標記點資料......................................................................................75 第四章 結果..................................................................................................................77 第一節 受試犬資料統計..........................................................................................77 第二節 肢段長度變化..............................................................................................77 第三節 外側上髁標記點矢狀平面位移..................................................................79 第四節 標記點靜態軟組織移動誤差量化..............................................................80 第五節 標記點動態軟組織移動誤差量化..............................................................87 第六節 標記點矢狀面軟組織移動誤差分布圖......................................................90 第五章 討論..................................................................................................................91 第一節 與過去文獻之方法差異..............................................................................91 第二節 肢段長度變化..............................................................................................92 第三節 外側上髁標記點矢狀平面位移..................................................................94 第四節 標記點靜態軟組織移動誤差量化..............................................................97 第五節 標記點動態軟組織移動誤差量化..............................................................98 第六節 皮膚表面標記點位移對關節角度計算之可能影響................................103 第七節 非矢狀面之皮膚表面標記點位移............................................................105 第八節 未來展望....................................................................................................107 第九節 研究之限制.................................................................................................110 第六章 結論.................................................................................................................112 參考文獻 .......................................................................................................................113 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 犬隻大腿與小腿於膝關節被動屈曲/伸展時皮膚表面標記點 軟組織移動誤差之量化研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Quantitative Analysis of Soft Tissue Artifacts on the Thigh and
Shank of the Canine Hindlimb in Passive Stifle Flexion/Extension | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林正忠 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張雅珮,呂東武 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 犬隻步態分析,軟組織移動誤差,皮膚表面標記動作捕捉技術,以模型為基礎之追蹤定位技術,立體攝影術, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | canine kinematic analysis,soft tissue artifact,marker-based motion capture,model-based tracking,stereophotogrammetry, | en |
dc.relation.page | 120 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201700410 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-02-08 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 獸醫專業學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 臨床動物醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 臨床動物醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 7.23 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。