請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59785
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 邱祈榮(Chyi-Rong Chiou) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yang-Yu Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳暘予 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:37:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-16 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-02-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-02-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 錢靜、徐斌、陳積敏、聶影 (2015),打擊非法採伐與貿易:國際法主體功能定位分析,林業經濟 (12),48-53。
林俊成、林幸樺 (2014),導致全球非法伐採木材及其相關貿易因素探討,林業研究專訊, 21 (6),53-60。 刁鋼 (2014),中國木材供給及政策研究,博士論文,北京林業大學。 中國林業局 (2014),森林資源總量—第八次森林資源清查,pp.12。 楊文靜 (2014),越南已成為東南亞第一大木材及木製品出口國,中國人造紙,44。 邱祈榮、林俊成、何幸耘 (2012),REDD施行對臺灣進口原木與製材衝擊之評估,中華林學季刊,45 (2),271-288。 謝滿華 (2013),2012年我國木材與木製品發展狀況及2013年前景分析,中國人造板(8),31-36。 蔡昕妤、田明華、蔡飛、吳成亮、韓沐洵 (2013),中國木漿進口影響因素實證分析,林業經濟 (6),58-69。 聶淑媛 (2012),時間序列分析的歷史發展,廣西民族大學學報(自然科學版),18 (01), 24-28。 樊桐傑 (2012),我國進口政策對產業發展的影響研究,碩士論文,首都經濟貿易大學。 趙彤宇 (2011),中俄木材加工及貿易合作狀況分析,碩士論文,黑龍江大學。 張蕾、蔡志堅、牛利民 (2011),中國木材進口影響因素效應分析,林業經濟問題,31 (4), 319-323。 孫久靈、姜鳳萍、陸文明、孫睿 (2013),印尼木材非法採伐現狀分析,世界林業研究,26(3),79-82。 李夢丁 (2010),中國紙漿進口貿易研究,碩士論文,浙江大學。 魏暘艷 (2009),中國主要木質林產品貿易研究,碩士論文,中國林業科學研究院。 孫久靈 (2009),國際木材非法採伐與相關貿易問題研究,中國林業經濟 (3),1-8。 包曉斌、操建華 (2008),中國木材市場分析及政策評述,林業經濟(2),24-29。 曾琳麗、肖東生 (2008),湖南農產品進出口貿易影響因素分析,科技和產業,8 (3),55-58。 普雷馬-詹德拉·阿圖科拉拉、齊順然 (2006),馬來西亞的貿易政策:自由化過程、保護結構和改革議程,南洋資料譯叢 (3),60-74。 林茂文 (2006),時間數列分析與預測:管理與財經之應用 3版,華泰文化。 林惠玲 陳正倉 (2009),統計學:方法與應用 (四版)下冊,雙葉書廊。 葉小蓁 (2006),時間序列分析與應用,智勝文化。 陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵 (2011),多變量分析方法:統計軟體應用 (6版),五南。 史禕美 (2007),影響原木進口的因素分析,企業家天地下半月刊(理論版)(11),37-38。 胡冰 (2013),中國製造業貿易流量、貿易收支現狀及其影響因素的實證研究,博士論文,對外貿易經濟大學。 熊釜 (2013),我國進出口總額的影響因素分析,中國商貿(29),122-123。 李劍泉、陸文明、李智勇、段新芳、歐陽華 (2008),中國與俄羅斯木材貿易的影響因素分析,林業科技, 33(2), 55-58。 林幸樺 (2013),應用引力模型探討中國擬似非法原木貿易之研究,碩士論文,台灣大學。 楊舒婷 (2014),中國疑似非法木材進口來源變遷分析,碩士論文,台灣大學。 中國林業局 (2008),2008中國林業報告,北京:中國林業出版社。 Bank, W. (2006). Chainsaw Project An Interpol Perspective On Law Enforcement In Illegal Logging. Interpol & The World Bank, pp. 57. Blaser, J., Sarre, A., Food, Agriculture Organization of the United, N., & International Tropical Timber, O. (2010). Forest law compliance and governance in tropical countries : a region-by-region assessment of the status of forest law compliance and governance in the tropics, and recommendations for improvement, pp. 28. Commission, E. (2016)Guidance Document for The EU Timber Regulation. Brussels. Counsel, t. O. o. P. (2013). Illegal Logging Prohibition Act 2012. Canberra, pp. 73. Dieter, M., Englert, H., & Weimar, H. (2013). Wood from Illegal Harvesting in EU Markets: Estimations and Open Issues, pp. 1. Food, & Agriculture Organization of the United, Nations. (2015). FAO yearbook : Forest products, 2010-2014, pp. 358. Forests, G. A. P. o., & Summit, G. (2002). G8 Action Programme on Forests : backgrounders 2002. [Kananaskis, Alta.]: G8 Action Programme on Forests, pp. 16. Greenpeace. (2016). Europe failing to use legal armoury against illegal logging: Greenpeace,pp. 2. Hewitt, J. (2005). Failing the forests : Europe's illegal timber trade. Godalming, Surrey: WWF-UK, pp. 102. Hoare, A. (2015). Tackling Illegal Logging and the Related Trade What Progress and Where Next. London: Chatham House, pp. 79. Lawson, S., MacFaul, L., & Royal Institute of International, A. (2010). Illegal logging and related trade : indicators of the global response. London: Chatham House, pp. 154. Nellemann, C., INTERPOL Environmental Crime Programme (eds). (2012). Green Carbon, Black Trade: Illegal Logging, Tax Fraud and Laundering in the Worlds Tropical Forests. Birkeland Trykkeri AS, Norway, pp. 72. Palmer, C. (2001). The extent and causes of illegal logging: an analysis of a major cause of tropical deforestation in Indonesia. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), University College London. Register, F. (2015). Animal and plant Health Insepction Service. U.S: Authenticated U.S Government Information, pp. 6681-6683 Seneca Creek, A. (2004). 'Illegal' logging and global wood markets : the competitive impacts on the U.S. wood products industry: American Forest & Paper Association, pp. 20. Smith, J., Obidzinski, K., Subarudi, S., & Suramenggala, I. (2003). Illegal logging, collusive corruption and fragmented governments in Kalimantan, Indonesia. int. forest. rev. International Forestry Review, 5(3), 293-302. Smith, W. (2002). The global problem of illegal logging Senior Associate, Forest Programme World Resources Institute, pp. 3. Union, E. (2005). Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 of 20 December 2005 on the establishment of a FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the European Community. Official Journal- European Union Legislation L, 48(347), 1-6. Wellesley, L. (2014). Trade in Illegal Timber The Response in China. London: Chatham House, pp. 31. Romeu, J. L., & Ozturk, A. (1993). A Comparative Study of Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Multivariate Normality. JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 46(2), 309. Michael H. Kutner, Christopher J. Nachtsheim, John Neter, William Li (2005),“Applied Linear Statistical Models”, 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Malaysia, Kementerian Perusahaan Perladangan dan, K., & Lembaga Perindustrian Kayu, M. (2009). NATIP : national timber industry policy, 2009-2020. Putrajaya; Kuala Lumpur: Secretary General Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities ; Malaysia Timber Industry Board. Quandt, R. E. (1958). The Estimation of the Parameters of a Linear Regression System Obeying Two Separate Regimes. Journal of the American Statistical Association Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(284), 873-880. Quandt, R. E. (1972). A New Approach to Estimating Switching Regressions. jamerstatasso Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67(338), 306-310. Quandt, R. E. (1975). Estimating mixtures of normal distributions and switching regressions. Princeton, N.J.: Econometric Research Program, Princeton University. Feenstra, R. C., Hai, W., Woo, W. T., & Yao, S. (1999). Discrepancies in International Data: An Application to China-Hong Kong Entrepôt Trade. amereconrevi The American Economic Review, 89(2), 338-343. Ferrantino, M. J., & Wang, Z. (2008). Accounting for discrepancies in bilateral trade: The case of China, Hong Kong, and the United States. China Economic Review, 19(3), 502-520. Hoare, A., & Energy, E. a. R. (2015a). Illegal Logging and Related Trade The Response in Malaysia. London: Chatham House. Lee, J. H., Sigmund, K., Dieckmann, U., & Iwasa, Y. (2015). Games of corruption: how to suppress illegal logging. Journal of theoretical biology, 367, 1-13. UKGTO.(2016). GLOBAL TIMBER .ORG .UK. Retrieved from http://www.globaltimber.org.uk Bank, T. W. (2016). World Bank Open Data. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org EIA. (2016). Environmetal Investigation Agency. Retrieved from https://eia-international.org FAO. (2016). FAOSTAT. Retrieved from http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E Nations, U. (2016). UN Comtrade Database. Retrieved from http://comtrade.un.org International, T. (2016). Transparency International.Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/ | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59785 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 1990年代中後期,國際社會開始逐漸重視森林非法採伐和相關貿易問題,非法採伐不但破壞了森林的永續性管理及公平性,也致使毀林、社會衝突及政府經濟的衝擊。中國為世界重要的木材消費與進口國,也因此可能成為非法木材的集散地,雖然中國近年來在打擊非法採伐及貿易上有做了很多努力,但仍有改進的空間。
首先,本文進行中國1992年到2014的原木進口量現況分析,發現中國進口量於2000年後開始有大量增長的趨勢,因此選定2000年到2014年作為分析主軸,接著,進行中國疑似非法原木進口量的估算,並探究影響中國疑似非法原木進口量的因素,建立一時間序列模式並預測2014年進口量的走勢,最後,為遏止中國疑似非法原木貿易的發生,提出了相對應的策略與建議。 實證結果顯示:1、出口國的GDP增加1%,平均使得中國疑似非法原木進口量增加5,591立方公尺;森林覆蓋率增加1%,平均疑似非法進口量增加124,376立方公尺;農村人口比率增加1%,平均疑似非法原木進口量減少159,866立方公尺。2、平均而言,影響疑似非法進口量多寡的地區,由最高至最低分別為,俄羅斯地區、大洋洲地區、非洲地區、東南亞地區以及南美洲地區。3、不同年度的事件,對中國疑似非法原木進口量產生迥然差異,2000年,發生事件為中國自主進口,估計進口量增加2,470,273立方公尺;2004年,發生南亞海嘯,估計進口量減少2,715,077立方公尺;2008年,發生金融海嘯,估計進口量下滑891,472立方公尺;2012年,發生國際防堵轉移,估計進口量增加1,075,970立方公尺。4、2014年,預測量與實際進口量,兩者差異高達400萬立方公尺,原因主要來自於巴布亞新幾內亞、俄羅斯、莫三比克等國家,這些國家總共增量約378.6萬立方公尺。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In the late 1990s, the international community began to pay attention to illegal logging and associated trade of forest, illegal logging not only undermined the fairness and sustainable management of forests, also led to deforestation, social conflict and the government's economic impact. China is the major consumer of timber and importing country, and thus may become illegal timber distribution center in recent years. Although China have made a lot of effort to combat illegal logging and trade, but there is rare improvement.
First, this research analyzed the situation of timber imports in China from 1992 to 2014, finding that China imports grew up exponentially after 2000 so selecting the time from 2000 to 2014 as the main analysis time. Then, estimate China suspected of illegal timber imports, explore factors that affected China suspected of illegal timber imports, establish a time series model and forecast 2014 imports of the trend. Eventually, to prevent China from trading suspected of illegal timber, proposing some corresponding strategies and recommendations. The empirical results showed: 1, GDP from exporting countries increased by 1% and then the average amount of suspected illegal timber imports increased 5,591 cubic meters; forest coverage increased by 1%, the average amount of suspected illegal timeber imports increased 124,376 cubic meters; rural population ratio increased 1%, with an average of suspected illegal timber imports decreasing 159,866 cubic meters. 2, on average, affecting the amount of suspected illegal imports of areas, from the highest to the lowest, respectively, were Russian regions, Oceania, Africa, Southeast Asia and South America. 3, events from different years affected China's suspected illegal timber imports vastly. In 2000, the event of independent imports in China happened, imports increased by an estimated 2,470,273 cubic meters; in 2004, tsunami in southeast Asia occured, it is estimated to reduce imports of 2,715,077 cubic meters; in 2008, the financial crisis occured, the estimated volume of imports fell 891,472 cubic meters; 2012, international event preventing countries from trading illegal timber occured, it is estimated to increased imports of 1,075,970 cubic meters. 4, 2014, the difference between forecast values and the actual amount of imports was up to 4 million cubic meters because Papua New Guinea, Russia, Mozambique and other countries traded illegal timber with China, and total amount of illegal timber trade were about 3.786 million cubic meters. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:37:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03625062-1.pdf: 1794035 bytes, checksum: 3f0e4bfa584e6251e1b3119aa343e532 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝.....................................i
摘要....................................ii Abstract...............................iii 目錄.....................................v 圖目錄.................................vii 表目錄................................viii 第一章、緒論..............................1 第一節、研究背景與動機...................1 第二節、研究目的........................2 第三節、研究範圍與限制...................3 第四節、研究流程與架構...................3 第二章、文獻回顧...........................5 第一節、非法木材貿易.....................5 第二節、非法採伐的相關研究...............10 第三節、時間序列分析....................11 第四節、轉換迴歸模式....................14 第五節、影響疑似非法原木進出口因素.......15 第三章、工業用原木進出口概況分析...........18 第一節、中國工業用原木之概況.............18 第二節、全球五大洲工業用原木之概況.......21 第三節、全球事件與非法採伐情形...........27 第四章、材料與方法........................31 第一節、研究方法流程圖...................31 第二節、研究範圍與資料來源...............33 第三節、原始資料處理.....................36 第四節、疑似非法原木之模式建立............37 第五節、疑似非法原木之模式評估............45 第六節、疑似非法原木之模式修正............48 第五章、實證分析...........................56 第一節、中國工業用原木進口貿易之趨勢.......56 第二節、疑似非法工業用原木進口估算結果.....59 第三節、迴歸模式之建置...................66 第四節、迴歸模式之評估...................72 第五節、導入時間序列模式.................75 第六節、最終模式之結果與預測.............82 第六章、結論與建議........................88 第一節、結論...........................88 第二節、建議與未來策略..................90 第三節、研究限制.......................91 參考文獻.................................93 附錄一...................................98 附錄二...................................98 附錄三..................................101 附錄四..................................102 附錄五..................................103 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 應用時間序列模式探討中國疑似非法原木貿易之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Appling Time Series Model to the Trade of Illegal Logs in China | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 柳婉郁,林俊成 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 中國,非法原木貿易,資料差異估計法,時間序列分析,轉換迴歸模式, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | China,Illegal log Trade,Data Discrepancy,Time series analysis,Switching Regression Model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 105 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201700455 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-02-10 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.75 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。