請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5975
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 戚樹誠 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yen-Te Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 巫彥德 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-16T16:18:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-20 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-16T16:18:57Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
1. 王秀愧、陳舜文(2005),華人文化脈絡下學業成就、努力程度對品格形象影響之研究,台灣心理學會第四十四屆年會 2. 池進通、李鴻文與陳芬儀(2008),五大人格特質與工作績效關係之研究,經營管理論叢 Vol.4,No 2,2008 第1-9頁 3. 吳佳璇(2011),業務人員人格特質對業務績效之影響,國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文 4. 吳季珊(2006),努力本質觀對華人少年憂鬱情緒之預測力,國立臺灣大學心理研究所碩士論文 5. 吳宣蓓(2011),工時變遷與過長工時對健康的影響,國立臺灣大學公共衛生學院健康政策與管理研究所碩士論文 6. 徐富珍、呂庭慧(2009),加班現象的成因與影響之研究,第四屆「社會學與心理學的對話」學術研討會 7. 張泰銓(2010),具智力增進觀之華人青少年的脆弱易感性:努力批評與努力本質觀的效應,國立臺灣大學心理研究所碩士論文 8. 鄭雁比(2006),華人青少年努力概念與道德及罪惡感之內隱連結,國立臺灣大學心理研究所碩士論文 9. 劉錫濱(2007),領導風格、員工人格特質與工作投入、員工績效之關聯性研-以電子產業為例,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文 二、英文部分 1. Antonioni, D. (1998). Relationship between the big five personality factors and conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9(4), 336-355. 2. Asch, S. E. 1946. Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41: 258-290. 3. Brandel, M. (2002) New technology: Covering all the bases. Computerworld 36: 28–29. 4. Cheng, Y.-P., Lay, K.-L., & Tseng, H.-Y. (2005). Is “industry” an essence of morality among Chinese adolescents? Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 5. Costa ,Jr. P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. 6. Costa ,Jr. P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. 7. Costa, Jr. P. T., & McCrae R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-P-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources 8. Diner, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1987). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous change in performance, strategy, and achievement cognition following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 , 451-461 9. Dompnier, B., Pansu, P., & Bressoux, P. 2006. An integrative model of scholastic judgments: Pupils’ characteristics, class context, halo effect and internal attributions. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(2): 119-133. 10. Elabach, K. D.,Cable, D. M. ,& Sherman , J. W.(2010) How passive 'face time' affects perceptions of employees: Evidence of spontaneous trait inference.2010 63: 735 Human Relations 11. Feeley, T. H. 2002. Evidence of halo effects in student evaluations of communication instruction. Communication Education, 51: 225-237. 12. Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From ace to zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. Advances in Personality Assessment, 1, 203–234. 13. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative 'description of personality': The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216-1229. 14. Goldberg, L.R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26-34 15. Gopinath, C. (2003) Those workplace myths are true! Businessline, 10 March, p. 1. 16. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2001). Cross-cultural response to failure: Considering outcome attributions with different goals. In F. Salili, Chiu, C. & Hong, Y. (Eds.), Student motivation: The culture and context of learning (pp. 203-219). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers. 17. Guilford, J. P. (1959). Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill. 18. Jawahar & Mattsson,2005; Zysberg & Nevo, 2004; Jennings, Palmer, & Thomas, 2004; Feeley, 2002; Murphy,Jaco, & Anhalt, 1993; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977). 19. Jawahar, I. M., & Mattsson, J. 2005. Sexism and beautyism effects in selection as a function of self-monitoring level of decision maker. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3): 563-573. 20. Jennings, T., Palmer, J. K., & Thomas, A. 2004. Effects of performance context on processing speed and performance ratings. Journal of Business & Psychology, 18: 453-463. 21. Joyce A. (2002) Early to arrive, early to exit. Less face time in the office can mean little recognition, fewer promotions. The Washington Post, 23 June, p. H06. 22. Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., & Koestner, J. (1987). Praise, involvement, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 , 383-390. 23. Kossek EE, Van Dyne L (2008) Face-time matters: A cross-level model of how work-life flex¬ibility influences work performance of individuals and groups. In: Korabik K, Leor D, and Whitehead D (eds) Handbook of Work–Family Integration: Research, Theory, and Best Practices. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 305–330 24. Lay, K.-L., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2005). Moral, pragmatic, and entity concepts of academic effort among Chinese adolescents: A developmental perspective. In Keng-Ling Lay (Chair), Reconsidering the effects of entity and incremental feedbacks in academic situations: Findings from a Chinese population. Symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA, USA. 25. Lay, K.-L., Wu, C.-S., Tsai, Y.-M. & Chen, K.-H. (2009). The 'Entity View of Effort' Predicts Adolescents' Learning Behaviors and Emotions. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver, CO, USA. 26. Ryan L. (2005) Face time: The new assembly line. In this era of the ‘knowledge worker’, why do so many managers still insist on long office hours? BusinessWeek.com, 22 April, available at: http://www.businessweek.com/careers/content/apr2005/ca20050422_7217_ca004.htm. 27. Schunk, D. H. (1983). Ability versus effort attributional feedback: Differential effects on self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75 , 848-856. 28. Schunk, D. H. (1984). Sequential attributional feedback and children’s achievement behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 , 1159-1169. 29. Stevenson, H. W. (1985). Cognitive performance and academic achievement of Japanese, Chinese, and American children. Child Development. 56, 718-734. 30. Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S., Chen, C., Stigler, J., Hsu, C. C., & Kitamura, S. (1990).Contexts of achievement: A study of American, Chinese, and Japanese. Monographsof the Society for Research in Child Development, 55 , 1-2. 31. Perlow, LA. (1997) Finding Time. How Corporations, Individuals, and Families Can Benefit from New Work Practices. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 32. Zysberg, L., & Nevo, B. 2004. “The smarts that counts?” Psychologists' ecision- making in personnel selection. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1): 117-124. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5975 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究主要探討之主題為從員工知覺的角度探討台灣工時過長現象的成因,工作中的加班不可避免,而加班的目的本為用更多的時間完成需要完成的工作,而在台灣社會之中,加班的目的不只是為了完成工作,還可能考慮到主管與同事觀感,因此本研究將探討人們對超時工作者的看法、主管和部屬對於超時工作者的認知差異,與部屬對超時工作者的認知是否造成加班行為的產生,研究者以月暈效應及認知偏誤來解釋此一現象。
本研究分為探索研究、正式研究(第一階段)與正式研究(第二階段),探索研究利用文獻探討、質性研究法與查詢網路資料,歸納出人們的超時工作者看法;正式研究(第一階段),採用問卷調查法,將問卷發放給台灣大學EMBA 學生,用以建立超時工作者性格特質量表;正式研究(第二階段),採用問卷調查法,探討人們對超時工作者性格特質的認知偏誤之可能影響。 研究結果顯示,受試者對於超時工作者性格特質的看法,可以分為兩個面向:「努力認真度」與「思考靈活度」,主管認為超時工作者的努力認真度較準時下班者高,員工則認為兩者無顯著差異,且員工在推測主管看法與主管真實看法無顯著差異;員工推測主管對超時工作者努力認真度的認知,可以預測其自身加班行為。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The theme of this study is to investigate, from the perspective of employee perceptions, the possible causes of pervasive overtime in Taiwan. Overtime at work is inevitable, if the reason being that a worker has something necessary to finish. However, in Taiwan, the purpose of having overtime is not only for the sake of finishing jobs but to accommodate the views from colleagues and supervisors. Therefore, this study will examine people’s views on overtime workers, the perceptual; differences between supervisors and subordinates, and whether subordinates’ perceptions of an overtime worker influence their own overtime behavior. The researcher uses halo effect and perceptual biases to explain this phenomenon.
The study is composed of three parts: exploratory study, formal study (Phase I) and formal study (Phase II). Exploratory study includes literature research, qualitative study and examining information from the internet to derive people's general views on overtime work; Formal study (phase I) includes a survey questionnaire. The data is collected from an EMBA class in National Taiwan University. Formal study (phase II), includes another survey questionnaire to investigate whether the possible effects of perceptual biases of overtime workers. The results showed two dimensions of perceptions of the personality traits of overtime workers:'the tendency of working hard' and 'the degree of flexible thinking'. Managers believed that overtime workers have higher tendency of working hard than do normal worker, but subordinates believed that there is no difference between the two. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between what managers believed (of the personality traits of overtime workers) and what subordinates thought that their supervisors believe. And the tendency of working hard that subordinates thought their supervisors believe predicted subordinates’ own overtime behavior. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:18:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00741055-1.pdf: 2556870 bytes, checksum: 10b6ab79c22affe26f8a0abbe0e31d24 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 1
中文摘要 3 Abstract 4 圖目錄 7 表目錄 8 第一章 緒論 9 第一節 研究動機 9 第二節 研究問題 12 第三節 研究流程 12 第二章 探索研究 14 第一節 人們對超時工作的知覺偏誤 14 第二節 努力與能力 17 第三節 建構超時工作者的特質面向 19 第四節 結論 21 第三章 正式研究(第一階段): 超時工作者特質面向的建立與實證 23 第一節 研究流程 23 第二節 量表題項之建構 23 第三節 資料收集與分析 25 第四章 正式研究(第二階段):假說驗證 29 第一節 研究架構與研究假說 29 第二節 研究之變項與衡量 33 第三節 資料分析方法 33 第四節 敘述性統計量 35 第五節 信度分析 36 第六節 成對樣本T檢定 37 第七節 獨立樣本T 檢定 43 第八節 相關分析 44 第九節 迴歸分析 45 第十節 假設結果之驗證 47 第五章 結論與建議 50 第一節 研究結果與結論 50 第二節 管理實務上的意涵 54 第三節 討論與後續研究建議 54 參考文獻 60 附錄一 64 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 探討主管與部屬對於超時工作者的認知差異 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Investigating the Cognitive Differences between Managers and Subordinates on Overtime Worker | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳淑貞,梁欣光,羅新興 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 月暈效應,台灣,努力,超時工作,性格特質, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | halo effect,Taiwan,working hard,overime,personality trait, | en |
dc.relation.page | 71 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf | 2.5 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。