請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59482
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃心怡(Hisn-I Huang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yen-Ching Lu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 呂晏菁 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:25:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-11 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2017-08-11 | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-06-14 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部份
方紫薇,2010,〈網路沉迷、因應、孤寂感與網路社會支持之關係:男女大學生之比較〉,《教育心理學報》,41(4):773-798。 王千逸,2006,《實習教師求職壓力與因應策略之研究》,臺北:政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。 王冠今,2009,《台灣社區老人的社會支持改變、健康狀況改變與社會參與之縱貫性研究》,臺北:臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系博士論文。 全國自殺防治中心,2007,〈95年度計畫成果摘要〉,全國自殺防治中心網頁,http://117.56.4.215/information.aspx?uid=135&pid=3602,2016/11/18。 全國自殺防治中心,2008,〈一步一腳印-先導區成果分享〉,《自殺防治網通訊》,3(3):3-10。 全國自殺防治中心,2010,〈媒體、社會、醫療人人都是自殺防治守門人〉,《自殺防治網通訊》,5(2):5-6。 全國自殺防治中心,2011,〈自殺防治人員工作手冊-政府機關網絡〉,自殺防治中心網頁,http://tspc.tw/tspc/upload/tbnews/20111213153615_file5.pdf,2016/03/19。 全國自殺防治中心,2012,〈台灣自殺防治策略與現況〉,自殺防治中心網頁,http://tspc.tw/tspc/uploadfiles/File/1(1).pdf,2016/11/14。 全國自殺防治中心,2013,〈汙名化:自殺防治的重大阻礙〉,《自殺防治網通訊》,8(3):2-3。 全國自殺防治中心,2014a,〈珍愛生命守門人〉,自殺防治中心網頁,http://tspc.tw/tspc/portal/public/press_list.jsp?type=B&pages=2,2016/04/20。 全國自殺防治中心,2014b,〈關懷訪視指引〉,自殺防治中心網頁,http://tspc.tw/tspc/portal/public/press_list.jsp?type=B&pages=2,2016/05/06。 全國自殺防治中心,2014c,〈自殺者親友關懷手冊〉,自殺防治中心網頁,http://tspc.tw/tspc/portal/theme/index.jsp?sno=91,2016/11/24。 全國自殺防治中心,2015,〈自殺防治工作要覽〉,《自殺防治網通訊》,10(4):9-11。 全國自殺防治中心,2016,〈計畫目標〉,自殺防治中心網頁http://tspc.tw/tspc/portal/center/index.jsp?sno=79,2016/03/19。 朱僑麗、陳肇男,2012,〈非正式社會支持網絡在全民健康保險實施前後對健康檢查服務利用之影響〉,《台灣衛誌》,31(2):164-175。 江弘基,2013,《自殺企圖通報個案的受助經驗:南投區心理衛生服務中心的田野觀察》,臺北:臺灣大學健康政策與管理研究所博士論文。 吳佳儀,2014,〈從個人面向強化保護因子〉,《自殺防治網通訊》,9(4):2-5。 呂寶靜,2000,〈老人朋友網絡支持功能之初探〉,《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,4(2):43-90。 李宗派,2003,〈探討個案管理概念與實務過程〉,《社區發展季刊》,104:307-320。 李明濱、廖士程,2006,〈自殺原因與防治策略〉,《台灣醫學》,10(3):366-373。 李明濱、戴傳文、廖士程、江弘基,2006,〈自殺防治策略推動現況與展望〉,《護理雜誌》,53(6):5-13。 李美媛,2007,〈自殺相關理論探討〉,《諮商與輔導》,260:2-6。 沈勝昂,2000,《壓力因應的性別差異:質與量的分析》,桃園:中央警察大學出版社。 周玉慧,1997,〈社會支持之平衡性與身心健康:台灣青年學生之分析〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,9(1):161-201。 周孟嫻、紀玉臨、謝雨生,2010,〈臺灣自殺率具空間群聚嗎?模仿效應或結構效應〉,《人口學刊》,41:1-65 林杏真,2002,《自傷青少年生活壓力、社會支持與自我強度的發展及其關係研究》,臺北:臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。 林俊佑,2013,《工作壓力與社會支持對職業倦怠、工作滿意及生活品質之影響-以臺灣地區自殺關懷訪視員為例》,桃園市:中原大學心理學系碩士論文。 林淑馨,2010,《質性硏究 : 理論與實務》,高雄:巨流圖書公司。 林綺雲,2009,〈自殺評估與溝通技巧—自殺防治守門人的十八般武藝〉,《諮商與輔導》,284:48-55。 林綺雲,2010a,〈自殺防治守門人的困境與自我照顧〉,《諮商與輔導》,295:49-55。 林綺雲,2010b,〈個人與社會的關係-從涂爾幹的自殺論談起〉,《諮商與輔導》,293:55-60。 邱文彬,2001,〈社會支持因應效果的回顧與展望〉,《國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學》,11(4):311-330。 侯慧明、陳玉敏,2008,〈長期照護機構老人孤寂感及其相關因素探討〉,《實證護理》,4(3):212-221。 南玉芬,2014,〈衛生與福利攜手~自殺通報關懷服務的新契機〉,《社區發展季刊》,145:128-142。 柯慧貞、林美芳、廖聆岑、蘇鈴茉、林旻沛、丁建谷、朱朝煌、劉秀霞、陳孟莉,2004,〈南區大專校院學生之社團活動參與程度及其與社會支持、壓力因應型態、憂鬱、自殺之關係〉,《中華心理衛生學刊》,17:43-66。 胡素慈,2002,《國小學生因應日常生活問題策略及其影響因素之徑路分析研究》,高雄:國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。 馬上鈞,2001,〈休閒社會支持與壓力之初探〉,《國立臺灣體育學院學報》,9:237-248。 張兩溉,2002,《醫師個人屬性、行為特質與壓力感知、趨避意向關係之探討》,高雄:中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 張芷蓁、朱旭華、林正泰、林綺雲,2014,〈自殺防治關懷訪視員實務經驗之探討〉,《健康科技期刊》,2(2):32-51。 張珮玉、葉國明、王文雄、余展輝、孫明忠,2005,〈女性校長的工作壓力來源與支持性系統之研究〉,國家教育研究院(編),《102期候用校長專題研究集》,臺北:國家教育研究院。 教育部,1996,《校園自我傷害防治處理手冊》,臺北:教育部訓委會。 陳恆鈞,2008,〈協力網絡治理之優點與罩門〉,《研習論壇月刊》,92:165-189。 陳億貞譯,2006,《普通心理學》,臺北:雙葉書廊。譯自Robert J. Sternberg. Pathways to Psychology, 2nd. Singapore: Wadsworth. 2000. 馮韻文譯,2013,《自殺論》,臺北:五南。譯自 Émile Durkheim. Le suicide: etude de sociologie. Paris: Librairie Felix Alcan. 1930. 黃芸瑩,2015,《大學生憂鬱、社會支持與諮商求助態度之相關研究》,臺北:臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。 黃俐婷,2003,〈探討青少年接受到的社會支持〉,《社區發展季刊》,103:144-156。 黃俐婷,2004,〈家庭支持的結構與功能分析〉,《社區發展季刊》,105:367-380。 黃翊綾,2013,《影響單親家庭使用非正式支持或正式支持的因素之探討》,臺北:臺灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。 黃惠惠,2002,《情緒與壓力管理》,臺北:張老師文化公司。 黃靖雯,2010,《國中生生活壓力、壓力因應策略與物質使用之相關研究》,高雄:高雄醫學大學醫學社會學與社會工作學研究所碩士論文。 黃榮護、黃東益、郭昱瑩、謝仁和,2000,《以議題管理途徑型塑臺北市政府多部門協力關係策略》,臺北:臺北市政府研究發展考核委員會。 黃寶園,2010,〈社會支持在壓力反應歷程中的中介效果〉,《中華心理衛生學刊》,23(3):401-436。 新北市衛生局,2016,〈免費辦理幸福捕手課程〉,新北市衛生局網頁,http://117.56.4.215/information.aspx?uid=135&pid=3602,2016/11/18。 葉在庭,2001,〈青少年情緒調適、焦慮、社會支持及生活事件與自殺意念的關係〉,《中華輔導學報》,10:151-178。 廖士程,2012,〈台灣自殺防治成果與展望〉,《自殺防治網通訊》,7(4):3-4。 熊蕙筠,2011,〈傾聽失落.孤單.痛苦的聲音--自殺病患關懷訪視服務〉,亞東院訊網頁,http://www.femh.org.tw/epaperadmin/viewarticle.aspx?ID=3259,2016/005/06。 蔡秀玲、楊智馨,1999,《情緒管理》,臺北:楊智文化。 衛生福利部統計處,2015,〈104死因統計年報〉,衛生福利部統計處網頁,http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_list_no=6201,2016/12/03。 鄭照順,1999,《青少年生活壓力與輔導》,臺北:心理出版社。 黎士鳴譯,2008,《心理學概論》,臺北:雙葉書廊。譯自John W. Santrock. Psychology Essentials, 2nd. New York: Mc Graw Hill. 2003. 賴倩瑜、陳瑞蘭、林惠琦、吳佳珍、沈麗惠,2000,《心理衛生》,新北:揚智文化。 顏寧譯,2011,《質性研究設計與施作指南》,臺北:五南。譯自 Sharan B. Merriam. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. New York: John Wiley & Sans. 2009. 羅清俊,2015,《公共政策:現象觀察與實務操作》,新北:揚智出版社。 貳、西文部份 Burnette, C., R. Ramchand, and L. Ayer. 2015. “Gatekeeper training for suicide prevention: A theoretical model and review of the empirical literature.” in http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1000/RR1002/RAND_RR1002.pdf. Latest update 12 November 2016. Campas, B. E., J. K. Connor-Smith, H. Saltzman, A. H. Thomsen, and M. E. Wadsworth. 2001. “Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: problems, progress, and potential in theory and research.” Psychological bulletin 127(1): 87-127. Cantor, M. H. 1989. “Social care: Family and community support systems.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 503(1): 99-112. Carver, C. S., M. F. Scheier, and J. K. Weintraub. 1989. “Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach.” Journal of personality and social psychology 56(2): 267-283. Cheng, S. T., and A. Chan. 2007. “Multiple pathways from stress to suicidality and the protective effect of social support in Hong Kong adolescents. ” Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 37(2): 187-196. Cho, Y. B., and N. Haslam. 2010. “Suicidal ideation and distress among immigrant adolescents: The role of acculturation, life stress, and social support.” Journal of youth and adolescence 39(4): 370-379. Cohen, S., and G. McKay. 1984. “Social support, stress and the buffering hypothesis: A theoretical analysis.” Handbook of psychology and health 4: 253-267. Cohen, S., and T. A. Wills. 1985. “Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.” Psychological bulletin 98(2): 310-357. Coyne, J. C. 1976. “Depression and the response of others.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 85: 186-193. Cross, W., M. M. Matthieu, Cerel, J., and K. L. Knox. 2007. “Proximate outcomes of gatekeeper training for suicide prevention in the workplace.” Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 37(6): 659-670. Cutrona, C. E., and D. W. Russell. 1987. “The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress.” Advances in personal relationships 1(1): 37-67. Davis. P. 2001. “QPR Gatekeeper Training Results for Different Age Groups.” in http://www.slideserve.com/adena-hampton/qpr-gatekeeper-training-results-for-different-age-groups Latest update 12 November 2016. De Wilde, E. J., C. W. M. Kienhorst, R. F. W. Diekstra, and W. H. G. Wolters. 1994. “Social support, life events, and behavioral characteristics of psychologically distressed adolescents at high risk for attempting suicide.” Adolescence 29(113): 49-60. Folkman, S., and J. T. Moskowitz. 2000. “Positive affect and the other side of coping.” American psychologist 55(6): 647. Folkman, S., and R. S. Lazarus. 1985. “If it changes it must be a process: study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination.” Journal of personality and social psychology 48(1): 150-170. Folkman, S., and R. S. Lazarus. 1986. “Stress processes and depressive symptomatology.” Journal of abnormal psychology 95(2): 107-113. Folkman, S., R. S. Lazarus, R. J. Gruen, and A. DeLongis. 1986. “Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms.” Journal of personality and social psychology 50(3): 571-579. Grover, K. E., K. L. Green, J. W. Pettit, L. L.Monteith, M. J. Garza, and A. Venta. 2009. “Problem solving moderates the effects of life event stress and chronic stress on suicidal behaviors in adolescence.” Journal of Clinical Psychology 65(12): 1281-1290. Gurtman, M. B. 1986. “Depression and the response of others: reevaluating the reevaluation.” Journal of abnormal psychology 95(1): 99-101. Heppner, P. P., T. E. Witty, and W. A. Dixon. 2004. “Problem-Solving Appraisal and Human Adjustment A Review of 20 Years of Research Using the Problem Solving Inventory.” The Counseling Psychologist 32(3): 344-428. Holmén, K., and H. Furukawa. 2002. “Loneliness, health and social network among elderly people—a follow-up study.” Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 35(3): 261-274. Hutchinson, S. L., C. K. Baldwin, and S. S. Oh. 2006. “Adolescent coping: Exploring adolescents' leisure-based responses to stress.” Leisure Sciences 28(2): 115-131. Isaac, M., Elias, B., Katz, L. Y., Belik, S. L., Deane, F. P., Enns, M. W., & Sareen, J. 2009. “Gatekeeper training as a preventative intervention for suicide: a systematic review.” The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 54(4): 260-268. Iwasaki, Y., J. Zuzanek, and R. C. Mannell. 2001. “The effects of physically active leisure on stress-health relationships.” Canadian Journal of Public Health 92(3): 214-218. Jacobson, D. E. 1986. “Types and timing of social support.” Journal of health and Social Behavior 27(3): 250-264. Lazarus, R. S. 1993. “Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future.” Psychosomatic Medicine 55: 2324-2347. Lazarus, R. S., and S. Folkman. 1984. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer. Mann, J. J., A. Apter, J. Bertolote, A. Beautrais, D. Currier, A. Haas, U. Hegerl, J. Lonnqvist, K. Malone, A. Marusic, L. Mehlum, G. Patton, M. Phillips, W. Rutz, Z. Rihmer, A. Schmidtke, D. Shaffer, M. Silverman, Y. Takahashi, A. Varnik, D. Wasserman, P. Yip, and H. Hendin. 2005. “Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review.” Jama 294(16): 2064-2074. Mental Health, Drugs & Regions Branch, Department of Health, Victorian Government. 2010. “Working with the suicidal person. Clinical practice guidelines for emergency departments and mental health services.” in http://www.health.vic.gov.au/ mentalhealth/suicide/suicidal-person- book2010.pdf. Latest update 12 November 2016. Milner, A. J., G. Carter, J. Pirkis, J. Robinson, and M. J. Spittal. 2015. “Letters, green cards, telephone calls and postcards: systematic and meta-analytic review of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempts and suicide.” The British Journal of Psychiatry 206(3): 184-190. Mishara, B. L., J. Houle, and B. Lavoie. 2005. “Comparison of the Effects of Four Suicide Prevention Programs for Family and Friends of High‐Risk Suicidal Men Who Do Not Seek Help Themselves.” Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 35(3): 329-342. Nam, S. K., S. I. Choi, J. H. Lee, M. K. Lee, A. R. Kim, and S. M. Lee. 2013. “Psychological factors in college students' attitudes toward seeking professional psychological help: A meta-analysis.” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 44(1): 37. Pan, Y. J., W. H. Chang, M. B. Lee, C. H. Chen, S. C. Liao, and E. D. Caine. 2013. “Effectiveness of a nationwide aftercare program for suicide attempters.” Psychological medicine 43(7): 1447-1454. Rabkin, J. G., and E. L. Struening. 1976. “Life events, stress, and illness.” Science 194(4269): 1013-1020. Rickgarn, L. V. R. 1994. Perspectives on College Student Suicide. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Rossi, P. H., M. W. Lipsey, and H. E. Freeman. 2004. Evaluation: A systematic approach. 7th ed. California: Sage Publication. Sadowski, C., and M. L. Kelley. 1993. “Social problem solving in suicidal adolescents.” Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 61(1): 121. Schotte, D. E., and G. A. Clum. 1982. “Suicide ideation in a college population: a test of a model.” Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 50(5): 690-696. Schwarzer, R., and B. Weiner. 1991. “Stigma controllability and coping as predictors of emotions and social support.” Journal of Personal and Social Relationships 8(1): 133-140. Schwarzer, R., and N. Knoll. 2007. “Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview.” International Journal of Psychology 42(4): 243-252. Sexton, L. 1999. “Vicarious traumatisation of counsellors and effects on their workplaces.” British Journal of Guidance and Counselling 27(3): 393-403. Silver, R. C., C. B. Wortman, and C. Crofton. 1990. “The role of coping in support provision: The self-presentational dilemma of victims of life crises.” In Social support: An interactional view, eds. B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, and G. R. Pierce. New York: John Wiley & Sans, 397-426. Tompkins, T. L., J. Witt, and N. Abraibesh. 2010. “Does a gatekeeper suicide prevention program work in a school setting? Evaluating training outcome and moderators of effectiveness.” Suicide and life-threatening behavior 40(5): 506-515. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, The Assessment and Management of Risk for Suicide Working Group. 2013. “VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for assessment and management of patients at risk for suicide.” in http://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/MH/srb/. Latest update 12 November 2016. World Health Organization. 2014. “Preventing suicide: A global imperative”in http://www.who.int/mental_health/suicide-prevention/world_report_2014/en/. Latest update 12 November 2016. Yang, B., and G. A. Clum. 1996. “Effects of early negative life experiences on cognitive functioning and risk for suicide: A review.” Clinical Psychology Review 16(3): 177-195. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59482 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 為了預防及降低自殺行為的發生,我國自殺防治政策分別針對高自殺風險者與全體民眾制定出數項策略,其中作為推動核心的「推展守門人概念」與「關懷訪視」,即是希望鼓勵眾人相互關懷、通報高自殺風險個案,再由自殺關懷訪視員給予專業協助的方式來建立起防護網絡。但策略能否發揮效用,仍須回到個體的層面視之,因為文獻顯示,個體的社會支持程度與壓力因應型態都將影響其面對重大事件所採取的態度與行為,甚至是對外求助的意願。因此,本研究係從社會支持與壓力因應型態的角度出發,藉由質化訪談與方案評估的方式,檢視兩項策略於地方的政策意涵、實施計畫、策略成效、成功的執行經驗以及執行困境,釐清是否所有高自殺風險者都可透過「推展守門人概念」與「關懷訪視」達到增補社會支持的效果?並於最後針對執行困境提出建議。
研究結果發現基隆市與新北市在兩項策略的政策意涵上仍與中央相同,僅實施計畫視地區特性而各有差異。至於策略成效上,「關懷訪視」則較「推展守門人概念」更易發揮增補社會支持的效果,原因在於社會支持低、壓力因應負面者的負面形象降低了周遭他人介入的意願,造成社會支持低、壓力因應負面者較難以從守門人策略中獲取協助的現象。此外,組織協力、守門人訓練不足、案量過重以及訪視標準僵化等缺失也為兩項策略的執行困境,故未來若欲持續發展「推展守門人概念」與「關懷訪視」,則須正視此些問題並加以改善。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The government of Taiwan takes some suicide prevention policies, gatekeeper and aftercare program, for the citizens, especially high-risk population, to decrease the suicide rate and establish a defensive network. Gatekeeper is trying to encourage citizens to concern with each other and to report high suicide risk cases. Following the reporting, aftercare program managers will provide professional assistance for high suicide risk cases. According to the literature review, when human being faces the major life events, their attitude, behavior, and will for seeking help are influenced by their own social support and stress coping style. By in-depth interviews and program evaluation, this study tries to analyzes the two policies in several dimensions, containing policy meaning, implementation plans, policy effectiveness, successful implementation experience and implementation difficulties, in local government. Besides, this study also examines whether high-risk population could obtain social support from gatekeeper or aftercare program.
This research finds that the policy meaning of gatekeeper and aftercare program in Keelung City and New Taipei City still accord with central government, but some implementation plans vary from place to place. In terms of social support, the aftercare program is more effective than gatekeeper. Because it is difficult to gain the help from others when the individuals have negative images which come from low social support and negative stress coping. The individuals who cope with stress negatively are still hard to obtain social support from gatekeeper. Furthermore, gatekeeper and aftercare program also emerge some dilemmas, such as inefficient collaboration, insufficient gatekeeper training, heavy caseload, and rigid visiting stander. If we want to sustainably carry out gatekeeper and aftercare program in the future, we should confront those dilemmas and seek methods to improve them. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:25:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R03343004-1.pdf: 3056091 bytes, checksum: c24d99320e48549a57bbaea71852fd77 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題 4 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 社會支持與壓力因應 7 第二節 壓力因應與自殺 19 第三節 國內目前自殺防治政策 24 第三章 研究設計 33 第一節 研究架構 33 第二節 研究方法 36 第三節 訪談實施與資料分析 42 第四章 研究發現 45 第一節 推展守門人概念之評估 45 第二節 關懷訪視之評估 84 第五章 結論與建議 125 第一節 研究結論 125 第二節 研究建議 134 第三節 研究限制 139 參考文獻 141 附錄:訪談大綱 153 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 從社會支持對壓力因應之影響檢視自殺防治政策 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Review of Suicide Prevention Policy from Social Support Impact on Stress Coping | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 廖興中(Hsin-Chung Liao),陳杏容(Hsing-Jung Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 自殺防治,推展守門人概念,關懷訪視,社會支持,壓力因應, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | suicide prevention,gatekeeper,aftercare program,social support,stress coping, | en |
dc.relation.page | 155 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201700953 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2017-06-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 公共事務研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-106-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.98 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。