請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59198完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃從仁(Tsung-Ren Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Hao Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王翊豪 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T09:17:40Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2022-07-20 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-07-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-07-12 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Apperly, I. A. (2008). Beyond simulation–theory and theory–theory: Why social cognitive neuroscience should use its own concepts to study “Theory of Mind”. Cognition, 107, 266-283.
Bilker, W. B., Hansen, J. A., Brensinger, C. M., Richard, J., Gur, R. E., & Gur, R. C. (2012). Development of abbreviated nine-item forms of the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices Test. Assessment, 19, 354-369. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216. Brüne, M. (2005). “Theory of mind” in schizophrenia: A review of the literature. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31, 21-42. Einstein, A. (2013). Albert Einstein, the human side: Glimpses from his archives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Epley, N., Converse, B. A., Delbosc, A., Monteleone, G. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2009). Believers' estimates of God's beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people's beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 21533-21538. Hackett, C., Connor, P., Stonawski, M., Skirbekk, V., Potancoková, M., & Abel, G. (2015). The future of world religions: Population growth projections, 2010-2050. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Han, S., Mao, L., Gu, X., Zhu, Y., Ge, J., & Ma, Y. (2008). Neural consequences of religious belief on self-referential processing. Social Neuroscience, 3, 1-15. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Henry, J. D., Phillips, L. H., Ruffman, T., & Bailey, P. E. (2013). A meta-analytic review of age differences in theory of mind. Psychology and Aging, 28, 826-839. Ibanez, A., Huepe, D., Gempp, R., Gutiérrez, V., Rivera-Rei, A., & Toledo, M. I. (2013). Empathy, sex and fluid intelligence as predictors of theory of mind. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 616-621. Jeon, I. H., Kim, K. R., Kim, H. H., Park, J. Y., Lee, M., Jo, H. H., ... & Lee, S. Y. (2013). Attributional style in healthy persons: Its association with 'Theory of Mind' Skills. Psychiatry Investigation, 10, 34-40. Krach, S., Paulus, F. M., Bodden, M., & Kircher, T. (2010). The rewarding nature of social interactions. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 22. Lyon, H. M., Kaney, S., & Bentall, R. P. (1994). The defensive function of persecutory delusions. Evidence from attribution tasks. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 637-646. Malle, B. F. (2011). Attribution theories: How people make sense of behavior. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (pp. 72–95). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 711- 747. Nicholson, H. (2016). The spirit of contradiction in Christianity and Buddhism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Peterson, C., & Steen, T. A. (2002). Optimistic explanatory style. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 244–256). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2007). Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: A lesion study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3054-3067. Winters, K. C., & Neale, J. M. (1985). Mania and low self-esteem. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 282-290. Worthington Jr, E. L., Wade, N. G., Hight, T. L., Ripley, J. S., McCullough, M. E., Berry, J. W., …O’Connor, L. (2003). The Religious Commitment Inventory--10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 84-96. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/59198 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 所有的宗教信仰本質上都是一樣的嗎？不同宗教的信徒心靈發展方向是否雷同？為了了解宗教對於信徒的影響，我們從社會心理學的角度出發，比較各兩百名提倡大愛與眾生平等的大乘佛教徒以及追求與上帝連結的基督徒，在文化背景、性別比例、年齡分布、社經地位和流體智力都相似的前提下，兩個宗教群體在社會敏感度以及因果歸因風格顯示出相反的傾向。在社會敏感度上，大乘佛教徒的心智理論能力隨著信仰虔誠度的增加而增加，基督徒則是減少；在歸因風格上，隨著信仰虔誠度的增加，大乘佛教徒的自利歸因謬誤下降，基督徒則相反地增加。這些與宗教相關的社會心理學面向差異暗示了不同的宗教會形塑出不同的思想和行為，並使其信徒們在心靈層面上有相當不同的發展。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Are all religions essentially the same? Are believers of different religions heading in the same mental direction? To answer these questions from a sociopsychological perspective on the effects of religious beliefs, we compared social sensitivity and its closely related causal attribution style between 200 Mahayana Buddhists, who practiced unbiased love and compassion toward every being, and 200 Christians, who followed the path of and pursued union with God. With a similar cultural background, sex ratio, age distribution, socioeconomic status, and fluid intelligence level, Taiwanese Mahayana Buddhists and Christians in our study showed opposite tendencies when inferring mental states of others—As religiosity increased, overall theory of mind increased in Mahayana Buddhists and yet decreased in Christians. Meanwhile, these two religious groups showed opposite tendencies of attributional style—As religiosity increased, self-serving bias decreased in Buddhists and yet increased in Christians. These marked religiosity-dependent, sociopsychological differences between Mahayana Buddhists and Christians suggest that different religions shape mind and behavior differently and can lead their followers towards quite distinct mental directions. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T09:17:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-106-R03227113-1.pdf: 1028992 bytes, checksum: 08c37a220c99f5bfedfe6b2f26263674 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Introduction---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1
Methods-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 Results---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9 Discussion---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------12 References---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------14 Tables--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------18 Figures-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------25 Appendix-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------28 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 自利歸因謬誤 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 基督徒 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 大乘佛教徒 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 心智理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 歸因風格 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | theory of mind | en |
| dc.subject | attributional style | en |
| dc.subject | self-serving bias | en |
| dc.subject | Mahayana Buddhists | en |
| dc.subject | Christians | en |
| dc.title | 透過宗教看人生：大乘佛教徒與基督徒的比較 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Perceiving Self, Others, and Events through a Religious Lens: Mahayana Buddhists vs. Christians | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 范綱華(Gang-Hua Fan),張仁和(Jen-Ho Chang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 心智理論,歸因風格,自利歸因謬誤,大乘佛教徒,基督徒, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | theory of mind,attributional style,self-serving bias,Mahayana Buddhists,Christians, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 35 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201701364 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2017-07-12 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-106-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。