請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58915
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 許如君 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wen-Hsuan Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王文萱 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T08:38:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-05 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-11-05 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-10-14 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 方敏男。1989。不同套袋材質防治瓜實蠅危害苦瓜及絲瓜之研究。台中區農業改良場研究彙報 25:3∼12。
王喻其、王泰權、陳富翔、蔡永勝、李宏萍、費文綺。2012。植物保護手冊。台中,霧峰:農業藥物毒物試驗所。1079 頁。 朱耀沂、魯仲嫈。1987(a)。利用克蠅調查瓜實蠅族群密度可行性之探討(1)羽化日齡、溫度對引誘率之影響。植物保護學會會刊 29:353∼360。 朱耀沂、魯仲嫈。1987(b)。利用克蠅調查瓜實蠅族群密度可行性之探討(2)克蠅的有效距離和瓜實蠅之分散趨勢。植物保護學會會刊 29:361∼369。 呂鳳鳴。1997。瓜實蠅(雙翅目:果實蠅科)產卵之偏好姓(I)寄主果實與顏色。中華昆蟲 17:237∼243。 素木得一。1911。臺灣害蟲目錄。臺灣:臺灣總督府農事試驗場。123 頁。 葉鐵林。2006。化工結晶過程原理及應用。中國,北京:北京工業大學。491 頁。 曾義雄、吳勝信、嚴奉琰。1980。臺灣果實蠅種類調查(一)五種果實蠅引誘劑對果實蠅種類之誘引試驗。科學發展月刊 8: 162∼170。 溫宏治。1985。臺灣南部瓜實蠅之田間生態與誘殺研究。中華農業研究 34: 228∼235。 劉玉章。1989。瓜實蠅引誘劑之利用。中華昆蟲特刊 4:115∼129。 劉玉章、林志祥。1992。10% 克蠅混合液對瓜實蠅之誘殺研究。植物保護學會會刊 34:307∼315。 鄭允、古德業、高靜華、黃毓斌。1996。瓜果實蠅誘殺劑不穩定性研究—乃力松及克蠅之分解作用。中華農業研究 45:422∼435。 Akhtaruzzaman M, Alam MZ, Ali-Sardar MM. 1999. Suppressing fruit fly infestation by bagging cucumber at different days after anthesis. Bangladesh J Entomol 9: 103-112. Alcantara-Licudine JP, Li QX, Kawate MK. 1996. Supercritical fluid extraction of naled, methyl eugenol, and cuelure in soil. J Chromatogr Sci 34: 238-244. Alexander BH, Beroza M, Oda TA, Steiner LF, Miyashita DH, Mitchell WC. 1962. The development of male melon fly attractants. J Agric Food Chem 10: 270-276. Allwood AJ, Vueti ET, Lablanc L, Bull R. 2002. Eradication of introduced Bactrocera species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Nauru using male annihilation and protein bait application techniques. pp 19-25. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN. (eds) Turnig The Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. Proceedings of International Conference on Eradication of Island Invasives. IUCN Publications Services Unit. Cambridge, UK. Atterholt CA, Delwiche MJ, Rice RE, Krochta JM. 1999. Controlled release of insect sex pheromones from paraffin wax and emulsions. J Control Release 57: 233-247. Baker R, Herbert RH, Lomer RA. 1982. Chemical components of the rectal gland secretions of male Dacus cucurbitae, the melon fly. Experientia 38: 232-233. Barry JD, Miller NW, Pinero JC, Tuttle A, Mau RFL, Vargas RI. 2006. Effectiveness of protein baits on melon fly and oriental fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae): Attraction and feeding. J Econ Entomol 99: 1161-1167. Barthel WF, Green N, Keiser I, Steiner LF. 1957. Anisylacetone, synthetic attractant for male melon fly. Science 126: 654. Bautista RC, Harris EJ, Vargas RI, Jang EB. 2004. Parasitization of melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) by Fopius arisanus and Psyttalia fletcheri (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and the effect of fruit substrates on host preference by parasitoids. Biol Control 30: 156-164. Bateman MA. 1972. The ecology of fruit flies. Annu Rev Entomol 17: 493-518. Beroza M, Alexander BH, Steiner LF, Mitchell WC, Miyashita DH. 1960. New synthetic lures for the male melon fly. Science 131: 1044-1045. Bhatia SK, Mahto Y. 1969. Influence of temperature on the speed of development of melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). Indian J Agr Sci 40: 821-828. Boucher JR, Raymond E, Coler R, Hertlein M, Tuttle S, Mafra-Neto A. 2010. Sprayable controlled-release male annihilation technique (MAT) formulation and insect control. US Patent Pub No: 20100216730. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Washington, DC. Burfield DR, Smithers RH. 1982. Drying of grossly wet ether extracts. J Chem Educ 59: 703-704 Burfield DR, Lee K, Smithers RH. 1977. Desiccant efficiency in solvent drying. A reappraisal by application of a novel method for solvent water assay. J Org Chem 42: 3060-3065. Casaña-Giner V, Oliver JE, Jang EB, Carvalho L, Khrimian A, DeMilo B, McQuate GT. 2003. Raspberry ketone formate as an attractant for the melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidea). J Entomol Sci 38: 120-126. Clarke AR, Armstrong KF, Carmichael AE, Milne JR, Raghu S, Roderick GK, Yeates DK. 2005. Invasive phytophagous pests arising through a recent tropical evolutionary radiation: the Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies. Annu Rev Entomol 50: 293-319. Coquillett DW. 1899. A new trypetid from Hawaii. Ent News 10: 129-130. Cunningham RT. 1989. Male annihilation. pp 345-352. In: Robinson AS, Hooper G (eds). Fruit Flies. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elseveir Science Publishers BV. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Cunningham RT, Steiner LF. 1972. Field trail of cue-lure + naled on saturated fiberboard blocks for control of the melon fly by the male-annihilation technique. J Econ Entomol 65: 505-507. Cunningham RT, Suda DY. 1985. Male annihilation of the oriental fruit-fly, Dacus dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae): A new thickener and extender for methyl eugenol formulations. J Econ Entomol 78: 503-504. Cunningham RT, Chambers DL , Steiner LF, Ohinata K. 1975. Thixcin-thickened sprays of cue-lure + naled: Investigation of rates of application for use in male annihilation of melon fly. J Econ Entomol 68: 857-860. Dhillon MK, Singh R, Naresh JS, Sharma HC. 2005. The melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae: A review of its biology and management. J Insect Sci 5: 40-55. Drew RAI. 1974. The responses of fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the South Pacific area to male attractants. J Aust Entomol Soc 13: 267-270. Elsayed AM, Suckling DM, Byers JA, Jang EB, Wearing CH. 2009. Potential of “lure and kill” in long-term pest management and eradication of invasive species. J Econ Entomol 102: 815-835. Fletcher BS. 1987. The biology of Dacine fruit flies. Annu Rev Entomol 32: 115-144. Garside J. 1971. The concept of effectiveness factors in crystal growth. Chem Eng Sci 26: 1425-1431. Harris EJ, Bautista RC. 1996. Effects of fruit fly host, fruit species, and host egg to female parasitoid ratio on the laboratory rearing of Biosteres arisanus. Entomol Exp Appl 79: 187-194. Harris EJ, Nakagawa S, Urago T. 1971. Sticky traps for detection and survey of three tephritids. J Econ Entomol 64: 62-62. Henry HP, Severin PD, Harry C, Severin MA, William J, Hartung BS. 1914. The ravages, life history, weights of stages, natural enemies and methods of control of the melon fly (Dacus Cucurbitae Coq.). Ann Entomol Soc Am 7: 177-212. Hixson AW, Knox KL. 1951. Effect of agitation on rate of growth of single crystals. Ind Eng Chem 43: 2144-2151. Huang TC, Cheng EY, Kao CH, Hwang YB, Chiang MY. 2005. Area-wide control of oriental fruit fly and melon fly in Taiwan. pp 147-154. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Taiwan-American Agricultural Cooperative Projects. Agricultural Research Institute, Council of Agriculture. Wufeng, Taichung, Taiwan. Indu B, Ernst WR, Gelbaumgo LT. 1993. Methanol-formic acid esterification equilibrium in sulfuric acid solutions: influence of sodium salts. Ind Eng Chem Res 32: 981-985. Iwaizumi R, Saeki M, Hashimoto H. 1989. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the suppression control of the melon fly Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett Diptera Tephritidae using cue-lure toxicant in the field. Res Bull Plant Prot 25: 43-46. Jacobson M, Beroza M. 1963. Chemical insect attractants: Insects promote their own destruction in responding to traps baited with specific lures. Science 140: 1367-1373. Jang EB. 2011. Effectiveness of plastic matrix lures and traps against Bactrocera dorsalis and Bactrocera cucurbitae in Hawaii. J Appl Entomol 135: 456-466. Jang EB, Casaña-Giner V, Oliver JE. 2007. Field captures of wild melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) with an improved male attractant, raspberry ketone formate. J Econ Entomol 100: 1124-1128. Johnson LR, Egli PH. 1957. Factors that control growth of crystals from solution. Acta Crystallogr 10: 838. Kahlweit M. 1970. On the dendritic growth of NH4Cl crystals from aqueous solutions. J Crystal Growth 7: 74-78. Keiser I, Jacobson M, Naragawa S, Miyashita DH, Harris EJ. 1976. Mediterranean fruit fly: Attraction of female to acetic acid and acetic anhydride, to two chemical intermediates in the manufacture of cue-lure, and to decaying Hawaiian tephritids. J Econ Entomol 69: 517-520. Keiser I, Nakagawa S, Kobayashi RM, Chambers DL, Urago T, Doolittle RE. 1973. Attractiveness of cue-lure and the degradation product 4-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-2-butanone to male melon flies in the field in Hawaii. J Econ Entomol 66: 112-114. Khan L, Inayatullah C, Manzoor-ul-Haq. 1992.Control of melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Trypetidae) on melon in Pakistan. Trop Pest Manage 38: 261-264. Klungness LM, Jang EB, Mau RFL, Vargas RI, Sugano JS, Fujitani E. 2005. New sanitation techniques for controlling Tephritid fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. J Appl Sci Environ Mgt 9: 5-14. Koyama J, Kakinohana H, Miyatake T. 2004. Eradication of the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae, in Japan: Importance of behavior, ecology, genetics, and evolution. Annu Rev Entomol 49: 331-349. LaChance LE, Riemann JG. 1964. Cytogenetic investigations on radiation and chemically induced dominant lethal mutations in oocytes and sperm of the screwworm fly. Mutation Research 1: 318-333. Lall BS, Sinha SN. 1959. On the biology of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae (Coq.) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Sci Cult 25: 159-161. Leblanc L, Vargas RI, Mackey B, Putoa R, Pinero JC. 2011. Evaluation of cue-lure and methyl eugenol solid lure and insecticide dispensers for fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) monitoring and control in Tahiti. Fla Entomol 94: 510-516. Lieb LM, Nash RA, Matias JR, Orentreich N. 1988. A new in vitro method for transepidermal water loss: A possible method for moisturizer evaluation. J Soc Cosmet Chem 39: 107-119. Lin CH, Falk RH, Stocking CR. 1977. Rapid chemical dehydration of plant material for light and electron microscopy with 2, 2-dimethoxypropane and 2, 2-diethoxypropane. Amer J Bot 64: 602-605. Liquido NJ. 1991. Fruit on ground as a reservoir of resident melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) populations in papaya orchards. Environ Entomol 20: 620-625. Malowicki SMM, Martin R, Qian MC. 2008. Volatile composition in raspberry cultivars grown in the Pacific Northwest determined by stir bar sorptive extraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem 56: 4128-4133. Martin T, Assogba-Komlan F, Houndete T, Hougard JM, Chandre F. 2006. Efficacy of mosquito netting for sustainable small holders’ cabbage production in Africa. J Econ Entomol 99: 450-454. Matsui M, Nakamori H, Kohama T, Nagamine Y. 1990. The effect of male annihilation on a population of wild melon flies Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett Diptera Tephritidae in Northern Okinawa Japan. Jpn J Appl Ent Zool 34: 315-317. McPhail M. 1937. Relation of time of day, temperature and evaporation to attractiveness of fermenting sugar solution to Mexican fruit fly. J Econ Entomol 30: 793-799. Metcalf RL. 1990. Chemical ecology of dacinae fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 83: 1017-1030. Metcalf RL, Metcalf ER. 1992. Fruit flies of family Tephritidae. pp 109-152. In: Metcalf RL, Metcalf ER (eds). Plant Kairomones in Insect Ecology and Control. Chapman and Hall, New York and London. Mwatawala M, Maerere AP, Makundi R, DeMeyer M. 2010. Incidence and host range of the melon fruit fly Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Central Tanzania. Int J Pest Manage 56: 265-273 Nishida T, Bess HA. 1950. Applied ecology in melon fly control. J Econ Entomol 43: 877-883. Nishida T, Haramoto F. 1953. Immunity of Dacus cucurbitae to attack by certain parasites of Dacus drosalis. J Econ Entomol 46: 61-64. Nishida T, Iwahashi O, Tan KH. 1993. Accumulation of Dendrobium superbum (Orchidaceae) fragrance in the rectal glands by males of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae. J Chem Ecol 19: 713-722. Oliver JE, Casaña-Giner V, Jang EB, McQuate GT, Carvalho L. 2004. Improved attractants for the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae. pp 283-290. In: Barnes BN (ed). Proceedings of 6th international fruit fly symposium. Stellenbosch, South Africa. Oliveira PR, Becharab GH, Denardia SE, Oliveira RJ, Mathiasa MIC. 2012. Genotoxic and mutagenic effects of fipronil on mice. Exp Toxicol Pathol 64: 569-573. Paul R, Kende AS. 1964. Mechanism for the N,N'-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide-caused dehydration of asparagine and maleamic acid derivatives. J Am Chem Soc 86: 4162-4166. Payne TL, Shorey HH, Gaston LK. 1973. Sex pheromones of Lepidoptera. XXXVIII. Electroantennogram responses in Autographa californica to cis-7-dodecenyl acetate and related compounds. Ann Entomol Soc Am 66: 703-704. Purcell MF, Stark JD, Messing RH. 1994. Insecticide effect on three Tephritid fruit flies and associated Bracnoid parasitoids in Hawaii. J Econ Entomol 87: 1455-1462. Raghu S. 2004. Functional significance of phytochemical lures to Dacine fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): An ecological and evolutionary synthesis. Bull Entomol Res 94: 385-399. Renou M, Guerrero A. 2000. Insect parapheromones in olfaction research and semiochemical-based pest control strategies. Annu Rev Entomol 48: 605-630. Ryckewaert P, Deguine JP, Brevault T, Vayssieres JF. 2010. Fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) on vegetable crops in Reunion Island (Indian Ocean): State of knowledge, control methods and prospects for management. Fruits 65: 113-130. Scott A. 2004. France bans BASF’s fipronil insecticide. Chemical Week 166: 15. Shelly TE. 2000. Effects of raspberry ketone on the mating success of male melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Proc Hawaiian Entomol Soc 34: 143-147. Shelly TE. 2010. Effects of methyl eugenol and raspberry ketone/cue lure on the sexual behavior of Bactrocera species (Diptera: Tephritidae). Appl Entomol Zool 45: 349-361. Shelly TE, Nishimoto J. 2011. Additional measurements of distance-dependent capture probabilities for released males of Bactrocera cucurbitae and B. dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Honolulu. J Asia Pacific Entomol 14: 271-276. Shelly TE, Villalobos EM. 1995. Cuelure and the mating behavior of male melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla Entomol 78: 473-482. Shelly TE, Kurashima RS, Nishimoto JI. 2012a. Field capture of male melon flies, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett), in Jackson traps baited with cue-lure versus raspberry ketone formate in Hawaii. pp 63-70. In: Kirkaldy GW, Swezey OH (eds). Proceedings of the Hawaiian entomological society 44. Hawaiian Entomological Society, Honolulu, Hawaii. Shelly TE, Nishimoto JI, Kurashima RS. 2012b. Trap capture of three economically important fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae): Evaluation of a solid formulation containing multiple male lures in a Hawaiian coffee field. J Econ Entomol 105: 1186-1193. Shelly TE, Nishimoto JI, Diaz A, Leathers J, War M, Shoemaker R, Al-Zubaidy M, Joseph D. 2010. Capture probability of released males of two Bactrocera species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in detection traps in California. J Econ Entomol 103: 2042-2051. Sivinski JM, Calkins C. 1986. Pheromones and parapheromones in the control of Tephritids. Fla Entomol 69: 157-168. Steiner LF. 1957. Low-cost plastic fruit fly trap. J Econ Entomol 50: 509-509. Steiner LF, Lee RKS. 1955. Large-area tests of a male-annihilation method for oriental fruit fly control. J Econ Entomol 48: 311-317. Tan KH, Nishida R. 1995. Incorporation of raspberry ketone in the rectal glands of males of the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni Froggatt (Diptera: Tephritidae). Appl Entomol Zool 30: 494 -497. Taniguchi M, Nakamori H, Kakinohana H, Yogi Y, Zukeyama H. 1988. Suppression of male melon fly Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae) populations using cotton ropes infiltrated with a lure-toxicant. Jpn J Appl Ent Zool 32: 126-128. Vargas RI, Jang EB, Klungness LM. 2003a. Area-wide pest management of fruit flies in Hawaiian fruits and vegetables. Proceedings of the Research Institute of the Subtropics Meeting on Fruit Flies: 37-46. Vargas RI, Miller NW, Stark JD. 2003b. Field trials of spinosad as a replacement for naled, DDVP, and malathion in methyl eugenol and cue-lure bucket traps to attract and kill male oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. J Econ Entomol 96: 1780-1785. Vargas RI, Shelly TE, Leblanc L, Pinero JC. 2010a. Recent advances in methyl eugenol and cue-lure technologies for fruit fly detection, monitoring, and control in Hawaii. Vitam Horm 83: 575-595. Vargas RI, Stark JD, Mackey B, Bull R. 2005. Weathering trials of Amulet cue-lure and Amulet methyl eugenol 'attract-and-kill' stations with male melon flies and oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. J Econ Entomol 98: 1551-1559. Vargas RI, Stark JD, Uchida GK, Purcell M. 1993. Opiine parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) of oriental fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Kauai Island, Hawaii: Islandwide relative abundance and parasitis rates in wild and orchard guava habitats. Environ Entomol 22: 246-253. Vargas RI, Mau RFL, Jang EB, Faust RM, Wong L. 2008a. The Hawaii fruit fly areawide pest management program. pp 300-325. In: Koul O, Cuperus GW, Elliott NC (eds). Areawide Pest Management: Theory to Implementation. CABI Books, London. Vargas RI, Stark JD, Kido MH, Ketter HM,Whitehand LC. 2000. Methyl eugenol and cue-lure traps for suppression of male oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera : Tephritidae) in Hawaii: Effects of lure mixtures and weathering. J Econ Entomol 93: 81-87. Vargas RI, Burns RE, Mau RFL, Stark JD, Cook P, Pinero JC. 2009. Captures in methyl eugenol and cue-lure detection traps with and without insecticides and with a Farma Tech solid lure and insecticide dispenser. J Econ Entomol 102: 552-557. Vargas RI, Mau RFL, Stark JD, Pinero JC, Leblanc L, Souder SK. 2010b. Evaluation of methyl eugenol and cue-lure traps with solid lure and insecticide dispensers for fruit fly monitoring and male annihilation in the Hawaii Areawide Pest Management Program. J Econ Entomol 103: 409-415. Vargas RI, Stark JD, Hertlein M, Neto AM, Coler R, Pinero JC. 2008b. Evaluation of SPLAT with spinosad and methyl eugenol or cue-lure for 'attract-and-kill' of oriental and melon fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. J Econ Entomol 101: 759-768. Vargas RI, Pinero JC, Jang EB, Mau RFL, Stark JD, Gomez L, Stoltman L, Mafra-Neto A. 2010c. Response of melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) to weathered SPLAT-spinosad-cue-lure. J Econ Entomol 103: 1594-1602. Wee SL, Shelly TE. 2013. Capture of Bactrocera fruit flies in traps baited with liquid versus solid formulations of male lures in Malaysia. J Asia Pacific Entomol 16: 37-42. White J, Cook PJ, Nkomo JE, Gudz NG. 2011. Multi-component insect attractant. US Patent Pub No: 20110290909. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Wong TTY, Cunningham RT, Mcinnis DO, Gilmore JE. 1989. Seasonal distribution and abundance of Dacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Rota, commonwealth of the Mariana Islands. Environ Entomol 18: 1079-1082. Wong TTY, McInnis DO, Ramadan MM, Nishimoto JI. 1991. Age-related response of male melon flies Dacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) to cue-lure. J Chem Ecol 17: 2481-2487. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58915 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 瓜實蠅 [melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett)] 為葫蘆科作物之重要害蟲,目前在台灣主要使用克蠅 (cuelure) 做為誘引防治資材,但部份文獻指出其有效距離及田間誘殺效能皆未臻理想,故本研究針對另一誘雄物質 raspberry ketone formate (RKF) 進行誘引效能測試及安定性改良。效能評估部分以網籠試驗測試 1、5、10 及 20 日齡雄蟲之被誘引率,結果顯示兩誘引劑於各日齡之誘捕率間無顯著差異,且 24 小時內對未性成熟雄蟲之誘捕率即高於 50%;另標放再捕試驗第 3 天之結果中,於 5、10、20 及 25 m 距離下 RKF 之回捕率均顯著優於克蠅,但至試驗第 7 天時僅於 5 m 及 20 m 距離下具顯著差異。RKF 水解特性探討部分,利用水分滴定儀及高效液相層析儀分析含水量及純度變化,結果指出添加水分含量與樣品靜置室溫 7 天後之 RKF 含量成負相關,而與 RKF 之分解產物覆盆子酮含量成正相關;水解產生之不純物則以網籠試驗進行測試,結果顯示添加 0.1、1、2 及 4% (w/w) 之甲酸或乙酸,對 RKF 及克蠅的誘引效果無顯著影響。安定性提升方面,添加乾燥劑或脫水劑後進行加速儲藏試驗以測試安定效果,結果顯示於閉瓶環境下對安定性無明顯助益;而以開瓶老化試驗測試添加植物油保護劑後 RKF 之分解情形,顯示 10% 及 5% RKF 配方之分解率明顯降低,且可保持 12 週無結晶狀態。田間試驗結果則顯示,10% RKF 植物油安定配方於 8 週試驗期間內之誘引效能顯著高於 50% RKF 及無添加植物油之克蠅與 RKF,但於競爭試驗中與 5% RKF 間則無顯著差異。綜合以上研究結果,RKF 於25 m 釋放距離下之誘殺能力可達克蠅的 1.3 倍,且對性成熟前之雄蟲可產生誘引反應,而經過植物油調配後,可延長誘殺劑使用壽命避免產生結晶、穩定誘引效果並降低 RKF 使用量,具有應用於田間防治作業之價值。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett), is an invasive pest of Cucurbitaceae crops worldwide. Currently, cuelure is the main attractant used for male melon flies in attract-and-kill bait traps in Taiwan. However, some studies have indicated that the effective distance and the control efficiency of cuelure to melon flies are not good enough. In order to improve the effectiveness of control programs, the efficacy evaluation and stability elevation of another male lure, raspberry ketone formate (RKF), for melon fly will be studied here. For the efficacy evaluation experiments, rates of melon fly captured in cage experiments were above 50% at 24 hours before the flies had sexually matured, and there were no significant differences among the capture rates of 1, 5, 10, and 20 day-old flies for cuelure or RKF. The results of the mark-release-recapture experiment showed that RKF had a higher accumulated recapture rate on the 3rd day than cuelure at released distances of 5, 10, 20, and 25 m, but the differentiation of capture rates at each released distance were reduced on the 7th day. Investigation of the hydrolytic properties of RKF using moisture and purity analysis showed that, the water content of RKF samples could promote RKF hydrolysis. In addition, when hydrolytic products formic acids and acetic acids were added into RKF and cuelure individually, the results showed no negative effects on capture efficiency at concentrations of 0.1, 1, 2, and 4%. For the stability elevation experiments, adding desiccants showed no significant effects on reducing RKF degradation by accelerated storage method. Nevertheless, adding plant oil could inhibit the crystallization and RKF degradation over the course of 12 weeks, when the proportion of RKF in samples were 5% and 10%. Finally, the RKF formulation at 10% concentration presented the highest effectiveness of those treatments during the 8-week field test. To conclude, the results of the study showed that RKF had higher efficacy than cuelure over long distances, and both lures presented attractiveness to newly emerged male melon flies. Moreover, the longevity, attractive effectiveness, and economic efficiency could be elevated by adding plant oil. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T08:38:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R00645008-1.pdf: 1365677 bytes, checksum: 671d9dfadc14eea5c1be2be54c859a7a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目錄 vii 表次 viii 圖次 ix 壹、前言 1 貳、前人文獻探討 3 一、瓜實蠅分類、分布及生態特性 3 二、瓜實蠅防治方法概述 4 三、滅雄技術於瓜實蠅防治之應用 8 四、瓜實蠅雄性誘引物質簡介 10 五、瓜實蠅雄性誘引物質劑型發展 12 參、材料與方法 15 一、供試昆蟲來源及飼養 15 二、供試誘引劑來源、合成及分析方法 15 三、克蠅及 RKF 誘引效力評估 15 四、RKF 水解特性及不純物影響探討 17 五、RKF 安定性改良測試 18 六、田間試驗 20 七、統計分析 21 肆、結果 24 一、克蠅及 RKF 誘引效力評估 24 二、RKF 水解特性及不純物影響探討 26 三、RKF 安定性改良測試 27 四、田間試驗 29 伍、討論 31 一、克蠅及 RKF 誘引效力評估 31 二、RKF 水解特性及不純物影響探討 34 三、RKF 安定性改良測試 36 四、田間試驗 39 陸、結論 65 柒、參考文獻 68 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 覆盆子酮衍生物對瓜實蠅之誘引效力評估及安定性改良 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Efficacy Evaluation and Stability Improvement of Raspberry Ketone Formate for Melon Flies (Bactrocera cucurbitae) | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 馮海東 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 莊益源,張念台,黃莉欣 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 覆盆子酮衍生物,克蠅,滅雄防治技術,瓜實蠅,劑型改良, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | raspberry ketone formate (RKF),cuelure,male annihilation technique,melon fly (Bactrocera cucurbitae),formulation improvement, | en |
dc.relation.page | 79 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-10-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 植物醫學碩士學位學程 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 植物醫學碩士學位學程 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.33 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。