請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5883
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳先琪(Shian-Chee Wu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yun-Jie Lai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 賴允傑 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-16T16:18:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-25 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-16T16:18:01Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2013-08-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2013-08-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 中央日報,1982,臺金排放廢氣造成嚴重污染監院決另派委員調查,中央日報71年4月17日第六版。
2. 中央氣象局,2013,中央氣象局網頁,www.cwb.gov.tw。 3. 王宏韜,1983,金銀銅鑛業–冶煉與加工,臺灣鑛業史續一冊(民國53-68年),pp.436-438。 4. 台灣電力股份有限公司,1994,原台金舊煉銅廠煙道含砷化物等最佳處理方案規劃報告。 5. 台灣電力股份有限公司,2006,原台金公司濂洞煉銅廠遺留三條廢煙道之環境影響與人體健康風險評估作業計畫期末報告。 6. 台灣糖業股份有限公司,2012,「原台灣金屬鑛業股份有限公司及其所屬三條廢煙道地區(部分)土壤及地下水污染控制場址」污染控制計畫書(修正稿)。 7. 朱昌宇、黄道友、朱奇宏、胡承孝、劉守龍、曹曉玲、任雪菲,2012,模擬降雨條件下污染土壤中重金屬元素徑流遷移特徵,水土保持學報26:49-53。 8. 行政院環境保護署,2010a,98-99年度土壤及地下水污染事件應變調查、查證及技術支援工作計畫期末報告(EPA-98-GA102-03-A205)-9803案台北縣原台金舊煉銅廠三條廢煙道附近地區土壤污染查證報告。 9. 行政院環境保護署,2010b,廢棄工廠土壤及地下水污染潛勢第四期調查計畫(乙)(EPA-98-GA10-03-A075之2)-98-40台灣金屬鑛業股份有限公司調查成果(調查工廠代碼230026)。 10. 行政院農業委員會水土保持局、中華水土保持學會,2005,水土保持手冊。 11. 周亮九,1973,銅的冶煉方法(上),鑛冶17:54-60。 12. 林俐玲,2010,通用土壤流失公式(USLE)之應用與誤用,水保技術5:119-121。 13. 金翁正,1996,金瓜石-濂洞溪砷的來源傳輸過程和去處,國立臺灣大學海洋研究所碩士論文。 14. 施堅仁,2003,含砷有害塵灰固化處理程序之探討,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所博士論文。 15. 財政部國有財產局、新北市政府、新北市瑞芳區公所、台灣糖業股份有限公司、台灣電力股份有限公司,2011,「原台灣金屬鑛業股份有限公司及其所屬三條廢煙道地區(部分)土壤及地下水污染控制場址」健康風險評估報告(定稿本)。 16. 基隆市環境保護局,2012,101年度台灣北部海域環境品質調查監測及海洋垃圾調查計畫。 17. 國家實驗研究院台灣颱風洪水研究中心,2013,大氣研究資料庫,dbar.ttfri.narl.org.tw。 18. 陳垚,1977,台灣煉銅工業,鑛冶21:14-21。 19. 陳敏祥、劉進金,2012,不同坡度演算法對坡地可開發面積之影響-以新店地區為例,2012台灣地理資訊學會年會暨學術研討會論文集A7-4。 20. 新北市政府環境保護局(原臺北縣政府環境保護局),2010a,99年3月26日北環水字第0990017708號公告。 21. 新北市政府環境保護局(原臺北縣政府環境保護局),2010b,99年4月9日北環水字第0990028943號公告。 22. 楊高宏,2002,金瓜石酸礦水中亞鐵氧化行為之硏究,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所碩士論文。 23. 經濟部水利署,2012,中華民國一○○年臺灣水文年報。 24. 經濟部國營事業委員會,1995,水湳洞地區酸鑛水整治可行性研究計畫報告書。 25. 趙澤宏,1970,煉銅廠對環境會發生什麼污染?,鑛冶14:76-83。 26. 簡耀鴻、張東炯、王兆印,2008,在不同空間解析度的DEM提取坡度的研究-以烏山頭水庫地區為例,農業工程學報54:1-8。 27. 蘇紹瑋、陳尊賢,2009,現行土壤砷全量檢測方法之檢討與替代方法之可行性評估,2009 環境分析化學研討會大會手冊,Poster-54。 28. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). 2007. Toxicological Profile for Arsenic. U.S. department of health and human services. Atlanta, Georgia. 29. Burrough, P.A. and R.A. McDonell. 1998. Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press. New York. p.190. 30. ESRI Inc. 2011. ArcGIS Desktop 9.3 Help-how slope works. <http://webhelp.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/9.3/index.cfm?TopicName=How%20Slope%20works> (June. 20, 2013). 31. Gardner, W.H. 1986. Water content. pp.493-544. In Klute, A., G.S. Campell, R.D. Jackson, M.M. Mortland, and D.R. Nielsen (ed.) Methods of soil analysis, Part 1. 2nd ed. ASA and SSSA. Madison, WI, USA. 32. Hickey, R. 2000. Slope angle and slope length solutions for GIS. Cartography 29:1-8. 33. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). 2012. A review of human carcinogens: Arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum, vol. 100C. Lyon, France. 34. Khosrowpanah, S., L. Heitz, Y. Wen, and M. Park. 2007. Developing a GIS-based soil erosion potential model of the Ugum watershed. Technical report No. 117. Water Environmental Research Institute of the Western Pacfic. University of Guam. 35. Krause E. and V.A. Ettel, 1989. Solubilities and stabilities of ferric arsenate compounds. Hydrometallurgy 22:311-337. 36. Larios, R., R. Fernandez-Martinez, and I. Rucandio. 2012. Comparison of three sequential extraction procedures for fractionation of arsenic from highly polluted mining sediments. Anal Bioanal Chem 402:2909-2921. 37. Larios, R., R. Fernandez-Martinez, R. Alvarez, and I. Rucandio. 2012. Arsenic pollution and fractionation in sediments and mine waste samples from different mine sites. Sci Total Environ 431:426-435. 38. Manful G. 1992. Occurrence and ecochemical behaviour of arsenic in a goldsmelter impacted area in Ghana. PhD Thesis. Centrum voor milieusaneringen aan de RUG, University of Gent, Belgium 39. Matera, V., I. Le Hecho, A. Laboudigue, P. Thomas, S. Tellier, and M. Astruc. 2003. A methodological approach for the identification of arsenic bearing phases in polluted soils. Environ Pollut 126:51-64. 40. McDowell, R.W. 2010. Is cadmium loss in surface runoff significant for soil and surface water quality: a study of flood-irrigated pastures? Water. Air and Soil Pollution 209:133-142. 41. Meharg, A.A. and M.M. Rahman. 2003. Arsenic contamination of Bangladesh paddy field soils: Implication for rice contribution to arsenic consumption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37:229-234. 42. Meunier, L., S.R. Walker, J. Wragg, M.B. Parsons, I. Koch, H.E. Jamieson, and K.J. Reimer. 2010. Effects of soil composition and mineralogy on the bioaccessibility of arsenic from tailings and soil in gold mine districts of Nova Scotia. Environ. Sci Technol. 44: 2667-2674. 43. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). 2003. Certificate of analysis, Standard Reference MaterialR 2710– Montana Soil, Highly elevated trace element concentrations. Gaithersburg, MD. 44. Quinton, J.N. and J.A. Catt. 2007. Enrichment of heavy metals in sediment resulting from soil erosion on agricultural fields. Environmental Science and Technology 41:3495-3500. 45. Renard, K.G., G.R. Foster, D.K. McCool, and D.C. Yoder. 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with the revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). USDA Agricultural Handbook 703. 46. Shih, C. J., and C. F. Lin. 2003. Arsenic contaminated site at an abandoned copper smelter plant: waste characterization and solidification/stabilization treatment. Chemosphere 53:691-703. 47. Smedley, P.L. and D.G. Kinniburgh. 2002. A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Applied Geochemistry 17:517-568. 48. Tessier, A., P.G.C. Campbell and M. Bisson. 1979. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particular trace metals. Anal. Chem. 51:844-851. 49. Thomas, G.W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. pp.475-490. In Sparks, D.L., A.L. Page, P.A. Helmke, R.H. Loeppert, P.N. Soltanpour, M.A. Tabatabai, C.T. Johnston, and M.E. Sumner (ed.) Methods of soil analysis, Part 3. ASA and SSSA. Madison, WI, USA. 50. Ure, A. M., P. Quevauviller, H. Muntau and B. Griepink. 1993. Speciation of heavy metals in soils and sediments. An account of the improvement and harmonization of extraction techniques undertaken under the auspices of the BCR of the commission of the European Communities. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 51:135-151. 51. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1998. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) <http://www.epa.gov/IRIS/> (June. 20, 2013). 52. Van Remortel, R.D., M.E. Hamilton, and R.J. Hickey. 2001. Estimating the LS factor for RUSLE through iterative slope length processing of digital elevation data within ArcInfo Grid. Cartography 30:27-35. 53. Van Remortel, R.D., R.W. Maichle, and R.J. Hickey. 2004a. Computing the LS factor for the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation through array-based slope processing of digital elevation data using C++ executable. Computers & Geosciences 30:1043-1053. 54. Van Remortel, R.D., R.W. Maichle, and R.J. Hickey, 2004b. Computing the LS factor for the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation through array-based slope processing of digital elevation data using a C++ executable [Software]. <Available from http://iamg.org/index.php/publisher/articleview/frmArticleID/107> (June. 20, 2013). 55. Vaughan, D.J. 2006. Arsenic. Elements 2:71-75. 56. Wenzel, W.W., N. Kirchbaumer, T. Prohaska, G. Stingeder, E. Lombi, and D.C. Adriano. 2001. Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure. Anal. Chim. Acta. 436:309-323. 57. Wischmeier, W.H., and D.D. Smith. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses - a guide to conservation planning. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 537. 58. Zelanoa, I., Y. Sivrya, C. Quantinc, A. Gelaberta, M. Tharauda, D. Jouvinc, E. Montarges-Pelletierd, J. Garniere, R. Pichonc, S. Nowakf, S. Miskac, O. Abollinob, and M.F. Benedettia. 2013. Colloids and suspended particulate matters influence on Ni availability in surface waters of impacted ultramafic systems in Brazil. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. (In Press) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/5883 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 原台灣金屬鑛業公司濂洞煉銅廠所屬三條廢煙道已於露天環境下破損棄置近40年,且經分析確認殘存於廢煙道內之煙道碴與煙道周邊受污染土壤均含有高濃度之砷,然該區域歷年之環境影響調查均未評估污染物可能受土壤沖蝕及地表逕流影響下之污染情形,以及對承受水體之影響。本研究以序列萃取方式探討現場廢煙道內及附近之土壤中砷之化學型態特徵,運用地理資訊系統軟體及通用土壤流失公式估算區域之地表逕流量及土壤流失量,進而推估地表逕流中之砷濃度,最後則以研究區域採集之水樣砷濃度比較承受水體影響程度推估結果。以Wenzel序列萃取法分析煙道碴及受污染土壤砷濃度之結果顯示,70%以上之總砷含量均屬無定形與結晶性水合鐵鋁氧化物之結合態,3∼30%為樣品表層之特異性或非特異性吸附態,殘餘態之比例僅佔1∼5%。根據BCR序列萃取法醋酸萃取砷濃度結果顯示具移動性或潛在環境危害之砷含量最高應不超過總量之30%,並隨風化程度由低至高遞減。廢煙道周邊地區受污染範圍約25.8公頃,利用地理資訊系統軟體空間分析功能及通用土壤流失公式估算每年每公頃之土壤流失量約為95公噸,換算污染區全區每年平均流失2,400噸土壤,其中83%流入濂洞溪流域,其餘則流入濂洞煉銅廠或樂利橋集水區。經模擬推估污染區每年因土壤流失所輸出之含砷污染物總量約為5.4公噸,以土壤平均濃度推估地表逕流中砷濃度平均值最高約為3.11 mg/L,與所屬集水區內未受污染之地表逕流匯流後會增加承受水體砷濃度1.28 mg/L。於廢煙道周邊實測採集之地表逕流水樣砷濃度值為1.5 mg/L,有煙道之集水(污)區地表逕流砷濃度平均值則介於0.2∼0.5 mg/L,由於水樣中砷濃度多為溶解態,應為煙道碴及受污染土壤於酸性環境下溶解釋出之砷,由雨水挾帶於土壤表面漫流或入滲至土層中以中間流之型式流出之地表逕流,與依據土壤沖蝕量推估產生之顆粒態砷濃度不同,故不合適以模式推算之濃度值直接比較。本研究之結果說明煙道碴及受污染土壤因風化程度不同以致砷濃度相態分佈之差異性,詳細估算廢煙道周邊地區受污染土壤沖蝕情形以及污染物輸出量,以及綜合探討地表逕流對承受水體之影響,可提供此污染區環境危害評估及風險管理之參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | There are three 40-years-old wasted gas tunnels in the abandoned Taiwan Metal Mining Corporation (TMMC) complex in Chinkuashih, New Taipei City, Taiwan. It was found that the residue in the gas tunnels or the soil near the tunnels contained high concentration of arsenic. However, in the field survey and pollution impact assessment conducted in the past, the impact on the water quality of receiving waters by soil erosion or surface runoff was not assessed. In this study, sequential extraction was used to characterize the speciation of arsenic in soils, the surface runoff and soil loss quantity were estimated with the assist of global information system (GIS) and universal soil loss equation (USLE), and the arsenic concentration in the surface runoff was estimated. Surface runoff and receiving water in the study area were also collected and analyzed to compare to the simulation results. The results of the sequential extraction analyses indicate that more than 70% of arsenic is in the forms of amorphous and crystalline hydrous Fe/Al bound speciation, 3 to 30% is non-specific or specific bound arsenic speciation on the sample surface, only 1 to 5 % is residual form in the waste and soil samples. According to the results of BCR sequential extraction, no more than 30% of arsenic can be regarded as the most easily mobilizable arsenic fraction from acetic acid extraction procedure, and is lower for samples subject to longer weathering time. The total contaminated land in this site is estimated about 25.8 hectare. 95 tons of soil is lost per hectare per year, that is 2,400 tons of polluted soil lost for this contaminated site estimated by GIS and USLE calculation. The loading of arsenic from soil erosion is about 5.4 tons each year. The predicted arsenic concentration in the surface runoff would be 3.11 mg/L in the polluted area, and be diluted to 1.28 mg/L with non-polluted surface runoff from the catchment. Arsenic concentration of surface water runoff collected near waste gas tunnels is 1.5 mg/L, whereas the average concentration is only 0.2 to 0.5 mg/L for the contaminated catchment. Most of the arsenic in the water sample is in dissolved form, which might be released from the gas tunnels waste and polluted soil due to acidic leachate, then entrained by surface water flows or intermediate flow downgradient. The dissolved load contributes more to the arsenic concentration in the receiving waters than the particulate arsenic from the soil impacted by raindrops and mobilized by surface water runoff. The USLE is not suitable to estimate the concentration of arsenic in runoff in very acidic soil condition as the soil in this site. Therefore, it is not suitable to compare the arsenic concentration of water samples directly to the simulation results. The arsenic speciation of gas tunnel waste and polluted soils with different weathering condition were revealed. The amount of soil eroded and pollutants exported from the polluted area have been investigated and the impact of surface runoff near wasted gas tunnels on the water quality of receiving waters was estimated. The results can provide valuable information for the environmental hazardous assessment and risk management of this contaminated abandoned copper mine and refinery site in Chinkuashih, Taiwan. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-16T16:18:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-P99541202-1.pdf: 24610797 bytes, checksum: 9e963094e2c3fb1f6e56abe0e7e7c8ad (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
頁碼 中文摘要………………………………………………………….….…...……………Ι 英文摘要………………………………………………………….….…...……………Ⅲ 目錄…………………………………………………………….…….…...……………Ⅴ 圖目錄………………………………………………………………….....……………Ⅶ 表目錄…………………………………………………………………….……………Ⅸ 第一章 前言 1.1 研究緣起………………………………………………………………………1 1.2 研究目的………………………………………………………………………1 第二章 文獻回顧 2.1 研究區域環境背景資料………………………………………………………2 2.2 原台金公司濂洞煉銅廠之廢氣處理方式與煙道……………………………6 2.3 研究區域環境污染概況………………………………………………………7 2.4 重金屬污染物對地表逕流及承受水體之影響……………………….…….14 2.5 砷…………………………………………………….…….…...………….…16 2.6 砷的序列萃取……………………………………………………….……….18 第三章 研究方法 3.1 研究架構…………………………………………………………….……….22 3.2 煙道碴及受污染土壤採樣分析…………………………………….……….23 3.3 土壤沖蝕量與影響區域範圍評估……………………………………….….27 3.3.1 地理資訊系統軟體分析工具及圖資處理………………………...……27 3.3.2 通用土壤流失公式…………………………………………………...…28 3.3.3 通用土壤流失公式坡度因子(S)之計算……………………….……31 3.3.4 通用土壤流失公式坡長因子(L)之計算……………………….……37 3.3.5 水文模擬分析………………………………………………………...…43 3.4 地表逕流水質採樣分析…………………………………….………….……53 第四章 結果與討論 4.1 煙道碴及受污染土壤特性……………………………………….…….……54 4.2 廢煙道周邊地區污染影響範圍與污染輸出量評估結果……………….….60 4.3 地表逕流水質特性…………………………….………….…………………65 4.4 地表逕流砷污染對當地居民及承受水體之影響評估….………………….73 第五章 結論與建議 5.1 結論…………………………………….…………….………………………74 5.2 建議………………………………………….………………………….……75 參考文獻……….…………….………….…………….………….…………….……...76 附錄……….…………….………….…………….……..…….…………….…….A1- A4 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 原台灣金屬鑛業公司所屬煙道區逕流對承受水體砷污染之影響評估 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The impact of surface runoff near wasted gas tunnels on the arsenic pollution of receiving waters at a contaminated abandoned copper mine and refinery site in Chinkuashih, Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 101-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 闕蓓德(Pei-Te Chiueh),李達源(Dar-Yuan Lee) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 砷,土壤污染,地表逕流,廢煙道,土壤重金屬型態,土壤流失,金瓜石,台灣金屬鑛,業公司, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | arsenic (As),soil pollution,surface runoff,waste gas tunnel,soil heavy metal fractionation,soil errosion,Chinkuashih,Taiwan Metal Mining Corporation (TMMC), | en |
dc.relation.page | 85 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2013-08-16 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-102-1.pdf | 24.03 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。