請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58175
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 鄭守夏 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yin-Ting Pan | en |
dc.contributor.author | 潘尹婷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T08:07:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-10-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-06-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
吳淑瓊、梁浙西、林惠生(民82)。老人長期照護研究.台北: 行政院衛生署委託研究報告。 李世代、范碧玉、黃麗秋(民88)。全民健康保險慢性病ICD-9-CM 分類代碼之研議. 台北: 中央健保局委託研究報告。 許佑任、林恆慶、陳家榆、陳楚杰(民93)。台灣民眾對實施家庭醫師制度之意願及相關因素研究—民眾的認知、態度及參與意願。台灣家庭醫學雜誌,14(4),159-172。 梁煙純(民93)。我國多重慢性病患盛行率及醫療利用分析. 國立陽明大學醫務管理研究所。 許佑任(民94)。參與家庭醫師整合性照護計畫之民眾對醫療服務品質之觀感。台北醫學大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。 陳慶餘、梁繼權、詹其峰(民95)。家庭醫師整合性照護制度試辦計畫之評估研究。行政院衛生署九十四年度委託研究計畫,計畫編號:DOH94-NH-1002。 王美麗(民95)。家庭醫師整合性照護制度健康服務利用與滿意度調查。弘光科技大學護理研究所碩士論文,未出版。 楊耀城(民96)。家庭醫師整合性照護計畫成效探討-以病患滿意度評量-。國立台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。 廖雅惠(民96)。社區醫療群居民醫療需求及醫療利用情形之探討-以大路竹地區為例。行政院衛生署中央健康保險局研究發展結案報告,計畫編號:DOH94-NH-1016。 陳怡蒨(民96)。「全民健保家庭醫師整合性照護試辦計畫」對照護持續性之影響。國立陽明大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。 林宜璇(民98)。評估「全民健康保險家庭醫師整合性照護計畫」的實施對民眾醫療資源利用之影響。國立陽明大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。 英文部分 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2004). AHRQ Quality Indicators-Guide to Prevention Quality Indicators: Hospital Admission for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions (Revision 4). Rockville, MD: AHRQ. Anderson, G. F., & Knickman, J. R. (2001). Changing the chronic care system to meet people's needs. Health Affairs, 20(6), 146-160. Anderson, G. F., & Horvath, J. (2002). Chronic Conditions: Making the Case for Ongoing Care. NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Partnership for Solutions: Princeton. Anderson, G. F.(2003). Physician, public, and policymaker perspectives on chronic conditions. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(4), 437-442. Anderson, G. F., & Horvath, J. (2004). Chronic Conditions: Making the Case for Ongoing Care: 2004 update. NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Partnership for Solutions: Princeton. Anderson, G. F.(2005). Medicare and chronic conditions. New England Journal of Medicine, 353(3), 305-309. Alexander JA, Bae D.(2012) Does the patient-centred medical home work? A critical synthesis of research on patient-centred medical homesand patient-related outcomes. , Health Serv Manage Res. 2012;25(2):51-9. Al-Assaf, A. F. (1998). Managed care quality : a practical guide. Boca Raton. FL: CRC Press. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. J Am Med Assoc.2005;294(6):716–24. Braunstein JB, Anderson GF, Gerstenblith G, et al. Noncardiac comorbidity increases preventable hospitalizations and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(7):1126–33. Balkrishnan, R., Christensen, D. B., & Bowton, D. L. (2002). Self-reported health status, prophylactic medication use, and healthcare costs in older adults with asthma. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50(5), 924-929. Berenson, R. A. (2002). The critical characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries and implications for Medicare reform. Washington DC.: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(5), 373-383. Committee on Quality of HealthCare in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st century. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press; 2001. Carlo ME, Powers JS. Ambulatory care sensitive emergency department use among low-cost medical home patients. Tenn Med 2010;103:31–3. Dunlop DD, Lyons JS, Manheim LM, Song J, Chang RW. Arthritis and heart disease as risk factors for major depression: the role of functional limitation. Med Care. 2004;42(6):502–11. Di Bari, M., Virgillo, A., Matteuzzi, D., Inzitari, M., Mazzaglia, G., Pozzi, C., et al. (2006). Predictive validity of measures of comorbidity in older community dwellers: the Insufficienza Cardiaca negli Anziani Residenti a Dicomano Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54(2), 210-216. Eklund K, Wilhelmson K. Outcomes of coordinated and integrated interventions targeting frail elderly people: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Health Soc Care Community. 2009 Sep;17(5):447-58. Epub 2009 Feb 24. Fried LP, Bandeen-Roche K, Kasper JD, Guralnik JM. Association of comorbidity with disability in older women: The Women’s Health and Aging Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(1):27–37. Ferrante JM, Balasubramanian BA, Hudson SV, Crabtree BF. Principles of the patient-centered medical home and preventive services delivery. Ann Fam Med 2010;8:108–16. Glynn, R. J., Monane, M., Gurwitz, J. H., Choodnovskiy, I., & Avorn, J. (1999). Aging, comorbidity, and reduced rates of drug treatment for diabetes mellitus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52(8), 781-790. Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1556–64. Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Harrold LR, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289(9):1107–16. Grone O. & Garcia-Barbero M. (2001) Integrated care: a position paper of the WHO European Office for Integrated Health Care Services. International Journal of Integrated Care 1, e21. Hoffman, C., Rice, D., & Sung, H. Y. (1996). Persons with chronic conditions: their prevalence and costs. JAMA, 276, 1473-1479. Hwang, W., Weller, W., Ireys, H., & Anderson, G. (2001). Out-of-packet medical spending for care of chronic conditions. Health Aff, 20, 267-278. Hofmarcher M., Oxley H. & Rusticelli E. (2007) Improved health system performance through better care coordination. OECD Health Working Paper no. 30. John R, Kerby DS, Hennessy CH. Patterns and impact of comorbidity and multimorbidity among community-resident American Indian elders.Gerontologist 2003;43(5):649–60. Jemal A, Ward E, Hao Y, Thun M. Trends in the leading causes of death in the United States, 1970-2002. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1255-9. Kodner D. L. All together now: a conceptual exploration of integrated care. Healthc Q. 2009 Oct;13 Spec No:6-15. Kane RL. Meeting the challenge of chronic care. Drugs Today (Barc). 2001 Sep;37(9):581-585. Kane, R. L., Priester, R., & Totten, A. M. (2005). Meeting the Challenge of Chronic Illness. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Kongstvedt, P. R. (1996). The managed health care handbook. Gaithersbur. Md: Aspen Publisher. Kleinsorge CA, Roberts MC, Roy KM, Rapoff MA. The program evaluation of services in a primary care clinic: attaining a medical home. Clin Pediatr 2010;49:548–59. Lee TA, Shields AE, Vogeli C, Gibson TB, Woong-Sohn M, Marder WD, Blumenthal D, Weiss KB. Mortality rate in veterans with multiple chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22 (3):403-7. Le Jemtel TH, Padeletti M, Jelic S. Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in patients with coexistent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(2):171–80. Librero, J., Peiro, S., & Ordinana, R. (1999). Chronic comorbidity and outcomes of hospital care: length of stay, mortality, and readmission at 30 and 365 days. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52(3), 171-179. Landi, F., Onder, G., Cesari, M., Barillaro, C., Lattanzio, F., Carbonin, P. U., et al. (2004). Comorbidity and social factors predicted hospitalization in frail elderly patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57(8), 832-836. Matsui, K., Goldman, L., Johnson, P. A., Kuntz, K. M., Cook, E. F., & Lee, T. H. (1996). Comorbidity as a correlate of length of stay for hospitalized patients with acute chest pain. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 11(5), 262-268. Monane, M., Kanter, D. S., Glynn, R. J., & Avorn, J. (1996). Variability in length of hospitalization for stroke. The role of managed care in an elderly population. Archives of Neurology, 53(9), 875-880. Mollica RL & Gillespie J.(2003). Care coordination for people with chronic conditions. National Academy for State Health Policy Portland , ME: Partnership for Solutions. Johns Hopkins University. (cited March 2010). Mei-ju Chi, Cheng-yi Lee , Shwu-chong Wu. Multiple morbidity combinations impact on medical expenditures among older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 May-Jun;52(3):e210-4. Epub 2010 Dec 4. National Academy of Social Insurance. Medicare in the 21st Century: Building a Better Chronic Care System. Washington, DC: National Academy of Social Insurance; 2003. Partnership for Solutions. Chronic Conditions: Making the Case for Ongoing Care: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2002. Perkins, A. J., Kroenke, K., Unutzer, J., Katon, W., Williams, J. W., Hope, C., et al. (2004). Common comorbidity scales were similar in their ability to predict health care costs and mortality. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57(10),1040-1048. Rosenthal TC.(2008).The medical home: growing evidence to support a new approach to primary care. J Am Board Fam Med.21(5):427-40. Romaire MA, Bell JF. The medical home, preventive care screenings, and counseling for children: evidence from the medical expenditure panel survey. Med Home Prim Care 2010;10:338–45. Schneider KM, O'Donnell BE, Dean D. Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions in the United States' Medicare population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Sep 8;7:82. Schoenberg, N. E., Kim, H., Edwards, W., & Fleming, S. T. (2007). Burden of common multiple-morbidity constellations on out-of-pocket medical expenditures among older adults. Gerontologist, 47(4), 423-437. Stevens GD, Seid M, Pickering TA, Tsai KY. National disparities in the quality of a medical home for children. Matern Child Health J 2010;14:580–9. Struijs, J. N., Baan, C. A., Schellevis, F. G., Westert, G. P., & van den Bos, G. A. M. (2006). Comorbidity in patients with diabetes mellitus: impact on medical health care utilization. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 84. Shelton, P. (2002). Disease Management Programs: The Second Generation. Disease Management & Health Outcomes, 10(8), 461-467. Tinetti ME, Bogardus ST, Agostini JV. Potential pitfalls of diseasespecific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2870–4 Vogeli C, Shields AE, Lee TA, Gibson TB, Marder WD, Weiss KB, Blumenthal D. Multiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22 Suppl 3:391-5. Van den Akker, M., Buntinx, F., & Knottnerus, J. A. (1996). Comorbidity or multimorbidity: What's in a name? A review of literature. European journal of general practice, 2(2), 65-70. Van den Akker, M., Buntinx, F., Roos, S., & Knottnerus, J. A. (2001). Problems in determining occurrence rates of multimorbidity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54(7), 675-679. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Quarterly 1996;74:511–44. Walker, A. E. (2007). A Multiple chronic diseases and quality of life: patterns emerging from a large. . Chronic Illn, 3, 202-218 Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson GF. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:2269–76. Wood DL, McCaskill QE, Winterbauer N, et al. A multi-method assessment of satisfaction with services in the medical home by parents of children and youth with special health care needs. Matern Child Health J 2009;13:5–17. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58175 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目的:
近年來我國多重慢性病問題日益嚴重,但現行醫療照護系統及照護模式仍著重於急性醫療,多重慢性病患容易因缺乏整合性醫療照護而造成片斷式醫療,導致醫療品質下降、醫療費用上升、及惡化醫療結果。我國健保於2009年實施「醫院以病人為中心之門診整合照護計畫」,目的為整合醫院機構內的多重慢性病患醫療照護,本研究考量目前此試辦計畫為我國首個針對多重慢性病試行整合式照護,具有試驗性及先驅性的意義,故希望藉由探討多重慢性病整合照護計畫實施對多重慢性病患之影響,提供我國建構多重慢性病患適當整合照護系統之建議,以期有助於建構多重慢性病患適當之整合照護系統。 研究設計: 本研究資料取自中央健康保險局2008至2011年1月之醫療費用申報檔,屬於次級資料分析,研究設計為自然實驗研究法,以個案收案時間前一年為前測期(T1)、個案收案後第一年為後測期(T2),以差異中差異的方法進行分析。 本研究以「符合研究計畫條件之多重慢性病患」為研究對象,其中多重慢性病患定義為罹患二種以上慢性病之病患(慢性病範圍為高血壓、糖尿病、心臟病、中風及慢性阻塞性肺炎等5項慢性病)。 樣本篩選方式是透過傾向分數配對,選取介入組10,000人、試辦院所對照組10,000人及非試辦院所對照組10,000人,比較這三組在試辦計畫實施前後對多重慢性病患的初步影響及分析相關因素。 結果: 1.門診利用: 在門診次數方面,以差異中差異分析法發現,介入組之門診次數在試辦計畫介入後,相對於試辦院所對照組低了3% (e^β=0.97),且達統計上顯著差異(P<.0001);相對於非試辦院所對照組低了17% (e^β=0.83),且達統計上顯著差異(P<.0001)。 在照護連續性方面,以差異中差異分析法發現,介入組之照護連續性UPC分數在試辦計畫介入後,相對於試辦院所對照組高0.03且達統計上顯著差異(P<0.0001);介入組之照護連續性在試辦計畫介入後,相對於非試辦院所對照組高0.07且達統計上顯著差異(P<0.0001)。 2.照護結果:本研究以每百人平均每年ACSC住院住診次數作探討,以差異中差異分析法發現,介入組、試辦院所對照組及非試辦院所對照組無顯著差異。 3.醫療費用:本研究以健保申報的總醫療費用作探討,差異中差異分析發現,介入組與試辦院所對照組無顯著差異;但介入組之總醫療費用在試辦計畫介入後,相對於非試辦院所對照組低且達統計上顯著差異(β=-0.1878,P<0.0001)。 結論: 研究成果顯示,整合式照護計畫實施後對多重慢性病患整體照護情形有顯著的正面影響,包括門診次數減少、照護連續性增加及醫療費用減少等,但因本研究期間僅為試辦計畫介入前後一年,未來需更長期及更進一步地完整評估方得以反映出計畫對多重慢性病患的影響。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Objective:
In recent years, patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) have increasingly become a problem with high prevalence and high cost. Patients with MCC face fragmented care and lack of coordination among various health care providers because the medical system is mainly focus on acute care. In 2009, The National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA) in Taiwan implemented “The Coordinated Program for Multiple Chronic Conditions” in order to intergrate the medical services to patients with MCCs. The purpose of this study is to analyse the preliminary effect of this program on healthcare utilization, outcome and expenses. Results of this study may be of value to the NHIA. Design: A before-after control group natural experimental design was used to assess the impact of the program. Patients with MCCs who joined the program were identified by the NHIA participant list as the intervention group. Patients with MCCs and who had never participated in this program were identified as the control group. According to their most frequently visiting hospitals, we selected two control groups by propensity score matching approach, one is the participating hospital control group and the other is the non-participating hospital control group. The three study groups consisted of 10,000 subjects respectively. Data for the analysis were obtained from the NHIA from 2008-2011. Difference in difference analysis was conucted to assess the program impact. Results: 1.Healthcare Utilization: (1)Using difference in difference analysis, we found that patients with MCC in the intervention group have fewer out-patient visits than subjects in the 2 control groups which reached a statistically significant level (P<.0001). (2)Results from the difference in difference analysis showed that patients in the intervention group has higher continuity of care (UPCs) than patients in the 2 control groups with P<.0001. 2.Outcome of care: Using difference in difference analysis we found no significant differences in hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions among the patients in the intervention group and the two control groups. 3.Medical expenditure: Results from the difference in difference analysis indicated that there was no difference in healthcare expenses between patients in the intervention group and participating hospital control group; but patients in the intervention group consumed lower expenses than those in the non-participating hospital control groups with β=-0.1878,P<0.0001. Conclusion: Our preliminary results indicated that the Integrated Care Program reduced the numver of physician visits, increased the continuity of care and lowered the medical expenditure for participating patients. However, more comprehensive evaluation is needed to detect the long-term impact of the the integrated care program in the future. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T08:07:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R00848026-1.pdf: 946698 bytes, checksum: 211485f72128e4a4f5a66b1e797d367a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要.......................................................i
Abstract.................................................iii 第一章 緒論................................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機..................................1 第二節 研究目的與重要性................................2 第二章 文獻探討............................................3 第一節 多重慢性病簡介..................................3 第二節 整合式照護簡介..................................9 第三節 文獻探討小節...................................12 第四節 「醫院以病人為中心門診整合照護試辦計畫」簡介...13 第三章 材料與方法........................................16 第一節 研究材料與對象.................................16 第二節 研究設計與假說.................................19 第三節 資料處理.......................................21 第四節 研究變項與操作型定義...........................27 第五節 統計方法.......................................32 第四章 研究結果..........................................34 第一節 研究樣本描述性統計.............................34 第二節 介入組介入前後之醫療利用及費用改變情形.........41 第三節 分析樣本門診利用、照護結果及醫療費用之分析.....43 第五章 討論與建議........................................61 第一節 討論...........................................61 第二節 研究限制.......................................65 第三節 未來建議.......................................66 參考文獻..................................................68 附錄一 試辦計畫簡介......................................73 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 全民健康保險多重慢性病整合式照護試辦計畫之初步影響評估 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The preliminary evaluation of the Integrated Care Program for Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions under National Health Insurance in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳肖琪,楊銘欽 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 多重慢性病,整合式照護,以病人為中心,計畫評估,全民健康保險, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | multiple chronic conditions,integrated care program,coordinated care,program evaluation,national health insurance in Taiwan, | en |
dc.relation.page | 84 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-06-10 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 924.51 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。