Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 臺大-復旦EMBA境外專班
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58138
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor黃崇興,錢世政
dc.contributor.authorShu-Hung Linen
dc.contributor.author林書弘zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T08:06:42Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-09
dc.date.copyright2014-07-09
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2014-06-18
dc.identifier.citation1. Cooper, D. R and C. W. Emory著,古永嘉譯,企業研究方法,台北:華泰,民國85年。
2. Drucker, Peter F.著,蕭富蜂、李田樹譯,創新與創業精神,台北:城邦出版,民國91年。
3. Porter, Michael E.著,李明宣、邱如美譯,競爭優勢,台北:天下遠見出版,民國88年。
4. Wimmer, R and Dominick, J.著,李天任、藍莘譯,大眾媒體研究,台北:亞太出版,民國84年。
5. 大前研一著,黃宏義譯,策略家的智慧,台北:長河出版,民國73年。
6. 王平台,談傳統製造業轉型之看法,電腦繪圖與設計雜誌,民國89年,144,105-107。
7. 王志毅,動力鋰電池成本趨勢分析,TRI,民國99年。
8. 王志毅,動力鋰電池重點廠商布局規劃分析,TRI,民國100年。
9. 古永嘉,企業研究方法,台北:華泰出版,民國85年。
10. 司徒達賢,策略管理,台北:遠流出版,民國84年。
11. 竹本次郎,從勞動密集到技術密集的轉型,日本:文摘出版,民國78年。
12. 吳思華,策略九說,台北:臉譜出版,民國87年。
13. 吳凱琳,創新的兩難,台北:商周出版,民國91年。
14. 日本中小企業事業團,林寄雯譯,中小企業轉型策略(上),台北:經濟部國貿局出版,民國81年。
15. 袁素萍,企業轉型成功關鍵因素之研究,國立成功大學館理學院高階管理碩士在職專班未出版碩士論文,民國92年。
16. 張正錩,我國傳統製造業轉型觀光工廠之經營策略探索性研究,中原大學企管管理學系研究所未出版碩士論文,民國94年。
17. 陳明璋,企業轉型經營策略文獻與實證探討,台北:華泰出版,民國89年。
18. 曾麗玉,智慧資本與創新策略對跨國企業經營績效影響之研究—以台灣地區電子資訊業為例,中國文化大學國際企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國94年。
19. 黃俊英,行銷研究,管理與技術,台北:華泰出版,民國85年。
20. 黃維賓,知識管理、創新策略與組織績效之關係研究—以台灣積體電路製造業為例,大葉大學事業經營研究所未出版碩士論文,民國91年。
21. 歐智生,動態能力的前因及其對企業經營型態影響之研究-以台灣流行服飾產業為例,國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理所未出版碩士論文,民國94年。
22. 賴忠孝,科技產業的創新策略管理之研究-以台灣華通電腦公司為例,國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班未出版碩士論文,民國94年。
23. 顏如妙,企業創新力指標建構之研究,國立政治大學創新與創造力研究中心未出版碩士論文,民國93年。
24. Aaker, David A. Strategic Market Management. New York: John Wiley and Sons Co., 1984.
25. Abell, Derek F. Defining the Business: the Starting Point of Strategic Planning Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall., 1980.
26. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. E. Review: Knowledge Management & Knowledge Management Systems:Conceptual Foundations & Research Issue. MIS Quarterly, 2001, 25(1), p107-136.
27. Argote, L. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, & Transferring Knowledge. Kluwer Academic: Boston, MA, 1999.
28. Banker, R. D., Bardhan, I. R., Chang, H. and Lin, S. Plant Information Systems, Manufacturing Capabilities, & Plant Performance. MIS Quarterly, 2006, 30(3), p315-337.
29. Barney, J. Firm Resources and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 1991, 17, p99-120.
30. Bharadwaj, A. S. A Resource-based Perspective on Information technology capability & firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 2000, 24(2), p169-196.
31. Bogner, W. C. and Barr, P. S. Making Sense in Hypercompetitive Environments: A Cognitive Explanation for the Persistence of High Velocity competition. Organization Science, 2000, 11(2), p212-226.
32. Bordogna, Joseph. Innovation & Creative Transformation in the Knowledge Age: Critical Trajectories. Plenary Session presentation, 1997.
33. Bowman, C. and Ambrosini, V. How the Resource-based & the Dynamic Capability Views of the Firm Inform Corporate-level Strategy. British Journal of Management, 2003, 14(1), p289-303.
34. Branscomb, L. M. and Kodama, F. Japanese Innovation Strategy-Technical Support for Business Visions. M.A: University Press of America, Inc, 1993.
35. Brown, J. S., and Duguid, P. Organizational Learning & Communities of Practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning & innovation. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1), p40-57.
36. Burgelman, Robert A., Christensen Clayton M., Wheelwright Steven C. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation, United Kingdom, WY Leeds, 2004.
37. Chandler, A.D. Strategy and Structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962.
38. Christensen M. C. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
39. Collis, D. J. Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue, 1994, 15(1), p143-152.
40. Cooper, R., and Kaplan, R.S. The Design of Cost Management Systems: Text, Cases and Reading. N.J.: Prentice Hall., Englewood Cliffs, 1991.
41. Curry, S. J. and Clayton, R. H. Business Innovation Strategies. Business Quarterly, Winter, 1992, p121-126.
42. Danneels, E. The Dynamics of Product Innovation & Firm Competences. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(9), p1095-1121.
43. Eccles, R.G., and Nohria, N. Networks and Organizations. Cambridge. MA: Harvard Business Press, 1992.
44. Eisenhardt, K. M., and Martin, J. A. Dynamic Capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal., 2000 , 21(2), p1105-1121.
45. Feeny, D. F., and Willcocks, L. P. Core IS Capabilities for Exploiting Information Technology. Sloan Management Review, 1998, 39(3), p9-21.
46. Fowler, S., King, A., Marsh, S. J. and Victor, B. Beyond products: New Strategic Imperatives for Developing Competencies in Dynamic Environments. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2000, 17(1), p357-377.
47. Galunic, D. C., and Rodan, S. Resource Recombinations in the Firm: Knowledge Structures & the Potential for Schumpeterian Innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19(1), p1193-1201.
48. Garud, R., and Nayyar, P. R. Transformative Capacity: Continual Structuring by Inter-Temporal Technology Transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(1), p365-386.
49. Gilbert, J. Choosing an Innovation Strategy: Theory & Practice. Business Horizons, 1994, 37(6), p16-22.
50. Ginter, P.M., and Duncan, W.J. Macro Environmental Analysis for Strategic Management. Long Range Planning, 1990, 23(6), p91-100.
51. Grant, R.M. The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 1991, p114-135.
52. Helfat, C. E. and Peteraf, M. A. The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability Lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal., 2003, 24(2), p997-1010.
53. Henderson, J. C. and Clark, H. Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies & the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990.
54. Henderson, R. and Cockburn, I. Measuring Competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal., 1994, 15(1), p63-48.
55. Hofer, C. W.and Schendel, D. Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. St. Paul. MN: West Publishing Company, 1978.
56. Jauch, L. R. and Glueck W. F. Strategic Management and Business Policy. New York, Mc Graw-Hill, 1988.
57. Jauch, L. R., and Glueck, W. F. Strategy management and business policy, 3rd ed. New York; McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1989.
58. Kalakota, R., and Robinson, M. e-Business Roadmap for Success, Addison-Wesley. New York, 1999.
59. Kaplan R. S. Managing Innovation, Harvard Business Management Practice Chinese Edition, 2004, p36-48.
60. Lee, Jungwon and Lee, J. Competitive Structure and Strategic Types in the Korean Software Industry. Technovation, 1994, 14, p295-309.
61. Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L. and Barney, J. B. Information Technology & Sustained Competitive Advantage: A resource-Based Analysis. MIS Quarterly, 1995, 19(1), p487-505.
62. Miller, A. and Dess, Gregory G. Strategic Management. New York: McGraw-Hill/ Irwin, 1996.
63. Morton, T. Innovation: People & Implementation. Management Decision, 1989, 27(3), p5-14.
64. Parsons, A. J. Building Innovativeness in Large U.S. Corporations. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1992, 9(2), p35-50.
65. Pavlou, P. A., and El Sawy, O. A. Understanding the 'Black Box' of Dynamic Capabilities. Under a 3rd round of review in Management Science, 2005.
66. Pavlou, P. A., and El Sawy, O. A. From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development. Information Systems Research, 2006, 17(1), p198-227.
67. Peteraf, Margaret A. The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resources-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14, p179-91.
68. Porter, M.E. Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press, 1980.
69. Porter, M.E. Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press, 1985.
70. Porter, Michael E. Competitive Advantage. New York, NY The Free Press, 1985
71. Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 1990, 68(3), p79-91.
72. Priem, R. L. and Butler, J. E. Is the Resource-Based View a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Academy of Management Review, 2001, 26(1), p22-40.
73. Quinn, R. W., and Dutton, J. E. Coordination as Energy-In Conversation. Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30(1), p36-57.
74. Ray, G., W. A. Muhanna, and Barney, J. B. Information Technology & the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 2005, 29(2), p625-642.
75. Rindova, V. P., and Kotha, S. Continuous Morphing: Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form & Function. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(6), p1263-1280.
76. Robert, M. Product Innovation Strategy Pure & Simple. NY: Mc Graw-Hill Inc, 1995.
77. Ross, J., Beath, C. and Vitale, M. Develop Long-Term Competitiveness Through IT Assets. Sloan Management Review, 1996, 38(1), p31-45.
78. Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. Industrial Innovation & Public Policy-Preparing for the 1980s & the 1990s. London: Fances Printer, 1985.
79. Sanchez, A., Heene and Thomas, H. Dynamics of Competence-Based Competition: Theory & Practice in The New Strategic Management. Oxford: Pergamon, Elservier Science Ltd, 1996.
80. Shaheen, G. T. Approach to Transformation. Chief Executive, 1994, 3(1), p2-5.
81. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. Dynamic Capabilities & Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7), p509-533.
82. Tippins, M. J., and Sohi, R. S. IT Competency & Firm Performance: Is Organizational Learning a Missing Link? Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(1), p745-761.
83. Weick, K. E., and Quinn, R.E. Organizational Change & Development. Annual Review of Psychology, 1999, 50(1), p361-386.
84. Wheeler, B. C. NEBIC: a Dynamic Capabilities Theory for Assessing Net-Enablement. Informations Systems Research, 2002, 13(2), p125-146.
85. Wimmer, R.D. and Dominick, J.R. Mass media research: An introduction, 5th ed. Belmont. CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1997).
86. Winter, S. G. Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(1), p991-995.
87. Yin, R. K. Case Study research-design and methods. London: Sage Publications., 1989
88. Zahra, S. A., and George, G. Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, & Extension. Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27(1), p185-203.
89. Zander, U., and Kogut, B. Knowledge & the Speed of the Transfer & Imitation of Organizational Capabilities. Organization Science, 1995, 6(1), p76-92.
90. Zollo, M., and Winter, S. G. Deliberate Learning & the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science, 2002, 13(1), p339-351.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58138-
dc.description.abstract本研究探討我國季節性裝飾燈產業之發展現況、特質及競爭要素,進而從產業競爭的角度檢視國內業者所面臨機會、威脅與競爭之優、劣勢並整合相關之策略管理理論進行系統化分析,以期提出產業競爭要素及其致勝之道。本研究以特定個案公司為研究標的,研究主要結果摘錄如下:
一、季節性裝飾燈產業的五力分析
在同業競爭程度部份,因與競爭對手彼此間的差異仍有縮小的空間,且本產業部份產品屬成熟性產品,技術層次較低,故來自國內外的競爭者使得同業競爭程度變得很高。在潛在進入者的威脅部份,因國內大部份廠商多採分工合作完成,但在控制運用方面需要相當的技術層面,反觀目前能夠採一條龍廠商尚不多,故潛在進入者的威脅是高的。在替代品的威脅部份,因傳統的燈具如CFL節能燈具、高壓鈉燈等,都是LED照明技術的替代品,但對於季節燈飾產品市場而言,LED產品已是市場主流,非LED光源產品取代性較低,故替代品的威脅是低的。在客戶議價能力部份,LED燈飾產品已標準化,對購買者轉換成本低,而各廠家的成本差異不大,所以客戶議價能力是偏低的。在供應者的議價能力部份,公司本身擁有研發及製造能力,供應者相較是比較弱勢的,供應者的議價能力是偏低的。
二、個案公司的優劣勢與機會威脅
在優勢部份,包括:燈飾產品具有自身優勢、產品出口銷售相當具有價格優勢、具有良好的生產設施,生產能力強、具有高價值的研發基礎,且新產品接受獨特設計或 Logo、通過各種認證,產品品質優良、地理優勢,交貨迅速。在劣勢部份,包括:缺乏技術開發策略聯盟與產學研的緊密合作、銷售管道比較單一、直接生產成本增加、大陸當地企業和外資的突起,產生了較大的威脅。在機會部份,包括:消費者個性化需求不斷增加,市場持續成長、中國經濟環境良好,刺激燈飾需求、各種新領域高附加價值的產品不斷推出。在威脅分析部份,包括:其他光源產品的發展、大陸低價競爭。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the development of the current situation and the competitive elements of the seasonal nature of decorative lights industry, and thus view the domestic industry faces competition from the industrial point of view the opportunity, threat and competition advantages, disadvantages and integrated strategic management theories related to the systematic analysis, to making the industry competitive factors and keys to success. In this study, the specific subject of the case study company, main results are summarized as follows:
1.Seasonal decorative lights Industry Five Forces Analysis
The degree of competition in the industry part , due to the differences between them and the competitors are still narrow space , and the industrial part of the product is a mature product , lower level of skill , so competitors from home and abroad so that the degree of competition in the industry becomes high. The threat of potential entrants in part , because the majority of domestic manufacturers more mining division of labor to complete , but requires considerable use in controlling the technical aspects , the contrast is not currently able to adopt one-stop multi- vendor , so the threat of potential entrants is high . The threat of substitutes in part , because the traditional lighting such as CFL energy saving lamps , high pressure sodium , are alternatives to LED lighting technology , but for seasonal markets lighting products , LED products have a mainstream, non- LED light products less substituted , the threat of substitutes is low. In most of the bargaining power of customers , LED lighting products have been standardized , low switching costs for buyers , the manufacturers and the cost difference is not big, so the bargaining power of customers is low . In most of the bargaining power of suppliers , the company itself has R & D and manufacturing capabilities, is relatively weak compared to the supplier , the supplier's bargaining power is low .
2.The case company's strengths and weaknesses and the opportunities to threats
In the advantages, including: lighting products have their own advantages, export sales quite a price advantage, with good production facilities, strong production capacity, with high-value R & D infrastructure, and the unique design of new product acceptance or Logo, through a variety of certification , product quality, geographical advantages, fast delivery. In the inferior part, including: the lack of a strategic alliance with technology development and research in close collaboration, sales pipeline is relatively simple, direct production cost increases, local businesses and foreign continent projections, creating a greater threat. In most of the opportunity, including: increasing demand of individual consumers, the market continues to grow, a good Chinese economic environment, stimulating demand for lighting, all kinds of new areas of high value-added products has introduced. In the majority of threat analysis, including: the development of other light products, competition from cheap mainland.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T08:06:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-103-P00750016-1.pdf: 5905043 bytes, checksum: 87da9188f81e739662dab29fe5873262 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目 錄
口試委員會審定書 i
中文摘要 ii
英文摘要 iii
目 錄 v
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒 論 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究目的 3
第三節、研究範圍 3
第四節、研究限制 3
第五節、研究方法與步驟 4
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節、策略定義與類型 8
第二節、轉型定義與類型 13
第三節、五力分析 17
第四節、SWOT分析 21
第三章 裝飾燈產業背景 24
第一節、產業面概況 24
第二節、市場趨勢剖析 26
第三節、近年季節性裝飾燈市場需求變化 27
第四章 個案分析 46
第一節、營運現況分析 46
第二節、五力分析 51
第三節、價值鏈分析 53
第四節、SWOT及策略矩陣分析 55
第五章 結論與建議 60
第一節、研究結論 60
第二節 後續研究建議 63
參考文獻 64

圖目錄
圖1-1 研究架構圖 6
圖1-2 研究流程圖 7
圖2-1 Porter五力分析的架構 20
圖3-1 2010-2012中國聖誕樹燈組(940530)出口數量趨勢 28
圖3-2 2010-2012中國聖誕樹燈組(940530)出口總值趨勢 29
圖3-3 2010-2012中國聖誕樹燈組(940530)出口量月份走勢,單位(10000套) 29
圖3-4 2010-2012中國聖誕樹燈組(940530)出口量月份走勢,單位(美元) 30
圖3-5 2010-2012中國聖誕樹燈組(940530)每月平均出口單價(美元/套) 30
圖3-6 2012年1月至12月中國聖誕樹燈組(940530)主要出口國家/地區(出口值) 34
圖3-7 2009-2011年全年度全球聖誕樹燈組總進口趨勢(940530)(100萬美元) 35
圖3-8 2009-2011年全球聖誕樹燈組(940530)的年度總出口趨勢(100萬美元) 37
圖3-9 美國聖誕樹燈組2010-2012年進口總值趨勢 39
圖3-10 英國聖誕樹燈組2010-2012年進口總值趨勢 40
圖3-11 澳洲聖誕樹燈組2010-2012年進口總值趨勢 41
圖3-12 聖誕燈飾裝飾造形-雪人 42
圖3-13 聖誕燈飾裝飾造形-鈴鐺及棍棒 43
圖3-14 聖誕燈飾裝飾造形-水晶立形燈 43
圖3-15 聖誕燈飾裝飾造形-廣場擺設 43
圖3-16 聖誕燈飾裝飾造形-廣場花園擺設(一) 44
圖3-17 聖誕燈飾裝飾造形-廣場花園擺設(二) 44
圖3-18 聖誕燈飾裝飾造形-廣場花園擺設(三) 44
圖3-19 聖誕燈飾裝飾造形-廣場花園擺設(四) 45
圖3-20 聖誕燈飾裝飾造形-內部陳列室擺設 45
圖4-1 Y公司主力產品圖 48
圖4-2 Y公司組織架構圖 49
圖4-3 季節燈飾產業五力分析圖 53


表目錄
表2-1 策略定義整理表 9
表2-2 各種策略層級定義 11
表2-3 各種經營策略分類 12
表2-4 企業轉型之定義 14
表2-5 Bibeault之企業轉型五種類 15
表2-6 森口八郎提出企業轉型之種類 16
表2-7 森口八郎提出企業轉型之方法 16
表3-1 2010-2012年中國聖誕樹燈組(940530)出口市場分析 31
表3-2 2010-2012年中國聖誕樹燈套裝(940530)出口市場比例分析 32
表3-3 2012年1月至12月中國聖誕樹燈組(940530)出口數量和金額 32
表3-4 2012年1月至12月中國聖誕樹燈組(940530)主要出口國家/地區 33
表3-5 2012年1月至12月中國聖誕樹燈組(940530)出口來源地 34
表3-6 2009-2011年全球聖誕樹燈組(940530)主要進口國/地區之進口總值 35
表3-7 2009-2011年全球聖誕樹燈組(940530)主要進口國/地區的市場比例 36
表3-8 2009-2011年全球聖誕樹燈組(940530)的主要出口國家/地區的出口價值 38
表3-9 2009-2011年全球聖誕樹燈組(940530)的主要出口國家/地區的市場比例 38
表3-10 2012年1-12月聖誕樹燈組主要進口國家/地區-美國的分佈 40
表3-11 2012年1-12月聖誕樹燈組主要進口國家/地區-英國的分佈 41
表3-12 2012年1-12月聖誕樹燈組主要進口國家/地區-澳洲的分佈 42
表4-1 Y公司簡介 46
表4-2 Y公司2012年營運概況 47
表4-3 Y公司2012至2013年營運變化 59
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title從國際消費市場趨勢探討季節性裝飾燈產業轉型
升級之策略
zh_TW
dc.titleExplore the Transformation and Upgrading Strategies in Seasonal Decorative Lighting Industry from the International Consumer Market Trendsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear102-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳鴻基,薛求知,蘇勇
dc.subject.keyword轉型,創新,產業分析,五力分析,SWOT分析,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordcorporate transformation,innovation,industry analysis,five forces analysis,SWOT analysis,en
dc.relation.page69
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2014-06-18
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept臺大-復旦EMBA境外專班zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:臺大-復旦EMBA境外專班

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-103-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
5.77 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved