請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58123完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳玲玲(Ling-Ling Wu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Yu Pai | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 白姿俞 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T08:06:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-07-16 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-07-16 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-06-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Amaldoss, W., & Jain, S. (2010). Reference groups and product line decisions: An experimental investigation of limited editions and product proliferation. Management Science, 56(4), 621-644.
Anderson, L. R., & Holt, C. A. (1997). Information Cascades in the Laboratory. American Economic Review, 87(5), 847-862. Baker, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Majority and Minority Influence: Source-Position Imbalance as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(1), 5-19. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press. Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A Simple Model of Herd Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797-817. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992-1026. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1998). Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151-170. Bonabeau, E. (2004). The perils of the imitation age. Harvard business review, 82(6), 45-54. Boulding, W., & Kirmani, A. (1993). A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality? Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 111-123. Brynjolfsson, E., & Smith, M. D. (2000). Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Science, 46(4), 563-585. Buunk, B. P., Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., VanYperen, N. W., & Dakof, G. A. (1990). The Affective Consequences of Social Comparison: Either Direction Has Its Ups and Downs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1238-1249. Buunk, A. P., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(1), 3-21. Buunk, B. P., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). New directions in social comparison research. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(5), 467-475. Cai, H., Chen, Y., & Fang, H. (2009). Observational learning: Evidence from a randomized natural field experiment. American Economic Review, 99(3), 864-882. Celen, B., & Kariv, S. (2004). Observational learning under imperfect information. Games and Economic Behavior, 47(1), 72-86. Chen, S., Shechter, D., & Chaiken, S. (1996). Getting at the Truth or Getting Along: Accuracy- Versus Impression-Motivated Heuristic and Systematic Processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 262-275. Chen, Y., Wang, Q., & Xie, J. (2011). Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth versus observational learning. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(2), 238-254. Chen, Y. F. (2008). Herd behavior in purchasing books online. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 1977-1992. Choudhury, V., & Karahanna, E. (2008). The relative advantage of electronic channels: A multidimensional view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 32(1), 179-200. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307-319. Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2005). An empirical investigation of herding on the internet: The case of software downloading, Las Vegas, NV. Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2009). Informational cascades and software adoption on the Internet: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 33(1), 23-48. Duflo, E., & Saez, E. (2003). The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 815-842. Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (1998). Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 131-157. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7(2), 117-140. French, D. P., Hevey, D., Sutton, S., Kinmonth, A. L., & Marteau, T. M. (2006). Personal and social comparison information about health risk: Reaction to information and information search. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(3), 497-510. Goethals, G. R., & Darley, J. M. (1977). Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 259-278). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing. Hanson, W. A., & Putler, D. S. (1996). Hits and misses: Herd behavior and online product popularity. Marketing letters, 7(4), 297-305. Hyman, H. H. (1960). Reflections on reference groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(3), 383-396. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Toad, P. A. (1996). Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1(2), 59-88. Jones, E. E., & Gerard, H. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. Oxford, England: Wiley. Karlsson, N., Garling, T., Dellgran, P., & Klingander, B. (2005). Social comparison and consumer behavior: When feeling richer or poorer than others is more important than being so. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(6), 1206-1222. Kauffman, R. J., Lai, H., & Ho, C. T. (2010). Incentive mechanisms, fairness and participation in online group-buying auctions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(3), 249-262. Kim, H. W., Xu, Y., & Gupta, S. (2012). Which is more important in Internet shopping, perceived price or trust? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(3), 241-252. Kirmani, A. (1990). The effect of perceived advertising costs on brand perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 160-171. Kirmani, A., & Rao, A. R. (2000). No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of marketing, 64(2), 66-79. Lascu, D. N., & Zinkhan, G. (1999). Consumer conformity: review and applications for marketing theory and practice. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 1-12. Lee, B. K., & Lee, W. N. (2004). The effect of information overload on consumer choice quality in an on-line environment. Psychology and Marketing, 21(3), 159-183. Liang, T. P., & Huang, J. S. (1998). An empirical study on consumer acceptance of products in electronic markets: A transaction cost model. Decision Support Systems, 24(1), 29-43. Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and Me: Predicting the Impact of Role Models on the Self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 91-103. Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1999). Increasing the salience of one's best selves can undermine inspiration by outstanding role models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 214-228. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2004). E-Business strategies and internet business models: How the internet adds value. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 161-173. Major, B., Testa, M., & Blysma, W. H. (1991). Responses to upward and downward social comparisons: The impact of esteem-relevance and perceived control. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 237-260). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Moreau, C. P., & Herd, K. B. (2010). To each his own? how comparisons with others influence consumers' evaluations of their self-designed products. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 806-819. Mussweiler, T. (2001). Focus of comparison as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast in social comparison. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(1), 38-47. Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (2000). Consequences of Social Comparison. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of Social Comparison (pp. 253-270): Springer US. Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. The Journal of Political Economy, 82(4), 729. Ogden, H. J., & Venkat, R. (2001). Social comparison and possessions: Japan vs Canada. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 13(2), 72-84. Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1977). Students and Housewives: Differences in Susceptibility to Reference Group Influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(2), 102-110. Peterson, R. S., & Nemeth, C. J. (1996). Focus versus flexibility: Majority and minority influence can both improve performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(1), 14-23. Rao, A. R., Qu, L., & Ruekert, R. W. (1999). Signaling Unobservable Product Quality Through a Brand Ally. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 258-268. Richins, M. L. (1995). Social comparison, advertising, and consumer discontent. American Behavioral Scientist, 38(4), 593-607. Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311(5762), 854-856. Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2000). Consumer behavior, 7th ed. USA: Prentice-Hall. Singer, E. (1981). Reference groups and social evaluations. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social psychology: Sociological perspectives (pp. 66-93). New York: Transaction Publishers. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. Spence, M. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92(3), 434-459. Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 159-163. Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (2000). Handbook of social comparison: theory and research. New York: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers. Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social Comparison Activity Under Threat: Downward Evaluation and Upward Contacts. Psychological Review, 96(4), 569-575. Tucker, C., & Zhang, J. (2007). Long tail or steep tail? A field investigation into how online popularity information affects the distribution of customer choices. Sloan working papers. MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge. Tucker, C., & Zhang, J. (2011). How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Science, 57(5), 828-842. Van De Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2011). The envy premium in product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 984-998. Van Der Zee, K., Buunk, B., & Sanderman, R. (1998). Neuroticism and Reactions to Social Comparison Information among Cancer Patients. Journal of personality, 66(2), 174-194. Wayment, H. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1995). Self-evaluation processes: motives, information use, and self-esteem. Journal of personality, 63(4), 729-757. Wei, P. S., & Lu, H. P. (2013). An examination of the celebrity endorsements and online customer reviews influence female consumers’ shopping behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 193-201. Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90(2), 245-271. Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 231-248. Wood, W., Pool, G. J., Leck, K., & Purvis, D. (1996). Self-Definition, Defensive Processing, and Influence: The Normative Impact of Majority and Minority Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1181-1193. Wu, C. S., & Cheng, F. F. (2011). The joint effect of framing and anchoring on internet buyers' decision-making. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(3), 358-368. Ye, Q., Cheng, Z., & Fang, B. (2013). Learning from other buyers: The effect of purchase history records in online marketplaces. Decision Support Systems, 56(1), 502-512. Zhang, J. (2010). The sound of silence: Observational learning in the U.S. kidney market. Marketing Science, 29(2), 315-335. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/58123 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 產品的熱門訊息(如銷售量等)是一個在網路上唾手可得的重要資訊，可作為消費者降低購買決策不確定性的參考依據。過去研究假設熱門訊息被消費者解讀成是一個產品品質的指標，使得已經熱賣的產品可以進一步刺激其銷售量。除了品質評估的機制外，消費者也可以透過社會比較(Social Comparison)的機制來解讀熱門訊息。在社會比較的機制中，消費者可以和其他人做比較，藉此評估他們的決策。消費者可以和自己相似的人做比較，即平行比較(Lateral Comparison)，或是和比自己好的人做比較，即向上比較(Upward Comparison)。本研究檢驗兩種可能解讀熱門訊息的機制(產品的品質評估和社會比較)對消費者購買意圖的影響，而研究採取2 (熱門訊息：高與低) x 3 (解讀機制：品質評估、向上比較和平行比較)受測者間因子實驗設計。實證結果顯示，使用品質評估或平行比較機制的消費者對於熱門產品的購買意圖比較高。相反地，採用向上比較機制的消費者對於不熱門的產品比較有購買意圖。最後，我們會進一步討論本研究結果在網路行銷市場上的管理意涵。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Popularity information of products (e.g., sales volume), now readily available online, can be an important information consulted by consumers to decrease uncertainty of purchase decisions. Past research has assumed that popularity information is interpreted as an indicator of product quality such that an already high level of popularity can further boost sales volume. Besides the mechanism of quality evaluation, the information of popularity can also be processed with the mechanism of social comparison, where consumers compare themselves with other people to evaluate their decisions. Consumers might compare with similar others, i.e., lateral comparison, or with better-off others, i.e., upward comparison. This study examines the effects of these two possible information processing mechanisms of popularity information on consumers’ purchase intention: product quality evaluation and social comparison. The experiment was conducted with a 2 (popularity information: high vs. low) x 3 (processing mechanism: quality evaluation, upward comparison and lateral comparison) between-subjects factorial design. The empirical results show that consumers who used the mechanisms of quality evaluation or lateral comparison reported a greater purchase intention for popular products. In contrast, those employed the upward comparison mechanism reported a favorable purchase intention towards less popular products. The managerial implications of our study results on Internet market are further discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T08:06:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R00725033-1.pdf: 568762 bytes, checksum: 6f6aa3404611876893c0f2cd745aac34 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii Table of Contents iii Table Index iv Figure Index iv 1. Introduction 1 2. Literature Review 5 2.1 Observational Learning and Popularity Information 5 2.2 Popularity Information as a Cue for Product Quality Evaluation 6 2.3 Popularity Information as a Cue for Social Comparison 10 3. Research Methodology 16 3.1 Experimental Design 16 3.2 Stimulus Materials 17 3.3 Measurements 18 3.4 Experimental Procedure 18 3.5 Participants 19 4. Empirical Results 20 5. Conclusions 22 5.1 Conclusions and Discussion 22 5.2 Managerial Implications 25 5.3 Limitations and Future Research 26 6. Reference 28 7. Appendix 38 7.1 Appendix A: Measurements 38 7.2 Appendix B: Results of ANOVA on Purchase Intention 38 7.3 Appendix C: Demographic Information 40 7.4 Appendix D: Examples of the Online Shopping Scenarios 41 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 觀察學習 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 熱門訊息 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會比較 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 購買意圖 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 網路行銷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | popularity information | en |
| dc.subject | social comparison | en |
| dc.subject | observational learning | en |
| dc.subject | purchase intention | en |
| dc.subject | Internet marketing | en |
| dc.title | 消費者如何解讀線上熱門訊息 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | How Consumers Interpret the Meaning of Popularity Information Online | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 翁崇雄(Chorng-Shyong Ong),盧希鵬(Hsi-Peng Lu) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 熱門訊息,社會比較,觀察學習,購買意圖,網路行銷, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | popularity information,social comparison,observational learning,purchase intention,Internet marketing, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 43 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-06-20 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 555.43 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。