Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 理學院
  3. 海洋研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57923
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor蕭仁傑(Jen-Chieh Shiao)
dc.contributor.authorChien-Kang Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃建綱zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T07:11:56Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-16
dc.date.copyright2014-07-16
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2014-07-04
dc.identifier.citation陳勝軍、李來好、楊賢慶、吳燕燕、刁石強、馬海霞、石紅 (2008) 魚翅加工工藝與品質鑑定。中國水產 10:72-74。
李弘善 (2008) 鯊魚劍的故事 [線上資源]。中華科技史學會。2014.01.05 取自 http://sciencehistory.twbbs.org/?p=408
劉慶營 (2006) 簡要介紹魚翅加工技術。中國水產 12:65。
士潔 (2010) 魚翅。中興工程 106:121-122。
行政院農業委員會漁業署 (2011) 《鯊魚知多少?漁業觀察員鯊魚魚種辨識手冊》。行政院農業委員會漁業署,台北。64頁。
Baum, J. K. and Myers, R. A. (2004) Shifting baselines and the decline of pelagic sharks in the Gulf of Mexico. Ecology Letters 7: 135-145.
Baum, J. K., Kehler, D. and Myers, R. A. (2005) Robust estimates of decline for pelagic shark populations in the Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico. Fisheries 30 (10): 27-29.
Burgess, G. H., Beerkircher, L. R., Cailliet, G. M., Carlson, J. K., Cortés, E., Goldman, K. J., Grubbs, R. D., Musick, J. A., Musyl, M. K., Simpfendorfer, C. A. (2005) Is the collapse of shark populations in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico real? Fisheries 30 (10): 19-26.
Casey, J. M. and Myers, R. A. (1998) Near extinction of a large, widely distributed fish. Science 281: 690-692.
Clarke, S. (2004) Understanding pressures on fishery resources through trade statistics: a pilot study of four products in the Chinese dried seafood market. Fish and Fisheries 5: 53-74.
Clarke, S. C., Magnussen, J. E., Abercrombie, D. L., McAllister, M. K., Shivji, M. S. (2006) Identification of shark species composition and proportion in the Hong Kong shark fin market based on molecular genetics and trade records. Conservation Biology 20 (1): 201-211.
Compagno, L. J. V. (1984a) FAO Species Catalogue. Vol. 4. Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Part 1 - Hexanchiformes to Lamniformes. FAO Fisheries Synopsis 125 (4/1): 1-249. FAO, Rome.
Compagno, L. J. V. (1984b) FAO Species Catalogue. Vol. 4. Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Part 2 - Carcharhiniformes. FAO Fisheries Synopsis 125 (4/2): 251-655. FAO, Rome.
Compagno, L. J. V., Ebert, D. A. and Smale, M. J. (1989) Guide to the sharks and rays of southern Africa. New Holland (Publ.) Ltd., London. 158 p.
Compagno, L. J. V. (1998) Sphyrnidae. Hammerhead and bonnethead sharks. p. 1361-1366. In K. E. Carpenter and V. H. Niem (eds.) FAO identification guide for fishery purposes. The Living Marine Resources of the Western Central Pacific. FAO, Rome.
Compagno, L. J. V. and Last, P. R. (1999) Pristidae. Sawfishes. p. 1410-1417. In K.E. Carpenter and V. Niem (eds.) FAO identification guide for fishery purposes. The Living Marine Resources of the Western Central Pacific. FAO, Rome.
Compagno, L. J. V., Dando, M. and Fowler, S. (2005) A Field Guide to the Sharks of the World. Harper Collins Publishing Ltd., London, 368 p.
Compagno, L. J. V., Last, P. R., Stevens, J. D., Alava, M. N. R. (2005) Checklist of Philippine Chondrichthyes. CSIRO Marine Laboratories, Rept. 243. 101 p.
Dudley, S. F. J. and Simpfendorfer, C. A. (2006) Population status of 14 shark species caught in the protective gillnets off KwaZulu-Natal beaches, South Africa, 1978-2003. Marine and Freshwater Research 57: 225-240.
Dulvy, N. K., Baum, J. K., Clarke, S., Compagno, L. J. V., Cortés, E., Domingo, A., Fordham, S., Fowler, S., Francis, M. P., Gibson, C., Martínez, J., Musick, J. A., Soldo, A., Stevens, J. D., Valenti, S. (2008) You can swim but you can’t hide: the global status and conservation of oceanic pelagic sharks and rays. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.
FAO, Fisheries Department (1994) World review of highly migratory species and straddling stocks. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 337. FAO, Rome. 70 p.
Garrick, J. A. F. (1982) Sharks of the genus Carcharhinus. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Technical Report NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) Circular No. 194 p.
Garrison, T. (2013) Oceanography: An Invitation to Marine Science. 8th ed. Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning, Belmont, USA. 640p.
Graham, K. J., Andrew, N. L. and Hodgson, K. E. (2001) Changes in relative abundance of sharks and rays on Australian South East Fishery trawl grounds after twenty years of fishing. Marine and Freshwater Research 52: 549-561.
Hebert, P. D. N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L., de Waard, J. R. (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 270: 313-322.
Holmes, B. H., Steinke, D. and Ward, R. D. (2009) Identification of shark and ray fins using DNA barcoding. Fisheries Research 95: 280-288.
Joung, S.-J. and Hsu, H.-H. (2005) Reproduction and Embryonic Development of the Shprtfin Mako, Isurus oxyrinchus Rafinesque, 1810, in the Northwestern Pacific. Zoological Studies 44 (4): 487-496.
Joung, S.-J., Hsu, H.-H. and Liu, K.-M. (2013, October) Shark species identification based on morphological characteristics and dermal denticles. In M. D. Santos and S.-J. Joung (Chairs), Shark Conservation and Management. The 14th APEC Roundtable Meeting on the Involvement of the Business/Private Sector in the Sustainability of the Marine Environment, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lack, M. and Sant, G. (2006a) World shark catch, production & trade 1990-2003. TRAFFIC Oceania. Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australian Government. 29 p.
Lack, M. and Sant, G. (2006b) Confronting Shark Conservation Head On. TRAFFIC International: Cambridge.
Last, P. R. and Stevens, J. D. (1994) Sharks and rays of Australia. CSIRO, Australia. 513 p.
Lavenberg, R. J., Grove, J. S. and Seigel, J. A. (1994) Conservation alert: Status of fisheries for Galápagos sharks, with a checklist of known species. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.
Librado, P. and Rozas, J. (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25 (11): 1451-1452.
Lubbock, R. and Edwards, A. (1981) The fishes of Saint Paul’s Rocks. Journal of Fish Biology. 18: 135-157.
Menni, R. C., Ringuelet, R. A. and Aramburu, R. H. (1984) Peces marinos de la Argentina y Uruguay. Editorial Hemisferio Sur S.A. Buenos, Aires, Argentina. 359 p.
Menni, R. C. and Lucifora, L. O. (2007) Condrictios de la Argentina y Uruguay. ProBiota, FCNyM, UNLP, Serie Técnica-Didáctica, La Plata, Argentina, 11: 1-15.
Mundy, B. C. (2005) Checklist of the fishes of the Hawaiian Archipelago. Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology 6: 1-704.
Mundy-Taylor, V. and Crook, V. (2013) Into the deep: Implementing CITES measures for commercially-valuable sharks and manta rays. A TRAFFIC Report prepared for the European Commission.
Muus, B. J. and Nielsen, J. G. (1999) Sea fish. Scandinavian Fishing Year Book, Hedehusene, Denmark. 340 p.
Myers, R. F. (1991) Micronesian reef fishes. 2nd ed. Coral Graphics, Barrigada, Guam. 298 p.
Nelson, J. S. (2006) FISHES of the WORLD. 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA. 601p.
Park, S. H., Zhang, Y., Piao, H., Yu, D. H., Jeong, H. J., Yoo, G. Y., Jo, T.-H., Hwang, J.-J. (2009) Sequences of the Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit I (COI) Gene are Suitable for Species Identification of Korean Calliphorinae Flies of Forensic Importance (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Journal of Forensic Sciences 54 (5): 1131-1134.
Payne, J., Cubitt, G., Lau, D., Langub, J. (2000) This is Borneo. New Holland Publishers Ltd., London, 170 p.
Ratnasingham, S. and Hebert, P. D. N. (2007) BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (www.barcodinglife.org). Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 355-364.
Robbins, W. D., Hisano, M., Connolly, S. R., Choat, J. H. (2006) Ongoing collapse of coral-reef shark populations. Current Biology 16: 2314-2319.
Robins, C. R. and Ray, G. C. (1986) A field guide to Atlantic coast fishes of North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, U.S.A. 354 p.
Rocha, L. A., Craig, M. T. and Bowen, B. W. (2007) Phylogeography and the conservation of coral reef fishes. Coral Reefs 26: 501-512.
Rozas, J. (2009) DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis Using DnaSP. Bioinformatics for DNA Sequence Analysis, Methods in Molecular Biology 537: 337-350.
Smith, C. L. (1997) National Audubon Society field guide to tropical marine fishes of the Caribbean, the Gulf of Mexico, Florida, the Bahamas, and Bermuda. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., New York. 720 p.
Sommer, C., Schneider, W. and Poutiers, J.-M. (1996) FAO species identification field guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of Somalia. FAO, Rome. 376 p.
Stevens, J. D. and McLoughlin, K. J. (1991) Distribution, size and sex composition, reproductive biology and diet of sharks from northern Australia. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 42: 151-199.
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., Kumar, S. (2011) MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28 (10): 2731-2739.
Ward, R. D., Zemlak, T. S., Innes, B. H., Last, P. R., Hebert, P. D. N. (2005) DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 360: 1847-1851.
Ward, R. D., Holmes, B. H., White, W. T., Last, P. R. (2008) DNA barcoding Australasian chondrichthyans: results and potential uses in conservation. Marine and Freshwater Research 59: 57-71.
White, W. T., Last, P. R., Compagno, L. J. V. (2005) Description of a new species of weasel shark, Hemigaleus australiensis (Carcharhiniformes: Hemigaleidae) from Australian waters. Zootaxa 1077: 37-49.
White, W. T., Last P. R., Stevens J. D., Yearsley G. K., Fahmi, Dharmadi (2006) Economically important sharks and rays of Indonesia. [Hiu dan pari yang bernilai ekonomis penting di Indonesia]. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia. 329p.
White, W. T. (2012) A redescription of Carcharhinus dussumieri and C. sealei, with resurrection of C. coatesi and C. tjutjot as valid species (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhinidae). Zootaxa 3241: 1-34.
Whitley, G. P. (1939) Taxonomic notes on sharks and rays. Australian Zoologist 9: 227-262.
Wu, M.-F. (2013, October) Chinese Taipei’s conservation and management of shark resources and responses to the decisions of CITES CoP 16. In S. Tanaka and H. D. Phan (Chairs), Shark Conservation and Management. The 14th APEC Roundtable Meeting on the Involvement of the Business/Private Sector in the Sustainability of the Marine Environment, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yamada, U., Shirai S., Irie T., Tokimura M., Deng S., Zheng Y., Li C., Kim Y. U., Kim, Y. S. (1995) Names and illustrations of fishes from the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea. Overseas Fishery Cooperation Foundation, Tokyo, Japan. 288 p.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57923-
dc.description.abstract魚翅是整尾鯊魚個體中經濟價值最高的部位,長久以來在東亞以及東南亞國家中食用魚翅的風氣相當盛行,在中國更是一項流傳了數百年的珍貴菜餚;本研究基於對軟骨魚類保育的觀念,欲探討台灣市售魚翅種類之組成。自國內各大漁港與都會區採樣或購買的魚翅,包括新鮮魚翅、乾製魚翅、水發魚翅、罐頭和調理包魚翅等,由於沒有完整的個體,難以靠形態鑑定種類,故採取分子生物學的方式,利用生命條碼鑑定所收集到的樣本;選用的 DNA 片段為粒線體 COI 基因。研究結果顯示,新鮮魚翅、乾製魚翅與水發魚翅皆能以此方法成功鑑定物種;但罐頭及調理包魚翅則未能成功放大所需之 DNA 片段。種類分析方面,在 1170 個樣本中,成功鑑定了 686 個,總共發現 46 個物種,分屬 8 目 14 科 21 屬。分析的樣本當中,數量最多的物種是鋸峰齒鮫,其次依序是平滑白眼鮫、灰鯖鮫、深海狐鮫、紅肉丫髻鮫和淺海狐鮫。保育狀況方面,本研究鑑定出之物種,根據國際自然保護聯盟的評估與分類,極危的物種佔了 2.2 %,瀕危的物種佔了 4.3 %,易危的物種佔了 32.6 %,近危的物種佔了 39.1 %,無危的物種佔了 15.2 %,數據缺乏的物種佔了 4.3 %,未評估的物種佔了 2.2 %。
除了種類鑑定之外,本研究亦分析了各 COI 序列之間的演化距離,結果顯示,各物種內的演化距離分布為 0.002-0.035,平均 0.007;屬內為 0.003-0.102,平均 0.029;科內為 0.003-0.105,平均 0.054。之後將本研究所採集而來的單倍型序列用以建構親緣關係樹,發現各物種在親緣關係樹中均能被分離開,因此證實了 COI 序列對於軟骨魚類的種類鑑定具有很好的效果。
最後,在針對八個受區域漁業管理組織規範的物種之親緣關係分析結果顯示,淺海狐鮫、狐鮫、平滑白眼鮫、紅肉丫髻鮫、丫髻鮫等五個物種在不同的洋區有遺傳分化之現象;深海狐鮫、污斑白眼鮫、八鰭丫髻鮫此三個物種則無。
經由本研究可得知,利用粒線體 COI 基因當作生命條碼分析市售魚翅為一快速、有效且準確的方法;此方法將在漁業管理以及保育工作上能夠起到很好的輔助效果。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractShark fin is the most valuable part in a whole shark body, the custom of eating shark fin is very popular in East and South-East Asia, and it has been counted a traditional noble delicacy in China for centuries. This study aims to analyze constitution of species in Taiwan market fins. We collected or purchased shark fin samples from fishing ports or metropolis in Taiwan, including fresh fin, dried fin, soaked fin, canned fin, and pack fin. Because of lacking key features, it is impossible to identify species of the samples by morphological method. We used the molecular tool- DNA barcode (the gene marker is mitochondrial COI gene) to accomplish it. The results showed that this method is appropriate in species identification of fresh fin, dried fin, and soaked fin, but inappropriate in canned fin and pack fin. In the results of species analysis, we found 46 species in the 686 successfully indentified samples of the all 1170 samples. The 46 species belong to 8 orders, 14 families, and 21 genera. In all the samples we analyzed, the most plentiful species is Blue shark, subsequently are Silky shark, Shortfin mako, Bigeye thresher, Scalloped hammerhead, and Pelagic thresher. In status of conservation, according to the evaluation and classification by IUCN, critically endangered species account for 2.2 %, endangered species account for 4.3 %, vulnerable species account for 32.6 %, near threatened species account for 39.1 %, least concern species account for 15.2 %, data deficient species account for 4.3 %, not evaluated species account for 2.2 % in all the species we found in this study.
In addition to species identification, we also calculated evolutionary distances of the COI sequences. The results showed that within-species distances ranged from 0.002 to 0.035, with the mean value on 0.007; within-genus distances ranged from 0.003 to 0.102, with the mean value on 0.029; and within-family distances ranged from 0.003 to 0.105, with the mean value on 0.054. Furthermore, all the species can be perfectly separated in phylogenetic trees which are constructed by the haplotypes, it indicated that capability of COI gene in species identification of chondrichthians is very good. Moreover, phylogenetic analyses showed regional genetic divergences in Pelagic thresher, Thresher, Silky shark, Scalloped hammerhead, and Smooth hammerhead; but no divergence in Bigeye thresher, Oceanic whitetip shark, and Great hammerhead.
We affirmed that using mitochondrial COI gene as a DNA barcode to identify chondrichthian species is a fast, effective, and accurate method, which will be helpful for fishery management and species conservation.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T07:11:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-103-R99241217-1.pdf: 3082469 bytes, checksum: 8baffe4d7665a9a51b5ca9f641b38a69 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014
en
dc.description.tableofcontents致謝 .............................................................................................................................. i
摘要 ............................................................................................................................. ii
Abstract ....................................................................................................................... iv
目錄 ............................................................................................................................ vi
圖目錄 ...................................................................................................................... viii
表目錄 ......................................................................................................................... x
附錄目錄 .................................................................................................................... xi
一、前言 ..................................................................................................................... 1
二、材料與方法 ......................................................................................................... 5
2.1 樣本採集 ...................................................................................................... 5
2.2 種類鑑定 ...................................................................................................... 5
2.3 演化距離之探討 .......................................................................................... 8
2.4 粒線體 COI 基因鑑別力之檢驗 ............................................................... 8
2.5 八個受區域漁業管理組織規範的物種之地域性遺傳分化情形檢驗 ...... 9
三、結果 ................................................................................................................... 10
3.1 樣本收集狀況與種類鑑定成功率 ............................................................ 10
3.2 鑑定結果 .................................................................................................... 10
3.3 各物種保育現況分析 ................................................................................ 11
3.4 演化距離之分析 ........................................................................................ 13
3.5 粒線體 COI 基因鑑別力檢驗之結果 ..................................................... 14
3.6 受規範物種之地域性遺傳分化情形檢驗結果 ........................................ 14
四、討論 ................................................................................................................... 18
4.1 利用 DNA 條碼鑑定魚翅物種之實用性 ................................................ 18
4.2 鑑定結果與保育狀況之討論 .................................................................... 19
4.3 演化距離之討論 ........................................................................................ 25
4.4 粒線體 COI 基因對於軟骨魚類物種的鑑別力與實用性之討論 ......... 27
4.5 受規範物種的親緣關係與地域性遺傳分化之討論 ................................ 28
五、結論 ................................................................................................................... 32
六、參考文獻 ........................................................................................................... 33
七、圖 ....................................................................................................................... 39
八、表 ....................................................................................................................... 65
九、附錄 .................................................................................................................... 75
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title利用生命條碼分析臺灣市售魚翅種類與其在漁業管理和物種保育上之應用zh_TW
dc.titleSpecies Identification of Shark Fins in Taiwan Markets by Using DNA Barcode: the Application to Fishery Management and Species Conservationen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear102-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee莊守正,吳金鎮,陳義雄
dc.subject.keywordDNA 條碼,魚翅,粒線體 COI 基因,親緣關係,遺傳分化,漁業管理,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordDNA barcode,shark fin,mitochondrial COI gene,phylogenetics,genetic divergence,fishery management,en
dc.relation.page76
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2014-07-04
dc.contributor.author-college理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept海洋研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:海洋研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-103-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
3.01 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved