請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57761
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇忠楨(Jung-Jeng Su) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yen-Tsun Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃彥尊 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T07:02:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-04 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2020-07-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 郭猛德、蕭庭訓、王政騰。2008。養豬三段式廢水與污泥處理技術。畜牧半月刊81 : 5,頁29-38。 Abbas, S. Z., M. Rafatullah, N. Ismail, and M. I. Syakir. 2018. The behavior of membrane-less sediment microbial fuel cells in terms of bioremediation and power generation. Malays J Microbiol. 14 (2): 108-112. Aelterman, P., K. Rabaey, H. T. Pham, N. Boon, and W. Verstraete. 2006. Continuous electricity generation at high voltages and currents using stacked microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (10): 3388-3394. Ahn, Y. and B. E. Logan. 2010. Effectiveness of domestic wastewater treatment using microbial fuel cells at ambient and mesophilic temperatures. Bioresour. Technol. 101 (2): 469-475. Akyildiz, I. F. and X. Wang. 2005. A survey on wireless mesh networks. IEEE Communications magazine 43 (9): S23-S30. Angenent, L. T., K. Karim, M. H. Al-Dahhan, B. A. Wrenn, and R.omíguez-Espinosa. 2004. Production of bioenergy and biochemicals from industrial and agricultural wastewater. TRENDS in Biotechnology 22 (9): 477-485. APHA. 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th edn. American Public Health Association (APHA)/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington. Basura, V., P. Beattie, and S. Holdcroft. 1998. Solid-state electrochemical oxygen reduction at Pt∣ Nafion® 117 and Pt∣ BAM3G™ 407 interfaces. J. Electroanal. Chem. 458 (1-2): 1-5. Bose, D., S. Sridharan, H. Dhawan, P. Vijay, and M. Gopinath. 2019. Biomass derived activated carbon cathode performance for sustainable power generation from Microbial Fuel Cells. Fuel. 236: 325-337. Bond, D. R., D. E. Holmes, L. M. Tender, and D. R. Lovley. 2002. Electrode-reducing microorganisms that harvest energy from marine sediments. Science 295 (5554): 483-485. Cheng, K. Y., G. Ho, and R. Cord-Ruwisch. 2011. Novel methanogenic rotatable bioelectrochemical system operated with polarity inversion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (2): 796-802. Cheng, S., H. Liu, and B. E. Logan. 2006. Increased power generation in a continuous flow MFC with advective flow through the porous anode and reduced electrode spacing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (7): 2426-2432. Cheng, S., H. Liu, and B. E. Logan. 2006. Power densities using different cathode catalysts (Pt and CoTMPP) and polymer binders (Nafion and PTFE) in single chamber microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (1): 364-369. Choi, J. and Y. Ahn. 2013. Continuous electricity generation in stacked air cathode microbial fuel cell treating domestic wastewater. J Environ. Manage. 130: 146-152. Chouler, J., I. Bentley, F. Vaz, A. O’Fee, P. J. Cameron, and M. Di Lorenzo. 2017. Exploring the use of cost-effective membrane materials for Microbial Fuel Cell based sensors. Electrochimica. Acta. 231: 319-326. Clauwaert, P., and W. Verstraete. 2009. Methanogenesis in membraneless microbial electrolysis cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 82 (5): 829-836. Donovan, C., A. Dewan, D. Heo, and H. Beyenal. 2008. Batteryless, wireless sensor powered by a sediment microbial fuel cell. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (22): 8591-8596. Du, Z., H. Li, and T. Gu. 2007. A state of the art review on microbial fuel cells: a promising technology for wastewater treatment and bioenergy. Biotechnol. Adv. 25 (5):464-482. Fernández, F., J. Lobato, J. Villasenor, M. Rodrigo, and P. Canizares. 2014. Microbial fuel cell: the definitive technological approach for valorizing organic wastes, Environment, energy and climate change I. Springer. p. 287-316. Feng, Y., X. Wang, B. E. Logan, and H. Lee. 2008. Brewery wastewater treatment using air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 78 (5): 873-880. Flexer, V., J. Chen, B. C. Donose, P. Sherrell, G. G. Wallace, and J. Keller. 2013. The nanostructure of three-dimensional scaffolds enhances the current density of microbial bioelectrochemical systems. Energy Environ. Sci. 6 (4):1291-1298. Guo, K., A. Prevoteau, S. A. Patil, and K. Rabaey. 2015. Engineering electrodes for microbial electrocatalysis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 33:149-156. Guo, K., B. C. Donose, A. H. Soeriyadi, A. Prévoteau, S. A. Patil, S. Freguia, J. J. Gooding, and K. Rabaey. 2014. Flame oxidation of stainless steel felt enhances anodic biofilm formation and current output in bioelectrochemical systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (12): 7151-7156. Guo, K., A. H. Soeriyadi, S. A. Patil, A. Prévoteau, S. Freguia, J. J. Gooding, and K. Rabaey. 2014. Surfactant treatment of carbon felt enhances anodic microbial electrocatalysis in bioelectrochemical systems. Electrochem. Commun. 39: 1-4. Goto, Y. and N. Yoshida. 2019. Scaling up Microbial Fuel Cells for Treating Swine Wastewater. Water 11 (9):1803. Harnisch, F. and U. Schroder. 2009. Selectivity versus mobility: separation of anode and cathode in microbial bioelectrochemical systems. Chem. Sus. Chem. 2 (10): 921-926. He, G., Y. Gu, S. He, U. Schröder, S. Chen, and H. Hou. 2011. Effect of fiber diameter on the behavior of biofilm and anodic performance of fiber electrodes in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol. 102 (22):10763-10766. Hsu, L. C., J. Fang, D. A. Borca-Tasciuc, R. W. Worobo, and C. I. Moraru. 2013. Effect of micro-and nanoscale topography on the adhesion of bacterial cells to solid surfaces. Applied and environmental microbiology 79 (8): 2703-2712. Ieropoulos, I., J. Greenman, and C. Melhuish. 2003. Imitating metabolism: Energy autonomy in biologically inspired robots. In: Proceedings of the AISB. p 191-194. Karube, I., T. Matsunaga, S. Mitsuda, and S. Suzuki. 1977. Microbial electrode BOD sensors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 19 (10): 1535-1547. Liu, H., S. Cheng, and B. E. Logan. 2005. Power generation in fed-batch microbial fuel cells as a function of ionic strength, temperature, and reactor configuration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (14): 5488-5493. Liu, H., and B. E. Logan. 2004. Electricity generation using an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (14): 4040-4046. Liu, H., R. Ramnarayanan, and B. E. Logan. 2004. Production of electricity during wastewater treatment using a single chamber microbial fuel cell. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (7): 2281-2285. Logan, B., S. Cheng, V. Watson, and G. Estadt. 2007. Graphite fiber brush anodes for increased power production in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (9): 3341-3346. Logan, B. E. 2008. Microbial fuel cells. John Wiley Sons. Logan, B. E. 2009. Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7 (5): 375-381. Logan, B. E., B. Hamelers, R. Rozendal, U. Schröder, J. Keller, S. Freguia, P. Aelterman, W. Verstraete, and K. Rabaey. 2006. Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (17): 5181-5192. Marassi, R. J., R. S. Hermanny, G. C. Silva, F. T. Silva, and T. C. B. Paiva. 2019. Electricity production and treatment of high-strength dairy wastewater in a microbial fuel cell using acclimated electrogenic consortium. International Int J Environ Sci Technol. 16 (11): 7339-7348. McInerney, P. 1980. Satanic conceits in Frankenstein and Wuthering heights. Nineteenth Century Contexts 4 (1): 1-15. Min, B., J. Kim, S. Oh, J. M. Regan, and B. E. Logan. 2005. Electricity generation from swine wastewater using microbial fuel cells. Water Res. 39 (20): 4961-4968. Min, B., and B. E. Logan. 2004. Continuous electricity generation from domestic wastewater and organic substrates in a flat plate microbial fuel cell. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (21): 5809-5814. Mitik‐Dineva, N., J. Wang, R. C. Mocanasu, P. R. Stoddart, R. J. Crawford, and E. P. Ivanova. 2008. Impact of nano‐topography on bacterial attachment. Biotechnology Journal: Healthcare Nutrition Technology 3 (4): 536-544. Namisnyk, A. and J. Zhu. 2003. A survey of electrochemical super-capacitor technology. In: Australian Universities Power Engineering Conference Ogugbue, C., E. Ebode, and S. Leera. 2015. Electricity Generation from Swine Wastewater Using Microbial Fuel Cell. J. Ecol. Eng. 16: 26-33. Oh, S. E. and B. E. Logan. 2006. Proton exchange membrane and electrode surface areas as factors that affect power generation in microbial fuel cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 70(2):162-169. Parthasarathy, A., S. Srinivasan, A. J. Appleby, and C. R. Martin. 1992. Temperature dependence of the electrode kinetics of oxygen reduction at the platinum/Nafion® interface—a microelectrode investigation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 139 (9): 2530. Pham, T. H., K. Rabaey, P. Aelterman, P. Clauwaert, L. De Schamphelaire, N. Boon, and W. Verstraete. 2006. Microbial Fuel Cells in Relation to Conventional Anaerobic Digestion Technology. Engineering in Life Sciences 6 (3): 285-292. Picot, M., L. Lapinsonnière, M. Rothballer, and F. Barrière. 2011. Graphite anode surface modification with controlled reduction of specific aryl diazonium salts for improved microbial fuel cells power output. Biosens. Bioelectron. 28 (1): 181-188. Rabaey, K. and W. Verstraete. 2005. Microbial fuel cells: novel biotechnology for energy generation. Trends Biotechnol. 23 (6): 291-298. Rahimnejad, M., A. Adhami, S. Darvari, A. Zirepour, and S.-E. Oh. 2015. Microbial fuel cell as new technology for bioelectricity generation: A review. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 54 (3): 745-756. Rezaei, F., T. L. Richard, R. A. Brennan, and B. E. Logan. 2007. Substrate-enhanced microbial fuel cells for improved remote power generation from sediment-based systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (11): 4053-4058. Rizzello, L., R. Cingolani, and P. P. Pompa. 2013. Nanotechnology tools for antibacterial materials. Nanomedicine 8 (5): 807-821. Santoro, C., C. Arbizzani, B. Erable, and I. Ieropoulos. 2017. Microbial fuel cells: From fundamentals to applications. A review. J Power Sources. 356: 225-244. Su, J.-C., S.-C. Tang, P.-J. Su, and J.-J. Su. 2019. Real-Time Monitoring of Micro-Electricity Generation Through the Voltage Across a Storage Capacitor Charged by a Simple Microbial Fuel Cell Reactor with Fast Fourier Transform. Energies. 12 (13): 2610. Tender, L. M., C. E. Reimers, H. A. Stecher, D. E. Holmes, D. R. Bond, D. A. Lowy, K. Pilobello, S. J. Fertig, and D. R. Lovley. 2002. Harnessing microbially generated power on the seafloor. Nat. Biotechnol. 20 (8): 821-825. Torres, C. I. 2014. On the importance of identifying, characterizing, and predicting fundamental phenomena towards microbial electrochemistry applications. Current opinion in biotechnology 27: 107-114. Wang, X., Y. Feng, and H. Lee. 2008. Electricity production from beer brewery wastewater using single chamber microbial fuel cell. Water Sci. Technol. 57 (7): 1117-1121. Watanabe, K. 2008. Recent developments in microbial fuel cell technologies for sustainable bioenergy. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 106 (6): 528-536. Watanabe, K., M. Manefield, M. Lee, and A. Kouzuma. 2009. Electron shuttles in biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 20 (6): 633-641. Wei, J., P. Liang, and X. Huang. 2011. Recent progress in electrodes for microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol. 102 (20): 9335-9344. Wilkinson, S. 2000. “Gastrobots”—benefits and challenges of microbial fuel cells in foodpowered robot applications. Auton. Robot. 9 (2): 99-111. Xie, X., M. Ye, L. Hu, N. Liu, J. R. McDonough, W. Chen, H. N. Alshareef, C. S. Criddle, and Y. Cui. 2012. Carbon nanotube-coated macroporous sponge for microbial fuel cell electrodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 5 (1): 5265-5270. Yamamoto, S., K. Suzuki, Y. Araki, H. Mochihara, T. Hosokawa, H. Kubota, Y. Chiba, O. Rubaba, Y. Tashiro, and H. Futamata. 2014. Dynamics of different bacterial communities are capable of generating sustainable electricity from microbial fuel cells with organic waste. Microbes Environ. 29 (2): 145-153. Yanase, Y., A. Araki, H. Suzuki, T. Tsutsui, T. Kimura, K. Okamoto, T. Nakatani, T. Hiragun, and M. Hide. 2010. Development of an optical fiber SPR sensor for living cell activation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 25 (5): 1244-1247. Zhang, T., H. Nie, T. S. Bain, H. Lu, M. Cui, O. L. Snoeyenbos-West, A. E. Franks, K. P. Nevin, T. P. Russell, and D. R. Lovley. 2013. Improved cathode materials for microbial electrosynthesis. Energy Environ. Sci. 6 (1): 217-224. Zhang, X., S. Cheng, P. Liang, X. Huang, and B. E. Logan. 2011. Scalable air cathode microbial fuel cells using glass fiber separators, plastic mesh supporters, and graphite fiber brush anodes. Bioresour. Technol. 102 (1): 372-375. Zhao, F., F. Harnisch, U. Schröder, F. Scholz, P. Bogdanoff, and I. Herrmann. 2006. Challenges and constraints of using oxygen cathodes in microbial fuel cells. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (17): 5193-5199. Zhou, M., M. Chi, J. Luo, H. He, and T. Jin. 2011. An overview of electrode materials in microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources 196 (10): 4427-4435. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57761 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 廢(污)水需經過妥善處理,且符合環保署放流水標準才能排放至表面水體,將沉積物微生物燃料電池(Sediment Microbial Fuel Cell, SMFC)應用於廢水處理程序,在常溫常壓下利用陽極槽內進行厭氧消化程序,污泥微生物將廢水中有機質降解,同時產生沼氣與微電流。本研究目的主要是探討沉積物微生物燃料電池應用於養豬廢水處理時,陰極槽內水量與燃料電池之電流、電壓間之交互關係;其次在處理程序中,陽極槽與陰極槽間之接觸面積與燃料電池之電流、電壓間之交互關係,同時檢測與分析其產氣量與甲烷濃度,養豬廢水於處理前、後之水質指標變化,建立相關之最適操作參數,以利未來在廢水處理場上之應用。針對陰極槽內水量與燃料電池產電之交互關係試驗,當陽極槽的養豬廢水容積為4 L時,分別使用不同的陰極槽清水與陽極槽養豬廢水之容積比(陰極:陽極 = 0.625: 1、0.25: 1及0.0625 :1)進行研究試驗。有關陽極槽與陰極槽間之接觸面積與燃料電池產電之交互關係試驗,其中槽體底部表面積為0.0314 m2,分別使用不同通透膜表面積(4.52 cm2、3.39 cm2及1.13 cm2) 進行研究試驗。所使用之燃料電池反應槽接連線上即時記錄器,連續紀錄電流與電壓數據。試驗結果顯示,當養豬廢水容積為4 L,且兩槽容積比為0.0625 :1時,其平均總產氣量5546 mL,顯著高於其他兩組,此燃料電池平均電容功率密度為0.538 W/m2,也是顯著高於其他兩組。廢水之化學需氧量(COD)、生化需氧量(BOD)及懸浮固體(SS)之平均去除率分別為60 %、70 %及85 %。當過濾膜表面積為3.39 cm2與4.52 cm2時,此燃料電池平均電容功率密度為0.495~0.538 W/m2,為三組中最高。然而,當濾膜表面積為1.13 cm2時,此燃料電池平均電容功率密度為0.055 W/m2,三組中最低,但是平均總產氣量12370 mL,為三組中最高。本試驗的陰陽極槽體積為4 L,較其他研究文獻的燃料電池體積大,故本研究成果若能結合現場廢水處理系統的厭氣槽設施,則可增加畜牧廢水處理的經濟效益。達到廢水處理、沼氣生產及微電力回收利用的三贏目標。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The wastewater (or sewage) needs to be properly treated and meets the EPA’s effluent standard before it can be discharged to the surface water body. The sediment microbial fuel cell (SMFC) can be applied to the wastewater treatment process under normal temperature and pressure conditions. The anaerobic digestion is carried out in the anode chamber while the sludge microorganisms degrade the organic matter in the wastewater to produce biogas and micro-electricity simultaneously. The objective of this study was primarily to explore the interaction between the amount of tap water in the cathode chamber and the micro-electricity generation of the microbial fuel cell with piggery wastewater. Secondly, the relationship between the permeable membrane surface areas of the anode chamber and the cathode chamber and the micro-electricity generation of the microbial fuel cell. Moreover, the amount of accumulated biogas production and methane contents were also determined at the same time as well as the water quality of piggery wastewater before and after the time-course experiments to establish the optimal operation parameters for further in situ applications. The operation volume of the anode chamber was 4 L. For the time-course experiments according to the different volumes of tap water in the cathode chamber of the SMFC, different ratios of tap water of the cathode chamber and piggery wastewater of the anode chamber were used, i.e. cathode: anode (v/v) = 0.625: 1, 0.25: 1 and 0.0625: 1. The bottom area of the cathode chamber was 0.0314 m2. For the time-course experiments according to the different permeable membrane surface areas between the cathode and anode chambers of the SMFC, different permeable membrane surface areas were used, i.e. 4.52 cm2, 3.39 cm2, and 1.13 cm2. All the SMFCs were connected to the real-time recording module for continuously recording the current and voltage data. The results showed that when the ratio of tap water and piggery wastewater was 0.0625:1, the total biogas production (5546 mL) and power density of the SMFC (0.538 W/m2) were significantly higher than the other groups and the average removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and suspended solids (SS) was 60%, 70%, and 85%, respectively. When the permeable surface area was 3.39 cm2 and 4.52 cm2, the SMFC achieved the highest average power density of 0.495~0.538 W/m2. The SMFC achieved the highest average accumulated biogas production of 12370 mL, but the lowest power density of the SMFC (0.055 W/m2) when the permeable membrane surface area was 1.13 cm2. The scale of the SMFC of this study was 4 L, which is larger than the scale of the other studies. Thus, if the SMFC can be integrated with an in-situ piggery wastewater treatment system, the economic efficiency of the piggery wastewater treatment can be increased as well as a win-win-win goal of wastewater treatment, biogas production, and micro-electricity recycling can be achieved. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T07:02:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1707202011442900.pdf: 38375921 bytes, checksum: 81f224e619b56974ce1e4ecb8098f0ab (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i 謝誌 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract v 目錄 vii 圖目錄 x 表目錄 xii 第壹章、 研究動機與目的 1 第貳章、 文獻回顧 2 一、 微生物燃料電池 2 (一) 基本原理 2 (二) 功率密度 5 (三) 輸出電流形式 13 (四) MFC反應槽類型 14 (五) 微生物燃料電池的電化學 15 (六) MFC之應用 16 二、 廢水處理 21 (一) 厭氧處理的研究發展 21 第參章、 材料與方法 23 一、 直立雙槽式微生物燃料電池 23 二、 微生物燃料電池的有機質來源和污泥接種 23 三、 試驗設置與流程 23 四、 處理組別及操作條件 25 (一) 沉積物微生物燃料電池初始試驗 25 (二) 最佳操作參數試驗 25 五、 樣品紀錄與採集 28 (一) 電流與電壓紀錄 28 (二) 氣體樣品採集 28 (三) 養豬廢水樣品採集 28 六、 測定項目與分析方法 29 (一) 電流與電壓 29 (二) 化學需氧量(Chemical Oxygen Demand, COD) 29 (三) 生化需氧量(Biochemical Oxygen Demand, BOD) 30 (四) 懸浮固形物檢測(Suspended Solids, SS) 32 (五) pH值之檢測 32 (六) 電導度(Electricity Conductivity, E.C.)之檢測 33 (七) 氣相層析儀分析 (Gas Chromatography, GC) 33 (八) 離子層析儀 (Ion Chromatography, IC) 33 (九) 每日產氣量分析 34 七、 統計分析 34 (一) 電流電壓變化以及產氣量差異分析 34 (二) 各項廢水水質分析 34 第肆章、 結果與討論 36 一、 沉積物微生物燃料電池初始試驗 36 (一) 電流電壓變化 36 (二) 每日產氣量以及甲烷濃度變化 37 (三) 陽極槽內養豬廢水水質變化 40 二、 最佳操作參數試驗 42 (一) 不同的陰極槽自來水容積對於燃料電池之產氣與產電效率試驗 42 (二) 不同陽極槽與陰極槽間液體接觸面積之產氣與產電效率評估試驗 59 三、 與各文獻結果比較與討論 73 第伍章、 結論與未來研究方向 76 第陸章、 參考文獻 77 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 沉積物微生物燃料電池應用於養豬廢水厭氧消化之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Study of Sediment Microbial Fuel Cells (SMFCs) on Anaerobic Digestion of Piggery Wastewater | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 徐濟泰(JIH-TAY HSU),徐世勳(SHIH-HSUN HSU),蘇忠傑(JUNG-CHIEH SU) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 厭氧消化,沉積物微生物燃料電池,沼氣,微電力,再生能源, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | anaerobic digestion,sediment microbial fuel cell,biogas,micro- electricity,renewable energy, | en |
dc.relation.page | 84 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202001590 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2020-07-30 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 動物科學技術學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 動物科學技術學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-1707202011442900.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 37.48 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。