請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57582完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林晏州(Yann-Jou Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wan-Chen Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李宛臻 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T06:52:35Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-09-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-07-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-07-22 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.林大侯，（1984），個體經濟學，台北：六國出版社。
2.林晏州，（1984），遊憩者選擇遊憩區行為之研究，都市計畫，10，33-49。 3.林晏州，（1986），遊憩活動特性與需求之分析，都市計劃，13，107-140。 4.林晏州，（1987），玉山國家公園遊憩承載量及遊憩需求調查研究報告，南投：玉山國家公園管理處。 5.林晏州、蘇愛媜，（2012），太魯閣峽谷遊憩衝擊管理監測計畫（一），花蓮：太魯閣國家公園管理處。 6.陳水源，（1988），遊客遊憩需求與遊憩體驗之研討，戶外遊憩研究，1(3)，25-51。 7.陳昭明，（1981），台灣森林遊樂需求、資源、經營之調查與分析，台北：國立臺灣大學森林學系森林遊樂研究室。 8.Anderson, E. W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science, 12, 125-143. 9.Arin, T., & Kramern, R. A. (2002). Divers’ willingness to pay to visit marine sanctuaries: An exploratory study. Ocean and Coastal Management, 45, 171-183. 10.Baral, N., Stern, M. J., & Bhattarai, R. (2008). Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: Implication for sustainable park finance and local development. Ecological Economics, 66, 218-227. 11.Carmen, de R., & Carmen, C. (2008). Visitors’ experience, mood and satisfaction on a heritage context: Evidence from an interpretation center. Tourism Management, 29, 525-537. 12.Churchill, J. G. A., & Surpremant, C. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 491-504. 13.Clawson, M., & Knetsch, J. L. (1966). Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press. 14.Formica, S., & Uysal, M. (2006). Destination attractiveness based on supply and demand evaluations: An analytical framework. Journal of Travel Research, 44, 418-430. 15.Fornell, C. (1992). National customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience. Journal of Marketing, 56, 6- 21. 16.Gelcich, S., Amar, F., Valdebenito, A., Castilla, J. C., Fernandez, M., Godoy, C., & Biggs, D. (2013). Financing marine protected areas through visitor fees: Insight from tourists willing to pay in Chile. AMBIO, 42(8), 975-984. 17.Ghanbarpour, M. R., Sajjadi, S., Hajiseyedjavadi, S. T., & Chen, X. (2011). Investigation of visitors’ participation and willingness to pay for the Baba Aman recreational park, Iran. Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 3(6), 722-728. 18.Giraud, K. L. (2001). Fees and visitor preferences for the Chena River recreation area, Alaska. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 19(2), 98-112. 19.Hendon, W. (1981). Evaluating Urban Parks and Recreation. New York: Praeger Publishers. 20.Hu, Y., & Ritche J. R. B. (1993). Measuring destination attractiveness: A contextual approach. Journal of Travel Research, 32, 25-34. 21.Iatu, C., & Bulai, M. (2011). New approach in evaluating tourism attractiveness in the region of Moldavia (Romania). International Journal of Energy and Environment, 5(2), 165-174. 22.Kido, A., & Seidl A. (2008). Optimizing protected area entry fees across stakeholders: The Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve, Michoacan, Mexico. Environment and Development Economics, 13, 229-243. 23.Kotler, P. (1971). Marketing Decision Making: A Model Building Approach. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. 24.Kyle, G. T., Graefe, A. R., & Absher, J. D. (2002). Determining appropriate prices for recreation on public lands. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 20(2), 69-89. 25.Lee, C. K., Mjelde, J. W., & Kim, T. K. (2013). Estimating the effects of different admission fees on revenues for a mega-event using a contingent valuation method. Tourism Economics, 19(1), 147-159. 26.Loomis, J., & McTernan, J. (2014). Economic value of instream flow for non-commercial whitewater boating using recreation demand and contingent valuation method. Environmental management, 53, 510-519. 27.Mayo, E. J., & Jarvis, L. P. (1981). The Psychology of Leisure Travel: Effective Marketing and Selling of Travel Services. Boston, USA: CBI Publishing Company, Inc. 28.McCarville, R. E., Reiling, S. D., & White, C. M. (1996). The role of fairness in users’ assessments of first-time fees for a public recreation service. Leisure Science, 18(1), 61-76. 29.More, T., & Stevens, T. (2000). Do user fees exclude low-income people from resource-based recreation? Journal of Leisure Research, 32(3), 341-357. 30.Natalia, L. M., & Mercedes, S. (2013). Cognitive and affective determinants of satisfaction, willingness to pay, and loyalty in suburban parks. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 13(2), 375-384. 31.National Academy of Sciences. (1975). Assessing Demand for Outdoor Recreation. Washington D.C.: NAS. 32.Nuva, R., Shamsudin, M. N., Radam, A., & Shuib, A. (2009). Willingness to pay towards the conservation of ecotourism resources at Gunung Gede Pangrango National Park, West Java, Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(2), 173-186. 33.Oliver, R. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469. 34.Oliver, R. L. (2010). Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York: M. E. Sharpe, Inc. 35.Park, T., Bowker, J. M., & Leeworthy, V. R. (2002). Valuing snorkeling visits to the Florida Keys with stated and revealed preference models. Journal of Environment Management, 65(3), 301-312. 36.Peters, H., & Hawkins, J. P. (2009). Access to marine parks: A comparative study in willing to pay. Ocean & Coastal Management, 52, 219-228. 37.Reece, W. S. (2008). The Economics of Tourism. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 38.Reiling, S. D., Cheng, H. T., & Trott, C. (1992). Measuring the discriminatory impact associated with higher recreational fees. Leisure Science, 14, 121-137. 39.Reynisdottir, M., S., Song, H., & Agrusa, J. (2008). Willingness to pay entrance fees to natural attractions: An Icelandic case study. Tourism Management, 29, 1076-1083. 40.Richer, J. R., & Christensen, N. A. (1999). Appropriate fees for wilderness day use: Pricing decisions for recreation on public land. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(3), 269-280. 41.Samdin, Z., Aziz, Y. A., Radam, A., & Yacob, M. R. (2010). Factors influencing the willingness to pay for entrance permit: The evidence from Taman Negara National Park. Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(3), 212-220. 42.Schneider, I. E., & Budruk, M. (1999). Displacement as a response to the federal recreation fee program. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 11(3), 76-84. 43.Schroeder, H. W., & Louviere, J. (1999). Stated choice models for predicting the impact of user fees at public recreation sites. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(3), 300-324. 44.Schwartz, Z., & Lin, L. C. (2006). The impact of fees on visitation of national parks. Tourism Management, 27, 1386-1396. 45.Shultz, S., Pinazzo, J., & Cifuentes, M. (1998). Opportunities and limitations of contingent valuation surveys to determine national park entrance fees: Evidence from Costa Rica. Environment and Development Economics, 3, 131–149. 46.Thur, S. M. (2010). User fees as sustainable financing mechanisms for marine protected areas: An application to the Bonaire National Marine Park. Marine Policy, 34, 63-69. 47.Togridou, A., Hovardas, T., & Pantis, J. D. (2006). Determinants of visitors’ willingness to pay for the National Marine Park of Zakynthos, Greece. Ecological Economics, 60, 308-319. 48.Uyarra, M. C., Gill, J. A., & Cote, I. M. (2010). Charging for nature: Marine park fees and management from a user perspective. AMBIO, 39, 515-523. 49.White, P. C. L., & Lovett, J. C. (1999). Public preferences and willingness- to-pay for nature conservation in the North York Moor National Park, UK. Journal of Environmental Management, 55(1), 1-13. 50.Winter, P. L., & Palucki, L. J. (1999). Anticipated response to a fee program: The key is trust. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(3), 207-226. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57582 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 遊憩需求受到遊憩者、遊憩區提供的資源以及兩者間聯繫因素影響，並可透過遊憩者個人願意支付價格(WTP)線反應。瞭解遊憩需求是遊憩區經營管理的重要工作，而太魯閣國家公園為臺灣極具有特色的國家公園，擁有許多不同的遊憩資源，本研究目的為調查臺灣遊客對太魯閣國家公園的願付門票費用，並探討影響願付費用的因素。本研究透過文獻回顧歸納影響願付費用的重要因子，並於2014年5月在國家公園範圍內進行現地調查，收集共386份有效問卷。研究結果顯示臺灣遊客對太魯閣國家公園個人單日門票的最高願付費用平均為193元，以願付100元的受訪者最多，占整體20.47%，超過半數(56.22%)受訪者最高願意支付150元。在探討影響願付費用因素部份，本研究將因素歸類為個人特性與經驗、遊憩吸引力、旅遊成本三大面向，迴歸分析結果顯示月收入、教育程度、太魯閣原住民文化獨特性、世界級的峽谷斷崖獨特性、登山健行步道獨特性、符合旅遊需求程度、停留時間顯著正向影響門票願付費用，其中以月收入及世界級峽谷斷崖獨特性的影響力最大。本研究結果可提供遊憩區管理單位經營及後續研究之參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Recreation demand is a result of the interaction among the visitors, the characters of recreation areas and the factors connecting visitors and sites. Recreation demand can be presented by the curve of an individual willingness to pay (WTP). Understanding the demand of recreation sites is important for managers. Taroko National Park, with its diverse resources, is one of the most unique parks in Taiwan. The primary objective of this study was to measure visitors’ WTP for entrance fee in Taroko National Park, and investigate the factors that determine WTP. A total of 386 effective on-site questionnaires were collected in the year 2014 during May. The results indicated that the mean of WTP was 193 NT dollars and the mode was 100 NT dollars, accounting for 20.47% of the respondents. More than half of the respondents were willing to pay 150 NT dollars (56.22%). On the important influencing factors of WTP, our study chose visitors' characters and experience, tourism attraction, and travel cost aspects. We then examined the influence of these factors on visitors’ WTP. Using a multiple regressions analysis, the results suggested that the variables income, level of education, the uniqueness of Taroko aboriginal culture, the uniqueness of gorge and valley, the uniqueness of hiking trails, the satisfaction of recreation service and facilities, the degree of meeting tourists’ demands, and the time spent in Taroko National Park have significant and positive effects on the amount of WTP. Income and the uniqueness of gorge and valley were most important influencing factors. The results of this study can contribute to recreational site management and to future studies. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T06:52:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01628304-1.pdf: 1502624 bytes, checksum: e92c7e46e078418172acf3ab89309d29 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口委審定書 i
誌謝 iii 摘要 v Abstract vii 目錄 ix 表目錄 xi 圖目錄 xiii 第一章 研究緣起 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 遊憩需求相關理論 5 第二節 願付費用之影響因素 13 第三章 研究方法 31 第一節 研究內容 31 第二節 研究地點 33 第三節 變項測量方法 34 第四節 調查計畫 41 第五節 資料處理與分析方法 43 第四章 結果分析 47 第一節 受測者特性分析 47 第二節 願付門票費用分析 57 第三節 各因素對願付門票費用影響分析 61 第四節 研究結果討論 77 第五章 結論與建議 81 第一節 願付門票費用 81 第二節 願付費用影響因素 83 參考文獻 87 附錄 調查問卷 91 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 遊憩需求 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 需求曲線 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 訂價 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 遊憩吸引力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 滿意度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Recreation demand | en |
| dc.subject | Pricing | en |
| dc.subject | Satisfaction | en |
| dc.subject | Tourism attraction | en |
| dc.subject | Demand curve | en |
| dc.title | 太魯閣國家公園願付門票費用之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Willingness to Pay Entrance Fee in Taroko National Park | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 歐聖榮(Sheng-Jung Ou),陳惠美(Hui-Mei Chen),鄭佳昆(Chia-Kuen Cheng),林寶秀(Bau-Show Lin) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 遊憩需求,需求曲線,遊憩吸引力,滿意度,訂價, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Recreation demand,Demand curve,Tourism attraction,Satisfaction,Pricing, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 92 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-07-22 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.47 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。