請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57500
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 任立中(Li-Chung Jen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chun-Chieh Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃群傑 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T06:48:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-29 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-07-29 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-07-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部份
[1] 任立中、林婷鈴、陳靜怡、李吉仁,「高科技產業產品價值創造與行銷價值專屬化之最適資源配置」,中山管理評論,第十四卷第一期,民國95 年,11-42 頁。 [2] 任立中、陳靜怡,「顧客價值遷移路徑分析:馬可夫鏈模型」,台大管理論叢,第十七卷第二期,民國96 年,133-158頁。 [3] 林婷鈴、陳靜怡、任立中,「解析自有品牌策略與績效關係的迷思:層級貝氏迴歸模式之運用」,台大管理論叢,第十八卷第一期,民國96 年,117-149 頁。 [4] 吳兆益,「聯合分析法在果汁消費者知覺與偏好上之應用研究」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民國71年。 [5] 吳長生,「聯合分析法之行銷應用探討」,國立空中大學商學學報,第七期,民國88年,13-31頁。 [6] 林陽助,「聯合分析及其在行銷上的應用」,四海學報,第8期,民國82年,245-259頁。 [7] 黃俊英,「多變量分析」,中國經濟企業研究所,民國89年,167-195頁。 [8] 劉景賢,「聯合分析法在廠商決策之應用─以海外進入模式的選擇為例」,國立臺灣大學碩士論文,民國90年。 [9] 陳振燧,「顧客基礎的品牌權益衡量與建立之研究」,政治大學企管研究所博士論文,民國85年,39-42頁。 [10] 景怡齡,「 汽車外觀設計與消費者認知之研究」,國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班財務金融組碩士論文,民國94年。 英文部份 [1] Aaker, D.A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity, New York: the Free Press [2] Aaker,D. (1996), “Measuring brand equity across products and markets”, California Management Review, 38(3) Spring [3] Aaker, David A. (1992), “The Value of Brand Equity”, Journal of Business Strategy, 13(4), Jul/Aug 1992, pp.27-32 [4] Barwise,Patrick (1993), “Introduction to The Special Issue on Brand Equity”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(1) [5] Barwise, Patrick (1993) “Brand Equity: Snark of Boojum?”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10, pp.93-104 [6] Benson,P.H., “Analysis of Irregualr Two Dimension Distribution of Consumer Buyer Choice”, Journal of Marketing Research, 3, August 1966, pp.278-288 [7] Balckston, M.(1992), “Observations: Building Brand Equity by Managing the Brand’s Relationships”, Journal of Advertising Research, May/June, pp.79-83 [8] Cattin, Phipippe, and Dick R. Wittink, “Commercial Use of Conjouint Analysis: A Survey,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.46(summer 1982), pp.44-53 [9] Chan, Choi S, DeSarbo, Wayne S, “A Conjoint-Based Product Designing Procedure Incorporating Price Competition,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11, Nov 1994, pp.451-459 [10] Crimmins, J. (1992), “Better measurement and management of brand value”, Journal of Advertising research, 32, July/August [11] Farquhar, P. (1989), “Managing brand equity”, Marketing Research, 1, September [12] Green, P., wind, Y. and Srinivasan. V. (1978), “ Conjoint analysis in consumer research issues and outlook”, Journal of Consumer Research, 5, September [13] Green, P., wind, Y. and Srinivasan. V. (1990), “Conjoint analysis in marketing research: a review of new developments”, Journal of Marketing, 54, October [14] Keller, K.L., (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing,57(1), 1-22 [15] Keller, K. (1993), “Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity”, Journal of Marketing, 57, January [16] Louviere, J. and Johnson, R. (1988), “Measuring brand image with conjoint analysis and choice models”, in Leuthesser, L. (Ed.), Defining,Measuring and Managing Brand Equity: A Conference Summary, Report No. 88=104, marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA [17] Park, C.S., and V. Srinivasan, (1994), “A Survey-Based Method for Measuring and Understanding Brand Equity and its Extendibilitiy,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 271-288 [18] Simon, C.J., and M.W. Sullivan (1993), “The Measurement and Determinants of Brand Equity: A Financial Approach,” Marketing Science, 12(4), 28-52 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57500 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 過去雖已有許多針對品牌權益之探討研究,但針對行銷策略之實證研究並不多,以Aaker與Keller為例,雖以消費者基礎透過知覺品質來衡量品牌權益,但得到之品牌權益在行銷策略之研擬上,卻並沒有太大幫助,而世界各大機構如Interbrand、BDDO等,其所估算之品牌價值多以財務面估算,缺乏行銷面向也無幫助擬定行銷策略之價值,兼且有專家意見過多之問題,對於多數企業來說,並非理想的評價模式因此。本研究以層級貝氏聯合分析方式進行品牌權益之計算,並配合理想點及知覺品質之調查結果進行解釋,以利廠商釐清本身與競爭對手之差異及改進方向。
聯合分析法是一種衡量產品屬性間的抵換關係之方法,透過將品牌與價格納入考量屬性中,可以透過聯合分析之回歸結果,得到品牌間轉換之知覺價值差異,而透過層級貝氏模型之兩階段後驗修正,可以得到更準確的不同市場區隔下,區隔內之整群消費者的偏好結構,進而進行更具有針對性的行銷策略。 基於以上,本研究擬以層級貝氏聯合分析模式,針對汽車市場的消費者為研究對象,達成以下研究目的: 1. 利用聯合分析法結合品牌聯想等面向,發展出容易執行、具有行銷策略意義的品牌鑑價模式; 2. 以台灣汽車產業為例,進行實證分析,並以該結果進行品牌行銷之建議與規劃。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Since 1980s, plenty of research about brand equity had been pronounced, but rare of them is focus on marketing strategy. Take Aaker and Keller as an example, even though they measure consumer-based brand equity through perceived quality, but the results are not really helpful for developing marketing strategies. Some agency like Interbrand and BDDO, most of their measuring are based on finance dimensions, not only lacking of marketing dimensions but also with too many expert advice. Hence this research measuring brand equity by hierarchical bayes conjoint analysis and combining with ideal-point and perceived quality to explain the result for giving interprise assistance to clarify the differential point with competitor and improvement.
Conjoint analysis is a method to measuring the trade off relationship between product attributes. By considering brand and price as attributes, we can figure out the difference of perceived quality between brands. Besides, by using hierarchical bayes model to excut two stage posterier revise, more accurate preference structure under difference market segmentation. Through this preference structure, more targeted marketing strategies can be developed. Based on the above, this research intended to focus on automobiles industry and use hierarchical bayes conjoint analysis to achieve these purpose: 1. Using conjoint analysis with other dimensions to develop a brand equity measuring method which is easy to excute and meaningful in marketing; 2. Using Automobiles Industry as an Example for empirical analysis, and provide suggestion and planning for brand marketing through the result. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T06:48:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01724039-1.pdf: 2218193 bytes, checksum: a985782d123540aaa6a1d32c0bd4b846 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 II
Abstract III 目錄 IV 表目錄 V 圖目錄 VII 第一章 緒論 8 第一節 研究背景與動機 8 第二節 研究目的 9 第三節 品牌權益 9 第四節 研究架構 10 第二章 文獻探討 11 第一節 品牌權益定義 11 第二節 品牌權益的衡量 16 第三節 市場區隔 19 第四節 聯合分析 22 第三章 研究方法 27 第一節 建立產品屬性與水準 27 第二節 正式問卷設計 30 第三節 資料蒐集 34 第四節 資料分析 34 第四章 實證結果 40 第一節 樣本資料描述 40 第二節 品牌權益係數與使用動機分析 60 第五章 結論與後續研究建議 93 第一節 研究結論 93 第二節 小結與行銷策略建議 96 第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 97 附錄1 汽車消費者偏好前側問卷 98 附錄2 汽車消費者偏好問卷 100 參考文獻 111 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以層級貝氏聯合分析模型探討汽車產業品牌權益 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Measuring Brand Equity by Hierarchical Bayes Conjoint Analysis: Using Automobiles Industry as an Example | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳靜怡,劉秀雯 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 品牌權益,聯合分析,層級貝氏,市場區隔,汽車產業, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Brand Equity,Conjoint Analysis,Hierarchical Bayes,Market Segmentation,Automobiles Industry, | en |
dc.relation.page | 113 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-07-24 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.17 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。