請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57047
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡坤憲(Kun-Hsien Tsai) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chia-Hung Tsai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蔡佳宏 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T06:33:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-10-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-04 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Adarm MD, Celniker SE, Holt RA et al. 2000. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 287: 2185-2195.
Ali A, Nayar JK, Knight JW et al. 1989. Attraction of Florida mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) to artificial light in the flield. California: 57th Annu Conf Calif Mos Vect Contr Assoc. 82-88. Allan SA, Day JF and Edman JD. 1987. Visual ecology of biting flies. Ann Rev Entomol. 32: 297-316. Barr AR, Smith TA, Boreham MM et al. 1963. Evaluation of some factors affecting the efficiency of light traps for collecting mosquitoes. J Econ Entomol. 56: 123-127. Bentley MT, Kaufman PE, Kline DL et al. 2009. Response of adult mosquitoes to light-emitting diodes placed in resting boxes and in the field. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 25: 285-291. Bowen MF. 1991. The sensory physiology of host-seeking behavior in mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol. 36: 139-158. Brammer JD. 1970. The ultrastructure of the compound eye of a mosquito Aedes aegypti L. J Exp Zool. 175: 181-196. Brammer JD and Clarin B. 1976. Changes in volume of the rhabdom in the compound eye of Aedes aegypti. J Exp Zool. 195: 33-40. Brian PE, Clark JW, Barbara KA et al. 2009. Operational vector-borne disease surveillance and control: closing the capabilities gap through research at overseas military laboratories. Army Med Dep J. 2: 18-27. Briscoe AD and Chittka L. 2001. The evolution of color vision in insect. Annu Rev Entomol. 46: 471-510. Breyev KA. 1963. The effect of various light sources on the numbers and species of blood-sucking mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) collected in light traps. Entomol Rev. 42: 155-168. Brown AW. 1966. The attraction of mosquitoes to hosts. J.A.M.A. 196: 249-252. Burkett DA, Butler JF and Kline DL. 1998. Field evaluation of colored light-emitting diodes as attractants for woodland mosquitoes and other diptera in north central Florida. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 14: 186-195. Burkett DA and Butler JF. 2005. Laboratory evaluation of colored light as an attractant for female Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, Anopheles quadrimaculatus, and Culex nigripalpus. Fla Entomol. 88: 383-389. Chambers EW, Bossin HC, Ritchie SA et al. 2013. Landing response of Aedes (Stegomyia) polynesiensis mosquitoes to coloured targets. Med Vet Entomol. 27: 332-338. Clements AN. 1999. The biology of mosquitoes. Volume 2 Sensory reception and behavior. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 756pp. Davis EE and Sokolove PG. 1975. Temperature response of antennal receptors of the mosquito, Aedes aegypti. J Comp Physiol. 96: 223-236. Delatte H, Desvars A, Bouetard A et al. 2010. Blood-feeding behavior of Aedes albopictus, a vector of chikungunya on La Re´union. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 10: 249-258. Farrar J, Focks D, Gubler D, et al. 2007. Editorial: Towards a global dengue research agenda. Trop Med Intl Health. 12: 695-699. Fowler MA and Montell C. 2013. Drosophila TRP channels and animal behavior. Life Sciences. 92: 394-403. Gillies MT. 1980. The role of carbon dioxide in host-finding by mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): a review. Bull Entomol Res. 70: 525-532. Gilbert IH and Gouck HK. 1957. Influence of surface color on mosquito landing rates. J Econ Entomol. 50: 678-680. Gingl E, Hinterwirth A and Tichy H. 2005. Sensory representation of temperature in mosquito warm and cold cells. J Neurophysiol. 94: 176-185. Gubler DJ. 2002. Epidemic dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever as a public health, social and economic problem in the 21st century. Trends Microbiol. 10: 100-103. Ismail IA. 1962. Sense organs in the antennae of Anopheles maculipennis atroparvus (V. Thiel) and their possible function in relation to the attraction of female mosquito to man. Acta Trop. 19: 1-58. Holt RA, Subramanian GM, Halpern A et al. 2002. The genome sequence of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Science. 298: 129-149. Kamgang B, Nchoutpouen E and Simard F. 2012. Notes on the blood-feeding behavior of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Cameroon. Parasites Vectors. 5: 57-60. Kawada H, Takemura SY, Arikawa K et al. 2005. Comparative study on nocturnal behavior of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. J Med Entomol. 42: 312-318. Kline DL, Takken W, Wood JR et al. 1990. Field studies on the potential of butanone, carbon dioxide, honey extract, 1-octen-3-ol, L-Lactic acid and phenols as attractant for mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol. 4: 383-391. Lu T, Qiu YT, Wang G et al. 2007. Odor coding in the maxillary palp of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Curr Biol. 17: 1533-1544. Marchand W. 1918. First account of a thermotropism in Anopheles punctipennis, with bionomic observations. Psyche. 25: 130-135. Maekawa E, Aonuma H, Nelson B, et al. 2011. The role of proboscis of the malaria vector mosquito Anopleles stepensi in host-seeking behavior. Parasites Vectors. 4: 10-22. Mayer MS and James JD. 1969. Attraction of Aedes aegypti (L): Responses to human arms, carbon dioxide, and air currents in a new type of olfactometer. Bull Ent Res. 58: 629-642. Montell C. 2005. Drosophila TRP channels. Eur J Physiol. 451: 19-28. Muir LE, Thorne MJ and Kay BH. 1992. Aedes aegypti (Diptera: culicidae) vision: spectral sensitivity and other perceptual parameters of the female eye. J Med Entomol. 29: 278-281. Nene V, Wortman JR, Lawson D et al. 2007. Genome sequence of Aedes aegypti, a major arbovirus vector. Science. 316: 1718-1723. Nilsson DE. 1990. From cornea to retinal image in invertebrate eyes. Trends Neurosci. 13: 55-64. Obenauer PJ, Abdel MS, Stoop CA et al. 2013. Field responses Anopheles gambiae complex (Diptera Culicidae) in Liberia using yeast-generated carbon dioxide and synthetic lure-baited light traps. J Med Entomol. 50: 863-870. Smith K, Thompson G and Koster HD. 1969. Sweat in schizophrenic patients: identification of the odorous substance. Science. 166: 398-399. Stark JD and Vargas RI. 1992. Differential response of male oriental fruit-fly (Diptera, Tephritidae) to colored traps baited with methyleugenol. J Econ Entomol. 85: 808-812. Stein PJ, Brammer JF and Ostroy SE. 1979. Renewal of opsin in the photoreceptor cells of the mosquito. J Gen Physiol. 74: 565-582. Stone CM, Tuten HC and Dobson SL. 2013. Determinants of male Aedes aegypti and Aedes polynesiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) response to sound: efficacy and considerations for use of sound traps in the field. J Med Entomol. 50: 723-730. Takken W and Knol BG. 1999. Odor-mediated behavior of Afrotropical malaria mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol. 44: 131-157. Tchouassi DP, Sang R, Sole GL et al. 2012. Trapping of Rift Valley Fever (RVF) vectors using Light Emitting Diode (LED) CDC traps in two arboviral disease hot spots in Kenya. Parasites Vectors. 5: 94-100. Tuan YC, Wang YZ, Huang CC et al. 2011. An analysis of the implementation of the Source Reduction Program in response to 2010 dengue epidemic. Epidemiol Bull. 27: 164-76. Vargas RI, Stark JD, Prokopy RJ et al. 1991. Response of oriental fruit-fly (Diptera, Tephritidae) and associated parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) to different-color spheres. J Econ Entomol. 84: 1503-1507. Wang CH, Chang NT, Wu HH, et al. 2000. Integrated control of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in Liu- Chiu Village, Ping-Tung County, Taiwan. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 16: 93-99. Wang G, Yu TQ, Lu T, et al. 2009. Anopheles gambiae TRPA1 is a heat-activated channel expressed in thermosensitive sensilla of female antennae. Eur J Neurosci. 30: 967-974. Wu YC. 1986. Epidemic dengue 2 on Liouchyou Shian, Pingtune County in 1981. Chin J Microbiol Immunol. 19: 203-211. Yasuno M and Tonn RJ.1970. A study of biting habits of Aedes aegypti in Bangkok, Thailand. Bull World Health Organ. 43: 319-325. 徐筱瑜、賴淑寬、郭俊賢等人。2013。2003-2011年臺灣登革出血熱個案流行病學分析。疫情報導。29: 319-328。 牛興華、呂炳榮、胡新實等人。2001。臺灣正常人體表溫度對稱性正常值之研究。中華醫學雜誌。64: 459-486。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/57047 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 登革熱是臺灣最嚴重的蟲媒傳染病,目前仍無登革熱疫苗或治療性藥物,以病媒蚊防治作為主要防治手段。本研究致力於發展新型捕蚊工具,針對可吸引埃及斑蚊 (Aedes aegypti) 及白線斑蚊 (Ae. albopictus) 可能的物理性誘集因子,包含燈光、顏色及溫度,於實驗室進行評估測試,爾後探討蚊子熱感應基因之表現差異。實驗結果顯示,紫外光 (360 nm) 比藍光 (450 nm)、綠光 (510 nm)、紅光 (630 nm) 有更好的誘捕效果,埃及斑蚊 (n=50) 雌蟲誘捕率42.00±7.94%,雄蟲10.00±6.24%,白線斑蚊 (n=50) 雌蟲誘捕率46.33±3.78%,雄蟲15.67±4.04%。不同顏色色紙吸引埃及斑蚊雌蟲 (n=25) 的效果依序如下: 黑色 (24.53±2.02%) > 深藍色 (21.87±1.52%) > 紅色 (14.13±1.19%) > 綠色 (6.67±2.11%) > 淺藍色 (4.53±1.79%) > 黃色 (1.33±0.00%);白線斑蚊雌蟲 (n=25) 則是: 紅色 (25.6±2.89%) > 黑色 (23.73±1.16%) > 深藍色 (20.53±0.73%) > 淺藍色 (6.4±1.16%) > 綠色 (5.6±1.11%) > 黃色 (2.4±2.89%)。結合黑色外殼的紫外光捕蚊燈誘捕效果高於單一誘引因子,埃及斑蚊雌蟲 (n=50) 誘捕率62.42±8.03%,白線斑蚊雌蟲 (n=50) 則是76.05±10.34%。容易吸引埃及斑蚊及白線斑蚊雌蟲的溫度範圍介於26-38°C,埃及斑蚊雌蟲 (n=25) 誘引率45.14±3.02%,白線斑蚊雌蟲 (n=25) 誘引率40.57±6.70%。色紙包覆的加熱板 (32°C) 誘引埃及斑蚊雌蟲(n=25) 效果如下:黑色 (70.67±4.62%) >深藍色 (65.33±8.33%) > 紅色 (50.67±9.24%) > 未包覆色紙 (45.33±10.07%) > 白色 (38.67±8.33%),白線斑蚊 (n=25) 則是:黑色 (70.67±8.32%) > 深藍色 (72.00±6.92%) > 紅色(65.33±8.32%) > 未包覆色紙 (48.00±6.92%) > 白色 (41.22±6.11%)。在果蠅的研究中,TRPA會受環境溫度所調控,而在瘧蚊觸角上更發現TRPA1是熱感受性極高的通道蛋白,因此,我們除了探討熱因子的誘引效果,也想了解埃及斑蚊及白線斑蚊受到熱刺激後,身上是否也有類似的蛋白質表現。實驗中分離有受到熱誘引及沒有受到熱誘引的蚊子頭部萃取總RNA,以TRPA1基因片段進行定量分析,實驗結果顯示有受到熱刺激的蚊子,頭部TRPA1 基因的RNA表現含量是沒有被熱吸引的蚊子的1.48倍,白線斑蚊則是1.59倍。根據以上的實驗結果,我們得到特定的光波長、顏色及溫度對埃及斑蚊及白線斑蚊都具有相當程度的誘引性,以及發現其身上的TRPA1基因會受熱刺激而活化。未來,我們希望可以利用這些實驗成果,實際應用於登革熱病媒蚊防治工作,例如新型捕蚊工具開發,期待對於日行性的蚊蟲有更好的防治效果。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Dengue fever is one of the most serious insect-borne infectious diseases in Taiwan. It has no vaccine or medicine for dengue now, so it should be relying on vector control. This study is aimed to develop physical strategies for trapping Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus by potential attractable factors, including light, color and temperature, as well as to analyze the performance of heat-activated channel gene expression. The results obtained from our laboratory experiment showed that ultraviolet light (360 nm) was more effective to attract diurnal Ae. mosquitoes than blue (450 nm), green (510 nm) and red (630 nm) light be. The attraction rate of female Ae. aegypti (n=50) and male (n=50) were 42.00±7.94% and 10.00±6.24%, and female Ae. albopictus (n=50) and male (n=50) were 46.33±3.78% and 15.67±4.04%. The preferences of female Ae. aegypti (n=25) to colors was shown in the following: black (24.53±2.02%) > deep blue (21.87±1.52%) > red (14.13±1.19%) > green (6.67±2.11%) > light blue (4.53±1.79%) > yellow (1.33±0.00%). Similarly, female Ae. albopictus to colors was: red (25.6±2.89%) > black (23.73±1.16%) > deep blue (20.53±0.73%) > light blue (6.4±1.16%) > green (5.6±1.11%) > yellow (2.4±2.89%). The combination of black color and ultraviolet for light trap led to higher attraction rate (62.42±8.03%) toward Ae.aegypti, and rate (76.05±10.34%) toward Ae. albopictus. Temperatures ranging from 26 ° C to 38 ° C could attract both Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. The attraction rates of female Ae. aegypti (n=25) and Ae. albopictus (n=25) were 45.14±3.02% and 40.57±6.70%, respectively. The condition of color paper covered on heater at 32 °C brought higher attraction rate: black (70.67±4.62%) > deep blue (65.33±8.33%) > red (50.67±9.24%) > uncovered (45.33±10.07%) > white (38.67±8.33%). Similarly, female Ae. albopictus was:black (70.67±8.32%) > deep blue (72.00±6.92%) > red (65.33±8.32%) > uncovered (48.00±6.92%) > white (41.22±6.11%). In the studies on Drosophila, TRPA was affected by ambient temperature. In other studies, it was found that TRPA1 on Anopheles gambiae antennae acted as a kind of channels which would be excited by heat. Therefore, not only do we want to figure out attraction effect of heat on mosquitoes, but to understand levels of heat-induced gene expression in Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. So this study separated the heads from mosquitoes, which were subsequently sorted into heat-attractable and non-attractable group. Then the total RNA was extracted from the heads followed by TRPA1 gene amplification using RT-PCR. The results showed that the level of TRPA1 expression in Ae. aegypti heads of attractable group were 1.48 times higher than non-attractable group, and those in heads of Ae. albopictus was 1.59 times as much as non-attractable group. Based on the these results, we got a specific wavelength, color and temperature that are able to efficiently attract Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. And TRPA1 gene was found to be activated with heat excitement in Ae. aegypti. In the future work, based on our findings, we hope to develop a novel mosquito trap with more effective capacity for diurnal mosquitoes control, which could be expected to be applied in practical control of mosquitoes and prevention of dengue fever. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T06:33:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01844010-1.pdf: 1871012 bytes, checksum: 46ce4cb69a090db8f9d5c62d8eafd871 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
論文口試審定書 i 致謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 v 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 登革熱流行病學及病媒蚊 1 1.2 現行登革熱防治方法與成效 3 1.3 前人研究 6 1.3.1 蚊蟲的感覺器官 6 1.3.2 蚊蟲視覺感受性 7 1.3.3 蚊蟲熱趨性 8 1.3.4 熱感基因TRPA 9 第二章 材料與方法 11 2.1 蚊蟲飼養 11 2.2 視覺因子誘集分析 12 2.2.1 斑蚊對不同波長燈光偏好性之比較 12 2.2.2 斑蚊對物體顏色偏好性之比較 12 2.2.3燈光與顏色協同作用分析 13 2.2.4 市售昆蟲物理誘黏劑防治斑蚊可行性評估 13 2.3 熱因子誘集分析 15 2.3.1可行之誘引溫度分析 15 2.3.2誘引時段之比較 15 2.3.3埃及斑蚊日齡與誘引率之比較 15 2.3.4埃及斑蚊交配情形與誘引率之比較 16 2.3.5熱源與顏色協同作用分析 16 2.3.6埃及斑蚊之唾液蛋白分析 17 2.4 埃及斑蚊TRPA1基因之表現差異 18 2.4.1 引子設計 18 2.4.2 RNA萃取 18 2.4.3 反轉錄聚合酶連鎖反應 (Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction, RT-PCR) 19 2.4.4即時定量反轉錄聚合酶連鎖反應 (real time RT-PCR) 20 2.5 統計分析 22 第三章 結果 23 3.1 視覺因子誘集分析 23 3.1.1 斑蚊對不同波長燈光偏好性之比較 23 3.1.2 斑蚊對物體顏色偏好性之比較 24 3.1.3燈光與顏色協同作用分析 25 3.1.4 市售昆蟲物理誘黏劑防治斑蚊可行性評估 26 3.2 熱因子誘集分析 27 3.2.1誘引溫度分析 27 3.2.2誘引時段之比較 27 3.2.3埃及斑蚊日齡與誘引率之比較 28 3.2.4埃及斑蚊交配情形與誘引率之比較 28 3.2.5熱源與顏色協同作用分析 28 3.3 埃及斑蚊TRPA1基因之表現差異 29 第四章 討論 30 4.1 視覺因子誘集分析 30 4.1.1 斑蚊對不同波長燈光偏好性之比較 30 4.1.2 斑蚊對物體顏色偏好性之比較 31 4.2 熱因子誘集分析 32 4.3 埃及斑蚊TRPA1基因之表現差異 33 參考文獻 34 圖目錄 40 表目錄 41 附錄 42 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 燈光、顏色及溫度對登革熱病媒蚊之誘集能力及其熱感應基因TRPA1之表現 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Attractable ability of light, color and temperature in dengue vector mosquitoes and their gene expressions of heat-activated channel TRPA1 | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃榮南,王正雄,施惟量 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 登革熱,病媒蚊防治,波長,顏色,溫度,TRPA1, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | dengue,vector control,wavelength,color,temperature,TRPA1, | en |
dc.relation.page | 69 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-04 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境衛生研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境衛生研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.83 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。