請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56982
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 魏家豪(De Reu Wim) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chun-Man Kwong | en |
dc.contributor.author | 鄺雋文 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T06:32:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-08 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | BIBLIOGRAPHY
I. Chinese Sources i. Commentaries of Zhuangzi 郭慶藩,《莊子集釋》,台北:萬卷樓,1993。 陳鼓應,《莊子今註今譯》,台北:台灣商務,1999。 王叔岷,《莊子校詮》,北京:中華書局,2007。 ii. Books 裴學海,《古書虛詞集釋》,台北:商務印書局,1932。 勞思光,《新編中國哲學史》,臺灣:三民,1981。 劉笑敢,《莊子哲學及其演變》,北京:中國社會科學出版社,1987。 方東美,《原始儒家道家哲學》,臺灣:黎明文化,2005。 梁漱溟,《中國文化要義》,上海:上海人民出版社,2005。 林明照,《先秦道家的禮樂觀》,臺灣:五南圖書出版公司,2007。 iii. Journal Articles 陳靜 ,〈“吾喪我” - 《莊子齊物論》解讀〉,《哲學研究》2001:5,頁49-53 楊國榮,〈莊子哲學中的個體與自我〉,《哲學研究》, 2005:12, 頁40-46. II. English Sources i. Translation and Commentaries on Zhuangzi Graham, A.C. (2001). Chuang-Tzu: The Inner Chapter, London :Hackett Publishing Co. Watson, Burton (1996). The Complete Works of Chuang-Tzu, N.Y:Columbia University Press. ii. Books Allison, Robert E. (1989). Chuang-Tzu for Spiritual Transformation: An Analysis of the Inner Chapters, Albany: SUNY Press. Chung-ying Cheng. (1991). New Dimensions of Confucianism and Neo-Confucian Philosophy Albany: SUNY Press. De Bary, Wm. T. (1991). Learning for One’s Self: Essays on the Individual in Neo-Confucian Thought. New York: Columbia University Press Kuang-ming, Wu (1990). Butterfly as Companion: Meditation on the First Three Chapters of the Chuan Tzu Albany: SUNY Press. Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). Creating the Kingdom of Ends, N.Y: Cambridge University Press ────── (1996). The Sources of Normativity, N.Y: Cambridge University Press Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books. Nivison, David and Bryan W. Yan Norden (1996). The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy, La Salle, III: Open Court. Slingerland, Edward (2003). Effortless action: Wu-wei as conceptual metaphor and spiritual ideal in early China, New York: Oxford University Press. iii. Articles Berlin, Judith (1985). “Self and Whole in Chuang Tzu” in Individualism and Holism: studies in Confucian Value and Taoist values. ed. D.Munro, Ann Arbor : Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan Cheng, Kai-Yuan (Forthcoming). “Self and Personal Identity in the Zhuangzi” De Reu, Wim. (2006) “Right Words Seem Wrong: Neglected Paradoxes in Early Chinese Philosophical Texts.” Philosophy East and West 56:2, pp. 281-300 De Prycker, Valerie (2011). “Unself-Conscious control: Broadening the Notion of Control through Experience of Flow and Wu-Wei”, Zygon 46:1, pp.5-25 Fraser, Chris (2007). “On Wu-Wei as a Unifying Metaphor” Review of Effortless Action, by Slingerland, Edward. Philosophy East & West 57:1, pp.97-106 Goldin, Paul Rakita (2003). “A Mind- Body Problem in the Zhuangzi” in Hiding the World in the World: Uneven Discourses in Zhuangzi, Scott Cook (ed.), Albany: SUNY Press. Graham, A.C. (1986). “How much of Chuang-tzǔ did Chuang-tzǔ write?” In Studies in Chinese philosophy and philosophical literature, A.C. Graham (ed.), Singapore: National University of Singapore. 283-321. (Originally published in Journal of the American Academy of Religions 1979, 47:3) Hall, D.L. (1994). “Be or Not to Be: The Postmodern Self and the Wu-Forms of Taoism” in Self as Person in Asian Theory and Practice, Ames, Roger T. (ed.), Albany:SUNY Press., pp.213-234. Hansen, Chad (1983). “Mass Noun Hypothesis and Abstraction in Chinese Language and Thought” in Language and Logic in Ancient China, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press ──────(1983). “A Dao of Dao in Chuang Tzu”, in Experimental Essays on Chuang Tzu, V.H. Mair (ed.), Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. Huang, Yong (2010). “The Ethics of Difference in the Zhuangzi” Journal of the American academy of Religion 78:1 pp.65-99 Ivanhoe, Philip (2007). “The Paradox of Wu-Wei?” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34:2, pp. 277-87. Jochim, Chris. (1998). “Just Say No to ‘No-Self’ in Zhuangzi” in Wandering at Ease in the Zhuangzi ed. Roger T. Ames. Albany: SUNY Press. Johnson, Mark (2008). “Philosophy Debt to Metaphor” in Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.39-52. Munro, Donald J. (1985). in ‘’ Individualism and Holism: studies in Confucian Value and Taoist values. Ann Arbor : Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan. Roth, Harold D. (2000). “Bimodal Mystical Experience in the “Qiwulun” Chapter of Zhuangzi.” Journal of Chinese Religions 28:1, pp. 31-50 Slingerland, Edward (2004). “Conceptions of the Self in the Zhuangzi: Conceptual Metaphor Analysis and Comparative Thought” Philosophy East and West 54:3, pp.322-342. ────────(2010) “Toward an Empirically-responsible Ethics: Cognitive Science, Virtue Ethics, and Effortless Attention in Early Chinese Thought”, in Effortless Attention: A New Perspective in the Cognitive Science of Attention and Action, Brian Bruya (ed.) MA: MIT Press, pp.247-286. ────────(2011). “Metaphor and Meaning in Early China” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10:1, pp.1-30 Sterckx, Roel (2005). “Animal Classification in Ancient China”, EASTM, 23, pp.26-53 Xu Keqian (2011). “A Different Type of Individualism in Zhuangzi” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10:4, pp. 445-462. Yang, Rur-bin (2003). “From ‘Merging the Body with the Mind’ to ‘Wandering in Unitary Qi 氣’: A Discussion of Zhuangzi’s Realm of the True Man and Its Corporeal Basis” Hiding the World in the World Albany:SUNY Press. pp.88-127 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56982 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 莊子對自我的態度似乎是矛盾的:莊子一方面認為我們應該放棄自我而融於萬物之中,例如〈逍遙遊〉裡的「至人無己」;另一方面他又認為我們應該在世界之中保存自我,例如〈逍遙遊〉裡的「定乎內外之分」。這使我們難以斷定莊子哲學中的理想人格究竟是一個無我的人,抑或是一個可以保存自我的人。在本文中,我企圖透過論證莊子真正主張的是我們應該放棄「自我意識」而非「自我」或「假我」,以解決這兩個主張之間的張力。按照這個詮釋,將出現一個我稱之為「無我的自我修養」的悖論,因為自我修養概念上既要求自我意識,自我修養自不能幫助我們去除自我意識。本文故亦企圖指出莊子哲學中的動物隱喻與技藝訓練乃解決此悖論最為重要的想法。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Zhuangzi seems to hold contradicting attitudes toward “self” : on one hand, he tells us that we should lose ourselves and merge into the myriad things - “the utmost man is selfless至人無己” in Xiaoyaoyou逍遙遊for example; on the other, he also advocates that we should protect ourselves from the world - “holding on the distinction between internal and external定乎內外之分” in Xiaoyaoyou for example. It seems puzzling whether the ideal person in Zhuangzi’s philosophy is one who loses himself, or one who preserves himself. In this thesis I attempt to solve the tension between these two notions by arguing that what Zhuangzi really advocates is that we should cast off our “self-consciousness” rather than “self” or “fake-self”. This interpretation leads to what I call the “paradox of the self-cultivation of ‘No-Self’” since self-cultivation conceptually requires self-cultivation and thereby cannot help us cast off our self-consciousness. This thesis hence also attempts to show that the metaphor of animal and “knack-training” are of great importance for the solution of the paradox. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T06:32:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01124002-1.pdf: 1223067 bytes, checksum: 6063ee87e0a4097c500b34d55f1bbbce (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | ACKNOWLEDGEMENT i
ABSTRACT ii INTRODUCTION 1 PART I: THE TEXTUAL TENSION 9 CHAPTER ONE: Demonstrating the Textual Tension 9 1.1 Just Say No to No-Self in Zhuangzi? 9 1.2 The trace of the “No-self” Doctrine in Zhuangzi 12 1.3 The trace of the “Protecting the Self” Doctrine in Zhuangzi 15 CHAPTER TWO: True-Self VS Fake-Self 18 2.1 The “True-Self VS Fake-Self” Theory and Its Plausibility 18 2.2 Objections to the “True-Self VS Fake-Self” Theory 24 CHAPTER THREE: Solving the Textual Tension though the “Protecting the Self through Casting off Self-Consciousness” Interpretation 34 3.1 Re-Explaining Zhuangzi’s “No-Self” Doctrine: Endorsement of Losing Self-consciousness in Qiwulun 35 3.2 Re-Explaining Zhuangzi’s “No-Self” Doctrine: Wu Ji, Wang Ji, and the Notion of “Merging into the Myriad Things” 46 3.3 Two Possible Problems and Responses 52 PART II: THE THEORETICAL TENSION: the “Paradox of the Self-Cultivation of ‘No-Self’” 59 CHAPTER FOUR: The “Paradox of the Self-Cultivation of ‘No-Self’”, the “Paradox of Virtue” and the “Paradox of Wu-Wei” 60 CHAPTER FIVE: Slingerland’s Understanding of Zhuangzi’s Conception of Self-Cultivation 66 CHAPTER SIX: the Metaphor of Animal and Knack-Training as the Solution 78 6.1 The Metaphor of Animal in Zhuangzi 78 6.2 “Knack-Training” 104 CONCLUSION &FURTHER DEVELOPMENT 123 BIBLIOGRAPHY 128 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 《莊子》中的「保己」與「無己」的張力: 「無我的自我修養」悖論 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Tension between “Protecting the Self” and “No-Self” in Zhuangzi: The “Paradox of the Self-Cultivation of ‘No-Self’” | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林明照(Ming-Chao Lin),鄭凱元(Kai-Yuan Cheng) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 莊子,真我,無我,自我意識,「無我的自我修養」悖論, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Zhuangzi,True-self,No-self,Self-consciousness,the “paradox of the self-cultivation of ‘No-Self’”, | en |
dc.relation.page | 132 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 哲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。