請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56853完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 邱祈榮 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yuan-Hui Chuang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 莊媛卉 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T06:30:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-09-05 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-09-05 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-07 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 工業技術研究院（2012）國產木材產地證明、驗證制度之研究。林務局研究報告。
中國森林認證管理委員會（2012a）《中國森林認證 非木質林產品》編制說明。2013年10月3日檢自http://www.cfcs.org.cn/zh/index.action 中國森林認證管理委員會（2012b）中國森林認證 森林經營。2014年4月17日檢自http://www.cfcs.org.cn/zh/index.action 中國森林認證管理委員會（2013a）《中國森林認證 非木質林產品》徵求意見稿。2013年10月3日檢自http://www.cfcs.org.cn/zh/index.action 中國森林認證管理委員會（2013b）中國森林認證 非木質林產品經營（報批搞）。2013年4月11日檢自http://www.cfcs.org.cn/zh/index.action 行政院農業委員會林務局（2014a）林產品生產量值─按區域分。2014年7月5日檢自http://www.forest.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1 行政院農業委員會林務局（2014b）森林副產物生產價值─按機關分。2014年7月5日檢自http://www.forest.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1 吳輝虎（2008）愛玉子平地栽培生產技術。苗栗區農業專訊43:2-5。 李俊彥（2010）台灣森林認證成功的推手－政府扮演的角色。林業研究專訊17(5):46-49。 李俊彥、黃金城、李建賢（2007）發展與國際接軌的台灣森林認證標準。台灣林業33(1):106-110。 李炳叡、李俊彥、黃金城（2005）台灣導入國際森林認證的探討。台灣林業31(2):42-51。 李桃生（2013）原住民族林業發展之探討。台灣林業39(6):3-13。 林孟均、盧美君（2012）台灣新興作物─愛玉子。苗栗區農業專訊59:8-10。 林俊成、林裕仁、邱祈榮、王怡穩（2013）全球森林認證現況與未來發展。林業研究專訊20(1)7-12。 林裕仁（2012）認識中國大陸CFCC森林認驗證系統。林業研究專訊19(1):74-79。 林曉洪（2007）森林特產物的開發潛力。豐年57(5):54-58。 林樺（2012）小何賽被授予FSC森林管理認證。中國食品2012(7):40。檢自http://cnki50.csis.com.tw/kns50/Navi/item.aspx?NaviID=1&BaseID=SPZH&NaviLink=%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E9%A3%9F%E5%93%81 邱祈榮、林俊成、林裕仁、莊媛卉（2013a）FSC第四版與第五版森林管理驗證原則與準則之比較。中華林學季刊46(3):327-342。 邱祈榮、莊媛卉、林俊成（2013b）森林驗證與木材合法性。林業研究專訊20(1)13-21。 夏恩龍（2009）中國竹林經營認證標準及其影響因素研究。中國林業科學研究院博士論文。 章軻（2014）中國森林認證體系CFCC與PEFC實現互認。2014年3月13日檢自http://www.cfcs.org.cn/zh/index.action 陸軍（2008）推進非木質林產品認證保障可食林產品質量安全。中國林業產業2008(12):28-31。 曾燕如，潘繼進，喻衛武（2004）國際森林認證與我國森林食品的生產。浙江林學院學報21(4):480-485。 馮彩雲（2001）世界非用材林產品現狀、存在問題及其應對政策。林業科技管理2:56-59。 楊政川、李世傑、何坤益、林敏宜（2010）台灣森林特產物—土肉桂。科學發展446:28-33。 楊駿憲、李建霖、林耿民（2013）國有林林產物處分規則第十四條、第十五條修正簡介。台灣林業39(6):97-98。 Belcher, B., M. Ruiz-Pérez, and R. Achdiawan (2005) Global Patterns and Trends in the Use and Management of Commercial NTFPs: Implications for Livelihoods and Conservation. World Development 33(9):1435-1452. Brown, L., D. Robinson, and M. Karmann (2002) The Forest Stewardship Council and Non-Timber Forest Product Certification: A discussion paper. Retrieved on October 4, 2013, from http://www.giz.de/Themen/de/dokumente/en-d59-fsc-and-non-timber-forest-product-certification-discu.pdf Cocks, M. L., and K. F. Wiersum (2003) The significance of plant diversity to rural households in Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 13(1):39-58. FAO (2010) Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 – key findings. Retrieved on January 23, 2014, from http://www.fao.org/forestry/en/ Fisher C., F. Aguilar, P. Jawahar, and R. Sedjo (2005) Forest Certification: Toward Common Standards? Discussion Paper 05-10. Washington, DC.; Resources for the Future. FLO (2011). FAIRTRADE STANDARD FOR Timber FOR Forest Enterprises sourcing from small-scale/community-based producers. Retrieved on June 17, 2014, from http://www.fairtrade.net/ FSC (2011) FSC Standard for Chain of Custody Certification FSC-STD-40-004 V2-1 EN. Retrieved on October 14, 2013, from http://ic.fsc.org/ FSC (2012) FSC International Standard - FSC Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship FSC-STD-01-001 (V5-0) EN. Retrieved on September 26, 2012, from http://ic.fsc.org/ FSC (2013) Global FSC certificates: type and distribution February 2013. Retrieved on September 10, 2013, from http://ic.fsc.org/ FSC (2014a) FSC International Standard - FSC International Generic Indicators FSC-STD-01-004 V1-0 EN DRAFT 2-0 FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION. Retrieved on May 1, 2014, from http://igi.fsc.org/index.htm FSC (2014b) Global FSC certificates: type and distribution February 2014. Retrieved on July 5, 2014, from http://ic.fsc.org/ FSC (2014c) Global FSC certificates: type and distribution June 2014. Retrieved on July 14, 2014, from http://ic.fsc.org/ IFOAM (2012) THE IFOAM NORMS FOR ORGANIC PRODUCTION AND PROCESSING Version 2012. Retrieved on February 21, 2014, from http://www.ifoam.org/en/node Kim, I.-A., R. L. Trosper, and G.Mohs (2012) Cultural uses of non-timber forest products among the Sts'ailes, British Columbia, Canada. Forest Policy and Economics 22:40-46. Lawrence, A. (2003) No forest without timber? International Forestry Review 5(2):87-96. PEFC (2014) PEFC Global Statistics: SFM & CoC Certification. Retrieved on July 5, 2014, from http://pefc.org/ Pierce, A., P. Shanley, and S. Laird (2003) Certification of non-timber forest products: Limitations and implications of a market-based conservation tool. Paper submitted for presentation at the International Conference on Rural Livelihood, Forest and Biodiversity 19-23 May 2003, Bonn, Germany. Retrieved on December 3, 2013, from http://www.ibrarian.net/navon/page.jsp?paperid=1060329&searchTerm=implications+of+market Rainforest Alliance SmartWood Program (2007a) Rainforest Alliance/SmartWood Generic Standards for Assessing Forest Management. Retrieved on October 5, 2013, from http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/ Rainforest Alliance SmartWood Program (2007b) SmartWood Global Non Timber Forest Product Certification Addendum. Retrieved on December 24, 2013, from http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/ Ruiz–Pérez, M., B. Belcher, R. Achdiawan, M. Alexiades, C. Aubertin, J. Caballero, B. Campbell, C. Clement, T. Cunningham, A. Fantini, H. de Foresta, C. Garcia–Fernandez, K. H. Gautam, P. H. Martinez, W. de Jong, K. Kusters, M. G. Kutty, C. Lopez, M. Fu, M. A. M. Alfaro, T. K. R. Nair, O. Ndoye, R. Ocam po , N . Rai, M . R icker, K . Schreckenberg, S. Shackleton, P. Shanley, T. C. H. Sunderland, and Y. C. Youn. (2004) Markets drive the specialization strategies of forest peoples. Ecology and Society 9(2). Retrieved on October 9, 2013, from http://dspace.royalroads.ca/docs/handle/10170/477 Shackleton, C. M., and A. K. Pandey (2014) Positioning non-timber forest products on the development agenda. Forest Policy and Economics 38:1-7. Shanley, P., A. Pierce, S. Laird, and D. Robinson (2008) Beyond timber: Certification and management of non-timber forest products. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Shanley, P., A. R. Pierce, S. A. Laird, and A. Guillén (Eds.) (2002) Tapping the green market: Certification and management of non-timber forest products. London: Earthscan Publication. SmartWood (2002) Non-Timber Forest Products Certification Standards Addendum. Retrieved on October 4, 2013, from http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/forestry/documents/ntfp-addendum-generic-guidelines.pdf Sprang, P., N. Meyer-Ohlendorf, R. G. Tarasofsky, and F. Mechel. (2006) Ecologic briefs: comparing major certification schemes: FSC, PEFC, CSA, MTCC and SFI. Ecologic Institute, Berlin, Germany. UNECE/FAO (2012) Forest Products Annual Market Review, 2011-2012. Retrieved on November 19, 2012, from http://www.unece.org/forests.html UNECE/FAO (2013) Forest Products Annual Market Review, 2012-2013. Retrieved on July 24, 2012, from http://www.unece.org/forests.html Walter, S., D. Cole, W. Kathe, P. Lovett, and M. P. Soldán (2003) Impact of certification on the sustainable use of NWEP: Lessons-learnt from three case studies. Paper submitted for presentation at the International Conference on Rural Livelihood, Forest and Biodiversity 19-23 May 2003, Bonn, Germany. Retrieved on October 15, 2013, from http://foris.fao.org/static/pdf/NWFP/CIFOR_pres.pdf Wenban-Smith, M., J. Bowyer, K. Fernholz and J. Howe (2006) Combining organic and FSC certification of non-timber forest products: reducing costs, increasing options. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA: Dovetail Partners, Inc. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56853 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究針對非用材林產品驗證進行探討，先了解木材與非用材林產品間特性差異後，再將兩驗證標準分成社會、經濟、環境與管理四個面向，進行比較與分析，並建立森林管理委員會第五版原則與準則之非用材林產品驗證標準，最後探討非用材林產品驗證未來發展之趨勢，以及於台灣實施之可行性，以期為未來台灣於森林驗證中納入非用材林產品驗證提供資訊與建議。結果顯示，因為非用材林產品具有重要的社會價值，加上非用材林產品被視為促進經濟多樣化的方式之一，因此其標準主要強調於社會與經濟面向的規範，而環境與管理面向則因為收穫非用材林產品帶來的衝擊較小，故標準的要求較為簡略；未來想在台灣實施非用材林產品驗證也具備一定的可行性，只是在社會與經濟面向上需要投入較多的心力，以達成驗證標準的要求。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this thesis is to study Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFP) certification, and hope to provide information and suggestion for subsuming NTFP certification umder forest certification in Taiwan in the future. The first step is to find out the characteristic difference between timber and NTFP. Then the standards of forest management certification and NTFP certification are divided into four categories which are social, economic, environmental and administrative dimensions, for comparing and analysis. Second, NTFP certification standard for Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Principles and Criteria version 5 are developed. And the last step is to discuss the development trend of NTFP certification and the feasibility of implementing NTFP certification in Tainwan. The results show that the focus of NTFP certification standard is mainly in social and economic dimension, because of its social value and contribution of ecomonic diversity. On the other hand, requirements of standard in environmental and administrative dimension are simpler, because the impact of havesting NTFP is smaller. And there is possibility to implement NTFP certification in Tainwan. However we need to put more effort in social and economic dimension to achieve the requirements of NTFP certification standard. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T06:30:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01625015-1.pdf: 1346655 bytes, checksum: 5e7bae491ac576e7faa2c7a6cd7b2cd7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要.................................................i
Abstract............................................ii 目錄...............................................iii 圖目錄...............................................v 表目錄..............................................vi 第壹章、 緒論.........................................1 第一節、 研究背景與動機...............................1 第二節、 研究目的.....................................2 第三節、 研究流程.....................................3 第貳章、 文獻回顧.....................................5 第一節、 森林驗證概況.................................5 第二節、 非用材林產品驗證發展概況....................22 第參章、 材料與方法..................................29 第一節、 研究材料與範圍限制..........................29 第二節、 研究方法....................................29 第肆章、 非用材林產品驗證之探討......................31 第一節、 非用材林產品之定義與重要性..................31 第二節、 木材與非用材林產品特性差異..................33 第三節、 非用材林產品驗證之機會與挑戰................36 第四節、 木材與非用材林產品驗證標準之比較............41 第伍章、 建立FSC第五版非用材林產品驗證標準...........78 第陸章、 非用材林產品驗證未來趨勢....................85 第一節、 結合其他類型之驗證系統......................85 第二節、 於台灣實施之可行性分析......................91 第柒章、 結論與建議..................................97 參考文獻 ............................................99 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 永續經營 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 森林管理委員會 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 標準 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 森林驗證 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 非用材林產品 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFP) | en |
| dc.subject | forest certification | en |
| dc.subject | standard | en |
| dc.subject | Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) | en |
| dc.subject | sustainable management | en |
| dc.title | 非用材林產品驗證標準之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The study on Non-Timber Forest Products certification standard | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃裕星,林俊成 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 非用材林產品,森林驗證,標準,森林管理委員會,永續經營, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFP),forest certification,standard,Forest Stewardship Council (FSC),sustainable management, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 104 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-08 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 森林環境暨資源學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.32 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。