請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56837
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李英周 | |
dc.contributor.author | Zong-You Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳宗佑 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T05:51:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-12 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 孔騏源,2006。屏東縣萬安溪臺灣石魚賓之棲地利用與生殖生態。屏東科技大學野生動物保育研究所。生物學報,41(2):pp. 103-112
朱達仁、郭一羽、曹先紹,2004。石門水庫溪流情勢調查-期末報告書。經濟部水利署北區水資源局。 朱達仁,2009。一個溪流生態綜合性評估之模式權重估計以石門水庫自然旅遊地 為例。地理學報,55:pp. 65-95。 李啟禎,2002。核二廠出水口及其附近河口域畸形花身雞魚生態與分布之研究。 李英周、張惟哲。2007。栽培漁業的落實。台灣漁業永續發展協會會訊。5: pp. 22-23。 李英周、郭一羽、朱達仁、吳俊宗、施君翰,2009。石門水庫集水區水域指標生物習性調查及棲地環境營造計畫-期末報告書。經濟部水利署北區水資源局。 李英周、郭一羽、朱達仁、施君翰,2011。石門水庫集水區移地復育在地民眾參與生態監測及成效評估-期末報告書。經濟部水利署北區水資源局。 李英周、郭一羽、朱達仁、施君翰、張惟哲,2013。石門水庫集水區在地民眾參與及生態保育行動-期末報告書。經濟部水利署北區水資源局。 汪靜明,1991。台灣河川的生態保育。科學月刊,22(12):pp. 930-937。 呂榮琦、李英周、潘明雄,2008。魚苗放流中間育成之內涵與實施。台灣漁業永 續發展協會會訊,6,pp. 8-10。 沈世傑,1993。台灣魚類誌。國立台灣大學動物系印行,p.137。 林曜松、曹先紹、張崑雄,1989。櫻花鉤吻鮭之生殖生態與行為研究農委會生態研究第8 號。 林曜松、張崑雄、張瓊文,1990。武陵農場魚類教育中心初步規劃農委會生態研究第2 號,1p.。 林曜松、張明雄,1991。大甲溪石魚賓之族群分佈研究。農委會生態研究第002號,16p.。 林曜松、曹先紹、莊鈴川、戴永禔,1993。櫻花鉤吻鮭棲地之調查研究(Ι)-以七家灣溪上游,雪山溪為主。臺灣省農林廳林務局保育研究系列 82-07號。 林晏詩,2006。應用地形與降水資訊太討台灣櫻花鉤吻鮭淺勢物理棲地分布。國立臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文。 邵廣昭、何林泰、林介平。1993。魚類群聚生態調查監測與分析方法。生物科學36(2):pp. 41-56。 郭一羽,2003。水域生態工程。中華大學水域生態環境研究中心,滄海書局。 郭一羽、朱達仁、吳俊宗,2008。石門水庫集水區整治工程生態監測及評估-期末報告書。經濟部水利署北區水資源局。 郭金泉,2002。台灣櫻花鉤吻鮭種內基因多樣性之研究-期末報告書。內政部營建署。 郭振泰、陳弘成、朱達仁、吳俊宗、吳先琪,2006。石門水庫水質監測、水域生態環境及非點源汙染調查研究-期末報告書。經濟部水利署北區水資源局。 郭慶老,2002。台灣海洋物種之標識放流試驗。台灣海洋學刊,第40 期,第1號,pp. 13-20。 黃沂訓、黃琦妮、陳忠佑、周劭鴻、黃國昇,2002。櫻花鉤吻鮭晶片植入技術之研究。內政部營建署雪霸國家公園管理處九十一年度研究報告。 曹先紹,1988。武陵農場櫻花鉤吻鮭族群分佈與環境因子間關係之探討。國立臺灣大學動物學研究所,碩士論文。 莊鈴川,1988。櫻花鉤吻鮭(Oncorhynchus masou formosanus)資源生物學的基礎研究。國立臺灣大學漁業科學研究所,碩士論文。 許嘉恩,1991。桶后溪石魚賓之生殖生物學研究。國立臺灣大學動物學研究所,碩士論文。 陳有祺、郭一羽、朱達仁、陳曉華、張睿昇,2003。石門水庫水質監測、水域生態環境及非點源汙染調查研究-期末報告書。經濟部水利署北區水資源局。 曾晴賢,1981。臺灣的平鰭鰍科魚類。中國文化大學,碩士論文。 曾晴賢,1990。臺灣的淡水魚(1)。臺灣野生動物資源調查手冊(3)。農委會81p.。 梁世雄、林曜松,1996。第六章外表型態測量。台灣野生動物調查-斷水漁資源調查手冊,pp. 50-56。 能勢幸雄、石井丈夫、清水誠,1988。第一章水產資源的單位與組成。水產資源學,東京大學出版社,pp. 7-32。 張士晃,1994。哈盆溪臺灣鏟頷魚(Varicorhinus barbatulus)之族群生態學研究。國立臺灣大學動物學研究所,碩士論文。 張明雄,1989。有勝溪台灣纓口鰍(Crossostoma lacustre)之生態學研究。國立臺灣師範大學生物研究所,碩士論文。 張恆文、朱達仁,2002。石門水庫防砂壩總體檢-期末報告書。經濟部水利署北區水資源局。 楊宜勳,2008。台灣櫻花鉤吻鮭胃內含物組成與食餌習性。國立海洋大學水產養殖學系,碩士論文。 楊芷毓,2011。石門水庫集水區湳仔溝溪之台灣馬口魚族群生態學研究。國立臺灣大學漁業科學研究所,碩士論文。 詹榮桂、莊鈴川、林曜松、張崑雄,1991。臺灣陸封型櫻鮭型測定及其他Oncorhynchus 屬魚種間之比較研究。農委會生態研究第001 號。 鄭豐洲、張永明、曾萬年,1996。花身雞魚的耳石成長與生活履歷關係之研究。 台灣水產學會刊,23(2):pp. 79-94。 熊文俊,1999。臺灣馬口魚(Zacco babata)繁養殖及環境生物學研究。國立臺灣大學動物學研究所,博士論文。 顏俊雄,1993。哈盆溪臺灣馬口魚(Zacco babata)族群生態學之初步探討。國立臺灣師範大學生物研究所,碩士論文。 Acolas, M.L., Roussel, J.M., Lebel, J.M. and Bagliniere, J.L., 2007. Laboratory experiment on survival, growth and tag retention following PIT injection into the body cavity of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta). Fisheries Research, 86:pp. 280-284. Babaluk, J.A. and Campbell, J.S., 1987. Preliminary results of tetracycline. Labeling for validating annual growth increments in opercula of walleyes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 7: pp.138-141. Bailey, N.T.J., 1951. On estimating the size of mobile populations from recapture data. Biometrika, 38: pp. 293-306. Beverton, T.J.H. and Holt, S.J., 1957. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fish Invest Ser.Ⅱ,19,533 p. Bilton, H.T., 1986. Marking chum salmon fry vertebrae with oxytetracycline. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 6: pp.126-128. Bordner, C.E., Doroshov S.I., Hinton D.E., Pipkin R.E., Fridley R.B. and Haw F., 1990. Evaluation of marking techniques for juvenile and adult white sturgeons reared in captivity. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 7, pp. 293-303. Brown, M.L. and Sauver, T.St., 2002. An assessment of yellow perch, Perca flavescens, stocking contributions in eastern South Dakota lakes. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 9 :pp. 225–234. Bryant, M.D., Dolloff, C.A., Porter P.E., and Wright B.E., 1990. Freeze branding with CO2 : an effective and easy-to-use field method to mark fish. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 7, pp. 30-35. Coombs, K.A., Bailey, J.K., Herbinger, C.M. and Friars, G.W., 1990. Evaluation of various external marking techniques for Atlantic salmon. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 7, pp. 142-146. Cook, R.C. and Lord, G.E., 1978. Identification of stocks of Bristol Bay sockeye salmon Oncorhyncus nerka, by evaluating scale patterns with a polynomial discriminant function. Fishery Bulletin, 76, pp. 415–423. Champigneulle, A. and Cachera, S., 2003. Evaluation of large-scale stocking of early stages of brown trout, Salmo trutta, to angler catches in the French–Swiss part of the River Doubs. Fisheries Management and Ecology. 10, pp. 79–85. Chang, W.C., Lee, Y.C. and Shih, C.H., 2008. The determination of mass marking methods with high marks retention rate for hatchery-reared fry. Journal of the Fisheries Society of Taiwan. 35(2), pp. 185-194. Darlinton, P.J., 1957. Zoogeography. John Wiley: New York. Delany, M.J., 1978. Introduction: marking animals for research. In B. Stomehouse, editor. Animal Marking: Recognition Marking of Animals in Research. University Park Press, Baltimore, Maryland. pp. 3-10. Evrard, G. 2005. Use and effect of freeze branding on roach(Rutilus rutilus L.). Bulletin Francais Peche Piscic. 374, pp3. 35-42. Everst, F.H. and Edmundson E.H., 1967. Cold branding for field use in marking juvenile Salmons, The progressive Fish-culturist, 29(3), pp. 175-176. Fowler, G.M. and Stobo, W.T., 1999. Effects of release parameters on recovery rates of tagged ground fish species. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 56 (10), pp. 1732–1751. Frenkel, V., Kindschi, G. and Zohar, Y., 2002. Noninvasive, mass marking of fish by immersion in calcein: evaluation of fish size and ultrasound exposure on mark endurance. Aquaculture, 214, pp. 169-183. Haw, F., Bergman, P.K., Fralick, R.A., Buckley, R.M. and Blankenship, H.L., 1990. Visible implanted fish tag. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 7, pp. 311-315. Hettler, W.F., 1984. Marking otoliths by immersion of marine fish larvae in tetracycline. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 113, pp. 370-373. Hilborn R., Walters, C.J. and Jester, D.B., 1990. Value of Fish Marking in Fisheries Management. In Fish Marking Techniques, American Fisheries Society 7. Proceedings of the International Symposium and Educational Workshop on Fish-Marking Tecniques, University of Washington. pp. 5-7. Hsu, H.H., Joung, S.J., Liao, Y.Y. and Liu, K.M., 2007. Satellite tracking of juvenile whale sharks, Rhincodon typus, in the northwestern Pacific. Fisheries Research 84, pp. 25-31. Lord, R.F., 1934. Hatchery trout as foragers and game fish. Transactions of The American Fisheries Society, 64, pp. 339-345. Malone, J.C., Forrester, G.E. and M.A. Steele., 1999. Effects of subcutaneous microtags on the growth, survival, and vulnerability to predation of small reef fishes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 237, pp. 243-253. McFarlane, G.A., Wydowski, R.S. and Prince, E.D., 1990. External tags and marks,historical review of the development of external tags and marks. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 7, pp. 9-29. Moring, J.R., 1990. Marking and Tagging Intertidal Fishes: Review of Techniques.American Fisheries Society Symposium, 7, pp. 109-116. Nielson, B.R., 1990. Twelve-Year Overview of Fluorescent Grit Marking of CutthroatTrout in Bear Lake, Utah-Idaho. American Fisheries Symposium, 7, pp.42-46. Phinney, D.E., Miller, D.M. and Dahlberg M.L., 1967. Mass-marking young Salmonids with fluorescent pigment. Transactions of The American Fisheries Society, 96(2), pp. 157-162. Pickering, A.D., Pottinger, T.G. and Christie, P., 1982. Recovery of the Brown Trout, Salmo-Trutta-L, from Acute Handling Stress-a Time-Course Study. Journal of Fish Biology, 20(2), pp. 229-224. Priyadarshana, T., Asaeda, T. and Manatunge, J., 2006. Hunger-induced foraging behavior of two cyprind fish: Pseudorasbora parva and Rasbora Daniconius. Hydrobiologia, 568, pp. 341-352. Richkus, W.A., 1978. A quantitative study of inter tide-pool movement of the woolly sculpin Clinocottus analis. Marine Biology(Berlin), 49, pp. 277-284. Ricker, W.E., 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 191, pp. 1–382. Ross, W.R. and Packard, A., 1990. Use of Scale Patterns and Shape as Discriminators between Wild and Hatchery Striped Bass Stocks in California. Fish marking techniques. American Fisheries Society Symposium 7, pp. 71–77. Sato, R., 1959. The use of probability paper for the graphical analysis of percent age compositions of chum salmon with different scale characteristics. Tohoku Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(1), pp. 75-87. Schmidt, J., 1923. The breeding place of the eel. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, 211, pp. 179-208 Simond, R.C. and Noble, R.E., 1968. Hybridization in Oncorhynchus (Salmonidae), I.Viability and inheritance in artificial crosses of chum and pink salmon. Transactions of The American Fisheries Society, 97(2), pp. 109-118. Smith. J.R.,1973. Branding chinook, Choho, and Sockeye Salmon Fry with hot and cold metals tools. The preogressive Fish-Culturist, 35(2), pp. 94-96. Walsh, M.G., Bjorgo, K.A. and Isely, J.J., 2000. Effects of implantation method and temperature on mortality and loss of simulated transmitters in hybrid striped bass. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129, pp. 539-544. Walton, I. and Cotton, C., 1898. The complete angler, of the contemplative man’s recreation. Little, Brown, Boston. Youngs, W.D. and Robson, D.S., 1978. Estimation of population number and mortality rates. In: Methods for assessment of fish production in freshwaters. T.B. Bevgenal, (Ed.). 3rd Edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp. 137–164. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56837 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 台灣溪流魚類研究大多以族群分佈、生殖生物與生態環境為主,卻鮮少有標識放流的相關研究,而標識魚類後放流通常是研究魚群大小、移動。魚苗放流通常短時間大量標識,因此如何找出省時、成本低、合適標識方法且檢測容易是非常重要的研究課題。本研究目的為利用液態氮冷烙與浸泡四環黴素雙重標識法研究石門水庫集水區台灣鏟頷魚(Onychostoma barbatulum)增殖放流。在2011年11月24日放流600尾、2012年6月11日放流1,100尾、2012年9月12日放流1,000尾於石門水庫集水區上游雪霧鬧溪,在2012年6月11日放流後連續兩個月因颱風侵襲導致放流魚無法回收再捕。
在殘存率與標識留存率方面,側線組與空白組之間沒有顯著差異,但腹部組跟側線組與空白組有顯著差異(P<0.05)。資源量方面利用Petersen法估得前期資源量尾數估值介於1,636±28 - 4,428±39之間,後期介於1,233±14 - 2,509±23之間。放流貢獻率前期介於13.6% - 36.7% 之間,後期介於39.9% - 81.1% 之間。 利用Ricker修正式估得前期放流相似年級群資源量尾數估值介於1,824±16 - 4,307±27之間,後期資源量尾數估值介於43±4 - 1,502±12之間。放流貢獻率前期介於16.0% - 23.9% 之間,後期介於17.3% - 66.0% 之間。因此利用魚體背部冷烙標識及浸泡四環黴素的雙重標識法可以有效用來估算該河段台灣鏟頷魚的資源承載量。 關鍵字:台灣鏟頷魚、雙重標識、增殖放流、族群量、放流貢獻率 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Most studies on population distribution, reproduction biology and environment ecology of freshwater fish in Taiwan, but about population size, movement, and assessment of wild population were a few. They can be approached by release and recapture of marking fish. The mass fish fry were usually marked and released in a short time. Therefore, to find the appropriately marking methods with time-saving, low cost, and easy detecting is important. The purpose of this study is to investigate the stream proliferation stocking of Taiwan shovelijaw carp (Onychostoma barbatulum) by a liquid nitrogen branding and tetracycline immersing double marking method in Shihmen Reservoir watershed. Six hundred individuals in 24 November 2011, one thousand and one hundred in 11 June 2012 and one thousand in 14 September 2012 were stocking to the Xuewunao stream in Shihmen Reservoir watershed. Among them, the stocking individuals in 11 June 2012 were all not recovered because there were two continued typhoon invaded for following two months.
The survival and mark retention rates for the lateral line treatment and the control treatment were not significant different, however they were significantly different with that of the abdomen treatment (P<0.05) in previous tests. The estimated population size in the experimental sectors were 1,636±28 - 4,428±39 for the first period between November 2011 and April 2012 and 1,233±14 - 2,509±23 for the second period between September 2012 and August 2013 by Petersen method. The stocking contribution rates were 13.6%- 36.7% for the first period and 39.9%- 81.1% for the second period. The estimated population size for the stocking cohort was 1,824±16 - 4,307±27 for the period between November 2011 and April 2012, and was 43±4 - 1,520±12 for the period between September 2012 and August 2013 by Ricker method. The stocking contribution rates were 16.0%- 23.9% for the first period and 17.3%- 66.0% for the second period. Therefore, the population capacity for the Taiwan shovelijaw carp in the sectors can be effectively estimated by a liquid nitrogen branding and tetracycline immersing double marking method. Keywords:Onychostoma barbatulum, Double marking, Proliferation stocking, Population size, Contribution rate | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T05:51:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R99b45019-1.pdf: 3426416 bytes, checksum: 73a1eb8a340c24bf5f3dc4ad76c8c03a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
Abstract II 目錄 IV 表目錄 VI 圖目錄 VII 照片目錄 VIII 第一章 前言 1 1.1 台灣溪流魚類研究回顧 1 1.2 資源復育與增殖放流現況 2 1.3 標識方法回顧 3 1.4 石門水庫上游集水區研究 4 1.5 研究目的 4 第二章 材料與方法 6 2.1 實驗魚種 6 2.2 實驗地點 6 2.3 試驗設計 6 2.4 統計分析與檢定 9 第三章 結果 12 3.1 先前試驗 12 3.2 資源量估值 12 3.3 體重對體長關係式 14 第四章 討論與結論 15 4.1 標識試驗 15 4.2 資源量估值 16 4.3 體重對體長關係式 17 4.4 未來研究方向與放流建議 19 4.5 結論 20 參考文獻 21 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 石門水庫集水區台灣鏟頷魚溪流增殖放流之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Stream proliferation stocking of Taiwan shovelijaw carp (Onychostoma barbatulum) in Shihmen Reservoir watershed | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 莊守正,朱達仁,郭世榮,施君翰 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 台灣鏟頷魚,雙重標識,增殖放流,族群量,放流貢獻率, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Onychostoma barbatulum,Double marking,Proliferation stocking,Population size,Contribution rate, | en |
dc.relation.page | 47 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-08 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 漁業科學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 漁業科學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.35 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。