請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56481完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃恆獎(Heng-Chiang Huang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ying-Chu Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳瀅竹 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T05:30:43Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-01-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-14 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文文獻
文崇一、楊國樞（2000），《社會科學及行為科學研究法下冊》，台北：東華。 石偉、黃崗（2010），〈時間維度上的自我評價〉，《西南大學學報（社會科學版）》，2010年05期。 吳芝儀、廖梅（2001），〈質性研究入門-紮根理論研究方法〉，台北：濤石。（原 著：Anselm Strauss Juliet Corbin, “Basics of Qualitative Research”, 1998） 林世欣（1999），〈國中學生自我概念與同儕關係之相關研究〉，屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所，碩士論文。 林家屏（2002），〈青少年自我概念與行為困擾之相關研究〉，成功大學教育研究所，碩士論文。 林碧嬌、邱文彬（2007），〈餐旅科大專生英語成就與正向錯覺及自我效能的關係： . 自我顯揚偏誤的啟發〉。餐旅暨家政學刊，4(1)，21-35。 胡幼慧（1996），《轉型中的質性研究──演變、批判和女性主義研究觀點》，台北：巨流。 施美玲（1997），《大眾傳播研究方法》，台北：五南。 袁 方（2002），《社會研究方法》，台北：五南。 郭為藩（1996），《自我心理學》，台北：師大書苑。 陳向明（2002），《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南。 陳金英（2004），〈低收入戶青少年的「可能自我」 ─ 脫貧方案的初步成效〉，《學校與家庭社會工作學刊》，147- 201。 陳彥君（2008），〈績效回饋之評價與反應之研究：探討回饋方向、回饋方式及文化我之互動結果〉，臺灣大學商學研究所，博士論文。 陳俞霖（2002）。〈網路同儕型塑及對青少年社會化影響之探討〉，《資訊社會研究》，3，149-181。 陳昺麟（2001），〈社會科學質化研究之紮根理論實施程序及實例之介紹〉，勤易學報第十九期，327-342。 陳淑貞、翁毓秀（2006），〈非行少年依附、解釋風格與自我概念之相關研究，輔導與諮商學報〉，28(1)，29-50。 黃光玉、劉念夏、陳清文譯（2004），《媒介與傳播研究方法：質化與量化研究途徑》，台北：風雲論壇。（原書Arthur A. Burger[2000]. Media and Communication Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches） 張春興（1987），《心理學》，台北市：東華。 葉乃靜（1996），〈從量化走向質化的圖書館學與資訊科學研究〉，資訊傳播與圖書館第二卷第4期，76。 萬文隆（2004），〈深度訪談在質性研究中的應用〉，《生活科技教育月刊》，三十七卷第四期，17-23。 鄭景鴻（2012），〈Facebook上品牌訊息分享的探索研究—檢驗以品牌表達自我的重要性〉，世新大學公共關係暨廣告學研究所，碩士論文。 鄭學慧（2009），〈影響國中生自我概念之因素探討〉，國立台北護理學院護理研究所，碩士論文。 蘇玲慧（2013），〈高中職自我概念、同儕互動與學習自我效能關係之研究〉，台北市立教育大學教育學系，博士論文。 二、英文文獻 Aaker, J. L. (1999). The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing, 36, 45–57. Ahuvia, A. C. (2005). Beyond the extended self: Loved objects and consumers’ identity narratives. Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (1), 171-184. Albert, S. (1977). Temporal Comparison Theory. Psychological Review 84: 485- 503. Alicke, M., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 1–48. Babbie, E. (1998). The Practice Social Research (8th). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. Bahl, S. (2005). Multiple selves and the meanings they give to consumptions, unpublished dissertation. University of Massachusetts Amherst. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the ‘‘true self’’ on the internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33–48. Batra, R., Lehmann, D. R., Singh D. (1993). The brand personality component of brand goodwill: Some antecedents and consequences. Brand Equity and Advertising. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 83–96 Belk, Russell W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (September), 139-168. Berg, B. L. (1989). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Allyn & Bacon: Needham Heights, MA. Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S.J. ( 1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach to the social sciences. New York: John Wiley. Boyd, D. (2004). Friendster and Publicly Articulated Social Networks. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004), 1279-1282. ACM Press. Vienna, April 24-29 Boyd, D., & Ellison, N.B. (2007) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. Buten, J. (1996). Personal homepage survey. Retrieved March 6, 2007, from http://www.nicola.doering.de/Hogrefe/buten/www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/sbuten/phpi.htm Byrne, B.M. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54, 427-456. Cannell, C. R, & Kohn, R .L. (1968). Interviewing. In G. Lindzey & E. Aaronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, 2, 526-595. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Collins, R. L. (1996). For better or for worse: The impact of upward social comparisons on self-evaluations. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 51-69. Douglas, J. D. (1976). Investigative Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Ellison, N. B., Heino, R. D., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2). Fandt, P. M., & Ferris, G.R. (1990). The management of information and impressions: When employees behave opportunistically. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 45, 140 -158. Fennis, B.M., Pruyn, A. H., & Maasland, M. (2005). Revisiting the Malleable Self: Brand Effects on Consumer Self-Perceptions of Personality Traits . Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 371-377. Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes, Human Relations, 7, 40-117. Firat, A.F., Venkatesh, A. (1995) Liberatory postmodernism and the reenchantment of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 82-239 Gallagher S. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of the Self. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press Gibbons, F. X., & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129-142. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books. Gosling, S. D., Gaddis, D., & Vazire, S. (2007). Personality impressions based on Facebook profiles. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (Boulder, Colorado, USA, March 26–28, 2007). Greenhaus, J.H. & Powell, G.H. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 72–92. Grubb, E.L., and Grathwohl, H.L. (1967). Consumer Self-Concept, Symbolism and Market Behavior: A Theoretical Approach. Journal of Marketing, 31 (Oct), 22-27. Haferkamp, N. & Krämer, N. C. (2010). Creating a digital self. Impression management and impression formation on social networking sites. In K. Drotner & K. C. Schrøder (Eds.), Digital Content Creation: Perceptions, Practices & Perspectives, 129-146. New York: Peter Lang. Hansford, B.C., & Hattie, J.A.(1982). The relationship between self and achievement / performance measures. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 123-142 Heine, S. J. (2005). Where is the evidence for pancultural self-enhancement? A reply to Sedikides, Gaertner, and Toguchi (2003). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 531-538. Hollenbeck, C. R., & Andrew M. K. (2012). Consumers' use of brands to reflect their actual and ideal selves on Facebook. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 395-405. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum:Qualitative Research, 7 (1), 21. Krämer, N. C. & Winter, S. (2008). Impression Management 2.0 - The Relationship of Self-Esteem, Extraversion, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Presentation Within Social Networking Sites. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 106-116. Lenaghan, J. A., Sengupta, K. (2007). Role Conflict, Role Balance and Affect: A Model of Well-being of the Working Student. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 9(1), 88-109. Lietz, C. A., & Zayas, L. E. (2010). Evaluating qualitative research for social work practitioners. Advances in Social Work, 11, 188-202. Liu, H. (2007). Social Network Profiles as Taste Performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 252-275. Malhotra, N. K. (1987). Self-Concept and Product Choice: An Integrated Perspective. Journal of Economic Psychology 9 (March), 1–28. Markus, H., & Kunda, Z. (1986). Stability and malleability in the self-concept in the perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(4), 858-866. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954-969. Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L.W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337. Merton, R. (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press. Michikyan. M., Denni. J. & Subrahmanyam, K. (2014). Can you guess who I am? Real, ideal and false self-presentation on Facebook among emerging adults. Manuscript submitted for publication. Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods, qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Interpersonal vs. intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197-1208. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 137-145. Roberts, B. W., & Donahue, E. M. (1994). One personality, multiple selves: Integrating personality and social roles. Journal of Personality. 62, 201-218. Robins, R.W., Beer, J.S. (2001) Positive Illusions About the Self: Short-Term Benefits and Long-Term Costs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 340-352. Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. Rosenberg, J., & Egbert, N. (2011). Online impression management: Personality traits and concern for secondary goals as predictors of self-presentation tactics on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 1-18 Ross, M., & Wilson, A. E. (2000). Constructing and appraising past selves. In D. L. Schacter & E. Scarry (Eds.), Memory, Brain, and Belief, 231-258. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Salimkhan G., Manago A., Greenfield P. (2010). The construction of the virtual self on Myspace. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 1–18. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole. Chapters 6-7, 168-233. Schmitt, M.T., Silvia, P.J., Branscombe, N.R. (2000). The intersection of self-evaluation maintenance and social identity theories: intragroup judgment in interpersonal and intergroup contexts. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull, 26, 606-1598. Sieber, S. (1974). Toward a Theory of Role Accumulation, American Sociological Review, 39 (August), 78-567. Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Toguchi, Y. (2003). Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 60-70. Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 402-407. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, J. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441. Sirgy, M. J. (1985). Using Self-Congruity and Ideal Congruity to Predict Purchase Motivation. Journal of Business Research, 13, 195-206. Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self‐affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 21, 261–302. New York: Academic Press. Strizhakova, Y., Coulter, R. A., & Price, L. L. (2008). Branded products as a passport to global citizenship: Perspectives from developed and developing countries. Journal of International Marketing, 16(4), 57–85. Stryker, S., and Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. Handbook of Social Psychology. 1 (Eds.) G. Lindzey, and E. Aronson (New York: Random House), 311–378. Suls, J., & Mullen, B. (1982). From the cradle to the grave: Comparison and self-evaluation across the life-span. In J. Suls (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self, 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations, 33-48. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Taylor, S. E. & Brown, J. D. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116 (1), 21–27. Taylor, S.E., Neter, E., & Wayment H.A. (1995). Self-evaluation processes. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 21, 1278-1287. Tesser, A. (1988) Towards a self-evaluative maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 21, 181-227, Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 531–549. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster. Wattanasuwan, K. (2005). The self and symbolic consumption. Journal of American Academy of Business, 6 (1), 179–185. Wayment, H. A. & Taylor, S. E. (1995). Self-evaluation processes: Motives, information use, and self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 63, 729-757 Wills, T.A. (1981). Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-271. Wilson, R.E., Gosling, S.D., & Graham, L.T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 203–220. Wilson, A. E., & Ross, M. (2000). The frequency of temporal-self and social comparisons in people's personal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 928-942. Wheeler, L. (1966). Motivation as a determinant of upward comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Supplement, 1, 27-31 Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 231–248. Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self-concept. Vol. 2. Theory and research on selected topics. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research, design and methods (3rd Eds.), 5. Thousand Oaks: Sage. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56481 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 自我概念的討論是哲學、社會學、心理學乃至於消費者行為學者長年關注的領域，隨網際網路和Web 2.0的發展，自我概念的研究逐漸拓展到社群網站，但仍屬於一塊新興領域。本研究希冀能夠探索Facebook使用者如何藉由在個人頁面上揭露品牌資訊，以建構其自我概念，因此透過質化研究的深度訪談方式，收集了12位受訪者的訪談資料，輔以受訪者過去2年在Facebook所張貼的所有品牌資訊，並分別由以下三個面向來探討線上自我建構：
1. 自我彰顯：訪談結果顯示受訪者會主要藉由時間維度的自我比較，有時也會透過社會比較，藉此證明自己比過去更出色或能夠達成理想自我，以此來提升自我評價，這中間的機制可能會用品牌資訊揭露來達成。 2. 自我維持：多重的社會角色會透過內化而衍伸出對應的多重自我，受訪者在揭露品牌資訊時，會以幾種應對方式來處理多重自我的衝突，進而透過線上印象管理，使得呈現出的形象與整體自我概念一致，因此能夠達到多重自我綜效，維持現在自我的穩定與平衡。 3. 自我保護：與理想自我相反，Facebook使用者可能會有害怕或不希望成為的恐懼自我，本研究透過瞭解受訪者恐懼自我的樣態，並探討如何運用線上印象管理，使得所揭露的品牌資訊不致促使恐懼自我產生。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The following research is going to explore Facebook users’ brand information disclosure behavior, their construction of self-concept and the relationship between both. The study was accomplished by qualitative research method that the researcher has held 12 in-depth interviews with selected Facebook users and has collected data from not only interviews but also all the brand information on the users’ Facebook “Wall” of the past 2 years. Therefore, the researcher is able to understand how the respondents construct their online self-concept by the following three aspects:
1.Self-Enhancement: The thesis shows that respondents use temporary self-comparison and social comparison with brand information to prove they’re better than their past selves or able to achieve their ideal selves. Consequently, the users could enhance their self-evaluation. 2.Self-Maintenance: With internalization, multiple social roles could evolve into multiple role-specific selves. The respondents show that they adopt several coping strategies to deal with multiple selves conflict while they’re disclosing brand information, and manage their general self-concept by online impression management. As a result, the respondents reveal that they have ability to achieve multiple selves synergy. 3.Self-Protection: The research attempts to investigate the details and content of the respondents’ feared selves, and takes efforts to understand how Facebook users’ avoid their feared selves being created by their brand information disclosure behavior with online impression management skills. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T05:30:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-102-R01724033-1.pdf: 3968341 bytes, checksum: 4f7b91efffd5f9a1347dfae3b18379af (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機與研究問題 4 第三節 研究流程 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 自我概念 6 第二節 社會認同理論與自我評價 10 第三節 過去、現在與未來自我 14 第四節 多重自我與社會角色 18 第三章 研究方法 21 第一節 質化研究方法 21 第二節 受訪者選擇 25 第三節 訪談方式與流程 30 第四節 訪談大綱 32 第四章 訪談結果討論 36 第一節 線上自我建構 36 第二節 自我彰顯（Self-Enhancement） 38 第三節 自我維持（Self-Maintenance） 48 第四節 自我保護（Self-Protection） 56 第五章 結論 60 第一節 研究結論 60 第二節 研究貢獻與管理意涵 61 第三節 研究限制 62 第四節 未來研究方向 63 附錄 參考文獻 64 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | Facebook使用者品牌資訊揭露行為與自我概念之建構 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Construction of Facebook Users’ Self-concept and Their Brand Information Disclosure Behavior | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 江季芸(Chi-Yun Chiang),王仕茹(Shih-Ju Wang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | Facebook,自我概念,品牌資訊,多重自我,理想自我,恐懼自我, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Facebook,self-concept,brand information,multiple selves,ideal selves,feared selves, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 70 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-14 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-102-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.88 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。