請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56314
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張宏浩(Hung-Hao Chang) | |
dc.contributor.author | I-Chun Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳宜君 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T05:23:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-21 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-21 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王俊豪、張宏浩,2012。「農民福利制度規劃之研究-農民福利施行對象與制度之規劃研究」。行政院農業委員會科技計畫研究報告。101農科-5.2.1-輔-#2。臺灣大學。
行政院主計總處,2011。「2011年行業別統計表」。http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct_view.asp?xItem=35482&ctNode=3267 行政院主計總處,2013。「2013歷年中央政府收支概況表」。http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas01/102/102Ctab/102C歷年中央政府收支概況表.xls 行政院主計總處,2014。「農林漁牧業普查-2010年查詢系統」。http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/np.asp?ctNode=2835 行政院勞動部勞工保險局,2011。「農保簡介」。臺北:行政院勞動部勞工保險局。http://www.bli.gov.tw/sub.aspx?a=RxE1RBebaZo%3d 行政院勞動部勞工保險局,2012。「如何申請老農津貼」。臺北:行政院勞動部勞工保險局。http://www.bli.gov.tw/sub.aspx?a=kO3eX7rlSmw%3d 行政院勞動部勞工保險局,2013。「2013年統計年報」。臺北:行政院勞動部勞工保險局。http://www.bli.gov.tw/sub.aspx?a=jcnRyRZE93Y%3d 行政院勞動部勞工保險局,2013。「參加農保的資格」。臺北:行政院勞動部勞工保險局。http://www.bli.gov.tw/sub.aspx?a=QUP3B9J7TI4%3d 行政院農業委員會,2013。「2012年農業統計年報」。臺北:行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會,2013。「2012年農業統計要覽」。臺北:行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會,2014。「農業統計資料查詢-動態查詢」。臺北:行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會,2014。「農業統計資料查詢-常用統計」。臺北:行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會,2014。「農業統計資料查詢-農業指標」。臺北:行政院農業委員會。 行政院農業委員會農糧署,2012。「中華民國2011年臺灣地區農家戶口抽樣調查報告」。南投:行政院農業委員會農糧署。 陳清春,2005。「臺灣農民健康保險制度及其改進之研究」。碩士論文,國立臺灣海洋大學應用經濟研究所。 黃台心,2008。『計量經濟學』。臺北:雙葉。 劉清榕、李青松、張明瑜,1998。「農家婦女農業勞動參與之研究」,『臺灣經濟』。255期,18-36。 Ahearn, M.C., H. El-Osta, and J. Dewbre, 2006. “The impact of coupled and decoupled government subsidies on off-farm labor participation of U.S. farm operators,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 88(2):393-408. Ardington, C., A. Case, and V. Hosegood, 2009. “Labor supply responses to large social transfer: longitudinal evidence from South Africa,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 1(1):22-48. Bennefield, R., 1994. “Dynamics of economic well-being: health insurance, 1990 to 1992,” Current Population Reports, Household Economic Studies, No.70-37. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce. Bertrand, M., S. Mullainathan, and D. Miller, 2003. “Public policy and extended families: evidence from pensions in South Africa,” World Bank Economic Review. 17(1):27-49. Biddlecom, A., A. Hermalin, M. Ofstedal, M.C. Chang, and Y.L. Chuang, 2001. “Tradeoffs between public and private economic support of the elderly: results from a natural experiment in Taiwan,” Elderly in Asia Report, No.01-58. Population Study Center, University of Michigan. Cameron, A.C., P.K. Trivedi, F. Milne, and J. Piggott, 1988. “A microeconometric model of the demand for health care and health insurance in Australia,” The Review of Economic Studies. 55(1):85-106. Case, A., and A. Deaton, 1998. “Large cash transfers to the elderly in South Africa.” Economic Journal. 108(450):1330-1361. Chang, H.H., 2013. “Old farmer pension program and farm succession: evidence from a population-based survey of farm households in Taiwan,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 95(4):976-991. Chuang, J.C.C., 2011. “Do social allowance transfers crowd out private transfers? An analysis of responses among elderly households in Taiwan,” International Journal of Social Welfare. 21(2):194-202. Doty, M., S.R. Collins, S.D. Rustgi, and J.L. Kriss, 2008. “Seeing red: the growing burden of medical bills and debt faced by U.S. families,” The Commonwealth Fund Issue Brief, pub. 42:1-12. Fan, E., 2010a. “Who benefits from public old age pensions? Evidence from a targeted program,” Economic Development and Cultural Change. 58(2):297-322. Fan, E., 2010b. “Does public income induce more consumption?” Economic Record. 86(272):15-27. Glauben, T., M. Petrick, H. Tietje, and C. Weiss, 2009. “Probability and timing of succession or closure in family firms: a switching regression analysis of farm households in Germany,” Applied Economics. 41(1):45-54. Greene, W.H., 2008. Econometric analysis. 6th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Gripp, S.I., A. Elbehri, R.D. Yonkers, S.A. Ford, and A.E. Luloff, 1993. “Summary report of 1993 telephone survey with Pennsylvania dairy farm managers.” Research Report, A.E. & R.S. No. 245. Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Pennsylvania State University. Gripp, S.I., and S.A. Ford, 1998. “Health insurance coverage for Pennsylvania dairy farm managers,” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 26(2):174-183. Gruber, J., and B.C. Madrian, 2002. “Health insurance, labor supply and job mobility: a critical review of the literature,” NBER Working Paper Series, No. 8817. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Hurd, M.D., and K. McGarry, 1997. “Medical insurance and the use of health care services by the elderly,” Journal of Health Economics. 16(2):129-154. Jensen, H., and W. Saupe, 1987. “Determinants of health insurance coverage for farm family households: a mid-western study,” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics. 9(1):145-55. Jensen, R.T., 2004. “Do private transfers “displace” the benefit of public transfers? Evidence from South Africa,” Journal of Public Economics. 88(1-2):89-112. Jones, C.A., T.S. Parker, M. Ahearn, A.K. Mishra, and J.N. Variyam, 2009. “Health status and health care access of farm and rural populations,” Economic Information Bulletin, No. 72. Economic Research Service, USDA. Kimhi, A., 1994. “Optimal timing of farm transferal from parent to child,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 76(2):228-236. Klasen, S., and I. Woolard, 2009. “Surviving unemployment without state support: unemployment and household formation in South Africa,” Journal of African Economies. 18(1):1-51. Lai, M.S., and M. Orsuwan, 2009. “Examining the impact of Taiwan’s cash allowance program on private households,” World Development. 37(7):1250-1260. Long, J.S., and J. Freese, 2006. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, 2nd ed. Texas: Stata Press. Lottero, B., C. Pryor, M. Rukavina, J. Prottas, and A. Knudson, 2007. “2007 Health insurance survey of farm and ranch operators,” The Access Project Issue Brief. No. 1, September, Boston, MA. Lovo, S., 2011. “Pension transfers and farm household technical efficiency: evidence from South Africa,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 93(5):1391-1405. Maddala, G.S., 1983. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press. McNamara, P.E., 2001. “Health insurance coverage of Illinoisans: an analysis of the current situation, trends, and correlated health behavior using BRFSS data,” Illinois Department of Public Health. Mishra, A.K., and H.S. El-Osta, 2008. “Effect of agricultural policy on succession decisions of farm households,” Review of Economics of the Household. 6(3):285-307. Mishra, A.K., H.S. El-Osta, and M.C. Ahearn, 2012. “Health care expenditures of self-employed farm households in the United States,” Agricultural Economics. 43(1):75-88. Monheit, A.C., J.P. Vistnes, and J.M. Eisenberg, 2001. “Moving to Medicare: trends in the health insurance status of near-elderly workers, 1987–1996,” Health Affairs. 20(2):204-213. Ranchhod, V., 2006. “The effect of the South African old age pension on labour supply of the elderly,” South African Journal of Economics. 74(4):725-744. Roodman, D., 2011. “Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp,” The Stata Journal. 11(2):159-206. Sun, A., K. Eggleston, and Z. Zhan, 2013. “The impact of rural pensions in China on migration and off-farm employment of adult children and extended households’ living arrangements,” Working paper, August 2013. U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2008. “Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage of people in the United States: 2007,” Current Population Reports, Series P60-233, http://www.census.gov/prod/2008pubs/p60-235.pdf. Ward, R.A., 1975. The Economics of health resources. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley. Ziller, E.C., and A.F. Coburn, 2003. “Health insurance coverage of the rural and urban near elderly,” Working Paper, No. 27, Maine Rural Health Research Center, Portland, ME. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56314 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 臺灣農民福利政策是以農民健康保險為發展軸心,並以老農津貼為輔,進而改善農業經營環境與提高農民福利,然而在貫徹農民福利政策時,卻產生財政支出龐大等問題,又因臺灣農業人口高齡化現象,造成財政負擔有增無減,諸多因素皆顯示目前農民福利政策需要做調整。不過在制度改革之前,須要先全盤瞭解目前臺灣農民投保現況與老農津貼對農家經濟行為之影響。以往文獻只針對單一保險做探討,無法全面瞭解臺灣農民投保狀況,而且老農津貼政策對農家經濟之影響,也只著重在農家生產力、資金轉移以及對其他家庭成員之排擠效果,有鑑於此,本研究將彌補過往文獻之不足,嘗試更全面、更完整的清查目前臺灣農民於不同社會保險之分佈情況,與老農津貼如何影響家庭農業、非農業所得,以及老農津貼排擠家庭成員至何種農場外工作型態,以補足臺灣社會保險與老農津貼相關文獻缺漏之處。
本文利用2011年臺灣地區農家戶口抽樣調查資料探討7,270農戶,其中包含7,270位農業指揮者以及10,918位19至55歲之家庭成員(不包括農業指揮者),並採用Multinomial Logit Model、Recursive Mixed-Nonlinear Model以及Mixture Simultaneous Equation System作為實證模型。實證結果顯示,家中滿十五歲以上人數、農牧戶類型、總耕地面積與指揮者年齡皆對農家指揮者投保農、漁保以及領取老農津貼有顯著影響效果,而教育程度越低也會使農家指揮者投保農、漁保以及領取老農津貼機率增加,且南部地區指揮者投保農、漁保以及領取老農津貼之機率也較其他地區高。此外,實證結果指出老農津貼與家庭農業所得、非農業所得並非脫鉤,指揮者領取老農津貼對農業所得與非農業所得皆為顯著負向效果,因此政府在制訂或調整老農津貼政策時,必須同時考慮到其對農家所得之影響,而家中滿十五歲人數、專業農牧戶、總耕地面積與指揮者年齡皆對家庭農業所得有正向效果。另外,農家指揮者領取老農津貼會顯著影響其他家庭成員之農場外勞動力決策,並減少無農場外工作的機會,尤其以農場外服務業工作之效果最為顯著,且對46~55歲家庭成員所造成的排擠效果最大,故政府在調整老農津貼政策時,須考慮到老農津貼所導致的排擠效果,否則將致使農業人力流失與農家繼承問題越趨嚴重。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The Farmer Health Insurance and the Old Farmer Pension Program are the major part of social welfare system for Taiwanese farmers. The goal of social welfare system is to maintain the health and increase the welfare of farmers and to promote the stability of rural areas. However, the social welfare system generates the deterioration of fiscal expenditure, and the old aged agricultural structure has been a serious problem. Therefore, how to maintain the social and economic wellbeing of the aged farmers has become an important policy issue. Recently a great deal of studies about Taiwanese farmers has devoted to the Farmer Health Insurance and the Old Farmer Pension Program. However, little attention has been paid to thoroughly understanding the current allocation of social insurance of Taiwanese farmers, and the effect of Old Farmer Pension Program on the on- and off-farm incomes and off-farm labor decisions of the young generations of the farm households. Thus, the major objective of this article is to provide an empirical assessment on these particular agricultural policy issue.
Using a unique dataset of 7,270 farm households which contains 7,270 principle farm operators and 10,918 young family members (excluding farm operator) aged 19-55 drawn from the Agricultural Household Survey in Taiwan in 2011, we adopt a Multinomial Logit Model, Recursive Mixed-Nonlinear Model, and Mixture Simultaneous Equation System to thoroughly understand the current allocation of social insurance of Taiwanese farmers, and to investigate the extent to which the receipts of the farm operator of the old pension payments on the off-farm labor supply decisions of the young family members aged 19-55 and on the on- and off-farm incomes. Results show that the number of of household members aged 15 or above, professional farm, total land area, and age of operator have positive effects on the likelihood of insuring the Farmer Health Insurance and receiving the old pension. Moreover, the lower education attainment of operator, the higher the likelihood of insuring the Farmer Health Insurance and receiving the old pension. Furthermore, the receipts of the old pension of the elderly farm operator have a significantly negative impact on the on- and off-farm incomes. This indicate that the relationship between Old Farmer Pension Program and the on- and off-farm incomes is not disconnect. In addition, our findings suggest that the receipts of the old pension of the elderly farm operator have a significant impact on young adults' off-farm labor decision. The old farmer pension program significantly pushed young farm family member to the off-farm labor market, and the effect is more pronounced in non-farm service sector. Furthermore, among different age groups, this crowding-out effect is more significant for the family members aged between 46 and 55. This result provides a deep insight of the existing literature regarding the crowding out effect of public pension on other family members. In terms of policy perspective, government should design other programs to help young farm generation on the farm to balance the negative impacts of the Old Farmer Pension Program on farm succession. In conclusion, the government concerned should take the crowding-out effect into account when they adjusted the Old Farmer Pension Program, otherwise the loss of labor resource in agricultural sector and farm succession issues would become a serious problem. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T05:23:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01627001-1.pdf: 2464282 bytes, checksum: 6793a01adc695753ef90432c55df5e94 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 研究方法與步驟 6 第四節 研究流程 7 第二章 政策與文獻回顧 8 第一節 臺灣農民健康保險政策與現況 8 第二節 臺灣與美國社會保險之文獻探討 12 第三節 臺灣老農津貼政策與實施現況 16 第四節 老農津貼與農家經濟行為、生產力之文獻探討 19 第五節 老農津貼與家庭成員之文獻探討 20 第六節 小結 22 第三章 資料介紹 23 第一節 資料背景 23 第二節 資料處理過程 25 第三節 變數選取與處理過程 28 第四節 敘述統計 34 第四章 實證模型與方法 49 第一節 實證模型-Multinomial Logit Model 49 第二節 實證模型-Recursive Mixed-Nonlinear Model 52 第三節 實證模型-Mixture Simultaneous Equation System 54 第五章 實證結果 58 第一節 指揮者社會保險投保身份之實證分析結果 58 第二節 指揮者投保農、漁保與領取老農津貼之實證分析結果 65 第三節 老農津貼與農業所得、非農業所得之實證分析結果 72 第四節 老農津貼與家庭成員於農場外工作型態之實證分析結果 80 第五節 小結 88 第六章 結論 94 第一節 結論與建議 94 第二節 研究限制與未來研究方向 97 參考文獻 98 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 臺灣老年農民福利津貼制度對農家經濟行為之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Impact of Old Farmer Pension Program on Economic Behavior of Farm Households in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳麗光(Likwang Chen),廖培安(Pei-An Liao),王俊豪(Jiun-Hao Wang) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 農業家庭,農場外勞動力供給,農民健康保險,老年農民福利津貼制度,臺灣, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Family Farms,Off-Farm Labor Supply,Farmer Health Insurance,Old Farmer Pension Program,Taiwan, | en |
dc.relation.page | 102 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.41 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。