請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56304完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林裕彬 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Yi Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李欣怡 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T05:22:40Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-08-25 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-25 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour.
Alcamo, J., & Bennett, E. M. (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press. Alessa, L. N., Kliskey, A. A., & Brown, G. (2008). Social–ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social–ecological space. Landscape and urban planning, 85 (1), 27-39. Assessment, M. E. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being (Vol. 5). Island Press Washington, DC. Bengston, D. N., & Xu, Z. (1995). Changing national forest values: A content analysis. Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press. Beverly, J. L., Uto, K., Wilkes, J., & Bothwell, P. (2008). Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: an internet-based participatory mapping approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38 (2), 289-303. Brown, G. (2004). Mapping Spatial Attributes in Survey Research for Natural Resource Management: Methods and Applications. Society & Natural Resources, 18 (1), 17-39. Brown, G. (2006). Mapping landscape values and development preferences: a method for tourism and residential development planning. International Journal of Tourism Research, 8 (2), 101-113. Brown, G. (2008). A theory of urban park geography. Journal of leisure research, 40 (4), 589-607. Brown, G. (2012). Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) for Regional and Environmental Planning: Reflections on a Decade of Empirical Research. Journal of the Urban & Regional Information Systems Association, 24 (2). Brown, G. (2013). The relationship between social values for ecosystem services and global land cover: an empirical analysis. Ecosystem Services, 5, 58-68. Brown, G., & Alessa, L. (2005). A GIS-based inductive study of wilderness values. Fulcrum Publishing. Brown, G., Montag, J. M., & Lyon, K. (2012). Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Society & Natural Resources, 25 (7), 633-651. Brown, G., & Reed, P. (2000). Typology for Use in National Forest Planning. Forest science, 46, 2. Brown, G., Reed, P., & Harris, C. (2002). Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: an Alaska case study. Applied Geography, 22 (1), 49-76. Brown, G., Smith, C., Alessa, L., & Kliskey, A. (2004). A comparison of perceptions of biological value with scientific assessment of biological importance. Applied Geography, 24 (2), 161-180. Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2011). Public Participation GIS: A new method for national park planning. Landscape and urban planning, 102 (1), 1-15. Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2013). A place-based approach to conservation management using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56 (4), 455-473. Brown, G. G., & Reed, P. (2009). Public participation GIS: a new method for use in national forest planning. Forest science, 55 (2), 166-182. Bryan, B. A., Raymond, C. M., Crossman, N. D., & Macdonald, D. H. (2010). Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how? Landscape and urban planning, 97 (2), 111-122. Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R. S., Diaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., & Pereira, H. M. (2009). Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (5), 1305-1312. Chan, K., Satterfield, T., & Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8-18. Clement, J. M. (2006). Spatially explicit values on the Pike and San Isabel National Forests in Colorado:Fort Collins, Colorado State University, Ph.D. dissertation, ProQuest/UMI, AAT3246268. In. Colorado State University. Clement, J. M., & Cheng, A. S. (2011). Using analyses of public value orientations, attitudes and preferences to inform national forest planning in Colorado and Wyoming. Applied Geography, 31 (2), 393-400. Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T., & Bonney, R. (2007). Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology & Society, 12 (2). Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., & Paruelo, J. (1998). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 25 (1), 3-15. Daily, G. (1997). Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press. De Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41 (3), 393-408. De Lange, W., Wise, R., Forsyth, G., & Nahman, A. (2010). Integrating socio-economic and biophysical data to support water allocations within river basins: An example from the Inkomati Water Management Area in South Africa. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25 (1), 43-50. Dickinson, J. L., Zuckerberg, B., & Bonter, D. N. (2010). Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 41, 149-172. Diversity, C. o. B. (2008). Decision adopted by the conference of the parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its ninth meeting. IX/7: Ecosystem approach. In. Ekins, P., Simon, S., Deutsch, L., Folke, C., & De Groot, R. (2003). A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecological Economics, 44 (2), 165-185. Elith, J., Phillips, S. J., Hastie, T., Dudik, M., Chee, Y. E., & Yates, C. J. (2011). A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions, 17 (1), 43-57. Fagerholm, N., Kayhko, N., Ndumbaro, F., & Khamis, M. (2012). Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments – Mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators, 18, 421-433. Geneletti, D. (2013). Assessing the impact of alternative land-use zoning policies on future ecosystem services. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 40, 25-35. Goodchild, M. F. (2007). in the World of Web 2.0. International Journal, 2, 24-32. Guptill, S. C., Morrison, J. L., & Association, I. C. (1995). Elements of spatial data quality. Hacklay, M. (2008). How good is volunteered geographical information? a comparative study of OpenStreetMap and rdnace Survey datasets. In: Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design In, www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucfamha/OSM%20data%20analysis%20070808_web.pdf. Hacklay, M. (2009a). OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Meridian 2— progress maps. In PoVeSham personal blog (Vol. 02.01.10), povesham.wordpress.com. Hacklay, M. (2009b). The digital divide of OpenStreetMap. In (Vol. 02.01.10), povesham.wordpress.com. Hein, L., Van Koppen, K., De Groot, R. S., & Van Ierland, E. C. (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57 (2), 209-228. Heipke, C. (2010). Crowdsourcing geospatial data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65 (6), 550-557. Helliwell, D. (1969). Valuation of wildlife resources. Regional Studies, 3 (1), 41-47. Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired magazine, 14 (6), 1-4. Jetz, W. (2012). Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. Trends Ecol Evol, 27 (3), 151-159. Joos, G. (2000). Zur Qualitat von objektstrukturierten Geodaten. Univ. der Bundeswehr Munchen, Fak. fur Bauingenieur-und Vermessungswesen, Studiengang Geodasie und Geoinformationen. Jordan, R., Singer, F., Vaughan, J., & Berkowitz, A. (2009). What should every citizen know about ecology? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7 (9), 495-500. Kaartinen, R., Hardwick, B., & Roslin, T. (2013). Using citizen scientists to measure an ecosystem service nationwide. Ecology, 94 (11), 2645-2652. Kounadi, O. (2009). Assessing the quality of OpenStreetMap data. Unpublished Master, University College London, homepages.ge.ucl.ac.uk/~mhaklay/pdf/Rania_OSM_dissertation.pdf. Kumar, M., & Kumar, P. (2008). Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics, 64 (4), 808-819. Leymann, F., & Fritsch, D. (2009). Cloud computing: The next revolution in IT. Proceedings of the 52th Photogrammetric Week, 3-12. Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Alberti, M., Redman, C. L., Schneider, S. H., Ostrom, E., Pell, A. N., & Lubchenco, J. (2007). Coupled human and natural systems. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36 (8), 639-649. Maue, P., & Schade, S. (2008). Quality of geographic information patchworks. In Proceedings of AGILE (pp. 1-8). Nelson, G. C., Bennett, E., Berhe, A. A., Cassman, K., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Dobermann, A., Dobson, A., Janetos, A., & Levy, M. (2006). Anthropogenic drivers of ecosystem change: an overview. Ecology & Society, 11 (2). Newman, G., Zimmerman, D., Crall, A., Laituri, M., Graham, J., & Stapel, L. (2010). User-friendly web mapping: lessons from a citizen science website. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (12), 1851-1869. Odum, E. P., & Odum, H. T. (1972). Natural areas as necessary components of man's total environment. In Trans North Am Wildl Nat Res Conf. Ostrom, E. (2007). A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of. In Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B (Vol. 274, pp. 1931). Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., & Platais, G. (2005). Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World development, 33 (2), 237-253. Pfueller, S. L., Xuan, Z., Whitelaw, P., & Winter, C. (2009). Spatial mapping of community values for tourism planning and conservation in the Murray River Reserves, Victoria, Australia. Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism. Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., & Schapire, R. E. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological modelling, 190 (3), 231-259. Phillips, S. J., & Dudik, M. (2008). Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography, 31 (2), 161-175. Phillips, S. J., Dudik, M., & Schapire, R. E. (2004). A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. In Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning (pp. 83). ACM. Potschin, M., & Haines-Young, R. (2013). Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landscape ecology, 28 (6), 1053-1065. Raymond, C., & Brown, G. (2007). A spatial method for assessing resident and visitor attitudes towards tourism growth and development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15 (5), 520-540. Raymond, C. M., Bryan, B. A., MacDonald, D. H., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A., & Kalivas, T. (2009). Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 68 (5), 1301-1315. Raymond, E. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 12 (3), 23-49. Reed, P., & Brown, G. (2003). Values suitability analysis: A methodology for identifying and integrating public perceptions of ecosystem values in forest planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46 (5), 643-658. Roberts, J. K., & Henson, R. K. (2001). A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of a New Measure of Teacher Efficacy: Ohio State Teacher Efficacy Scale. Rolston, H. (1989). Philosophy gone wild (Vol. 185). Cambridge Univ Press. Rolston, H., & Coufal, J. (1991). A forest ethic and multivalue forest management. Journal of forestry, 89 (4), 35-40. Sarda-Palomera, F., & Vieites, D. R. (2011). Modelling species' climatic distributions under habitat constraints: a case study with Coturnix coturnix. In Annales Zoologici Fennici (Vol. 48, pp. 147-160). BioOne. Schlossberg, M., & Shuford, E. (2005). Delineating' public' and' participation' in PPGIS. Seppelt, R., Dormann, C. F., Eppink, F. V., Lautenbach, S., & Schmidt, S. (2011). A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48 (3), 630-636. Sherrouse, B. C., Clement, J. M., & Semmens, D. J. (2011). A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography, 31 (2), 748-760. Sherrouse, B. C., Semmens, D. J., & Clement, J. M. (2014). An application of Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecological Indicators, 36, 68-79. Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis (Vol. 26). CRC press. Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol, 24 (9), 467-471. Sim, J., & Wright, C. C. (2005). The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical therapy, 85 (3), 257-268. Troy, A., & Wilson, M. A. (2006). Mapping ecosystem services: practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecological Economics, 60 (2), 435-449. Turner, A. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. ' O'Reilly Media, Inc.'. Tyrvainen, L., Makinen, K., & Schipperijn, J. (2007). Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and urban planning, 79 (1), 5-19. van Riper, C. J., Kyle, G. T., Sutton, S. G., Barnes, M., & Sherrouse, B. C. (2012). Mapping outdoor recreationists' perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia. Applied Geography, 35 (1), 164-173. Walker1a, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies1b, J., Abel1b, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., Lebel, L., Norberg, J., Peterson, G. D., & Pritchard, R. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6 (1), 14. Zhu, X., Pfueller, S., Whitelaw, P., & Winter, C. (2010). Spatial differentiation of landscape values in the Murray River Region of Victoria, Australia. Environmental management, 45 (5), 896-911. Zube, E. H. (1987). Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landscape ecology, 1 (1), 37-45. 王承龍. (2010). 應用克利金與逐步模擬分析魚類喜好流況之時空變異-以大屯溪日本禿頭鯊為例. 臺灣大學. 汪靜明, 臺灣師範大學, & 環境保護中心. (2003). 大屯溪生態工法教育硏討會論文集: 2003 年全國生態工法展覽會. 臺灣師範大學環境保護中心. 林書楷. (2013). PPGIS促進溝通之成效-美濃國家自然公園案例分析. 臺灣大學. 梁文盛. (2004). 本土化水域生態工法工程技術之研究 (Vol. 3). 蔡博文. (2008). Use of PPGIS for Indigenous Mapping: An Assessment of Data and Function Needs. 臺灣地理資訊學刊 (6), 49-61. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56304 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 人類行為及活動往往造成土地顯著且快速的變遷，進而影響土地及資源之價值，因此，在評估生態統服務價值時，必須將人類社會活動與環境之相互關係及生物物理整合性資訊納入考量。社會價值近年來被許多研究認為能代表人與環境之關聯性，因此將其與生態系統整合為社會生態系統(social-ecological systems)，而社會價值研究發展出的地方性取向(place-based)量化方法現今也被許多研究視為生態系統文化服務之量化方法。生態系統服務之社會價值模式(Social Values for Ecosystem Services, SolVES)為一新興之社會價值量化模式，其特點為結合地方性取向量化方法之資料以及自然環境因子，綜合評估一地之社會價值分佈。
本研究以大屯溪流域為例，使用公共參與地理資訊系統(Public Participation Geographic Information System, PPGIS)以及群眾資源(Crowdsourcing)方式收集資料，並使用SolVES模式探討12項社會價值在大屯溪流域之分佈情形以及不同社會經濟背景之受訪者對於社會價值之觀感，最後以一致性分析探討公共參與地理資訊系統及群眾資源資料收集方式對社會價值結果之影響。 本研究結果為國內首次以地方性取向量化方法模擬社會價值分佈，研究結果發現，由於受訪者提供之社會價值出現點位皆在大屯溪沿岸周圍，因此社會價值多聚集在大屯溪沿岸附近，並且與到河流的距離之環境因子有非常密切的關係。不同背景之受訪者族群根據其生活需求、工作經驗以及教育訓練，其重視的社會價值以及社會價值分佈之位置和標記數量會有所不同，進而影響其社會價值模擬結果之面積。此外，本研究結果發現，透過詳盡的研究區域以及社會價值介紹，非當地居民也可以產出與當地居民意見相似的社會價值結果，但需要長久生活經驗才能了解的歷史價值，則仍需要到當地訪談，才能呈現較貼近當地實際情形之結果。 關鍵字:社會價值、生態系統服務、公共參與地理資訊系統、群眾資源、公民科學、生態系統服務之社會價值模式(SolVES)、自願性地理資訊 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | An ecosystem provides tangible and intangible benefits to humans; however, as human activities constantly cause enormous and rapid change of environment, it is essential to include information resulting from both social and biophysical assessments when we evaluate ecosystem services. Social values, representing the link between humans and the environment, are integrated into the ecosystem and quantified by a placed-based method which refers to the valuation methodology of ecosystem services in current studies. Social values for ecosystem services model (SolVES) is developed in response to the need for incorporating quantified and spatially explicit measures of social values into ecosystem services assessments.
The study took Da-Tun brook as a case study. Using the data collected via the ways of public participation geographic information system (PPGIS) and crowdsourcing, the SolVES model was applied to calculate social value index in the area of Da-Tun brook. The results of the study describe the spatial distribution of social values in the study area and the comparisons of results among respondent groups from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Also, the study used kappa efficient to demonstrate the differences between PPGIS and crowdsourcing results. Key findings indicate that: (1) social values assemble near Da-Tun river due to the reason that the places marked by respondents are also near Da-Tun river. Moreover, this result shows that social values in Da-Tun brook are highly relative to the distance to the river, (2) people from different socioeconomic backgrounds reveal different social values results, also, different respondent groups show different preferences towards social values, (3) with a thorough introduction of study area and social values, PPGIS social values results are similar to those from crowdsourcing; however, historic results show larger difference between PPGIS and crowd sourcing results due to the fact that long living experience is necessary for mapping historic value in an area. Key words: social values, ecosystem services, PPGIS, crowd sourcing, citizen science, Social Values for ecosystem services (SolVES), Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T05:22:40Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01622011-1.pdf: 9367716 bytes, checksum: 9b3fb081e2061d70f46d264c79ba3399 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 I
中文摘要 III Abstract IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 VIII 表目錄 IX 第一章 緒論 1 1-1 研究源起 1 1-2 研究目的 3 1-3 研究流程圖 4 第二章 文獻回顧 7 2-1 生態系統服務 7 2-1-1 社會價值之定義 10 2-1-2 社會價值評估與模擬 12 2-1-3 生態系統服務之社會價值模式(SolVES) 14 2-2 公共參與地理資訊系統 15 2-2-1公共參與地理資訊系統之定義 15 2-2-2公共參與地理資訊系統之應用 16 2-3 群眾資源 20 2-3-1 群眾資源之定義 20 2-3-2 群眾資源於資料收集之技術、來源及資料品質 21 2-3-3 群眾資源之應用 22 2-4 公共參與地理資訊系統與群眾資源之比較 26 第三章 理論與方法 28 3-1 研究區域 28 3-1-1大屯溪流域生態系統 29 3-1-2大屯溪人文生態系統 31 3-2 問卷設計方式與資料搜集 35 3-2-1 問卷設計 35 3-2-2 問卷收集方式 39 3-2-3受訪者族群分類方式及問卷篩選方式 41 3-3 生態系統服務之社會價值模式(Social Values for Ecosystem Services, SolVES) 43 3-3-1 生態系統服務價值模式 48 3-3-2價值測繪模式 49 3-3-3 Maxent模式 50 第四章 結果與討論 52 4-1 受訪者人口調查資料 52 4-1-1 受訪者基本資料 52 4-1-2 問卷信度分析 56 4-2 社會價值點位之空間分佈 58 4-2-1 全體受訪者社會價值結果分析與討論 59 4-2-2 受訪者族群社會價值結果之分析與比較 74 4-2-3 公共參與及群眾資源結果分析與討論 86 4-3 社會價值與環境變數之關係 91 4-3-1 社會價值與環境變數關係 91 4-3-2 生態系統服務之社會價值模式率定及驗證 93 第五章 結論與建議 95 5-1 結論 95 5-2 建議 98 參考文獻 100 附錄一 訪談紙本版問卷 107 附錄二 網路版問卷 121 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 生態系統服務 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會價值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自願性地理資訊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公共參與地理資訊系統 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 群眾資源 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公民科學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生態系統服務之社會價值模式(SolVES) | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | PPGIS | en |
| dc.subject | Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) | en |
| dc.subject | Social Values for ecosystem services (SolVES) | en |
| dc.subject | citizen science | en |
| dc.subject | crowd sourcing | en |
| dc.subject | ecosystem services | en |
| dc.subject | social values | en |
| dc.title | 透過公共參與及群眾資源進行生態系統服務社會價值模擬──以大屯溪流域為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Using PPGIS and crowdsourcing for mapping social values for ecosystem services: The case study of Datuan basin | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 彭立沛,童慶斌,李明旭 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 社會價值,生態系統服務,公共參與地理資訊系統,群眾資源,公民科學,生態系統服務之社會價值模式(SolVES),自願性地理資訊, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | social values,ecosystem services,PPGIS,crowd sourcing,citizen science,Social Values for ecosystem services (SolVES),Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI), | en |
| dc.relation.page | 122 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-15 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物環境系統工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-103-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 9.15 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。