請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56139完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張國鎮(Kuo-Chun Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wei-Chung Cheng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 鄭維中 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T05:16:39Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-08-04 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2020-08-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2020-07-29 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1].Applied Technology Council, 1996, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Report ATC-40, Redwood City. [2].Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 1997. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Report FEMA 273, Washington, DC. [3].Krwainkler, H. 1995. New Trends in Seismic Design Methodology. Proc. 10th Eur. Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, 821-830. [4].Bertero, V. V. 1995. Tri-service manual methods, in Vision 2000, Part 2, Appendix J, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento. [5].Reinhorn, A. M. 1997. Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations, Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Code (Krawinkler and Fajfar, eds), Balkema, Rotterdam, 277-287. [6].Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K. 1999. Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum, Earthquake Spectra, 15(4), 637-656. [7].Fajfar, P. 1999. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28, 979-993. [8].Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2006. Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1-Bridges, FHWA-HRT-06-032, McLean, VA. [9].American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2011. Guide Specification for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, LRFDSEIS-2, Washington, DC. [10].California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2013. Seismic Design Criteria (SDC), Version 1.7, Sacramento, CA. [11].California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2016. Seismic Design Specifications for Steel Bridges, Second Version, Sacramento, CA. [12].The European Standard (British Standard), 2005. Eurocode 8- Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 2: Bridges, EN 1998-2:2005. [13].Wang, P. H. 2017. A New Smooth Hysteretic Model and Capacity-Based Displacement Spectrum for Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns, Ph.D. Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taiwan. [14].Park, Y. J. and Ang, A. H. S. 1985. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), 111(4), 722–739. [15].Wang, P. H., Chang, K. C. and Ou, Y. C. 2019. Capacity-based inelastic displacement spectra for reinforced concrete bridge columns. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.3212. [16].Mahin, S. A. and Bertero, V. V. 1976. Problems in establishing and predicting ductility in seismic design. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Earthquake Structural Engineering, St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.A. [17].Takeda, T., Soxen, M. A. and Nielson N. N. 1970. Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquake. ASCE Journal of the Structural Division; 96:2557-2573. [18].Clough, R. W. 1966. Effect of stiffness degradation on earthquake ductility requirements. Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics, Report No. SESM 66-16, Department of CE, University of California, Berkeley. [19].Mahin, S. A. and Bertero, V. V. 1975. An evaluation of some methods for predicting seimic behavior of reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. EERC 75-5, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley. [20].Park, Y. J., Reinhorn, A. M. and Kunnath, S. K. 1987. IDARC: inelastic damage analysis of reinforced concrete frame, shear-wall, structures. Technical Report NCREE-87-0008, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY. [21].Ibarra, L. F., Medina, R. A. and Krawinkler, H. 2005. Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics; 34:1489-1511. [22].Rahnama, M. and Krawinkler, H. 1993. Effects of soft soil and hysteresis model on seismic deamnds. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Report No. 108. Department of CEE, Stanford University. [23].Bouc, R. 1967. Forced vibration of mechanical systems with hysteresis. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Nonlinear Oscillation, Prague, Czechoslovakia. [24].Wen, Y. K. 1976. Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems. ASCE Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division; 102:249-263. [25].Baber, T. T. and Wen Y. K. 1981. Random vibration of hysteretic degrading systems. ASCE Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division; 107:1069-1087. [26].Baber, T. T. and Noori M. N. 1985. Random vibration of degrading pinching systems. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics; 111:1010-1026. [27].Baber, T. T. and Noori M. N. 1986. Modeling general hysteresis behavior and random vibration application. ASME Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress and Reliability in Design; 108:411-420. [28].Chung, S. T. and Loh, C. H. 2002. Identification and verification of seismic demand from different hysteretic models. Journal of Earthquake Engineering; 6:331-355. [29].Ou, Y. C., Song, J., Wang, P. H., Adidharma, L., Chang, K. C. and Lee, G. C. 2014. Ground motionduration effects on hysteretic behavior of reinforcement concrete bridge columns. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering; 140(3), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000856. [30].Foliente, G. C. 1998. Hysteresis modeling of wood joints and structural systems. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics; 121:1013-1022. [31].Lehman, D. E. and Moehle, J. P. 2000. Seismic performance of well-confined concrete bridge columns. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No.PEER 1998/01, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley. [32].ATC. 1996. Applied Technology Council. Improved Seismic Design Criteria for California Bridges: Provisional Recommendations. Report ATC-32. [33].Caltrans 1991. Bridge Design Specifications Manual. California Department of Transportation. [34].內政部, 混凝土結構設計規範, 2011. [35].交通部, 公路橋梁設計規範, 2009. [36].交通部, 公路橋樑耐震設計規範, 2009. [37].Paulay, T. and Priestley, M. J. N., 1992. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Building. John Wiley and Sons, New York. [38].Park, R. and Priestley, M. J. N., 1987. Strength and Ductility of Concrete Bridge Columns Under Seismic Loading. ACI Structural Journal, 84(1), 61-76. [39].Mander, J. B., Priestley, J. N., Park, R., 1988. Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete. American Society of Civil Engineers, 114(8), 1804-1826. [40].Dhakal, R. P. and Maekawa, K., 2002. Path dependent cyclic stress-strain relationship of reinforcing bar including buckling. Eng. Struct., 24(11), 1383-1396. [41].Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2000. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Report FEMA 356, Washington, DC. [42].交通部, 公路橋樑耐震設計規範, 2019. [43].Adidharma, L. 2012. Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns under Long Duration Ground Motions, Master Thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology,Taiwan Tech. [44].Sakai, J. and Kawashima, K. 2006. Unloading and reloading stress-strain model for confined concrete. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering;132:112-122. [45].Hoehler, M. S. and Stanton, J. F. 2006. Simple phenomenological model for reinforcing steel under arbitrary load. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering;132:1061-1069. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/56139 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 現行各國橋梁耐震評估方法大多使用較為簡便之位移係數法,但早期位移係數皆使用多段線性遲滯模型進行非線性動力歷時分析統計而得,該多段線性遲滯模型不符合實際鋼筋混凝土橋柱之平滑遲滯行為,且使用者無法確切得知在評估位移下橋柱之損傷狀態,為此,前人提出一種創新的耐震評估方法:容量位移雙反應譜法。透過一個能夠良好模擬橋柱勁度折減、強度衰減、束縮效應以及路徑相依特性的新平滑遲滯模型,考量不同橋柱設計參數與震源特性來對一系列單自由度系統進行非線性動力歷時分析,建立能夠同時評估位移和損傷指標之容量位移雙反應譜。 經實驗證明,損傷指標除了可用來準確地預測結構強度衰減的時機,更可做為評估橋柱在受不同位移加載歷程下之實際破壞狀態的良好指標。故容量位移雙反應譜可充份掌握橋梁結構之耐震能力,並讓使用者可以更明確、直覺且可視地瞭解橋柱之耐震性能。 為了使容量位移雙反應譜法的應用更加廣泛,需要更多能夠涵蓋實務設計的橋柱試驗結果與破壞照片。現有文獻中較為缺乏完整探討矩形RC橋柱設計參數影響之相關試驗結果與破壞照片。因此,本研究遵照現行台灣橋梁耐震設計規範,並參考前人所規劃之圓形斷面RC橋柱試驗,設計五座涵蓋不同縱向鋼筋比與高寬比之矩形RC橋柱試體進行反覆加載試驗。 針對橋柱試驗結果,除了基本之理論斷面分析、試體破壞觀察、曲率和剪應變分布分析以及應變計資料分析之外,本研究特別利用新平滑遲滯模型中,能夠描述結構特性之具有物理意義的模型參數來對每一座矩形RC橋柱進行參數識別,並探討縱向鋼筋比與高寬比對撓曲破壞控制之矩形RC橋柱在勁度折減、強度衰減、束縮效應與損傷指數上的差異。同時,與前人對圓形RC橋柱之參數識別結果互相比較。最終,將參數識別與損傷指標分析結果建立為容量位移雙反應譜資料庫,使容量位移雙反應譜能夠更加廣泛的應用在不同設計參數的橋梁耐震評估方面。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Current seismic design and evaluation of bridges tends towards the well-known displacement coefficient method. Early displacement coefficients were statistically obtained through nonlinear time history analysis using polygonal hysteretic models. The displacement coefficient allows maximum inelastic displacement to be estimated from its maximum elastic displacement. Though it seems simple and convenience, most of the displacement coefficient method cannot necessary fit the test, as we know the real hysteresis behaviors of reinforced concrete bridge columns should be smooth rather than piecewise linear with abrupt stiffness changes. Also, the user couldn’t know the actual damage condition about the column under calculated displacement. For refining these shortcomings of displacement coefficient method, previous research proposed an innovative seismic evaluation method for reinforced concrete bridges called the Capacity-based inelastic displacement spectra. The inelastic displacement spectra associated with corresponding damage index for RC bridge columns were constructed through a series of nonlinear time history analysis of SDOF system using a smooth hysteresis model that can realistically simulate the seismic behaviors of reinforced concrete bridge columns including stiffness degradation, strength deterioration, pinching effect and path dependence with the effects of various design parameters and earthquake types In addition, it was demonstrated that the damage index can be used to accurately predict the onset of strength deterioration and also can be a good indicator for assessing the actual visible damage conditions of RC bridge column regardless of its loading history. Therefore, seismic analysis via this capacity-based inelastic displacement spectra can obtain not only the maximum responses of a column but also its damage condition under a given ground motion, providing a better insight into its seismic performance. In order to make the application of capacity-based inelastic displacement spectra more extensive, bridge column test results and failure photos that can cover practical design are needed. Therefore, this study designed five rectangular RC bridge columns for cyclic loading tests covering different longitudinal steel ratio and aspect ratio complied with current Taiwan seismic design codes and circular RC bridge columns test designed in previous research. For each of the tested columns, in addition to the basic cross-sectional analysis, failure observation, displacement distribution and strain gauge analysis, this study specifically identified the smooth hysteresis model parameters capable of representing different deterioration characteristic of structure properties. Furthermore, the cause of difference between the identified model parameters from variable design parameters of RC bridge columns were also discuss theoretically in this study. Finally, the database of capacity-based inelastic displacement spectra were constructed for each tested bridge columns in this study with their model identification results and corresponding damage state. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T05:16:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2707202021270700.pdf: 28897964 bytes, checksum: fa47cc5a7ce7e3aba175370f53609e7e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2020 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I 誌謝 III 摘要 V ABSTRACT VII 目錄 IX 表目錄 XIII 圖目錄 XV 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究背景與動機 1 1.2研究目的 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2.1多邊形遲滯模型 6 2.2平滑遲滯模型 8 2.3新平滑遲滯模型(SHM) 11 2.4實驗回顧 17 2.3.1 Dawn E. Lehman[31] 18 2.5設計規範介紹 25 2.4.1 混凝土結構設計規範(內政部, 2011)[34] 25 2.4.2 公路橋梁設計規範(交通部, 2009)[35] 26 2.4.3 公路橋梁耐震設計規範(交通部,2009)[36] 27 第三章 試體規劃 30 3.1試驗目的 30 3.2試驗設計及規劃 31 3.2.1 試驗表格及設計參數 31 3.3試體製作 39 3.3.1 材料準備 39 3.3.2 鋼筋加工及綁紮 40 3.3.3 應變計黏貼 43 3.3.4 試體澆置 46 3.4試驗配置 49 3.4.1 固定系統 49 3.4.2 施力系統 49 3.4.3 現場佈置 50 3.5量測系統 53 3.5.1 內部量測系統 53 3.5.2 外部量測系統 56 3.6參數推定 59 3.7測試流程 68 第四章 試驗結果與分析 70 4.1材料試驗結果 70 4.1.1 鋼筋抗拉試驗 70 4.1.2 混凝土坍度試驗及混凝土抗壓試驗 75 4.2理論斷面分析 77 4.3試驗觀察與記錄 80 4.3.1 試體C315 80 4.3.2 試體C307 81 4.3.3 試體C330 83 4.3.4 試體C615 85 4.3.5 試體C1015 86 4.4遲滯迴圈 98 4.5等效阻尼比 103 4.6位移韌性比 107 4.7曲率、剪應變及滑移 116 4.7.1 曲率 116 4.7.2 剪應變 122 4.7.3 滑移 126 4.7.4 位移分布 127 4.8塑性鉸長度 129 4.9應變計量測 130 4.9.1 縱向鋼筋之應變 130 4.9.2 橫向鋼筋之應 140 4.10小結 147 第五章 新平滑遲滯模型之參數試別 148 5.1縱向鋼筋比對遲滯衰減行為之影響 148 5.2高寬比對遲滯衰減行為之影響 152 5.3小結 157 第六章 損傷指數與相應之橋柱破壞情況 168 第七章 結論與建議 178 7.1結論與建議 178 7.2未來研究展望 180 參考文獻 182 附錄A 各試體位移歷程表 187 附錄B 各試體之破壞照 191 附錄C 損傷指標DI與相應之橋柱破壞照片 221 附錄D 各試體之應變計 244 附錄E 試體裂縫分布圖 247 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 矩形鋼筋混凝土橋柱 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 縱向鋼筋比 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高寬比 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 容量位移雙反應譜 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 新平滑遲滯模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 參數識別 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 損傷指數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | model verification | en |
| dc.subject | rectangular reinforced concrete bridge column | en |
| dc.subject | longitudinal reinforcement ratio | en |
| dc.subject | aspect ratio | en |
| dc.subject | capacity-based inelastic displacement spectra | en |
| dc.subject | smooth hysteretic model | en |
| dc.subject | damage index | en |
| dc.title | 縱向鋼筋比與高寬比對矩形RC橋柱遲滯衰減行為之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Effects of Longitudinal Reinforcement Ratio and Aspect Ratio on the Hysteresis deterioration of Rectangular RC bridge columns | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 108-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃世建(Shyh-Jiann Hwang),歐昱辰(Yu-Chen Ou),鄭敏元(Min-Yuan Cheng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 矩形鋼筋混凝土橋柱,縱向鋼筋比,高寬比,容量位移雙反應譜,新平滑遲滯模型,參數識別,損傷指數, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | rectangular reinforced concrete bridge column,longitudinal reinforcement ratio,aspect ratio,capacity-based inelastic displacement spectra,smooth hysteretic model,model verification,damage index, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 251 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202001935 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2020-07-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2707202021270700.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 28.22 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
