請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55946
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 周楚洋(Chu-Yang Chou) | |
dc.contributor.author | Rong-Yi Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林容伊 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T05:11:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-08-25 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2014-08-25 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2014-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中央氣象局全球資訊網。2013。http://www.cwb.gov.tw/V7/index.htm 。上網日期:2013.9.2。
行政院環保署。2013。http://wq.epa.gov.tw/WQEPA/Code/Business/Vocabulary.aspx上網日期:2013.4.10。 陳國誠。1991。廢水生物處理學。台北:茂昌圖書有限公司。 洪仁陽。厭氧程序處理工業廢水及都市汙水之設計。1998。初版。臺北: 國立編譯館。 臺北市政府工務局衛生下水道工程處。2013。臺北市污水下水道建設現況。http://www.sso.taipei.gov.tw/。上網日期: 2013.3.18。 劉安琪。1996。應用固定化細胞技術處理豬糞尿廢水。碩士論文。台北:台灣大學生物產業機電工程系研究所。 APHA, AWWA and WEF, 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th edition. Aiyuk, S., I. Forrez, D. K. Lieven , A. Van Haandel and W. Verstraete. 2006. Anaerobic and complementary treatment of domestic sewage in regions with hot climates—A review. Bioresource Technology 97 (2006): 2225–2241 Bandara, W.M.K.R.T.W., K. Tomonori , S. Hisashi, S. Manabu , N. Yoshihito , T. Masahiro, and O. Satoshi, 2012. Anaerobic treatment of municipal wastewater at ambient temperature: Analysis of archaeal community structure and recovery of dissolved methane. Water research(46) : 5756-5764. Cakir, F.Y., M.K. Stenstrom. 2005. Greenhouse gas production: A comparison between aerobic and anaerobic wastewater treatment technology. Water Research 39 : 4197–4203. Cassidy, M.B., H. Lee, and J.T. Trevors, 1996. Environmental applications of immobilized microbial cells: a review. Journal of Industrial Microbiology (16) : 79-101. Charles, D. S., 1987. Immobilized cells: a review of recent literature. Enzyme Microb Technol (9):66-72. Feng, H., L. Hu, Q. Mahmood, C. Qiu, C. Fang, D. Shen. 2008. Anaerobic domestic wastewater treatment with bamboo carrier anaerobic baffled reactor. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation (62) 232–238. Gao, Da-wen, R. An, Y. Tao, J. Li, X. X. Li, and N.Q. Ren. Simultaneous methane production and wastewater reuse by a membrane-based process: Evaluation with raw domestic wastewater. 2011. Journal of Hazardous Materials(186): 383-389. George, S., H. Daphne, L. Patricio, N. Carlos, and B. Angeles . 2012. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal (198-199) : 138-148. Gujer W., A. J. B. Zehnder. 1983. Conversion Processes in Anaerobic Digestion. Water science & technology(15): 127-167 Hale, O., R. Kaan Dereli, M. Evren Ersahin, C. Kinac, H. Spanjers, and J. B. van Lier, 2013. A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment: Integration options, limitations and expectations. Separation and Purification Technology (118): 89–104. Huang, Z., S. L. Ong, and H. Y. Ng. 2013. Performance of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor at different SRTs for domestic wastewater treatment. Journal of Biotechnology (164): 82–90. Kassab G., M. Halalsheh, A. Klapwijk, M. Fayyad, and J.B. van Lier. 2010. Sequential anaerobic–aerobic treatment for domestic wastewater – A review. Bioresource Technology (101): 3299–3310. Kourkoutas, Y., A. Bekatorou, I.M. Banat, R. Marchant, and A.A. Koutinas. 2004. Immobilization technologies and support materials suitable in alcohol beverages production: a review. Food Microbiology (21): 377–397 Latif, M. A., R. Ghufran, Z. A. Wahid, and A. Ahmad. 2011. Integrated application of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor for the treatment of wastewaters. Water research (45) : 4683-4699 Lise, A., J. Lauwersa, J. Degrevea, L. Helsenb, B. Lievensc, K. Willemsc,J. Van Impea, and R. Dewila. 2011. Anaerobic digestion in global bio-energy production: Potential and research challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 : 4295–4301. Liu, A.C. and C.Y. Chou. 2010. Applying the immobilized cells in anaerobic digestion of swine wastewater. Agricultural Machinery 19(2): 33-46. McCarty, P. L., 1964. Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals, Part One: chemistry and microbiology. Public Works 95 (9): 107-112. McCarty, P. L., D.P. Smith, 1986. Anaerobic wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20 (12) :1200–1206. McCarty, P.L., J. Bae , and J. Kim, 2011. Domestic Wastewater Treatment as a Net Energy Producer-Can This be Achieved? Environmental Science and Technology 45 (17), 7100–7106. Melidis, P., V. Eleni, A. Evagelia, and A. Alexander. Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater using an anaerobic fixed-bed loop reactor. 2009. Desalination (248): 716–722. Nemat, M., C. Webb. 2011. Immobilized Cell Bioreactors. Engineering Fundamentals of Biotechnology(2): 331-346. Smith, A. L., S. J. Skerlos, L. Raskin. Psychrophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater. 2013. water research (47) :1655-1665. Yang P.Y., T. Ma, T. S. See and N. Nitisoravut. 1994. Applying entrapped mixed microbial cell techniques for biological wastewater treatment. Water Science & Technology 29 (10-11): 487-495. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55946 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 固定化細胞係將微生物侷限於一特定的空間或特殊的材質之中,在操作反應槽時可避免菌種的流失。本研究以厭氧消化結合固定化細胞技術處理低濃度的廢水並生產甲烷。開始時以人工廢水為基質進行試驗,採漸進的方式逐步減小水力停留時間(HRT),最後再以都市廢水測試厭氧處理的可行性。本研究的菌種為養豬場的厭氧污泥,製成包埋式(Entrapped)固定化細胞後,以100%的填充率(Packing ratio)置入槽中,反應槽的有效工作體積(Working volume)為3 L,操作溫度為37±1 °C。反應槽起動時,HRT為10天,進流的人工廢水濃度為475 mg COD/L。當反應槽穩定之後,HRT漸減為5天、3天、1.56天、1天、12小時及6小時,進流濃度則維持不變。在此試驗期間,於HRT 6小時、有機負荷(OLR) 1.9 g COD/L/d時有最大的甲烷產率0.357 L CH4/L/d,甲烷成分亦達約80%。然後再將HRT和進流人工廢水濃度分別減半為3小時,及接近都市廢水的237 mg COD/L,即維持有機負荷與HRT 6小時相同的條件進行測試,結果顯示COD去除率差異不大,甲烷成分則降至60%,甲烷產率(MPR)也大幅下降至0.121 L CH4/L/d。可知進流基質的有機物濃度過低時,較不利於沼氣生產。最後再以取自台北市內湖汙水處理廠之原廢水以HRT 3小時進行測試,試驗結果顯示出流水質可達放流水標準,穩態時平均COD去除率、GPR、MPR及甲烷成分則分別為87.5%、0.31 L/L/d、0.198 L CH4/L/d及63.67%,證實應用厭氧固定化細胞處理都市廢水並生產甲烷確實可行。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Immobilized-cell is a technique which the microbial cells are confined within a limited space, so that active cells will not be washed out during operation of the reactors. In this study, anaerobic digestion was integrated with immobilized cells for the treatment of low concentration wastewater and methane production. In the beginning, the artificial wastewater was used as substrate and several tests were conducted by gradually decreasing the hydraulic retention time (HRT). At last, the domestic wastewater was used as substrate to evaluate its feasibility for anaerobic treatment. The innoculum of this study was the anaerobic sludge of a pig farm. After fabrication of the entrapped-type immobilized cells, they were placed in a reactor with 100% packing ratio. The reactor had an active volume of 3 L, and was operated at 37±1 °C. To start up, the reactor was operated at an HRT of 10 days and fed with the artificial wastewater with a concentration of 475 mg COD/L. After reaching the steady state, tests of different HRT of 5, 3, 1.56, 1, 0.5 (12 hrs) and 0.25 (6 hrs) days were conducted, while the influent COD concentration were remained the same. Among these tests, the maximum methane production rate (MPR) of 0.357 L CH4/L/d and 80% of methane component was achieved at 6 hrs HRT and 1.9 g COD/L/d organic loading rate (OLR). To simulate the domestic wastewater, the HRT and influent concentration were then reduced to 3 hrs and 237 mg COD/L, respectively, but had the same OLR as the test of 6 hrs HRT. Results showed that the COD removal efficiency had no significant difference, but the methane component reduced to 60%, and the MPR dramatically decreased to 0.121 L CH4/L/d. It seemed that the biogas production was adversely affected due to the low organic concentration of substrate. In the last test, with 3 hrs HRT, the influent used was the raw wastewater from Neihu WWTP, Taipei. Experimental results showed the effluent could meet the governmental effluent standard, and the COD removal efficiency, GPR, MPR and methane component at steady state were 87.5%, 0.31 L/L/d、0.198 L CH4/L/d and 63.67%, respectively,. Therefore, feasibility of application of the immobilized-cell for anaerobic treatment of the domestic wastewater and biogas production was successfully proved. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T05:11:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01631011-1.pdf: 1385984 bytes, checksum: 5791aa2bff4b723c3a18c2129693b644 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 III
Abstract IV 誌謝 VI 目錄 i 圖目錄 iii 表目錄 iv 第一章 前言及研究目的 1 1.1 前言 1 1.2 研究目的 2 第二章 文獻探討 3 2.1生活汙水 3 2.1.1 汙水組成 3 2.1.2 台北市生活汙水之處理 4 2.1.3 內湖汙水處理廠 4 2.2固定化細胞 5 2.2.1 固定化原理 5 2.2.2 固定化材質 5 2.2.3 固定化細胞之應用 8 2.2.4 固定化細胞之優點 9 2.3厭氧醱酵 10 2.3.1 背景與發展 10 2.3.2 原理 10 2.3.3 厭氧醱酵的影響因子 11 2.3.4 厭氧處理與活性汙泥法之比較 12 2.3.5 生活汙水相關研究案例 14 第三章 研究方法 16 3.1實驗流程 16 3.2實驗材料 19 3.2.1 厭氧汙泥 19 3.2.2 進流基質 19 3.2.3反應槽中填充之固定化細胞 19 3.3實驗設備 22 3.3.1反應槽主體 22 3.3.2氣體收集與量測裝置 23 3.4分析方法 23 3.4.1 pH 24 3.4.2化學需氧量 24 3.4.2總懸浮固體 24 3.4.5甲烷含量測定 24 第四章 結果與討論 26 4.1 固定化細胞製作及物性 26 4.2 厭氧消化試驗 27 4.2.1起動操作試驗 28 4.2.2人工廢水試驗 28 4.2.3都市廢水試驗 32 4.2.4綜合結果 35 4.2.5相關研究比較 37 4.3 有機負荷對厭氧消化的影響 39 4.4 HRT對厭氧消化的影響 41 4.5 都市廢水與人工廢水之比較 45 第五章 結論與建議 46 5.1 結論 46 5.2 建議 47 參考文獻 48 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 固定化細胞於都市廢水厭氧處理之可行性 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Feasibility on Immobilized Cells in Anaerobic Digestion of Domestic Wastewater | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 102-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林正芳(Cheng-Fang Lin),李允中(Yeun-Chung Lee) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 都市廢水,固定化細胞,厭氧醱酵,甲烷, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | domestic wastewater,immobilized-cell,anaerobic fermentation,methane, | en |
dc.relation.page | 50 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2014-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物產業機電工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生物機電工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.35 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。