Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 環境工程學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55742
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor馬鴻文(Hwong-Wen Ma)
dc.contributor.authorYu-Chen Hsiaoen
dc.contributor.author蕭宇辰zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T05:07:56Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-26
dc.date.copyright2014-08-26
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2014-08-20
dc.identifier.citation英文文獻
1. Bringezu, S., & Bleischwitz, R. (2009). Sustainable resource management: global trends, visions and policies: Greenleaf Publishing.
2. Dittrich, M., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., & Polzin, C. (2012). Green economies around the world? Implications of resource use for development and the environment. SERI-Sustainable Europe Research Institute. Vienna.
3. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process, 1971. Cambridge, Mass.
4. Giljum, S., Behrens, A., Hinterberger, F., Lutz, C., & Meyer, B. (2008). Modelling scenarios towards a sustainable use of natural resources in Europe. Environmental Science & Policy, 11(3), 204-216.
5. Graedel, T. (2010). Metal Stocks in Society: Scientific Synthesis: United Nations Environment Programme.
6. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1994). Economic growth and the environment: National Bureau of Economic Research.
7. Haas, W., Hertwich, E., Hubacek, K., Korytarova, K., Ornetzeder, M., & Weisz, H. (2005). THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CONSUMPTION Research Methods and Driving Forces. Director.
8. Hauschild, M. Z., Goedkoop, M., Guinee, J., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., Jolliet, O., . . . Laurent, A. (2013). Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(3), 683-697.
9. Hawkins, T., Hendrickson, C., Higgins, C., Matthews, H. S., & Suh, S. (2007). A mixed-unit input-output model for environmental life-cycle assessment and material flow analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(3), 1024-1031.
10. Hertwich, E. G. (2005). Life Cycle Approaches to Sustainable Consumption: A Critical Review. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(13), 4673-4684.
11. Huang, C.-L., Vause, J., Ma, H.-W., & Yu, C.-P. (2012). Using material/substance flow analysis to support sustainable development assessment: A literature review and outlook. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 68(0), 104-116. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.012
12. IES, I. (2010). Handbook: General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment–Detailed Guidance. JRC, IES.
13. IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change.
14. ISO, I. (2006). 14040: Environmental Management–Life Cycle Assessment–Principles and Framework. London: British Standards Institution.
15. Leontief, W. (1970). Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 52(3), 262-271.
16. Matthews, E., & Hutter, C. (2000). The weight of nations: World Resources Inst.
17. Mutel, C. L., & Hellweg, S. (2009). Regionalized life cycle assessment: computational methodology and application to inventory databases. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(15), 5797-5803.
18. Nakamura, Y., Kagesawa, T., Nishikawa, M., Hayashi, Y., Kobayashi, S., Niimi, T., & Matsuno, K. (2007). Soma-dependent modulations contribute to divergence of rhomboid expression during evolution of Drosophila eggshell morphology. Development, 134(8), 1529-1537.
19. Nurkse, R. (1966). Problems of capital formation in underdeveloped countries.
20. OECD. (2008a). measuring material flows and resource productivity.
21. OECD. (2008b). A Study on Methodologies Relevant to the OECD Approach on Sustainable Materials Management.
22. Ofstad, S., Westly, L., & Bratelli, T. (1994). Symposium: Sustainable Consumption: 19-20 January 1994: Oslo, Norway: Ministry of Environment.
23. Oslo. (1994). Sustainable production and consumption. Paper presented at the Sustainable production and consumption, Norway.
24. Pearce, D. (1994). Sustainable consumption through economic instruments. Paper presented at the Government of Norway Symposium on Sustainable Consumption, Oslo.
25. Rachagan, D., & Kanniah, R. (2001). Sustainable Consumption for Asia Pacific: Kuala Lumpur.
26. Robins, N., & Roberts, S. (1997). Changing Consumption and Production Patterns: Unlocking Trade Opportunities: Case Studies of Export Success from Developing Countries: International Institute for Environment and Development.
27. Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, S. I., Lambin, E., . . . Schellnhuber, H. J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology & society, 14(2).
28. Suh, S. (2006). Are services better for climate change? Environmental Science & Technology, 40(21), 6555-6560.
29. Suh, S., & Huppes, G. (2005). Methods for Life Cycle Inventory of a product. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(7), 687-697. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.04.001
30. Treloar, G. J., Love, P. E. D., Faniran, O. O., & Iyer-Raniga, U. (2000). A hybrid life cycle assessment method for construction. Construction Management & Economics, 18(1), 5-9.
31. Turner, G. M., Hoffman, R., McInnis, B. C., Poldy, F., & Foran, B. (2011). A tool for strategic biophysical assessment of a national economy–The Australian Stocks and Flows Framework. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(9), 1134-1149.
32. UNCSD. (1998). Consumer Protection: Guidelines for Sustainable Consumption: Report of the Secretary-General, United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development.
33. UNEP. (2009). Sustainable Consumption and Production.
34. UNEP. (2010a). ABC of SCP: Clarifying Concepts on Sustainable Consumption and Production.
35. UNEP. (2010b). Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Consumption and
36. Production: Priority Products and Materials.
37. UNEP. (2013a). Environmental Risks and Challenges of Anthropogenic Metals Flows and Cycles.
38. UNEP. (2013b). Recent Trends in Material Flows and Resource Productivity in Asia and the Pacific.
39. UNEP. (2014). Decoupling 2: technologies, opportunities and policy options.
40. Van der Voet, E., van Oers, L., Moll, S., Schutz, H., Bringezu, S., de Bruyn, S., . . . Warringa, G. (2005). Policy Review on Decoupling: Development of indicators to assess decoupling of economic development and environmental pressure in the EU-25 and AC-3 countries. EU Commission, DG Environment, Brussels.
41. Vringer, K., Benders, R., Wilting, H., Brink, C., Drissen, E., Nijdam, D., & Hoogervorst, N. (2010). A hybrid multi-region method (HMR) for assessing the environmental impact of private consumption. Ecological Economics, 69(12), 2510-2516.
42. Weisz, H., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Schutz, H., Haas, W., & Schaffartzik, A. (2007). Economy-wide material flow accounting. A compilation guide. Eurostat and the European Commission.
43. Wernick, I. K., & Irwin, F. H. (2005). Material flows accounts: A tool for making environmental policy Material flows accounts: a tool for making environmental policy: WRI.
44. Williams, E. D., Weber, C. L., & Hawkins, T. R. (2009). Hybrid Framework for Managing Uncertainty in Life Cycle Inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(6), 928-944. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00170.x
中文文獻
45. 王俊傑. (2008). 台灣產業環境衝擊關聯分析與永續消費型態探討. (碩士), 臺灣大學, 台北市.
46. 王塗發. (1986). 投入產出分析及其應用-台灣地區實證研究, 台灣銀行季刋, 第三十七卷一期.
47. 台灣綜合研究院. (2010). 因應國際情勢之整體能源政策分析及能源會議後續 (經濟部能源局委託, Trans.).
48. 行政院主計處. (2006). 產業關聯表編製報告
49. 呂政霖. (2001). 臺灣地區人造纖維業產業經濟分析及產品結構優化研究.
50. 李佳禾. (2013). 投入產出方法分析電子電機產業含鉛廢棄物質直接及間接流布. (博士), 臺灣大學, 台北市.
51. 李孟穎, 陳必晟, 洪明龍, & 馬鴻文. (2009). 環境加權物質流指標於國家永續物
52. 質管理之應用. Paper presented at the 2009 環境規劃與管理研討會.
53. 李高朝, & 行政院經濟建設委員會. (2005). 實用產業關聯分析精義: 行政院經濟建設委員會.
54. 沈宗桓. (2002). 工業部門能源消費與 CO2, SOx 及 NOx 排放之特性分析.
55. 林姿君. (2010). 台灣資源生產力解析: 投入產出分析及因素分解法之應用: National Taiwan University Department of Environmental Engineering.
56. 張新珮. (2010). 永續消費導向之產業政策規劃: 以鋼鐵業為例: National Taiwan University Department of Environmental Engineering.
57. 廖世机. (2006). 消費者保護與永續消費
58. 廖世机. (2009). 臺灣永續消費政策綱領之研議.
59. 趙家緯. (2013). 型塑公共政策生態理性—整合性環境評估模型之發展與應用. (博士), 臺灣大學, 台北市.
60. 盧素涵、陳仲宜. (2012). 金屬二次加工產業與自動化發展困境.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55742-
dc.description.abstract儘管過去經濟的飛快成長使全球無數人脫離貧困,並朝向高生活品質的生活前進,但如影隨形且日益漸增的環境污染,卻是全人類無法承受之重,甚至反噬經濟發展之成果。因此,有別於(Georgescu-Roegen, 1971)認為經濟成長必然伴隨著污染環境的副產物,(Grossman, 1994)提出了脫鉤(Decoupling)的概念,在經濟不斷成長的情況下,許多富裕國家可透過新技術與法規而減少環境污染,從而使經濟成長與環境污染「脫鉤」。2002年世界永續發展高峰會(WSSD)中即發表約翰內斯堡執行計劃與永續發展宣言,以支持各國朝向永續消費與生產模式前進,並期望經濟發展與環境惡化脫鉤,在生態系統有限涵容能力中推動社會經濟發展。
因此,當探討國家脫鉤議題時,高度經濟發展與環境影響產業勢必為討論的核心,而金屬產業即為此類重要產業,許多研究都指出金屬物質或部門於台灣環境之重要性(UNEP, 2010;Van der Voet, 2005;王俊傑, 2008;李孟穎, 2009)。
然而,為打破以往評估環境影響有煙囪才有排放之概念,以及上述研究結果之限制,本研究以趙家緯發展之台灣整合型環境評估模型為基礎,因適切性發展台灣整合性金屬產業環境評估模型,同時評估金屬產業相關之環境影響,並分別以消費與生產面觀點檢視95年台灣金屬產業應優先限制與改善的相關產業或最終消費類別。
藉由評估結果顯示金屬產業佔台灣環境影響約佔15-20%,進一步以消費與生產面檢視金屬產業之環境影響。消費面應從金屬產業著手,其佔整體金屬產業環境影響約八成,主要以鋼鐵初級製品、金屬製品與機械設備部門之消費為主要影響因素,其主要最終消費類別為出口約佔八成,其餘兩成為資本形成。其次,次要消費管理目標為營建工程,其為滿足資本形成(如建設住宅、廠房)衍生之環境影響於金屬產業中也不容小覷;另一方面,生產面則有別於消費面,生產面管理則應著眼於金屬產業供應鏈中其他產業進行管理,如人體健康方面以其他陸上運輸、鋼鐵初級製品、海外礦業、粗鋼製程與資源回收處理部門為主;生態品質方面,以國外礦業為主、歐美進口之鋼鐵原料次之;氣候變遷方面,則以粗鋼製程、其他地區之電力供應、燃煤電廠與進口鋼鐵原料為主;水資源耗用方面,以中東地區煉油為主。
並依此結果,希望未來決策者能以永續生產與消費之概念,分別針對生產與消費面提供各環節效率提升與排放削減之建議。生產面系統革新與限制可透過大規模的升級、更新,並使用最佳可行技術替代,提升生產模式各環節之效率;而消費面,並進一步減少對產品服務的需求與提升使用效率,以此大幅削減金屬產業的環境影響程度,期望達到經濟發展與環境污染脫鉤的終極目的。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWill the country be able to sustain economic growth without making environmental pressures? That’s the only question we want to ask and respond to. Therefore, the objective of this thesis is to find out any possibility that economic growth and the environmental pressures could be decoupled. In our country, the consumption and production from the major industries play an important role in the domestic and foreign region, and also in the economy or environment. The metal industry is exactly one of those major industries, which are engergy intensive, material intensive, highly pollutoin, and high industrial linkage in economy and environment. To consider the ”decoupling”, it is necessary to investigate the metal industry, including sectors of iron and steel primary products, miscellaneous metals, fabricated metal products, mechanical equipment, crude steel and aluminum ingot, from the consumption and production perspective in Taiwan.
This study used Integrated Environmental Assessment Model for Metal Industry in Taiwan (TWMIEA) as a tool to analyze of the consumption and production from metal industry and other metal-related industries. This tool is based on Input-Output Tables in 2006 and Integrated Environmental Assessment Model for Public Policy in Taiwan (TWIEA) developed by (Chao, 2013). TWMIEA are somehow different from TWIEA. First, TWMIEA does not take the environmental impacts from using stage into consideration, because this study focuses on the stage of consumption and production. Second, this study establishes the hybrid multi-region metal inventory analysis model, because of its character. Third, this study only considers the environmental impacts which are relevant with metal industry, and then, use TWMIEA to analyze metal industry in the consumption and production perspective in Taiwan.
This thesis evaluates environmental impacts, including human health, eco-quality, climate change, and water resource, in all kinds of final demand related with metal industry. The highest impacts caused by consumption is mostly by export and a little by capital formation. Fursermore, the management of consumption should be focused on construction and metal industry, especially sectors of iron and steel primary products, fabricated metal products, and mechanical equipment. On the contrary, the main impacts from production is caused by other metal-related industries in various environmental impacts. As for impact of human health, the sectors of Other Land Transportation (TW), iron and steel primary products (TW), Minerals (Foreign), crude steel (TW) and Materials Recovery (TW) are important sectors in the metal related industriesin the impact. For the eco-quality, the main impact is caused by minerals (Foreign) and ferrous metals (USA&EU) sectors. For climate change, the sectors of crude steel (TW), electricity (Foreign), coal-fired power plant (TW), and ferrous metals (Foreign) are the major environmental pressures. For the water resource, sector of Oil (middleeast) caused massive environmental pressure of water resource. Except to major sectors in each environmental impacts, the result shows another issue that Taiwan makes the consumption, but foreign countries suffer from these consumptions.
As a result, this study emphasizes on consumption and production from a whole life cycle perspective. Although those two perspectives have different target of management, it still affects each other in the same life cycle. If we want to reach the goal of decoupling, it is necessary to manege the highly economic growth and environmental pressures industries like metal industry either in the consumption or production perspective.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T05:07:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-103-R01541119-1.pdf: 4005516 bytes, checksum: 6fbdd59cb524b596859a214d61a570ca (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.2研究目的 2
1.3研究架構與流程 3
第二章 文獻回顧 5
2.1金屬永續生產與消費 5
2.1.1永續生產與消費 5
2.1.2永續生產與消費管理策略 8
2.2金屬產業於脫鉤之重要性 12
2.2.1金屬產業之經濟影響 12
2.2.2金屬產業之環境影響 18
2.3產業環境影響評估方法彙整 25
2.3.1物質流生命週期分析 25
2.3.2環境延伸投入產出分析 31
2.3.3混合型生命週期評估 37
2.4文獻回顧小結 40
第三章 研究方法 41
3.1台灣整合性影響評估模型介紹 43
3.2.1基本模型介紹 43
3.2.3模型計算結構說明 48
3.2台灣整合性金屬產業環境評估模型 50
3.2.1台灣整合性金屬產業環境評估模型特色 50
3.2.2效率因子應用於模型之操作說明 52
3.3金屬產業整合性環境評估方法 56
3.3.1研究範疇 56
3.3.2金屬產業整合性環境評估方法 59
3.3.3分析方法之環境管理意涵 63
第四章 結果與討論-台灣金屬產業整合性環境評估 64
4.1金屬產業供應鏈於台灣環境之重要性 64
4.2台灣金屬產業環境熱點之消費面分析 66
4.2.1金屬產業環境熱點之消費分析 66
4.2.2金屬產業供應鏈環境熱點之消費分析 68
4.3台灣金屬產業環境熱點之生產面分析 70
4.3.1人體健康指標 70
4.3.2生態品質指標 72
4.3.3氣候變遷指標 75
4.3.4水資源耗用指標 77
4.4台灣金屬產業整合性影響評估之結果與建議 80
第五章、結論與建議 84
第六章 參考文獻 87
附件一、國內經濟部門分類 91
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject生命週期評估zh_TW
dc.subject混合型投入產出盤查分析zh_TW
dc.subject金屬產業zh_TW
dc.subject脫鉤zh_TW
dc.subject永續生產與消費zh_TW
dc.subjectDecouplingen
dc.subjectsustainable consumption and productionen
dc.subjectmetal industryen
dc.subjectInput-Output analysisen
dc.subjecthybrid LCAen
dc.title台灣金屬產業整合性環境評估zh_TW
dc.titleIntegrated Environmental Assessment of Metal Industry in Taiwanen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear102-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee李公哲(Kung-Cheh Li),趙家緯(Chao,Chia-Wei)
dc.subject.keyword永續生產與消費,脫鉤,金屬產業,混合型投入產出盤查分析,生命週期評估,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordDecoupling,sustainable consumption and production,metal industry,Input-Output analysis,hybrid LCA,en
dc.relation.page91
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2014-08-20
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept環境工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:環境工程學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-103-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
3.91 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved