請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55156
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 郭瑞祥(Ruey-Shan Guo),陳忠仁(Chung-Jen Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Ting Cheng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 鄭伃婷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:49:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-03-13 | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-01-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Acquaah, M., & Yasai-Ardekani, M. 2008. Does the Implementation of a Combination Competitive Strategy Yield Incremental Performance Benefits? A New Perspective From a Transition Economy in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Business Research, 61(4): 346-354.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1993. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, London: Sage. Aulakh, P. S., Kotabe, M., & Teegen, H. 2000. Export Strategies and Performance of Firms from Emerging Economies: Evidence from Brazil, Chile, and Mexico. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 342-361. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. 2009. The Complementary Effects of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Profitability in Small Business. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(4): 443-464. Barton, S. L., & Gordon, P. J. 1988. Corporate Strategy and Capital Structure. Strategic Managment Journal, 9(6): 623-632. Bauer, R., & Guenster, N. 2004. Empirical Evidence on Corporate Governance in Europe: The Effect on Stock Returns, Firm Value and Performance. Journal of Asset Management, 5(2): 91-104. Bierly, P. E., & Daly, P. S. 2007. Alternative Knowledge Strategies, Competitive Environment, and Organizational Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(4): 493-516. Bin, G. 2006. Firm Size, R&D, and Performance: An Empirical Analysis on Software Industry in China. Science Research Management, 1: 018. Bonnet, D. C. 1986. Nature of the R&D/Marketing Co-Operation in the Design of Technologically Advanced New Industrial Products. R&D Management, 16(2): 117-126. Bourgeois, L. J. 1981. On the Measurement of Organizational Slack. Academy of Management Revew, 6(1): 29-39. Campbell-Hunt, C. 2000. What Have We Learned about Generic Competitive Strategy? A Meta-Analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2): 127-154. Cheng, C. F., Lai, M. K., & Wu, W. Y. 2010. Exploring the Impact of Innovation Strategy on R&D Employees' Job Satisfaction: A Mathematical Model and Empirical Research. Technovation, 30(7): 459-470. Clercq, D. D., Menguc, B., & Auh, S. 2009. Unpacking the Relationship between an Innovation Strategy and Firm Performance: The Role of Task Conflict and Political Activity. Journal of Business Research, 62(11): 1046-1053. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1). Colombo, M. G., Grilli, L., & Murtinu, S. 2011. R&D Subsidies and the Performance of High-Tech Start-Ups. Economics Letters., 112(1): 97-99. Cui, H., & Mak, Y. T. 2002. The Relationship between Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance in High R&D Firms. Journal of Coporate Finance, 8(4): 313-336. Day, G. S. 1994. The Capabilities of Market-Driven Oranizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4): 37-53. Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. 1999. Success in High-Technology Market: Is Marketing Capability Critical? Marketing Science, 18(4): 547-568. Ebben, J. J., & Johnson, A. C. 2005. Efficiency, Flexibility, or Both? Evidence Linking Strategy to Performance in Small Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(13): 1249-1259. Feldman, M. P., & Kelley, M. R. 2003. Leveraging Research and Development: Assessing the Impact of the US Advanced Technology Program. Small Business Economics, 20(2): 153-165. Feldman, M. P., & Kelley, M. R. 2006. The Ex Ante Assessment of Knowledge Spillovers: Government R&D Policy, Economic Incentives and Private Firm Behavior. Research Policy, 35(10): 1509-1521. Fornell, C. 1992. A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience. Journal of Marketing, 56: 6-21. Fornell, C., Johnson, M., Anderson, E., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. 1996. The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings. Journal of Marketing, 60: 7-18. Geringer, J. M., Tallman, S., & Olsen, D. M. 2000. Product and International Diversification among Japanese Multinational Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1): 51-80. Goold, M., & Luchs, K. 1993. Why Diversify? Four Decades of Management Thinking. The Academy of Management Executive, 7(3): 7-25. Graves, S. B., & Langowitz, N. S. 1993. Innovation Productivity and Returns to Scale in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8): 593-605. Greenley, G. E. 1995. Forms of Market Orientation in UK Companies. Journal of Management Studies, 32(1): 47-66. Guan, J. C., Yam, R. C. M., Tang, E. P. Y., & Lau, A. K. W. 2009. Innovation Strategy and Performance during Economic Transition: Evidences in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 38(5): 802-812. Gupta, A. K., & Rogers., E. M. 1991. Internal Marketing: Intergrating R&D and Marketing within the Organization. Journal of Service Marketing, 5(2): 55-68. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. 1998. Multivariate Analysis. Englewood: Prentice Hall International. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. 1984. Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review: 149-164. Hansen, G. S., & Wernerfelt, B. 1989. Determinants of Firm Performances: The Relative Importance of Economic and Organizational Factors. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 399-411. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. 1994. A Mid-range Theory of the Interactive Effects of International and Product Diversification on Innovation and Performance. Journal of Management, 20: 297-326. Hoskisson, R. E., & Busenitz, L. W. 2002. Market Uncertainty and Learning Distance in Corporate Entrepreneurship Entry Mode Choice. Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a mindset: 151-172. Hsu, C. W., & Chiang, H. C. 2001. The Government Strategy for the Upgrading of Industrial Technology in Taiwan. Technovation, 21(2): 123-132. Hsu, F. M., Horng, D. J., & Hsueh, C. C. 2009. The Effect of Government-sponsored R&D Programmes on Additionally in Recipient Firms in Taiwan. Technovation, 29(3): 204-217. Hsu, Y. G., Tzeng, G. H., & Shyu, J. Z. 2003. Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Selection of Government-Sponsored Frontier Technology R&D Projects. R&D Management, 33(5): 539-551. Hu, J. L., & Hsu, Y. H. 2008. The More Interactive, the More Innovative? A Case Study of South Korean Cellular Phone Manufactures. Technovation, 28(1): 75-87. Huang, C. C., Chu, P. Y., & Chiang, Y. H. 2008. A Fuzzy AHP Application in Government-Sponsored R&D Project Selection. Omega, 36(6): 1038-1052. Hult, T. G., & Ketchen, D. J. 2001. Does Market Orientation Matter? A Test of the Relationship between Positional Advantage and Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 899-906. Jayachandran, S., & Krasnikov, A. 2008. The Relative Impact of Marketing, Reserach-and-Development, and Operations Capabilities on Firm Performance. Journal of Marketing, 72(4): 1-11. Kaminski, P. C., de Oliveira, A. C., & Lopes, T. M. 2008. Knowledge Transfer in Product Development Processes: A Case Study in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) of the Metal-Mechanic Sector from Sao Paulo, Brazil. Technovation, 28(1): 29-36. Kara, A., Spillan, J. E., & Deshields, O. W. 2005. The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Performance: A Study of Small-Sized Service Retailers Using MARKOR Scale. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(2): 105-118. Kim, E., Nam, D. I., & Stimpert, J. L. 2004. Testing the Applicability of Porter's Generic Strategies in the Digital Age: A Study of Korea Cyber Malls. Journal of Business Strategies, 21(1). Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. 2005. Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of Its Antecedents and Impact on Performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2): 24-41. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. 1990. Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing, 54: 1-18. Lach, S. 2002. Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D? Evidence from Israel. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(4): 369-390. Lahiri, N., & Narayanan, S. 2013. Vertical Integration, Innovation, and Alliance Portfolio Size: Implications for Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34(9): 1042-1064. Lai, C. S. 2007. The Effects of Influence Strategies on Dealer Satisfaction and Performance in Taiwan's Motor Industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4): 518-527. Lamberti, L., & Noci, G. 2010. Marketing Strategy and Marketing Performance Measurement System: Exploring the Relationship. European Management Journal, 28(2): 139-152. Lee, C., & Griffith, D. A. 2004. The Marketing Strategy-Performance Relationship in an Export-Driven Developing Economy. A Korean Illustration. International Marketing Review, 21(3): 321-334. Lessard, D. R. 1976. World, Country, and Industry Relationships in Equity Returns: Implications for Risk Reduction through International Diversification. Financial Analysis Journal, 32: 32-38. Lin, B. W., Lee, Y., & Hung, S. C. 2006. R&D Intensity and Commercialization Orientation Effects on Financial Performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(6): 679-685. Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. 2004. International Diversification and Firm Performance: The S-Curve Hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4): 598-609. McConaugby, D. L., Mattbews, C. H., & Fialko, A. S. 2001. Founding Family Controlled Firms: Performance, Risk, and Value. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1): 31-49. Merlo, O., & Auh, S. 2009. The Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Market Orientation, and Marketing Subunit Influence on Firm Performance. Market Letters, 20(3): 295-311. Minggui, Y., Yafu, H., & Hongbo, P. 2010. Political Connections, Rent Seeking, and the Fiscal Subsidy Efficiency of Local Governments. Economic Research Journal, 3: 65-77. Morbey, G. K. 1988. R&D: Its Relationship to Company Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Mnanagement, 5(3): 191-200. Morgan, N. A., & Rego, L. L. 2009. Alternative Knowledge Strategies, Competitive Environment, and Organizational Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31(4): 493-516. Mosakowski, E. 1991. Organizational Boundaries and Economic Performance: An Empirical Study of Entrepreneurial Computer Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2): 115-133. Narasimhan, R., & Kim, S. W. 2002. Effect of Supply Chain Integration on the Relationship Between Diversification and Performance: Evidence from Japanese and Korea Firms. Journal of Operations Management, 20(3): 303-323. Neill, S., & Rose, G. M. 2006. The Effect of Strategic Complexity on Marketing Strategy and Organizational Performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(1): 1-10. O'Brien, J. P. 2003. The Capital Structure Implications of Pursuing a Strategy of Innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5): 415-431. Olavarrieta, S., & Friedmann, R. 2008. Market Orientation, Knowledge-Related Resources and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Research, 61: 623-630. Palich, L. E., Cardinal, L. B., & Chet, M. C. 2000. Curvilinearity on the Diversification Performance Linkage: An Examination of over Three Decades of Research. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2): 155-174. Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press. Revilla, E., Sarkis, J., & Modrego, A. 2003. Evaluating Performance of Public-Private Research Collaborations: A DEA Analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society., 54(2): 165-174. Ruekert, R. W., & Walker, O. C. 1987. Interactions between Marketing and R&D Departments in Implementing Different Business Strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 8(3): 233-248. Sanz-Menendez, L. 1995. Research Actors and the State: Research Evaluation and Evaluation of Science and Technology Policies in Spain. Reserach Evaluation, 5(1): 79-88. Sharfman, M. P., Wolf, G., Chase, R. B., & Tansik, D. A. 1988. Antecedents of Organizational Slack. Academy of Management Revew, 13(4): 601-614. Singh, J. V. 1986. Performance, Slack and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3): 562-585. Smith, C. G., & Cooper, A. C. 1988. Established Companies Diversifying into Young Industries: A Comparison of Firms with Different Levels of Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2): 111-121. Song, X. M., Neeley, S. M., & Zhao, Y. 1996. Managing R&D-Marketing Integration in the New Product Development Process. Industrial Marketing Management, 25(6): 545-553. Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. 2001. An Examination into the Causal Logic of Rent Generation: Contrasting Porter's Competitive Strategy Framework and the Resource-Based Perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10): 907-934. Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. 2004. Strategy and Industry Effects on Profitability: Evidence from Greece. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2): 139-165. Srinivasan, S., & Hanssens, D. M. 2009. Marketing and Firm Value: Metrics, Methods, Findings, and Future Directions. Journal of Marketing Research: 46(3): 293-312. Suinkula, J. M. 1994. Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning. The Journal of Marketing: 35-45. Tan, J., & Peng, M. W. 2003. Organizational Slack and Firm Performance during Economic Transitions: Two Studies from an Emerging Economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13): 1249-1263. Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. 1986. Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly: 439-465. Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. 2005. Benchmarking Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Journal of Marketing, 69(1): 80-94. Wallsten, S. J. 2000. The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research. RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1): 82-100. Wan, W. P. 2005. Country Resource Environments, Firm Capabilities, and Corporate Diversificaiton Strategies. Journal of Management Studies 42(1): 161-182. Wan, W. P., Hoskisson, R. E., & Rovert, E. 2003. Home Country Environments, Corporate Diversification Strategies, and Firm Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1): 27-45. Xu, E., & Zhang, H. 2008. The Impact of State Shares on Corporate in Innovation Strategy and Performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(3): 473-487. Zahra, S. A., & Hayton, J. C. 2008. The Effect of International Venturing on Firm Performance: The Moderating Influence of Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2): 195-220. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55156 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究將探究公司策略與公司績效的關聯性,並以政府補助做為調和變數。本研究將公司策略分為研發導向及行銷導向,並檢視不同公司策略對公司績效的影響,同時以台灣業界科專補助為調和變數,研究在不同公司策略下,參加業界科專是否對公司績效有幫助。本研究以台灣上市上櫃的電機電子產業及生物科技產業為樣本,共316項科專計畫,並利用台灣新報所提供之資訊進行迴歸分析。根據研究結果顯示,研發導向公司策略與公司績效呈現負向關係,而政府補助對研發導向公司具有正向調和效果;而對行銷導向公司策略來說,其與公司績效呈現正向關係,且政府補助也具有正向調和效果。依據此迴歸結果,本研究認為研發導向公司因長期致力於研發,投入之成本短期內無法轉變成為利潤,因此對公司績效短期內有負向影響,但是若加入政府的研發計畫,可以透過政府補助減緩財務上的損失,因此對公司績效為正向的影響。而對行銷導向的公司策略來說,其具備了解市場的能力且與顧客關係緊密連結,因此可以幫助公司提升績效,而參與業界科專後可以讓行銷導向策略公司結合行銷以及研發能力,因應顧客需求讓研發成果更能快速推展到市場上,因此加入業界科專對於提升行銷導向公司的公司績效也是有幫助的。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study investigates the effect of firm strategy on firm performance with a moderating effect of government subsidy. We examine different firm strategies, in terms of R&D orientation firm strategy and marketing orientation firm strategy, and their effects on firm performance. We also identify the moderating effect of Industrial Technology Development Program (ITDP) subsidy on the relationship above. Using 316 R&D project in electrics and electronics industry and biotechnology industry which are listed in the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TSE) and Over-the-Counter (OTC), we found that R&D orientation firm strategy are negatively related to firm performance, but positively moderated by government subsidy, while firms with marketing orientation firm strategy are positively associated with firm performance, and positively moderated by government subsidy as well. According to the empirical results in this study, we conclude that the government subsidy act as a financial support for the firms with R&D orientation firm strategy and could alleviate the financial deficit period of R&D activities. For marketing orientation firm strategy firms, government subsidy on R&D project could enhance the integration of marketing and R&D abilities, which could better satisfy customer and ultimately lead to higher firm performance. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:49:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-103-R01741011-1.pdf: 645537 bytes, checksum: 579c9c655ba9dd86c07cf43cd72317ac (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv Table of Contents v Figure List vii Table List viii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Research Objective 4 Chapter 2 Literature Review and Hypotheses 7 2.1 The Determinants of Firm Performance 7 2.2 The Effect of R&D Orientation Firm Strategy 11 2.3 The Effect of Marketing Orientation Firm Strategy 12 2.4 The Contingency Effect of Government Subsidy 13 Chapter 3 Research Design and Methodology 16 3.1 Research Framework 16 3.2 Data Collection and Sample 17 3.3 Measures 18 3.3.1 Dependent Variables 18 3.3.2 Independent Variable 19 3.3.3 Moderating Variable 20 3.3.4 Control Variables 20 Chapter 4 Results 23 Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusions 29 5.1 Research Conclusions 29 5.2 Managerial Implications 32 5.3 Limitation and Future Research 35 References 37 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 公司策略與公司績效之關聯性研究-政府補助之調和效果 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Relationship between Firm Strategy and Firm Performance—The Moderating Effect of Government Subsidy | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳俊忠,吳學良 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 公司策略,研發導向,行銷導向,政府補助,公司績效, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | firm strategy,R&D orientation,marketing orientation,government subsidy,firm performance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 45 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-01-26 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 商學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-103-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 630.41 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。