Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55122Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳榮華 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shih-Han Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃詩涵 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:48:02Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2015-03-13 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-03-13 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-01-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一．高達美的著作與論文
（一）德文本 Hermeneutik I: Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzuege einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Gesammelte Werke, Band 1. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1986. Hermeneutik II: Wahrheit und Methode: Ergaengungen Register. Gesammelte Werke, Band 1. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1986. （二）英譯本 Philosophical Hermeneutics. Edited and translated by David E. Linge. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976. 'On the Problematic Character of Aesthetic Consciousness.' Translated by E. Kelley. Gadamer Faculty Philosophy Journal 9, 31-40, 1982. The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Edited by R. Bernasconi. Translated by N. Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. “On the Scope and Function of Hermeneutical Reflection.” Translated by G. B. Hess and R. E. Palmer. Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy, Edited by B. Wachterhauser. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 277-99, 1986. “What is Truth?” Translated by B. Wachterhauser. Hermeneutics and Truth. Edited by B. Wachterhauser. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 33-46 1994. Gadamer on Celan: “Who am I and Who are you?” and other Essays. Translated and edited by R. Heinemann and B. Krajewski. Albany: SUNY Press, 1997. “Reflection on My Philosophical Journey.” The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Edited by L. Hahn, Vol. 24, The Library of Living Philosophers. Chicago and LaSalle: Open Court, pp. 2-63, 1997. “Plato as Portraitist.” Translated by J. Findling and S. Gabova. Continental Philosophy Review 33, 245-74, 2000. Truth and Method. Translated by J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall. 2nd revised edition. London: Continuum, 2004. The Gadamer Reader: A Bouquet of the Later Writings. Edited and Translated by R. E. Palmer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2007. （三）中譯本 《詮釋學Ｉ真理與方法－哲學詮釋學的基本特徵》，洪漢鼎譯，北京：商務印書館，2010年。 《詮釋學Ｉ真理與方法－補充與索引》，洪漢鼎譯，北京：商務印書館，2010年。 二．其他參考資料 Beistegui, Miguel de, Aesthetics after Metaphysics: From Mimesis to Metaphor. New York: Routledge, 2012. Bernasconi, Robert. “Bridging the Abyss: Heidegger and Gadamer.” Research in Phenomenology 16, 1-19, 1986. Carpenter, David. “Emanation, Incarnation, and the Truth-Event in Gadamer’s Truth and Method” Hermeneutics and Truth. Edited by B. Wachterhauser. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 98-122, 1994. Cooper, David, Stephen Davies, Kathleen Marrie Higgins, Robert Hopkins, and Robert Stecker. Ed. A Companion to Aesthetics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992. Danto, Arthur Coleman. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981. Davey, Nicholas. “Gadamer and the Ambiguity of Appearance.” Rediscovering Aesthetics: Transdisciplinary Voices From Art History, Philosophy, and Art Practice. Edited by F. Halsall, J. Jansen, and T. O’Connoer. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 147-62, 2009. --- Unfinished Worlds: Hermeneutics, Aesthetics and Gadamer. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013. Derrida, Jacques. 'The Double Session.' Dissemination. Translated by B. Johnson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981. Dickie, George. Introduction to Aesthetics: An Analytic Approach. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. Dostal, Robert. “Gadamer’s Platonism: His Recovery of Mimesis and Anamnesis.” Consequences of Hermeneutics: Fifty Years After Gadamer’s Truth and Method. Edited by J. Malpas and S. Zabala. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2010. --- Ed. The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Gebauer, Gunter. Mimesis: Culture, Art, Society. Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1995. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. “Aesthetic Education of a Playgoer.” A Source Book in Theatrical History. Edited and translated by A. M. Nagler. New York: Courier Dover Publication, 2013. Gombrich, Ernst. Art and Illusion. 5th edition. London: Phaidon, 1977. Grodin, Jean. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994. --- Source of Hermeneutics. Albany: SUNY Press, 1995. Halliwell, Stephen. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2009. Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. New York: Harper and Row, 1962. --- Poetry, Language, Thought. Translated by A. Hofstadter. New York: Harper and Row, 1971. Janaway, Christopher. Images of Excellence: Plato's Critique of the Arts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Judgment. Translated by W.S. Pluhar. Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1987. Kockelmans, J. Heidegger on Art and Art Works. Dordrecht. Nijhoff, 1985. Krajewski, Bruce. Gadamer's Repercussions: Reconsidering Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004. Kristeller, Paul Oskar. 'The Modern System of the Arts: A Study in the History of Aesthetics Part I.' Journal of the History of Ideas 12.4, 496-527, 1951. Lawn, Chris. Gadamer: A Guide for the Perplexed. London and New York: Continuum, 2006. Lucas, Donald William. Aristotle: Poetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968. Morgan, Douglas. “Must Art Tell the Truth?” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26, 17–27, 1967. Mulhall, Stephen. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Heidegger and Being and Time. 2nd edition. London: Routledge, 2005. Nehamas, Alexander. 'Plato on Imitation and Poetry in Republic 10.' Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts. Edited by J. M. E. Moravcsik and P. Temko. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield, 1982. Plato. The Being of the Beautiful: Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman. Translated and with commentary by S. Benardete. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006. --- Republic. Translated by R. Waterfield. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. Philostratus. The Life of Apollonius of Tyana. Translated by F. C. Conybeare. London: Heinemann, 1912. Risser, James. “The Remembrance of Truth: The Truth of Rememberance.” Hermeneutics and Truth. Edited by B. Wachterhauser. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 123-136, 1994. --- Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer's Philosophical Hermeneutics. Albany: SUNY Press, 1997. Sorbom, Goran. “The Classical Concept of Mimesis.” A Companion to Art Theory. Edited by P. Smith and C. Wilde. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2002. Tate, Daniel. “Transforming Mimesis.” Epoche: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13, 185-208, 2008. Vattimo, G. Art's Claim to Truth. Edited by S. Zabala and translated by L. D'Isanto. New York: Columbia University Press. Wachterhauser, Brice. Beyond Being: Gadamer’s Post-Platonic Hermeneutic Ontology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1999. --- Ed. Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy. Albany, New York: SUNY Press, 1986. Zhadova, Larissa Alekseevna. Malevich: Suprematism and Revolution in Russian Art, 1910-1930. London: Thames and Hudson, 1982. Plato. 《理想國篇：譯注與詮釋》，徐學庸譯注，台北：臺灣商務2009。 陳榮華，《高達美詮釋學：真理與方法導讀》，台北：三民書局 2011。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55122 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 模仿論長久以來被認為是過時的理論。但本文將說明高達美模仿論如何挑戰此成見。在指出高達美藝術哲學汲取了古典模仿概念裡去除藝術神秘化的「重認」元素後，我們將說明高達美如何推翻了柏拉圖所堅持的原型對模仿支配，活化了兩者的雙邊關係，因而其模仿論解決了柏拉圖模仿論的困難，而且能夠說明各個類型的藝術品。這些討論清楚證明了高達美革新了這個古老傳統，建構出一個合理的當代模仿論。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Mimetic theory of art has been seen as an outdated theory for a long time, but this thesis shows how Gadamer’s theory of mimesis challenges this prejudice. After demonstrating that Gadamer inherits the element of “recognition” from classical concept of mimesis, we explain how Gadamer repudiates the dominance of original over imitation that Plato insists, and thus his theory of mimesis resolves the problems resulting from Plato’s insistence and is able to explain the phenomena of various artworks. These discussions provide a clear illustration that Gadamer refreshes the old tradition, and in addition constructs a reasonable contemporary theory of mimesis. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:48:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R00124016-1.pdf: 981535 bytes, checksum: f85407c8164c77f986dc291c122eccdf (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract iv 緒論 1 第一節 本文主題說明 1 第二節 本文架構與主要內容 3 第一章 對模仿論傳統的承襲與批判 5 第一節 對模仿論傳統的承襲：模仿要求重認 5 第二節 對柏拉圖模仿論的批判：藝術不受目的支配 12 第三節 小結 18 第二章 模仿是原型存有的豐盈 19 第一節 原型在重認裡再次呈現 19 第二節 原型在重認裡更豐富地呈現 25 第三節 模仿遊戲的無目的性 35 第三章 對高達美模仿論的批判與辯護 37 第一節 模仿、轉型成為結構與理解的有限性 37 第二節 模仿的普遍性 43 第三節 小結 51 結論 53 參考書目 55 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 哲學詮釋學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 高達美 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 柏拉圖 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 模仿 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 藝術哲學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Gadamer | en |
| dc.subject | mimesis | en |
| dc.subject | philosophy of art | en |
| dc.subject | philosophical hermeneutics | en |
| dc.subject | Plato | en |
| dc.title | 論高達美藝術哲學的模仿論 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | On the Theory of Mimesis in Gadamer's Philosophy of Art | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林維杰,陸敬忠 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 高達美,模仿,藝術哲學,哲學詮釋學,柏拉圖, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Gadamer,mimesis,philosophy of art,philosophical hermeneutics,Plato, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 60 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-01-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 哲學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf Restricted Access | 958.53 kB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.