請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55042完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林裕彬(Yu-Pin Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sih-Yin Chou | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 周思吟 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:45:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-03-13 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-03-13 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-02-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Aebischer, Nicholas J, Robertson, Peter A, & Kenward, Robert E. (1993). Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology, 74(5), 1313-1325.
2. Akcakaya, H Reşi̇t, & Atwood, Jonathan L. (1997). A habitat‐based metapopulation model of the California gnatcatcher. Conservation Biology, 11(2), 422-434. 3. Arponen, Anni, Kondelin, Hanna, & Moilanen, Atte. (2007). Area‐Based Refinement for Selection of Reserve Sites with the Benefit‐Function Approach. Conservation Biology, 21(2), 527-533. 4. Baillie, Jonathan, Hilton-Taylor, Craig, & Stuart, Simon N. (2004). 2004 IUCN red list of threatened species: a global species assessment: IUCN. 5. Ball, IR, & Possingham, HP. (2000). MARXAN (V1. 8.2). Marine Reserve Design Using Spatially Explicit Annealing, a Manual. 6. Ban, Natalie Corinna, & Klein, Carissa Joy. (2009). Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning. Conservation Letters, 2(5), 206-215. 7. Bedward, Michael, Pressey, Robert L, & Keith, David A. (1992). A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis. Biological Conservation, 62(2), 115-125. 8. Beger, Maria, Jones, Geoffrey P, & Munday, Philip L. (2003). Conservation of coral reef biodiversity: a comparison of reserve selection procedures for corals and fishes. Biological Conservation, 111(1), 53-62. 9. Benabdallah, Salah, & Wright, Jeff R. (1992). Multiple subregion allocation models. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 118(1), 24-40. 10. Briers, Robert A. (2002). Incorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures. Biological conservation, 103(1), 77-83. 11. Brooks, Thomas, Fonseca, DA, AB, GUSTAVO, & RODRIGUES, ANA SL. (2004). Species, data, and conservation planning. Conservation Biology, 18(6), 1682-1688. 12. Bruner, Aaron G, Gullison, Raymond E, Rice, Richard E, & Da Fonseca, Gustavo AB. (2001). Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science, 291(5501), 125-128. 13. Cabeza, Mar. (2003). Habitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve design. Ecology Letters, 6(7), 665-672. 14. Cabeza, Mar, Araujo, Miguel B, Wilson, Robert J, Thomas, Chris D, Cowley, Matthew JR, & Moilanen, Atte. (2004). Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design. Journal of applied ecology, 41(2), 252-262. 15. Camm, Jeffrey D, Polasky, Stephen, Solow, Andrew, & Csuti, Blair. (1996). A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection. Biological Conservation, 78(3), 353-355. 16. Carwardine, J, Rochester, WA, Richardson, KS, Williams, Kristen J, Pressey, RL, & Possingham, HP. (2007). Conservation planning with irreplaceability: does the method matter? Biodiversity and Conservation, 16(1), 245-258. 17. Carwardine, Josie, Wilson, Kerrie A, Watts, Matt, Etter, Andres, Klein, Carissa J, & Possingham, Hugh P. (2008). Avoiding costly conservation mistakes: the importance of defining actions and costs in spatial priority setting. PLoS One, 3(7), e2586. 18. Cocks, KD, & Baird, Ian A. (1989). Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: an example from the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Biological Conservation, 49(2), 113-130. 19. Connolly, David T. (1990). An improved annealing scheme for the QAP. European Journal of Operational Research, 46(1), 93-100. 20. Csuti, Blair, Polasky, Stephen, Williams, Paul H, Pressey, Robert L, Camm, Jeffrey D, Kershaw, Melanie, . . . Huso, Manuela. (1997). A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biological Conservation, 80(1), 83-97. 21. Davis, Frank W, Costello, Christopher, & Stoms, David. (2006). Efficient conservation in a utility-maximization framework. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 33. 22. Davis, Frank W, Stoms, David M, & Andelman, Sandy. (1999). Systematic reserve selection in the USA: an example from the Columbia Plateau ecoregion. Parks, 9(1), 31-41. 23. Delavenne, Juliette, Metcalfe, Kristian, Smith, Robert J, Vaz, Sandrine, Martin, Corinne S, Dupuis, Ludovic, . . . Carpentier, Andre. (2012). Systematic conservation planning in the eastern English Channel: comparing the Marxan and Zonation decision-support tools. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 69(1), 75-83. 24. Faith, Daniel P. (1994). Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 345(1311), 45-58. 25. Faith, Daniel P, Ferrier, S, & Walker, PA. (2004). The ED strategy: how species‐level surrogates indicate general biodiversity patterns through an ‘environmental diversity’perspective. Journal of Biogeography, 31(8), 1207-1217. 26. Fernandes, Leanne, Day, JON, Lewis, Adam, Slegers, Suzanne, Kerrigan, Brigid, Breen, DAN, . . . Lowe, Dave. (2005). Establishing Representative No‐Take Areas in the Great Barrier Reef: Large‐Scale Implementation of Theory on Marine Protected Areas. Conservation Biology, 19(6), 1733-1744. 27. Ferrier, Simon, & Guisan, Antoine. (2006). Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level. Journal of applied ecology, 43(3), 393-404. 28. Ferrier, Simon, Pressey, Robert L, & Barrett, Thomas W. (2000). A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement. Biological Conservation, 93(3), 303-325. 29. Fischer, Douglas T, & Church, Richard L. (2003). Clustering and compactness in reserve site selection: an extension of the biodiversity management area selection model. Forest Science, 49(4), 555-565. 30. Fuller, Trevon, Munguia, Mariana, Mayfield, Michael, Sanchez-Cordero, Victor, & Sarkar, Sahotra. (2006). Incorporating connectivity into conservation planning: a multi-criteria case study from central Mexico. Biological Conservation, 133(2), 131-142. 31. Garson, J, Aggarwal, A, & Sarkar, S. (2002). ResNet manual: Ver. 32. Gordon, Ascelin, Simondson, David, White, Matt, Moilanen, Atte, & Bekessy, Sarah Adine. (2009). Integrating conservation planning and landuse planning in urban landscapes. Landscape and urban planning, 91(4), 183-194. 33. Groves, Craig. (2003). Drafting a conservation blueprint: a practitioner's guide to planning for biodiversity: Island Press. 34. Hermoso, Virgilio, & Kennard, Mark J. (2012). Uncertainty in coarse conservation assessments hinders the efficient achievement of conservation goals. Biological Conservation, 147(1), 52-59. 35. Hill, Mark O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54(2), 427-432. 36. Hof, John G, & Raphael, Martin G. (1993). Some mathematical programming approaches for optimizing timber age-class distributions to meet multispecies wildlife population objectives. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23(5), 828-834. 37. Holzkamper, Annelie, Lausch, Angela, & Seppelt, Ralf. (2006). Optimizing landscape configuration to enhance habitat suitability for species with contrasting habitat requirements. ecological modelling, 198(3), 277-292. 38. Horn, Hannah L. (2011). Strategic conservation planning for terrestrial animal species in the Central Interior of British Columbia. Journal of Ecosystems and Management, 12(1). 39. Hosmer Jr, David W, & Lemeshow, Stanley. (2004). Applied logistic regression: John Wiley & Sons. 40. Howard, Peter C, Viskanic, Paolo, Davenport, Tim RB, Kigenyi, Fred W, Baltzer, Michael, Dickinson, Chris J, . . . Balmford, Andrew. (1998). Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature, 394(6692), 472-475. 41. Johnsingh, AJT, & Prasad, SN. S, P. Goyal. 1990. Conservation status of the Chila-Motichur Corridor for elephant movement in Rajaji-Corbett National Parks area, India. Biol. Conserv, 51, 125-138. 42. Johnson, Douglas H. (1980). The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology, 61(1), 65-71. 43. Kati, Vassiliki, Devillers, Pierre, Dufrene, Marc, Legakis, Anastasios, Vokou, Despina, & Lebrun, Philippe. (2004). Hotspots, complementarity or representativeness? Designing optimal small-scale reserves for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 120(4), 471-480. 44. Kelley, Chris, Garson, Justin, Aggarwal, Anshu, & Sarkar, Sahotra. (2002). Place prioritization for biodiversity reserve network design: a comparison of the SITES and ResNet software packages for coverage and efficiency. Diversity and Distributions, 8(5), 297-306. 45. Kershaw, M, Williams, PH, & Mace, GM. (1994). Conservation of Afrotropical antelopes: consequences and efficiency of using different site selection methods and diversity criteria. Biodiversity & Conservation, 3(4), 354-372. 46. Kirkpatrick, JB. (1983). An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation, 25(2), 127-134. 47. Kirkpatrick, Scott. (1984). Optimization by simulated annealing: Quantitative studies. Journal of statistical physics, 34(5-6), 975-986. 48. Klein, CJ, Chan, A, Kircher, L, Cundiff, AJ, Gardner, N, Hrovat, Y, . . . Airame, S. (2008). Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas. Conservation Biology, 22(3), 691-700. 49. Kremen, C., Cameron, A., Moilanen, A., Phillips, S. J., Thomas, C. D., Beentje, H., . . . Zjhra, M. L. (2008). Aligning conservation priorities across taxa in Madagascar with high-resolution planning tools. Science, 320(5873), 222-226. 50. Leathwick, J., Moilanen, A., Francis, M., Elith, J., Taylor, P., Julian, K., . . . Duffy, C. (2008). Novel methods for the design and evaluation of marine protected areas in offshore waters. Conservation Letters, 1(2), 91-102. 51. Leathwick, JR, Moilanen, A, Ferrier, S, & Julian, K. (2010). Complementarity-based conservation prioritization using a community classification, and its application to riverine ecosystems. Biological Conservation, 143(4), 984-991. 52. Leslie, Heather M. (2005). A synthesis of marine conservation planning approaches. Conservation Biology, 19(6), 1701-1713. 53. Leslie, Heather, Ruckelshaus, Mary, Ball, Ian R, Andelman, Sandy, & Possingham, Hugh P. (2003). Using siting algorithms in the design of marine reserve networks. Ecological Applications, 13(sp1), 185-198. 54. Lombard, AT, Nicholls, AO, & August, PV. (1995). Where should nature reserves be located in South Africa? A snake's perspective. Conservation Biology, 9(2), 363-372. 55. Magurran, Anne E, & Magurran, Anne E. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurement (Vol. 168): Springer. 56. Margules, Chris R, & Pressey, Robert L. (2000). Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405(6783), 243-253. 57. Margules, Chris, Sarkar, Sahotra, & Margules, CR. (2007). Systematic conservation planning: Cambridge University Press. 58. Margules, Christopher R, Nicholls, AO, & Pressey, RL. (1988). Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biological conservation, 43(1), 63-76. 59. McDonnell, Mark D, Possingham, Hugh P, Ball, Ian R, & Cousins, Elizabeth A. (2002). Mathematical methods for spatially cohesive reserve design. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 7(2), 107-114. 60. McGarigal, Kevin, & Marks, Barbara J. (1995). Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 61. Meir, Eli, Andelman, Sandy, & Possingham, Hugh P. (2004). Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world? Ecology Letters, 7(8), 615-622. 62. Mikkonen, Ninni, & Moilanen, Atte. (2013). Identification of top priority areas and management landscapes from a national Natura 2000 network. Environmental Science & Policy, 27, 11-20. 63. Moilanen, A., Leathwick, J., & Elith, J. (2008). A method for spatial freshwater conservation prioritization. Freshwater Biology, 53(3), 577-592. 64. Moilanen, Atte. (2007). Landscape zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: unifying reserve selection strategies. Biological Conservation, 134(4), 571-579. 65. Moilanen, Atte, Anderson, Barbara J, Eigenbrod, Felix, Heinemeyer, Andreas, Roy, David B, Gillings, Simon, . . . Thomas, Chris D. (2011). Balancing alternative land uses in conservation prioritization. Ecological Applications, 21(5), 1419-1426. 66. Moilanen, Atte, Franco, Aldina MA, Early, Regan I, Fox, Richard, Wintle, Brendan, & Thomas, Chris D. (2005). Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272(1575), 1885-1891. 67. Moilanen, Atte, Kujala, H, & Leathwick, J. (2009). The Zonation framework and software for conservation prioritization. Spatial Conservation Prioritization, 196-210. 68. Moilanen, Atte, Wilson, Kerrie A, & Possingham, Hugh Philip. (2009). Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools: Oxford University Press Oxford, UK. 69. Moilanen, Atte, & Wintle, Brendan A. (2007). The Boundary‐Quality Penalty: a Quantitative Method for Approximating Species Responses to Fragmentation in Reserve Selection. Conservation Biology, 21(2), 355-364. 70. Morrison, Michael L, Marcot, Bruce, & Mannan, William. (2006). Wildlife-habitat relationships: concepts and applications: Island Press. 71. Nicholls, AO, & Margules, Christopher R. (1993). An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biological Conservation, 64(2), 165-169. 72. Noss, Reed F. (1990). Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conservation biology, 4(4), 355-364. 73. Noss, Reed F, & Cooperrider, Allen. (1994). Saving nature's legacy: protecting and restoring biodiversity: Island Press. 74. Onal, Hayri, & Briers, Robert A. (2002). Incorporating spatial criteria in optimum reserve network selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1508), 2437-2441. 75. Onal, Hayri, & Briers, Robert A. (2006). Optimal selection of a connected reserve network. Operations Research, 54(2), 379-388. 76. Possingham, H, Wilson, KA, Andelman, SJ, & Vynne, CH. (2006). Protected areas: goals, limitations, and design. 77. Possingham, HP, Ball, Ian, & Andelman, Sandy. (2000). Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. Quantitative methods for conservation biology. Springer-Verlag, New York, 291-305. 78. Pressey, R. L. (1994). Ad Hoc Reservations - Forward or Backward Steps in Developing Representative Reserve Systems. Conservation Biology, 8(3), 662-668. 79. Pressey, RL, Humphries, CJ, Margules, Christopher R, Vane-Wright, RI, & Williams, PH. (1993). Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in ecology & evolution, 8(4), 124-128. 80. Pressey, RL, Johnson, IR, & Wilson, PD. (1994). Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodiversity & Conservation, 3(3), 242-262. 81. Pressey, RL, Possingham, HP, & Day, JR. (1997). Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biological Conservation, 80(2), 207-219. 82. Pressey, RL, & Tully, SL. (1994). The cost of ad hoc reservation: a case study in western New South Wales. Australian Journal of Ecology, 19(4), 375-384. 83. Rebelo, AG, & Siegfried, WR. (1990). Protection of fynbos vegetation: ideal and real-world options. Biological Conservation, 54(1), 15-31. 84. Rebelo, AG, & Siegfried, WR. (1992). Where should nature reserves be located in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa? Models for the spatial configuration of a reserve network aimed at maximizing the protection of floral diversity. Conservation Biology, 6(2), 243-252. 85. ReVelle, Charles S, Williams, Justin C, & Boland, John J. (2002). Counterpart models in facility location science and reserve selection science. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 7(2), 71-80. 86. Reyers, B, & Van Jaarsveld, AS. (2000). Assessment techniques for biodiversity surrogates. South African Journal of Science, 96(7). 87. Righton, D, & Mills, C. (2006). Application of GIS to investigate the use of space in coral reef fish: a comparison of territorial behaviour in two Red Sea butterflyfishes. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(2), 215-232. 88. Sarkar, Sahotra, Pappas, Christopher, Garson, Justin, Aggarwal, Anshu, & Cameron, Susan. (2004). Place prioritization for biodiversity conservation using probabilistic surrogate distribution data. Diversity and Distributions, 10(2), 125-133. 89. Sarkar, Sahotra, Pressey, Robert L, Faith, Daniel P, Margules, Christopher R, Fuller, Trevon, Stoms, David M, . . . Williams, Paul H. (2006). Biodiversity conservation planning tools: present status and challenges for the future. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 31, 123-159. 90. Schamberger, Melvin L, & O'Neil, L Jean. (1986). Concepts and constraints of habitat-model testing. 91. Schill, Steve, & Raber, George. (2006). USER MANUAL and TUTORIAL. Nature Conservancy, 2. 92. Schonewald-Cox, Christine M, & Bayless, Jonathan W. (1986). The boundary model: a geographical analysis of design and conservation of nature reserves. Biological Conservation, 38(4), 305-322. 93. Shogren, Jason F, & Hayward, Patricia H. (1997). Biological effectiveness and economic impacts of the Endangered Species Act. Land & Water L. Rev., 32, 531. 94. Smulders, Mary Catherine Alexandra. (2009). Spatial-temporal analysis of grizzly bear habitat use. University of Victoria. 95. Snyder, Stephanie A, Tyrrell, Lucy E, & Haight, Robert G. (1999). An optimization approach to selecting research natural areas in national forests. Forest science, 45(3), 458-469. 96. Soule, Michael E. (1987). Viable populations for conservation: Cambridge University Press. 97. Stewart, Romola R, & Possingham, Hugh P. (2005). Efficiency, costs and trade-offs in marine reserve system design. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 10(3), 203-213. 98. Stockwell, David RB, & Noble, Ian R. (1992). Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: a robust and informative method of data analysis. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 33(5), 385-390. 99. Stoms, David M, Davis, Frank W, Jenner, Mark W, Nogeire, Theresa M, & Kaffka, Stephen R. (2012). Modeling wildlife and other trade‐offs with biofuel crop production. GCB Bioenergy, 4(3), 330-341. 100. Summers, D. M., Bryan, B. A., Crossman, N. D., & Meyer, A. S. (2012). Species vulnerability to climate change: impacts on spatial conservation priorities and species representation (vol 18, pg 2335, 2012). Global Change Biology, 18(10), 3268-3268. 101. Thomas, C. D., Anderson, B. J., Moilanen, A., Eigenbrod, F., Heinemeyer, A., Quaife, T., . . . Gaston, K. J. (2013). Reconciling biodiversity and carbon conservation. Ecology Letters, 16, 39-47. 102. Tsuji, Nobuyuki, & Tsubaki, Yoshitaka. (2004). Three new algorithms to calculate the irreplaceability index for presence/absence data. Biological Conservation, 119(4), 487-494. 103. Vane-Wright, Richard I, Humphries, Chris J, & Williams, Paul H. (1991). What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological conservation, 55(3), 235-254. 104. Wenger, SETH J, Hagler, MEGAN M, & Freeman, BYRON J. (2009). Prioritizing areas of the Conasauga River sub-basin in Georgia and Tennessee for preservation and restoration. Paper presented at the Southeastern Fishes Council Proceedings. 105. Westphal, Michael I, Field, Scott A, & Possingham, Hugh P. (2007). Optimizing landscape configuration: a case study of woodland birds in the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81(1), 56-66. 106. Williams, Paul, Gibbons, David, Margules, Chris, Rebelo, Anthony, Humphries, Chris, & Pressey, Robert. (1996). A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conservation Biology, 10(1), 155-174. 107. Williams, PH. (2001). Complementarity. Encyclopedia of biodiversity, 1, 813-829. 108. Williams, PH, Moore, JL, Toham, A Kamden, Brooks, TM, Strand, H, D'Amico, J, . . . Rahbek, Carsten. (2003). Integrating biodiversity priorities with conflicting socio-economic values in the Guinean–Congolian forest region. Biodiversity & Conservation, 12(6), 1297-1320. 109. Willis, Christopher K, Lombard, Amanda T, Cowling, Richard M, Heydenrych, Barry J, & Burgers, Chris J. (1996). Reserve systems for limestone endemic flora of the Cape lowland fynbos: iterative versus linear programming. Biological Conservation, 77(1), 53-62. 110. Wilson, Edward O. (1999). The diversity of life: WW Norton & Company. 111. Wilson, Kerrie, Pressey, Robert L, Newton, Adrian, Burgman, Mark, Possingham, Hugh, & Weston, Chris. (2005). Measuring and incorporating vulnerability into conservation planning. Environmental management, 35(5), 527-543. 112. 王麗雯，2006。生物多樣性保護區網絡規劃－以台灣河川魚類為例。國立東華大學自然資源管理研究所碩士論文。 113. 吳海音, & 王麗雯. (2006). 生物多樣性保護區網絡規劃與不可取代性之探討-以台灣河川魚類為例. 114. 林大利. (2011). 破碎地景中鳥類群聚組成及棲地偏好. 國立台灣大學森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文. 115. 林貞瑋. (2006). 以領域描圖法研究梅峰地區繁殖鳥類密度. 國立台灣大學森林環境暨資源學系碩士論文. 116. 陳又綺. (2010). 梅峰地區四季景觀結構與鳥類群聚相關性之探討. 臺灣大學園藝學研究所學位論文, 1-79. 117. 陳俊德，2008。以空間分析模式劃設海洋、海岸保護區之研究－以高美濕地為例。國立中山大學海洋環境及工程學系研究所碩士論文。 118. 蕭維德. (2013). 農場尺度生物多樣性保育系統性優化規劃方法-以梅峰農場為例. 臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學研究所學位論文. 119. 張俊彥、林裕彬、張琪如、吳振發(譯)，2011。景觀量測。五南圖書出版社。(Leitao, A. B., Miller, J., Ahern, J., McGrigal, K. (2006). Measuring Landscapes: a planner’s Handbook) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/55042 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來因棲地破壞使得生物多樣性快速喪失，且生物多樣性之保育常與人類之經濟發展產生衝突，如何提高有限資源使用之效率及識別保育管理之區域為現今的重要課題。近二十年來，國際間諸多系統性保育規劃之軟體應用在保育決策之制定，研究不同方法的優缺與各決策工具之保育效益，必能使得保育工作更加完善，
本研究目的即為比較兩個目前在系統性保育規劃問題中最為廣泛使用的支援決策工具， Marxan與Zonation。研究區域位於南投縣之台大梅峰農場，利用區域內16隻具保育指標性鳥種做為目標物種，應用景觀指數與羅吉斯迴歸建立鳥類出現機率與棲地空間組成與配置與之關聯，作為保護區規劃之依據。探討Marxan與Zonation在梅峰案例中，不同保育情境下其邊緣控制參數之設定，即分析保護區優選結果之生物多樣性的保育成效。其中研究量化五項優選之評選要素:代表性、全面性、存續性、成本效益與不可取代性作為分析模式結果其保育成效。 研究結果顯示，梅峰地區之保育區規劃案例其Zonation之Boundary Length Penalty(BLP)範圍應介於 至 ，而Marxan之Boundary Length Modifier(BLM)範圍應介於 至 ;Marxan之邊緣控制參數設定上，過高之邊緣參數控制會大幅提升其選取面積，而造成保育效率降低，Zonation之邊緣參數設定應採用較低之邊緣控制參數作為保育區劃設之參考;整體來說，兩模式在全面性及代表性表現皆良好，而Zonation在五項之評選要素皆表現較佳，本研究建議採用Zonation作為梅峰地區之保育區規劃決策工具，Zonation之結果不僅可兼顧研究區域之生態價值與生物多樣性與保育區之空間配置，其結果也具有較高之保育效率;結果顯示北方天然林與東方天然林與果園交界區為梅峰地區具有高生態保育價值之地區，代表在資源有限時，此兩區為保育效益最大之區域，此外，目標物種比例高且邊緣長度權重大時之結果指出，西方區域還為不可取代性相當低之區域，保育效益最差。以本研究為例，利用量化之方法劃設保護區，比起一般質化方法更有效率，能在有限的空間下保育最大的生態資源，另外，國內以生物多樣性為保育目標應用系統性保育規劃方法文獻相當少，本研究提供此系統方法之應用及驗證，且提供兩模式在劃設保育區之空間特性，以期本研究成果未來可以做為提供棲地保育規劃者選取工具之依據，提升保育策略的效率與永續性，提供未來國土及區域規劃研究及實務之參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Biodiversity has been rapidly lost in recent years due to destruction of habitat. Biodiversity conservation and economic growth often conflict, and conservation resources that can be used are often limited. Therefore, a key issue of biodiversity conservation is how to improve the efficiency of limited resources and identify where conservation management are needed. A number of systematic conservation planning tools are available to aid in making land use decisions. It is essential that methodological differences and their potential effect on conservation planning outcomes are understood.
In this study, we utilize two commonly used decision-support tools, Marxan and Zonation, to identify a conservation planning for maintaining biodiversity of 16 birds at the Meifeng Highlands Experiment Farm of National Taiwan University in Nantou. We calculated the Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) for each bird by logistic regression, and selected the species which are representative in regression analysis as target species. Marxan and Zonation analyses were carried out using different Boundary Length parameters and conservation targets. Moreover, we apply representativeness, comprehensiveness, connectivity, cost- efficiency and irreplaceability as principles of quantifying conservation benefits for all analyses. Our results indicated that Boundary Length Penalty (BLP) of Zonation analyses are suggested to set from to and Boundary Length Modifier (BLM) of Marxan analyses are suggested to set to ; Marxan with high BLM value generally produced large reserve leading to ineffective results . Zonation results implied that low BLP value contribute to better perform. As a whole, both Marxan and Zonation generated representative and representative reserve appropriately and Zonation performed better in all principles. Based on our results, we suggested utilizing the results of Zonation for Meifeng conservation planning due to high biodiversity, optimal spatial configuration and high efficacy. The results revealed that northern and eastern natural forest and the edge areas of orchard are the areas with the largest conservation benefit; there are priority areas as reserve when resources limited. In addition, the western area has the least benefit and lowest irreplaceability in high conservation target and high boundary length parameter analyses. This study showed a case study of systematic conservation planning and different spatial characteristics; moreover, we proposed a quantifiable concept and provided the efficiently scheme for conservation planning. This result will be useful for future conservation planner to determine the appropriate decision-support tools. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:45:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R01622019-1.pdf: 2507979 bytes, checksum: 681c5b39c7e02d69d9422c8638ccaaf4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
目錄 V 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 1-1 研究動機 1 1-2 研究目的 3 1-3 研究流程 5 第二章 文獻回顧 8 2-1 生態保護區 8 2-1-1生態保育區概述與其重要性 8 2-1-2生態保育區定義與分類 8 2-1-3世界保育區發展現況 10 2-2保育區空間優選方法 11 2-2-1保育區空間優選步驟 11 2-2-2目標方程式與限制式 12 2-3保育區空間優選決策工具 14 2-3-1保育區空間優選工具介紹 14 2-3-2 系統性保育規劃模式Zonation 17 2-3-3 系統性保育規劃模式Marxan 20 2-4保育區空間優選之評選要素 22 2-4-1代表性與全面性(Representativeness and comprehensiveness) 23 2-4-2互補性(Complementarity) 24 2-4-3存續性(Persistence) 24 2-4-4成本效益(Cost- efficiency) 25 2-4-5威脅與脆弱度(Threat and vulnerability) 26 2-4-6不可取代性與選擇性(Irreplaceability and flexibility) 27 第三章 理論與方法 28 3-1研究區域與目標保育物種 28 3-1-1研究區域- 國立臺灣大學山地實驗農場梅峰場本部 28 3-1-2目標保育物種 29 3-2棲地適宜性分析 33 3-2-1棲地適宜性指數 33 3-2-2羅吉斯迴歸(Logistic Regression) 34 3-3保育區空間優選模式 35 3-3-1 Zonation 35 3-3-2 Marxan 40 3-3-3情境設計 42 3-4保育區空間優選之評選要素 43 第四章 結果與討論 48 4-1棲地適宜性分析 48 4-2保育區選取分析 49 4-2-1目標物種保育比例10%之保育區選取 50 4-2-3目標物種保育比例50%之保育區選取 66 4-2-4 綜合討論 73 第五章 結論與建議 76 5-1 結論 76 5-2 建議 79 參考文獻 80 附錄一 94 附錄二 97 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 全面性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 存續性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 成本效益 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 不可取代性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 保護區 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Zonation | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Marxan | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 系統性保育規劃 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 景觀生態指數 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 代表性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | comprehensiveness | en |
| dc.subject | Marxan | en |
| dc.subject | Zonation | en |
| dc.subject | landscape metrics | en |
| dc.subject | reserve | en |
| dc.subject | representativeness | en |
| dc.subject | systematic conservation planning | en |
| dc.subject | connectivity | en |
| dc.subject | cost- efficiency | en |
| dc.subject | irreplaceability | en |
| dc.title | 農場尺度生物多樣性保育區空間優選方法分析與比較-以梅峰農場為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Biodiversity conservation planning by two Spatial conservation prioritization tools at farm scale- A case study of Mei-Feng Farm | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 童慶斌(Ching-pin Tung),丁宗蘇(Tzung-Su Ding),李明旭(Ming-Hsu Li) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 系統性保育規劃,Marxan,Zonation,景觀生態指數,保護區,代表性,全面性,存續性,成本效益,不可取代性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | systematic conservation planning,Marxan,,Zonation,landscape metrics,reserve,representativeness,comprehensiveness,connectivity,cost- efficiency,irreplaceability, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 98 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-02-05 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物環境系統工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物環境系統工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.45 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。