Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 財務金融組
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54959
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor李存修
dc.contributor.authorWei-Bo Liuen
dc.contributor.author劉韋博zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T03:42:42Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-13
dc.date.copyright2015-03-13
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2015-02-11
dc.identifier.citation一、中文文獻
1.經濟部生技醫藥產業發展推動小組,2014,生技產業白皮書,中華民國經濟部工業局。
2.行政院科技顧問組,2009,台灣生技起飛鑽石行動方案行動計畫,中華民國行政院。
3.江雅鈴,2008,從生技新藥產業觀點探討大學之智慧財產管理,國立政治大學智慧財產研究所碩士論文。
4.林至洪、楊芳祝、劉盈吟、張麗晴與江雅鈴,2013,生物技術產業的智慧財產策略與管理-美國ZymoGenetics公司之個案研究,經濟部跨領域科技管理國際人才培訓計畫。
5.鄧哲明,2013,新藥的研發流程概論,科學月刊,第44卷第12期。
6.周延鵬,2010,智慧財產-全球行銷獲利聖經,台北:天下雜誌。
7.朱博湧,1999,競爭力取決於積極創新,遠見雜誌8月號第158期。
8.柯承恩,2008,商業模式與文化產業發展在台灣,經濟前瞻,118卷,104-112。
9.林素琴,2011,臺灣能源技術服務產業營運模式之分析,產業與管理論壇,1卷2期,78-89。
10.張孟元,2001,無形資產中技術價值影響因素與評估模式之研究-以資訊科技相關技術為例,政治大學資訊管理學系博士論文。
11.林紹凱,2001,實質選擇權評價模式於生化製藥業之應用,台灣大學國際企業學系研究所碩士論文。
12.魏德興,2004,選擇權法於技術移轉價值評估之研究-以環保光觸媒T技術移轉案為例,中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
13.吳思華,1988,產業政策與企業政策,中華經濟企業研究所。
14.林群倫,2008,生技製藥產業的價值創造模式-以APEX、NEXMED、BURRILL&COMPANY為例,政治大學智慧財產研究所碩士論文。
15.國研院科技政策研究與資訊中心,2014,由統計資料看人口老化問題,政策研究指標資料庫。
16.財團法人生物技術開發中心,2014,從全球細胞治療產業看台灣的發展契機,ITIS智網產業評析。
17.高啟明與王碧玲,2007,基因治療法的進展-以英國為例,國研院科技政策智庫。
18.周清邦、翁偉雄、楊若英與陳惠芳,2011,人體器官保存庫管理現況,食品藥物研究年報。
19.李元鳳,2006,細胞治療人體試驗之法規管理與國內現況,財團法人醫藥品查驗中心。
20.盧青佑與葉嘉新,2013,幹細胞治療產品的產業發展與法規研究,當代醫藥法規月刊第037期。
21.魏景成,2014,探討美國嚴重疾病用藥促進計畫,Connetome生醫網站

二、英文文獻
1.IMS Health Market Prognosis. 2013. Global Prescription Sales Information-Global Pharmaceutical Sales, 2003-2012. IMS Health.
2.IMS Health Data. 2009. “Patent Cliff”-Estimated Sales of Drugs with Expiring Patents. Fisher Investments Research.
3.IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. 2013. The Global Use of Medicines: Outlook through 2017. IMS Health.
4.Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. 2014. 2013 Novel New Drugs Summary. Food and Drug Administration, USA.
5.PhRMA Annual Report. 2014. 2014 Pharmaceutical Industry Research Profile. The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.
6.IMS Health MIDAS. 2013. Global Prescription Sales Information-Top 20 Global Products, 2013. IMS Health.
7.GPhA Annual Report. 2014. 2014 Generic Drug Savings in the U.S. Report. Generic Pharmaceutical Association.
8.Tufts CSDD. 2013. Outlook 2013. Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development.
9.Vernon, J.A. et al. 2009. Drug Development Costs when Financial Risk is Measured Using the Fama-French Three-factor Model. Health Economics, 19(8): 1002-1005.
10.OECD Annual Report. 2009. OECD Biotechnology Statistics 2009. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
11.Aggarwal, R.S. 2014. What's fueling the biotech engine-2012 to 2013. Nature Biotechnology, 32(1): 32-39.
12.Cooke, P., Kaufmann, D., Levin, C., & Wilson, R. 2006. The Biosciences Knowledge Value Chain and Comparative Incubation Models. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1): 115-129.
13.Hay, M., Thomas, D.W., Craighead, J.L., Economides, C., & Rosenthal, J. 2014. Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs. Nature Biotechnology, 32 (1): 40-51.
14.DiMasi, J.A., Feldman, L., Seckler, A. & Wilson, A. 2010. Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 87(3): 272-277
15.Kola, I. & Landis, J. 2004. Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nature Review Drug Discovery, 3(8): 711-715.
16.Morgan, S., Grootendorst, P., Lexchin, J., Cunningham, C. & Greyson D. 2011. The cost of drug development: A systematic review. Health Policy, 100(1): 4-17
17.Wu, L.C. & Wu, L.H. 2011. Pharmaceutical patent evaluation and licensing using a stochastic model and Monte Carlo simulations. Nature Biotechnology, 29(9): 798-801
18.Zaltman, G., Duncan, R. & Holbek, J. 1973. Innovations and Organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
19.Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
20.Christensan, C.M. & Raynor, M.E. 2003. The Innovator’s Solution:Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
21.Edvinsson, L. & Malone, M.S. 1997. Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower. Harper Business, New York, NY.
22.Roos, J., Roos, G., Dragonetti, N. C. & Edvinsson, L. 1998. Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape. New York: New York University Press.
23.Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C.K. 1990. The core competence of the corporations. Harvard Business Review, 68(3):79-91.
24.Chesbrough, H. W. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
25.Chesbrough, H. W. 2006. Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
26.Razgaitis, R. 1999. Early-Stage Technologies Valuation and Pricing. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
27.Stewart, J. J., Allison, P. N. & Johnson, R. S. 2001. Putting a price on biotechnology. Nature Biotechnology, 19: 5-9.
28.Bowman, E.H. & Moskowitz, G.T. 2001. Real Options Analysis and Strategic Decision Making. Organization Science, 12(6): 772-777.
29.Kellogg, D. & Charnes, J.M. 2000. Real-Options Valuation for a Biotechnology Company. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3): 76-84.
30.Daniel, D.R. 1961. Management Information Crisis. Harvard Business Review, 39(5): 111-121.
31.Aaker, D.A. 1984. Strategic Market Management. Humanities, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
32.Mendelson, D.N. & Schwartz, W.B. 1993. The Effects of Aging and Population Growth on Health Care Costs. Health Affairs, 12(1):119-125.
33.WHO Report. 2014. Noncommunicable Diseases Country Profiles 2014. World Health Organization.
34.CDC Report. 2014. Chronic Diseases: The Leading Causes of Death and Disability in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
35.Morris, PJ. 2004. Transplantation- A Medical Miracle of the 20th Century. N. Eng. J. Med. 351(26): 2678-2680.
36.Langer, R. & Vacanti, J.P. 1993. Tissue engineering. Science, 260:920–926
37.Kim, P.J., Dybowski, K.S. & Steinberg, J.S. 2006. A closer look at bioengineered alternative tissues. Podiatry Today, 19(7), 38–55.
38.Bello, Y.M., Falabella, A.F. & Eaglstein, W.H. 2001. Tissue-engineered skin. Current status in wound healing. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2(5), 305-313.
39.Kim, P.J., Heilala, M., Steinberg, J.S. & Weinraub, G.M. 2007. Bioengineered alternative tissues and hyperbaric oxygen in lower extremity wound healing. Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg. 24(3): 529-546.
40.Brittberg M., Lindahl, A., Nilsson, A., Ohlsson, C., Isaksson, O. & Peterson, L. 1994. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. New Engl. J. Med. 331:889-895.
41.Schachter, B. 2014. Therapies of the state. Nature Biotechnology, 32: 736-741.
42.ARM Annual Report. 2014. Regenerative Medicine Annual Industry Report 2014. Alliance for Regenerative Medicine.
43.Berdasco, M. & Esteller, M. 2011. DNA methylation in stem cell renewal and multipotency. Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 2:42.
44.Gatti, R., Meuwissen, H., Allen, H., Hong, R. & Good, R. 1968. Immunological reconstitution of sex-linked lymphopenic immunological deficiency. The Lancet 292:1366-1369.
45.Uccelli, A., Moretta, L. & Pistoia, V. 2006. Immunoregulatory function of mesenchymal stem cells. Eur J Immunol. 36(10): 2566-2573.
46.Le Blanc, K., Rasmusson, I., Sundberg, B., Gotherstrom, C., Hassan, M., Uzunel, M. & Ringden, O. 2004. Treatment of severe acute graft-versus-host disease with third party haploidentical mesenchymal stem cells. The Lancet 363(9419): 1439-1441.
47.Horwitz, E.M., Prockop, D.J., Fitzpatrick, L.A. & et al. 1999. Transplantability and therapeutic effects of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Med.5:309-313.
48.Thomson, J. A., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Shapiro, S. S. & et al. 1998. Embryonic stem cell lines derivedfrom human blastocysts. Science 282:1145-1147.
49.Ludwig, T. E., Levenstein, M. E., Jones, J. M., Berggren, W. T. & et al. 2006. Derivation of human embryonic stem cells in defined conditions. Nat. Biotechnol. 24:185-187.
50.Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. 2006. Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors. Cell, 126(4): 663-676.
51.Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M., Ichisaka, T., Tomoda, K. & et al. 2007. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell, 131(5): 861-872.
52.Wernig, M., Meissner, A., Foreman, R., Brambrink, T., Ku, M., Hochedlinger, K. & et al. 2007. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature, 448(7151): 318-324.
53.Cyranoski, D. 2014. Japanese woman is first recipient of next-generation stem cells. Nature News.
54.Blaese, R. M., Culver, K. W., Miller, A. D., Carter, C. S., Fleisher, T., Clerici, M. & et al. 1995. T lymphocyte-directed gene therapy for ADA deficiency SCID: Initial trial results after 4 years. Science 270:475-480.
55.Cavazzana-Calvo, M., Hacein-Bey, S., de Saint Basile, G., Gross, F., Yvon, E. & et al. 2000. Genetherapy of human severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)-X1 disease. Science 288:669-672.
56.Burger, L. & Hirschler, B. 2014. Exclusive: First gene therapy drug sets million-euro price record. Reuters News.
57.Dranoff, G. 2004. Cytokines in cancer pathogenesis and cancer therapy. Nature Reviews Cancer, 4(1): 11-22.
58.Maus, M.V., Grupp, S.A., Porter, D.L., June, C.H. 2014. Antibody-modified T cells:CARs take the front seat for hematologic malignancies. Blood, 123(17): 2625-2635.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54959-
dc.description.abstract「創新」是科技進步的主要動力來源,更是企業創造價值的關鍵能力,在全球市場邁入知識經濟的時代,高效率且持續不斷的創新,已成為產業技術領先及企業競爭優勢之重要因素。近年來諸多暢銷藥(Blockbuster)藥品專利陸續到期,加上各國政府為了降低整體醫療費用支出,紛紛鼓勵使用學名藥(Generic drugs),專利藥品銷售額往往在專利到期後隔年急遽下降,形成所謂的專利懸崖(Patent cliff)現象。然而,對生技製藥產業而言,持續性的研究開發與技術創新,並透過創新技術或產品取得專利保護,以確保產品成功上市後,能免於競爭而賺取超額利潤,才是生技製藥公司永續經營的重要關鍵因素。
細胞治療(Cell therapy)即是近年來相當熱門的新興生物技術,為再生醫學(Regenerative medicine)領域中最重要的一環,主要就是利用健康的細胞來進行修復、取代已受損或壞死的細胞以及因疾病、外傷而受損的組織或器官。儘管目前細胞治療技術或產品尚屬於萌芽階段,但對於創新效率不彰或能量飽和的大型製藥公司而言,極具潛力成為延續企業創新價值及突破專利懸崖窘境的利器。本研究主要透過新創公司Juno Therapeutics Inc.進行個案研究,探討生技製藥產業的創新技術如何創造價值,透過文獻比對瞭解細胞治療產業現況及未來的發展趨勢,藉由新創公司的商業營運模式進行架構分析,瞭解新興細胞治療領域之價值創造策略及模式,評估細胞治療產業是否有機會融入全球生技製藥產業價值鏈,成為創造營收的嶄新動能。
研究結果發現,個案透過公司核心能耐的轉化,形成其價值主張包含提供創新CAR及TCR技術、鎖定未被滿足的醫藥需求市場、緊密結合尖端臨床醫療機構以及客製化個人醫療產品及服務,作為細胞治療技術之價值創造策略。此外,藉由產業關鍵成功因素之掌握,個案以臨床試驗療效展現技術創新價值,同時經由對美國FDA審查時效及法規的高度熟稔,以滿足為未滿足的醫藥需求(Unmet medical need)市場,作為公司核心之價值創造模式。
研究結果也發現,細胞治療技術相當新穎,產品特性無法與現有藥物比擬,技術專利涵蓋範圍評價不易,創新技術的臨床試驗成效才是價值創造的重要關鍵。隨著再生醫學領域將朝細胞治療領邁進,整體市場價值將橫跨癌症標靶(Targeted)藥物及幹細胞藥物市場。根據IMS health統計,2013年癌症藥物市場約910美元,癌症標靶藥物約占46%,約418億美元,而由Visiongain研究指出,2016年全球幹細胞市場將達88.8億美元,意謂著全球細胞治療產業至少超過500億美元,細胞治療產業將改變再生醫學傳統模式並提升整體產業價值,成為全球生技製藥產業價值鏈創造營收的嶄新動能。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractInnovation would be the major driving force for industry evolution; moreover, it is the core competence for a corporate value creation, as global market towards knowledge-based economy, to have a high efficiency and continuous innovation become the key success factor for corporate to keep their competitive advantage and the capabilities of advanced technology among industry.
Recently, many blockbuster patents have expired, and governments have been encouraging the use of generic drugs in order to reduce overall healthcare cost, and this result to the phenomenon of Patent Cliff as patented drugs expired and the sales would be dramatically drops in the next year. However, to acquire patents through continuous R&D and technological innovation can be the most important element for biopharmaceutical industry to ensure they are able to gain from premium profit instead of competition while product launched.
Cell therapy is the emerging biotechnology and the most important part of regenerative medicine that utilize healthy cells to repair, replace damaged or necrotic cells and due to illness, injury and damaged tissues or organs. Although cell therapy technologies or products still belong infancy, it has a great potential to become the drive for the continuation of the value innovation and the breakthrough of patent cliff dilemma, especially in big pharma or startup biotech company.
In this study, a startup company, Juno Therapeutics Inc. has conducted as a case study to explore how innovative technologies in biopharmaceutical industry create values; this study also includes the status quo of the cell therapy industry and the views on future trends through literature review and various market research reports. An aim to comprehend the strategy and model of the value creation in the emerging cell therapy field via analyzing the business model of this startup case study, this analysis result can be used in cell therapy industry to increase revenue momentum and an assessment whether it’s an opportunity to integrate into the value chain of global biopharmaceutical industry or not.
From this case study, we found that the transformation of core competence would formulate its value proposition, which includes providing innovative CAR and TCR technology, focusing on the unmet medical needs market, collaborating closely with advanced clinical institutions, as well as customizing personal medical products and services, the value creation strategy of cell therapy technology would base on these moves.
In addition to the key success factors (KSFs) managed effectively, this case demonstrates technological innovation value via the efficiency of clinical trials, and familiar with the US FDA regulations and processes; to fulfill the unmet medical need markets, these are the KSFs for shaping this case company's value creation model.
We also found from this study that the cell therapy technology is lacking spec benchmarking reference base due to its too new to the market and hard to compare with the current products. Only the efficacy of clinical trials would dominate the key of industry success, which is the most important element to the value creation. Along with the regenerative medicine field towards cell therapy field, the market value will be crossing the targeted cancer and stem cell therapy market. According to the IMS health and Visiongain statistics, in 2013, the targeted cancer drug market was around $ 41.8 billion, and the stem cell market will reach $ 8.88 billion in 2016. It means the global cell therapy market will reach more than $50 billion and become the new momentum to generate revenue for global biopharmaceutical industry.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:42:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-104-P01745018-1.pdf: 2129808 bytes, checksum: 1e38340f1587f789a34ca22e8e41d023 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒 論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 3
第三節 研究架構與方法 4
第四節 研究範圍與限制 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 全球製藥產業發展概況 7
第二節 生技製藥產業創新價值鏈 14
第三節 創新技術之價值創造策略 23
第四節 智慧資本之價值評估模式 27
第五節 生技製藥產業創新技術之價值創造模式 33
第三章 細胞治療產業概況及市場分析 35
第一節 人口老化帶動再生醫學市場需求 35
第二節 創新細胞治療技術驅動市場新商機 41
第三節 全球細胞治療產業概況 55
第四章 細胞治療產業-個案研究 60
第一節 Juno Therapeutics Inc.價值創造策略 60
第二節 Juno Therapeutics Inc.價值創造模式 71
第三節 Juno Therapeutics Inc.之JCAR015評價試算 75
第五章 結論與建議 81
第一節 研究結論 81
第二節 研究建議 83
參考文獻 85
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject未被滿足的醫藥需求zh_TW
dc.subject價值創造模式zh_TW
dc.subject生技製藥zh_TW
dc.subject細胞治療zh_TW
dc.subject再生醫學zh_TW
dc.subject癌症免疫細胞療法zh_TW
dc.subjectValue Creation Modelen
dc.subjectUnmet Medical Needen
dc.subjectCancer Immunotherapyen
dc.subjectRegenerative Medicineen
dc.subjectCell Therapyen
dc.subjectBiopharmaceuticalen
dc.title生技製藥產業創新技術之價值創造模式-以新興細胞治療公司為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe Value Creation Models of Biopharmaceutical Industry
-The Case of a Cell Therapy Company
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear103-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee葉銀華,林姿婷
dc.subject.keyword價值創造模式,生技製藥,細胞治療,再生醫學,癌症免疫細胞療法,未被滿足的醫藥需求,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordValue Creation Model,Biopharmaceutical,Cell Therapy,Regenerative Medicine,Cancer Immunotherapy,Unmet Medical Need,en
dc.relation.page92
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2015-02-11
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept財務金融組zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:財務金融組

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-104-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.08 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved