請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54887
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 郭鐘金 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ya-chi Tu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 涂雅棋 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:40:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-12 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-03-12 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-02-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Anson LC, Chen PE, Wyllie DJ, Colquhoun D, Schoepfer R (1998) Identification of amino acid residues of the NR2A subunit that control glutamate potency in recombinant NR1/NR2A NMDA receptors. J Neurosci 18 (2):581-589
2. Armstrong CM (1971) Interaction of tetraethylammonium ion derivatives with the potassium channels of giant axons. The Journal of general physiology 58 (4):413-437 3. Ascher P (1990) Measuring and controlling the extracellular glycine concentration at the NMDA receptor level. Advances in experimental medicine and biology 268:13-16 4. Beck C, Wollmuth LP, Seeburg PH, Sakmann B, Kuner T (1999) NMDAR channel segments forming the extracellular vestibule inferred from the accessibility of substituted cysteines. Neuron 22 (3):559-570 5. Benveniste M, Clements J, Vyklicky L, Jr., Mayer ML (1990) A kinetic analysis of the modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors by glycine in mouse cultured hippocampal neurones. The Journal of physiology 428:333-357 6. Benveniste M, Mayer ML (1991) Kinetic-Analysis of Antagonist Action at N-Methyl-D-Aspartic Acid Receptors - 2 Binding-Sites Each for Glutamate and Glycine. Biophys J 59 (3):560-573 7. Benveniste M, Mienville JM, Sernagor E, Mayer ML (1990) Concentration-jump experiments with NMDA antagonists in mouse cultured hippocampal neurons. Journal of neurophysiology 63 (6):1373-1384 8. Berger AJ, Dieudonne S, Ascher P (1998) Glycine uptake governs glycine site occupancy at NMDA receptors of excitatory synapses. Journal of neurophysiology 80 (6):3336-3340 9. Blanke ML, VanDongen AM (2008) The NR1 M3 domain mediates allosteric coupling in the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Mol Pharmacol 74 (2):454-465. doi:10.1124/mol.107.044115 10. Boulter J, Hollmann M, O'Shea-Greenfield A, Hartley M, Deneris E, Maron C, Heinemann S (1990) Molecular cloning and functional expression of glutamate receptor subunit genes. Science 249 (4972):1033-1037 11. Carter PJ, Winter G, Wilkinson AJ, Fersht AR (1984) The Use of Double Mutants to Detect Structural-Changes in the Active-Site of the Tyrosyl-Transfer Rna-Synthetase (Bacillus-Stearothermophilus). Cell 38 (3):835-840 12. Chang HR, Kuo CC (2007) Characterization of the gating conformational changes in the felbamate binding site in NMDA channels. Biophys J 93 (2):456-466. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.098095 13. Chang HR, Kuo CC (2008) The activation gate and gating mechanism of the NMDA receptor. J Neurosci 28 (7):1546-1556. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3485-07.2008 14. Chang HR, Kuo CC (2008) Molecular determinants of the anticonvulsant felbamate binding site in the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Journal of medicinal chemistry 51 (6):1534-1545. doi:10.1021/jm0706618 15. Chen BS, Roche KW (2007) Regulation of NMDA receptors by phosphorylation. Neuropharmacology 53 (3):362-368. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.05.018 16. Chen GQ, Cui C, Mayer ML, Gouaux E (1999) Functional characterization of a potassium-selective prokaryotic glutamate receptor. Nature 402 (6763):817-821. doi:10.1038/45568 17. Chen PE, Geballe MT, Stansfeld PJ, Johnston AR, Yuan H, Jacob AL, Snyder JP, Traynelis SF, Wyllie DJ (2005) Structural features of the glutamate binding site in recombinant NR1/NR2A N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors determined by site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling. Molecular pharmacology 67 (5):1470-1484. doi:10.1124/mol.104.008185 18. Choi KL, Mossman C, Aube J, Yellen G (1993) The internal quaternary ammonium receptor site of Shaker potassium channels. Neuron 10 (3):533-541 19. Choi UB, Xiao S, Wollmuth LP, Bowen ME (2011) Effect of Src kinase phosphorylation on disordered C-terminal domain of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor subunit GluN2B protein. The Journal of biological chemistry 286 (34):29904-29912. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.258897 20. Clark GD, Clifford DB, Zorumski CF (1990) The Effect of Agonist Concentration, Membrane Voltage and Calcium on N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Desensitization. Neuroscience 39 (3):787-797. doi:Doi 10.1016/0306-4522(90)90261-2 21. Colquhoun D, Hawkes AG (1995) Desensitization of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors: a problem of interpretation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92 (22):10327-10329 22. Dingledine R, Borges K, Bowie D, Traynelis SF (1999) The glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol Rev 51 (1):7-61 23. Doyle DA, Morais Cabral J, Pfuetzner RA, Kuo A, Gulbis JM, Cohen SL, Chait BT, MacKinnon R (1998) The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science 280 (5360):69-77 24. Favre I, Moczydlowski E, Schild L (1996) On the structural basis for ionic selectivity among Na+, K+, and Ca2+ in the voltage-gated sodium channel. Biophys J 71 (6):3110-3125 25. Furukawa H, Gouaux E (2003) Mechanisms of activation, inhibition and specificity: crystal structures of the NMDA receptor NR1 ligand-binding core. The EMBO journal 22 (12):2873-2885. doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg303 26. Furukawa H, Singh SK, Mancusso R, Gouaux E (2005) Subunit arrangement and function in NMDA receptors. Nature 438 (7065):185-192. doi:nature04089 [pii] 10.1038/nature04089 27. Gloor P (1989) Epilepsy: relationships between electrophysiology and intracellular mechanisms involving second messengers and gene expression. The Canadian journal of neurological sciences Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques 16 (1):8-21 28. Gnegy ME (2000) Ca2+/calmodulin signaling in NMDA-induced synaptic plasticity. Critical reviews in neurobiology 14 (2):91-129 29. Hackos DH, Chang TH, Swartz KJ (2002) Scanning the intracellular S6 activation gate in the shaker K+ channel. J Gen Physiol 119 (6):521-532 30. Hidalgo P, MacKinnon R (1995) Revealing the architecture of a K+ channel pore through mutant cycles with a peptide inhibitor. Science 268 (5208):307-310 31. Hu B, Zheng F (2005) Differential effects on current kinetics by point mutations in the lurcher motif of NR1/NR2A receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 312 (3):899-904. doi:jpet.104.077388 [pii] 10.1124/jpet.104.077388 32. Hu B, Zheng F (2005) Molecular determinants of glycine-independent desensitization of NR1/NR2A receptors. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 313 (2):563-569. doi:10.1124/jpet.104.080168 33. Hynd MR, Scott HL, Dodd PR (2004) Glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Neurochemistry international 45 (5):583-595. doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2004.03.007 34. Imamura Y, Ma CL, Pabba M, Bergeron R (2008) Sustained saturating level of glycine induces changes in NR2B-containing-NMDA receptor localization in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Journal of neurochemistry 105 (6):2454-2465. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05324.x 35. Jiang Y, Lee A, Chen J, Cadene M, Chait BT, MacKinnon R (2002) Crystal structure and mechanism of a calcium-gated potassium channel. Nature 417 (6888):515-522. doi:10.1038/417515a 417515a [pii] 36. Johnson JW, Ascher P (1987) Glycine potentiates the NMDA response in cultured mouse brain neurons. Nature 325 (6104):529-531. doi:10.1038/325529a0 37. Jones KS, VanDongen HMA, VanDongen AMJ (2002) The NMDA receptor M3 segment is a conserved transduction element coupling ligand binding to channel opening. J Neurosci 22 (6):2044-2053 38. Karakas E, Furukawa H (2014) Crystal structure of a heterotetrameric NMDA receptor ion channel. Science 344 (6187):992-997. doi:10.1126/science.1251915 39. Kashiwagi K, Masuko T, Nguyen CD, Kuno T, Tanaka I, Igarashi K, Williams K (2002) Channel blockers acting at N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors: Differential effects of mutations in the vestibule and ion channel pore. Molecular Pharmacology 61 (3):533-545. doi:Unsp 1242/967812 40. Kashiwagi K, Masuko T, Nguyen CD, Kuno T, Tanaka I, Igarashi K, Williams K (2002) Channel blockers acting at N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors: differential effects of mutations in the vestibule and ion channel pore. Mol Pharmacol 61 (3):533-545 41. Kitaguchi T, Sukhareva M, Swartz KJ (2004) Stabilizing the closed S6 gate in the Shaker Kv channel through modification of a hydrophobic seal. J Gen Physiol 124 (4):319-332. doi:10.1085/jgp.200409098 jgp.200409098 [pii] 42. Klein RM, Howe JR (2004) Effects of the lurcher mutation on GluR1 desensitization and activation kinetics. J Neurosci 24 (21):4941-4951. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0660-04.2004 24/21/4941 [pii] 43. Kohda K, Wang Y, Yuzaki M (2000) Mutation of a glutamate receptor motif reveals its role in gating and delta2 receptor channel properties. Nature neuroscience 3 (4):315-322. doi:10.1038/73877 44. Krupp JJ, Vissel B, Heinemann SF, Westbrook GL (1996) Calcium-dependent inactivation of recombinant N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors is NR2 subunit specific. Mol Pharmacol 50 (6):1680-1688 45. Krupp JJ, Vissel B, Thomas CG, Heinemann SF, Westbrook GL (2002) Calcineurin acts via the C-terminus of NR2A to modulate desensitization of NMDA receptors. Neuropharmacology 42 (5):593-602 46. Kuner T, Seeburg PH, Guy HR (2003) A common architecture for K+ channels and ionotropic glutamate receptors? Trends in neurosciences 26 (1):27-32 47. Kuner T, Seeburg PH, Guy HR (2003) A common architecture for K+ channels and ionotropic glutamate receptors? Trends in Neurosciences 26 (1):27-32 48. Kuner T, Wollmuth LP, Karlin A, Seeburg PH, Sakmann B (1996) Structure of the NMDA receptor channel M2 segment inferred from the accessibility of substituted cysteines. Neuron 17 (2):343-352 49. Kuo CC, Hess P (1993) Characterization of the high-affinity Ca2+ binding sites in the L-type Ca2+ channel pore in rat phaeochromocytoma cells. The Journal of physiology 466:657-682 50. Kuo CC, Hess P (1993) Ion Permeation through the L-Type Ca2+ Channel in Rat Pheochromocytoma Cells - 2 Sets of Ion-Binding Sites in the Pore. J Physiol-London 466:629-655 51. Kuo CC, Lin BJ, Chang HR, Hsieh CP (2004) Use-dependent inhibition of the N-methyl-D-aspartate currents by felbamate: a gating modifier with selective binding to the desensitized channels. Molecular pharmacology 65 (2):370-380. doi:10.1124/mol.65.2.370 52. Kussius CL, Popescu GK (2010) NMDA receptors with locked glutamate-binding clefts open with high efficacy. J Neurosci 30 (37):12474-12479. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3337-10.2010 53. Laezza F, Doherty JJ, Dingledine R (1999) Long-term depression in hippocampal interneurons: joint requirement for pre- and postsynaptic events. Science 285 (5432):1411-1414 54. Lee CH, Lu W, Michel JC, Goehring A, Du J, Song X, Gouaux E (2014) NMDA receptor structures reveal subunit arrangement and pore architecture. Nature 511 (7508):191-197. doi:10.1038/nature13548 55. Legendre P, Rosenmund C, Westbrook GL (1993) Inactivation of Nmda Channels in Cultured Hippocampal-Neurons by Intracellular Calcium. J Neurosci 13 (2):674-684 56. Lester RAJ, Tong G, Jahr CE (1993) Interactions between the Glycine and Glutamate Binding-Sites of the Nmda Receptor. J Neurosci 13 (3):1088-1096 57. Lin F, Stevens CF (1994) Both Open and Closed Nmda Receptor Channels Desensitize. J Neurosci 14 (4):2153-2160 58. Low CM, Lyuboslavsky P, French A, Le P, Wyatte K, Thiel WH, Marchan EM, Igarashi K, Kashiwagi K, Gernert K, Williams K, Traynelis SF, Zheng F (2003) Molecular determinants of proton-sensitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor gating. Mol Pharmacol 63 (6):1212-1222. doi:10.1124/mol.63.6.1212 63/6/1212 [pii] 59. Lynch DR, Guttmann RP (2001) NMDA receptor pharmacology: perspectives from molecular biology. Curr Drug Targets 2 (3):215-231 60. MacDonald JF, Jackson MF, Beazely MA (2006) Hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity and signal amplification of NMDA receptors. Critical reviews in neurobiology 18 (1-2):71-84 61. Maki BA, Popescu GK (2014) Extracellular Ca2+ ions reduce NMDA receptor conductance and gating. The Journal of general physiology 144 (5):379-392. doi:10.1085/jgp.201411244 62. Mayer ML, Armstrong N (2004) Structure and function of glutamate receptor ion channels. Annu Rev Physiol 66:161-181. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.66.050802.084104 63. Mayer ML, Vyklicky L, Jr., Clements J (1989) Regulation of NMDA receptor desensitization in mouse hippocampal neurons by glycine. Nature 338 (6214):425-427. doi:10.1038/338425a0 64. Medina I, Filippova N, Charton G, Rougeole S, Benari Y, Khrestchatisky M, Bregestovski P (1995) Calcium-Dependent Inactivation of Heteromeric Nmda Receptor-Channels Expressed in Human Embryonic Kidney-Cells. J Physiol-London 482 (3):567-573 65. Michaelis EK (1998) Molecular biology of glutamate receptors in the central nervous system and their role in excitotoxicity, oxidative stress and aging. Prog Neurobiol 54 (4):369-415. doi:Doi 10.1016/S0301-0082(97)00055-5 66. Mody I, MacDonald JF (1995) NMDA receptor-dependent excitotoxicity: the role of intracellular Ca2+ release. Trends in pharmacological sciences 16 (10):356-359 67. Monyer H, Sprengel R, Schoepfer R, Herb A, Higuchi M, Lomeli H, Burnashev N, Sakmann B, Seeburg PH (1992) Heteromeric NMDA receptors: molecular and functional distinction of subtypes. Science 256 (5060):1217-1221 68. Moriyoshi K, Masu M, Ishii T, Shigemoto R, Mizuno N, Nakanishi S (1991) Molecular cloning and characterization of the rat NMDA receptor. Nature 354 (6348):31-37. doi:10.1038/354031a0 69. Murthy SE, Shogan T, Page JC, Kasperek EM, Popescu GK (2012) Probing the activation sequence of NMDA receptors with lurcher mutations. The Journal of general physiology 140 (3):267-277. doi:10.1085/jgp.201210786 70. Panchenko VA, Glasser CR, Mayer ML (2001) Structural similarities between glutamate receptor channels and K+ channels examined by scanning mutagenesis. Journal of General Physiology 117 (4):345-359 71. Ren H, Zhao Y, Wu M, Peoples RW (2013) A novel alcohol-sensitive position in the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor GluN2A subunit M3 domain regulates agonist affinity and ion channel gating. Mol Pharmacol 84 (4):501-510. doi:10.1124/mol.113.085993 72. Rison RA, Stanton PK (1995) Long-term potentiation and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors: foundations of memory and neurologic disease? Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 19 (4):533-552 73. Rosenmund C, Feltz A, Westbrook GL (1995) Calcium-dependent inactivation of synaptic NMDA receptors in hippocampal neurons. Journal of neurophysiology 73 (1):427-430 74. Rosenmund C, Stern-Bach Y, Stevens CF (1998) The tetrameric structure of a glutamate receptor channel. Science 280 (5369):1596-1599 75. Rosenmund C, Westbrook GL (1993) Calcium-Induced Actin Depolymerization Reduces Nmda Channel Activity. Neuron 10 (5):805-814. doi:Doi 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90197-Y 76. Salinska E, Lazarewicz JW (1996) NMDA receptor-mediated calcium fluxes in the hippocampus: relevance to ischemic brain pathology. Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska 30 Suppl 2:35-42 77. Sather W, Johnson JW, Henderson G, Ascher P (1990) Glycine-insensitive desensitization of NMDA responses in cultured mouse embryonic neurons. Neuron 4 (5):725-731. doi:0896-6273(90)90198-O [pii] 78. Schmidt C, Hollmann M (2008) Apparent homomeric NR1 currents observed in Xenopus oocytes are caused by an endogenous NR2 subunit. J Mol Biol 376 (3):658-670. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.11.105 79. Schoppa NE, Sigworth FJ (1998) Activation of Shaker potassium channels III. An activation gating model for wild-type and V2 mutant channels. Journal of General Physiology 111 (2):313-342 80. Sessoms-Sikes S, Honse Y, Lovinger DM, Colbran RJ (2005) CaMKIIalpha enhances the desensitization of NR2B-containing NMDA receptors by an autophosphorylation-dependent mechanism. Molecular and cellular neurosciences 29 (1):139-147. doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2005.01.006 81. Siegler Retchless B, Gao W, Johnson JW (2012) A single GluN2 subunit residue controls NMDA receptor channel properties via intersubunit interaction. Nature neuroscience 15 (3):406-413, S401-402. doi:10.1038/nn.3025 82. Sobolevsky AI, Koshelev SG, Khodorov BI (1999) Probing of NMDA channels with fast blockers. J Neurosci 19 (24):10611-10626 83. Sobolevsky AI, Rosconi MP, Gouaux E (2009) X-ray structure, symmetry and mechanism of an AMPA-subtype glutamate receptor. Nature 462 (7274):745-756. doi:nature08624 [pii] 10.1038/nature08624 84. Sommer B, Burnashev N, Verdoorn TA, Keinanen K, Sakmann B, Seeburg PH (1992) A glutamate receptor channel with high affinity for domoate and kainate. EMBO J 11 (4):1651-1656 85. Sornarajah L, Vasuta OC, Zhang L, Sutton C, Li B, El-Husseini A, Raymond LA (2008) NMDA receptor desensitization regulated by direct binding to PDZ1-2 domains of PSD-95. Journal of neurophysiology 99 (6):3052-3062. doi:10.1152/jn.90301.2008 86. Sun YM, Favre I, Schild L, Moczydlowski E (1997) On the structural basis for size-selective permeation of organic cations through the voltage-gated sodium channel. Effect of alanine mutations at the DEKA locus on selectivity, inhibition by Ca2+ and H+, and molecular sieving. The Journal of general physiology 110 (6):693-715 87. Sur C, Kinney GG (2007) Glycine transporter 1 inhibitors and modulation of NMDA receptor-mediated excitatory neurotransmission. Current drug targets 8 (5):643-649 88. Tu YC, Kuo CC (2014) The differential contribution of GluN1 and GluN2 to the gating operation of the NMDA receptor channel. Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology. doi:10.1007/s00424-014-1630-z 89. Vissel B, Krupp JJ, Heinemann SF, Westbrook GL (2002) Intracellular domains of NR2 alter calcium-dependent inactivation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Mol Pharmacol 61 (3):595-605. doi:Unsp 1330/966217 Doi 10.1124/Mol.61.3.595 90. Vyklicky L (1993) Calcium-Mediated Modulation of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (Nmda) Responses in Cultured Rat Hippocampal-Neurons. J Physiol-London 470:575-600 91. Watanabe J, Beck C, Kuner T, Premkumar LS, Wollmuth LP (2002) DRPEER: a motif in the extracellular vestibule conferring high Ca2+ flux rates in NMDA receptor channels. J Neurosci 22 (23):10209-10216. doi:22/23/10209 [pii] 92. Watanabe J, Beck C, Kuner T, Premkumar LS, Wollmuth LP (2002) DRPEER: A motif in the extracellular vestibule conferring high Ca2+ flux rates in NMDA receptor channels. J Neurosci 22 (23):10209-10216 93. Wo ZG, Oswald RE (1995) A topological analysis of goldfish kainate receptors predicts three transmembrane segments. The Journal of biological chemistry 270 (5):2000-2009 94. Xu M, Smothers CT, Trudell J, Woodward JJ (2012) Ethanol inhibition of constitutively open N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 340 (1):218-226. doi:10.1124/jpet.111.187179 95. Yuan H, Erreger K, Dravid SM, Traynelis SF (2005) Conserved structural and functional control of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor gating by transmembrane domain M3. J Biol Chem 280 (33):29708-29716. doi:M414215200 [pii] 10.1074/jbc.M414215200 96. Zarei MM, Dani JA (1994) Ionic permeability characteristics of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor channel. The Journal of general physiology 103 (2):231-248 97. Zheng J, Sigworth FJ (1998) Intermediate conductances during deactivation of heteromultimeric Shaker potassium channels. J Gen Physiol 112 (4):457-474 98. Zhu S, Stroebel D, Yao CA, Taly A, Paoletti P (2013) Allosteric signaling and dynamics of the clamshell-like NMDA receptor GluN1 N-terminal domain. Nature structural & molecular biology 20 (4):477-485. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2522 99. Zuo J, De Jager PL, Takahashi KA, Jiang W, Linden DJ, Heintz N (1997) Neurodegeneration in Lurcher mice caused by mutation in delta2 glutamate receptor gene. Nature 388 (6644):769-773. doi:10.1038/42009 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54887 | - |
dc.description.abstract | NMDA離子通道分別是由兩個GluN1和兩個GluN2所組成,然而這兩個不同的次單元在通道上的貢獻還不是很清楚。我們發現glycine對GluN1的親和力(K gly ∼ 0.6 μM)明顯高於NMDA或glutamate對GluN2的親和力(K NMDA ∼ 36 μM, K glu ∼ 4.8 μM)。然而Glycine對GluN1的結合速度(∼9.8 × 106 M-1 s-1) 稍為快於NMDA 對 GluN2 (∼4.1 × 106 M-1 s-1)。Glycine從GluN1離開結合位的速度(time constant ∼2 s)明顯慢於NMDA從GluN2離開結合位的速度(time constant ∼70 ms)。除此之外,同時洗掉glycine和NMDA的NMDA通道decay速度和NMDA離開結合位的速度相似。但是如果只洗掉glycine,NMDA通道decay速度明顯變慢,且和glycine離開結合位相似。在缺乏給予NMDA的情況下,glycine的結合速度對於離開結合位的通道,大概和共同給予NMDA和glycine相似。然而在缺乏給予glycine下的NMDA結合速度明顯變慢。另外,NMDA離子通道的GluN1和GluN2上有一段保留序列SYTANLAAF,其第七個胺基酸A7在GluN1和GluN2上非常靠近可以控制外口的大小。除此之外,突變在GluN1的A7可以改變glycine和NMDA對離子通道的親和力,但在GluN2則只有影響NMDA對通道的親和力。因此,GluN2是負責活化的門閥,而GluN1扮演調控門閥的角色。結構上,調控次單元似乎是透過A7的胺基酸。
除此之外,NMDA對於鈣離子有相當高的通透性,而鈣離子的通透會影響許多細胞生物的性質。NMDA具有鈣離子依賴性的去敏感性,而目前研究顯示鈣離子和胞內的calcineurin等物質會交互作用產生鈣離子依賴性的去敏感性,然而由於在外口也有鈣離子的結合位,鈣離子是否也會在外口作用,產生鈣離子依賴性的去敏感性。我們發現在外口的鈣離子和鉻離子(和鈣離子有相同價電子數和半徑)會結合到休息態的NMDA而影響門閥的開關。由於活化門閥位於外口處,這些離子的結合位應該處於更外口的地方。根據我們結果顯示鉻離子鉻離子對通道是一對一的結合,其對休息態,活化態,去敏感態的親和力分別為分別為~5, ~2.5, and ~1.2 μM。DRPEER motif(在GluN1而不在GluN2)位於活化門閥的外面,當DEE突變成Alanine時則Cd離子的親和力無論是休息態或是活化態會下降,因此鈣或鉻離子可能透過DRPEER motif進而影響活化門閥,鈣或鉻離子的抑制能力在T647A突變也會下降,且會產生明顯的hook電流,暗示這突變的通道只有休息態和活化態,沒有去敏感態,也暗示去敏感態和conformational的改變有關。 另一方面,去敏感態在NMDA扮演重要的角色,目前切確的調控機轉仍然未知,我們發現tetrapentylammonium (TPentA)接在外口會有gating modify的角色,使通道喜歡待在開啟的裝態,而不喜歡待在去敏感態。另外SYTANLAAF在gating上也扮演很重要的角色,像是A7或是T3突變之後對desensitization都有嚴重的影響,暗示desensitization是一種結構上的改變,而且可能就在活化閘門A7的附近。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The NMDA receptor channel is an obligatory heterotetramer formed by two GluN1 and two GluN2 subunits. However, the differential contribution of the two different subunits to channel operation is not clear. We found that the apparent affinity of glycine to GluN1 (Kgly~0.6 μM) is much higher than NMDA or glutamate to GluN2 (KNMDA~36 μM, Kglu~4.8 μM). The binding rate constant (derived from the linear regression of the apparent macroscopic binding rates) of glycine to GluN1 (~9.8 x 106 M-1s-1), however, is only slightly faster than NMDA to GluN2 (~4.1 x 106 M-1s-1). Accordingly, the apparent unbinding rates of glycine from activated GluN1 (time constant ~2s) are much slower than NMDA from activated GluN2 (time constant ~70 ms). Moreover, the decay of NMDA currents upon wash-off of both glycine and NMDA seems to follow the course of NMDA rather than glycine unbinding. But if only glycine is washed off, the current decay is much slower, apparently following the course of glycine unbinding. The apparent binding rate of glycine to the fully deactivated channel, in the absence of NMDA, is roughly the same as that measured with co-application of both ligands, whereas the apparent binding rate of NMDA to the fully deactivated channel in the absence of glycine is markedly slower. In this regard, it is interesting that the 7th residue in the highly conserved SYTANLAAF motif (A7) in GluN1 and GluN2 are so close that they may interact with each other to control the dimension of the external pore mouth. Moreover, specific mutations involving A7 in GluN1 but not in GluN2 result in channels showing markedly enhanced affinity to both glycine and NMDA and readily activated by only NMDA, as if the channel is already partially activated. We conclude that GluN2 is most likely directly responsible for the activation gate of the NMDA channel, whereas GluN1 assumes a role of more global control, especially on the gating conformational changes in GluN2. Structurally, this inter-subunit regulatory interaction seems to involve the SYTANLAAF motif, especially the A7 residue.
Furthermore, the NMDA receptor channel is characterized by its high permeability of Ca2+ ion, and the Ca2+ influxes may play an important role in many cellular physiological and pathophysiological processes. It has been reported that NMDA channel desensitization, an imperative attribute regulating ionic fluxes through the channel pore, could be related to Ca2+ ions flowing through the pore and/or interacting with effector proteins such as calcineurin at the internal pore mouth. Whether extracellular Ca2+ ion itself could directly bind to the NMDA receptor channel to have an effect on the key molecular behaviors of the channel has not been fully characterized. We found that extracellular Ca2+ and Cd2+, an ion with the same charges and ionic radius as Ca2+ and therefore high affinity toward many Ca2+ binding sites, could bind to the closed NMDA channel to affect channel gating as well as ion permeation. Because the activation gate, which is already positioned at the external pore mouth, is not open, this binding site must be located at the very external part of the pore. We also demonstrated that Cd2+ binds to the NMDA channel with a simple bimolecular reaction, and the apparent dissociation constants toward the closed, open, and desensitized states of the channel is ~5, ~2.5, and ~1.2 μM, respectively. The modest but definite differential affinity would indicate that the binding site changes its conformation during the gating process. DRPEER, a motif in the GluN1 but not GluN2 subunit, is located just external to the activation gate of the NMDA channel. Interestingly, the effect of Cd2+ present in either the resting or the activated state is decreased correlatively to the number of charge-neutralization mutations in this motif, with additive free energy changes calculated by double mutant cycle analysis. DRPEER motif therefore very likely constitutes the binding site for Ca2+ or Cd2+, and thus seems to go through a sequential conformational change during channel activation. In this regard, it is intriguing that the inhibitory effect of Cd2+ is also decreased by point mutation T647A located just inside the activation gate in the pore. Moreover, prominent “hooked” current develops after wash-off of Cd2+ (and even more so after wash-off of Ca2+) in this case, suggesting preservation of the channel in the open state (prevention of the channel from entering the desensitized state) and thus an apparently inversed order of affinity of Cd2+ and Ca2+ toward the two states with the point mutation. Desensitization thus seems to involve essential conformational changes in the vicinity of the activation gate in the NMDA channel. Desensitization is an important gating mechanism for the function of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. However, the exact modulation of desensitization mechanism remains in question. We found that extracellular tetrapentylammonium (TPentA) binds to the external pore mouth, and induces a strong increase in open probability to disturb the equivalence between open and desensitization states. TpentA seems to prefer to open state of the NMDA channel. Moreover, the A7 residues (at position 7 of the SYTANLAAF motif), shown to mark the activation gate, constitute the key component of the activation gate of the NMDA channel. We further explore whether A7 is also involved in the desensitization. Our data suggest that the desensitization gate should be near the activation gate, A7, in the external pore mouth. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:40:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-F95441005-1.pdf: 3295590 bytes, checksum: 2b6ed40fcd8b92e4eb991c2bca76caa2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgement 2
Abstract in Chinese (中文摘要) 3 Abstract 5 Chapter 1 The Differential Contribution of GluN1 and GluN2 to the Gating Operation of the NMDA Receptor Channel 8 1.1 Introduction 8 1.2 Materials and Methods 10 1.3 Results 14 1.4 Discussion 24 1.5 Figures 30 Chapter 2 Modulation of NMDA Channel Gating and Ion Conduction by Cd2+ and Ca2+ Binding to the External Pore Mouth 49 2.1 Introduction 49 2.2 Materials and Methods 51 2.3 Results 56 2.4 Discussion 62 2.5 Figures 66 Chapter 3 Desensitization Mechanism Is Modulated by the External Pore Mouth of the NMDA Receptor Channel 82 3.1 Introduction 82 3.2 Materials and Methods 84 3.3 Results 87 3.4 Discussion 94 3.5 Figures 97 References 110 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | NMDA離子通道之門閥調控機轉 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Gating Mechanism of the NMDA Receptor Channel | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊雅晴,湯志永,蔡明正,黃榮棋,劉天申 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 離子通道, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | NMDA receptor, | en |
dc.relation.page | 118 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-02-13 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生理學科所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.22 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。