Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 法律學院
  3. 法律學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54771
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor曾宛如(Wang-Ruu Tseng)
dc.contributor.authorYu-Hsiang Chengen
dc.contributor.author鄭育翔zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T03:38:12Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-11
dc.date.copyright2015-08-11
dc.date.issued2015
dc.date.submitted2015-03-30
dc.identifier.citation王文宇(2005),設立獨立董監事對公司治理之影響,法令月刊,56卷1期,頁45-64。
王文宇(2008),公司法論,4版,臺北:元照。
王志誠(1998),論公司員工參與經營之制度—以股份有限公司經營機關之改造為中心,國立政治大學法律學研究所博士論文。
王志誠(2005),我國公司治理之實務發展及檢討—以並列制經營機關之改革為中心,收於:賴英照大法官六秩華誕祝賀論文集委員會編,現代公司法制之新課題:賴英照大法官六秩華誕祝賀論文集,頁371-395,臺北:元照。
王泰銓(2008),歐洲聯盟法總論,臺北:臺灣智庫。
王泰銓(2009),歐洲事業法(一):歐洲公司企業組織法,2版,臺北:五南。
沈宜玲(2003),我國與德國勞工董事制度之比較研究,中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
林仁光(2004),公司治理之理論與實踐—經營者支配或股東支配之衝突與調整,臺大法學論叢,33卷3期,頁201-279。
林更盛(2004),德國法上勞工參與決定制度—背景、現況與合憲性,收於:勞動基本權 學術研討會論文集,頁455-474。
林佳和,黃世鑫主持(2004),勞工董事制度之理論與實務,行政院勞工委員會委託研究報告。
林國全(2013),公司治理法制,月旦民商法雜誌第39期,頁6-8。
邵慶平(2008),論股東會與董事會之權限分配—近年來公司修正之反思,收於:公司法—組織與契約之間,頁111-166,臺北:邵慶平出版。
邵慶平(2008),論股東會與董事會權限分配法制的比較—以CA v. AFSCME為中心,收於:公司法—組織與契約之間,頁217-239,臺北:邵慶平出版。
翁林聖(2006),企業員工參與制度之研究,國立政治大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
張心悌(2005),股東提案權之省思—兼以代理成本與Arrow定理觀察之,收於:賴英照大法官六秩華誕祝賀論文集編輯委員會編,現代公司法制之新課題─賴英照大法官六秩華誕祝賀論文集,頁279-308,臺北:元照。
郭玲惠(1997),產業民主制度所涉及的法律問題—兼簡介德國之制度,中興法學,43期,頁127-156。
陳彥良(2006),股東會、董事會、監事會於德國公司治理法典中法規範地位探討,政大法學評論,89期,頁143-187。
陳彥良(2007),公司治理法制—公司內部機關組織職權論,臺灣:翰蘆。
陳彥良(2008),企業社會責任與公司治理於股份有限公司中交錯實踐之可行性—德國股份法中企業利益對董事會職權影響之初探—,台灣法學雜誌,111期,頁49-72。
陳彥良(2009),公司治理面向下共同決定之探討—德國法的啓示,財產法暨經濟法雜誌,17期,頁41-92。
陳麗娟(2006),從美國法與德國法股份有限公司董事會之規定論我國股份有限公司董事會之組織架構,高大法學論叢,2卷1期,頁115-146。
陳麗娟(2009),從「德國公司治理規約」看該國公司治理改革,收於:全球化之公司治理,頁53-70,臺北:五南。
曾宛如(2008),我國公司治理(一)我國公司治理之省思,收於:公司管理與資本市場法制專論(二),頁159-186,臺北:元照。
曾宛如(2011),少數股東之保護—自多數股東行使表决權之界限觀察,收於:公司法制基礎理論之再建構,頁159-186,臺北:承法。
曾宛如(2011),少數股東之保護—自股東會之程序設計及董事會之干擾觀察,收於:公司法制基礎理論之再建構,頁93-156,臺北:承法。
曾宛如(2011),章程自治之範疇,收於:公司法制基礎理論之再建構,頁61-89,臺北:承法。
曾宛如(2013),影子董事與關係企業—多數股東權行使界限之另一面向,政大法學評論,頁3。
黃銘傑(2006),公司法制修正之背景因素與基礎理論,收於:公司治理與企業金融法制之挑戰與興革,頁3-31,臺北:元照。
楊岳平(2010),論我國企業併購法至與利害關係人之保護—由公司社會責任理論出發,國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
楊通軒(2007),集體勞工法理論與實務,臺北:五南。
葉新民(2013),由德國員工參與法制探討我國員工獎勵制度的相關法律問題—以公司法為中心,臺北大學法學論叢,88期,頁135-208。
劉士豪(2013),我國勞工董事法律地位之探討,台灣勞工季刊,34期,頁24-38。
劉建宏(2011),從公司治理與企業社會責任探討勞工參與之法制化,國立中正大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
劉連煜(2010),現代公司法,6版,臺北:新學林。
劉連煜(2012),新證券交易法實例研習,增訂10版,臺北:元照。
蔡沛珊(2009),從比較法觀點論我國勞工董事制度,國立成功大學法律學系碩士論文。
衛民(2002),從德國共同決定制度論我國勞工董事制度的定位,政大勞動學報,12期,頁219-255。
賴英照(2007),從尤努斯到巴菲特—公司社會責任的基本問題—,台灣本土法學雜誌,93期,頁150-180。
Andenas, Mads, and Frank Wooldridge. 2009. European Comparative Company Law. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Attenborough, Daniel. 2013. Andrew Keay’s The Enlightened Shareholder Value Principle and Corporate Governance. Modern Law Review 76:940-943.
Avi-Yonah, Reuven S. 2005. The Cyclical Transformations of the Corporate Form: A Historical Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 30:767-818.
Bainbridge, Stephen M. 2002. Corporation Law and Economics. New York, NY: Foundation Press.
Bebchuk, Lucian, and Mark Roe. 2004. A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance, Pp. 69-113 in Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, edited by Jeffrey N. Gordon & Mark J. Roe.
Blair, Margaret M. 1999. Firm-Specific Human Capital and Theories of the Firm. Pp. 58-90 in Employees and Corporate Governance, edited by Margaret M. Blair and Mark J. Roe. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Blum, Albert A. 2003. A History of the American Labor Movement. American Historical Association.
Bodie, Matthew T. 2007. Workers, Information, and Corporate Combinations: The Case for Nonbinding Employee Referenda for Transformative Transactions. Washington University Law Review 85:871-929.
Bodie, Matthew T. 2010. The Case for Employee Referenda on Transformative Transactions As Shareholder Proposals. Washington University Law Review 87:897-905.
Cahn, Andreas, and David C. Donald. 2010. Comparative Company Law Text and Cases on the Governing Corporation in Germany, the UK and the USA. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Chartier, Gary. 2009. Economic Justice and Natural Law. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, Ronald Oliver, Derek John Fatchett and Benjamin Charles Roberts. 1972. Workers' Participation in Management in Britain. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
Craver, Charles B. 2010. The National Labor Relations Acts At 75: In Need of a Heart Transplant. Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal 27:311-356.
Davies, Paul L., and Sarah Worthington. 2012. Gower and Davies' Principles of Modern Company Law 9th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Davies, Paul. 2000. Board Structure in the UK and Germany: Convergence or Continuing Divergence?. International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal 2:435-456.
Davies, Paul. 2000. Employee Representation and Corporate Law Reform: A Comment from United Kingdom. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 22:135-147.
Davies, Paul. 2003. Workers on the Board of the European Company?. Industrial Law Journal 32:75-96.
Davies, Paul. 2006. Boards of Directors: the European Perspective. Pp. 42-46 in Corporate Governance in the US and Europe Where Are We Now?, edited by Geoffrey Owen, Tom Kirchmaier and Jeremy Grant. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Davies, Paul. 2010. Introduction to Company Law 2d ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ewing, K. D., and G. M. Truter. 2005. The Information and Consultation of Employees Regulations: Voluntarism’s Bitter Legacy. The Modern Law Review 68:626-641.
Freeman, Richard B., and Edward P. Lazear. 1995. An Economic Analysis of Works Councils, Pp. 27-52 in Works Councils Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations, edited by Joel Rogers and Wolfgang Streeck. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Gill, Amiram. 2008. Corporate Governance as Social Responsibility: A Research Agenda. Berkeley Journal of International Law 26:452-478.
Gordon, Jeffery N. 1999. Employee Stock Ownership in Economic Transitions: The Case of United and the Airline Industry. Pp. 317-354 in Employees and Corporate Governance, edited by Margaret M. Blair and Mark J. Roe. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Greenfield, Kent. 1998. The Place of Workers in Corporate Law. Boston College Law Review 39:283-327.
Greenfield, Kent. 2006. The Failure of Corporate Law Fundamental Flaws & Progressive Possibilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Grundmann, Stefan. 2012. European Company Law Organization, Finance and Capital Markets. 2d ed. Portland Or.: Intersentia.
Hansmann, Henry, and Reinier Kraakman. 2004. The End of History for Corporate Law. Pp.33-68 in Convergence and Persistence in Corporate Governance, edited by Jeffrey N. Gordon & Mark J. Roe.
Hansmann, Henry. 2000. The Ownership of Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Hill, Jennifer. 2003. Corporate Governance and the Role of the Employee. Pp. 110-121 in Partnership at Work: The Challenge of Employee Democracy: Labor Law Essays, edited by Paul Golan & Glenn Patmore. Melbourne: Pluto Press.
Hopt, Klaus J. 1998. The German Two-Tier Board: Experience, Theories, Reforms. Pp. 227-258 in Comparative Corporate Governance - The State of the Art and Emerging Research, edited by Klaus J. Hopt et al. eds. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hopt, Klaus J. 2011. Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and International Regulation. American Journal of Comparative Law 59:1-73.
Hopt, Klaus J., and Patrick C. Leyens. 2004. Board Models in Europe – Recent Developments of Internal Corporate Governance Structures in Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy. European Company Financial Law Review 11:135-168.
International Labour Office. Social Dialogue. (2013). Available at http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@relconf/documents/meetingdocu`ment/wcms_205955.pdf
Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3:305-360.
Keay, Andrew. 2008 Ascertaining The Corporate Objective: An Entity Maximisation and Sustainability Model. The Modern Law Review 71:663-698.
Keay, Andrew. 2010. Stakeholder Theory in Corporate Law: Has it Got What it Takes?. Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business 9:249-300.
Kochan, Thomas A., Harry C. Katz, and Nancy R. Mower. 1984. Worker Participation and American Unions: Threat or Opportunity? Kalamazoo, Mich.: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
Kraakman, Reinier, John Armour, Paul Davies, Luca Enriques, Henry B. Hansmann, Gerard Hertig, Klaus J. Hopt, Hideki Kanda, and Edward B. Rock. 2009. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach 2d ed. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Maitland, Ian. 2001. Distributive Justice in Firms: Do the Rules of Corporate Governance Matter?. Business Ethics Quarterly 11:129-143. Reprinted in pp. 163-177 of Corporate Governance and Business Ethics, edited by Jeremy Moon, Marc Orlitzky and Glen Whelan. Northhamptom, MA: Edward Elgar. 2010.
Marchesan, Daniele. 2007. New Approach to Fiduciary Duties and Employees: Wrongful Discharge in Violation of Public Policy. University of Cincinnati Law Review 75:1453-1497.
McDonnell, Brett H. 2004. Corporate Constituency Statutes and Employee Governance. William Mitchell Law Review 30:1227-1260.
McDonnell, Brett H. 2008. Employee Primacy, or Economics Meets Civic Republicanism at Work. Stanford Journal of Law Business and Finace 13:334-383.
McDonnell, Brett H. 2011. Strategies for an Employee Role in Corporate Governance. 46 Wake Forest Law Review 429-445.
Mitchell, Lawrence E. 1999. Trust and Team Production in Post-Capitalist Society. Journal of Corporate Law 24:869-912.
Muller-Jen, Walther. 1995. Industrial Democracy: From Representative Codetermination to Direct Participation. International Journal of Political Economy 25:50-60 (1995).
Njoya, Wanjiru. 2004. Employee Ownership and Efficiency: An Evolutionary Perspective. Industrial Law Journal 33:211-241.
Pistor, Katharina. 1999. Codetermination: A Sociopolitical Model with Governance Externalities, Pp. 163-193 in Employees and Corporate Governance, edited by Margaret M. Blair and Mark J. Roe. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Plessis, Jean Jacques du, Anil Hargovan, and Mirko Bagaric. 2011. Principles of Contemporary Corporate Governance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Rock, Edward B., and Michael L. Wachter. 1999. Tailored Claims and Governance: The Fit between Employees and Shareholders. Pp. 121-159 in Employees and Corporate Governance, edited by Margaret M. Blair and Mark J. Roe. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Rogers, Joel, and Wolfgang Streeck. 1995. The Study of Works Councils: Concepts and Problems. Pp. 3-26 in Works Councils Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations, edited by Joel Rogers and Wolfgang Streeck. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Sadowski, Dieter, Joachim Junkes, and Sabine Lindenthalt. 2000. The German Model of Corporate and Labor Governance. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 22:33-66.
Thelen, Kathleen. 2001. Varieties of Labor Politics in the Developed Democracies. Pp. 71-103 in Varieties of Capitalism Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by Peter A. Hall and David Soskice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Tricker, Bob. 2009. Corporate Governance Principles, Policies, and Practices. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Weiss, Manfred. 2007. Convergence and/or Divergence in Labor Law Systems?: A European Perspective. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 28:469-486.
Weiss, Manfred. 2004. The Future of Workers' Participation in the EU. Pp. 229-252 in The Future of Labor Law Liber Amicorum Bob Hepple QC, edited by Catherine Barnard, Simon Deakin and Gillian S Morris. Portland, Or.: Hart.
台灣勞工陣線,產業民主專欄,available at https://sites.google.com/a/labor.ngo.tw/labor/discuss/mitbestimmung。
台灣勞工陣線,勞動經濟—新國有政策,available at https://sites.google.com/a/labor.ngo.tw/labor/discuss/neo-state-policy#TOC--1。
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54771-
dc.description.abstract我國公司法之研究重心,不論是公司內部之機關權限劃分,或是公司併購議 題,多集中在董事會與股東會之關係,尤其以董事之忠實義務(fiduciary duty)著 墨甚深。往往忽略公司組織中之員工角色,本文試圖將員工之角色拉進公司法之 規範,使公司法的關注焦點能注入員工權益之討論。
於第二章,本文回顧目前公司法中關於員工之相關法規範,員工之相關規定 都與金錢連結。然而,考慮員工之權益,公司法僅有財產式參與是否足夠?本文 提出員工參與之理論作為基礎,分析我國公司法中員工僅有財產式之參與有所不 足。
以員工參與作為理論基礎,賦予員工參與之手段,最直接之方式屬員工董事 或員工監察人之制度。比較法上有相同之制度設計,所以第三章分析公司法是否 要移植此制度。本文認為我國毋需於公司法中強制規定員工董事之制度,應留待 公司自行決定。
惟員工參與並非僅有直接參與經營階層一途,本文從德國、英國之發展觀察, 二者皆在工會以外,增加員工與公司合作之可能性。我國現行法制,亦有相類似 之設計,即勞資會議。因此,本文認為應該在既有之勞資會議上,確保勞方代表 所擁有之資訊權、商議權能落實,促使勞資和諧。
最後,本文在公司治理之基礎上,提出幾點建議,使保護員工之權益之目的, 不會淪為純粹的公司經營負擔。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn Taiwan, corporate law is primarily about shareholders, boards of directors and managers, and the relationships among them such as fiduciary duty. Occasionally, corporate law concerns itself with bondholders and other creditors. Only rarely, however, does a typical corporate law course or a basic corporate law text pause to consider the relationship between the corporation and workers. This thesis tries to consider employee rights into corporate law.
This thesis in chapter 2 reviews corporate law about the Article of employees, that is related to asset capital. All articles of employee in corporate law is employee participation with asset. Is that enough to employee? This thesis suggests employee involvement as a basic theory, analyzing the pros and cons of Taiwan corporate law.
According to employee involvement, it's an intuition legislated for labor director/employee director in corporate law. It's a common institution in many European countries such as Germany and Netherland. Thus, this thesis in chapter 3 analyze whether it is translated labor director/employee director to Taiwan's corporate law or not. In my conclusion, it is not appropriate to make labor director/employee director as a compulsory rule in Taiwan's corporate law. The rule of labor director/employee director is at company discretion.
Despite that labor director/employee director is a way of employee involvement, work councils, which is other way of employee involvement, provide a platform for employee and company to cooperate. In Taiwan jurisdiction, we have the same system as work councils. Therefore, this thesis in chapter 4 suggests that we shall improve our work councils existed system. It makes sure that employee can claim information right and consultation right. At same time, it helps company and employees have a good relation of employment.
Last but not least, this thesis based on corporate governance proposes few advisory amendments to facilitate beneficiary interest of employee and it can avoid increasing cost of company in order to fit the amendments.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:38:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-104-R00a21085-1.pdf: 1184887 bytes, checksum: f2f68347471d065f2af87299ee611af4 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
謝辭 I
摘要 VI
Abstract VII
第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究動機與研究目的 1
第二節、文獻回顧 2
第三節、研究範圍及限制與名詞使用 3
第一項、研究範圍及限制 3
第二項、名詞使用 4
第四節、研究方法 5
第一項、比較法分析 5
第二項、法律經濟分析 5
第三項、行為經濟學及政治經濟學 6
第二章、公司法上之員工權益 7
第一節、前言 7
第二節、我國公司法上員工權益之規定 8
第一項、勞資分享 8
第二項、勞資融合 11
第三項、小結 17
第三節、員工權益保障之法律制度 20
第一項、員工權益保障的公司法律策略架構 20
第二項、員工參與公司經營制度 24
第三項、我國與公司相關的員工參與 30
第四項、小結:建立我國的員工參與經營公司之制度 31
第三章、員工的選任權分析-員工董事之必要性 32
第一節、設置員工董事之前提(一)—公司理論之確立 33
第一項、公司社會責任與經營者經營判斷標準間之關係 33
第二項、我國公司法的經營者應該為誰負責 37
第三項、本文論點 42
第二節、設置員工董事之前提(二)—公司內部機關架構之分析 44
第一項、公司的機關架構概論 44
第二項、德國法 45
第三項、英國法 53
第四項、從實質功能論看公司內部機關架構 58
第三節、我國法的員工董事 65
第一項、前言 65
第二項、產業民主 66
第三項、我國勞工董事之立法沿革及問題 71
第四節、公司法設置員工董事之可行性 81
第一項、代理成本 82
第二項、德國共同決定制度背景及檢討 85
第三項、比較法之方法論 88
第四項、臺灣公司之股權結構與多樣之資本主義 94
第五項、歐洲公司規則之經驗 96
第五節、本章結論 101
第四章、員工之其他參與策略 103
第一節、前言 103
第二節、決策權(decision right) 103
第一項、公司法規範之公司所有者 104
第二項、賦予公司員工決策權 109
第三節、員工參與之其他方式 114
第一項、歐盟關於員工參與之指令 115
第二項、我國法的勞資會議 119
第三項、員工參與之借鏡—代小結 123
第四節、公司法與勞動法結合後之員工參與 125
第五章、結論與建議 128
第一節、結論 128
第二節、建議 128
參考文獻 130
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject員工參與zh_TW
dc.subject公司治理zh_TW
dc.subject勞工董事zh_TW
dc.subject勞資會議zh_TW
dc.subject董事候選人提名制度zh_TW
dc.subjectCandidates nomination systemen
dc.subjectCorporate governanceen
dc.subjectEmployee directoren
dc.subjectWork councilsen
dc.subjectEmployee involvementen
dc.title從公司治理論員工權益之保護—以員工代表制檢討為例zh_TW
dc.titleResearch on Employee Role in Corporate Law and Corporate Governance—A Focus on Employee Representationen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear103-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林國全教授,邵慶平副教授(Ching-Ping Shao)
dc.subject.keyword員工參與,公司治理,勞工董事,勞資會議,董事候選人提名制度,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordEmployee involvement,Corporate governance,Employee director,Work councils,Candidates nomination system,en
dc.relation.page136
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2015-03-30
dc.contributor.author-college法律學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept法律學研究所zh_TW
Appears in Collections:法律學系

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ntu-104-1.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.16 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved