請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54591完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳英璋 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Hsuan Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 王羽瑄 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:06:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-08-28 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-28 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2015-06-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 白欣宜（2013）。疾患認知表徵、調適目標、及生活目標之關聯性－乳癌個案研究之探討。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
吳英璋、許文耀（1993）。「青少年偏差行為的心理病理長期追蹤調查研究」。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：NSC-82-0301_H-002-026-G7，第一年研究報告），未出版。 吳英璋、陳慶餘、梁繼權、呂碧鴻、邱泰源、鄭逸如…洪福建（2008）。「建構以解析憂鬱情緒為基礎的憂鬱症與自殺預防處置─以慢性病患為對象的臨床實務研究」。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（編號：DOH97-TD-M-113-95003，第三年研究報告），未出版。 黃金蘭、Chung, C. K.、Hui, N.、林以正、謝亦泰、程威銓、Lam,B.、Bond. M.,及Pennebaker, J. W.（2012）。中文版「語文探索與字詞計算」詞典之建立。中華心理學刊，54(2)，185-201。 陳鍾誠、許聞廉（1998）。結合統計與規則的多層次中文斷詞系統。第十一屆計算語言學研討會論文集， 63-72。 Blagov, P. S., & Singer, J. A. (2004). Four Dimensions of Self‐Defining Memories (Specificity, Meaning, Content, and Affect) and Their Relationships to Self‐Restraint, Distress, and Repressive Defensiveness. Journal of personality, 72(3), 481-511. Barrett, L. F., Gross, J., Christensen, T. C., & Benvenuto, M. (2001). Knowing what you're feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cognition & Emotion,15(6), 713-724. Berkowitz, L., & Troccoli, B. T. (1990). Feelings, direction of attention, and expressed evaluations of others. Cognition and Emotion, 4(4), 305-325. Erikson, E.H. (1963). Childhood and Society. (2nd ed.). New York: Norton Epstein, S. (1991). The self-concept, the traumatic neurosis, and the structure of personality. In D. J. Ozer, J. M. Healy, & A. J. Steward (Eds.). Perspectives in personality, Vol. 3: Part A: Self and emotion; Part B: Approaches to understanding lives (pp. 63-98). London: Jessica Kingsley. Feldman Barrett, L., Gross, J., Conner Christensen, T., & Benvenuto, M. (2001). Knowing what you’re feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 713‐724. Figley, C. R., & McCubbin, H. I. (Eds.). (1984) Stress and the family: Coping with catastrophe. New York: Bruner/Mazel. Gillham, Bill. (2000). Case study research methods. New York, NY: Continuum. Hoppmann, C. A., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2010). Goals and everyday problem solving: Manipulating goal preferences in young and older adults. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1433-1443. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020676 Handelman, L. D., & Lester, D. (2007). The content of suicide notes from attempters and completers. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 28(2), 102-104. Habermas, T& Bluck,S. (2000). Getting a Life: The Emergence of the Life Story in Adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 748-769. Habermas, T., & de Silveira, C. (2008). The development of global coherence in life narratives across adolescence: temporal, causal, and thematic aspects.Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 707. Hermans, H. J. M. (1996). Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 31–50. Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social re-adjustment rating scale, journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213-218. Horowitz, M. J. (1986). Stress response syndromes (2nd ed.). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Keltner, D., Locke, K.D., & Audrain, P.C. (1993). The influence of attributions on the relevance of negative feelings to personal satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 21‐29 Krantz, A. M., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). Expressive dance, writing, trauma, and health: When words have a body. Whole person healthcare, 3, 201-229. Linde, C. (1993). Life stories. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of general psychology, 5(2), 100. McAdams, D. P.(2006)The problem of coherence. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19, 109–125. McAdams, D. P., & Olson, B. D. (2010). Personality development: Continuity and change over the life course. Annual review of psychology, 61, 517-542. Neimeyer, R. A., Herrero, O& Botella, L. (2006).Chaos to coherence: psychotherapeutic integration of traumatic loss. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19,127–145. Neimeyer, R. A. (2005). Widowhood, grief and the quest for meaning: A narrative perspective on resilience. In C. B. Wortman (Ed.), Late life widowhood in the United States. New York: Springer. Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Confession, inhibition, and disease. Advances in experimental social psychology, 22, 211-244. Pennebaker, J. W. (1993). Putting stress into words: Health, linguistic, and therapeutic implications. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 539-548. Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press. Pennebaker, J. W., & Beall, S. K. (1986). Confronting a traumatic event: toward an understanding of inhibition and disease. Journal of abnormal psychology,95(3), 274. Pennebaker, J. W., & Chung, C. K. (2007). Expressive writing: Connections to physical and mental health. Oxford handbook of health psychology, 417-437. Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Pennebaker, J. W., Mayne, T. J., & Francis, M. E. (1997). Linguistic predictors of adaptive bereavement. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(4), 863. Pennebaker, J. W., Kiecolt-Glaser, J., & Glaser, R. (1988). Disclosure of traumas and immune function: Health implications for psychotherapy. Journal of Counsuling and Clincal Psychology, 56, 239-245. Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 71, 2001. Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., & Francis, M. E. (2007). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC [Computer software]. Austin, TX: liwc. net. Pennebaker, J. W., & Keough, K. A. (1999). Revealing, organizing, and reorganizing the self in response to stress and emotion. Rimé, B. (1995). The social sharing of emotion as a source for the social knowledge of emotion. In Everyday conceptions of emotion (pp. 475-489). Springer Netherlands. Rosenwald, G. C. (1992). Conclusion: Reflections on narrative self-understanding. In G. C. Rosenwald and R. L. Ochberg (Eds.), Storied lives: The cultural politics of self-understanding (pp. 265–289). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Schwartz, G.E., & Kline, J.P. (1995). Repression, emotional disclosure, and health:Theoretical, empirical, and clinical considerations. In J.W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, and health (pp 177‐194). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Singer, J. A.& Bluck, S.(2001). New perspectives on autobiographical memory: the integration of narrative processing and autobiographical reasoning. Review of general psychology, 5(2), 91-99. Sowder, B. J. (Ed.). (1985). Disasters and mental health: Selected contemporary perspectives. Rockville. MD: National Institute of Mental Health. Stirman, S. W., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2001). Word use in the poetry of suicidal and nonsuicidal poets. Psychosomatic Medicine, 63(4), 517-522. Stiles, W. B., Osatuke, K., Glick, M. J., & Mackay, H. C. (2004). Encounters between internal voices generate emotion. In H. J. M. Hermans & G. Dimaggio (Eds.), The dialogical self in psychotherapy (pp. 90–107). New York: Brunner Routledge. Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E.T. Higgins & R.M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, Vol 2 (pp 527‐561). New York: Guilford. Thorne, A., McLean, K. C., & Lawrence, A. (2004). When remembering is 690 MCLEAN not enough: Reflecting on self-defining events in late adolescence. Journal of Personality, 72, 513–542 Tomkins, S. S. (1978). Script theory: Differential magnification of affects. In Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska Press. VandenBos, G. R., & Bryant, B. K. (Eds.). (1987). Catadysms, crises, and catastrophes: Psychology in action. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54591 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 敘說是被常用來表達自我的方式，也被發現對於提升個人的生理健康有很大的助益；根據「情緒書寫派典」，個體從敘說中獲益的機制來自經驗的意義化。並發展出語意探索與字詞計算軟體（LIWC）來分析文本資料，認為文本中認知字眼的「逐漸增加」可用來象徵「經驗連貫度增加、成為故事的過程」，並預測敘說文本個體的健康效益。然而，個體的內在整合狀態不見得能被「認知字眼的增加」完整解釋。回顧文獻後發現，生命故事的連貫性與多元性對於個體內在整合狀態有獨特的重要性。故本研究整合生命故事取向的文本分析方式，嘗試藉由個案研究的方式，分析兩位個案之乳癌經驗敘說資料，以瞭解LIWC與生命故事兩種文本分析方式與心理特性，以及後續健康效益之關聯。研究結果發現，生命故事取向的分析較LIWC能預測後續健康效益，且較能了解文本與內在整合狀態之關聯。因此，本研究認為使用生命故事取向的文本分析，較LIWC能完整了解個體內在整合狀態。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to explore the difference between Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) and the content analysis in the life story approach, as well as between each of their relationships with personal health. By using the case study design, results of narrative analysis showed that the content analysis in the life story approach could get as much information as LIWC on the quantitative dimension of narrative coherence and exceed LIWC in the qualitative domain. It was also observed that multiplicity played an important role in narrative. Results suggested that content analysis in the life story approach would be a better method to adopt to explore the connection between self integration state and narrative quality. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:06:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R00227205-1.pdf: 1564332 bytes, checksum: c2dc7bd2185f9a5c9d6affa1f09795fe (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………… 1
第一節 情緒書寫派典與LIWC……………………………………… 1 第二節 生命故事與連貫.…………………………………………… 6 第三節 研究目的……………………………………………………… 16 第二章 研究方法…………………………………………………………… 19 第一節 個案研究法…………………………………………………… 19 第二節 研究參與者…………………………………………………… 20 第三節 資料蒐集程序………………………………………………… 20 第四節 研究工具與資料分析方式…………………………………… 20 第三章 研究結果…………………………………………………………… 34 第一節 參與者A之個別資料分析…………………………………… 34 第二節 參與者B之個別資料分析…………………………………… 48 第三節 研究資料分析結果綜合討論………………………………… 53 第四章 討論………………………………………………………………… 57 第一節 研究結果對研究問題的回饋………………………………… 57 第二節 研究貢獻、限制、及未來研究方向………………………… 60 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………… 64 附錄一 研究參與知情同意書…………………………………………… 72 附錄二 編碼流程範例…………………………………………………… 76 附錄三 訪談大綱………………………………………………………… 83 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 多元性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生命故事 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 連貫度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | LIWC | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 個案研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生命故事 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 連貫度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 多元性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | LIWC | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 個案研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | LIWC | en |
| dc.subject | life story | en |
| dc.subject | case study | en |
| dc.subject | LIWC | en |
| dc.subject | multiplicity | en |
| dc.subject | case study | en |
| dc.subject | multiplicity | en |
| dc.subject | coherence | en |
| dc.subject | life story | en |
| dc.subject | coherence | en |
| dc.title | 比較「語文探索與字詞計算（LIWC）」與「生命故事敘說分析」
於敘說文本品質的探討－兩位患者乳癌經驗的語文化過程 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Comparison of “Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count “
and “Life Story Narrative Analysis” on Narratives Quality Evaluation-Based on the Verbalization of Breast Cancer Experiences of two patients | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林耀盛,鄭逸如 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 生命故事,連貫度,多元性,LIWC,個案研究, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | life story,coherence,multiplicity,LIWC,case study, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 83 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2015-06-25 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-104-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.53 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。