請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54509
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 雷立芬 | |
dc.contributor.author | Fu-Ping Chung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 鍾傅斌 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T03:01:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-07-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-07-20 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-07-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 吳聰賢(1997),《農業行政學》,台北:明文。
李宗儒(2000),「以資料包絡分析法衡量台灣地區魚市場經營之相對效率」,《農林學報》,49:3,53–63。 李應坼、林明宏、黃瑞吉與彭克仲(2014),「應用二階段資料包絡分析法於農會信用部經營績效之研究-以高屏地區農會為例」,《台灣農學會報》,15:3,297–323。 林嘉誠(2004),「公部門績效評估技術與指標建立」,《國家政策季刊》,3:1-20。 孫本初(2005),《公共管理》,台北:智勝。 孫煒(2006),「非營利組織績效評量的問題與對策」,《政治科學論叢》,28:163-202。 徐源清(2000),「台灣農業經營管理顧問專家輔導績效評估模式之芻議」,《農業經營管理年刊》,6:126-154。 陳柏琪、張靜貞、游明敏與徐世勳(2009),「台灣地區農會經營績效之評估--多部門資料包絡法之應用」,《經濟論文叢刊》,37:4,415–453。 陸宛蘋(1997),《台灣非營利組織需求診斷研究報告》,台北:亞洲基金會。 陸宛蘋與官有垣(2008),「台灣農業事務財團法人的組織績效估」,收錄於官有垣、陸宛蘋、陳錦棠主編,《非營利組織的評估:理論與實務》,台北:洪葉, 271-300。 莊忠柱與吳振國(2006),「台灣區農會信用部經營效率評估:非意欲因素資料包絡分析法的應用」,《東吳經濟商學學報》,52:1–25。 彭錦鵬、江瑞祥與許耿銘(2011),「非營利組織績效評量指標之建構」,《政治科學論叢》,49:125-160。 Abel, J., Thomson, J., and Maretzki, A. (1999). “Extension's Role with Farmers' Markets: Working with Farmers, Consumers, and Communities,” Journal of Extension, 37(5), 5. Aram, A. (1996). “Using Importance-Performance Analysis to Evaluate Teaching Effectiveness,” Resources in Education, 7, 144-150. Baloglu, S. and Love, C. (2003). “Association Meeting Planners’ Perceived Performance of Las Vegas: An Importance-Performance Analysis,” Journal of Convention & Exhibition Management, 5(1), 13-27 Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K., Schmidt, S. S., and Yaisawarng, S. (2002). “Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, 157–174. Huan, T. C. and Beaman, J. G. (2005). “Importance Performance Analysis: The Need to Bridge Solitudes for Its Effective Use.” Proceeding of 11th Canadian Congress on Leisure Research. Hawes, J. M. and Rao, C. P. (1985). “Using Importance-Performance Analysis to Develop Health Care Marketing Strategies,” Journal of Health Care Marketing, 5(4), 19-25. Kramer, R. (1981). Voluntary Agencies in the Welfare State. CA: University of California Press. Lebas, M. J. (1995). “Performance Measurement and Performance Management,” International Journal of Production Economics, 41, 23-35. Martilla, J. A., and James, J. C. (1977). “Importance-Performance Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 14(3), 77-79. McNeal, J. W. and Lamb, C. W. (1980). “Marketing Orientation in the Nonprofit Sector: The Case of Hospitals,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 8, 26-31. Nale, R. D., Rauch, D. A., Wathen, S. A., and Barr, P. B. (2000). “An Exploratory Look at the Use of Importance-Performance Analysis as a Curricular Assessment Tool in a School of Business,” Journal of Workplace Learning, 12(4), 139-145. O’Neill, M. A. and Palmer, A. (2004). “Importance-Performance Analysis: A Useful Tool for Directing Continuous Quality Improvement in Higher Education,” Quality Assurance in Education, 12(1), 39-52. Riviezzo, A., de Nisco, A., and Napolitano, M. R. (2009). “Importance-Performance Analysis as a Tool in Evaluating Town Centre Management Effectiveness,” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 37(9), 748-764. Salamon, L. M. and Anheior H. K. (1992). “In Search of The Nonprofit Sector:The Question of Definitions,” Journal of Marketing, 3(2), 125-151. Siniscalchi, J. M., Beale, E. K., and Fortuna, A. (2008). “Using Importance-Performance Analysis to Evaluate Training,” International Society for Performance Improvement, 47(10), 30-35. Steven, P. (2004). “The Use of Repertory Grid Analysis and Importance-Performance Analysis to Identify Determinant Attributes of Universities,” Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(2), 1-18. Toth, Z. E., Jonas, T., Berces, R., and Bedzsula, B. (2013). “Course Evaluation by Importance-Performance Analysis and Improving Actions at the Budapest University of Technology and Economics,” International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 5(1), 66-85. Tseng, M. L. (2011). “Importance-Performance Analysis of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Uncertainty,” Environment Monitor Assessment, 172, 171-187. Tyrrell, T. J., and Okrant, M. J. (2004). “Importance-Performance Analysis: Some Recommendations from an Economic Planning Perspective,” Tourism Analysis, 9, 63-76. Ugar, Y. (1999). “Modified Importance-Performance Analysis: An Exposition and Illustration,” Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 20(1), 23-35. Van Ryzin, G. G. and Immerwahr, S. (2004). “Derived Importance-Performance Analysis of Citizen Survey Data,” Public Performance & Management Review, 27(4), 144-173. Van Ryzin, G. G. and Immerwahr, S. (2007). “Importance-Performance Analysis of Citizen Satisfaction Surveys,” Public Administration, 85(1), 215-228. Wolf, T. (1999). Managing a Nonprofit Organization in the Twenty-First Century. NY: A Fireside Book. Wong, M. S., Hideki, N., and George, P. (2011). “The Use of Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) in Evaluating Japan’s E-Government Services,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 6(2), 17-30. 中華民國四健會。網址:http://www.fourh.org.tw/。線上檢索日期:2015年4月5日。 全國法規資料庫。網址:http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=421。線上檢索日期:2015年4月5日。 行政院農業委員會,邁進21世紀農業新方案《農業組織及福利》。網址:http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=60。線上檢索日期:2015年4月5日。 行政院農業委員會,黃金十年-樂活農業:加強培育新世代農業經營者。網址:http://www.ndc.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0017181&ex=1&ic=#.VWms7s-qqko。線上檢索日期:2015年4月5日。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54509 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 2013年,行政院農業委員會規劃「青年農民專案輔導實施計畫」,由直轄市及縣市農會召集轄區內青年農民組成聯誼平台,目前,台灣共有15個青年農民聯誼會。農民團體或組織最初成立目標的落實以及運作經營的績效,都會受其成員的參與程度影響,對於青年農民聯誼會而言,滿足青年農民們所期待的服務及幫助,以及維持會員們的滿意度與忠誠度,甚至吸引更多青年農民的加入,是一個重要議題。
由於青年農民聯誼會是以聯誼性為成立目的非營利社團,相關研究仍付之闕如。緣此,本研究以桃園市青年農民聯誼會為研究對象,根據非營利組織的相關理論,建構一組衡量青年農民聯誼會績效的評估指標,再以重要-表現程度分析法(Importance-Performance Analysis)分析問卷資料,以期探討青年農民聯誼會成員對聯誼會對各項評估指標之重視度以及滿意度,進而探討兩者之間的關係。 根據研究發現桃園市青年農民聯誼會需要改善的指標有「桃青農的社會聲望與公信力」、「與其他青年農民組織的互動交流」及「提供農業方面交流學習平台」等,皆屬於「與外界的資源網絡關係方面」構面的指標項目。故其他類似農民組織可以針對此項構面加強改善。最後建議政府可以在網路上建置雲端平台,需要幫助的青年農民可以在平台上刊登自己所需要的協助,各地的青年農民可以彼此交流或討論。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In 2013, Council of Agriculture Executive Yuan has planned a project “Implementation on Counseling Young Farmers,” where Farmers’ Organizations coming from the municipalities, cities, and counties convene the young farmers to form a platform. Now, there are 15 Young Farmers’ Clubs. The original aim and performance evaluation will be influenced by the involvement of the members in an organization. Therefore, it is an important issue to maintain the satisfaction and loyalty of the members, and to attract more young farmers to join.
This research sampled from the members of Taoyuan Young Farmers’ Club. Based on the theories of non-profit organizations and collecting data from past literature, the appropriate evaluation criterion and scale to Young Farmers’ Clubs’ performance have been developed and induced. Through the questionnaires and IPA method (Importance-Performance Analysis), we also explore the membership’s emphasis and satisfaction on the evaluation criteria and the relationship between them. The indexes that need improving are “the Social Reputation and Credibility of Taoyuan Young Farmers’ Club,” “the Interaction with Other Young Farmers’ Clubs,” and “a Platform for Learning Exchange on Agriculture,” which belong to the facet “Extra Resources from the External.” Accordingly, government could build a platform on-line, where young farmers could post what they need or communicate what they are confronted with other young farmers. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T03:01:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-P02627002-1.pdf: 1821794 bytes, checksum: dadbd07bb41481ab52c410005d76adbd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝誌 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 v 表目錄 vi 圖目錄 vii 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第貳章 農民組織與青年農民聯誼會 6 第一節 農民組織整理 6 第二節 全國青年農民聯誼會組成與輔導 18 第三節 桃園市青年農民聯誼會運作現狀 28 第參章 相關文獻整理與回顧 36 第一節 非營利組織與績效評估 36 第二節 非營利組織績效建構之相關文獻 40 第三節 重要-表現程度分析法介紹與其運用 42 第肆章 研究方法與設計 49 第一節 績效衡量構面與指標建構 49 第二節 問卷編製與資料分析方法 52 第伍章 結果分析與討論 54 第一節 樣本特性描述 54 第二節 各指標重視度與滿意度之差異性 56 第三節 青年農民組織績效指標分析 62 第四節 未來參與意願調查結果及本章小結 67 第陸章 結論 70 參考文獻 74 附錄一 桃園市青年農民聯誼會入會申請書 78 附錄二 桃園市青年農民聯誼會會章程(研議中) 80 附錄三 問卷 88 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 聯誼性農民社團績效評估:以桃園市青年農民聯誼會為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Performance Evaluation of Farmers’ Social Group: A Case Study of Taoyuan Young Farmers’ Club | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許明仁,顏建賢 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 青年農民聯誼會,非營利組織,績效評估,重要-表現程度分析法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Young Farmers’ Club,Non-profit organizations,performance evaluation,Importance-Performance Analysis, | en |
dc.relation.page | 89 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-07-03 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.78 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。