請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54485
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇國賢(Kuo-Hsien Su) | |
dc.contributor.author | Aiko Takagi | en |
dc.contributor.author | 高木愛子 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-16T02:59:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-08-05 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2015-08-05 | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2015-07-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | [ 中文文獻 ]
內政部統計處,2009,〈老人居住安排與長期照顧選擇之探討〉。 內政部戶政司、統計處,2014,《人口統計年刊》(94年版以前為臺閩地區人口統計)、內政統計年報。 王俊豪,2008,〈台灣初婚夫妻的居住安排〉。《人口學刊》37:45-85。 行政院主計處,1992,〈台灣地區人口老人狀況調查報告〉。 孔祥明,1999,〈婆媳過招為哪椿?:婆婆、媳婦與兒子(丈夫)三角關係的探討〉。《應用心理研究》4:57-96。 朱瑞玲、章英華,2001,〈華人社會的家庭倫理與家人互動:文化及社會的變遷效果〉。論文發表於「華人家庭動態資料庫學術研討會」,臺北市:中央研究院經濟研究所、國科會社會科學研究中心主辦,2001-07-27 ~ 2001-07-28。 伊慶春,1985,〈台灣地區不同家庭形態的偏好及其含意〉。《台大社會學刊》17:1-14。 伊慶春,2009,〈人口老化與家庭〉。49-68,收錄於羅紀琼主編,《台灣人口老化問題》。臺北:中研院經研所、孫運瓊基金會。 伊慶春、陳玉華,1998,〈奉養父母方式與未來奉養態度之關聯〉。《人口學刊》19:1-32。 伊慶春、簡文吟,2001,〈已婚婦女的持續就業:家庭制度與勞動市場的妥協〉。《台灣社會學》1:149-182。 林如萍,1996,〈老年人與成人子女之代間關係──代間交換研究〉。《中華家政》25:77-85。 林益厚,1989,《人口變遷與家戶組成之關係:台灣地區之模擬分析》。台中:私立東海大學社會學研究所博士論文。 邱啟潤、許淑敏,2000,〈談關懷家庭照顧者〉。《高雄護理雜誌》17(1):7-13。 邱依苓,2009,《臺灣已婚婦女與公婆同住因素之探討》。桃園:長庚大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文。 柯瓊芳,2002,〈誰來照顧老人?歐盟各國奉養態度的比較分析〉。《人口學刊》24:1-32。 柯瓊芳,2006,〈家庭的養老與育幼功能:中、日、台與歐盟社會的比較研究〉。《國立政治大學社會學報》38:1-24。 徐良熙、林忠正,1989,〈家庭結構及社會變遷的在研究〉。25-55,收錄於伊慶春、朱瑞玲主編,《台灣社會現象的分析》。臺北:中研院三研所。 莊碧婷,2010,《影響申請育嬰假因素之探討-以新竹科學園區為例》。台北:銘傳大學公共事務學系碩士在職專班論文。 葉光輝,1997a,〈年老父母居住安排的心理學研究:孝道觀點的探討〉。《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》83:121-168。 葉光輝,1997b,〈台灣民眾之孝道觀念的變遷情形〉。171-214,瞿海源、張苙雲等主編《九〇年代的台灣社會:社會變遷基本調查研究系列二(下)》台北南港:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處專書。 陳肇男,1993,〈台灣地區鰥寡老人之居住安排〉。《中國社會學刊》17:163-179。 陳肇男、史培爾,1990,〈台灣地區現代化過程中對老人的居住安排之影響〉。《人口變遷與經濟社會發展研討會論文集》台中:中國人口學會。 章英華、齊力,1991,〈台灣家戶型態的變遷:從日據到光復後〉。《思與言》29(4):85-113。 曾瀝儀、張金鶚、陳淑美,2006,〈老人居住安排選擇──代間關係之探討〉。《住宅學報》15(2)45-64。 喻維欣,2009,〈家庭〉。170-193,收錄於王振寰、瞿海源主編《社會學與台灣社會》台北:巨流圖書公司。 張桂霖、張金鶚,2010,〈老人居住安排與居住偏好之轉換:家庭價值與交換理論觀點的探討〉。《人口學刊》40:41-90。 詹淑芬,2005,〈公婆-家親抑或自築愛巢-試討論與公婆同住的利弊〉。《網路社會學通訊期刊》45,http://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/45/45-28.htm,取用日期:2015年1月13日。 齊力,1990,〈近二十年來台灣地區家戶核心化趨勢之研究〉。《台灣大學社會學刊》20:41-83。 賴澤涵、陳寬政,1986,〈台灣的社會變遷與家庭制度〉。《加強家庭教育促進社會和諧學術研討會論文集》15-42。 衛生福利部,2013,《老人狀況調查報告》http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_list_no=4695,取用日期:2015年1月13日。 劉淑娟,2006,〈談女性與家庭照護〉。《家庭教育雙月刊》1: 78-84。 羅紀瓊,1987,〈近十年來台灣老人家庭結構變遷的研究〉。《台灣經濟預測》18(2)83-107。 [ 外文文獻 ] Atou, M., 2000, 「少子化をもたらしたもの」。『現代人口学』日本評論社。 Beck, Ulrich and Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth, 2001=2002, Camiller, Patrick(tr.), Individualization, London: SAGE. Brinton, M. C., 1993, “Age and sex in the occupational structure: A United States-Japan comparison.”, Sociological Forum, 8(1): 93-111. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, 2013, 「平成25年版 少子化社会対策白書」, http://www8.cao.go.jp/shoushi/shoushika/whitepaper/measures/w-2013/25webhonpen/index.html (Date visited: Jan 13, 2015). Cameron, L., 2000, “The Residency Decision of Elderly Indonesians: A Nested Logit Analysis.”, Demography, 37(1):17-27. Elman, C., 1998, “Intergenerational Household Structure and Economic Change at the Turn of the Twentieth Century.” Journal of Family History 23(4):417-440。 Emerson, R. M., 1972, “Exchange Theory, Parts Ⅰ&Ⅱ” in Sociological Theories in Progress. Vol.Ⅱ, edited by Berger, J., M. Zelditch and B. Andesson. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 38-87. Endo, H. & Yoshida, A., 2001, 「家族の同居・別居選択と訪問介護サービス需要」, 『季刊社会保障研究』, 37(3):281-296. Ganzeboom, Harry B. G. and Donald J. Treiman, 1996, 'Internationally Comparable Measures of Occupational Status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations.' Social Science Research 25: 201-39. Greenhalgh. S., 1985, “Sexual stratification: The other side of ‘growth with equity’ in East Asia.”Population and Development Review, 30(3): 417-448. Hayashi, F., 1997, “Is the Japanese Family Altruistically Linked? A Test Based on Engel Curves,” Understanding Saving: Evidence from the United States and Japan, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 209-239. Hiroshima, K., 1984, 「戦後日本における親と子の同居率の人口学的実証分析」,『人口問題研究』169:31-42. Hiroshima, K., 1991, ”Coresidence with Parents and Marriage in Recent Japan”, 『人口問題研究所 第200回記念特集』47(3):53-70。 Hiroshima, K., 1998, 「親子同居の人口学的分析モデルによる分析」,『日文研ワーキングペーパー』http://www.eco.shimaneu-.ac.jp/~hirosima/KOJIN/gyoseiki.html (Date visited: Jan 13, 2015) Hogan, D. P. and Astone, N. M., 1986, “The Transition to Adulthood,” Annual Review of Sociology 12:109-130. Hukuda, H., 2004, 「配偶関係、親との居住関係、及び家計支出の変化──パネル10から11における変化」. 27-36 in 『共依存する家計』, edited by 家計経済研究所. Tokyo: 国立印刷局. Hunaoka, N. & Ayusawa,M., 2000, 「高齢者の同居の決定要因の分析——家族の生活状況と保証機能」143-177 in『家族・世帯の変容と生活保障機能』, edited by National Institute of Population and Social Security Research in Japan. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. International Labour Office, 1990, International Standard Classification of Occupation: ISCO-88, International Labour Office. Iwamoto, Y. and Hukui, T., 2001, 「同居選択における所得の影響」.『日本経済研究』42:21-43. Kamata, K. , 2003, “The Determinants of Co-residence with Own Parents About Young Adults.” 『経済学研究論集』 19:109-126. Tokyo: Meiji University. Kato, A., 2005, 「『直系家族から夫婦家族制』は本当か」, 139-154 in NFRJ-S01 Report No.2: Trails of families in post-War Japan, edited by Kumatani, S. & Okubo, T. Japan Society of Family Sociology, NFRJ Committee. Kojima, H., 1990, “Coresidence of Young Adults with Their Parents in Japan : Do Sib Size and Birth Order Matter”, Population Studies of Japan, 13:15-26. Koyama, S., 2013, Ryosai Kenbo, The Educational Ideal of 'Good Wife, Wise Mother' in Modern Japan , translated by FILLER, Stephen, Boston, Brill. Koyano, W., 1996, “Filial Piety and Intergenerational Solidarity in Japan.” Australian Journal 15:51-56. Kumagai and Kato, 2007, Factors Facilitating Japanese Married Women Entering the Labour Force. Current Sociology 55(4):561-577. Lee, Mei-Lin, Hui-Sheng Lin, and Ming-Cheng Chang, 1995, ”Living Arrangements of the Elderly in Taiwan: Qualitative Evidence, ” Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 10:53-78. Lee, Yean-Ju, Willian L. Parish, and Robert J. Willis, 1994, “Sons, Daughters, and Intergenerational Support in Taiwan”, American Journal of Sociology 99(4):1010-1041. Lin, Chiu-ju, 2005, ”Modern Daughters-in-law in Colonial Taiwanese Families. ”,Journal of Family History 30(2)191-209. Lin I. F., Goldman N., Weinstein M. Lin Y. H., Gorrindo T, and Seeman T., 2003, “Gender Differences in Adult Children’s Support of Their Parents in Taiwan”,Journal of Marriage and Family 65:184-20. Linda G. Martin and Norito O. Tsuya, 1994, “Interactions of Middle-Aged Japanese with Their Parents.” Population Studies 45:299-311. Matsuoka, T., Miyanaka, A.and Iwawaki, Y.(1996)“” Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, 2013a, 「保育所関連状況取りまとめ」, http://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/04-Houdouhappyou-11907000-Koyoukintoujidoukateikyoku-Hoikuka/0000022681.pdf (Date visited: Jan 13, 2015) Ministry of H.L.W. of Japan, 2013b, 「平成25年国民生活基礎調査の概況」, http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/k-tyosa/k-tyosa13/dl/05.pdf (Date visited: Jan 13, 2015) Miyanaka, F., Yamaguchi, M. and Matsuoka, T., 1998, 「祖母の子育て参加が母親に与える影響」 Japanese Lournal of Maternal Health, 37(1):91-98. Nagase, N., 2001, 「子どもコストの推計:家計および資産面からの分析」. Population Studies of Japan 28:1-15. National Institute of Population and Social Security Research in Japan, 1998, 「日本人の結婚と出産 平成9年第11回出生動向基本調査 第Ⅰ報告書」. Nishino, M., 2000, 「家族の認知に関する探求的研究:個人の認知と社会規範との連結をめざして」『家族研究年報』25:43-56. Yamanashi: Japanese Council on Family Relations. Nishino, M., 2006, “An Analysis of the Change in Family Consciousness.” 139-152 in NFRJ03 Second Report No. 1: Wives and husbands, households, and life-course (Japan Society of Family Sociology)., edited by NISHINO Michiko, INABA Akihide and SHIMAZAKI Naoko. Tokyo: NFRJ Committee, Nishioka, H., 2000, “Parent-Adult Child Relationships in Japan-Determinants of Parent-Adult Child Coresidence”,Journal of Population Problems 56(3):34-55. Ofstedal, M. B., 1995, “Coresidence Choices of Elderly Parents and Adult Children in Taiwan.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan. Ogburn, William F., and Tibbits, C, 1933, “The Family and Its Functions”, Recent Social Trends in the United States, New York. Ono, H., 1999, “Are sons and daughters substitutable? A study of intra-household allocation of resources in contemporary Japan.” Mimeo. Ozbay, F., 1984, “Changes in the Social and Economic Structure in Rural Areas.” In Changes in the Family in Turkey: Sociological Analyses. Ankara: Turkish Society of Social Sciences, 35-68. Rovert D. Retherford, Naohiro Ogawa and Satomi Sakamoto, 1996, “Values and Fertility Change in Japan”, 50:5-25. Sakai, H., 1997, 「成人子と女親の居住関係—成人子の兄弟姉妹構成を考慮して—.」『日本の人口変動の社会経済的モデルの開発に関する研究Ⅱ世帯変動に関する研究』34-48. Tokyo: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research in Japan. Sakamoto, K., 2006, 「親との同居選択の要因とその効果──Peopensity Score Matchingによる分析 既婚者の場合」 Household Economics Studies of Japan, 72:21-30. Sakihara, T., 2009, “The Impact of Co-residence – Causal Analyses on Co-residence with Own Parents,” Economic Studies, 31:1-21. Tokyo: Meiji University graduate school. Shah, N. M., K. M. Yount, M. A. Shah, and I. Menon, 2002, “Living Arrangements of Older Women and Men in Kuwait.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 17:337-355。 Statistics and Information Department, Minister’s Secretariat, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2013, ”Vital statistics in Japan, Trend up to 2012”. Tabuchi, R., 1998, 「老親・成人子同居の規定要因.」Population Studies of Japan 54(3):3-19. Tabuchi, R. , 2010, 「家族戦略」256-257 in『社会学事典』, edited by 日本社会学会社会学事典刊行委員会. Tokyo: Maruzen Publishing Co. Ltd. Tabuchi, R. and Nakazato, H., 2004, 「老親と成人子との居住関係──同居・隣居・近居・遠居をめぐって」,121-14 in Structure and Change in Contemporary Japanese Families: Quantitative Analyses of National Family Research (NFRJ98), edited by Watanabe, H. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. Takayama, N. and Arita, H., 1996, 「同居高齢者の経済状況」159-182 in『貯蓄と資産形成──家計資産のマイクロデータ分析』Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, Publishers. Tsai, T. M., and Yi, C. C., 1997, ”Persistence and changes in Chinese family values: The Taiwanese case.” 170-214,收錄於張苙雲、呂玉瑕、王甫昌主編《九零年代的台灣社會:社會變遷基本調查研究系列二》。台北:中央研究院社會學研究所。 Ward, R., J, Logan. and G, Spitze., 1992, “The Influence of Parent and Child Needs on Coresidence in Middle and Later Life”, Journal of Marriage and the Family 54:209-221. Whyte, L., 1994, “Coresidence and Leaving Home: Young Adults and Their Parents”, Annual Review of Sociology, 20:81-102. Wilmoth, J. M., 1998, “Living Arrangement Transitions among American’s Older Adults.”The Gerontologist 38(4):434-444. Yaegashi, M., Egusa, Y., Ri, Yonhi., Ogawa, T. and Watanabe, T., 2003, ”Influence on Mothers’ Raising of Children through Grandparents’ Participation.” Kawasaki Journal of Medical Welfare Society ,13 (2) :233-245. Yamada, M., 1997, 『パラサイト・シングルの時代』, Saitama: Chikumashobo Ltd.。 Yamada, M., 2012, “Comments on Family Strategy and Intergenerational Relationships in Japan”,Japanese Journal of Family Socioligy, 24(1):56-59., Yoshida, R. , 2014, 「男女や年齢に関係なく生涯現役でいられる社会へ。」. http://famifure.pref.aichi.jp/download/pdf/interview.pdf (Date visited: Jab 13, 2015) Yu, Wei-shin., Su, Kuo-hsien. and Chiu, Chi-Tsun, 2012, “Sibship Characteristics and Transition to First Marriage in Taiwan: Explaning Gender Asymmetries”,Popul Res Policy Rev., 31:609-636. Zimmer, Z., 2005, “Health and Living Arrangement Transitions among China’s Oldest-Old.” Research on Aging 27(5)526-555. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/54485 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在傳統東亞社會中,婆媳之間的關係,是影響婚後兩代之間關係的重要因素。在現代社會裡,婚後的居住安排已經逐漸脫離傳統的規範(norm),是一種可以自由選擇的決定。不少日本學者提出重新找出現代的代間同住決策之影響因素的必要性。儘管在東亞現代化的過程中,朝向多元家庭發展的趨勢十分明顯,在日本兩代之間同住的現象已日漸稀少,但在台灣目前仍有二成的人口與上一代同住?哪些因素會影響台灣人在婚後與公婆同住的決策?
本研究採用「東亞社會階層與社會流動研究」(SSM)的資料,並利用邏輯式迴歸模型(logistic regression model)來比較台灣和日本媳婦與公婆同住的現象,受到哪些不同的因素影響。本研究考量的因素主要來自Tabuchi的同住需求理論,即從經濟層面與文化規範層面來比較同為儒教文化的台日社會,分析影響與公婆同住的決策因素。 結果顯示,由於台灣與日本的規範不同使得與公婆同住的現象在兩國有不同結果:在台灣因為有父母輪流與兒子同住的文化規範,所以在丈夫經濟能力不足、有學齡前小孩、丈夫兄弟人數較少的情況下,與公婆同住機率上升趨勢較明顯;而日本因為較強調妻子育兒責任與長子優先照顧父母的文化規範,在丈夫社經地位較低、丈夫為長子、丈夫兄弟人數較少的情況下,同住機率上升趨勢較明顯。研究發現台灣社會裡的代間同住比例不像日本一樣變低主要是因為:台灣代間家庭具有育兒功能。當年輕子代夫妻沒有經濟能力時能夠兩人一起出外賺錢,因為請婆婆幫忙照顧小孩在台灣社會是被接受的。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Historically, in traditional East Asian society, the relationship between a mother-in-law and daughter -in-law would be an important factor in determining the relationship of the two generations after marriage. In modern society, living arrangements after marriage have already deviated from traditional norms. The wife, husband, and the husband’s parents (or other relatives) are able to choose with whom to live, based on their individual needs. In modern East Asian, traditional norms is losing influence in the decision to live in a multigenerational home. Many Japanese scholars point out several important factors that affect living arrangement after marriage. In East Asia, there has been a clear tendency towards nuclear families. The multigenerational households is becoming increasingly scarce in Japan. In contrast, over 16 percent of the Taiwanese still live in a multigenerational household. What factors have influenced the decision of Taiwanese individuals to live with their in-laws after marriage?
This study uses the data taken from the 2005 Social Stratification and Social Mobility (SSM) survey and uses the logistic regression model to analyze factors associated with the decision to live with the parents-in-laws. Based on Tabuchi’s theory of cohabitation needs, this study explores how economic status and cultural norms affect whether to live with parent-in-laws in two societies. Since Taiwanese and Japanese cultural norms differ the frequency of living together with one’s in-laws also differs in the two countries. In Taiwan, the cultural norm is for parents to take turns living with their children. If the husband has lower socioeconomic status, pre-school age children, or few brothers; the likelihood of living with his parents tends to be noticeably higher. In Japan, there are cultural norms such as women bearing responsibility for raising children and caring for one’s parents out of respect. If the husband’s socioeconomic status is lower, if he is the eldest son, or has few brothers the likelihood of living together increases considerably. Research finds that instances of multigenerational homes in Taiwanese society have not decreased as much as in Japan. This is primarily because Taiwan does not have the same expectation that wives should raise. The younger married generation cannot financially support themselves, so Taiwanese couples work and rely on the older generation to help care for the children at home. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-16T02:59:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-104-R01325014-1.pdf: 1918028 bytes, checksum: d58aeadee72c00ab4150faa7b96c146f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 一、 導論 1
(一) 家庭核心化、多元化與現代化 5 (二) 家庭功能論以及社會學角度 6 1. 誰來照顧小孩? 8 2. 誰來看護老爸媽? 10 3. 小結 11 (三) 研究目的 13 (四) 小結 15 二、 文獻探討 16 (一) 代間同住決策研究 16 (二) 傳統模型往交換模型 17 (三) Tabuchi’s 同住需求理論 19 1. 親代需求因素──奉養老父母 21 2. 子代需求因素──育幼功能 22 3. 傳統文化規範因素-內在性與外在性 23 (四) 文獻小結 27 三、 研究設計與方法 28 (一) 研究架構 28 (二) 研究假設 29 1. 經濟側面:經濟資源需求 29 2. 經濟側面:媳婦生命歷程 30 3. 文化側面:儒教文化規範 31 4. 文化側面:性別意識現代化 32 (二) 研究資料 32 (三) 研究對象 33 (四) 研究變項 34 依變項 34 解釋變項 35 控制變項 37 (五) 分析方法 39 (六) 小節 40 四、 研究結果與討論 41 (一) 研究樣本特性 41 (二) 與公婆同不同住間差異探討 44 (三) 與公婆同住的邏輯式迴歸分析 47 1. 經濟側面:經濟資源需求 48 2. 經濟側面:媳婦生命歷程 49 3. 文化側面:儒教文化規範 51 4. 文化側面:性別意識現代化 53 (四) 小結 53 五、 結論與建議 54 研究限制 57 未來研究方向 58 附錄 61 參考文獻 80 中文文獻 80 外文文獻 83 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 誰與公婆同住?台灣與日本婚後居住安排的比較 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Who Lives with the In-Laws? Comparing Living Arrangements After Marriage in Taiwan and Japan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 103-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 柯志哲(Jyh-Jer Roger Ko),田?真弓(Mayumi Tabata) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 居住安排,代間同住,家庭策略,家庭功能論,台日比較, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Living arrangements,Multi-generational households,Family strategies,Family functionalism,Taiwan-Japan comparison, | en |
dc.relation.page | 91 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-07-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-104-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.87 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。